161:
454:
502:
297:
592:
519:
478:
578:, but that didn't exist until the 1980s and is certainly not a tourist attraction. The whole section was "sourced" to a book on a completely unrelated topic—a primer for schoolkids starting Film Studies 101—which as far as I can see doesn't mention the Thames, let alone the redevelopment of London Docklands, which was in any case an initiative of Margaret Thatcher in the 1980s.)
403:
260:
580:
Since I've only checked the small part with which I'm familiar (civil engineering on the Thames), I have to assume there's a reasonable possibility of a similar level of hoaxing going on in the rest of the article. (If anyone seriously believes punks wore "sta-press trousers, the
Crombie overcoat,
557:
and filled with heavy industries, whaling abbatoirs and steam-train marshalling yards, and walking through it would have been as far from "a pleasurable experience" as it's possible to be; that "the southern side of the river became a leisure spot" is an extremely dubious claim even today, and the
544:
which remains one of the busiest ports in Europe to this day; the docks were and are downstream of central London, so their closure would have had no significant impact on the environment within the city—what actually led to the clean-up of the Thames was the decline of heavy industry in the 1980s
570:(opened 1999), none of which have any significance to the year 1960; the Canary Islands are off the coast of western Africa and decidedly not in the Thames, and there's no island of any kind in the Thames within the then-current boundaries of London and other than a couple of tiny specks like
505:
Concerns about verifiability (for example, "After the London docks..." etc is not supported by the given ref) and neutrality ("made the rest of the world envy the booming culture of London with romance and love taking the front seat"?). Article also needs a thorough copy-editing.
595:—I seem to agree with everything in the post above. And even a few seconds' perusal throws up things on the surface that are easy to fix. The navbox at the top has removed hyphens from two article titles—why? MOSNUM says no apostrophe for decade abbreviations ('60s).
581:
and the pork-pie hat", something is seriously wrong somewhere.) This needs to be checked line-by-line before it gets anywhere near the main page, since major errors in a topic as widely covered as 1960s London are inexcusable. –
94:
553:
are nowhere near each other and neither had or have any particular cultural significance; Bermondsey (the area around Butler's Wharf) in the 1960s was the crime-ridden heartland of the
304:
was a fashionable shopping area is not referenced in the article and (2) that is became a "household name of youth fashion around the world" is not in the article.
633:
160:
89:
251:
574:
in the extreme west there are still no islands in even the post-1965 expanded boundaries—the only place with a remotely similar name on the Thames is
36:
17:
229:
44:
144:
329:
References have been fixed. The words "household" and "world" have been deleted in the lead and the following
84:
40:
563:
225:
114:
466:
237:
205:
119:
558:
only three things on the south side of the river which could conceivably be described as such are the
485:
hook is appropriately referenced. I have struck out the original hook and removed the unwanted image.
511:
490:
415:
272:
617:
554:
369:
289:
221:
171:
384:
364:
309:
65:
406:
ref is needed after "thrived as a place of pop culture and boutique culture came into vogue..."
29:
The following discussion is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below.
550:
437:
335:
213:
104:
424:
The last sentence in the last paragraph of the "Swinging London" section is also unsourced.--
559:
462:
426:
233:
201:
603:
582:
546:
523:
507:
486:
407:
264:
176:
613:
571:
541:
453:
301:
285:
217:
180:
627:
380:
305:
99:
61:
501:
296:
575:
537:
209:
591:
518:
435:
References fixed as per above observations. Yes, original picture would be fine.--
477:
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as
596:
567:
402:
259:
124:
540:
closed in 1969 not 1960, and in any event were only a tiny part of the
461:
hook and recent changes in the article, notably the source citations.
47:), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page.
562:(opened 1951, expanded 1967), the cluster of tourist traps around
175:
was a centre for the worldwide youth culture, exemplified by the "
70:
Withdrawn from consideration by one of the article creators
612:
I am withdrawing this nom from further consideration. --
527:
379:
Can't we have the original picture? It is much better.
149:
109:
263:The entire ref on Carnaby Street is missing a ref.
186:
a household name of youth fashion around the world?
545:and a consequent decrease in industrial effluent;
376:thrived as a place of pop and boutique cultures?
284:I fixed the spacing; it should be fine now. --
8:
49:No further edits should be made to this page
481:Article now meets the DYK criteria and the
252:Template:Did you know nominations/Iris hut
72:
75:
522:I noticed this pop up as it linked to
634:Failed DYK nominations from June 2013
7:
24:
18:Template:Did you know nominations
590:
517:
500:
476:
452:
430: 00:22, 4 July 2013 (UTC)
401:
295:
258:
159:
457:Review needed to check the the
32:Please do not modify this page.
