380:
1002:
491:
615:(not cited in the Knowledge article) says that McCarthy and Zald characterized social protest of the 1960s and 1970s as having resulted from the rise of the "professional social movement organization," with full-time paid staff, paper-only memberships, etc. I'm curious to know more about these ideas, but the term "resource mobilization theory" leaves me totally uninterested. --
751:
701:
671:
592:
596:
movements does appear to support the rest of the hook, but it doesn't explicitly indicate that it was this work that led to development of the theory. Rearranging some text sequence could fix that. Also, the new text is a quotation from someone who isn't named; I cannot access the source, so I'm not entirely sure whether
850:, but there is no indication in the text of who is speaking in that quotation; opinions should be attributed, whether or not they are inside quotation marks. I don't give an about this, so I'm not interested in Kiefer's suggestion that I can improve the article. (Where's Piotrus, who created it and nominated it?) --
806:
I (re)wrote Alt1 because of competence in organizational theory and extensive knowledge of Zald's contributions, noting that I had not checked the article lately. Then I found a source for the hook's claim. Before I added the appropriate reference for the hook (but after I said that I should check to
1008:
hook is the only one approved: it is sourced and is backed up in the source, interesting, neutral, and at 140 characters is well within the length requirement. All other hooks have been struck to avoid confusion. The rest of the article requirements approved per Maile66's excellent review. Thanks to
595:
I just reviewed the article, hoping to be a third set of eyes that could resolve the issue, but I fear I have failed. Reference 7 does state that Zald and McCarthy developed resource mobilization theory. The new text that was added to document their application of organizational dynamics to social
196:
Zald and Ash (1966). Zald’s article with ], “Resource
Mobilization and Social Movements: A Partial Theory,” published in the '']'' in May 1977, has been described by ] as one of the most influential and frequently cited articles in the field and in the discipline.<ref name=listerv/> His 1966
610:
All in all, I'd find this more interesting if the article and hook told me something about the substance of Zald's ideas, rather than only naming the noun clusters used to describe them. In a snippet view of reference 6, I find an indication that Zald and McCarthy had a "sweeping assumption of
326:
I have added the book reference. The article is non-free, and JSTOR does not have search option, so if there is a good Zald mention in it, please cite it here of add it to the article yourself, I just don't have time to read the entire article to see if there is a mention of him worth citing,
177:
Can you provide a reference for your claim? The cited source does not support its claim, it merely cites the 1966 work that is supposed to have popularized the term. We need an independent source that would make this claim; citing the original source is not enough.
634:
choosing new causes after the elimination of polio. Before Zald, a lot sociology modeled social movements using diffusion models similar to those for spreading rumors or disease. (Charles Tilly has a useful essay, "useless
Durkheim", that is one-sided fun.)
299:
817:
I struck the definite article "the" from Alt1, which also seems fine: However, I remember Zald and
Thompson more for their SMO theory. The resource-mobilization slant seems to have been pushed by Aldon Morris: Was Gamson at Stoney
611:
motivation" for individuals' participation in social movements and that they viewed movement participation as the result of a "rational calculus in which costs of participation are weighed against the rewards". The first page of
229:
Well, yes, I know, I wrote it. hence, he is a notable social movement scholar. Neither of the two facts is very DYK-hookable in itself, though. Could use a better adjective, I guess, if you have any ideas.
197:'']'' article with ] (now Garner), “Social Movement Organizations: Growth, Decay, and Change,” was one of top 10 most frequently cited articles ever published in ''Social Forces''.<ref name=listerv/>
600:
is the source of the statement. Whoever said those words needs to be named in the text, with some indication of why the person's opinion matters (we wouldn't want people to think that it was sportscaster
795:
Orlady also requested that the person being quoted be named in the text. At this point, someone needs to make the next move, since I imagine we all want to get this approved, and it currently is not.
