197:
168:
371:
325:
378:
article; my own random sample of the references found no close paraphrasing. As noted in the other review, the image is from commons and carries the proper licensing, and looks good at the small size. Both the original and ALT1 hooks are supported by inline source citations. The article is neutral in
171:
New enough at time of nomination, mostly well explained (although the bit about the shell casings is a bit murky), hook fact occurs in the block quote, which has a ref before it, well referenced with no over-close paraphrasing found. Unfortunately the article is a bit lacking in length, because there
176:
that is 1,293 characters long without the block quote; this article therefore needs to be 6,465 characters without the block quote to meet the fivefold expansion requirement, and I make it 5,389. I suggest adding information about the list of names - see the
Commonwealth War Graves Commission source
328:
Now long enough: 7,631 characters by my count, so more than five times as long as the pre-existing section in the cemetery article. I checked a random selection of a little under half the references and found no overly close paraphrasing. The article is well referenced, clear, and neutral in tone,
283:
With a brand new password, I'm back in the game. I'm no expert at determining expansions; however, I do believe that I have met the 5x expansion requirement today. I have also addressed all the points that you mentioned above. Please note, that in my research for various monument articles, I rarely
211:
Thank you for your review. I wasn't aware of the rule about sections of articles. In the future, I'll be more careful when I create an article not to make a section too big if the section topic is appropriate for its own article. I anticipate having the expansion completed by tomorrow. In the
297:
I'm not ignoring this; thanks for taking the time to add more, I had a feeling you didn't realize pre-existing sections counted too, and I was trying to give you ideas. I'll check it out now if all the alarms elsewhere will keep it down to a dull roar :-)
284:
have come across information detailing the exact height of a specific war memorial. I've researched this monument on two separate occasions--for the North Front
Cemetery article and this article. I've never found the specific height information. Thank you.
181:
focal point for
Remembrance Day services, or whether they are sometimes held at the other memorial; clarifying that, especially if practice has changed, might be good. I also suggest adding an alt on the Pathé film as first film made in Gibraltar.
244:
I expanded the article last night and early this morning, with particular attention to clarifying the
Remembrance Sunday celebrations. I'll expand the article further later this morning. Real life is so intrusive!
329:
and both hooks are referenced. The picture has a suitable licence and looks clear at the small scale. Good to go (assuming a second passing review) with either hook, with the picture suitable for either.
374:
DYKcheck confirms that the article is long enough for a new article, and at 7,622 prose characters meets the 5x expansion requirement due to the inclusion of 1,293 characters of material from the
149:, Gibraltar-related articles are temporarily being reviewed by two individuals. In addition to the regular DYK criteria, at least one reviewer should also indicate whether they perceive any
115:
344:
Thank you for your review. I think the alternate DYK is more fun. And I appreciate your suggestions for expansion. It is a shame that all those alarm bells do seem to be ringing again.
260:
I've run into a problem that I don't know how to correct. About half an hour ago, my signature stopped working. Now they really have blacklisted me. I'm signing manually.
146:
423:
36:
269:
40:
17:
226:
200:
96:
153:
or promotional concerns about the article under review.IP addresses and
Victuallers are not allowed to do the reviews.
44:
79:
399:: I suggest that this article should be held over to November 11, as it seems best fitted for Remembrance Day.
101:
273:
384:
334:
303:
187:
375:
173:
404:
177:- and if possible the height of this specific cross. Plus I am a bit unclear about whether this is
137:
196:
29:
The following discussion is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below.
349:
289:
265:
261:
250:
129:
380:
330:
299:
218:
183:
400:
133:
417:
150:
167:
345:
285:
246:
125:
62:
370:
324:
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as
234:
379:
tone and non-promotional, and I see no basis for conflict of interest.
47:), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page.
