Knowledge (XXG)

Template:Did you know nominations/Federal Web Managers Council

Source 📝

230: 163: 205: 145: 248: 181: 184:
ALT1 hook is passed. Phrasing in article is much better; I think it resolves my concern raised above. Everything else checks out. Also (just a note) nominator has <5 DYK credits so no QPQ needed. Regards,
166:
Thank you much! I placed a set of new quotation marks, added references where I think appropriate, added a couple of new outbound links for the .gov reform effort, and edited throughout to clarify meaning.
208:
It's improved, but I'm not sure that it's improved enough just yet. Compare for example "federal agencies to "get smart" about consolidation, sharing platforms, and computing resources" with
251:
From what I can see, you've addressed the paraphrasing concerns. The only other concern I had was the use of external links within the body of the article (discouraged by the
212:, or "collaborates across government agencies to modernize policies and improve the federal government's ability to manage and deliver online information and services" with 298: 36: 105:
is the steering committee for the Web Content Managers Forum, an ad hoc community of more than 2,000 U.S. government Web and New Media professionals?
214:"collaborate within and across government to modernize policies and improve the government's ability to deliver online information and services" 40: 17: 209: 274:
Thank you, Moswento. Much appreciated. I added those as external links at the bottom of the page and also cleaned up a leftover.
268: 44: 117: 101: 148:
very concerned with close paraphrasing of some of these sources. On first glance, seems in some places a direct copy.
84: 279: 238: 171: 133: 121:
manages the HowTo.gov website to help government workers deliver a better customer experience to citizens?
233:
Got it! I fixed the VonRoekel quotation by adding quotes. The "modernize policies" text I simply rewrote.
221: 190: 153: 275: 264: 234: 167: 129: 66: 213: 29:
The following discussion is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below.
210:"agencies have to "get smart" about consolidation, sharing platforms and computing resources" 252: 217: 229: 186: 162: 149: 292: 258: 61: 204: 144: 247: 180: 35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as
47:), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. 89: 255:), but I've taken the initiative and removed this. 8: 136:). Self nom at 14:15, 25 January 2012 (UTC) 49:No further edits should be made to this page 299:Passed DYK nominations from January 2012 7: 24: 45:Knowledge (XXG) talk:Did you know 18:Template:Did you know nominations 271:) 13:17, 23 February 2012 (UTC) 246: 228: 224:) 00:46, 13 February 2012 (UTC) 203: 179: 174:) 14:32, 11 February 2012 (UTC) 161: 143: 282:) 21:05, 23 February 2012 (UTC) 241:) 01:34, 13 February 2012 (UTC) 193:) 15:41, 12 February 2012 (UTC) 156:) 20:38, 10 February 2012 (UTC) 32:Please do not modify this page. 1: 71:22:13, 23 February 2012 (UTC) 118:Federal Web Managers Council 102:Federal Web Managers Council 76:Federal Web Managers Council 37:this nomination's talk page 315: 41:the article's talk page 128:Created/expanded by 137: 306: 250: 232: 207: 183: 165: 147: 127: 69: 64: 56:The result was: 34: 314: 313: 309: 308: 307: 305: 304: 303: 289: 288: 287: 253:Manual of Style 96: 94: 90:Article history 78: 72: 67: 62: 30: 22: 21: 20: 12: 11: 5: 312: 310: 302: 301: 291: 290: 286: 285: 284: 283: 243: 242: 201: 200: 199: 198: 197: 196: 195: 194: 158: 157: 125: 124: 123: 122: 115::... that the 107: 106: 93: 92: 87: 85:Back to T:TDYK 81: 79: 77: 74: 54: 53: 25: 23: 15: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 311: 300: 297: 296: 294: 281: 277: 276:Cirrus Editor 273: 272: 270: 266: 262: 261: 260: 254: 249: 245: 244: 240: 236: 235:Cirrus Editor 231: 227: 226: 225: 223: 219: 215: 211: 206: 192: 188: 182: 178: 177: 176: 175: 173: 169: 168:Cirrus Editor 164: 160: 159: 155: 151: 146: 142: 141: 140: 139: 138: 135: 131: 130:Cirrus Editor 120: 119: 114: 111: 110: 109: 108: 104: 103: 99:... that the 98: 97: 91: 88: 86: 83: 82: 75: 73: 70: 65: 59: 52: 50: 46: 42: 38: 33: 27: 26: 19: 257: 256: 202: 126: 116: 112: 100: 57: 55: 48: 31: 28: 218:Nikkimaria 187:Lord Roem 150:Lord Roem 293:Category 269:contribs 259:Moswento 63:Miyagawa 58:promoted 267:| 68:(talk) 16:< 280:talk 265:talk 239:talk 222:talk 191:talk 172:talk 154:talk 134:talk 113:ALT1 60:by 43:or 295:: 216:. 80:( 39:, 278:( 263:( 237:( 220:( 189:( 170:( 152:( 132:( 95:) 51:.

Index

Template:Did you know nominations
this nomination's talk page
the article's talk page
Knowledge (XXG) talk:Did you know
Miyagawa
(talk)
Back to T:TDYK
Article history
Federal Web Managers Council
Federal Web Managers Council
Cirrus Editor
talk

Lord Roem
talk

Cirrus Editor
talk

Lord Roem
talk

"agencies have to "get smart" about consolidation, sharing platforms and computing resources"
"collaborate within and across government to modernize policies and improve the government's ability to deliver online information and services"
Nikkimaria
talk

Cirrus Editor
talk

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.