388:
405:
161:
408:
Article is new enough (3 September), long enough (2,326 characters), fully referenced. I've created a cropped version of the image, which has a valid licence and OTRS. QPQ done. Hook verified against online reliable source in ref 13, although it would be better if ref 11 were not a blog. However, per
233:
She could hardly be a member of the group after her death, but aside from that, this nomination feels a bit ghoulish, as the poor woman hasn't even been cremated yet. (I know there isn't anything against the rules in submitting the article for DYK, but imagine how you'd feel if it was news of your
482:
I measured present iteration (take note below) at 2,141 characters. Satisfies the number rule of 1,500+ characters, except these 2,141 characters are virtually content-free except for her death. I did not even read a case for notability here. Article leaves me with no clue about basis of her
317:
If by that you are suggesting I have double standards, then you are way off base and I find it quite insulting. (I only give myself 10 take-offense points to hand out each month and you've made me use them all in one go).
265:
Pointing out that I've pointed out that there is no rule against it is missing the point. Consider the purpose of showing the article in DYK. I won't be approving it as I find the idea of displaying it in DYK distasteful.
348:
Sorry for going off on one then. I can't get the points back and I can't even swear about not being able to get them back as I must now be in a happy mood for the rest of the month. (I wouldn't have had any problem with
283:
You do not have to approve it yourself. Someone else can do that. We have posted several other articles concerning similar hooks. Your personal opinion does not trump the
Knowledge guidelines and rules on the matter.
249:
The nom points out that "she was a member". And as you yourself points out, there are no rules against submitting this article for DYk. Also the subjects death is no obstacle, just recently the article
94:
70:
Resolution of merge discussion was to merge (although given that the majority opposed this, it is hard to understand the closer's claom of consensus. Closing the nomination.
518:
89:
254:
and the hook there was accepted. That the "victim" this time is a young beautiful girl makes no difference than had she been an old man etc.--
36:
17:
357:
it. The hook is poorly phrased, but since the article is almost certainly going to merged we don't need to worry about that.)
44:
144:
84:
499:
114:
119:
387:
495:
418:
342:
65:
462:
206:
104:
467:
445:
289:
259:
251:
222:
214:
362:
323:
300:
271:
239:
192:
458:
181:
160:
40:
512:
414:
338:
99:
61:
404:
29:
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below.
337:
will move that one to a prep area.) Unsure if you can get your points back though.
334:
202:
441:
285:
255:
218:
210:
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as
358:
329:
Fortunately, I was suggesting no such thing. I merely meant that you may have
319:
296:
267:
235:
178:
234:
relation's recent death appearing in the main page's quirky trivia section).
170:
124:
353:
this article, I just thought it was inappropriate for DYK, so wouldn't
47:), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page.
312:? I couldn't even bear to look at that one, much less review it.
486:
Also, "2013-2014: Debut with Ladies' Code" section is uncited.
295:
Somebody else can indeed do it; I'd encourage them not to.
149:
457:
Note that there is a propose to merge this article to
184:
until her death in a car accident on 3 September 2014?
109:
411:References in the article must not be bare URLs
308:Didn't you review an article on the Auschwitz
333:standards. (And that I'm kind of hoping that
8:
49:No further edits should be made to this page
519:Failed DYK nominations from September 2014
72:
75:
7:
225:) at 21:20, 4 September 2014 (UTC)
24:
502:) 05:42, 11 September 2014 (UTC)
177:was a member of the South Korean
18:Template:Did you know nominations
403:
386:
345:) 02:44, 8 September 2014 (UTC)
326:) 02:09, 8 September 2014 (UTC)
292:) 13:37, 5 September 2014 (UTC)
262:) 13:17, 5 September 2014 (UTC)
159:
68:) 20:29, 19 September 2014 (UTC)
448:) 17:56, 6 September 2014 (UTC)
421:) 08:40, 6 September 2014 (UTC)
365:) 09:33, 8 September 2014 (UTC)
303:) 13:50, 5 September 2014 (UTC)
274:) 13:31, 5 September 2014 (UTC)
242:) 00:36, 5 September 2014 (UTC)
32:Please do not modify this page.
