527:
because someone prefers to see me expelled before working with me. And worse, the most important wikipedians agree with his request, and they are ready to sign my expulsion, rejecting any lesser punishment or even providing any explanation beyond copy-pasted generalistic ideas. There's even a second user being expelled as well just because of daring to support me in a discussion, and users I hardly even know celebrating my "defeat". Why should I stay in a web page that treats me with such disdain and contempt? I'm just staying around here for courtesy, to wait to the end of the whole thing, ask for some clarifications, and leave if I confirm that
Knowledge is the way I now understand it is; I won't move a finger to fix anything in any article anymore unless something happens to make me redefine my current opinion of this web site.
748:
554:
342:
768:
595:
439:
803:
362:
206:
598: As an Argentine, it's a pleasrue to review the article dedicated to this artist. The biography section seems to be well-sourced, but I have concerns with the the two tables summarising his work, as there are no sources suporting the entries. I can ellaborate a bit on the page. I just don't know if in doing so I can be still counted as a reviewer...--
526:
Sorry, this has nothing to do with you, but I have lost the interest in working in
Knowledge. I have been in here for 5 years, made nearly 28,000 edits, never got in problems with anyone else, provided a lot of recognized content in areas where I work basically alone... and now, I have to be expelled
209:
New enough, long enough, hook is cited and present. I'm assuming good faith on the references as my
Spanish is virtually non-existent. The only issue I see is that the award table needs a bit of reformatting, and could do with further citations for everything in it, as there's currently only one for
365:
Hooks are both very boring and it seems to me that they don't convey what's interesting about the article subject. Article needs work -- I found what appear to be some serious misinterpretations of the sources. From my reading of Google translations, this guy did not start his career in advertising
716:
Done, I have referenced all the entries of the TV list (I did not find any complete list anywhere, as with film or theater), and removed the ones I could not find. Some of those may really exist, and have no coverage in internet for being minor 1980s TV series (10 or 15 years before there was any
681:
I have updated as well the list of theater plays, again with the page in the external links (this one about theater in
Argentina). I have to find some source for the television entry; I hope I won't need to include specific references for each entry, but I will do it if I don't find alternatives.
389:
Spanish is my native language, I can understand it without translation (but I checked in the other direction, and the automatic google translation from
Spanish to English does seem a bit confusing, because of the slang and figurative speaking in the original text). He told an anecdote of initial
771:
Subsection "Theater" in section "Works" still includes unsourced entries. I suggest removing the ones not backed by a reference, leaving only the ones properly sourced. Use the text "the actor had roles in a number of theater plays, with the following ones among them..." or something like
785:
There is a reference citation at the beginning of the "Works" section that applies to everything in all three subsections of "Works", including "Theater". The individual citations within "Theater" provide more detail on the specific productions that
Carnaghi was involved with.
717:
decent internet in
Argentina). For the moment they are still available in the article in Spanish, I may need to investigate those TV series if I continue this to GAN or FAC, but for a DYK I think this should be enough. Sorry for removing the link, I did not realize it
669:
I have fixed the list of films with the ones listed in the "cine nacional" external link. It's a site hosted by the INCAA, the argentine state organization that promotes films, and I think it's reliable. I will now continue with the others.
488:
He seems like an interesting guy. I just hate for an article to suggest that he became an actor via advertising, when the sources I've read appear to indicate that he worked hard to develop his career in the traditional fashion.
405:
Well, from that interview and other sources, I got the distinct impression that he attended drama school and worked in theatre (that is, he performed as a stage actor) before he ever got involved in advertising. For example, see
236:
Also its not at all interesting as of now. Maybe you could add more to the hook on why winning this award is something special. Is it like the highest category? Because actors win awards and that's not hooky at all.
310:
Knowledge runs by consensus and 2:1 is a good enough consensus to pass the original alt also. I simply expressed by views on this less than mediocre hook. Rest you decide. You need not pay attention to us.
93:
638:
Hello. I changed my mind, so I'm back. Thanks for working in the article during this time. The tables were copied from the article in
Spanish, I will see if I can find other references for them.
557:
In honor of both
Cambalachero and Roberto Carnaghi, I've edited the article to add a brief statement about his work on the stage. My changes address the concern I had. Here's a suggested hook:
390:
rejections to work for advertisings, that he was eventually accepted, and that those small jobs in advertisings gave him the initial boost he needed to be hired for more important works.
582:
That's a bit long, but I think that the diversity of his work -- and the enormous amount of work he's done -- is a worthy topic for a hook. Needs a new reviewer. --
179:
838:
88:
442:
It's been two weeks since the above, there has been no action, and the "dubious" tag remains. I'll ping
Cambalachero; something needs to be done soon.
407:
288:
Alt is fine, though I don't see any problem with the original hook either (not every hook has to be, or even can be, written for maximum impact).
