Knowledge

Template:Did you know nominations/Negativity Bias

Source đź“ť

141: 188: 204: 144:
Article has verifiability and original research tags, and numerous empty sections that have to be addressed before this could be ready for the main page. Hook is not properly formatted–article title needs to be bolded, "super sensitive" sounds odd, and the clause after the semicolon should probably
207:
Yes, it's an essay. Large parts of it are unsourced, and many of the sources that are used look very dubious (personal blogs, personal websites etc). The hook is also unacceptable ("are we not positive human beings?" - yuk). There may be a good article waiting to be written on this topic, but I'm
166:
We have expanded the article so that there are no more blank sections. The article title is now bolded. The article was moved to the correct space. We can change "super sensitive" to "highly sensitive" in order to fix the odd term. So, the new hook should read: "Did you know...our instinctive
230: 36: 17: 44: 80: 146: 178: 127: 111: 40: 196: 213: 174: 123: 119: 107: 29:
The following discussion is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below.
192: 154: 169: 97: 209: 187: 224: 115: 140: 203: 101:
encompassed throughout our world; are we not the positive beings we think we are?
150: 62: 35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as
47:), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. 173:
encompassed throughout our world; are we not positive human beings?
95:... that our instinctive behaviors are super sensitive to the 145:
be trimmed. Article title needs to be moved (currently at
68:
Insufficient progress toward resolving outstanding issues
191:
Needs a review. Looks like an essay though. â€” 
85: 8: 49:No further edits should be made to this page 231:Failed DYK nominations from October 2012 167:behaviors are highly sensitive to the 7: 66:  16:10, 12 November 2012 (UTC) 24: 18:Template:Did you know nominations 202: 186: 139: 130:) at 06:04, 3 October 2012 (UTC) 32:Please do not modify this page. 216:) 08:47, 6 November 2012 (UTC) 208:afraid this article isn't it. 199:) 14:26, 31 October 2012 (UTC) 181:) 19:34, 25 October 2012 (UTC) 1: 157:) 08:38, 3 October 2012 (UTC) 45:Knowledge talk:Did you know 37:this nomination's talk page 247: 147:Knowledge:Negativity bias 41:the article's talk page 106:Created/expanded by 175:Brandi Carolyn Hull 131: 122:). Nominated by 238: 206: 190: 143: 105: 56:The result was: 34: 246: 245: 241: 240: 239: 237: 236: 235: 221: 220: 219: 92: 90: 86:Article history 74: 72:Negativity bias 67: 30: 22: 21: 20: 12: 11: 5: 244: 242: 234: 233: 223: 222: 218: 217: 200: 184: 183: 182: 161: 160: 159: 158: 137: 103: 102: 89: 88: 83: 81:Back to T:TDYK 77: 75: 73: 70: 54: 53: 25: 23: 15: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 243: 232: 229: 228: 226: 215: 211: 205: 201: 198: 194: 189: 185: 180: 176: 172: 171: 165: 164: 163: 162: 156: 152: 148: 142: 138: 136: 135: 134: 133: 132: 129: 125: 124:BrandiCarolyn 121: 117: 113: 109: 108:BrandiCarolyn 100: 99: 94: 93: 87: 84: 82: 79: 78: 71: 69: 65: 64: 59: 52: 50: 46: 42: 38: 33: 27: 26: 19: 168: 104: 96: 61: 57: 55: 48: 31: 28: 193:Crisco 1492 170:negativity 98:negativity 210:Prioryman 225:Category 116:Ups46694 58:rejected 151:Sasata 63:Allen3 16:< 214:talk 197:talk 179:talk 155:talk 128:talk 120:talk 112:talk 149:). 114:), 60:by 43:or 227:: 76:( 39:, 212:( 195:( 177:( 153:( 126:( 118:( 110:( 91:) 51:.

Index

Template:Did you know nominations
this nomination's talk page
the article's talk page
Knowledge talk:Did you know
Allen3
Back to T:TDYK
Article history
negativity
BrandiCarolyn
talk
Ups46694
talk
BrandiCarolyn
talk

Knowledge:Negativity bias
Sasata
talk
negativity
Brandi Carolyn Hull
talk

Crisco 1492
talk

Prioryman
talk
Category
Failed DYK nominations from October 2012

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

↑