195:
221:
116:
Template:Did you know nominations/Copyright law of Panama
84:
100:
commemorates the sailors, soldiers and airmen of the
233:represented the first motion picture ever made in
147:Knowledge talk:Did you know/GibraltarPediA Options
8:
49:No further edits should be made to this page
224:recorded at the dedication ceremony of the
424:Passed DYK nominations from October 2012
212:meantime, an alternate choice of hook:
7:
66: 18:09, 9 November 2012 (UTC)
24:
140:) at 22:15, 15 October 2012 (UTC)
18:Template:Did you know nominations
369:
323:
166:
104:who died in the two World Wars?
32:Please do not modify this page.
407:) 01:22, 30 October 2012 (UTC)
387:) 18:00, 9 November 2012 (UTC)
352:) 00:03, 20 October 2012 (UTC)
337:) 18:15, 19 October 2012 (UTC)
306:) 17:41, 19 October 2012 (UTC)
292:) 17:20, 19 October 2012 (UTC)
276:) 14:10, 19 October 2012 (UTC)
253:) 11:30, 19 October 2012 (UTC)
190:) 21:52, 17 October 2012 (UTC)
1:
172:is a pre-existing section at
227:Gibraltar Cross of Sacrifice
201:Gibraltar Cross of Sacrifice
97:Gibraltar Cross of Sacrifice
71:Gibraltar Cross of Sacrifice
45:Knowledge talk:Did you know
37:this nomination's talk page
440:
102:Commonwealth of Nations
41:the article's talk page
203:
145:Per the discussion at
199:
124:Created/expanded by
376:North Front Cemetery
174:North Front Cemetery
151:conflict of interest
204:
141:
132:). Nominated by
431:
373:
327:
170:
123:
56:The result was:
34:
439:
438:
434:
433:
432:
430:
429:
428:
414:
413:
412:
213:
91:
89:
85:Article history
73:
67:
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
437:
435:
427:
426:
416:
415:
411:
410:
409:
408:
391:
390:
389:
388:
367:
358:
357:
356:
355:
354:
353:
339:
338:
318:
317:
316:
315:
314:
313:
312:
311:
310:
309:
308:
307:
294:
293:
278:
277:
255:
254:
239:
238:
194:
193:
192:
191:
164:
155:
154:
121:
120:
119:
118:
106:
105:
88:
87:
82:
80:Back to T:TDYK
76:
74:
72:
69:
54:
53:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
436:
425:
422:
421:
419:
406:
402:
398:
395:
394:
393:
392:
386:
382:
377:
372:
368:
365:
362:
361:
360:
359:
351:
347:
343:
342:
341:
340:
336:
332:
326:
322:
321:
320:
319:
305:
301:
296:
295:
291:
287:
282:
281:
280:
279:
275:
271:
267:
263:
259:
258:
257:
256:
252:
248:
243:
242:
241:
240:
236:
232:
229:
228:
223:
220:
219:British Pathé
217:... that the
216:
210:
209:
208:
207:
206:
205:
202:
198:
189:
185:
180:
175:
169:
165:
162:
159:
158:
157:
156:
152:
148:
144:
143:
142:
139:
135:
131:
127:
117:
113:
110:
109:
108:
107:
103:
99:
98:
94:... that the
93:
92:
86:
83:
81:
78:
77:
70:
68:
65:
64:
59:
52:
50:
46:
42:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
396:
363:
230:
225:
214:
178:
160:
122:
111:
95:
61:
57:
55:
48:
31:
28:
381:BlueMoonset
331:Yngvadottir
300:Yngvadottir
270:24.7.222.55
184:Yngvadottir
231:(pictured)
401:Prioryman
235:Gibraltar
134:Prioryman
418:Category
364:Review 2
161:Review 1
112:Reviewed
58:promoted
397:Comment
126:ACP2011
63:Allen3
215:ALT 1
16:<
405:talk
385:talk
350:talk
346:Anne
335:talk
304:talk
290:talk
286:Anne
274:talk
266:talk
262:Anne
251:talk
247:Anne
222:film
188:talk
138:talk
130:talk
179:the
60:by
43:or
420::
268:)
114::
75:(
39:,
403:(
383:(
366::
348:(
333:(
302:(
288:(
272:(
264:(
249:(
237:?
186:(
163::
136:(
128:(
90:)
51:.
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
