411:
is obviously some sort of a longterm cooperation between the two editors (that could be verified by a cursory look at all
Tigerboy1966's articles in DYK). Granted, that cooperation could've developed right here in DYK, but it still gives the impression that it's somehow skirting a DYK regulation that was enacted in good faith to help the project cope with the backlog. A few courtesy reviews to help out the rest of the editors here (especially at a time like this when the backlog is really huge) would be looked at very kindly, I think. Just a thought. Cheers!
299:
493:
383:
372:
350:
339:
404:
361:
328:
317:
431:
occasion, however, I do admit to some co-operation. I had created a number of similar articles and when I noticed that PFHLai had nominated one of them I suggested that a group nomination might be viable. I'm quite happy to review some nominations as a good will gesture, in fact I did a couple at the
410:
However, on a separate note: I do think that
Tigerboy1966 (and to a lesser degree, perhaps, PFHLai) should be reviewing more hooks for DYK. While, technically, they are not bound by the QPQ requirement (because the articles are not nominated by their creator (Tigerboy1966) but rather by PFHLai) there
273:
Given the recent flood of racehorse hooks, I think doing so would be most unfortunate, as it would add another six all at once. With luck, someone will come. Perhaps you could try to recruit one of the people who have reviewed other recent ones?
426:
Fixed. I do appreciate the point. As I've said before, I just write articles and have no control or any real interest in whether or not they get nominated for DYK. The first thing I usually know about it is when they appear on the main page. On
334:: Article verified for length, date and sources. The first fact of the hook is verified, but the second fact (never one another title) needs a reference. Preferably after the sentence that starts "On her final appearance..."
367:: Article verified for length, date and sources. Hook is also verified, but both facts of the hook need an inline citation after the respective sentences (where it says she won the oaks) and (where it says she was retired).
323:: Article verified for length, date and sources. Hook is verified, but needs an inline citation after the sentence that says she won the Oaks, "... to win by one and a quarter lengths from Dance A Dream."
524:
407:
Overall: only minor issues with placing the inline citation after the hook facts in some articles. Once that is dealt with, this should be good to go.
36:
17:
389:: Article verified for length, date and sources. Hook is also verified and has an inline citation. This one is good to go as well.
378:: Article verified for length, date and sources. Hook is also verified and has an inline citation. This one is good to go as well.
356:: Article verified for length, date and sources. Hook is also verified and has an inline citation. This one is good to go as well.
432:
weekend, and will do a couple more before getting back to creating content. Anyone know if they have horse racing on
Gibraltar?
345:: Article verified for length, date and sources. Hook is also verified and has an inline citation. This one is good to go.
496:
Checked. All articles are good to go for the modified hook. And thanks for both the excellent articles and the reviews!
44:
76:
166:
40:
279:
235:
457:
On a separate note, I think that it might be better to state that none of the fillies ever won another
285:
Flood? Compared to hooks about athletes, pop songs and TV shows, this is just a small puddle. --
298:
29:
The following discussion is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below.
501:
462:
433:
416:
386:
320:
309:
230:
194:
162:
128:
481:
290:
275:
267:
246:
174:
151:
353:
212:
518:
497:
412:
305:
262:
Perhaps I have to break this up into 7 hooks. Maybe easier to attract reviewers? --
477:
375:
342:
286:
263:
242:
224:
206:
170:
147:
62:
492:
382:
371:
349:
338:
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as
403:
360:
327:
316:
238:
133:
331:
200:
364:
218:
136:
as a 33/1 long shot, and failed to win another race before she retired?
47:), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page.
115:
110:
105:
100:
95:
90:
85:
8:
49:No further edits should be made to this page
296:I'll take the bullet on this one :)
234:ever won another race after winning the
525:Passed DYK nominations from August 2012
476:Hook tweaked as suggested. Thanks. --
66: 16:27, 27 September 2012 (UTC)
7:
24:
312:) 10:20, 26 September 2012 (UTC)
293:) 02:44, 23 September 2012 (UTC)
282:) 20:11, 22 September 2012 (UTC)
270:) 00:27, 21 September 2012 (UTC)
18:Template:Did you know nominations
504:) 03:07, 27 September 2012 (UTC)
491:
484:) 22:53, 26 September 2012 (UTC)
419:) 11:06, 26 September 2012 (UTC)
402:
381:
370:
359:
348:
337:
326:
315:
297:
177:) at 15:10, 19 August 2012 (UTC)
192:: ... that none of the fillies
32:Please do not modify this page.
