98:
432:
404:
331:
needs to be part of a larger discussion. Otherwise, I would be happy to put X's through most of the DYKs that we have up for nomination, since most of them have at least one offline source. I am so sick of jumping through these hoops and seeing the incredible hypocrisy at DYK. I routinely review articles where I have to accept offline sources on good faith and I am really running out of good faith.
450:
189:
234:
330:
I'm not quite sure I understand. Are you saying that I cannot use that reference as an offline source? Because nowhere have I seen any requirement that
Gibraltar sources must all be online. If that is another hoop that writers of Gibraltar articles have to jump through, then that is something that
350:
was extremely restrictive. I checked all the usual locations (internet archive, webcite, Google cache) and a few other ones and couldn't find anything. I would think that a situation like this would be handled exactly like paywall sources in that
275:, expired. I haven't seen this happen previously. Would you prefer that I make it an offline source, or should I keep it, assuming that the owners of the domain will eventually realize that it has expired?
294:-related articles, especially ones that are featured as part of DYK in the Main Page. Online or offline, that dead source must be replaced. Therefore, no COI or advertising shall be suspected or arised. --
164:, Gibraltar-related articles are temporarily being reviewed by two individuals. In addition to the regular DYK criteria, at least one reviewer should also indicate whether they perceive any
407:
If there are no other sources to confirm that information, then I guess we must assume in good faith that the dead source may be reliable. However, I wonder if any other reviewer agrees. --
241:
did not archive its pages. Stopped in the middle of
Citation 3 because the website is dead. However, this skull is notable, so no COI suspected, and no promotional advertising contained. --
130:
161:
477:
374:; George, please note the following from that page (my bolding): "Do not delete cited information solely because the URL to the source does not work any longer.
453:
This article seems fine to me. It is long enough and new enough, the hook is sourced, the image is appropriately licensed and the article is non-promotional.
305:... Actually, if you want to keep that dead source, another active (or offline) source is required for that cited info. Otherwise, it must be replaced with "
97:
376:
WP:Verifiability does not require that all information be supported by a working link, nor does it require the source to be published online.
36:
290:
Due to
Gibraltarpedia hooplah, keeping that dead link is no longer a good option. Also, the same source must have been used in other
17:
419:
The link is now live. The domain was changed from .com to .net. May have to change links in other articles that use this source.
168:
or promotional concerns about the article under review.IP addresses and
Victuallers are not allowed to do the reviews.
44:
81:
309:
425:
193:
65:
458:
440:
412:
383:
320:
299:
246:
152:
371:
29:
The following discussion is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below.
420:
360:
336:
280:
261:
210:
144:
238:
61:
40:
256:
Thank you for your review. I'll check now to see what link went dead and try to remedy it.
454:
436:
408:
379:
316:
295:
242:
148:
435:
That's a relief! Either I again or someone else may review this article completely. --
431:
403:
346:
It's going to be near impossible to find an archived version of that page since their
471:
352:
165:
356:
332:
276:
257:
206:
140:
116:
107:
449:
188:
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as
347:
233:
291:
47:), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page.
131:
Template:Did you know nominations/Hackensack
Drawbridge
86:
162:Knowledge talk:Did you know/GibraltarPediA Options
237:One link is dead (or the domain expired), and
8:
115:, found in 1926, is that of a four-year-old
49:No further edits should be made to this page
273:7 Days - Gibraltar's Free Weekly Newspaper
478:Passed DYK nominations from October 2012
355:is assumed and the source is accepted.
271:The domain of source #3, the newspaper
370:This kind of situation is covered by
7:
119:girl dubbed the Devil's Tower Child?
24:
155:) at 21:51, 15 October 2012 (UTC)
18:Template:Did you know nominations
448:
430:
402:
232:
187:
96:
461:) 06:59, 22 November 2012 (UTC)
443:) 11:46, 13 November 2012 (UTC)
415:) 22:24, 9 November 2012 (UTC)
68:) 04:33, 24 November 2012 (UTC)
32:Please do not modify this page.
