Knowledge

Template:Did you know nominations/New Zealand Parole Board

Source 📝

322:"the "standard" minimum non-parole period was 10 years and the court could only impose a longer minimum non-parole period in exceptional circumstances....Nowadays judges must impose a minimum non-parole period of at least 17 years if aggravating factors are present. The 30-year non-parole period given to William Bell who murdered three people at the Mt Wellington-Panmure RSA in 2001, is the longest non-parole period handed down. Graeme Burton, who murdered Paul Anderson in May 1992 and then went on to murder Karl Kuchenbecker in January 2007, has a 26-year non-parole period." vs "the "standard" minimum non-parole period was 10 years and the court could only impose a longer minimum non-parole period in exceptional circumstances. Nowadays judges must impose a minimum non-parole period of at least 17 years if aggravating factors are present. The 30-year non-parole period given to William Bell who murdered three people at the Mt Wellington-Panmure RSA in 2001, is the longest non-parole period handed down so far. Graeme Burton, who murdered Paul Anderson in May 1992, was released on parole in July 2006, and then went on to murder Karl Kuchenbecker in January 2007, has a 26-year non-parole period." This is just egregious. 319:"keep the worst criminals at high risk of re-offending behind bars, even after they have finished their sentences. Prime Minister John Key said the offenders would remain at a secure facility under a new "civil detention order" until the Parole Board was convinced they were safe for release" vs "keep the worst criminals at high risk of re-offending behind bars, even after they've finished their sentences...Prime Minister John Key said the offenders would remain at a secure facility under a new "civil detention order" until the Parole Board was convinced they were safe for release." 224: 300: 156: 426:"Fair use is a limitation and exception to the exclusive right granted by copyright law to the author of a creative work. In United States copyright law, fair use is a doctrine that permits limited use of copyrighted material without acquiring permission from the rights holders. Examples of fair use include commentary, criticism, news reporting, research, teaching, library archiving and scholarship." 313:"parole was still the best tool available to reintegrate criminals into society but it was important that for high risk offenders, moving out of prison was a gradual process so as to reduce the risk of reoffending" vs "Parole was still the best tool available to reintegrate criminals into society, but it was important that move out of prison was gradual, so as to reduce the risk of reoffending." 242: 464:"Bare facts are in the public domain. Works must show sufficient human creativity to be eligible to copyright at all. A second category of works that in general cannot be copyright protected are those that have no (or no significant) creative content: they do not pass the threshold of originality." 443:
Sorry, but no: three of the examples provided are longer than a single sentence, the usage in this case does not really fall under fair use (which is more helpful in justifying brief quotation of a copyrighted source), and quite frankly most of the examples here are outright copyvio, not
316:"did not blame Bell for the breaches of his release conditions. Instead it blamed his probation officer who did not set up required appointments" vs "does not blame Bell for the breaches, but more his probation officer, who did not set up required appointments" 337:
There's a discussion on whether or not the material is copyrighted in the first place on the article's talk page. Can I please suggest you have a look there? And if the material is not copyrighted, can it be used or is there still a problem with it?
