373:
207:
234:" may not be entirely accurate, but this is how it was presented at the time, and it's not like the child was found to be really young in the end. We could say "was thought to be so unexpectedly old", but that would sound clumsy and much less hooky. (Might not have gone through the bear grease.) And can you imagine that old hook ".. that
299:? What do I know about your feet? Back to our sheep (as the French say): I think "was" in the hook suggests that this dating is from the past, so I'd say it's legit! But I found another way in which we could play on the "macho" side of this: paleontologists have no idea if the "Mojokerto child" was a boy or a girl. So how about this:
210:
New enough; long enough. Neutral. No plagiarism or copyvio in the sources I could access (in reference 12, page 109 of
Carbonell et al. 2008 is cited. There is no page 109 in that article and it isn't page 209 either). Hook is very hooky (it grabbed me and I'm not easily grabbed as I'm wriggly and
93:
384:
taken on trust. I have struck ALT1 due to above comment and because it is more wordy than the original. Good to go with original hook which is referenced to offline citation #11, taken AGF. --
263:
as trusted reviewers (Storye book anyway, EEng will just give us somebody to pick on) who might have an opinion on whether we can squeeze through this hook on the basis of its hookiness.
211:
covered in bear grease) but the sample probably wasn't really as old as first thought (and you went all macho with "he was"). I'd let it through, but perhaps a second opinion would help.
88:
429:
255:
I'm not a bear (honestly, a girl can't slather herself in bear grease nowadays without being called ursine? It's mammalian correctness gone mad!) Pinging
36:
17:
44:
143:
83:
113:
389:
118:
65:
40:
268:
216:
408:
362:
332:
249:
194:
327:
Old child and gender uncertainty all in one? We're getting close to Bieber territory over here!
103:
400:
385:
350:
256:
61:
318:
313:
236:
166:
160:
381:
346:
280:
264:
227:
212:
423:
404:
377:
358:
328:
245:
190:
98:
29:
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below.
372:
296:
230:: Sorry about the bungled reference: it is p. 199 and I have corrected it. "He
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as
292:
288:
284:
206:
354:
260:
123:
380:, let's put this nom/child/bear out of its agony. Initial review by
47:), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page.
283:: Being ursine does not make you a bear. I would have called you
317:
was so unexpectedly old that he (or she?) was discussed in a
244:
is 48% female"? Anyway, a second opinion would help! Cheers!
240:
is half female" reworded into the more accurate "... that
148:
108:
164:was so unexpectedly old that it was discussed in a
357:: so are we good to go with the original hook?
197:). Self nominated at 04:05, 2 July 2014 (UTC)
8:
291:, and I wouldn't want to associate you with
49:No further edits should be made to this page
71:
74:
430:Passed DYK nominations from July 2014
7:
287:, but for all I know you might be
182:: This is my third DYK nomination.
24:
45:Knowledge (XXG) talk:Did you know
18:Template:Did you know nominations
371:
205:
32:Please do not modify this page.
1:
365:) 02:44, 4 July 2014 (UTC)
252:) 10:11, 2 July 2014 (UTC)
37:this nomination's talk page
446:
411:) 09:10, 4 July 2014 (UTC)
392:) 08:53, 4 July 2014 (UTC)
335:) 10:53, 2 July 2014 (UTC)
271:) 10:33, 2 July 2014 (UTC)
219:) 09:18, 2 July 2014 (UTC)
68:) 00:49, 6 July 2014 (UTC)
119:Find sources (notability)
94:Earwig's Copyvio Detector
41:the article's talk page
109:A Simple Word Counter
89:Reviewer instructions
114:Reviewers' template
293:kitchen implements
399:Great, thank you
198:
132:
131:
437:
375:
209:
188:
72:
60:by —
56:The result was:
34:
445:
444:
440:
439:
438:
436:
435:
434:
420:
419:
418:
314:Mojokerto child
228:Writhing ursine
161:Mojokerto child
155:
153:
149:Article history
137:
135:Mojokerto child
128:
104:Character count
69:
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
443:
441:
433:
432:
422:
421:
417:
416:
415:
414:
413:
412:
394:
393:
376:OK, thank you
343:
342:
341:
340:
339:
338:
337:
336:
325:
324:
323:
301:
300:
275:
274:
273:
272:
221:
220:
186:
185:
184:
183:
177:
172:
171:
152:
151:
146:
144:Back to T:TDYK
140:
138:
136:
133:
130:
129:
127:
126:
121:
116:
111:
106:
101:
96:
91:
86:
80:
77:
76:
54:
53:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
442:
431:
428:
427:
425:
410:
406:
402:
398:
397:
396:
395:
391:
387:
383:
379:
374:
370:
369:
368:
367:
366:
364:
360:
356:
352:
348:
334:
330:
326:
322:
321:cover story"?
320:
319:Time Magazine
316:
315:
308:
305:
304:
303:
302:
298:
294:
290:
286:
282:
279:
278:
277:
276:
270:
266:
262:
258:
254:
253:
251:
247:
243:
239:
238:
233:
229:
225:
224:
223:
222:
218:
214:
208:
204:
203:
202:
201:
200:
196:
192:
181:
178:
176:
175:
174:
173:
169:
168:
167:Time Magazine
163:
162:
158:... that the
157:
156:
150:
147:
145:
142:
141:
134:
125:
122:
120:
117:
115:
112:
110:
107:
105:
102:
100:
97:
95:
92:
90:
87:
85:
82:
81:
79:
78:
73:
70:
67:
63:
59:
52:
50:
46:
42:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
344:
312:
310:
306:
241:
235:
231:
187:
179:
170:cover story?
165:
159:
57:
55:
48:
31:
28:
401:Storye book
386:Storye book
351:Storye book
297:plantigrade
257:Storye book
189:Created by
124:Hook length
75:DYK toolbox
62:Crisco 1492
285:Ursa Minor
311:that the
281:Bellemora
99:QPQ check
84:DYK check
424:Category
405:Madalibi
378:Madalibi
359:Madalibi
329:Madalibi
295:. Maybe
246:Madalibi
191:Madalibi
58:promoted
309:: "...
180:Comment
242:Batman
237:Batman
382:Belle
347:Belle
289:Major
265:Belle
213:Belle
16:<
409:talk
390:talk
363:talk
355:EEng
333:talk
307:ALT1
269:talk
261:EEng
259:and
250:talk
217:talk
195:talk
66:talk
232:was
43:or
426::
403:!
353:,
349:,
199:.
139:(
39:,
407:(
388:(
361:(
345:@
331:(
267:(
248:(
226:@
215:(
193:(
154:)
64:(
51:.
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
