358:, but rather what the particular citation (now ref 19) is being used to support. The article claims that the video was released on July 18, and cites that reffed post there as proof. But the post says nothing about the release date of the video, it merely includes the video in a post dated July 18. The video could have been released the day before, several days before, that day, or some other circumstance: we don't know, and the short squib doesn't say. This is PFLai's point, and you need to address it directly. There were also concerns about PopCrush, which I've found to print rumors as fact on occasion, but as a description of a video that's included in the post, it may be overwritten (for example, "possessed"), but I think it's an okay source. The use of the word "acknowledged" in the article, however, is not: please use something neutral, like "wrote", or better yet, recast the sentence.
174:
462:
with the rest of the article. There is a bit of over-linking, but this should not be a show-stopper. About the hook, I must say I didn't know that the word "channel" can be used this way in formal
English. To me, it's a little slangy/chatty. If it's good enough for BlueMoonset and it's what the dictionary says, I am not going to (I cannot, really) stand in the way. I would give the green tick to the original hook with a minor revision:
94:
201:", which involves some communications with dead people, actually took place. (Frankly, not sure what websites would be.) I just watched the video on YouTube and would agree that the dance sequences reminded me of MJ's work, but I won't go so far as to say that there was "channeling". Does "channeling" refer to sth else? Hooks put on MainPage should be more factual. Is there another hook that we can use? --
197:
don't think it's a good idea to use for DYK. Furthermore, I am not sure if the websites Rap-Up.com or PopCrush.com are considered reliable sources. Particularly, I don't think Ref.#18 is solid enough as a source for the July 18th online premiere date. Also, while Ref.#19 indeed uses the word "channel", I have a hard time accepting that this blog-ish music site is appropriate to support a statement that "
500:
458:
193:
196:
Article expansion is long enough and recent enough. No neutrality or BLP concerns. Random googling of various sentences indicated no concerns related to copyright violations or plagiarism in the article. Refs in proper format. However, the suggested pic is not in the article and not from the video. I
283:
Thank you, Lil-unique No.1, for joining the discussion. While Rap-Up the publication itself is a reliable source, I am not sure if Ref.18 is used appropriately, at least as a reliable source in support for the release date. All dates on the webpage are, as far as I can see, date&time-stamps for
461:
Glad to have BlueMoonset helping to keep the process going. The new footnote using the Vevo page itself as ref for the release date is good. The footnote for the RapUp.com page is still there, but I have moved it up a bit to support the first half of the same sentence. For DYK purposes, I am happy
391:
Regarding the "channel" issue, I took it to have a different meaning, which I've confirmed at dictionary.com under the
Collins World Dictionary definitions: "to exhibit the traits of (another person) in one’s actions". That person frequently isn't dead: I've heard of actors channeling
405:
Sorry I reply a little bit late. I think I resolved the issues that were present in the first paragraph. You can check in the history. Btw, for "channeling" I added the word in quotes, cause actually that's what the reviewer from PopCrush wrote. Is it fine now? —
392:
characterizations, and not merely in parodies or impersonations/mimics. It can be attitude, movement, expression... but it's more like trying to be the person, almost emulation but from the inside out. (At least, that's the sense I've gotten from its usage.)
507:
is fine (although it shouldn't be necessary since the alterations to the original hook are so minor to make ALT2), and striking the earlier, unapproved hooks to avoid confusion. Thanks, everyone!
40:
36:
470:
263:
104:
228:
it shouild be considered good enough for DYK. It is an industry published magazine though now it is mainly website based and has a relatively large presence in industry.
547:
17:
307:
Just noticed that Tomica had never gotten a talk-page notification about these various issues. I'm inserting one now.
225:
44:
77:
284:
posted comments. And about ALT1, I must confess that I really don't understand what Ne-Yo was talking about. --
232:
often recieves exclusive information, has exclusive interviews and is invited to album release parties. —
93:
221:
512:
397:
363:
312:
248:
153:
329:
328:
cause the
Knowledge policy recognized it as a reliable source. I have used it the featured article "
173:
29:
The following discussion is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below.
508:
492:
416:
393:
359:
342:
308:
289:
233:
206:
185:
161:
149:
145:
479:
113:
541:
61:
131:
488:
407:
333:
285:
202:
181:
157:
141:
499:
457:
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as
198:
192:
47:), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page.
324:
217:
322:
Thanks for notifying me. I really don't see the problem with using
475:
268:
109:
220:.com is considered a reliable source ... if its good enough for
271:
said "if taken care of the right way, could help the world!"
