372:
would be tagged as not correct or not well-enough sourced. (So many peer-reviewed articles are behind a paywall, argh) I ran reflinks on the cites, so can clean that bit up, no problem. The breeds are significant, as the comparisons across breeds have some real interesting things going on (particularly debunking claims that one breed has no ancestry from another, etc...) I'll see what I can do with the cats problem, thought they were OK, but I must have not checked properly.
30:
93:
400:
292:
371:
Oh heavens, not pumping up word count, just that the article was a fast creation off of work I was doing on a navbox template and I realized that we had no article on the topic! ;-) To the extent it's a bit light, I am not a geneticist and I wanted to be careful not to have things in there that
348:
My concern was that it appeared to be pumping up word count by creating lists in prose. I guess this one is OK, but I would have preferred a little more substance to the article. There are two more minor issues to resolve, though. First, please clean up the references; the publishers should be listed
323:
All excellent advice for if and when I take this article to GA, but what is actually needed to pass DYK? I see nothing on this in the criteria. I agree the article is start-class or c-class at best, but I don't see any reason that this doesn't pass DYK as it sits. I welcome improvements, of course,
300:
is worthwhile. I've made minor changes to the article; another concern is bare URLs in external links, which should be cleaned up. The article would also benefit from a short intro describing the horse genome, and splitting information about funding and research (ie - most of the first and second
477:, which is an FA and all sources there passed that review. Anthony 2007 book can be backed up by some other articles if needed, it's just there for sourcing dates of domestication, which is extensively discussed in the horse domestication article linked in the article. All should be fine.
295:
Created 1 April and nominated 2 April, and is about 2400 characters, satisfying date and length criteria. QPQ completed. However, I find that too much of the article consists of names of individuals, research centres, or horse breeds. Perhaps a small addition using one of numerous
349:
as, for example, "College of
Veterinary Medicine", not "Vet.cornell.edu". Second, there are two red-linked categories; either create and populate them, or delete them from the article. Once that's done, it's good to go. (BTW: I'm not sure why you're comparing to
472:
which is the same publisher source as the earlier links to the same publication, it's a free registration there (but I've noticed it's being a bit quirky at the moment). The stuff on leopard complex was the source cited in
468:
Thanks. I'll skip the image. You can be reassured that nothing changed for the hook. Some of the new material sources to existing refs. The new refs are, I think, all to other articles at
442:
for recent additions, as sources require registration or are offline. Regarding the photo, I think the background is too distracting to be included in DYK. That's just my opinion, of course.
172:
258:
503:
167:
324:
but I don't really have the time to pump this article up a lot at the moment. What is so critically flawed that it can't pass DYK? Compare, for example,
421:
Thank you! I added a bit more to the article today as well as some images. Should be helpful. (Should we add the photo of the horse to this hook?)
61:
17:
97:
222:
48:
162:
192:
197:
88:
448:
409:
403:
All issues addressed. (I've added a citation for part of the hook claim in the article.) Good to go.
359:
307:
279:
144:
56:. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page; such as this archived
182:
122:
76:
443:
404:
354:
302:
389:
Tweaked article, anything else? (I noted Bovine genome merely as a comparable article)
297:
478:
422:
390:
373:
328:
275:
140:
497:
439:
350:
325:
177:
117:
92:
29:
267:: First part of DYK sourced to footnote 1 in the article, second part to footnote 2
239:
42:
399:
247:, and horses have over 90 hereditary diseases similar to those found in humans?
291:
244:
474:
202:
301:
paragraphs) into a separate section, as I find it clutters the text.
107:. Unless there is consensus to re-open the archived discussion here.
227:
187:
282:). Self nominated at 18:09, 2 April 2013 (UTC)
8:
110:No further edits should be made to this page
150:
353:, as that one is too short to pass DYK.)
153:
37:The following is an archived discussion
504:Passed DYK nominations from April 2013
7:
24:
18:Template:Did you know nominations
398:
290:
91:
28:
54:Please do not modify this page
1:
147:) 15:22, 4 April 2013 (UTC).