649:
Not the most appropriate place to say this, but it's good to see you around again, Cambalachero. Let's try to get this article ready for a DYK.--
36:
322:
248:
658:
I'm also pleased to see Cambalachero here. The tables are not at all complete, based on what I've read about Carnaghi's acting roles. --
607:
575:
has appeared in 44 films, had major roles in Shakespeare's plays, worked in advertising and TV comedy, and performed in telenovelas?
17:
367:
370:. Moreover, it looks like he is known for his body of work in theatre, film, and television, not solely for his work on
44:
210:
the last entry—but the running prose is fine if you want to just take the award table out until it's sourced fully.
143:
318:
244:
83:
705:). It's a shame that most of the information and the reference citation have been lost from the article... --
722:
687:
675:
643:
532:
478:
395:
282:
193:
113:
447:
350:
165:
118:
65:
40:
312:
298:
269:
238:
220:
374:' talk show. Verify the information in the article -- then we can talk about some other hooks. --
29:
The following discussion is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below.
718:
683:
671:
639:
610:
looks like a comprehensive list. However, I cannot tell whether it is an amateur webpage or a
528:
474:
391:
278:
189:
103:
812:
791:
774:
756:
710:
663:
651:
631:
619:
600:
587:
571:
494:
443:
415:
379:
346:
260:
160:
61:
273:
747:
697:
I added some very solidly sourced information about his role in the 2009 production of
553:
341:
289:
211:
832:
626:
98:
767:
594:
438:
611:
787:
752:
706:
659:
615:
583:
490:
411:
375:
802:
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as
371:
361:
265:
205:
473:
I don't care. If you don't like the article, close the nomination and go on.
123:
47:), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page.
693:
It's good to see the longer list of theatrical plays. However, in
625:
It might work. If there are doubts, we can raise the matter at
366:-- that is merely the first topic that he talks about in
694:
148:
751:
I think it's ready, but it needs a fresh reviewer. --
108:
196:). Self nominated at 18:11, 8 May 2013 (UTC)
806:In that case, everything is properly sourced.
8:
49:No further edits should be made to this page
71:
410:. I also get that from the interview. --
74:
7:
839:Passed DYK nominations from May 2013
24:
655: 21:20, 30 June 2013 (UTC)
635: 21:12, 27 June 2013 (UTC)
604: 17:30, 27 June 2013 (UTC)
18:Template:Did you know nominations
801:
766:
746:
593:
552:
437:
360:
340:
204:
816: 16:29, 5 July 2013 (UTC)
778: 15:41, 5 July 2013 (UTC)
32:Please do not modify this page.
1:
666:) 23:41, 30 June 2013 (UTC)
646:) 17:46, 30 June 2013 (UTC)
622:) 20:36, 27 June 2013 (UTC)
590:) 03:29, 26 June 2013 (UTC)
345:Needs a review. —
713:) 14:28, 2 July 2013 (UTC)
690:) 02:21, 2 July 2013 (UTC)
535:) 02:22, 20 June 2013 (UTC)
497:) 01:21, 20 June 2013 (UTC)
481:) 01:05, 20 June 2013 (UTC)
450:) 21:49, 19 June 2013 (UTC)
285:) 18:36, 10 May 2013 (UTC)
258:: ... that Argentine actor
251:} 11:58, 10 May 2013 (UTC)
45:Knowledge talk:Did you know
37:this nomination's talk page
855:
810:is fine too. Good to go.--
794:) 16:07, 5 July 2013 (UTC)
759:) 14:50, 5 July 2013 (UTC)
725:) 03:26, 4 July 2013 (UTC)
678:) 16:35, 1 July 2013 (UTC)
418:) 03:34, 4 June 2013 (UTC)
398:) 02:23, 4 June 2013 (UTC)
382:) 02:03, 2 June 2013 (UTC)
353:) 01:05, 27 May 2013 (UTC)
325:} 19:28, 11 May 2013 (UTC)
68:) 23:38, 5 July 2013 (UTC)
569:... that Argentine actor
307:18:51, 11 May 2013 (UTC)
158:... that Argentine actor
119:Find sources (notability)
94:Earwig's Copyvio Detector
229:00:44, 10 May 2013 (UTC)
41:the article's talk page
264:worked with comedians
109:A Simple Word Counter
89:Reviewer instructions
270:Guillermo Francella
114:Reviewers' template
304:
295:
226:
217:
197:
132:
131:
846:
805:
770:
750:
597:
572:Roberto Carnaghi
556:
441:
364:
344:
315:
305:
300:
296:
291:
261:Roberto Carnaghi
