405:
ineligible). What you did about these observations needed to be up to you because you know the sources and also what you have looked for and been unable to find. I most definitely did not say everything must be done to pass DYK. I did not say that GA standards applies. However, remember that the purpose of the DYK criteria is to ensure quality articles on the main page, so 1501 characters may be technically compliant but it does not mean that it is sufficient to be non-stubby or main page-worthy.The approach you have taken in calling for another reviewer is unacceptable to me because it suggests the submitter can decide that a reviewer / review is unacceptable. If you want to argue a reviewer should be replaced, go to WT:DYK and make an argument for bias or incompetence or whatever, or talk to the reviewer, but I do not accept a submitter has a unilateral right to "fire" a reviewer, so to speak. You can withdraw a submission, but while it is a submission, no submitter can get rid of whoever chooses to review without very good reason. I have had reviewers I disagreed with, and even ones I have found difficult to work with. I have certainly had cases where being able to say to a reviewer "I'm right, you're wrong, go away" might have been both emotionally satisfying and efficient for finding someone more likely to see my perspective, but doing so would lead to fundamentally undermining quality assurance - and DYK has enough issues with this as it is. Your recent thread at WT:DYK left me tempted to have this discussion there, but I am trying to stay collegial and treat your above post as some misunderstand + perhaps a bad day for each of us.I will make some specific
1026:
storm off but because in editing the article substantively I ceased to be a neutral editor and thus became unable to give a final position on the hook. If you had taken up those parts of my suggestions you now find acceptable, we would be in a different situation. I am glad that you now recognise those changes as both justifiable and positive, as I have accepted that nothing in the material you see as contentious is important enough to fight over. Better sources may become available in time, but until then I see why you see the source as weak and have chosen to allow your position to prevail. Were I reviewing, my only issue would be whether the hook is uninteresting, but that is now for some other editor to consider. On your behaviour, however, it was not about editorial decisions but about not acting in line with AGF, repeatedly misrepresenting my suggestions as demands, and statements like "good luck or whatever." You have been sanctioned before, it is inevitable that you will be under scrutiny - whether that is fair or not, it is a fact. Acting moderately and prudently would be the wiser course, and I hope you can reflect on this. No one is perfect, I agree, but perhaps the grace and thoughtfulness you advocate for me might also be beneficial closer to home?
334:
makes it clear there were clashes when Scott brought methodical and modern administrative approaches to management. I note also (from Forbes) that his sister is also a billionaire and they run the company together, which suggests only mentioning her as the ex-wife of a
Governor is poor. (It reads to me like she wouldn't be mentioned were her ex- not famous, rather than that she has achieved in her own right and also happened to be married to someone famous.) Maybe something like that they share the duties of running the company which has made both billionaires, and that she was once married to the Governor. Just some thoughts, I've yet to re-do the review in light of the additions.
350:
technology work that benefits humanity" just don't have any place in an encyclopedia article, IMO. I don't even know what that means. It's marketing mumbo-jumbo. As for "supporting the
Salvation Army" - that is also too vague to include in an encylcopedia article. Did he donate an old shirt or did he write a check for ten million dollars? Who knows? I've searched separately for detail and could find nothing. Finally, the DYK criteria do not require a review for an article's thoroughness, I think you may have confused the DYK standards with the GAN standards. Thanks for the review but I think we may need a second one here.
966:
LavaBaron's behaviour on this page has been poor, but that is no reason to refuse to promote. The source which he dislikes has not been used additionally from his uses except for the statement of the citation with the award of the honorary doctorate. LavaBaron clearly believes he knows truth about this case, and may be right, though his application of policy is selective and his objectivity is consequently a concern. I know very little about this topic beyond what I read in sources, and I suggest that the new reviewer also look to sources over LavaBaron's assertions of inside knowledge
288:
writing a check or taking an honorary chairmanship nor has he purchased naming rights for himself on anything, his only hobby is purportedly collecting rocks but there's no RS that unambiguously says this. I wish I could pepper the article with anecdotes about how he owns a NBA team or enjoys freestyle rock climbing or has a car made out of solid gold, but there's nothing there. The only thing he's notable for is his money and the only interesting fact about him is that he has more of it than anyone else in Idaho.
