30:
177:
93:
356:
376:
297:
321:
I'm saying that footnote 11 is used twice, and neither time is it citing the specific hook ("a public authority's decision can be invalidated if based on an incorrect fact"). Indeed, the wording of the hook is closer to that in the section headed "Applicability of the ground of error as to material
300:
Looks good, though I am yet to undertake a plagiarism check. Before I do, it would be good for the hook text to be more explicitly included in the prose. Should only be a 30 second job :) Thanks, -
310:
Thanks for reviewing the nomination. Could you clarify if you are suggesting that the article or the hook be reworded? As indicated, the hook is referenced by footnote 11. See also footnote 13. —
401:
241:
61:
322:
fact in
Singapore", which would benefit for a rewording of the first paragraph to make the point clearer (ensuring it remains cited). -
17:
185:
176:
97:
160:
48:
249:: The article was created by moving it from a sandbox on 19 January 2013. The hook is referenced by footnote 11.
230:
held that a public authority's decision can be invalidated if based on a misconception or ignorance of a fact?
224:
200:
269:
76:
364:
144:
88:
265:
257:
338:
315:
285:
261:
273:
56:. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page; such as this archived
215:
191:
122:
42:
360:
277:
140:
206:
held that a public authority's decision can be invalidated if based on an incorrect fact?
380:
334:
323:
311:
302:
281:
355:
395:
117:
92:
29:
329:
OK, I rephrased the text at footnote 34 slightly, and also reworded the hook (see
375:
296:
221:
197:
107:. Unless there is consensus to re-open the archived discussion here.
359:
Further review needed now that issues have been addressed.
165:
8:
110:No further edits should be made to this page
402:Passed DYK nominations from January 2013
37:The following is an archived discussion
326: 18:30, 10 February 2013 (UTC)
7:
383: 22:48, 17 February 2013 (UTC)
305: 13:59, 10 February 2013 (UTC)
24:
288:) at 18:16, 19 January 2013 (UTC)
18:Template:Did you know nominations
374:
354:
318:) 14:15, 10 February 2013 (UTC)
295:
175:
147:) 01:05, 18 February 2013 (UTC).
91:
28:
367:) 21:27, 17 February 2013 (UTC)
341:) 13:51, 12 February 2013 (UTC)
54:Please do not modify this page
1:
212:: ... that in the 1991 case
418:
333:). Hope that's better. —
184:... that in the 1991
118:talk page guidelines
228:(building pictured)
204:(building pictured)
186:administrative law
289:
280:). Nominated by
216:Re Fong Thin Choo
192:Re Fong Thin Choo
152:Re Fong Thin Choo
43:Re Fong Thin Choo
409:
378:
358:
299:
255:
179:
135:The result was:
130:
113:
95:
71:, the nominated
38:
32:
417:
416:
412:
411:
410:
408:
407:
406:
392:
391:
390:
181:
172:
170:
166:Article history
154:
148:
114:
108:
36:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
415:
413:
405:
404:
394:
393:
389:
388:
387:
386:
385:
384:
369:
368:
349:
348:
347:
346:
345:
344:
343:
342:
307:
306:
253:
252:
251:
250:
244:
232:
231:
207:
173:
169:
168:
163:
161:Back to T:TDYK
157:
155:
153:
150:
133:
132:
49:DYK nomination
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
414:
403:
400:
399:
397:
382:
377:
373:
372:
371:
370:
366:
362:
357:
353:
352:
351:
350:
340:
336:
332:
328:
327:
325:
320:
319:
317:
313:
309:
308:
304:
298:
294:
293:
292:
291:
290:
287:
283:
279:
275:
271:
267:
263:
259:
248:
245:
243:
239:
236:
235:
234:
233:
229:
226:
223:
219:
218:
217:
211:
208:
205:
202:
199:
195:
194:
193:
187:
183:
182:
180:
178:
167:
164:
162:
159:
158:
151:
149:
146:
142:
138:
131:
128:
126:
120:
119:
111:
106:
105:
101:
96:
94:
90:
85:
84:
80:
74:
70:
69:
65:
59:
55:
51:
50:
45:
44:
39:
31:
27:
26:
19:
379:Approved. -
330:
266:KONGzhenning
256:Created by
254:
246:
237:
227:
214:
213:
209:
203:
190:
189:
174:
136:
134:
129:information.
124:
116:
109:
103:
99:
89:Did you know
87:
82:
78:
72:
67:
63:
57:
53:
47:
41:
35:
34:
361:BlueMoonset
141:Carabinieri
242:Andy Mineo
225:High Court
201:High Court
58:nomination
381:Jarry1250
335:SMUconlaw
324:Jarry1250
312:SMUconlaw
303:Jarry1250
282:Smuconlaw
258:Kaden-ghz
222:Singapore
198:Singapore
86:, or the
396:Category
238:Reviewed
137:promoted
115:See the
247:Comment
73:article
274:Zzeggy
33:
331:ALT 1
188:case
16:<
365:talk
339:talk
316:talk
286:talk
278:talk
270:talk
262:talk
220:the
210:ALT1
196:the
145:talk
125:more
121:for
104:page
100:talk
83:page
79:talk
68:page
64:talk
272:),
264:),
139:by
75:'s
60:"s
46:'s
40:of
398::
240::
156:(
102:)
81:)
66:)
52:.
363:(
337:(
314:(
284:(
276:(
268:(
260:(
171:)
143:(
127:)
123:(
112:.
98:(
77:(
62:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