310:"Corrections claimed it had improved its parole management following its disastrous mishandling of Graeme Burton's case" vs "Corrections claimed it had improved its parole management following its disastrous mishandling of Graeme Burton's parole" 178:(edit conflict) The article has been deleted (G12), but I suspect that the last word hasn't been spoken about this. I suggest we'll let this nomination sit for a while and see what happens. 358:
I did. If that discussion determines that the Parole Board material is free to use, that would need to be properly attributed to indicate that it is copied directly. However,
544: 116:: A new article (6 days old) that I have just come across. Pretty substantial work, but it's got a conflict of interest tag on it. Is this acceptable at DYK? 504: 36: 481:
One, law in one country and another can be different. Two, how you phrase the facts can be copyrighted. I believe it's noted elsewhere. — 
245:
New enough when nominated, large, COI issue resolved. Hook is okay, though it may be preferable to be a bit more concrete... – 
17: 428:
Knowledge is both commentary and scholarship and the sentences above are all examples of news reporting. No problem once again.
396:
Yes, but per the DYK rules, direct copying of sources with Knowledge-combatible licensing needs to be attributed as outlined at
418:"Depending on the context and extent of the paraphrasing, limited close paraphrase may be permitted under the doctrine of 40: 413: 44: 384:
Material taken from the Parole Board website is attributed in the citations. And no permission is required to use it.
81: 263: 102: 459: 527: 512: 497: 474: 433: 389: 128: 486: 268: 232: 97: 65: 449: 422:; close paraphrase of a single sentence is not as much of a concern as an entire section or article." 405: 397: 371: 327: 345: 285: 205: 185: 144: 136: 250: 424:
Each of the examples you have provided are single sentences...so I don't see any problem. Also
29:
The following discussion is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below.
523: 508: 493: 470: 429: 385: 124: 482: 228: 164: 61: 467: 445: 401: 367: 323: 340: 280: 200: 180: 140: 132: 223: 538: 458:
These statements all come from newspaper articles - and the news cannot copyrighted.
246: 299: 155: 160: 241: 35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as
419: 47:), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. 400:; in this case, attribution is a separate requirement from citation. 360:
none of the material referred to above is affected by that discussion
303:- Very close paraphrasing of multiple sources. Compare for example: 398:
Knowledge:PLAGIARISM#Attributing_text_copied_from_other_sources
227:
Needs a full review now that article is back and seems stable.
100:
has the strictest parole conditions ever imposed by the
86: 271:'s parole, considered the strictest they ever imposed? 492:
Beliefs are not much help - unless you're religious.
362:. All examples given are from newspaper sites, which 522:The text of newspapers are certainly copyrighted. 278:Thanks for the review. The alt hook works for me. 507:. I'm not sure we want this on the front page. 503:Your battleground behaviour was raised in your 8: 49:No further edits should be made to this page 545:Failed DYK nominations from August 2012 7: 159:Article deleted due to copyvio??? -- 468:News Texts not Subject to Copyright 466:For a court case on this issue see 477:) 04:14, 17 September 2012 (UTC) 198:The article is back in mainspace. 