263:, I know you have just returned, but even if the hook was interesting, this article doesn't belong on the main page in it's current state. It is well referenced, maybe there is additional content in those references? Maybe his work on other boards is of note? Is he engaged in philanthropic work? He's run the company for 15 years, anything to say about achievements? A DYK doesn't have to be approaching GA, but it does have to be past stub. Flesh this out and it can pass.
962:
376:
256:
1342:
968:(as an aside, I have IRL knowledge of this subject that makes the intensely ] statements from the press release you are demanding I source even more ludicrous; we should stick to ] to protect the project from the public ridicule that I guarantee you will follow if this type of language is inserted sourced to the UI donor press release you've latched onto).
228:." The direct quote in the first sentence of the "personal life" section should be immediately followed by a reference, and could also be shortened, such as "Simplot's personality has been described as markedly different from his gregarious father, with Bloomberg writing that he is "unassuming, with a thoughtful, almost professorial air"." becoming "
1314:
means we don't remove things purely because they might cause offence, it doesn't mean we have to go out of our way to be offensive, and laughing at other peoples' names is a fairly low blow. (Personally, I'd say the lesson from this is "not every article ought to be included in DYK, since some topics
918:
to the article which should be uncontroversial. The only one using the "ui" reference is stating what the doctorate was for. I have also looked at the series of recent edits you have made to this template and state again that I have not demanded you do anything, but made suggestions. I highlighted
223:
Article is new enough, but not long enough (1423 characters at present) and with tighter writing it would be shorter. For example, J.R. Simplot or J.R. Simplot
Company occurs four times in the first four sentences, with another J.R. in the next sentence. A sentence like "Simplot is the youngest son
1006:
and embrace a more open-minded, less defensive, view to future GF attempts by other editors to gently educate you about its purpose, reason and mandates. None of us are perfect, me included, and there's no shame in needing help from other editors from time to time; the only shame is not accepting it
965:
To the new reviewer: The article is now sufficiently long to qualify for DYK, and I am of the view that my additions remove the possibility of it being considered a stub. The hook is dull, but cited in the article, and it is now compliant with DYK rules in all aspects which I have checked. I think
287:
Unfortunately, there is nothing more interesting about Scott
Simplot. In the last 30 years he's donated $ 750 to two political campaigns and only made a single endorsement (in a Boise city council election), he's donated money to a variety of charitable causes but never been directly involved beyond
333:
His
Doctorate is likely partly from funnelling cash into the University, but you could cite the reason and use the above to support each area. There is certainly enough to support an article, and what you add is up to you. I for one am interested in his science-based approach, and the Wharton ref
923:
are sadly poor at present, and frankly if you continue as you are you are going to get sanctioned again, in my opinion. Having now made changes to the article (since you would not have a rational discussion), I will leave it to someone else to judge this nomination. I urge you to reflect on your
495:
He collaborates with his sister, Gay, in running the family-owned business. Under
Simplot's leadership, the company has established an ongoing research unit which collaborates with the University of Idaho to address agricultural challenges through science, and he funded supporting construction of
234:
described him as being "unassuming, with a thoughtful, almost professorial air," a marked contrast to his gregarious father." Usually I wouldn't comment much on copyediting but with the current content I would shorten it, and it would be further from 1500 characters. Also, is there anything more
1309:
I'd call ALT2 far too boring; unless they each raised themselves from poverty independently to become wealthy, it's effectively saying "rich people tend to have rich families" which I imagine the readers already know. I (possibly for the first time in history) agree with LavaBaron that ALT1 isn't
1025:
what I added was what I suggested to you above - same sources and all - but skipping the changes based on the allegedly promotional source, which you unfortunately focussed on so much that you did not recognise or address the suggestions arising from other sources. I withdrew from the DYK not to
349:
I don't believe these platitudes are appropriate for an encyclopedia article. While this may be hosted on a university website it is essentially a recognition press release for a major donor and vague statements like "continual learning and problem solving through the application of science and
404:
at what I have said, I have offered thoughts and suggestions for you to consider and mandated very little. I said the length was unacceptable because it is not DYK-compliant. I said about copyediting as it would shorten the article when length is an issue, and leave it arguably a stub (an
1236:- Please remove me from being credited with this DYK if this vile Alt1 proposal that uses LGBT self-identity labels as diminutives is approved. I have no interest in my nomination being used to marginalize the gay/lesbian community by framing them as the butt of a joke.
