128:
807:
592:
567:
486:
339:
249:
506:
753:
685:
417:
365:
269:
226:
514:
second problem is that huge chunks of the article lack inline refs, and that's a core requirement that we couldn't possibly ignore. I count 19 paragraphs without refs. The rule of thumb is that you need at least one ref per paragraph. I haven't adjusted the hook (i.e. removed the bolding) or removed the credit as yet in case somebody disagrees with my view.
202:: I have added Loring Air Force Base as I plan on expanding it more once I get the chance in the immediate future. I still have a lot of material to add, but I wanted to get the other articles up there just in case the five days expired before I could finish it. Since there is a huge backlog, I was advised to do this on the talk page.
646:
There's still only one source that truly supports the usage "alert crew", but the situation is now acceptable. However, I note that the article is exclusively about U.S. military usage. Is this term used globally (in which case the article should be globlized), or should the article be revised to say
513:
article is a nice piece of work, but it fails DYK requirements on two fronts. First, the 5x expansion took you 10 days (7 to 17 Aug), and these things should be done within 5 days. Ok, we could bend the rules and say that since it's such a substantial article (41 kB of prose), let's IAR this. But the
599:
contains the term "alert crew". Moreover, I noted that two of the three cited sources appear to be military fansites. Without additional sourcing for the terminology, the verifiability of the article is in question. In a brief Google search, I didn't find much. I did find one possibly useful item: a
306:
about this. The reason it stalls the nomination, is because if a merge happens, it changes the text of the article. And a review has to be done after the merge happens. If it's a proposed merge, and nothing has been decided, it kind of hangs it in limbo. I would encourage you to post over on the
619:
Wow, that's funny because in 2008, the F-15's had been gone from Otis for about a year, and there would be no need to even think of constructing them. Honestly, I have no idea what they are talking about, as they also tore down the alert hangers the next year. Otis did have an alert building
36:
787:
I just added an image to the hook, and changed "fifteen" to "15." It still comes out to 202 characters, so if you want, I'll try to slim it further. I figure if we have spent all this time creating a good hook, I might as well add an image to make it look pretty.
40:
756:
I have reviewed all these articles. Their creation or five-fold expansion all took place in early August within the DYK time frame. They are all long enough. My only concern is with the hook. The 15 minute deadline is mentioned in the
727:
Better still, you could add that fact to the body of the article and move the reference there, as the lead is to summarise the article. But either way, this particular article is good to go.
127:
528:
Almost finished. Essentially, I need to find citations on some stuff that was there before I even heard of the page, so that might take a tad longer than the rest of it.
832:
194:
420:
Elephant walk (aviation) article was created
February 2012 as a stub, currently has only 1,534 characters of readable prose, and is not currently 5X expansion.
71:
Loring Air Force Base, Alert crew, Mole hole, Christmas tree (aviation), Loring Air Force Base Alert Area, Elephant walk (aviation), Minimum
Interval Takeoff
469:
Of note, I just finished the massive expansion of the Loring article, and the merge discussion was closed, so I think this should be good to go!
692:. Apart from a missing citation, it should be good to go (just long enough, new, no problems with copyvios, otherwise suitably referenced).
662:
It should probably be globalized, as the image I included includes a
Canadian unit, and I am sure other nations use this term as well.
17:
164:
322:
Oh shoot, I read that wrong. And to your advice of posting it there, I will. I went out to dinner earlier, so I'll do it now.
810:
Hook fact now cited, new hook approved and image is in the public domain. Hook is not too long for a multiple article hook.
620:
constructed for it, but that was torn down about ten years ago. As for the links, I'll correct them in the coming days.
303:
44:
76:
302:
I didn't say it was proposed for merge into others. I said "with". As I said before, you might want to post on
158:
758:
595:
I took a look at one of the other articles in this hook. I found that none of the sources cited in the article
176:
170:
510:
494:
230:
137:
539:
I just need to cite the section where it talks about the based aircraft, and it should be good go to.
815:
766:
734:
699:
577:
153:
776:
I just cited it, so it should be good to go. Thank you so much for finishing the review process.
29:
The following discussion is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below.
601:
455:
425:
403:
377:
347:
312:
281:
257:
241:
793:
781:
713:
667:
652:
636:
625:
609:
604:
that is designing and possibly also building "alert crew quarters" for the U.S. military. --
555:
544:
533:
522:
490:
474:
440:
435:
It's 5X from what it was when I decided to expand it, and this is including readable prose.
388:
383:
It's 5X from what it was when I decided to expand it, and this is including readable prose.
327:
292:
214:
811:
762:
307:
WP Talk DYK page to get feedback. I feel for you, but a proposed merge creates a stall.
