329:
205:
483:
291:
142:
145:
The fivefold expansion appears to have happened from
December 25, and a nomination for January 1 is more than five days away. So this doesn't appear to fulfill the newness requirement, unless you are invoking some exception. I'm not sure either if the inline citation directly supports the hook; the 1
187:
It looks like the problem here is a late nomination: with the expansion beginning on
December 25, the submission should have been within five days of that, no later than December 30, but was made two days later on January 1. (DYKcheck, for reasons that escape me, reports based on ten days, but it's
188:
five.) The article is easily 5x expanded as of its most recent edit, which was on
December 28. (I've pulled Till's name from the nomination, since creation of a redirect is not worthy of credit for DYK; Sauloviegas is the sole expander here (other folks just moved stuff around.)
386:, Poetic is quite right. Considering you're working at getting some articles to FA status I'd suggest you learn from the editor's mistakes here. We should strive to use our own words, not weave together 100 different quotes. —
208:
As the contributor only has a single DYK credit, I think seven days is acceptable per DYKSG D9 (once known as the
Swahili Rule). S/he could be told a bit more about DYK, because her/his other article was also not a self
486:
Nothing has been done in over 12 days. Given that this was allowed an exception, and has the significant issues pointed out by
Poeticbent, some action should have been taken before now. Closing nomination.
245:
only has one DYK credit thusfar, and that was not a self-nomination either. Thus, I think the age of the article is not an issue. Saulo could be told about DYK, but that's it. —
511:
36:
169:
The DYK Check said that it had been expanded 5 times. Either way, Rey still co-wrote the song. Think I misinterpreted the DYK Check.
17:
294:
A lot of quotes in this article. If necessary, quotes (except from lyrics) need paraphrasing, especially from
Reception section. --
260:
Hey, I didn't nominate it for DYK because I found the whole nomination procedure really confusing. I was going to do it with
401:
I don't even know why this is nom is still here. A mistake of mine, I nominated it 6 days after creation/expansion, not 5.
333:
44:
419:
You know as well as I do that article nominated a little late can still be passed. Is that a withdrawal? —
83:
309:
I'm unsure why this nomination is still here. I thought because I nominated it on the 6th day that that was it?
336:
and I read the article. An avalanche of quotes from the buttered-up media is in direct contradiction to our
492:
457:
424:
391:
270:
250:
214:
193:
122:
352:
261:
342:"classic Lana Del Rey; a beat-heavy number woven from kisses, stilettos and sultry speak-singing..."
443:
410:
373:
344:
The article might need to be rewritten from scratch (as far as I'm concerned), or flagged. Thanks,
318:
299:
233:
178:
130:
67:
159:
29:
The following discussion is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below.
488:
453:
420:
387:
265:
246:
210:
189:
118:
40:
345:
435:
402:
365:
337:
310:
295:
225:
170:
126:
62:
328:
204:
505:
155:
109:
482:
264:
also, but I got messed up while submitting and in the end I didn't even do it. -
104:
99:
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as
290:
141:
154:
performer", which is probably a reference to Rey, but it could be clearer.
383:
47:), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page.
434:
Well I didn't know that, no one has said. I'll work on the article.
146:
May MTV source calls the song a "collaboration" with her, although
452:
The applicable guideline is cited above... —
88:
150:
says that the song is "penned by a certain notorious
334:
Knowledge talk:Did you know#Old unreviewed DYK hooks
108:" was co-written by American singer-songwriter
8:
49:No further edits should be made to this page
512:Failed DYK nominations from January 2013
364:I find that analogy quite offensive.
7:
24:
18:Template:Did you know nominations
481:
327:
289:
203:
140:
133:) at 13:57, 1 January 2013 (UTC)
32:Please do not modify this page.