427:22:10, 11 November 2012 (UTC)
386:) 20:49, 9 November 2012 (UTC)
363:) 20:42, 9 November 2012 (UTC)
339:) 20:32, 9 November 2012 (UTC)
323:) 23:45, 8 November 2012 (UTC)
302:) 21:29, 8 November 2012 (UTC)
283:) 17:05, 8 November 2012 (UTC)
264:) 16:50, 8 November 2012 (UTC)
249:) 14:53, 8 November 2012 (UTC)
213:) 20:44, 5 November 2012 (UTC)
1:
198:14:51, 5 November 2012 (UTC)
205:Thank you for your review.
45:Knowledge talk:Did you know
37:this nomination's talk page
494:
41:the article's talk page
160:Per the discussion at
139:Created/expanded by
166:conflict of interest
372:Knowledge:Link rot
192:Absolutely fine.♦
156:
147:). Nominated by
485:
452:
434:
423:
406:
314:
308:
239:Internet Archive
236:
196:
191:
138:
100:
56:The result was:
34:
493:
492:
488:
487:
486:
484:
483:
482:
468:
467:
466:
421:
312:
310:citation needed
306:
194:
102:
93:
91:
87:Article history
75:
69:
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
491:
489:
481:
480:
470:
469:
465:
464:
463:
462:
445:
444:
400:
399:
398:
397:
396:
395:
394:
393:
392:
391:
390:
389:
388:
387:
365:
364:
341:
340:
325:
324:
303:
285:
284:
266:
265:
251:
250:
229:
228:
227:
226:
217:
216:
215:
214:
200:
199:
184:
183:
182:
181:
179:
170:
169:
136:
135:
134:
133:
121:
120:
94:
90:
89:
84:
82:Back to T:TDYK
78:
76:
74:
71:
54:
53:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
490:
479:
476:
475:
473:
460:
456:
451:
447:
446:
442:
438:
433:
429:
428:
426:
424:
418:
417:
416:
414:
410:
405:
385:
381:
377:
373:
369:
368:
367:
366:
362:
358:
354:
349:
345:
344:
343:
342:
338:
334:
329:
328:
327:
326:
322:
318:
311:
304:
301:
297:
293:
289:
288:
287:
286:
282:
278:
274:
270:
269:
268:
267:
263:
259:
255:
254:
253:
252:
248:
244:
240:
235:
231:
230:
224:
221:
220:
219:
218:
212:
208:
204:
203:
202:
201:
197:
195:Dr. ☠ Blofeld
190:
186:
185:
180:
177:
174:
173:
172:
171:
167:
163:
159:
158:
157:
154:
150:
146:
142:
132:
128:
125:
124:
123:
122:
118:
114:
110:
109:
105:... that the
104:
103:
101:
99:
88:
85:
83:
80:
79:
72:
70:
67:
63:
59:
52:
50:
46:
42:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
422:Froggerlaura
401:
375:
313:}}
307:{{
272:
222:
175:
137:
126:
112:
106:
95:
57:
55:
48:
31:
28:
117:Neanderthal
108:Gibraltar 2
73:Gibraltar 2
62:BlueMoonset
455:Cwmhiraeth
353:good faith
348:robots.txt
113:(pictured)
437:George Ho
409:George Ho
380:Prioryman
317:George Ho
296:George Ho
292:Gibraltar
243:George Ho
149:Prioryman
472:Category
223:Review 2
176:Review 1
127:Reviewed
58:promoted
357:Legoktm
141:ACP2011
111:skull
315:". --
16:<
459:talk
441:talk
413:talk
384:talk
361:talk
337:talk
333:Anne
321:talk
300:talk
281:talk
277:Anne
262:talk
258:Anne
247:talk
211:talk
207:Anne
153:talk
145:talk
66:talk
60:by
43:or
474::
378:"
129::
77:(
39:,
457:(
439:(
411:(
382:(
359:(
335:(
319:(
298:(
279:(
260:(
245:(
225::
209:(
178::
151:(
143:(
92:)
64:(
51:.
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
