Knowledge

Template:Did you know nominations/Kappa V Archaeological Site

Source 📝

284:
because you've added an extra link that is going to distract many readers. You'll note that the photo is a waterside image, showing part of the site underwater; your typical reader should observe a connection between "destroyed by water" and a shoreline picture. Finally, let me remind you that at DYK we put (pictured) after the link to the article that's the subject of the DYK; you're suggesting to the reader that wave wash erosion is the actual subject and that we accidentally bolded the wrong link.
94: 297: 199: 283:
Why? Remember, shorter is better, and its period of origin is completely irrelevant to its destruction. There are tons of Archaic sites (the thing about this one is that it was larger and better preserved than most), so there's no benefit and an actual negative aspect to your proposal, in part
242:
Now this new term would make the whole thing interesting to me (as a reader) and I would click, because without it, I might have thought "some average archeological site disappeared, who cares? - what is pictured? nothing". I
170:
Not needed and not helpful: the fact that large amounts of damage have been done is sufficient for the intro, and "more than half" would be excessive simplification for the chunk whereon the hook is based.
213:
Secretlondon, once you read the article, you will see that the hook fact appears immediately before the third citation to page 2 of reference 2. Meanwhile, the name of the period is "
336: 125: 36: 221:
was passed through DYK without any dates or anything more specific than Terminal Archaic for a period, and two of my last four archaeological DYKs (
202:
detailed article, offline sources accepted AGF. I would be interested in a date or name of a period - since the picture doesn't give a clue, --
155:
can you include the words "more than half" in the article? Its not clear to me reading it quickly that the hook fact is in the article
17: 40: 260: 218: 214: 255: 103: 44: 77: 93: 217:"; the sources don't give any dates or period names more specific than that. You'll notice that the related 305: 277: 207: 187: 160: 29:
The following discussion is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below.
301: 289: 273: 234: 203: 183: 176: 145: 156: 264: 111: 296: 330: 285: 230: 172: 141: 133:: Hook depends on the penultimate sentence of the "Geographic context" section. 35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as
198: 61: 47:), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. 229:) have gone through without mentioning date or culture in the hook. 226: 222: 82: 8: 49:No further edits should be made to this page 148:). Self nom at 21:56, 22 August 2012 (UTC) 337:Passed DYK nominations from August 2012 182:The hook needs to be in the article. 7: 24: 292:) 12:42, 12 September 2012 (UTC) 280:) 06:03, 12 September 2012 (UTC) 237:) 04:16, 12 September 2012 (UTC) 210:) 10:45, 11 September 2012 (UTC) 18:Template:Did you know nominations 308:) 12:52, 12 September 2012 (UTC) 295: 197: 190:) 14:53, 11 September 2012 (UTC) 92: 253:... that more than half of the 101:... that more than half of the 32:Please do not modify this page. 219:Epsilon II Archaeological Site 179:) 16:43, 30 August 2012 (UTC) 64:16:59, 12 September 2012 (UTC) 1: 163:) 10:54, 30 August 2012 (UTC) 256:Kappa V Archaeological Site 104:Kappa V Archaeological Site 69:Kappa V Archaeological Site 45:Knowledge talk:Did you know 37:this nomination's talk page 353: 261:terminal archaic period 41:the article's talk page 263:has been destroyed by 110:has been destroyed by 140:Created/expanded by 108:(flooding pictured) 265:wave wash erosion 149: 112:wave wash erosion 344: 299: 215:Terminal Archaic 201: 139: 96: 56:The result was: 34: 352: 351: 347: 346: 345: 343: 342: 341: 327: 326: 325: 98: 89: 87: 83:Article history 71: 65: 30: 22: 21: 20: 12: 11: 5: 350: 348: 340: 339: 329: 328: 324: 323: 322: 321: 320: 319: 318: 317: 316: 315: 314: 313: 312: 311: 310: 309: 245: 244: 194: 193: 192: 191: 165: 164: 137: 136: 135: 134: 128: 116: 115: 90: 86: 85: 80: 78:Back to T:TDYK 74: 72: 70: 67: 54: 53: 25: 23: 15: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 349: 338: 335: 334: 332: 307: 303: 298: 294: 293: 291: 287: 282: 281: 279: 275: 271: 269: 266: 262: 258: 257: 250: 247: 246: 241: 240: 239: 238: 236: 232: 228: 224: 220: 216: 212: 211: 209: 205: 200: 196: 195: 189: 185: 181: 180: 178: 174: 169: 168: 167: 166: 162: 158: 154: 153: 152: 151: 150: 147: 143: 132: 129: 127: 123: 120: 119: 118: 117: 113: 109: 106: 105: 100: 99: 97: 95: 84: 81: 79: 76: 75: 68: 66: 63: 59: 52: 50: 46: 42: 38: 33: 27: 26: 19: 302:Gerda Arendt 274:Gerda Arendt 267: 254: 252: 248: 204:Gerda Arendt 184:Secretlondon 138: 130: 126:Sendai River 121: 107: 102: 91: 57: 55: 48: 31: 28: 157:Victuallers 268:(pictured) 223:Hovey Lake 259:from the 331:Category 243:suggest: 227:Ashworth 122:Reviewed 58:promoted 286:Nyttend 231:Nyttend 173:Nyttend 142:Nyttend 131:Comment 62:Panyd 16:< 306:talk 290:talk 278:talk 249:ALT1 235:talk 225:and 208:talk 188:talk 177:talk 161:talk 146:talk 60:by 43:or 333:: 300:-- 272:-- 251:: 124:: 73:( 39:, 304:( 288:( 276:( 270:? 233:( 206:( 186:( 175:( 159:( 144:( 114:? 88:) 51:.

Index

Template:Did you know nominations
this nomination's talk page
the article's talk page
Knowledge talk:Did you know
Panyd
Back to T:TDYK
Article history
Flooding at the site
Kappa V Archaeological Site
wave wash erosion
Sendai River
Nyttend
talk
Victuallers
talk
Nyttend
talk
Secretlondon
talk

Gerda Arendt
talk
Terminal Archaic
Epsilon II Archaeological Site
Hovey Lake
Ashworth
Nyttend
talk
Kappa V Archaeological Site
terminal archaic period

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.