240:) at 15:33, 14 June 2013 (UTC)
1:
620:) 03:27, 18 July 2013 (UTC)
528:had to cut an entire section
292:) 02:07, 16 June 2013 (UTC)
532:literally not a single word
514:) 03:58, 16 July 2013 (UTC)
493:) 20:03, 13 July 2013 (UTC)
312:) 21:33, 29 June 2013 (UTC)
68:) 01:18, 20 July 2013 (UTC)
45:Knowledge talk:Did you know
37:this nomination's talk page
650:
469:) 17:34, 8 July 2013 (UTC)
443:. 15:10, 5 July 2013 (UTC)
387:) 22:19, 1 July 2013 (UTC)
341:. 16:39, 1 July 2013 (UTC)
300:Hook is no good. (1) that
608:01:59, 18 July 2013 (UTC)
587:15:43, 17 July 2013 (UTC)
420:23:20, 1 July 2013 (UTC)
374:(Carnaby Street pictured)
277:01:35, 16 June 2013 (UTC)
120:Find sources (notability)
95:Earwig's Copyvio Detector
179:" subculture which made
41:the article's talk page
566:(opened 1997) and the
232:). Nominated by
110:A Simple Word Counter
90:Reviewer instructions
333:Hook is suggested.--
564:Shakespeare's Globe
370:London in the 1960s
172:London in the 1960s
136:London in the 1960s
115:Reviewers' template
184:(pictured in 1969)
579:
241:
226:Bonkers The Clown
133:
132:
641:
606:
601:
594:
585:
560:Southbank Centre
535:
521:
504:
480:
456:
440:
418:
413:
410:
405:
338:
299:
275:
270:
267:
262:
199:
163:
73:
56:The result was:
34:
649:
648:
644:
643:
642:
640:
639:
638:
624:
623:
622:
604:
597:
583:
547:Vauxhall Bridge
524:Vauxhall Bridge
438:
416:
411:
408:
336:
273:
268:
265:
177:Swinging London
165:
156:
154:
150:Article history
138:
129:
105:Character count
69:
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
647:
645:
637:
636:
626:
625:
610:
609:
588:
572:Eel Pie Island
555:National Front
551:Butler's Wharf
542:Port of London
515:
497:
496:
495:
494:
471:
470:
449:
448:
447:
446:
445:
444:
399:
398:
397:
396:
395:
394:
393:
392:
391:
390:
389:
388:
349:
348:
347:
346:
345:
344:
343:
342:
320:
319:
318:
317:
316:
315:
314:
313:
302:Carnaby Street
279:
278:
255:
254:
197:
196:
195:
194:
189:
188:
181:Carnaby Street
157:
153:
152:
147:
145:Back to T:TDYK
141:
139:
137:
134:
131:
130:
128:
127:
122:
117:
112:
107:
102:
97:
92:
87:
81:
78:
77:
54:
53:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
646:
635:
632:
631:
629:
621:
619:
615:
607:
602:
600:
593:
589:
586:
577:
573:
569:
565:
561:
556:
552:
548:
543:
539:
533:
529:
525:
520:
516:
513:
509:
503:
499:
498:
492:
488:
484:
479:
475:
474:
473:
472:
468:
464:
460:
455:
451:
450:
442:
441:
434:
433:
432:
431:
429:
428:
423:
422:
421:
419:
414:
404:
386:
382:
378:
377:
375:
372:
371:
366:
363:... that the
362:
359:
358:
357:
356:
355:
354:
353:
352:
351:
350:
340:
339:
332:
328:
327:
326:
325:
324:
323:
322:
321:
311:
307:
303:
298:
294:
293:
291:
287:
283:
282:
281:
280:
276:
271:
261:
257:
256:
253:
250:
247:
246:
245:
244:
243:
239:
235:
231:
227:
223:
219:
215:
211:
207:
203:
193:
192:
191:
190:
187:
185:
182:
178:
174:
173:
167:
166:
164:
162:
151:
148:
146:
143:
142:
135:
126:
123:
121:
118:
116:
113:
111:
108:
106:
103:
101:
98:
96:
93:
91:
88:
86:
83:
82:
80:
79:
74:
71:
67:
63:
59:
52:
50:
46:
42:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
611:
598:
576:Canary Wharf
538:London Docks
531:
482:
458:
436:
425:
400:
373:
368:
360:
334:
330:
248:
198:
183:
170:
168:
158:
57:
55:
48:
31:
28:
530:, in which
526:, and have
463:BlueMoonset
427:Jetstreamer
234:Dr. Blofeld
202:Dr. Blofeld
200:Created by
125:Hook length
76:DYK toolbox
584:iridescent
568:London Eye
534:was true.
508:Nikkimaria
487:Cwmhiraeth
614:Rosiestep
286:Rosiestep
218:Rosiestep
169:... that
100:QPQ check
85:DYK check
628:Category
381:Hawkeye7
365:West End
306:Hawkeye7
249:Reviewed
62:Hawkeye7
58:rejected
605:(talk)
439:Nvvchar
409:Pumpkin
337:Nvvchar
266:Pumpkin
224:), and
210:Nvvchar
536:(The
16:<
618:talk
599:Tony
549:and
512:talk
491:talk
483:ALT1
467:talk
459:ALT1
417:talk
385:talk
361:ALT1
331:ALT1
310:talk
290:talk
274:talk
238:talk
230:talk
222:talk
214:talk
206:talk
66:talk
412:Sky
367:of
269:Sky
216:),
208:),
60:by
43:or
630::
242:.
140:(
39:,
616:(
510:(
489:(
465:(
383:(
308:(
288:(
236:(
228:(
220:(
212:(
204:(
155:)
64:(
51:.
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