520:
395:18:55, 3 April 2013 (UTC)
483:22:15, 3 April 2013 (UTC)
453:21:37, 3 April 2013 (UTC)
427:20:38, 3 April 2013 (UTC)
414:19:27, 3 April 2013 (UTC)
378:17:14, 3 April 2013 (UTC)
364:13:55, 3 April 2013 (UTC)
333:23:50, 2 April 2013 (UTC)
312:21:38, 2 April 2013 (UTC)
243:contains 2.7 billion DNA
198:Find sources (notability)
173:Earwig's Copyvio Detector
188:A Simple Word Counter
168:Reviewer instructions
118:talk page guidelines
193:Reviewers' template
298:scholarly articles
440:assume good faith
283:
211:
210:
511:
481:
451:
446:
425:
412:
407:
402:
393:
376:
362:
357:
331:
310:
305:
294:
273:
151:
135:The result was:
130:
113:
95:
71:, the nominated
38:
32:
519:
518:
514:
513:
512:
510:
509:
508:
494:
493:
492:
479:
449:
444:
423:
410:
405:
391:
374:
360:
355:
329:
308:
303:
234:
232:
228:Article history
216:
207:
183:Character count
148:
114:
108:
36:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
517:
515:
507:
506:
496:
495:
491:
490:
489:
488:
487:
486:
485:
484:
459:
458:
457:
456:
455:
454:
431:
430:
429:
428:
416:
415:
388:
387:
386:
385:
384:
383:
382:
381:
380:
379:
366:
365:
339:
338:
337:
336:
335:
334:
316:
315:
314:
313:
271:
270:
269:
268:
262:
259:King's Bastion
249:
248:
231:
230:
225:
223:Back to T:TDYK
219:
217:
215:
212:
209:
208:
206:
205:
200:
195:
190:
185:
180:
175:
170:
165:
159:
156:
155:
133:
132:
49:DYK nomination
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
516:
505:
502:
501:
499:
482:
476:
471:
467:
466:
465:
464:
463:
462:
461:
460:
452:
447:
441:
437:
436:
435:
434:
433:
432:
426:
420:
419:
418:
417:
413:
408:
401:
397:
396:
394:
377:
370:
369:
368:
367:
363:
358:
352:
351:bovine genome
347:
346:
345:
344:
343:
342:
341:
340:
332:
327:
326:Bovine Genome
322:
321:
320:
319:
318:
317:
311:
306:
299:
293:
289:
288:
287:
286:
285:
281:
277:
266:
263:
260:
256:
253:
252:
251:
250:
246:
242:
241:
237:... that the
236:
235:
229:
226:
224:
221:
220:
213:
204:
201:
199:
196:
194:
191:
189:
186:
184:
181:
179:
176:
174:
171:
169:
166:
164:
161:
160:
158:
157:
152:
149:
146:
142:
138:
131:
128:
126:
120:
119:
111:
106:
105:
101:
96:
94:
90:
85:
84:
80:
74:
70:
69:
65:
59:
55:
51:
50:
45:
44:
39:
31:
27:
26:
19:
469:
272:
264:
254:
240:horse genome
238:
214:Horse genome
136:
134:
129:information.
124:
116:
109:
103:
99:
89:Did you know
87:
82:
78:
72:
67:
63:
57:
53:
47:
43:Horse genome
41:
35:
34:
274:Created by
203:Hook length
154:DYK toolbox
245:base pairs
58:nomination
480:Montanabw
475:Appaloosa
470:The Horse
424:Montanabw
392:Montanabw
375:Montanabw
330:Montanabw
276:Montanabw
178:QPQ check
163:DYK check
141:Ashwin147
86:, or the
498:Category
255:Reviewed
137:promoted
115:See the
265:Comment
73:article
450:matrix
411:matrix
361:matrix
309:matrix
261:- done
33:
438:I'll
16:<
445:Mind
406:Mind
356:Mind
304:Mind
280:talk
145:talk
125:more
121:for
104:page
100:talk
83:page
79:talk
68:page
64:talk
257::
139:by
75:'s
60:"s
46:'s
40:of
500::
284:.
218:(
102:)
81:)
66:)
52:.
278:(
233:)
143:(
127:)
123:(
112:.
98:(
77:(
62:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
