211:
346:
238:. Admittedly I rushed this nomination a bit, as I didn't have time to fully expand it before the 7-day deadline. I'll expand it by the end of the weekend; this should hopefully also make the notability more clear (for what it's worth, a quick search on Google Scholar comes up with 71 citations alone for just The Lexden Tumulus, and another 33 for Bronze boar figurines in iron age and Roman Britain). --
305:
318:, do you want to proceed with this nomination? If so, do you have a QPQ review for it? If you do, I would suggest including the words "high quality" before "Iron Age metalsmiths" in the hook, as the source indicates that it was not any or all smiths who might have been itinerant, but producers of high quality goods. What do you think?
354:
raised the issue of notability of the subject. I don't see anything in the DYK rules or supplementary rules about notability - I tend to agree that I am not sure it's been convincingly demonstrated in the article, but that's a different question from whether the subject meets notability guidelines or
279:
Also butting in: I don't know much about Iron Age industry, but I would not have made that assumption, as smiths need forges. The article is still not long enough, still doesn't make notability clear, and has more in the lede than in the Career section. Also, I have just looked at the source for that
349:
As I said above, the article is now just long enough, it was new enough when nominated, it is neutral, has sufficient referencing (AGF for offline sources), and has no copyvio. The hook is, in my opinion, interesting enough, though probably more about Iron Age smiths than about the subject of the
308:
I have done a bit of editing on this article, placing some of the information that was in the lede into the body of the article, and adjusting the info on the metalsmiths as per my comment above. The article was new enough when nominated, and is now just long enough (1590 characters of prose, not
214:
The main fault is that the article falls a long way short of the DYK requirement for "a minimum of 1500 characters of readable prose". Also, all we really learn about Ms Foster is her subject and where she was teaching in 2014. I hardly ever raise the question of
93:
219:, but if this article shows notability, then all academics with a few published articles are notable. Also, no QPQ done yet. If you do not need to do one, it's helpful to have a note on that.
185:
284:
goods may have been itinerant, and that they may have produced a group of pieces at a single stop on their journeying, which is not quite what the article and hook say.
396:
88:
366:
Yes, if notability is a concern that should be handled at Afd, not here. I'm pretty sure myself she would pass, though flying rather low over the bar.
355:
not (I don't know). I will approve the hook, and leave it to promoters and approving admins to decide if that's an issue affecting DYK eligibility.
36:
268:
Butting in - I thought just about everyone always thought that Iron Age metalsmiths in
Britain were more or less itinerant in most places?
17:
44:
143:
338:
243:
199:
83:
360:
323:
289:
113:
118:
65:
40:
334:
315:
258:
250:
239:
224:
195:
280:
statement (someone else's article, not Foster's), which actually says that metalsmiths producing
371:
356:
330:
319:
285:
273:
103:
169:
160:
61:
351:
254:
235:
220:
216:
390:
98:
210:
29:
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below.
367:
269:
345:
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as
304:
123:
333:, and for your edits. QPQ added above, and edited the hook accordingly. --
165:
47:), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page.
172:
might have been itinerant rather than having a fixed abode?
148:
108:
253:, but I am not going to be about for a few days.
202:). Self-nominated at 23:04, 6 August 2019 (UTC).
309:including the lede). Earwig shows no copyvio.
8:
49:No further edits should be made to this page
71:
397:Passed DYK nominations from August 2019
74:
168:metalsmiths of high-quality goods in
7:
350:article. A QPQ has now been done.
24:
363:) 13:55, 15 September 2019 (UTC)
341:) 07:45, 15 September 2019 (UTC)
326:) 08:36, 14 September 2019 (UTC)
45:Knowledge (XXG) talk:Did you know
18:Template:Did you know nominations
374:) 17:43, 15 September 2019 (UTC)
344:
303:
209:
68:) 05:47, 16 September 2019 (UTC)
32:Please do not modify this page.
276:) 03:02, 19 August 2019 (UTC)
249:I'll wait for you to ping me,
1:
292:) 17:18, 28 August 2019 (UTC)
261:) 20:19, 8 August 2019 (UTC)
246:) 16:07, 7 August 2019 (UTC)
227:) 12:11, 7 August 2019 (UTC)
37:this nomination's talk page
413:
329:Thanks for the reminder,
119:Find sources (notability)
94:Earwig's Copyvio Detector
234:Thanks for the review,
41:the article's talk page
158:... that according to
186:Lynching of Jay Lynch
109:A Simple Word Counter
89:Reviewer instructions
114:Reviewers' template
203:
132:
131:
404:
348:
307:
213:
193:
72:
56:The result was:
34:
412:
411:
407:
406:
405:
403:
402:
401:
387:
386:
385:
310:
161:Jennifer Foster
155:
153:
149:Article history
137:
135:Jennifer Foster
128:
104:Character count
69:
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
410:
408:
400:
399:
389:
388:
384:
383:
382:
381:
380:
379:
378:
377:
376:
375:
335:Usernameunique
316:Usernameunique
312:
311:
300:
299:
298:
297:
296:
295:
294:
293:
263:
262:
251:Usernameunique
247:
240:Usernameunique
229:
228:
196:Usernameunique
191:
190:
189:
188:
179:
174:
173:
152:
151:
146:
144:Back to T:TDYK
140:
138:
136:
133:
130:
129:
127:
126:
121:
116:
111:
106:
101:
96:
91:
86:
80:
77:
76:
54:
53:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
409:
398:
395:
394:
392:
373:
369:
365:
364:
362:
358:
353:
347:
343:
342:
340:
336:
332:
328:
327:
325:
321:
317:
314:
313:
306:
302:
301:
291:
287:
283:
278:
277:
275:
271:
267:
266:
265:
264:
260:
256:
252:
248:
245:
241:
237:
233:
232:
231:
230:
226:
222:
218:
212:
208:
207:
206:
205:
204:
201:
197:
187:
183:
180:
178:
177:
176:
175:
171:
167:
163:
162:
157:
156:
150:
147:
145:
142:
141:
134:
125:
122:
120:
117:
115:
112:
110:
107:
105:
102:
100:
97:
95:
92:
90:
87:
85:
82:
81:
79:
78:
73:
70:
67:
63:
59:
52:
50:
46:
42:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
357:RebeccaGreen
331:RebeccaGreen
320:RebeccaGreen
286:RebeccaGreen
282:high quality
281:
192:
181:
159:
57:
55:
48:
31:
28:
194:Created by
124:Hook length
75:DYK toolbox
62:Cwmhiraeth
352:Moonraker
255:Moonraker
236:Moonraker
221:Moonraker
99:QPQ check
84:DYK check
391:Category
182:Reviewed
166:Iron Age
58:promoted
368:Johnbod
270:Johnbod
170:Britain
16:<
372:talk
361:talk
339:talk
324:talk
290:talk
274:talk
259:talk
244:talk
225:talk
217:WP:N
200:talk
66:talk
60:by
43:or
393::
184::
164:,
139:(
39:,
370:(
359:(
337:(
322:(
288:(
272:(
257:(
242:(
223:(
198:(
154:)
64:(
51:.
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
