510:
658:
533:
446:
323:
Nepal has been divided- the larger part was in the kingdom of Nepal which didn't has a representative assembly, while the smaller part was controlled (occupied) by the East India company which was nominally answerable to the United
Kingdom parliament- so in effect the parliamentary committee would be
332:
are you up for the challenge? GLAM:QSMM is a project to increase the quality of coverage of this industry in
Lancashire- but if you are willing to start writing some equivalent articles in India, I would glad to help you. Please feel free to put some changes into the article we can always do a good
580:
My apologies for the delay in responding. It looks like there are few unreferenced paragraphs. I highlighted the claims within those unreferenced paragraphs that were the most needing of citations. I also removed a self-referential line that was actually somewhat confusing. I moved it to the talk
631:
s. Rm'd url from Graham citation as requested- though I do think that a site that technically a blog but actually hosts material used in a
University of Lancaster sponsored project is slightly different from what is usually objected to in a blog. Anything, that I have missed? --
324:
responsible for both
Lancashire and Nepal. I suspect that this was not the point you were trying to make. When the Lancashire industry rationalised, the looms were moved to India but it would take someone with Hindi to be able to write authoratively on the
664:
with Alt2 getting my personal vote for most interesting. I appreciate the work that has gone into addressing all concerns. The article passes DYK criteria for date, length and referencing with no signs of close paraphrasing or plagiarism. It's good to go.
585:
that I'm (presuming) involves
Stanley Graham. As the site doesn't look to be reliable nor does it seem to be used as a source for anything I would recommend removing the link as it looks like it serves no real purpose.
544:
section that are completely unreferenced. Is there a plan to improve the referencing so this DYK nom can move forward? I hope so since I quite like Orlady's Alts and would like to see them on the Main Page.
99:
581:
page with a note. I'm starting to review the article for close paraphrasing concerns and noticed that the
Stanley Graham refs, while having the correct ISBN number for the offline text, links to
350:
Lucky coincidence. Nepal was just a random name that i had picked. What i wanted to point out is that the lead doesn't clarify which country's parliamentary committee had banned it.
375:
The article is pretty rough right now. It's a good topic, though. After the article is fixed up a bit, I think that there are some ALT hooks that will be plenty interesting:
454:
688:
94:
333:
faith revert if it is not appropriate- I would particular like help with references for shuttle catalogues with illustrations so I can do a SVG.--
36:
540:
that haven't yet been addressed. Some of the tags are undoubtedly valid and relevant to DYK since they highlight several paragraphs in the
367:
304:
264:
220:
614:
573:
499:
434:
286:
246:
17:
293:
The lead doesnt say anything about which one stopped it. Or is that also in disguise and you want people to see that in Google? §§
328:. There is need for many articles on the economics, architecture and organisation of cotton districts and notable mills.
669:
590:
549:
462:
44:
621:
I have changed the caption to reflect maker and date and rm'd the self reference. Not a big issue. I have zapped the
149:
353:
598:
Please note I'll be unable to edit
Knowledge for a week or two. I suggest you liaise with the article's author.
363:
300:
260:
216:
89:
40:
610:
569:
495:
430:
325:
282:
242:
200:
165:
458:
119:
525:
124:
640:
341:
192:
69:
450:
404:
399:
383:
357:
329:
294:
254:
210:
170:
601:
560:
486:
421:
273:
233:
196:
457:
hook which appeared on the front page yesterday, should this nomination now be rejected? --
270:
You need to click on the link in the hook to find out. Isn't that the point of a cryptic link?
29:
The following discussion is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below.
109:
672:
593:
552:
521:
412:
635:
513:
336:
188:
61:
509:
320:
682:
104:
388:
666:
625:
587:
546:
408:
657:
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as
532:
445:
253:
Yeah! But which government's parliament's parliamentary committee did it? §§
129:
537:
47:), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page.
582:
209:
So Nepal's
Parliamentary Committee has stopped shuttle kissing? §§
319:
What an interesting diversion, at the time in question under the
418:
Could you be a bit more specific about your concerns, please?
536:
It looks like almost two weeks ago an anon editor added
479:
474:
407:, long after it was outlawed in several U.S. states? --
154:
114:
387:" continued long after it was discovered to spread
8:
49:No further edits should be made to this page
77:
469:No. And please note that I deliberately
80:
352:And we already have an article called
7:
689:Passed DYK nominations from May 2013
473:include a link to this article in
24:
520:links. This is fine. —
477:, for that very reason. In fact,
18:Template:Did you know nominations
656:
531:
508:
444:
557:This now seems to be resolved.
32:Please do not modify this page.
1:
230:Parliamentary Committee did.
203:) at 23:12, 15 May 2013 (UTC)
381:: ... that the practice of "
528:) 12:37, 12 June 2013 (UTC)
465:) 10:33, 5 June 2013 (UTC)
267:} 10:27, 16 May 2013 (UTC)
223:} 04:47, 16 May 2013 (UTC)
45:Knowledge talk:Did you know
37:this nomination's talk page
705:
577:22:04, 25 June 2013 (UTC)
554:02:55, 22 June 2013 (UTC)
415:) 18:45, 20 May 2013 (UTC)
370:} 07:57, 17 May 2013 (UTC)
307:} 10:47, 16 May 2013 (UTC)
618:15:01, 1 July 2013 (UTC)
595:01:45, 1 July 2013 (UTC)
354:Textile industry in India
346:19:17, 16 May 2013 (UTC)
290:10:29, 16 May 2013 (UTC)
250:10:02, 16 May 2013 (UTC)
125:Find sources (notability)
100:Earwig's Copyvio Detector
674:17:30, 2 July 2013 (UTC)
645:17:59, 1 July 2013 (UTC)
538:several maintenance tags
503:10:49, 5 June 2013 (UTC)
438:19:36, 31 May 2013 (UTC)
74:00:13, 3 July 2013 (UTC)
475:the Bancroft nomination
449:As there was a link to
166:Parliamentary Committee
41:the article's talk page
583:a community forum site
483:, at the last minute.
