237:- An interesting fact that would make a good DYK. Offline source to support hook. AGF. 5x expansion verified. Would, however, love to see the article separated into sections. A few assertions requiring verification are without footnotes. Eg. "In 1973, the Fenwick Club's annex building was listed on the National Register of Historic Places, becoming the seventh downtown building with this distinction; it qualified both because of its historically significant architecture and because of its place in local history."
390:
234:
253:
one section and one in the other; and the shortness of each paragraph means that each one-paragraph section would be unhelpfully small. Thank you for the reminder on the sentence in question, since that wasn't derived from citation #5, but what other content do you see that needs citation correction?
332:
Thanks for the clarification on the listing/delisting issue. Regarding the second concern I'm still not comfortable. You indicate that it's plain to see from the photo that the building has x dormer windows etc. But isn't that considered original research? - Based on your own assessment of the photo.
316:
As far as the paragraph: scroll down to the bottom of the source page to see the materials mentioned in the second sentence of the paragraph. Everything else is derived from the photograph, which plainly displays the two dormer windows in the steep roof, the division into bays, the gables atop some
268:
is used to support the contents of the entire paragraph from "The structure was also built of brick". However this citation does not yield much information. Could you provide a source that describes the building's structure? Additionally the article stipulates that the Annex is still on the national
252:
Um, why wasn't I told that you had objections? Please don't hold up a nomination by objecting without telling the nominator. Sections wouldn't be helpful in this article because of its short size — each paragraph is on a substantially different subject, so we wouldn't want to put two paragraphs in
348:
No, it's not original research: it's directly in there, directly attributable to the source. Original research is things "such as facts, allegations, and ideas—for which no reliable, published sources exist", including "analysis or synthesis of published material that serves to advance a position
364:
I appreciate your attempts to clarify but I'm still not convinced after doing some checks. However I don' think this issue is grave enough to prevent the DYK. Going ahead and giving my vote of approval but am still asking that you provide a better citation for the description of the building's
308:(the Ohio Historical Society is the SHPO for Ohio), and in the NR database (citation #1 in this article), its entry still says that it's listed. I contacted OHS some months back, asking about the discrepancy, but they didn't reply, and the
333:
For the purposes of verification I recommended including a citation for the description of the Annex' structure. Otherwise omit it from the article since it's not verified by the source used.
105:
215:
417:
100:
293:
304:, but most are still on the Register despite their destruction. A location's NR status is defined by the National Park Service, not by the
393:
Good to go. In addition to checks already made - no copyvio noticed nor close paraphrasing. Hook length is good and fact is interesting.
36:
305:
188:: It's close to my bedtime, so no review. Ping me if I don't come back and do a review by the time you've reviewed this nomination.
17:
44:
312:
hasn't had any substantial number of Ohio delistings since that time. More details will be supplied if you ask for them.
292:, on the delisting, let me give you a little background: Ohio has lots of NR sites that have been destroyed, including
155:
398:
370:
338:
278:
273:
it says the building has being delisted. I'm not sure how this works but it appears a bit contradictory to me.
242:
95:
264:
My apologies for not pinging you with the initial queries. I still have a few concerns. I'm assuming that
125:
69:
130:
270:
265:
349:
not advanced by the sources". Everything I'm presenting is directly dependent on the source page.
394:
366:
334:
274:
238:
29:
The following discussion is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below.
354:
322:
258:
226:
200:
115:
62:
40:
300:
it got added to the NR! Some of these have been removed from the
Register, such as the
301:
411:
110:
350:
318:
254:
222:
196:
172:
317:
bays, the windows in most bays, and the entrance and balcony in the middle bay.
389:
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as
233:
135:
309:
47:), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page.
160:
176:
was established as a
Catholic alternative to the YMCA?
203:). Self nominated at 04:30, 6 January 2014 (UTC)
120:
8:
49:No further edits should be made to this page
83:
418:Passed DYK nominations from January 2014
296:that was demolished in 1978 — one year
86:
216:Did you know nominations/Julián Ladera
288:Thanks for clarifying your meaning.