24: 500:) 05:47, 19 September 2012 (UTC) 489:) 14:46, 18 September 2012 (UTC) 392:) 20:01, 16 September 2012 (UTC) 18:Template:Did you know nominations 530:) 09:34, 19 September 2012 (UTC) 515:) 09:41, 19 September 2012 (UTC) 452:) 21:08, 16 September 2012 (UTC) 436:) 20:11, 16 September 2012 (UTC) 408:) 21:08, 16 September 2012 (UTC) 374:) 12:27, 16 September 2012 (UTC) 330:) 01:35, 16 September 2012 (UTC) 298: 253:) 00:31, 15 September 2012 (UTC) 240: 222: 154: 147:) at 18:30, 28 August 2012 (UTC) 68:) 15:21, 19 September 2012 (UTC) 235:) 15:19, 8 September 2012 (UTC) 32:Please do not modify this page. 351:06:48, 16 September 2012 (UTC) 291:01:12, 15 September 2012 (UTC) 1: 211:00:31, 3 September 2012 (UTC) 167:) 17:50, 31 August 2012 (UTC) 267:imposed 17 restrictions on 191:17:58, 31 August 2012 (UTC) 45:Knowledge talk:Did you know 37:this nomination's talk page 561: 366:definitively copyrighted. 264:New Zealand Parole Board 103:New Zealand Parole Board 73:New Zealand Parole Board 41:the article's talk page 414:WP:Close paraphrasing 269:Stewart Murray Wilson 123:Created/expanded by 98:Stewart Murray Wilson 460:WP: Public domain 148: 139:). Nominated by 552: 348: 343: 302: 288: 283: 244: 226: 208: 203: 188: 183: 158: 122: 56:The result was: 34: 560: 559: 555: 554: 553: 551: 550: 549: 535: 534: 533: 346: 341: 286: 281: 261:: ... that the 206: 201: 186: 181: 93: 91: 87:Article history 75: 69: 30: 22: 21: 20: 12: 11: 5: 558: 556: 548: 547: 537: 536: 532: 531: 520: 519: 518: 517: 516: 456: 455: 454: 453: 444:paraphrasing. 438: 437: 410: 409: 382: 381: 380: 379: 378: 377: 376: 375: 353: 352: 332: 331: 320: 317: 314: 311: 305: 304: 295: 294: 293: 292: 273: 272: 255: 254: 237: 236: 219: 218: 217: 216: 215: 214: 213: 212: 193: 192: 171: 170: 169: 168: 120: 119: 118: 117: 108: 107: 90: 89: 84: 82:Back to T:TDYK 78: 76: 74: 71: 54: 53: 25: 23: 15: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 557: 546: 543: 542: 540: 529: 525: 521: 514: 510: 506: 502: 501: 499: 495: 491: 490: 488: 484: 480: 479: 478: 476: 472: 469: 465: 461: 451: 447: 442: 441: 440: 439: 435: 431: 427: 423: 421: 415: 412: 411: 407: 403: 399: 395: 394: 393: 391: 387: 373: 369: 365: 361: 357: 356: 355: 354: 350: 349: 344: 336: 335: 334: 333: 329: 325: 321: 318: 315: 312: 309: 308: 307: 306: 301: 297: 296: 290: 289: 284: 277: 276: 275: 274: 270: 266: 265: 260: 257: 256: 252: 248: 243: 239: 238: 234: 230: 225: 221: 220: 210: 209: 204: 197: 196: 195: 194: 190: 189: 184: 177: 176: 175: 174: 173: 172: 166: 162: 157: 153: 152: 151: 150: 149: 146: 142: 138: 134: 130: 126: 115: 112: 111: 110: 109: 105: 104: 99: 95: 94: 88: 85: 83: 80: 79: 72: 70: 67: 63: 59: 52: 50: 46: 42: 38: 33: 27: 26: 19: 524:Secretlondon 509:Secretlondon 494:Offender9000 471:Offender9000 463: 457: 430:Offender9000 425: 417: 386:Offender9000 383: 363: 359: 339: 279: 262: 258: 199: 179: 125:Offender9000 121: 113: 101: 57: 55: 48: 31: 28: 483:Crisco 1492 229:BlueMoonset 62:BlueMoonset 446:Nikkimaria 402:Nikkimaria 368:Nikkimaria 324:Nikkimaria 141:Schwede66 133:Schwede66 96:... that 539:Category 420:fair use 247:Muboshgu 58:rejected 462:states 342:Schwede 282:Schwede 202:Schwede 182:Schwede 114:Comment 416:says: 161:PFHLai 16:< 528:talk 513:talk 498:talk 487:talk 475:talk 450:talk 434:talk 406:talk 390:talk 372:talk 328:talk 259:ALT1 251:talk 233:talk 165:talk 145:talk 137:talk 129:talk 66:talk 505:RFC 364:are 131:), 60:by 43:or 541:: 347:66 287:66 207:66 187:66 77:( 39:, 526:( 511:( 496:( 485:( 473:( 448:( 432:( 404:( 388:( 370:( 326:( 249:( 231:( 163:( 143:( 135:( 127:( 106:? 92:) 64:( 51:.

Index

Template:Did you know nominations
this nomination's talk page
the article's talk page
Knowledge talk:Did you know
BlueMoonset
talk
Back to T:TDYK
Article history
Stewart Murray Wilson
New Zealand Parole Board
Offender9000
talk
Schwede66
talk
Schwede66
talk

PFHLai
talk
Schwede
66
Schwede
66

BlueMoonset
talk

Muboshgu
talk
New Zealand Parole Board

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.