1:
475:07:49, 6 September 2014 (UTC)
45:Knowledge talk:Did you know
37:this nomination's talk page
535:
120:Find sources (notability)
95:Earwig's Copyvio Detector
409:Supplementary rule D3,
41:the article's talk page
110:A Simple Word Counter
90:Reviewer instructions
115:Reviewers' template
226:
133:
132:
526:
473:
465:
407:
390:
252:Willem Witteveen
217:). Nominated by
200:
163:
73:
56:The result was:
34:
534:
533:
529:
528:
527:
525:
524:
523:
509:
508:
507:
505:
472:
468:
463:
440:Done. Thanks.--
392:
193:Ghory and Dixit
165:
156:
154:
150:Article history
138:
129:
105:Character count
69:
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
532:
530:
522:
521:
511:
510:
493:
492:
491:
490:
487:
484:
477:
476:
470:
455:
454:
453:
452:
451:
450:
449:
431:
430:
429:
428:
427:
426:
425:
424:
423:
422:
384:
383:
382:
381:
380:
379:
378:
377:
376:
375:
374:
373:
372:
371:
370:
369:
368:
367:
366:
310:Sonderkommando
305:
304:
278:
277:
276:
275:
244:
243:
198:
197:
196:
195:
186:
185:
157:
153:
152:
147:
145:Back to T:TDYK
141:
139:
137:
134:
131:
130:
128:
127:
122:
117:
112:
107:
102:
97:
92:
87:
81:
78:
77:
54:
53:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
531:
520:
517:
516:
514:
506:
503:
501:
497:
496:Georgejdorner
489:DYK? No way!
488:
485:
481:
480:
479:
478:
474:
466:
460:
456:
447:
443:
439:
438:
437:
436:
435:
434:
433:
432:
420:
416:
412:
406:
402:
401:
400:
399:
398:
397:
396:
395:
394:
393:
391:
389:
364:
360:
356:
352:
347:
346:
344:
340:
336:
332:
328:
327:
325:
321:
316:
315:
314:
313:
311:
307:
306:
302:
298:
294:
293:
291:
287:
282:
281:
280:
279:
273:
269:
264:
263:
261:
257:
253:
248:
247:
246:
245:
241:
237:
232:
231:
230:
229:
228:
224:
220:
216:
212:
208:
204:
194:
190:
189:
188:
187:
183:
180:
176:
173:
172:
167:
166:
164:
162:
151:
148:
146:
143:
142:
135:
126:
123:
121:
118:
116:
113:
111:
108:
106:
103:
101:
98:
96:
93:
91:
88:
86:
83:
82:
80:
79:
74:
71:
67:
63:
59:
52:
50:
46:
42:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
504:
494:
459:Ladies' Code
410:
385:
354:
350:
330:
309:
199:
182:Ladies' Code
174:
169:
158:
57:
55:
48:
31:
28:
201:Created by
125:Hook length
76:DYK toolbox
471:complaint?
284:Regards,--
179:girl group
175:(pictured)
351:reviewing
331:different
191:Reviewed
171:Go Eun-bi
168:... that
136:Go Eun-bi
100:QPQ check
85:DYK check
513:Category
415:Hawkeye7
339:Hawkeye7
62:Hawkeye7
58:rejected
464:—
355:approve
335:Yoninah
203:Deoma12
442:BabbaQ
286:BabbaQ
256:BabbaQ
219:BabbaQ
211:BabbaQ
483:fame.
359:Belle
320:Belle
297:Belle
268:Belle
236:Belle
16:<
500:talk
469:Revi
446:talk
419:talk
363:talk
343:talk
324:talk
301:talk
290:talk
272:talk
260:talk
240:talk
223:talk
215:talk
207:talk
66:talk
209:),
60:by
43:or
515::
461:.
413:.
227:.
140:(
39:,
498:(
444:(
417:(
361:(
341:(
322:(
299:(
288:(
270:(
258:(
238:(
221:(
213:(
205:(
155:)
64:(
51:.
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