7:
24:
45:Knowledge (XXG) talk:Did you know
18:Template:Did you know nominations
388:
232:
32:Please do not modify this page.
401:) 04:47, 22 January 2014 (UTC)
373:) 04:47, 22 January 2014 (UTC)
357:) 05:02, 21 January 2014 (UTC)
341:) 04:24, 21 January 2014 (UTC)
325:) 00:13, 15 January 2014 (UTC)
281:) 23:40, 14 January 2014 (UTC)
261:) 05:51, 10 January 2014 (UTC)
1:
245:) 03:32, 7 January 2014 (UTC)
229:) 15:49, 6 January 2014 (UTC)
80:12:48, 23 January 2014 (UTC)
37:this nomination's talk page
434:
131:Find sources (notability)
106:Earwig's Copyvio Detector
41:the article's talk page
170:... that Cincinnati's
121:A Simple Word Counter
101:Reviewer instructions
310:recent listings page
126:Reviewers' template
204:
144:
143:
76:
425:
392:
236:
220:
214:
194:
84:
79:
77:
74:
72:
67:
56:The result was:
34:
433:
432:
428:
427:
426:
424:
423:
422:
408:
407:
406:
218:
212:
195:5x expanded by
167:
165:
161:Article history
149:
140:
116:Character count
81:
75:(Floreat Hova!)
73:
70:
63:
61:
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
431:
429:
421:
420:
410:
409:
405:
404:
403:
402:
395:EagerToddler39
385:
384:
383:
382:
381:
380:
379:
378:
377:
376:
375:
374:
367:EagerToddler39
359:
358:
343:
342:
335:EagerToddler39
327:
326:
302:Hotel Breakers
283:
282:
275:EagerToddler39
262:
247:
246:
239:EagerToddler39
230:
192:
191:
190:
189:
183:
178:
177:
164:
163:
158:
156:Back to T:TDYK
152:
150:
148:
145:
142:
141:
139:
138:
133:
128:
123:
118:
113:
108:
103:
98:
92:
89:
88:
54:
53:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
430:
419:
416:
415:
413:
400:
396:
391:
387:
386:
372:
368:
363:
362:
361:
360:
356:
352:
347:
346:
345:
344:
340:
336:
331:
330:
329:
328:
324:
320:
315:
311:
307:
303:
299:
295:
291:
287:
286:
285:
284:
280:
276:
272:
269:register but
267:
266:this citation
263:
260:
256:
251:
250:
249:
248:
244:
240:
235:
231:
228:
224:
217:
210:
209:
208:
207:
206:
202:
198:
187:
184:
182:
181:
180:
179:
175:
174:
169:
168:
162:
159:
157:
154:
153:
146:
137:
134:
132:
129:
127:
124:
122:
119:
117:
114:
112:
109:
107:
104:
102:
99:
97:
94:
93:
91:
90:
85:
82:
78:
68:
66:
59:
52:
50:
46:
42:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
313:
297:
289:
219:}}
213:{{
193:
185:
173:Fenwick Club
171:
147:Fenwick Club
64:
57:
55:
48:
31:
28:
365:structure.
136:Hook length
87:DYK toolbox
290:First off
211:Reviewed
111:QPQ check
96:DYK check
412:Category
314:Secondly
294:this one
65:Hassocks
58:promoted
351:Nyttend
319:Nyttend
255:Nyttend
223:Nyttend
197:Nyttend
186:Comment
298:before
16:<
399:talk
371:talk
355:talk
339:talk
323:talk
306:SHPO
279:talk
271:here
259:talk
243:talk
227:talk
201:talk
71:5489
221:.
60:by
43:or
414::
205:.
151:(
39:,
397:(
369:(
353:(
337:(
321:(
277:(
257:(
241:(
225:(
199:(
166:)
51:.
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