495:) 01:31, 31 January 2013 (UTC)
460:) 12:58, 18 January 2013 (UTC)
427:) 12:55, 18 January 2013 (UTC)
394:) 07:18, 18 January 2013 (UTC)
302:) 16:20, 13 January 2013 (UTC)
70:) 06:42, 31 January 2013 (UTC)
1:
253:) 22:54, 9 January 2013 (UTC)
217:) 22:39, 9 January 2013 (UTC)
196:) 17:23, 3 January 2013 (UTC)
162:) 22:48, 1 January 2013 (UTC)
445:12:57, 18 January 2013 (UTC)
412:10:47, 18 January 2013 (UTC)
375:23:10, 17 January 2013 (UTC)
357:22:54, 17 January 2013 (UTC)
320:16:36, 13 January 2013 (UTC)
272:16:32, 13 January 2013 (UTC)
382:Aside from it not being an
235:22:46, 9 January 2013 (UTC)
180:22:58, 1 January 2013 (UTC)
45:Knowledge talk:Did you know
37:this nomination's talk page
528:
340:policy/guidelines, i.e.:
41:the article's talk page
262:Something New (song)
332:. I came here from
152:Saturday Night Live
209:nom. —
134:
125:). Nominated by
519:
485:
440:
407:
370:
355:
350:
331:
315:
293:
268:
230:
207:
175:
144:
116:
56:The result was:
34:
527:
526:
522:
521:
520:
518:
517:
516:
502:
501:
500:
436:
403:
366:
353:
346:
311:
266:
226:
171:
95:
93:
89:Article history
77:
71:
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
525:
523:
515:
514:
504:
503:
499:
498:
497:
496:
476:
475:
474:
473:
472:
471:
470:
469:
468:
467:
466:
465:
464:
463:
462:
461:
447:
446:
429:
428:
414:
413:
396:
395:
377:
376:
359:
358:
324:
323:
322:
321:
304:
303:
286:
285:
284:
283:
282:
281:
280:
279:
278:
277:
276:
275:
274:
273:
255:
254:
237:
236:
219:
218:
198:
197:
182:
181:
164:
163:
114:
113:
92:
91:
86:
84:Back to T:TDYK
80:
78:
76:
73:
54:
53:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
524:
513:
510:
509:
507:
494:
490:
484:
480:
479:
478:
477:
459:
455:
451:
450:
449:
448:
444:
441:
439:
433:
432:
431:
430:
426:
422:
418:
417:
416:
415:
411:
408:
406:
400:
399:
398:
397:
393:
389:
385:
381:
380:
379:
378:
374:
371:
369:
363:
362:
361:
360:
356:
351:
349:
343:
339:
335:
330:
326:
325:
319:
316:
314:
308:
307:
306:
305:
301:
297:
292:
288:
287:
271:
269:
263:
259:
258:
257:
256:
252:
248:
244:
241:
240:
239:
238:
234:
231:
229:
223:
222:
221:
220:
216:
212:
206:
202:
201:
200:
199:
195:
191:
186:
185:
184:
183:
179:
176:
174:
168:
167:
166:
165:
161:
157:
153:
149:
143:
139:
138:
137:
136:
135:
132:
128:
124:
120:
111:
107:
106:
101:
98:... that the
97:
96:
90:
87:
85:
82:
81:
74:
72:
69:
65:
64:
59:
52:
50:
46:
42:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
437:
404:
367:
347:
341:
312:
242:
227:
172:
151:
147:
117:Created by
115:
110:Lana Del Rey
103:
61:
57:
55:
48:
31:
28:
489:BlueMoonset
454:Crisco 1492
421:Crisco 1492
388:Crisco 1492
247:Crisco 1492
243:Sauloviegas
211:Crisco 1492
190:BlueMoonset
119:Sauloviegas
105:Ghetto Baby
100:Cheryl Cole
75:Ghetto Baby
348:Poeticbent
296:George Ho
127:Calvin999
63:Lord Roem
506:Category
442:•
409:•
372:•
317:•
232:•
177:•
156:Shrigley
148:Idolater
58:rejected
384:analogy
338:wp:spam
224:What?
102:song "
438:AARON
405:AARON
368:AARON
313:AARON
267:Saulo
228:AARON
173:AARON
16:<
493:talk
458:talk
425:talk
392:talk
354:talk
300:talk
251:talk
215:talk
194:talk
160:talk
131:talk
123:talk
68:talk
66:~ (
60:by
43:or
508::
79:(
39:,
491:(
456:(
423:(
390:(
298:(
249:(
213:(
192:(
158:(
129:(
121:(
112:?
94:)
51:.
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
