636:
221:
435:
242:
517:
as her existance/name, country of origin, name of her husband, possibly year of death, I suppose can do that despite not speaking German. I honestly do not see the point of using redundant lower grade sources other than to formally satisfy a requirement. The article does not have the potential to reach GA status, but it is DYK material.
534:
It strikes me that if someone died over 600 years ago but is still being written about, they are clearly notable. The thesis also refers to a 16th century historian who studied her. However, I would want a clear description of the (one) currently cited source before this nom went any further (i.e. if
516:
I have been terribly busy lately, but I am not sure I have much to add anyway. If the source is deemed reliable, and DYK rules do not require more sources in this case, the situation is as simple as it can be. If it is necessary to add aditional (German-language) citations verifying basic facts such
224:
New enough and long enough. AGF on offline source in a language that I do not know (just a query: Why is the title of this book initially in German and then in
Bosnian?). Article is well sourced, including on the hooks, although only having one source (page numbers/quotations for each inline would
617:
argued that this one biography is sufficient to establish notability. DYK rules apparently do not require more than one source in this case. The sources you suggest are mainly from the 19th century, some up to 175 years old. The one mentioning her death (from 1839) clashes with the 2014 paper, as
314:
I did a bunch of online searches, and I see your dilemma. However, since you have most of her biography down, I think you should access one or two of those German sources using Google
Translate, to add a few more cites. The genealogy website doesn't look like a reliable source.
394:
who might sue or be damaged by inappropriate treatment. D12 has nothing whatsoever to do with notability, but countesses count anyway and she's plenty notable—as noted—in German. The lack of
English information is just a side effect of some
639:
In my opinion, this is good to go. We should use the highest quality sources, not the ones that pad out the bibliography the most. In any case, several additional sources have now been added to the article.
622:
issue). I have no idea how to incorporate an 1839 casual mention of this woman alongside a full biography from 2014; it is bound to look absurd. I have expanded the reference per Sionk's suggestion, however.
195:
499:(and Google Translate) it does appear that submissions are peer reviewed. The article seems to have been initially presented at a university department roundtable but later published in this journal.
93:
454:
589:
Furthermore "Maria von
Bosnien: bosanska vojvotkinja - njemaÄŤka grofica" gives a lot of sources which can be reused if we search for them, but that will require some commitment.
280:, that a single source may be sufficient for an obscure topic such as an extinct species, but not for a biography. Perhaps you could get some help from a German editor?
384:
277:
261:
663:
245:
The first hook is great, but the article is sourced to only one source, which could lead to a question of notability. Isn't anything more written about her?
88:
573:
299:(generally considered reputable) has some info about her. Would that help? The cited source is the only comprehensive biography of the subject.
36:
535:
it was published in an academic journal then what, where, when?). The ALT1 hook seems far better, less ambiguous and more interesting.
17:
263:
but in German, which I don't speak. If I understand correctly, a single source is far from ideal but not an insurmountable issue.
619:
609:! The last source is the one used in the article, and yes, it took some commitment. It is the only used source, which led
331:
230:
372:
598:
44:
143:
226:
83:
646:
606:
594:
453:
Almost, it's a conference paper. The source (in
Bosnian, with an English abstract and summary) can be found
578:
113:
481:
473:
443:
118:
65:
585:
about her dowry and the nugget of information that the king may have been the matchmaker in the wedding
296:
408:
407:
be good to go but leave me a note on my talk page if you need another set of eyes first. —
319:
185:
40:
295:
I would contend that a 15th century countess is a rather obscure topic as well. An
English language
628:
522:
356:
304:
268:
209:
641:
504:
159:
568:
584:
563:
462:
327:
285:
250:
103:
477:
439:
61:
559:
you can add these sources which I found. that ought to take care of the sourcing problem.
540:
180:
164:
624:
556:
518:
492:
396:
378:
368:
352:
346:
300:
264:
205:
657:
500:
98:
29:
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below.
610:
458:
323:
281:
246:
635:
220:
438:
What kind of source is being used here? This looks like a thesis. —
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as
614:
536:
434:
241:
476:
emphasises the need for peer review for a source to be reliable. —
403:
in any way, shape, or form a reliable source. Per The
Almightey Drill, this
123:
399:. There's no problem here. Genealogy websites, on the other hand, are
47:), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page.
184:
has traditionally been blamed for the downfall of her husband's
613:
to wonder whether that might lead to a question of notability.
496:
148:
472:
And did the conference paper go through peer review?
225:
help, but not essential for being on DYK). QPQ done.
168:
had children in her fifties and lived to be over 90?
108:
491:Just an innocent bystander here, but according to
351:- have you managed to get any further with this?
383:Now, that said, it's my understanding, per what
371:: there's rather more sources when you look for
581:I am not sure how reliable this "source is btw"
212:). Self-nominated at 11:46, 21 July 2015 (UTC).
178:: ... that the higher rank and wastefulness of
618:they give different dates (not related to the
579:page 13 mentions her as the sister of stephen
8:
374:⟨"Ulrich V" Helfenstein Maria⟩
49:No further edits should be made to this page
71:
390:, that a single source is insufficient
74:
381:and beg for some help with the German.
377:. Additional note: you can also go by
664:Passed DYK nominations from July 2015
7:
574:a little bit of information on her
392:for a biography of a living person
24:
227:'''tAD'''
18:Template:Did you know nominations
634:
564:Maria giving away an urban altar
433:
359:) 11:13, 11 September 2015 (UTC)
240:
219:
601:) 03:52, 26 October 2015 (UTC)
525:) 22:44, 17 October 2015 (UTC)
32:Please do not modify this page.
