302:
Engelhardt of his financial assets" is not, and is especially confusing given that
Engelhardt somehow gains ownership of an entire island in the next sentence. Since the hook hangs on it, I have to say that "spreading racism" and "transmitting a 'racist worldview' " do not strike me as equivalent. The quote in the latter should be referenced by the end of the sentence in which it appears, as indeed should each quote, even within the same paragraph. (Multi-sentence quotes should be cited right after the quote's end.) I have adjusted all the long quotes (in the review section) so that they are blockquotes per the manual of style (see
409:, at this stage you can approve the hook if the nomination passes the criteria (which would mean adding the appropriate tick below), but as reviewer that's as far as you should go—it's what I meant by "finish the review". The actual promotion to prep needs to be by someone other than the reviewer or nominator—among other things, it means that another editor gets to check the approved nomination as part of the promotion, just to make sure nothing was overlooked.
445:
234:
337:
Thanks, Smetanahue. One thing: the "racist worldview" quote must, as noted above, be cited no later than the end of the sentence in which it occurs, and this applies to the intro of the article in addition to the body (quoted material is one exception to the general rule of omitting inline citations
310:
implications: even though the novel is being "accused of spreading racism", that effectively accuses the author, and since this is one reviewer, who was counteraccused of dishonesty(!) by 17 signatories, if I'm reading this right (also a potential BLP issue), it may be ultimately overweighting his
301:
It is true that plot sections generally don't need references for the reason given, though if aspects are open to interpretation, then it's best to cite those, since in that case the interpretation used should be from a reliable source. Plots should still be written in encyclopedic prose—"pigeons
93:
326:
Posted an alternative hook. Reworded "pigeons". Clarified that the island is bought on credit. I don't see a BLP problem since it's the summary of a public debate, and all accusations are attributed.
311:
opinion. Finally, I see four previous DYKs, in 2011 and 2012. This will be the fifth DYK, and therefore will not need a quid pro quo review, though any future nominations will require a QPQ.
257:
476:
260:, second to last paragraph. The hook is cited in the section about the political reaction, although it's been jumbled a bit now, I'll try to make it more clear.
241:
The hook has fewer than 200 characters, interesting and neutral but is not cited with sources. QPQ check is currently unavailable due to the tool not working.
88:
36:
338:
for the intro section if the material also appears in the body and is cited there). This is not only a DYK requirement, but a MOS rule as well.
17:
372:
Third opinion here: so long as we're clear that it was just an accusation, I don't think there's a BLP issue. —
40:
44:
143:
83:
193:
166:
453:
437:
287:
246:
113:
414:
396:
377:
343:
316:
118:
354:
350:
331:
327:
303:
265:
261:
222:
218:
65:
256:
Plot sections generally don't need references, as the work itself is assumed to be the source. See
449:
433:
406:
391:, I think you can finish the review now. I've struck the original hook; ALT1 remains in play.
388:
283:
242:
103:
427:
410:
392:
373:
339:
312:
277:
187:
160:
61:
470:
307:
237:
The article was created on the day of the nomination, long enough and within policy.
98:
29:
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below.
444:
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as
233:
198:
was debated in German newspapers in 2012 when it was accused of signaling a "
123:
171:
was debated in German newspapers in 2012 when it was accused of spreading
239:
However, it is not within policy since the plot section is unreferenced.
199:
172:
47:), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page.
258:
Knowledge:Manual of Style/Writing about fiction#Plot summaries
148:
108:
448:The hook meets all the criteria now. Good to go.
306:). On another front, I'm a bit worried about the
225:). Self-nominated at 13:12, 18 June 2015 (UTC).
8:
49:No further edits should be made to this page
282:can you give a second opinion pls? Thanks.
71:
74:
477:Passed DYK nominations from June 2015
7:
24:
18:Template:Did you know nominations
443:
232:
32:Please do not modify this page.
432:. I will "finish the review".