241:
227:
222:
218:
213:
208:
187:
161:Roberto Carnaghi
135:Roberto Carnaghi
72:
56:The result was:
34:
854:
853:
849:
848:
847:
845:
844:
843:
829:
828:
827:
612:reliable source
313:
299:
290:
274:Antonio Gasalla
239:
221:
212:
155:
153:
149:Article history
137:
128:
104:Character count
69:
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
852:
850:
842:
841:
831:
830:
826:
825:
824:
823:
822:
821:
820:
819:
818:
817:
796:
795:
780:
779:
761:
760:
743:
742:
741:
740:
739:
738:
737:
736:
735:
734:
733:
732:
731:
730:
729:
728:
727:
726:
679:
580:
579:
578:
577:
576:
559:
558:
549:
548:
547:
546:
545:
544:
543:
542:
541:
540:
539:
538:
537:
536:
511:
510:
509:
508:
507:
506:
505:
504:
503:
502:
501:
500:
499:
498:
483:
482:
460:
459:
458:
457:
456:
455:
454:
453:
452:
451:
426:
425:
424:
423:
422:
421:
420:
419:
400:
399:
384:
383:
368:this interview
355:
354:
337:
336:
335:
334:
333:
332:
331:
330:
329:
328:
327:
326:
314:Dharmadhyaksha
240:Dharmadhyaksha
231:
230:
185:
184:
183:
182:
170:
169:
166:Gold ACE Award
152:
151:
146:
144:Back to T:TDYK
140:
138:
136:
133:
130:
129:
127:
126:
121:
116:
111:
106:
101:
96:
91:
86:
80:
77:
76:
54:
53:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
851:
840:
837:
836:
834:
815:
814:
809:
804:
800:
799:
798:
797:
793:
789:
784:
783:
782:
781:
777:
776:
769:
765:
764:
763:
762:
758:
754:
749:
745:
744:
724:
720:
715:
714:
712:
708:
704:
700:
696:
692:
691:
689:
685:
680:
677:
673:
668:
667:
665:
661:
657:
656:
654:
653:
648:
647:
645:
641:
637:
636:
634:
633:
628:
624:
623:
621:
617:
613:
609:
606:
605:
603:
602:
596:
592:
591:
589:
585:
581:
574:
573:
568:
565:
564:
563:
562:
561:
560:
555:
551:
550:
534:
530:
525:
524:
523:
522:
521:
520:
519:
518:
517:
516:
515:
514:
513:
512:
496:
492:
487:
486:
485:
484:
480:
476:
472:
471:
470:
469:
468:
467:
466:
465:
464:
463:
462:
461:
449:
445:
440:
436:
435:
434:
433:
432:
431:
430:
429:
428:
427:
417:
413:
409:
404:
403:
402:
401:
397:
393:
388:
387:
386:
385:
381:
377:
373:
369:
363:
359:
358:
357:
356:
352:
348:
343:
339:
338:
324:
320:
316:
309:
308:
306:
303:
297:
294:
287:
286:
284:
280:
277:
275:
271:
267:
263:
262:
257:
253:
252:
250:
246:
242:
235:
234:
233:
232:
228:
225:
219:
216:
207:
203:
202:
201:
200:
199:
195:
191:
181:
180:Buenos Amigos
177:
174:
173:
172:
171:
167:
164:received the
163:
162:
157:
156:
150:
147:
145:
142:
141:
134:
125:
122:
120:
117:
115:
112:
110:
107:
105:
102:
100:
97:
95:
92:
90:
87:
85:
82:
81:
79:
78:
73:
70:
67:
63:
59:
52:
50:
46:
42:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
811:
807:
773:
719:Cambalachero
702:
698:
684:Cambalachero
672:Cambalachero
650:
640:Cambalachero
630:
599:
570:
566:
529:Cambalachero
475:Cambalachero
392:Cambalachero
301:
292:
279:Cambalachero
259:
255:
254:
223:
214:
190:Cambalachero
186:
175:
159:
57:
55:
48:
31:
28:
813:Jetstreamer
775:Jetstreamer
652:Jetstreamer
632:Jetstreamer
608:This source
601:Jetstreamer
444:BlueMoonset
347:Crisco 1492
188:Created by
124:Hook length
75:DYK toolbox
62:BlueMoonset
372:Tato Bores
266:Tato Bores
703:King Lear
695:this edit
408:this page
99:QPQ check
84:DYK check
833:Category
699:Rey Lear
176:Reviewed
168:in 2006?
58:promoted
772:this.--
293:GRAPPLE
215:GRAPPLE
788:Orlady
753:Orlady
707:Orlady
660:Orlady
627:WP:RSN
616:Orlady
584:Orlady
491:Orlady
412:Orlady
376:Orlady
567:ALT2:
16:<
808:ALT2
792:talk
757:talk
723:talk
711:talk
688:talk
676:talk
664:talk
644:talk
620:talk
614:. --
588:talk
533:talk
495:talk
479:talk
448:talk
416:talk
396:talk
380:talk
351:talk
317:§§ {
283:talk
272:and
256:ALT1
243:§§ {
194:talk
66:talk
629:.--
60:by
43:or
835::
786:--
489:--
311:§§
268:,
237:§§
198:.
178::
139:(
39:,
790:(
755:(
721:(
709:(
701:(
686:(
674:(
662:(
642:(
618:(
586:(
531:(
493:(
477:(
446:(
414:(
394:(
378:(
349:(
323:C
321:/
319:T
302:X
281:(
276:?
249:C
247:/
245:T
224:X
192:(
154:)
64:(
51:.
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
