222:. Just about every university will have an "English building", and many of them will be officially called that, let alone all the buildings named after people called English, or representing England at various events. It needs the disambiguation unless you think it's undoubtedly the main thing in existence referred to as "English building" (the answer is no, it isn't). What sources are used appear to be almost entirely primary sources, not indicating that it has outside notability. I am also concerned that
449:
414:
211:
323:
622:
595:
587:
558:
538:
527:
498:
487:
270:
firm of the Beaux-Arts era, and (2) it was the home of one of the most influential early home economics departments in the U.S., whose research helped drive the early-20th-century revolution in domestic efficiency. I would love to flesh out this article more fully, but unfortunately, my time is limited. I cannot yet commit to spending a few full days with a stack of books.
361:, citations do not cover multiple paragraphs on Knowledge (XXG). If a source is used for consecutive paragraphs, each paragraph must cite the source. Google search is not adequate; if you cannot find an actual source for the material, since it has been challenged, then it shouldn't be included in the article.
625:
Article was created May 16 and nominated one day later, therefore it is new enough. The length is adequate and the article now meets DYK sourcing criteria. The article is neutral in tone. I detected to plagiarism issues and the Earwig tool only highlighted proper nouns which are not violations. All
326:
There are at least 3 paragraphs without a single citation, and many others with only one that clearly applies to only a sentence or two. Since the article is so short, that's nowhere near "95% sourced". Citation style hasn't accepted "common knowledge" or "dump a bibliography at the end" for a long
269:
I tried to avoid primary sources, but I will agree that many of the secondary sources are internal to the university. To add more external sources, I would need to dig more into two main reasons why the building is externally relevant, which are (1) it was designed by the pre-eminent architectural
342:
For each "paragraph without a single citation," just go down to the next paragraph and find the first source cited. For example, the first 2 paragraphs under "Architecture" are both sourced from , with the citation sitting in the second paragraph. If this is not proper formatting, I am happy to
626:
images used in the article are freely licensed on the
Commons. The nominator does not appear to have any DYK credits, therefore a QPQ is not required. The hook is short enough at 180 characters, interesting to a broad audience, properly cited in the article, and verified in the cited sources.
343:
change it. The only "common knowledge" statement is the sentence about which units currently occupy the building; a quick Google search will confirm their locations. All other information is sourced from the citations, and if you have any doubts, you are welcome to check.
262:
Concerning the potential COI, I am a student at the university, but I am not affiliated with the units that occupy the building. If this is still qualifiable as a COI, I will stop editing
University of Illinois
93:
219:
160:
230:
still have a few more days to work on the article before it would even be too late to nominate for DYK, and I'd offer a grace period for improvements after that date (24th) too.
252:~95% of the article is sourced, and the few statements that are not sourced are common general knowledge. If I need to change the citation style, I am happy to do so.
88:
646:
302:, it's been over a month, and no significant edits have been made to the article, though it was moved as you suggested. Can you please take a look at
437:
165:
171:
36:
226:
has undisclosed COI (editing behavior)? Similarly, I would like more information on the licenses for the images in the article. But you and
17:
544:
266:
The images' origins and licenses are explained on their
Wikimedia pages. The photos I personally uploaded are photos I took myself.
552:
170:
Students using the building have reported mysterious phenomena and the faint voice of a woman sounding from nowhere." Source:
44:
433:
521:
143:
581:
492:
481:
83:
306:'s response and the article itself, and determine whether the nomination should proceed? Thank you very much.
548:
418:
113:
366:
311:
118:
40:
218:
of the article is unsourced or the sources aren't clear. I also highly recommend moving the article to
631:
459:
388:
348:
279:
199:
191:
214:
Article new and long enough, generally well written but poorly sourced. I would go so far as to say
448:
332:
235:
103:
532:
376:
362:
307:
627:
455:
384:
358:
344:
303:
275:
256:
227:
223:
195:
187:
413:
65:
640:
98:
210:
29:
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below.
380:
328:
299:
231:
322:
168:
is haunted by the ghost of a female student who drowned in the building's pool?
621:
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as
123:
61:
255:
I like the suggestion about creating disambiguation page, and I saw that
327:
time now, so I refuse to believe anyone thinks this could be adequate.
47:), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page.
514:
Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems
249:
Thank you for the helpful feedback. To address your points:
220:
English
Building, University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign
135:
English
Building, University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign
148:
567:
507:
467:
108:
574:Hook has been verified by provided inline citation
259:just moved the article to the suggested namespace.
8:
49:No further edits should be made to this page
71:
158:... that according to campus legend, the
166:University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign
74:
474:Article is new enough and long enough
417:Probably now ready for a second look.
7:
647:Passed DYK nominations from May 2021
379:, thank you for the clarifications.
383:, the article has been cleaned up.
24:
68:) 23:24, 2 August 2021 (UTC)
45:Knowledge (XXG) talk:Did you know
18:Template:Did you know nominations
620:
593:
585:
556:
536:
525:
496:
485:
447:
412:
321:
209:
32:Please do not modify this page.
202:) at 13:46, 17 May 2021 (UTC).