1:
346:) 16:54, 22 June 2015 (UTC)
334:) 16:41, 22 June 2015 (UTC)
456:) 15:04, 23 June 2015 (UTC)
440:) 15:04, 23 June 2015 (UTC)
417:) 13:50, 23 June 2015 (UTC)
399:) 23:37, 22 June 2015 (UTC)
380:) 23:19, 22 June 2015 (UTC)
357:) 17:03, 22 June 2015 (UTC)
319:) 14:56, 22 June 2015 (UTC)
290:) 05:36, 20 June 2015 (UTC)
268:) 13:25, 20 June 2015 (UTC)
249:) 18:23, 19 June 2015 (UTC)
68:) 05:30, 11 July 2015 (UTC)
45:Knowledge talk:Did you know
37:this nomination's talk page
493:
119:Find sources (notability)
94:Earwig's Copyvio Detector
135:Imperium (Kracht novel)
41:the article's talk page
109:A Simple Word Counter
89:Reviewer instructions
114:Reviewers' template
226:
132:
131:
484:
447:
431:
281:
236:
216:
188:Christian Kracht
161:Christian Kracht
72:
56:The result was:
34:
492:
491:
487:
486:
485:
483:
482:
481:
467:
466:
465:
425:
387:Thanks, Chris.
275:
155:
153:
149:Article history
137:
128:
104:Character count
69:
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
490:
488:
480:
479:
469:
468:
464:
463:
462:
461:
460:
459:
458:
457:
441:
419:
418:
401:
400:
382:
381:
374:Chris Woodrich
369:
368:
367:
366:
365:
364:
363:
362:
361:
360:
359:
358:
321:
320:
294:
293:
292:
291:
272:
271:
270:
269:
251:
250:
214:
213:
212:
211:
206:
205:
204:
203:
178:
177:
152:
151:
146:
144:Back to T:TDYK
140:
138:
136:
133:
130:
129:
127:
126:
121:
116:
111:
106:
101:
96:
91:
86:
80:
77:
76:
54:
53:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
489:
478:
475:
474:
472:
455:
451:
446:
442:
439:
435:
429:
423:
422:
421:
420:
416:
412:
408:
405:
404:
403:
402:
398:
394:
390:
386:
385:
384:
383:
379:
375:
371:
370:
356:
352:
348:
347:
345:
341:
336:
335:
333:
329:
325:
324:
323:
322:
318:
314:
309:
305:
304:WP:Blockquote
300:
299:
298:
297:
296:
295:
289:
285:
279:
274:
273:
267:
263:
259:
255:
254:
253:
252:
248:
244:
240:
235:
231:
230:
229:
228:
227:
224:
220:
210:
209:
208:
207:
201:
197:
196:
195:
189:
185:
182:
181:
180:
179:
176:
174:
170:
169:
168:
162:
157:
156:
150:
147:
145:
142:
141:
134:
125:
122:
120:
117:
115:
112:
110:
107:
105:
102:
100:
97:
95:
92:
90:
87:
85:
82:
81:
79:
78:
73:
70:
67:
63:
59:
52:
50:
46:
42:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
450:Vincent60030
434:Vincent60030
407:Vincent60030
389:Vincent60030
284:Vincent60030
243:Vincent60030
238:
215:
192:
191:
183:
165:
164:
158:
57:
55:
48:
31:
28:
428:BlueMoonset
411:BlueMoonset
393:BlueMoonset
349:OK, fixed.
340:BlueMoonset
313:BlueMoonset
278:BlueMoonset
217:Created by
202:worldview"?
186:: ... that
124:Hook length
75:DYK toolbox
351:Smetanahue
328:Smetanahue
262:Smetanahue
219:Smetanahue
62:Cwmhiraeth
190:'s novel
163:'s novel
159:... that
99:QPQ check
84:DYK check
471:Category
194:Imperium
167:Imperium
58:promoted
424:Sorry,
308:WP:BLP
200:racist
173:racism
16:<
454:talk
438:talk
415:talk
397:talk
378:talk
355:talk
344:talk
332:talk
317:talk
288:talk
266:talk
247:talk
223:talk
184:ALT1
66:talk
60:by
43:or
473::
139:(
39:,
452:(
436:(
430::
426:@
413:(
395:(
376:(
353:(
342:(
330:(
315:(
286:(
280::
276:@
264:(
245:(
221:(
175:?
154:)
64:(
51:.
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