729:
694:
572:
806:
566:
485:
338:
248:
826:
591:
451:
421:
399:
373:
343:
308:
277:
253:
237:
505:
450:
Yeah, you're right. It's 5X. You might want to remove the stub classification.
272:
Loring Air Force Base article is proposed for merge with multiple other articles.
789:
777:
709:
663:
648:
632:
621:
605:
551:
540:
529:
518:
470:
436:
384:
323:
288:
210:
62:
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as
752:
684:
596:
416:
364:
268:
225:
142:
689:
342:
Merge proposal closed. No articles will be merged with Loring Air Force Base
287:
Other articles are proposed to be merged into it, not the other way around.
148:
368:
MITO article was created
February 2012 and is not currently 5X expansion.
708:
I just added a citation to that fact, so thanks for pointing that out!
631:
Okay, I added some better (and more official) sources to the article.
47:), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page.
229:
Loring Air Force Base Alert Area article is proposed for merger with
489:
Needs a full review, which includes the hook and all six articles.
252:
Merge proposal closed. This will remain a stand-alone article.
115:
110:
105:
100:
95:
90:
85:
550:Done. Feel free to look over the article now.
8:
398:You're right about this one, too. It's 5X.
49:No further edits should be made to this page
647:that it's a U.S.-specific military term? --
217:). Self nom at 15:59, 9 August 2012 (UTC)
570:The other articles still need reviewing.
833:Passed DYK nominations from August 2012
7:
761:article but has no inline citation.
66: 11:04, 10 November 2012 (UTC)
24:
18:Template:Did you know nominations
805:
751:
683:
590:
565:
504:
484:
415:
363:
337:
267:
247:
224:
126:
106:Loring Air Force Base Alert Area
818:) 09:36, 10 November 2012 (UTC)
796:) 08:09, 10 November 2012 (UTC)
784:) 08:01, 10 November 2012 (UTC)
769:) 07:07, 10 November 2012 (UTC)
32:Please do not modify this page.
716:) 21:55, 21 October 2012 (UTC)
670:) 01:30, 15 October 2012 (UTC)
655:) 15:39, 13 October 2012 (UTC)
639:) 04:03, 12 October 2012 (UTC)
602:page by a construction company
558:) 04:03, 12 October 2012 (UTC)
547:) 15:03, 8 October 2012 (UTC)
380:) 13:52, 21 August 2012 (UTC)
284:) 13:46, 21 August 2012 (UTC)
244:) 13:44, 21 August 2012 (UTC)
1:
705:09:32, 21 October 2012 (UTC)
628:) 15:03, 8 October 2012 (UTC)
612:) 14:39, 8 October 2012 (UTC)
536:) 03:39, 8 October 2012 (UTC)
525:) 00:42, 7 October 2012 (UTC)
497:) 02:58, 29 August 2012 (UTC)
477:) 00:55, 25 August 2012 (UTC)
458:) 21:39, 22 August 2012 (UTC)
443:) 21:14, 22 August 2012 (UTC)
428:) 18:50, 21 August 2012 (UTC)
406:) 21:39, 22 August 2012 (UTC)
391:) 21:14, 22 August 2012 (UTC)
350:) 00:55, 25 August 2012 (UTC)
330:) 03:20, 23 August 2012 (UTC)
315:) 21:39, 22 August 2012 (UTC)
295:) 21:14, 22 August 2012 (UTC)
260:) 00:55, 25 August 2012 (UTC)
740:02:34, 22 October 2012 (UTC)
583:17:52, 5 October 2012 (UTC)
304:Knowledge talk:Did you know
45:Knowledge talk:Did you know
37:this nomination's talk page
849:
101:Christmas tree (aviation)
81:( Article history links:
759:Minimum Interval Takeoff
183:, all within 15 minutes?