846:
The original hook appears to be true, but it is not explicitly stated and sourced in the article. I can't find sourced support in the article for the full content of ALT1. The article states that
265:
Maybe - do you have the source? But even so, they are not public names. That's why I don't want to quote Jeff
Goodwin; outside the field, he is not famous enough to warrant an interesting DYK. --
924:
Hmm... It seems that my ALT2 hook is very similar to the ALT1 hook that
Piotrus proposed earlier and that was reviewed favorably by Maile66, but got altered by Kiefer. The original ALT1 was:
550:
The hook contains the key phrase "analyzed ... with organizational theory", which I added. There is no support for that assertion in "Reference 7", regardless of your reading experience.
444:
Zald and McCarthy called "attention to the rising trend of professional activism in social movements and general principles of organizational dynamics to" social movement organizations.
848:
Zald and McCarthy called "attention to the rising trend of professional activism in social movements and general principles of organizational dynamics to" social movement organizations
129:
327:
particularly as I assume you have done so and could do it yourself with less time than I'd have to dedicate to the task. Based on the book ref, I can propose the following ALT1:
1086:
698:
by
Piotrus: based on timing, seems to have been approved by Maile66, "resource mobilization theory" later deemed totally uninteresting by Orlady, and hook demoted to
293:
A Retrospective on the Civil Rights
Movement: Political and Intellectual Landmarks, Aldon D. Morris, Annual Review of Sociology, Vol. 25, (1999), pp. 517-539,
626:
I share your concerns, but
Piotrus and I have limited time. The quotes you gave are extremely misleading: "characterize" is utterly wrong. Zald discussed e.g.
539:
I certainly did check it. When I did the review, Reference 7 was already there. When I opened
Reference 7 and read it, it covers what is in the hook.
748:
to differentiate the two) by Kiefer: unclear whether it was reviewed or properly approved by Maile66, presumably also covered by Orlady's
459:
Article created by by Ryan Lanham on May 8, 2006, and was a 4-sentence article on August 7, 2012 with 476 characters of readable prose
36:
17:
807:
make sure that it is properly sourced), the hook was approved---no harm, no foul, because I had added a source a few minutes later.
245:
Maybe one of
Jeffrey Paige, Charles Tilly, Aldon Morris, or Arthur Stinchecombe has made a quotable assessment of Zald?
154:
44:
828:
645:
560:
529:
428:
408:
315:
255:
209:
167:
87:
1060:(1). Sage Publications, Inc. on behalf of the Johnson Graduate School of Management, Cornell University: 154–155.
383:
It's been a week since the above, and the new ALT1 hook hasn't been reviewed. Anyone else want to look this over?
157:
is specific and more interesting. The word "notable" is a peacock word; please find a more substantive adjective.
605:). Even better would be to avoid the direct quotation entirely by describing the thought instead of quoting it.
1014:
950:
821:
800:
784:
780:
733:
638:
553:
522:
462:
5X expansion by Piotrus began on August 8, 2012, with current size of 4,392 characters of readable prose
421:
401:
388:
354:
350:
308:
248:
202:
160:
394:
I edited the proposed hook. The article was in good shape a week ago, so per AGF the new hook works.
69:
1061:
631:
29:
The following discussion is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below.
975:
544:
505:
368:
271:
236:
184:
143:
1010:
958:
946:
942:
898:
890:
886:
855:
796:
776:
772:
729:
722:
688:
620:
384:
346:
342:
114:
674:
As far as I can tell, here is where we stand with the three hooks that have been proposed:
474:
Hook is interesting, short enough at 136 characters, and sourced at the end of the sentence
61:
40:
811:
889:
developed the resource mobilization theory, which became one of the major theories on
379:
1080:
971:
540:
501:
364:
267:
232:
180:
139:
954:
894:
851:
684:
616:
110:
1001:
490:
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as
937:
881:
767:
750:
717:
700:
679:
670:
602:
591:
418:
I added the following text and documentation, which justifies the hook Alt1: (
337:
105:
1065:
612:
873:
This hook would be acceptable (it's in the article and it's sourced):
294:
47:), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page.
