160:
488:
memories of theirs, doesn't work for those of us who happen to have heard Bach long before we heard Handel and
Telemann. "Reminiscent" refers to memories of the past, so, reminiscent to whom? They could all have fed off each other's ideas contemporaneously, and without detailed analysis of who was inspired by whom with respect to which dots precisely, that's the best we can guess. I would suggest substituting "not unlike" for "reminiscent of".
744:
690:
621:
726:. - You don't have to do anything. German or not, there's a bulk of writing within the image, and it could be quoted and translated, but where would that be? I saw it quoted somewhere, and forgot where ... (The bot is not dumb, can probably overlook lines below the approval.) - The rest is just ranting a bit. LouisAlain was my best helper until he was banned by "the community".--
444:
436:
425:
396:
388:
359:
339:
328:
299:
288:
472:
708:
Thank you! I wonder where in the new article I might place the elaborate image caption of the original engraving which supports some of his functions. Also, as usual, the new article cries for several other red links to be blued. His French article, btw, dates back to 2011, by LouisAlain, who would
487:
One minor issue of wording. Re "The scoring of flute, violin and continuo is reminiscent of countless trio sonatas by George
Frideric Handel, Georg Philipp Telemann and others": Handel and Telemann were contemporaries of J.S. Bach, so saying that J.S. Bach's work is inspiring us to recall earlier
93:
506:
Thank you so much for a fast and detailed review. Is there a better word than "reminiscent". The idea is "makes you think", not of something earlier. It's quite surprising to be reminded of entertaining music in a memorial service.
40:
36:
172:
790:
206:
88:
607:
Thank you for the reminder that this is for 6 and the one I wanted to do is for 7, will do this guy first, rather soon. Perhaps watch the red link temporarily. --
596:, so we need the special occasion slot. Let's all hope we can work together quickly to help the promoters do this in the short time we have? Thank you.
762:, or anybody else, please move the template on this page from where it is to special occasions, creating space for 6 February. I am not allowed. --
538:
566:
Thank you both, "evokes" taken. Perhaps wait until I created the bio, which may be tomorrow if we don't learn of another recent death. --
739:
I'm not sure if you are asking for anything here? Is there anything I can do? I cannot research those articles as I cannot read German.
159:
628:(currently a red link in the hook), and the hook is designed for the 6 February slot. So we are not expecting promotion to prep yet.
17:
345:
353:
44:
625:
184:
322:
534:
143:
430:
382:
293:
282:
83:
349:
197:
767:
731:
714:
655:
644:
612:
571:
512:
246:
238:
113:
752:
702:
633:
601:
560:
530:
523:
497:
259:
214:: We need to say cantata because there's a motet of the same name. The red link will turn blue. Best on
118:
230:
419:
722:
I reply here above to not give you more work ;) - Please indent according to the essay at
763:
727:
710:
682:
651:
640:
608:
579:
567:
550:
508:
480:
242:
234:
103:
624:
To admin: this nom has passed DYK in itself, but it awaits the publication and DYK review of
333:
759:
748:
723:
698:
629:
597:
556:
519:
493:
483:
for a thorough examination of this Bach cantata. It was promoted to GA on 27 January 2022.
255:
587:
476:
226:
65:
784:
542:
98:
650:
I am going to use the so far only ref also for the cantata, please keep watching. --
29:
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below.
743:
689:
620:
492:
If we can resolve this small matter of wording, this nom should be good to go.
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as
709:
create the blues in no time, but
Knowledge (XXG) expels such helpers, sigh. --
471:
123:
61:
191:
47:), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page.
412:
Image is freely licensed, used in the article, and clear at 100px.
