138:
351:
I've substituted that "pioneering" for "top". The hook facts are sourced in the article. DYKcheck says the article, which was only a day old at the time of nomination, has 2676 prose characters, far over the minimum 1500. Close paraphrasing check made against several sources; a few phrases adjusted accordingly. Article and hook appear to be neutral and not unduly negative; hook is interesting. QPQ completed.
347:
239:
overreacted. The number of "citation needed" tags was a bit worrying. I eliminated one by deleting the "Karamveer
Puraskar" mention, since I couldn't find her listed on the award's website; in any event, by DYK rules that one has to be cited. One of the sources the article had supplied other information. You may want to drop her earlier schooling if you can't find a reliable source for it.
301:
238:
It appears that no further edits will be made by
Ayanosh. At this point, it's up to you whether to pass this or not. I have to admit that I'm not so worried about the "negative information" part of the hook, since when examined it doesn't appear to be so negative, but rather that the Delhi High Court
350:
Both hooks have been approved. The "three sources" that were supposed to support Trehan's "reputation as a top investigative journalist" unfortunately do not; two have been removed entirely for not mentioning it at all, really; as the remaining one calls her a "pioneer" in investigative jounalism,
326:
As the page creator is no longer working on this article, I took the liberty of editing the page. However, I don't agree with your comments. It is not POV to say that Trehan's work "earned her a reputation as a top investigative journalist", especially when this statement is sourced to 3 different
333:
is a leading paper; it is. I did replace "Trehan published her best-selling book" with "Trehan published her first book". It would be nice to say how long the book was on the non-fiction best-seller list, where it debuted at #1, but I am unable to find a source.
191:
I went ahead and formatted the references, looked up all your sources, added more information, removed primary sources like publisher's and agents' blurbs, and did a thorough copyedit. I noted in the text where citations or dates are still needed.
159:
say.So while it certainly is not the best article but it can still be said that it has enough for DYK.On a different note i would have worked on it more, had i more time but i don't.So please have a re-look.--
304:
I think there is some problems with NPOV. Statements like "which ensured ... investigative journalist" and "leading news ... newspapers" doesn't seems to be neutral to me. My another doubt is that how can
141:
The article reads like a series of facts. It needs copyediting to bring it up to
Knowledge standards both in format and substance. The references are all bald URLs. The image is not showing on the page.
173:
375:
127:
36:
254:
OK, I removed the schooling line and expanded the description of her book so this doesn't look like a stub. Here is an alt suggestion:
17:
317:
44:
203:
Regarding the hook, I don't think it's appropriate to highlight negative information about a living individual (cf.
81:
204:
156:
356:
244:
65:
310:
315:
29:
The following discussion is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below.
339:
279:
212:
197:
181:
164:
147:
116:
40:
352:
271:
240:
103:
61:
329:
369:
137:
335:
275:
266:
208:
193:
177:
160:
143:
112:
98:
346:
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as
300:
102:, an Indian journalist, had to apologise for publishing an article rating
207:). She has enough positive accomplishments that could be highlighted.
47:), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page.
155:
I take all your comments, but the article doesn't lack anything the
261:
309:
be her best-selling book, when she has written only one book.
86:
274:for publishing an article rating their judges?
128:Template:Did you know nominations/Annie Martin
8:
172:Do you want me to do your work for you? Per
49:No further edits should be made to this page
270:and her colleagues had to apologise to the
119:). Self nom at 05:24, 31 July 2012 (UTC)
327:references. It is not POV to say that
376:Passed DYK nominations from July 2012
7:
176:, at least format the references.
24:
18:Template:Did you know nominations
345:
299:
136:
68:) 02:23, 1 September 2012 (UTC)
32:Please do not modify this page.
167:) 14:11, 20 August 2012 (UTC)
1:
359:) 21:34, 30 August 2012 (UTC)
342:) 20:16, 30 August 2012 (UTC)
282:) 07:02, 30 August 2012 (UTC)
247:) 05:35, 30 August 2012 (UTC)
215:) 20:57, 21 August 2012 (UTC)
200:) 20:50, 21 August 2012 (UTC)
184:) 14:56, 20 August 2012 (UTC)
150:) 21:24, 19 August 2012 (UTC)
319:10:54, 30 August 2012 (UTC)
45:Knowledge talk:Did you know
37:this nomination's talk page
392:
41:the article's talk page
111:Created/expanded by
307:Tehelka as Metaphor
260:: ... that in 2001
312:♛♚★Vaibhav Jain★♚♛
205:The hook (Content)
120:
383:
349:
313:
303:
272:Delhi High Court
140:
110:
104:Delhi High Court
60:by —
56:The result was:
34:
391:
390:
386:
385:
384:
382:
381:
380:
366:
365:
364:
330:Hindustan Times
311:
93:
91:
87:Article history
75:
69:
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
389:
387:
379:
378:
368:
367:
363:
362:
361:
360:
343:
321:
320:
296:
295:
294:
293:
292:
291:
290:
289:
288:
287:
286:
285:
284:
283:
255:
249:
248:
225:
224:
223:
222:
221:
220:
219:
218:
217:
216:
201:
186:
185:
153:
152:
151:
131:
130:
108:
107:
90:
89:
84:
82:Back to T:TDYK
78:
76:
74:
71:
54:
53:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
388:
377:
374:
373:
371:
358:
354:
348:
344:
341:
337:
332:
331:
325:
324:
323:
322:
318:
316:
314:
308:
302:
298:
297:
281:
277:
273:
269:
268:
263:
259:
256:
253:
252:
251:
250:
246:
242:
237:
236:
235:
234:
233:
232:
231:
230:
229:
228:
227:
226:
214:
210:
206:
202:
199:
195:
190:
189:
188:
187:
183:
179:
175:
171:
170:
169:
168:
166:
162:
158:
154:
149:
145:
139:
135:
134:
133:
132:
129:
125:
124:
123:
122:
121:
118:
114:
105:
101:
100:
95:
94:
88:
85:
83:
80:
79:
72:
70:
67:
63:
59:
52:
50:
46:
42:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
328:
306:
267:Madhu Trehan
265:
257:
109:
99:Madhu Trehan
97:
73:Madhu Trehan
57:
55:
48:
31:
28:
353:BlueMoonset
264:journalist
241:BlueMoonset
62:Crisco 1492
126:Reviewed:
96:... that
370:Category
58:promoted
336:Yoninah
276:Yoninah
209:Yoninah
194:Yoninah
178:Yoninah
174:Rule D3
161:Ayanosh
144:Yoninah
113:Ayanosh
106:judges?
262:Indian
157:rules
16:<
357:talk
340:talk
280:talk
258:ALT1
245:talk
213:talk
198:talk
182:talk
165:talk
148:talk
117:talk
66:talk
43:or
372::
77:(
39:,
355:(
338:(
278:(
243:(
211:(
196:(
180:(
163:(
146:(
115:(
92:)
64:(
51:.
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