1:
634:) 02:35, 2 August 2021 (UTC)
462:) 02:15, 2 August 2021 (UTC)
604:
440:) 02:58, 27 July 2021 (UTC)
391:) 17:42, 17 July 2021 (UTC)
369:) 03:06, 11 July 2021 (UTC)
37:this nomination's talk page
663:
351:) 18:28, 7 July 2021 (UTC)
335:) 12:00, 3 July 2021 (UTC)
314:) 03:21, 3 July 2021 (UTC)
282:) 17:51, 22 May 2021 (UTC)
238:) 17:27, 21 May 2021 (UTC)
119:Find sources (notability)
94:Earwig's Copyvio Detector
41:the article's talk page
109:A Simple Word Counter
89:Reviewer instructions
545:copyright violations
114:Reviewers' template
553:close paraphrasing
453: Reviewing...
615:
614:
611:: None required.
603:
602:
566:
565:
522:Adequate sourcing
506:
505:
203:
173:
132:
131:
654:
624:
605:
597:
596:
589:
588:
568:
560:
559:
540:
539:
529:
528:
508:
500:
499:
489:
488:
468:
451:
428:
425:
422:
416:
325:
213:
194:). Nominated by
185:
169:
161:English Building
72:
56:The result was:
34:
662:
661:
657:
656:
655:
653:
652:
651:
637:
636:
635:
594:
586:
557:
537:
526:
497:
486:
426:
423:
420:
155:
153:
149:Article history
137:
128:
104:Character count
69:
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
660:
658:
650:
649:
639:
638:
613:
612:
601:
600:
599:
598:
590:
576:
575:
564:
563:
562:
561:
541:
530:
516:
515:
504:
503:
502:
501:
490:
476:
475:
466:
465:
464:
463:
442:
441:
409:
408:
407:
406:
405:
404:
403:
402:
401:
400:
399:
398:
397:
396:
395:
394:
393:
392:
371:
370:
353:
352:
337:
336:
316:
315:
288:
287:
286:
285:
284:
283:
273:
272:
271:
267:
264:
260:
253:
242:
241:
240:
239:
183:
182:
181:
180:
175:
174:
152:
151:
146:
144:Back to T:TDYK
140:
138:
136:
133:
130:
129:
127:
126:
121:
116:
111:
106:
101:
96:
91:
86:
80:
77:
76:
54:
53:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
659:
648:
645:
644:
642:
633:
629:
623:
618:
610:
607:
606:
592:Interesting:
591:
583:
580:
579:
578:
577:
573:
570:
569:
554:
550:
546:
542:
534:
531:
523:
520:
519:
518:
517:
513:
510:
509:
494:
491:
483:
480:
479:
478:
477:
473:
470:
469:
461:
457:
454:
450:
446:
445:
444:
443:
439:
438:contributions
435:
431:
430:
415:
411:
410:
390:
386:
382:
378:
375:
374:
373:
372:
368:
364:
360:
357:
356:
355:
354:
350:
346:
341:
340:
339:
338:
334:
330:
324:
320:
319:
318:
317:
313:
309:
305:
301:
298:
297:
296:
295:
294:
293:
292:
291:
290:
289:
281:
277:
274:
268:
265:
261:
258:
254:
251:
250:
248:
247:
246:
245:
244:
243:
237:
233:
229:
225:
221:
217:
212:
208:
207:
206:
205:
204:
201:
197:
193:
189:
179:
178:
177:
176:
172:
167:
163:
162:
157:
156:
150:
147:
145:
142:
141:
134:
125:
122:
120:
117:
115:
112:
110:
107:
105:
102:
100:
97:
95:
92:
90:
87:
85:
82:
81:
79:
78:
73:
70:
67:
63:
59:
52:
50:
46:
42:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
616:
608:
571:
511:
471:
452:
419:
215:
184:
159:
57:
55:
48:
31:
28:
493:Long enough
377:BlueMoonset
363:BlueMoonset
308:BlueMoonset
186:Created by
124:Hook length
75:DYK toolbox
628:Flibirigit
549:plagiarism
482:New enough
456:Flibirigit
385:Chevsapher
359:Chevsapher
345:Chevsapher
304:Chevsapher
276:Chevsapher
257:JustinMal1
228:JustinMal1
224:Chevsapher
196:JustinMal1
188:Chevsapher
263:articles.
99:QPQ check
84:DYK check
641:Category
543:Free of
472:General:
58:promoted
617:Overall
533:Neutral
512:Policy:
381:Kingsif
329:Kingsif
300:Kingsif
232:Kingsif
164:at the
551:, and
427:hinata
421:Naruto
582:Cited
572:Hook:
16:<
632:talk
460:talk
434:talk
424:love
389:talk
367:talk
349:talk
333:talk
312:talk
280:talk
236:talk
216:most
200:talk
192:talk
66:talk
62:SL93
609:QPQ
60:by
43:or
643::
619::
584::
555::
547:,
535::
524::
495::
484::
436:·
139:(
39:,
630:(
458:(
432:(
429:5
387:(
365:(
347:(
331:(
310:(
278:(
234:(
198:(
190:(
154:)
64:(
51:.
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