469:18:21, 26 September 2012 (UTC)
440:18:18, 26 September 2012 (UTC)
1:
154:) 15:10, 19 August 2012 (UTC)
253:02:07, 26 August 2012 (UTC)
251:21:27, 19 August 2012 (UTC)
45:Knowledge talk:Did you know
37:this nomination's talk page
541:
81:( Article history links:
465: Tigerboy1966
436: Tigerboy1966
41:the article's talk page
161:Created/expanded by
236:British Classic Race
146:: Not a self-nom. --
126:... that the filly
387:Look Here (horse)
321:Moonshell (horse)
303: In progress
178:
169:). Nominated by
116:Look Here (horse)
86:Moonshell (horse)
71:Look Here (horse)
532:
495:
467:
438:
406:
385:
374:
363:
352:
341:
330:
319:
301:
160:
56:The result was:
34:
540:
539:
535:
534:
533:
531:
530:
529:
515:
514:
513:
463:
434:
393:Review finished
354:Imagine (horse)
186:Six-in-One hook
123:
122:
120:
101:Imagine (horse)
73:
67:
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
538:
536:
528:
527:
517:
516:
512:
511:
510:
509:
508:
507:
506:
505:
486:
485:
471:
470:
454:
453:
452:
451:
450:
449:
448:
447:
446:
445:
444:
443:
442:
441:
421:
420:
408:
397:
396:
390:
379:
368:
357:
346:
335:
324:
257:
256:
255:
254:
158:
157:
156:
155:
138:
137:
119:
118:
113:
108:
103:
98:
93:
88:
82:
80:
77:Back to T:TDYK
74:
72:
69:
54:
53:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
537:
526:
523:
522:
520:
503:
499:
494:
490:
489:
488:
487:
483:
479:
475:
474:
473:
472:
468:
466:
460:
456:
455:
439:
437:
430:
425:
424:
423:
422:
418:
414:
409:
405:
401:
400:
399:
398:
394:
391:
388:
384:
380:
377:
373:
369:
366:
362:
358:
355:
351:
347:
344:
340:
336:
333:
329:
325:
322:
318:
314:
313:
311:
307:
304:
300:
295:
294:
292:
288:
284:
283:
281:
277:
272:
271:
269:
265:
261:
260:
259:
258:
252:
248:
244:
240:
237:
233:
232:
227:
226:
221:
220:
215:
214:
209:
208:
203:
202:
197:
196:
191:
188:
187:
183:
182:
181:
180:
179:
176:
172:
168:
164:
153:
149:
145:
142:
141:
140:
139:
135:
132:won the 2008
131:
130:
125:
124:
117:
114:
112:
109:
107:
104:
102:
99:
97:
94:
92:
89:
87:
84:
83:
78:
70:
68:
65:
64:
59:
52:
50:
46:
42:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
464:
458:
435:
428:
392:
302:
250:
229:
223:
217:
211:
205:
199:
193:
189:
185:
184:
163:Tigerboy1966
159:
143:
127:
61:
57:
55:
48:
31:
28:
376:Light Shift
343:Love Divine
276:BlueMoonset
225:Light Shift
207:Love Divine
190:7-in-1 hook
111:Light Shift
96:Love Divine
239:Epsom Oaks
134:Epsom Oaks
332:Shahtoush
231:Look Here
201:Shahtoush
195:Moonshell
129:Look Here
91:Shahtoush
519:Category
58:promoted
365:Eswarah
219:Eswarah
213:Imagine
144:Comment
106:Eswarah
478:PFHLai
287:PFHLai
264:PFHLai
243:PFHLai
171:PFHLai
148:PFHLai
63:Allen3
498:Yazan
413:Yazan
306:Yazan
16:<
502:talk
482:talk
459:race
429:this
417:talk
310:talk
291:talk
280:talk
268:talk
247:talk
241:? --
228:and
175:talk
167:talk
152:talk
60:by
43:or
521::
249:)
222:,
216:,
210:,
204:,
198:,
75:(
39:,
500:(
480:(
461:.
415:(
395:.
308:(
289:(
278:(
266:(
245:(
173:(
165:(
150:(
121:)
79:)
51:.
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.