396:
I should double check that the wording of the new hook is supported.
597:
627:
1050:
Social Movements in an Organizational Society: Collected Essays
465:
NPOV, well written, above-average article for scholarly minded
153:
This is an understated hook. The Zald/Thompson theory of
1036:
Social Movement Organizations: Growth, Decay and Change.
450:
The following has been checked in this review by Maile66
516:
512:
92:
945:
developed one of the main theories for explaining the
193:
I have to run---family stuff. Here's from the article:
511:Actually, you did not check the alt1 hook, because
725:developed one of the main theories for explaining
1052:by Mayer N. Zald and John D. McCarthy (Review)".
517:stated an intention to double check the article
630:(as examples of professionalization) and e.g.
812:don't paraphrase an author to avoid quotation
398:(Size increased 11:57, 29 August 2012 (UTC))
8:
49:No further edits should be made to this page
814:. Orlady is welcome to improve the article.
480:Time spent on review approximately one hour
146:). Self nom at 16:57, 10 August 2012 (UTC)
477:Duplication Detector run, no copyvio found
677:Original hook: never approved (... that
1087:Passed DYK nominations from August 2012
1027:
456:QPQ done by Piotrus on August 10, 2012
972:Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus
365:Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus
268:Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus
233:Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus
181:Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus
7:
513:I just added the reference at 13:41
494:Good to go - Bio in Sociology field
295:https://www.jstor.org/stable/223515
24:
1048:Oliver, Pamela E. (March 1989). "
18:Template:Did you know nominations
1054:Administrative Science Quarterly
1034:Zald, Mayer N. and Roberta Ash,
1000:
803:) 21:47, 5 September 2012 (UTC)
749:
699:
669:
590:
489:
378:
1017:) 01:57, 7 September 2012 (UTC)
961:) 02:11, 6 September 2012 (UTC)
901:) 22:18, 5 September 2012 (UTC)
858:) 22:13, 5 September 2012 (UTC)
32:Please do not modify this page.
754:since it uses the same phrase.
623:) 15:13, 29 August 2012 (UTC)
547:) 12:35, 29 August 2012 (UTC)
508:) 11:36, 29 August 2012 (UTC)
391:) 03:06, 29 August 2012 (UTC)
1:
1009:everyone for their patience.
981:05:08, 6 September 2012 (UTC)
835:21:58, 5 September 2012 (UTC)
704:for that reason among others.
155:social movement organizations
74:02:27, 7 September 2012 (UTC)
969:I think it's a good hook. --
536:11:45, 29 August 2012 (UTC)
435:11:45, 29 August 2012 (UTC))
415:11:19, 29 August 2012 (UTC)
374:00:34, 22 August 2012 (UTC)
262:11:29, 11 August 2012 (UTC)
242:01:48, 11 August 2012 (UTC)
190:23:43, 10 August 2012 (UTC)
174:23:32, 10 August 2012 (UTC)
744:Revised ALT1 (I'll call it
652:15:57, 29 August 2012 (UTC)
567:12:44, 29 August 2012 (UTC)
322:22:35, 21 August 2012 (UTC)
300:Tilly and Perrow and McAdam