315:
Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems
148:
405:
368:
308:
268:
183:, was first performed during a memorial service for
108:
375:Hook has been verified by provided inline citation
135:
Ich lasse dich nicht, du segnest mich denn, BWV 157
529:"evokes" is more active language, in my opinion
592:Just putting a reminder for others here that
8:
49:No further edits should be made to this page
639:And now a start is there for the person. --
693:Good to go now, for special occasion slot
174:Ich lasse dich nicht, du segnest mich denn
71:
594:this nom and hook are aimed at 6 February
791:Passed DYK nominations from January 2022
74:
555:Please see above comments? Thank you.
275:Article is new enough and long enough
7:
68:) 00:27, 2 February 2022 (UTC)
249:) at 00:07, 28 January 2022 (UTC).
24:
45:Knowledge (XXG) talk:Did you know
18:Template:Did you know nominations
742:
688:
619:
470:
442:
434:
423:
394:
386:
357:
337:
326:
297:
286:
158:
755:) 16:31, 1 February 2022 (UTC)
717:) 11:57, 1 February 2022 (UTC)
705:) 11:43, 1 February 2022 (UTC)
636:) 10:11, 1 February 2022 (UTC)
615:) 10:04, 1 February 2022 (UTC)
604:) 09:59, 1 February 2022 (UTC)
574:) 09:39, 1 February 2022 (UTC)
563:) 09:35, 1 February 2022 (UTC)
545:) 06:34, 1 February 2022 (UTC)
526:) 21:41, 30 January 2022 (UTC)
500:) 18:20, 30 January 2022 (UTC)
32:Please do not modify this page.
770:) 00:02, 2 February 2022 (UTC)
734:) 17:30, 1 February 2022 (UTC)
658:) 11:41, 1 February 2022 (UTC)
647:) 11:29, 1 February 2022 (UTC)
262:) 17:23, 30 January 2022 (UTC)
1:
626:Johann Christoph von Ponickau
185:Johann Christoph von Ponickau
164:Johann Christoph von Ponickau
453:
37:this nomination's talk page
807:
119:Find sources (notability)
94:Earwig's Copyvio Detector
170:... that Bach's cantata
41:the article's talk page
681:Wow, that was quick,
254:I shall review this.
109:A Simple Word Counter
89:Reviewer instructions
346:copyright violations
194:on 6 February 1727?
114:Reviewers' template
354:close paraphrasing
464:
463:
452:
451:
404:
403:
367:
366:
323:Adequate sourcing
307:
306:
250:
199:
132:
131:
798:
746:
724:User talk:Drmies
692:
623:
618:(edit conflict)
591:
583:
554:
531:theleekycauldron
518:"Evocative of"?
474:
454:
446:
445:
441:Clear at 100px:
438:
437:
427:
426:
406:
398:
397:
390:
389:
369:
361:
360:
341:
340:
330:
329:
309:
301:
300:
290:
289:
269:
241:). Nominated by
224:
195:
179:
162:
72:
56:The result was:
34:
806:
805:
801:
800:
799:
797:
796:
795:
781:
780:
779:
585:
577:
548:
443:
435:
431:Used in article
424:
420:Freely licensed
395:
387:
358:
338:
327:
298:
287:
266:
207:Milam Residence
177:
167:
166:
165:
155:
153:
149:Article history
137:
128:
104:Character count
69:
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
804:
802:
794:
793:
783:
782:
778:
777:
776:
775:
774:
773:
772:
771:
740:
737:
736:
735:
686:
678:
677:
676:
675:
674:
673:
672:
671:
670:
669:
668:
667:
666:
665:
664:
663:
662:
661:
660:
659:
648:
490:
489:
462:
461:
450:
449:
448:
447:
439:
428:
