392:
330:
251:
188:
articles. By my count, you have five articles that have made it to the main page: one nominated by someone else, which does not count toward your initial five, and four nominated by you, which do. In addition, you have four self-nominated articles that have already been approved, three of which you owe QPQ reviews for, plus this one, which also needs a QPQ. The DYK reviewing guide is at
286:
142:
187:
Nina, once someone has nominated five of their own articles, they are required to do a quid pro quo (QPQ) review of someone else's nomination for each of their own articles they nominate. The expectation is that people participate both by submitting articles for review and by reviewing other people's
289:
The hook is confusing. My understanding on first read was that he was the father of two kings which isn't right. Clarify that
Richard Duke of York was the father (and thus that Constable was related to both kings), while staying under the 200-character limit or rework the hook to focus on one
333:
Hook has been completely changed; new review needed to cover hook and anything else not done by
Sturmvogel above. (Note to Nina: next time, please leave the original hook intact and add an ALT hook, so the discussion makes sense. Thanks!)
223:
419:
368:
103:
36:
192:, and the rules are spread out over two pages (which you may have seen already because they also tell you about what your DYK submission should have):
356:
40:
17:
269:
The original reviewer's Talk page indicates he's taking a break from
Knowledge. Any chance someone else could complete the review?
254:
QPQ done; review still needs to be completed, since "most things" means some things either weren't checked or did not check out.
290:
ancestor or the other. Third alternative is to say that he was the father of the poet. Expansion, cites and time are all good.--
395:
Article is new enough and long enough. The hook is now acceptable and the hook fact is referenced to an off-line source.
351:
98:
157:
44:
81:
295:
364:
146:
339:
259:
205:
65:
400:
360:
380:
310:
274:
231:
216:
173:
124:
291:
111:
29:
The following discussion is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below.
372:
335:
255:
201:
107:
61:
396:
197:
376:
306:
270:
227:
212:
189:
169:
120:
391:
329:
250:
413:
193:
145:
Most things check out fine, but has QPQ been done? If so, please list it here.
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as
285:
141:
47:), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page.
211:
Thanks for the explanation! I failed to notice that requirement.
168:
Sorry, I'm not familiar with QPQ. Can you tell me what it means?
349:
Thanks. As I recall, the original hook was 'Did you know that
86:
375:?'. Hope that helps to clear up the confusion.
127:). Self nom at 23:11, 27 December 2012 (UTC)
8:
49:No further edits should be made to this page
200:. If you have any questions, let us know!
420:Passed DYK nominations from December 2012
7:
305:Good point. I've reworded the hook.
24:
357:Richard of York, 3rd Duke of York
18:Template:Did you know nominations
390:
328:
284:
249:
219:) 18:36, 29 December 2012 (UTC)
208:) 04:41, 29 December 2012 (UTC)
140:
371:, executed for his part in the
234:) 21:11, 29 December 2012 (UTC)
176:) 07:11, 28 December 2012 (UTC)
106:, executed for his part in the
32:Please do not modify this page.
403:) 13:53, 12 January 2013 (UTC)
68:) 05:05, 13 January 2013 (UTC)
1:
383:) 22:46, 9 January 2013 (UTC)
342:) 21:47, 9 January 2013 (UTC)
313:) 16:53, 7 January 2013 (UTC)
298:) 02:12, 7 January 2013 (UTC)
277:) 17:57, 6 January 2013 (UTC)
262:) 03:19, 2 January 2013 (UTC)
161:04:54, 28 December 2012 (UTC)
73:Robert Constable (died 1591)
45:Knowledge talk:Did you know
37:this nomination's talk page
436:
369:Richard, Earl of Cambridge
104:Richard, Earl of Cambridge
359:, father of two Kings,
41:the article's talk page
355:was a descendant of
352:Sir Robert Constable
158:(Nonsensical Babble)
102:was a descendant of
99:Sir Robert Constable
224:Adelina Domingues
128:
427:
394:
373:Southampton Plot
332:
288:
253:
154:
144:
118:
108:Southampton Plot
60:by —
56:The result was:
34:
435:
434:
430:
429:
428:
426:
425:
424:
410:
409:
408:
147:
93:
91:
87:Article history
75:
69:
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
433:
431:
423:
422:
412:
411:
407:
406:
405:
404:
387:
386:
385:
384:
344:
343:
323:
322:
321:
320:
319:
318:
317:
316:
315:
314:
300:
299:
279:
278:
264:
263:
244:
243:
242:
241:
240:
239:
238:
237:
236:
235:
222:I've reviewed
180:
179:
178:
177:
163:
162:
137:
136:
135:
134:
116:
115:
90:
89:
84:
82:Back to T:TDYK
78:
76:
74:
71:
54:
53:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
432:
421:
418:
417:
415:
402:
398:
393:
389:
388:
382:
378:
374:
370:
366:
362:
358:
354:
353:
348:
347:
346:
345:
341:
337:
331:
327:
326:
325:
324:
312:
308:
304:
303:
302:
301:
297:
293:
292:Sturmvogel 66
287:
283:
282:
281:
280:
276:
272:
268:
267:
266:
265:
261:
257:
252:
248:
247:
246:
245:
233:
229:
225:
221:
220:
218:
214:
210:
209:
207:
203:
199:
195:
191:
186:
185:
184:
183:
182:
181:
175:
171:
167:
166:
165:
164:
160:
159:
155:
153:
150:
143:
139:
138:
133:
132:
131:
130:
129:
126:
122:
113:
109:
105:
101:
100:
95:
94:
88:
85:
83:
80:
79:
72:
70:
67:
63:
59:
52:
50:
46:
42:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
350:
156:
151:
148:
119:Created by
117:
112:King Henry V
97:
57:
55:
48:
31:
28:
365:Richard III
336:BlueMoonset
256:BlueMoonset
202:BlueMoonset
62:Crisco 1492
397:Cwmhiraeth
377:NinaGreen
367:, and of
361:Edward IV
307:NinaGreen
271:NinaGreen
228:NinaGreen
213:NinaGreen
170:NinaGreen
152:The Clown
121:NinaGreen
96:... that
414:Category
198:WP:DYKSG
110:against
58:promoted
190:WP:DYKR
149:Bonkers
194:WP:DYK
16:<
401:talk
381:talk
363:and
340:talk
311:talk
296:talk
275:talk
260:talk
232:talk
217:talk
206:talk
196:and
174:talk
125:talk
66:talk
43:or
416::
226:.
77:(
39:,
399:(
379:(
338:(
309:(
294:(
273:(
258:(
230:(
215:(
204:(
172:(
123:(
114:?
92:)
64:(
51:.
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