116:Minimum Interval Takeoff
111:Elephant walk (aviation)
41:the article's talk page
146:would scramble from a
511:Loring Air Force Base
231:Loring Air Force Base
209:Created/expanded by
86:Loring Air Force Base
218:
840:
809:
790:Kevin Rutherford
778:Kevin Rutherford
755:
737:
732:
710:Kevin Rutherford
702:
697:
688:I have reviewed
687:
664:Kevin Rutherford
633:Kevin Rutherford
622:Kevin Rutherford
594:
580:
575:
569:
552:Kevin Rutherford
541:Kevin Rutherford
530:Kevin Rutherford
519:Kevin Rutherford
508:
488:
471:Kevin Rutherford
437:Kevin Rutherford
419:
385:Kevin Rutherford
367:
341:
324:Kevin Rutherford
289:Kevin Rutherford
271:
251:
228:
208:
130:
56:The result was:
34:
848:
847:
843:
842:
841:
839:
838:
837:
823:
822:
821:
735:
730:
700:
695:
578:
573:
132:
123:
122:
120:
73:
67:
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
846:
844:
836:
835:
825:
824:
820:
819:
802:
801:
800:
799:
798:
797:
785:
771:
770:
746:
745:
744:
743:
742:
741:
720:
719:
718:
717:
680:
679:
678:
677:
676:
675:
674:
673:
672:
671:
657:
656:
641:
640:
629:
614:
613:
585:
584:
563:
562:
561:
560:
559:
537:
526:
501:
500:
499:
498:
479:
478:
466:
465:
464:
463:
462:
461:
460:
459:
445:
444:
430:
429:
412:
411:
410:
409:
408:
407:
393:
392:
370:
369:
360:
359:
358:
357:
356:
355:
354:
353:
352:
351:
332:
331:
317:
316:
297:
296:
274:
273:
264:
263:
262:
261:
234:
233:
206:
205:
204:
203:
197:
195:Nuclear Strike
185:
184:
168:), perform an
165:the alert area
159:christmas tree
124:
119:
118:
113:
108:
103:
98:
93:
88:
82:
80:
77:Back to T:TDYK
74:
72:
69:
54:
53:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
845:
834:
831:
830:
828:
817:
813:
808:
804:
803:
795:
791:
786:
783:
779:
775:
774:
773:
772:
768:
764:
760:
754:
750:
749:
748:
747:
739:
738:
733:
726:
725:
724:
723:
722:
721:
715:
711:
707:
706:
704:
703:
698:
691:
686:
682:
681:
669:
665:
661:
660:
659:
658:
654:
650:
645:
644:
643:
642:
638:
634:
630:
627:
623:
618:
617:
616:
615:
611:
607:
603:
598:
593:
589:
588:
587:
586:
582:
581:
576:
568:
564:
557:
553:
549:
548:
546:
542:
538:
535:
531:
527:
524:
520:
516:
515:
512:
507:
503:
502:
496:
492:
487:
483:
482:
481:
480:
476:
472:
468:
467:
457:
453:
449:
448:
447:
446:
442:
438:
434:
433:
432:
431:
427:
423:
418:
414:
413:
405:
401:
397:
396:
395:
394:
390:
386:
382:
381:
379:
375:
372:
371:
366:
362:
361:
349:
345:
340:
336:
335:
334:
333:
329:
325:
321:
320:
319:
318:
314:
310:
305:
301:
300:
299:
298:
294:
290:
286:
285:
283:
279:
276:
275:
270:
266:
265:
259:
255:
250:
246:
245:
243:
239:
236:
235:
232:
227:
223:
222:
221:
220:
219:
216:
212:
201:
198:
196:
192:
189:
188:
187:
186:
182:
179:
178:
173:
172:
171:elephant walk
167:
166:
162:(both within
161:
160:
155:
154:awaiting jets
151:
150:
145:
144:
140:
139:
134:
133:
131:
129:
117:
114:
112:
109:
107:
104:
102:
99:
97:
94:
92:
89:
87:
84:
83:
78:
70:
68:
65:
64:
59:
52:
50:
46:
42:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
728:
693:
571:
207:
199:
190:
180:
175:
169:
163:
157:
147:
141:
136:
125:
61:
57:
55:
48:
31:
28:
517:I'm on it.
491:BlueMoonset
143:alert crews
812:Cwmhiraeth
763:Cwmhiraeth
597:alert crew
181:(pictured)
138:Loring AFB
91:Alert crew
690:Mole hole
152:, run to
149:mole hole
135:... that
96:Mole hole
827:Category
191:Reviewed
58:promoted
731:Schwede
696:Schwede
574:Schwede
452:Maile66
422:Maile66
400:Maile66
374:Maile66
344:Maile66
309:Maile66
278:Maile66
254:Maile66
238:Maile66
200:Comment
649:Orlady
606:Orlady
211:Ktr101
174:and a
63:Allen3
156:on a
16:<
816:talk
794:talk
782:talk
767:talk
714:talk
668:talk
653:talk
637:talk
626:talk
610:talk
556:talk
545:talk
534:talk
523:talk
509:The
495:talk
475:talk
456:talk
441:talk
426:talk
404:talk
389:talk
378:talk
348:talk
328:talk
313:talk
293:talk
282:talk
258:talk
242:talk
215:talk
177:MITO
60:by
43:or
829::
736:66
701:66
579:66
193::
75:(
39:,
814:(
792:(
780:(
765:(
712:(
666:(
651:(
635:(
624:(
608:(
554:(
543:(
532:(
521:(
493:(
473:(
454:(
439:(
424:(
402:(
387:(
376:(
346:(
326:(
311:(
291:(
280:(
256:(
240:(
213:(
121:)
79:)
51:.
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