938:- thanks, your edits look fine to me. I'm glad I challenged you to improve the sourcing and composition in your first two suggestions (and I'm glad you rose to the challenge!); your third version seems perfectly acceptable and a net improvement to the article. Good job.
544:
described him as being "unassuming, with a thoughtful, almost professorial air," a marked contrast to his gregarious father, which was reflected in their different management styles with J.R. acting on hunches and Scott preferring detailed analysis of potential business
888:
I, however, will not make these edits regardless of how many times you demand it nor how much red highlighting you use. As I have repeatedly told you, I do not believe that, what is essentially a press release, is an appropriate source for layering platitudes and
314:
Simplot's leadership of the company has including establishing a research unit and is based in a philosophy of "continual learning and problem solving through the application of science and technology" guided by a commitment to "work that benefits
893:
as fact-statements into a WP article (e.g. "to address agricultural challenges through science" or your previous, even more outrageous, suggestion of " guided by a commitment to work that benefits humanity").
318:
This research has included building collaborations with the
University of Idaho to address agricultural challenges through science, and he has "personally sponsored a number of ground-breaking research
465:
in 1973, following his graduation from
Wharton. He was quickly promoted to more senior positions and became chairman of the board of directors in 2001 after he reportedly "pushed out" his father, J.R.
322:
Philanthropy includes supporting construction of the
University's biotechnology lab, support of the Salvation Army, and chairing the expansion of the Idaho Food Bank, thereby alleviating hunger.
400:
I have considered how to respond to you because I believe you have misunderstood my intent, and also taken an approach which I find fundamentally unacceptable. On the first point, if you look
113:
840:
199:
1150:
At first I meant ALT1 just as a joke, but now that people are taking it seriously, I figure -- why not? (Something like Donald Trump's presidential bid, I guess.) And compared to
325:
His
Honorary Doctorate is in Administrative Science in recognition of "lifelong achievement, public service, and significant contributions to the state of Idaho and the nation."
1388:
1174:
I don't know if it will be seen as acceptable, but I like the cleverness of it, and the original proposal is dull IMO. I can't tick, though, so see what others think.
423:
Simplot is the youngest son of J.R. Simplot, the founder of the diversified agriculture company J.R. Simplot Company, and his first wife Rudy Rosevear. He received a
328:
Contributions to the state extend beyond the Simplon company, including as a founding member of the board of Idaho's largest private employer (Micron Technology).
1322:
Yes, plenty of folks would see wealth per se, as a reason for notability, to be quite offensive. There must be something interesting in that article, surely(?)
885:, is that you should feel free to make those edits if you feel strongly about them. Knowledge is edited by people like you and me, not by some mysterious force.
415:, since you are seeing my comments (which were meant to go to issues, rather than specific text) as unencyclopaedic, and as I take your point in several cases:
224:
of J.R. Simplot, the founder of the J.R. Simplot Company, a diversified agriculture company." could be "Simplot's father founded the diversified agribusiness
779:
108:
1155:
811:
1059:
1108:
461:
Simplot first obtained a seat on the J.R. Simplot Company board of directors in 1970 and was hired as the company's director of planning and
649:
987:
However, you do your efforts a disservice by choosing to exit by storming off with a final shot across my bow. DYK review is not the place.
