391:
586:
413:
434:
511:
long enough now, and the tag issue has been resolved. I'm not sure about the hooks though; they imply that all hooch maids had sex with soldiers, though the article makes it clear that only some of them did. I'd suggest a simpler hook, perhaps something like the following.
125:
272:
I think with the full quote, it is explained a bit more, but I kept it in there for a kind of shock effect. If you think it would work the other way, then go for it. Another idea would be to say that they flirted with the soldiers, and also kept the plumbing clean.
416:
Date and sources look OK, but the article is too short - under 1,500 characters. This needs to be expanded if it's to qualify for DYK. Also, the clarification needed tag should be resolved.
133:: This is just one character over the limit, although I had to butcher the quote in order to fit it. If it is possible, I would love to incorporate the full quote so that it isn't butchered.
192:
Is the bit about them being good
Catholics necessary? I'm simply asking because shorter-is-better, and you're going to get plenty of hits even without the Catholic element.
621:
356:
Way better, although I would dispute "forced," since many did it out of a need for financial support for their family. Either way, I'm down for either hook.
36:
17:
213:
44:
81:
221:
I've seen the "good
Catholic" thing around on more than one site, and I meant it at the level of pay grade.
232:
This was because a lot of the
Catholics were more sympathetic to the cause and many other various factors.
399:
65:
566:, they were also described as being "good Catholics who ... would never date an American soldier"?
114:, they were also described as being "good Catholics who ... would never date an American soldier"?
594:
517:
421:
209:
556:
301:
were described as "good
Catholics who ... would never date an American soldier"? -- Better?
294:
250:
172:
103:
29:
The following discussion is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below.
589:
I don't mind either - I'll leave it to the closer's discretion. The article's good to go now.
266:
197:
576:
471:
395:
361:
328:
278:
237:
226:
145:
61:
40:
590:
513:
493:
452:
417:
346:
313:
205:
390:
323:
I find that a incredibly degrading towards women and do not support that idea at all.
615:
155:
262:
243:
I understand, but to me it seems distracting; you'll get plenty of hits with "that
193:
572:
563:
535:
467:
357:
334:
On the contrary, it was meant tongue in cheek for hookiness; but how is it now?
324:
298:
274:
258:
233:
222:
141:
111:
585:
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as
551:
530:
412:
289:
245:
98:
483:
442:
336:
303:
154:
Note: I just changed the punctuation a bit, and it's now 196 characters.
559:
254:
107:
47:), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page.
203:
Also, what do you mean with " women could as much as a captain "?--
126:
Imperial German plans for the invasion of the United States
86:
394:Reviewer needed now that hooks have been set.
148:). Self nom at 07:17, 23 December 2012 (UTC)
8:
571:If not, go for your hook, as it looks fine.
541:That works, although maybe we could do this:
49:No further edits should be made to this page
534:looked after American soldiers during the
622:Passed DYK nominations from December 2012
7:
481:I'm good with whichever you pick.
24:
18:Template:Did you know nominations
584:
432:
411:
389:
200:) 18:14, 26 December 2012 (UTC)
331:) 07:20, 19 January 2013 (UTC)
229:) 22:00, 31 December 2012 (UTC)
32:Please do not modify this page.
597:) 19:42, 25 January 2013 (UTC)
579:) 05:04, 25 January 2013 (UTC)
520:) 19:58, 23 January 2013 (UTC)
474:) 23:38, 22 January 2013 (UTC)
424:) 21:04, 21 January 2013 (UTC)
402:) 01:35, 21 January 2013 (UTC)
364:) 17:07, 19 January 2013 (UTC)
281:) 17:41, 1 January 2013 (UTC)
269:) 06:45, 1 January 2013 (UTC)
240:) 00:57, 1 January 2013 (UTC)
218:15:26, 27 December 2012 (UTC)
68:) 00:17, 26 January 2013 (UTC)
1:
466:What one's the hook? Thanks!