277:16:48, 11 August 2012 (UTC)
216:23:52, 10 August 2012 (UTC)
45:Knowledge talk:Did you know
37:this nomination's talk page
1103:
773:John D. McCarthy
343:John D. McCarthy
1038:Social Forces 44:327-341
468:Every paragraph sourced
290:Here are some sources:
41:the article's talk page
515:, a half hour after I
446:
199:
951:resource mobilization
785:resource-mobilization
781:organizational theory
734:resource mobilization
442:
355:resource-mobilization
351:organizational theory
194:
138:Created/expanded by
130:Russell W. Volckmann
632:The March of Dimes
834:
783:and so developed
651:
566:
535:
434:
414:
353:and so developed
321:
261:
215:
173:
147:
1094:
1070:
1069:
1045:
1039:
1032:
1004:
978:
947:social movements
943:John D. McCarthy
891:social movements
887:John D. McCarthy
833:
831:
826:
819:
777:social movements
753:
730:social movements
723:John D. McCarthy
703:
689:social movements
673:
650:
648:
643:
636:
594:
565:
563:
558:
551:
534:
532:
527:
520:
493:
433:
431:
426:
419:
413:
411:
406:
399:
382:
371:
347:social movements
320:
318:
313:
306:
274:
260:
258:
253:
246:
239:
214:
212:
207:
200:
187:
172:
170:
165:
158:
137:
115:social movements
72:
67:
64:
56:The result was:
34:
1102:
1101:
1097:
1096:
1095:
1093:
1092:
1091:
1077:
1076:
1075:
1074:
1073:
1047:
1046:
1042:
1033:
1029:
1024:
980:
976:
829:
822:
820:
768:Mayer Zald
646:
639:
637:
561:
554:
552:
530:
523:
521:
429:
422:
420:
409:
402:
400:
397:
373:
369:
338:Mayer Zald
316:
309:
307:
276:
272:
256:
249:
247:
241:
237:
210:
203:
201:
189:
185:
168:
161:
159:
99:
97:
93:Article history
81:
75:
70:
65:
62:
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
1100:
1098:
1090:
1089:
1079:
1078:
1072:
1071:
1040:
1026:
1025:
1023:
1020:
1019:
1018:
997:
996:
995:
994:
993:
992:
991:
990:
989:
988:
987:
986:
985:
984:
983:
982:
970:
964:
963:
926:
925:
911:
910:
909:
908:
907:
906:
905:
904:
903:
902:
864:
863:
862:
861:
860:
859:
839:
838:
837:
836:
815:
808:
793:
792:
791:
790:
789:
756:
755:
741:
740:
739:
738:
706:
705:
692:
683:was a notable
666:
665:
664:
663:
662:
661:
660:
659:
658:
657:
656:
655:
654:
653:
607:
606:
577:
576:
575:
574:
573:
572:
571:
570:
569:
568:
496:
495:
486:
485:
484:
483:
482:
481:
478:
475:
469:
466:
463:
460:
457:
441:
440:
439:
438:
437:
436:
395:
363:
360:
359:
324:
323:
304:
303:
302:
297:
288:
287:
286:
285:
284:
283:
282:
281:
280:
279:
278:
266:
231:
222:
221:
220:
219:
218:
217:
179:
135:
134:
133:
132:
120:
119:
109:was a notable
96:
95:
90:
88:Back to T:TDYK
84:
82:
80:
77:
54:
53:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
1099:
1088:
1085:
1084:
1082:
1067:
1063:
1059:
1055:
1051:
1044:
1041:
1037:
1031:
1028:
1021:
1016:
1012:
1007:
1003:
999:
998:
979:
973:
968:
967:
966:
965:
962:
960:
956:
952:
948:
944:
940:
939:
934:
930:
929:
928:
927:
923:
922:
921:
920:
919:
918:
917:
916:
915:
914:
913:
912:
900:
896:
892:
888:
884:
883:
878:
875:
874:
872:
871:
870:
869:
868:
867:
866:
865:
857:
853:
849:
845:
844:
843:
842:
841:
840:
832:
827:
825:
816:
813:
809:
805:
804:
802:
798:
794:
788:
786:
782:
778:
774:
770:
769:
764:
760:
759:
758:
757:
752:
747:
743:
742:
737:
735:
731:
728:
724:
720:
719:
714:
710:
709:
708:
707:
702:
697:
693:
690:
686:
682:
681:
676:
675:
672:
668:
667:
649:
644:
642:
633:
629:
625:
624:
622:
618:
614:
609:
608:
604:
599:
598:Pamela Oliver
593:
589:
588:
587:
586:
585:
584:
583:
582:
581:
580:
579:
578:
564:
559:
557:
549:
548:
546:
542:
538:
537:
533:
528:
526:
518:
514:
510:
509:
507:
503:
500:
499:
498:
497:
492:
488:
487:
479:
476:
473:
470:
467:
464:
461:
458:
455:
454:
453:
452:
451:
448:
447:
445:
432:
427:
425:
417:
416:
412:
407:
405:
393:
392:
390:
386:
381:
377:
376:
375:
372:
366:
358:
356:
352:
348:
344:
340:
339:
334:
330:
329:
328:
319:
314:
312:
305:
301:
298:
296:
292:
291:
289:
275:
269:
264:
263:
259:
254:
252:
244:
243:
240:
234:
228:
227:
226:
225:
224:
223:
213:
208:
206:
198:
192:
191:
188:
182:
176:
175:
171:
166:
164:
156:
152:
151:
150:
149:
148:
145:
141:
131:
127:
124:
123:
122:
121:
118:
116:
112:
108:
107:
101:
100:
94:
91:
89:
86:
85:
78:
76:
73:
68:
59:
52:
50:
46:
42:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
1057:
1053:
1049:
1043:
1035:
1030:
1005:
936:
932:
931:
880:
876:
847:
823:
766:
762:
761:
745:
726:
716:
712:
711:
695:
678:
640:
613:this article
555:
524:
471:
449:
443:
423:
403:
361:
336:
332:
331:
325:
310:
250:
204:
195:
162:
136:
125:
104:
102:
57:
55:
48:
31:
28:
1011:BlueMoonset
953:theory? --
797:BlueMoonset
765:: ... that
715:: ... that
685:sociologist
385:BlueMoonset
335:: ... that
111:sociologist
1022:References
977:reply here
938:Mayer Zald
882:Mayer Zald
830:.Wolfowitz
718:Mayer Zald
680:Mayer Zald
647:.Wolfowitz
603:Pam Oliver
562:.Wolfowitz
531:.Wolfowitz
430:.Wolfowitz
410:.Wolfowitz
370:reply here
317:.Wolfowitz
273:reply here
257:.Wolfowitz
238:reply here
211:.Wolfowitz
186:reply here
169:.Wolfowitz
106:Mayer Zald
79:Mayer Zald
935:... that
879:... that
775:analyzed
694:Original
345:analyzed
103:... that
1081:Category
126:Reviewed
58:promoted
1066:2392997
787:theory?
736:theory?
541:Maile66
502:Maile66
357:theory?
140:Piotrus
63:Pumpkin
1064:
974:|
955:Orlady
949:, the
933:urALT1
895:Orlady
852:Orlady
824:Kiefer
818:Brook?
732:, the
641:Kiefer
617:Orlady
556:Kiefer
525:Kiefer
472:Alt 1
424:Kiefer
404:Kiefer
367:|
311:Kiefer
270:|
251:Kiefer
235:|
205:Kiefer
183:|
163:Kiefer
1062:JSTOR
779:with
763:ALT1K
746:ALT1K
628:PIRGs
349:with
16:<
1015:talk
1006:ALT2
959:talk
941:and
899:talk
893:? --
885:and
877:ALT2
856:talk
801:talk
771:and
727:the
721:and
713:ALT1
696:ALT1
621:talk
545:talk
506:talk
389:talk
341:and
333:ALT1
144:talk
71:talk
687:of
113:of
66:Sky
60:by
43:or
1083::
1058:34
1056:.
810:I
691:?)
519:.
362:--
230:--
178:--
128::
83:(
39:,
1068:.
1013:(
957:(
897:(
854:(
799:(
619:(
543:(
504:(
387:(
142:(
117:?
98:)
51:.
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.