631:) 16:13, 26 October 2015 (UTC)
543:) 09:51, 18 October 2015 (UTC)
507:) 20:41, 16 October 2015 (UTC)
484:) 23:13, 11 October 2015 (UTC)
416:09:12, 20 September 2015 (UTC)
68:) 10:59, 31 October 2015 (UTC)
1:
620:Old Style and New Style dates
569:her death and supposed burial
465:) 18:21, 8 October 2015 (UTC)
446:) 23:15, 6 October 2015 (UTC)
307:) 15:32, 21 August 2015 (UTC)
271:) 10:53, 4 August 2015 (UTC)
162:is to be trusted, his in-law
651:17:15, 30 October 2015 (UTC)
288:) 11:57, 4 August 2015 (UTC)
253:) 23:38, 3 August 2015 (UTC)
337:00:10, 23 August 2015 (UTC)
276:It's my understanding, per
233:) 22:52, 24 July 2015 (UTC)
45:Knowledge talk:Did you know
37:this nomination's talk page
680:
119:Find sources (notability)
94:Earwig's Copyvio Detector
196:Paul-Édouard Delabrièrre
41:the article's talk page
497:publication's website
109:A Simple Word Counter
89:Reviewer instructions
186:House of Helfenstein
114:Reviewers' template
607:FreeatlastChitchat
595:FreeatlastChitchat
260:There is much more
160:Louis I of Hungary
158:... that, if King
336:
322:comment added by
318:— Preceding
297:genealogy website
213:
132:
131:
671:
638:
493:these guidelines
437:
414:
413:
375:
350:
335:
316:
244:
223:
203:
72:
56:The result was:
34:
679:
678:
674:
673:
672:
670:
669:
668:
654:
653:
652:
411:
409:
382:
373:
344:
317:
181:Maria of Bosnia
165:Maria of Bosnia
155:
153:
149:Article history
137:
135:Maria of Bosnia
128:
104:Character count
69:
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
677:
675:
667:
666:
656:
655:
633:
632:
605:Thanks a lot,
591:
590:
587:
582:
576:
571:
566:
553:
552:
551:
550:
549:
548:
547:
546:
545:
544:
514:
513:
512:
511:
510:
509:
508:
486:
485:
478:Chris Woodrich
474:WP:SCHOLARSHIP
467:
466:
448:
447:
440:Chris Woodrich
430:
429:
428:
427:
426:
425:
424:
423:
422:
421:
420:
419:
418:
417:
365:
364:
363:
362:
361:
360:
339:
338:
309:
308:
290:
289:
255:
254:
235:
234:
201:
200:
199:
198:
189:
170:
169:
152:
151:
146:
144:Back to T:TDYK
140:
138:
136:
133:
130:
129:
127:
126:
121:
116:
111:
106:
101:
96:
91:
86:
80:
77:
76:
54:
53:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
676:
665:
662:
661:
659:
650:
649:
645:
644:
637:
630:
626:
621:
616:
612:
608:
604:
603:
602:
600:
596:
588:
586:
583:
580:
577:
575:
572:
570:
567:
565:
562:
561:
560:
558:
542:
538:
533:
532:
531:
530:
529:
528:
527:
526:
524:
520:
515:
506:
502:
498:
494:
490:
489:
488:
487:
483:
479:
475:
471:
470:
469:
468:
464:
460:
456:
452:
451:
450:
449:
445:
441:
436:
432:
431:
415:
406:
402:
398:
393:
389:
388:actually says
386:
380:
376:
370:
367:
366:
358:
354:
348:
343:
342:
341:
340:
333:
329:
325:
321:
313:
312:
311:
310:
306:
302:
298:
294:
293:
292:
291:
287:
283:
279:
275:
274:
273:
272:
270:
266:
262:
259:
258:
257:
256:
252:
248:
243:
239:
238:
237:
236:
232:
228:
222:
218:
217:
216:
215:
214:
211:
207:
197:
193:
190:
187:
183:
182:
177:
174:
173:
172:
171:
167:
166:
161:
157:
156:
150:
147:
145:
142:
141:
134:
125:
122:
120:
117:
115:
112:
110:
107:
105:
102:
100:
97:
95:
92:
90:
87:
85:
82:
81:
79:
78:
73:
70:
67:
63:
59:
52:
50:
46:
42:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
647:
642:
592:
554:
404:
400:
391:
387:
202:
191:
179:
175:
163:
57:
55:
48:
31:
28:
204:Created by
124:Hook length
75:DYK toolbox
62:Victuallers
625:Surtsicna
557:Surtsicna
519:Surtsicna
495:from the
369:Side note
353:Prioryman
347:Surtsicna
301:Surtsicna
265:Surtsicna
206:Surtsicna
99:QPQ check
84:DYK check
658:Category
643:Spinning
593:Regards
501:Nsteffel
410:Llywelyn
385:Rule D12
332:contribs
320:unsigned
278:Rule D12
192:Reviewed
58:promoted
611:Yoninah
459:Fuebaey
397:WP:BIAS
379:WP:RD/H
324:Yoninah
282:Yoninah
247:Yoninah
405:should
648:Spark
615:Sionk
537:Sionk
16:<
629:talk
599:talk
541:talk
523:talk
505:talk
482:talk
463:talk
455:here
444:talk
357:talk
328:talk
305:talk
286:talk
269:talk
251:talk
231:talk
210:talk
176:ALT1
66:talk
401:not
60:by
43:or
660::
457:.
412:II
334:)
330:•
194::
139:(
39:,
627:(
597:(
555:@
539:(
521:(
503:(
480:(
461:(
442:(
355:(
349::
345:@
326:(
303:(
284:(
267:(
249:(
229:(
208:(
188:?
154:)
64:(
51:.
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