414:
413:
402:
401:
400:
399:
391:
377:
376:
365:
364:
363:
362:
342:
331:
317:
316:
305:
304:
303:
302:
291:
277:
276:
264:
263:
222:
221:
220:
219:
209:
163:
157:
156:
152:
151:
146:
144:Back to T:TDYK
140:
138:
136:
133:
130:
129:
127:
126:
121:
116:
111:
106:
101:
96:
91:
86:
80:
77:
76:
54:
53:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
803:
792:
789:
788:
786:
769:
765:
761:
757:
756:
754:
750:
745:
741:
738:
733:
729:
725:
721:
720:
719:
718:
716:
712:
707:
706:
704:
700:
696:
691:
687:
684:
680:
679:
657:
653:
649:
646:
642:
638:
637:
635:
631:
627:
622:
617:
616:
614:
610:
606:
605:
603:
599:
595:
589:
581:
576:
575:
573:
569:
565:
564:
562:
558:
552:
547:
546:
544:
540:
536:
532:
528:
527:
525:
521:
517:
516:
514:
510:
505:
504:
503:
502:
501:
499:
495:
486:
485:
484:
482:
478:
473:
468:
459:
456:
455:
440:
432:
429:
421:
418:
417:
416:
415:
411:
408:
407:
393:Interesting:
392:
384:
381:
380:
379:
378:
374:
371:
370:
355:
351:
347:
343:
335:
332:
324:
321:
320:
319:
318:
314:
311:
310:
295:
292:
284:
281:
280:
279:
278:
274:
271:
270:
267:
261:
257:
253:
252:
251:
248:
244:
240:
236:
232:
228:
217:
213:
210:
208:
204:
201:
200:
198:
193:
189:
186:
182:
181:
175:
169:
168:
161:
150:
147:
145:
142:
141:
134:
125:
122:
120:
117:
115:
112:
110:
107:
105:
102:
100:
97:
95:
92:
90:
87:
85:
82:
81:
79:
78:
73:
70:
67:
63:
59:
52:
50:
46:
42:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
764:Gerda Arendt
728:Gerda Arendt
711:Gerda Arendt
694:
685:! Thank you.
652:Gerda Arendt
641:Gerda Arendt
609:Gerda Arendt
593:
580:Gerda Arendt
568:Gerda Arendt
551:Gerda Arendt
509:Gerda Arendt
491:
481:Gerda Arendt
466:
465:
457:
409:
372:
312:
272:
265:
243:Gerda Arendt
235:Gerda Arendt
223:
215:
211:
202:
187:
173:
171:
57:
55:
48:
31:
28:
760:Storye book
749:Storye book
699:Storye book
630:Storye book
598:Storye book
557:Storye book
520:Storye book
494:Storye book
475:Thank you,
294:Long enough
256:Storye book
225:Created by
124:Hook length
75:DYK toolbox
695:6 February
588:Nikkimaria
477:Nikkimaria
350:plagiarism
283:New enough
227:Nikkimaria
216:6 February
188:(pictured)
747:for bot.
99:QPQ check
84:DYK check
785:Category
539:contribs
460:: Done.
344:Free of
273:General:
203:Reviewed
196:Source:
58:promoted
541:) (she/
467:Overall
334:Neutral
313:Policy:
212:Comment
410:Image:
352:, and
233:) and
192:Pomßen
178:
758:You,
683:Gerda
383:Cited
373:Hook:
176:, BWV
16:<
768:talk
753:talk
732:talk
715:talk
703:talk
656:talk
645:talk
634:talk
613:talk
602:talk
584:and
572:talk
561:talk
543:they
535:talk
524:talk
513:talk
498:talk
479:and
260:talk
247:talk
239:talk
231:talk
66:talk
62:SL93
458:QPQ
190:in
180:157
60:by
43:or
787::
697:.
537:•
515:)
507:--
469::
433::
422::
385::
356::
348:,
336::
325::
296::
285::
205::
139:(
39:,
766:(
751:(
730:(
713:(
701:(
654:(
643:(
632:(
611:(
600:(
590::
586:@
582::
578:@
570:(
559:(
553::
549:@
533:(
522:(
511:(
496:(
258:(
245:(
237:(
229:(
218:.
154:)
64:(
51:.
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