36:
510:
In addition to his seat on the J.R. Simplot Company board, he also serves on the boards of directors of nearly a dozen other companies
432:
608:
17:
1151:
1002:
to a WP article is indicative of my "behaviour" it's an indication I'm proud to accept. I'd advise you take a moment to review
984:- you accepted my challenge to improve your sourcing and composition and were able to positively improve the article. Good job!
581:
in recognition of "lifelong achievement, public service, and significant contributions to the state of Idaho and the nation."
1315:
can be entirely worthwhile to those who already care but totally uninteresting to general readers".) ‑
284:
I think the company's full name has to be written in each instance to avoid confusion with the subject of the article.
44:
919:
in red so you could see the changes easily. What I have added are edits based on the other sources. Your skills at
484:
He served on the Micron board from its inception, and by 2004 the company was the largest private employer in Idaho.
1249:
440:
163:
1327:
1303:
1265:
1220:
1116:
103:
1122:
462:
133:
1311:
991:
685:
304:
138:
998:(what you declare as "the source he dislikes") after you demanded they be inserted. If refusing to add
1104:
235:
interesting about him than his wealth? I'm not sure this is more than a stub, at present we learn:
1323:
1299:
1261:
1241:
1216:
1112:
1084:
1046:
1012:
943:
901:
784:
723:
693:
428:
424:
384:
355:
293:
213:
1209:
1187:
1352:
573:
40:
746:
241:
Two degrees + an honorary doctorate (tis last point could provide more content for the article)
1368:
1310:
appropriate, as it has the potential to offend a lot of people for very little benefit; while
999:
890:
751:
552:
479:
123:
82:
65:
718:
1179:
1140:
1031:
974:
929:
875:
339:
268:
478:
During his time at the company, Simplot engineered the lucrative early-stage investment in
1316:
1295:
489:
924:
behaviour and comments because I believe they are going to cause you ongoing problems.
1237:
1197:
1165:
1094:
1042:
1020:
1008:
961:
939:
909:
897:
845:
616:
540:
436:
395:
380:
375:
351:
289:
260:
230:
209:
1382:
1348:
1279:
1074:
920:
180:
118:
1121:
But surprised to see you here, EEng. Thought you'd be still out on the streets with
520:
named him the wealthiest man in Idaho, with an estimated net worth of $ 2.1 billion.
255:
29:
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below.
1364:
1003:
78:
61:
1341:
686:"Outstanding Alumni: Scott R. Simplot Honorary Doctor of Administrative Sciences"
1288:
1257:
1175:
1136:
1038:
1027:
981:
970:
935:
925:
882:
871:
556:
335:
275:
264:
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as
1213:
780:"From Mr. Spud to Mr. Chips;The Potato Tycoon Who Is the Force Behind Micron"
1253:
1192:
1160:
1132:
1089:
303:
LavaBaron, I do not agree that there is nothing more than can be said. The
238:
He's rich, now running the company his father founded, and on several boards
143:
259:
This needs work if it is going to make it under the DYK criteria. Sorry,
1007:
with grace and thoughtfulness. Best of luck with your future endeavors.
225:
654:
516:
47:), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page.
1131:
I like the idea of ALT1, it'd be good in the quirky slot. Clever,
812:"He Put The 'Business' Into Argribusiness: Scott R. Simplot, WG'73"
1284:
547:
He is divorced and has two daughters. His sister, Gay Simplot, is
185:
486:
He is also responsible for the company's 2003 purchase of
247:
Divorced, 2 kids, sister divorced from Governor of Idaho
1360:
967:
915:
168:
74:
747:"J.R. Simplot keeps potato business all in the family"
200:
Template:Did you know nominations/Proceratium petrosum
482:, which grew to 22-percent of that company by 1996.
128:
244:
thoughtful and unassuming, unlike gregarious father
216:). Self-nominated at 08:20, 1 November 2016 (UTC).
1062:are really paying off for Lava Baron. How about
512:and chaired the expansion of the Idaho Food Bank
834:
832:
278:, its now expanded to be over 1500 characters.
8:
1078:has a Gay sister who was married to a Butch?