326:Indian cotton industry
662:For Alt 1 & Alt 2
195:). Nominated by
115:A Simple Word Counter
95:Reviewer instructions
542:Traditional weaving
516:D1 only applies to
451:Kissing the shuttle
405:Lancashire, England
391:and other diseases?
384:kissing the shuttle
330:User:Dharmadhyaksha
141:Kissing the shuttle
120:Reviewers' template
459:Daemonic Kangaroo
204:
168:recommended that
138:
137:
696:
660:
644:
638:
630:
624:
617:
608:
604:
576:
567:
563:
535:
512:
502:
493:
489:
482:
448:
437:
428:
424:
360:
345:
339:
297:
289:
280:
276:
257:
249:
240:
236:
213:
186:
78:
72:
67:
64:
56:The result was:
34:
704:
703:
699:
698:
697:
695:
694:
693:
679:
678:
677:
634:
633:
628:
622:
606:
600:
599:
565:
559:
558:
491:
485:
484:
478:
466:
426:
420:
419:
400:shuttle kissing
358:
351:
335:
334:
295:
278:
272:
271:
255:
238:
232:
231:
211:
171:shuttle kissing
161:
159:
155:Article history
143:
134:
110:Character count
75:
70:
65:
62:
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
702:
700:
692:
691:
681:
680:
676:
675:
654:
653:
652:
651:
650:
649:
648:
647:
646:
529:
505:
504:
443:
442:
441:
440:
439:
416:
392:
372:
371:
359:Dharmadhyaksha
321:Sugauli Treaty
317:
316:
315:
314:
313:
312:
311:
310:
309:
308:
296:Dharmadhyaksha
256:Dharmadhyaksha
212:Dharmadhyaksha
184:
183:
182:
181:
176:
175:
158:
157:
152:
150:Back to T:TDYK
146:
144:
142:
139:
136:
135:
133:
132:
127:
122:
117:
112:
107:
102:
97:
92:
86:
83:
82:
54:
53:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
701:
690:
687:
686:
684:
673:
670:
668:
663:
659:
655:
642:
637:
627:
620:
619:
616:
612:
607:Pigsonthewing
603:
597:
596:
594:
591:
589:
584:
579:
578:
575:
571:
566:Pigsonthewing
562:
556:
555:
553:
550:
548:
543:
539:
534:
530:
527:
523:
519:
515:
511:
507:
506:
501:
497:
492:Pigsonthewing
488:
481:
476:
472:
468:
467:
464:
460:
456:
455:Bancroft Shed
452:
447:
436:
432:
427:Pigsonthewing
423:
417:
414:
410:
406:
403:continued in
402:
401:
396:
393:
390:
386:
385:
380:
377:
376:
374:
373:
369:
365:
361:
355:
349:
348:
347:
343:
338:
331:
327:
322:
306:
302:
298:
292:
291:
288:
284:
279:Pigsonthewing
275:
269:
268:
266:
262:
258:
252:
251:
248:
244:
239:Pigsonthewing
235:
229:
225:
224:
222:
218:
214:
208:
207:
206:
202:
198:
197:Pigsonthewing
194:
190:
180:
179:
178:
177:
173:
172:
167:
163:
162:
156:
153:
151:
148:
147:
140:
131:
128:
126:
123:
121:
118:
116:
113:
111:
108:
106:
103:
101:
98:
96:
93:
91:
88:
87:
85:
84:
79:
76:
73:
68:
59:
52:
50:
46:
42:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
661:
629:}}
623:{{
615:Andy's edits
611:Talk to Andy
602:Andy Mabbett
574:Andy's edits
570:Talk to Andy
561:Andy Mabbett
541:
517:
500:Andy's edits
496:Talk to Andy
487:Andy Mabbett
480:you added it
470:
435:Andy's edits
431:Talk to Andy
422:Andy Mabbett
398:
394:
389:tuberculosis
382:
378:
318:
287:Andy's edits
283:Talk to Andy
274:Andy Mabbett
247:Andy's edits
243:Talk to Andy
234:Andy Mabbett
227:
185:
174:should stop?
169:
57:
55:
48:
31:
28:
636:Clem Rutter
522:Crisco 1492
397:: ... that
337:Clem Rutter
187:Created by
164:... that a
130:Hook length
81:DYK toolbox
189:ClemRutter
105:QPQ check
90:DYK check
683:Category
58:promoted
453:on the
63:Pumpkin
518:bolded
471:didn't
409:Orlady
514:DYKSG
16:<
667:Agne
641:talk
588:Agne
547:Agne
526:talk
463:talk
413:talk
395:ALT2
379:ALT1
362:§§ {
356:. §§
342:talk
299:§§ {
259:§§ {
226:No,
215:§§ {
201:talk
193:talk
71:talk
609:);
568:);
494:);
429:);
281:);
241:);
66:Sky
60:by
43:or
685::
626:cn
613:;
572:;
498:;
433:;
285:;
245:;
205:.
145:(
39:,
671:/
643:)
639:(
605:(
592:/
564:(
551:/
524:(
490:(
461:(
425:(
411:(
368:C
366:/
364:T
344:)
340:(
305:C
303:/
301:T
277:(
265:C
263:/
261:T
237:(
228:a
221:C
219:/
217:T
199:(
191:(
160:)
51:.
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.