353:07:59, 19 January 2013 (UTC)
320:12:04, 18 January 2013 (UTC)
184:21:58, 23 December 2012 (UTC)
500:06:00, 23 January 2013 (UTC)
459:02:38, 22 January 2013 (UTC)
45:Knowledge talk:Did you know
37:this nomination's talk page
638:
549:: ... that although some
41:the article's talk page
140:Created/expanded by
297:soldiers during the
214:List of good deeds
96:... that although
257:clean during the
251:keep the plumbing
180:
176:
164:
160:
149:
110:clean during the
104:keep the plumbing
629:
588:
573:Kevin Rutherford
496:
486:
468:Kevin Rutherford
455:
445:
440:
436:
435:
415:
393:
358:Kevin Rutherford
349:
339:
325:Kevin Rutherford
316:
306:
275:Kevin Rutherford
234:Kevin Rutherford
223:Kevin Rutherford
217:
216:
185:
182:
178:
174:
170:
165:
162:
158:
139:
60:by —
56:The result was:
34:
637:
636:
632:
631:
630:
628:
627:
626:
612:
611:
610:
507:The article is
494:
484:
453:
443:
433:
431:
347:
337:
314:
304:
287:: ... that the
208:
204:
173:
168:
156:
153:
93:
91:
87:Article history
75:
69:
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
635:
633:
625:
624:
614:
613:
609:
608:
607:
606:
605:
604:
603:
602:
601:
600:
599:
598:
581:
580:
568:
567:
555:were known to
543:
542:
523:
522:
521:
502:
501:
476:
475:
461:
460:
426:
425:
406:
405:
404:
403:
384:
383:
382:
381:
380:
379:
378:
377:
376:
375:
374:
373:
372:
371:
370:
369:
368:
367:
366:
365:
249:were known to
230:
187:
186:
137:
136:
135:
134:
128:
116:
115:
102:were known to
90:
89:
84:
82:Back to T:TDYK
78:
76:
74:
71:
54:
53:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
634:
623:
620:
619:
617:
596:
592:
587:
583:
582:
578:
574:
570:
569:
565:
561:
558:
554:
553:
548:
545:
544:
540:
539:
537:
533:
532:
527:
524:
519:
515:
510:
506:
505:
504:
503:
499:
498:
497:
489:
487:
480:
479:
478:
477:
473:
469:
465:
464:
463:
462:
458:
457:
456:
448:
446:
439:
430:
429:
428:
427:
423:
419:
414:
410:
409:
408:
407:
401:
397:
392:
388:
387:
386:
385:
363:
359:
355:
354:
352:
351:
350:
342:
340:
333:
332:
330:
326:
322:
321:
319:
318:
317:
309:
307:
300:
296:
292:
291:
286:
283:
282:
280:
276:
271:
270:
268:
264:
260:
256:
252:
248:
247:
242:
241:
239:
235:
231:
228:
224:
220:
219:
215:
211:
207:
202:
201:
199:
195:
191:
190:
189:
188:
183:
166:
152:
151:
150:
147:
143:
132:
129:
127:
123:
120:
119:
118:
117:
113:
109:
105:
101:
100:
95:
94:
88:
85:
83:
80:
79:
72:
70:
67:
63:
59:
52:
50:
46:
42:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
550:
546:
529:
525:
508:
492:
491:
482:
451:
450:
441:
437:
345:
344:
335:
312:
311:
302:
288:
284:
244:
138:
130:
121:
97:
57:
55:
48:
31:
28:
564:Vietnam War
562:during the
552:hooch maids
536:Vietnam War
531:hooch maids
528:: ... that
396:BlueMoonset
299:Vietnam War
290:hooch maids
259:Vietnam War
246:hooch maids
112:Vietnam War
99:hooch maids
62:Crisco 1492
557:look after
438: Done
73:Hooch maid
591:Prioryman
514:Prioryman
418:Prioryman
206:Gilderien
616:Category
560:soldiers
490:–
488:(Robert)
449:–
447:(Robert)
343:–
341:(Robert)
310:–
308:(Robert)
295:serviced
255:soldiers
122:Reviewed
108:soldiers
58:promoted
263:Nyttend
194:Nyttend
131:Comment
212:|
171:
167:
142:Ktr101
16:<
595:talk
577:talk
547:ALT3
526:ALT2
518:talk
509:just
495:talk
485:Rcej
472:talk
454:talk
444:Rcej
422:talk
400:talk
362:talk
348:talk
338:Rcej
329:talk
315:talk
305:Rcej
293:who
285:ALT1
279:talk
267:talk
261:?"
238:talk
227:talk
210:Chat
198:talk
175:XAЯA
163:ARAX
146:talk
66:talk
253:of
106:of
43:or
618::
538:?
179:ИA
159:AN
124::
77:(
39:,
593:(
575:(
516:(
470:(
420:(
398:(
360:(
327:(
277:(
265:(
236:(
225:(
196:(
181:M
177:b
169:•
161:d
157:M
144:(
92:)
64:(
51:.
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.