332:" that I wrote, and nobody complaint about it on its FAC. —
82:
471:Let Me Love You (Until You Learn to Love Yourself)
264:Let Me Love You (Until You Learn to Love Yourself)
105:Let Me Love You (Until You Learn to Love Yourself)
69:Let Me Love You (Until You Learn to Love Yourself)
8:
49:No further edits should be made to this page
548:Passed DYK nominations from August 2012
261:- ... that when speaking of his song "
7:
468::... that in the music video for "
24:
495:) 00:22, 21 September 2012 (UTC)
400:) 18:12, 19 September 2012 (UTC)
102:... that in the music video for "
18:Template:Did you know nominations
515:) 03:11, 21 September 2012 (UTC)
498:
456:
366:) 18:12, 19 September 2012 (UTC)
315:) 17:28, 19 September 2012 (UTC)
191:
172:
164:) at 13:51, 10 August 2012 (UTC)
92:
503:Looks great. Reconfirming that
292:) 21:43, 9 September 2012 (UTC)
209:) 14:41, 2 September 2012 (UTC)
188:) 23:10, 1 September 2012 (UTC)
32:Please do not modify this page.
421:11:33, 20 September 2012 (UTC)
347:17:32, 19 September 2012 (UTC)
64:15:31, 21 September 2012 (UTC)
1:
252:13:44, 6 September 2012 (UTC)
216:Can I make an interjection?
45:Knowledge talk:Did you know
37:this nomination's talk page
564:
41:the article's talk page
140:Created/expanded by
354:The question is not
226:WP:Featured articles
487:Hope this helps. --
482:in his dance moves?
474:", American singer
119:in his dance moves?
108:", American singer
178: In progress
165:
156:). Nominated by
555:
502:
460:
419:
414:
413:
345:
340:
339:
246:
243:
239:
222:WP:Good articles
195:
176:
139:
96:
56:The result was:
34:
563:
562:
558:
557:
556:
554:
553:
552:
538:
537:
536:
480:Michael Jackson
417:
409:
408:
343:
335:
334:
241:
237:
234:
114:Michael Jackson
98:
89:
87:
83:Article history
71:
65:
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
561:
559:
551:
550:
540:
539:
535:
534:
533:
532:
531:
530:
529:
528:
527:
526:
525:
524:
523:
522:
521:
520:
519:
518:
517:
516:
485:
484:
483:
437:
436:
435:
434:
433:
432:
431:
430:
429:
428:
427:
426:
425:
424:
423:
422:
378:
377:
376:
375:
374:
373:
372:
371:
370:
369:
368:
367:
349:
348:
317:
316:
298:
297:
296:
295:
294:
293:
276:
275:
274:
273:
255:
254:
253:
211:
210:
189:
137:
136:
135:
134:
122:
121:
112:channels late
90:
86:
85:
80:
78:Back to T:TDYK
74:
72:
70:
67:
54:
53:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
560:
549:
546:
545:
543:
514:
510:
506:
501:
497:
496:
494:
490:
486:
481:
477:
473:
472:
467:
464:
463:
459:
455:
454:
453:
452:
451:
450:
449:
448:
447:
446:
445:
444:
443:
442:
441:
440:
439:
438:
420:
415:
412:
404:
403:
402:
401:
399:
395:
390:
389:
388:
387:
386:
385:
384:
383:
382:
381:
380:
379:
365:
361:
357:
353:
352:
351:
350:
346:
341:
338:
331:
327:
326:
321:
320:
319:
318:
314:
310:
306:
305:
304:
303:
302:
301:
300:
299:
291:
287:
282:
281:
280:
279:
278:
277:
272:
270:
266:
265:
260:
256:
251:
250:
247:
245:
231:
227:
223:
219:
215:
214:
213:
212:
208:
204:
200:
194:
190:
187:
183:
179:
175:
170:
169:
168:
167:
166:
163:
159:
155:
151:
147:
143:
133:
129:
126:
125:
124:
123:
120:
118:
115:
111:
107:
106:
100:
99:
97:
95:
84:
81:
79:
76:
75:
68:
66:
63:
59:
52:
50:
46:
42:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
504:
469:
465:
410:
355:
336:
323:
262:
258:
257:
249:
235:
229:
177:
138:
132:Regan Lamble
127:
116:
103:
101:
91:
57:
55:
48:
31:
28:
509:BlueMoonset
478:"channels"
394:BlueMoonset
360:BlueMoonset
309:BlueMoonset
150:Lil-unique1
199:channeling
117:(pictured)
542:Category
128:Reviewed
62:Bruce1ee
58:promoted
171:Review
489:PFHLai
418:(talk)
411:Tomica
356:Rap-Up
344:(talk)
337:Tomica
325:Rap-Up
286:PFHLai
240:niquℇ
230:Rap-Up
218:Rap-Up
203:PFHLai
182:PFHLai
180:... --
158:Tomica
142:Tomica
476:Ne-Yo
330:Rehab
269:Ne-Yo
259:ALT 1
110:Ne-Yo
16:<
513:talk
505:ALT2
493:talk
466:ALT2
398:talk
364:talk
313:talk
290:talk
236:Lil_
224:and
207:talk
186:talk
162:talk
154:talk
146:talk
60:by —
267:",
148:),
43:or
544::
130::
73:(
39:,
511:(
491:(
396:(
362:(
311:(
288:(
244:1
242:№
238:℧
205:(
184:(
160:(
152:(
144:(
88:)
51:.
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
