345:
234:
348:
Approving ALT1 and ALT2; striking ALT0. Hooks check out, and I've added the appropriate inline citation. I actually prefer and find interesting ALT0, being someone who does not know that the IUCN reassesses species routinely. I would also imagine (though I'm guessing) that it is common for
93:
237:
Recently expanded fivefold, long enough, cited, within policy, and QPC review. Hook needs some reworking though, the word "which" does not work here (appears to refer to the IUCN Red List). Consider:
298:
Quick comment: the IUCN reassesses species routinely. Unless it was a surprising reassessment, I'd suggest looking for another hook, though a reviewer may still choose to promote this. Regards,
208:
204:
431:
88:
379:
349:
classifications of species to frequently be in doubt, which would in any event give ALT2 (which I just find not very interesting generally) the same problem. --
190:
Source: "You are strongly encouraged to quote the source text supporting each hook" (and the source, or cite it briefly without using citation templates)
269:{{IUCN2008|assessor=Smith, A.T.|assessor2=Johnston, C.H.|name-list-style=amp|year=2008|id=15048|title=Ochotona forresti|downloaded=10 April 2009}} --
182:{{IUCN2008|assessor=Smith, A.T.|assessor2=Johnston, C.H.|name-list-style=amp|year=2008|id=15048|title=Ochotona forresti|downloaded=10 April 2009}}
36:
166:
17:
44:
143:
398:
372:
354:
292:
222:
83:
387:
113:
40:
303:
118:
65:
394:
368:
360:
350:
288:
218:
316:
Thanks for your inputs! The change of assessment is the catch here. Although, here is another hook
383:
324:
274:
248:
161:
103:
311:
299:
257:
170:
61:
333:
425:
261:
253:
174:
98:
29:
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below.
282:
270:
364:
337:
329:
344:
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as
233:
123:
47:), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page.
209:
Template:Did you know nominations/Neponsit Beach
Hospital
205:
Template:Did you know nominations/Goliath imperial pigeon
148:
252:, previously assessed as insufficiently known on the
108:
328:had previously been treated as a subspecies of the
225:). Self-nominated at 22:34, 7 September 2017 (UTC).
267:Source: Previously published Red List assessments:
180:Source: Previously published Red List assessments:
380:Template:Did you know nominations/Moupin pika
367:too (bolded in ALT2 now)! Does it look fine?
8:
165:was assessed as insufficiently known on the
49:No further edits should be made to this page
287:Looks great! Thanks a lot for your review.
432:Passed DYK nominations from September 2017
393:I think it is alright with a single hook!
71:
74:
7:
167:IUCN Red List of Endangered Species
24:
390:) 13:11, 18 September 2017 (UTC)
375:) 12:56, 18 September 2017 (UTC)
45:Knowledge (XXG) talk:Did you know
18:Template:Did you know nominations
401:) 15:00, 18 September 2017 (UTC)
357:) 21:42, 9 September 2017 (UTC)
343:
306:) 03:04, 8 September 2017 (UTC)
295:) 02:52, 8 September 2017 (UTC)
277:) 00:19, 8 September 2017 (UTC)
232:
32:Please do not modify this page.
363:I have merged the DYK for the
1:
68:) 05:10, 5 October 2017 (UTC)
378:I suggest not to merge, see
169:, which was re-assessed as
37:this nomination's talk page
448:
119:Find sources (notability)
94:Earwig's Copyvio Detector
41:the article's talk page
159:... that in 1994, the
256:, was re-assessed as
109:A Simple Word Counter
89:Reviewer instructions
340:at different times?
134:
114:Reviewers' template
268:
226:
191:
181:
132:
131:
439:
347:
315:
286:
266:
236:
216:
189:
188::... that ...?
179:
72:
56:The result was:
34:
447:
446:
442:
441:
440:
438:
437:
436:
422:
421:
420:
309:
280:
260:in 1996 and as
258:near threatened
217:5x expanded by
171:near threatened
155:
153:
149:Article history
137:
128:
104:Character count
69:
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
445:
443:
435:
434:
424:
423:
419:
418:
417:
416:
415:
414:
413:
412:
411:
410:
409:
408:
407:
406:
405:
404:
403:
402:
395:Adityavagarwal
369:Adityavagarwal
361:Usernameunique
351:Usernameunique
325:Forrest's pika
317:
289:Adityavagarwal
249:Forrest's pika
246::... that the
239:
238:
219:Adityavagarwal
214:
213:
212:
211:
195:
194:
193:
192:
162:Forrest's pika
152:
151:
146:
144:Back to T:TDYK
140:
138:
136:
135:Forrest's pika
133:
130:
129:
127:
126:
121:
116:
111:
106:
101:
96:
91:
86:
80:
77:
76:
54:
53:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
444:
433:
430:
429:
427:
400:
396:
392:
391:
389:
385:
381:
377:
376:
374:
370:
366:
362:
359:
358:
356:
352:
346:
342:
341:
339:
335:
331:
327:
326:
322::...that the
321:
318:
313:
308:
307:
305:
301:
297:
296:
294:
290:
284:
279:
278:
276:
272:
265:
263:
262:least concern
259:
255:
254:IUCN Red List
251:
250:
245:
241:
240:
235:
231:
230:
229:
228:
227:
224:
220:
210:
206:
202:
199:
198:
197:
196:
187:
184:
183:
178:
176:
175:least concern
173:in 1996, and
172:
168:
164:
163:
157:
156:
150:
147:
145:
142:
141:
125:
122:
120:
117:
115:
112:
110:
107:
105:
102:
100:
97:
95:
92:
90:
87:
85:
82:
81:
79:
78:
73:
70:
67:
63:
59:
52:
50:
46:
42:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
384:Gerda Arendt
334:Royle's pika
323:
319:
247:
243:
242:
215:
200:
185:
160:
158:
57:
55:
48:
31:
28:
365:Moupin pika
338:Steppe pika
330:Moupin pika
312:Vanamonde93
124:Hook length
75:DYK toolbox
336:, and the
62:Cwmhiraeth
300:Vanamonde
99:QPQ check
84:DYK check
426:Category
264:in 2008?
201:Reviewed
177:in 2008?
58:promoted
283:NoGhost
271:NoGhost
332:, the
16:<
399:talk
388:talk
382:. --
373:talk
355:talk
320:ALT2
304:talk
293:talk
275:talk
244:ALT1
223:talk
207:and
186:ALT1
66:talk
60:by
43:or
428::
203::
139:(
39:,
397:(
386:(
371:(
353:(
314::
310:@
302:(
291:(
285::
281:@
273:(
221:(
154:)
64:(
51:.
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