49:No further edits should be made to this page
650:"The Richest Person In Every Western State"
603:
601:
599:
91:
1389:Failed DYK nominations from November 2016
806:
804:
802:
643:
641:
639:
637:
635:
633:
778:Zuckerman, Lawrence (8 February 1996).
595:
94:
1252:EEng, you heartless vile bigot. Just
841:"The Man Behind the Cloning Movement"
773:
771:
769:
712:
710:
7:
680:
678:
676:
674:
672:
990:I told you, twice, I would not add
496:the University's biotechnology lab.
745:Anders, George (1 November 2016).
433:Masters in Business Administration
24:
1156:Dr. Young's Ideal Rectal Dilators
307:reference supports the following:
18:Template:Did you know nominations
1355:) 12:02, 12 November 2016 (UTC)
1340:
1268:) 09:51, 12 November 2016 (UTC)
1186:If you've stopped ticking, page
1182:) 20:01, 11 November 2016 (UTC)
1119:) 12:15, 11 November 2016 (UTC)
960:
374:
254:
1330:) 11:14, 12 November 2016 (UTC)
1306:) 10:10, 12 November 2016 (UTC)
1244:) 07:37, 12 November 2016 (UTC)
1223:) 20:38, 11 November 2016 (UTC)
1143:) 17:31, 11 November 2016 (UTC)
1107:from this one. But if anything
1034:) 19:53, 7 November 2016 (UTC)
1015:) 16:28, 6 November 2016 (UTC)
977:) 11:51, 6 November 2016 (UTC)
932:) 11:51, 6 November 2016 (UTC)
904:) 06:31, 6 November 2016 (UTC)
878:) 06:18, 6 November 2016 (UTC)
839:Gogoi, Pallavi (7 March 2007).
387:) 15:51, 2 November 2016 (UTC)
271:) 15:50, 1 November 2016 (UTC)
68:) 13:22, 12 November 2016 (UTC)
32:Please do not modify this page.
1319:10:53, 12 November 2016 (UTC)
1171:18:25, 11 November 2016 (UTC)
1100:10:41, 11 November 2016 (UTC)
1049:) 20:19, 7 November 2016 (UTC)
946:) 16:28, 6 November 2016 (UTC)
431:in 1968 and went on to earn a
358:) 15:51, 2 November 2016 (UTC)
342:) 12:57, 2 November 2016 (UTC)
296:) 18:02, 1 November 2016 (UTC)
1:
1361:nominator LavaBaron's request
1345:Nominator wants to withdraw.
1287:, has a sister who is also a
1208:But who wrote it? Was it the
1203:20:18, 11 November 2016 (UTC)
579:from the University of Idaho
75:nominator LavaBaron's request
572:In 2004 Simplot received an
648:Sola, Katie (25 May 2016).
45:Knowledge talk:Did you know
37:this nomination's talk page
1405:
1374:22, 12 November 2016 (UTC)
441:University of Pennsylvania
88:22, 12 November 2016 (UTC)
577:in Administrative Science
551:and is divorced from the
281:To your other questions:
184:is the wealthiest man in
139:Find sources (notability)
114:Earwig's Copyvio Detector
1283:, the wealthiest man in
1256:. And we don't want any
419:Early life and education
1152:the missionary position
896:Good luck or whatever.
41:the article's talk page
488:the Australian arm of
463:information technology
1111:, I'll let you know.
1060:Dale Carnegie courses
870:Thoughts, LavaBaron?
427:in Business from the
129:A Simple Word Counter
109:Reviewer instructions
1294:... or is this just
379:new reviewer needed
785:Wall Street Journal
724:Des Moines Register
694:University of Idaho
429:University of Idaho
425:Bachelor of Science
134:Reviewers' template
994:statements from a
609:"Scott R. Simplot"
574:honorary doctorate
549:also a billionaire
305:Outstanding Alumni
1269:
1224:
1204:
1126:
752:Salt Lake Tribune
553:Governor of Idaho
480:Micron Technology
217:
152:
151:
1396:
1344:
1247:
1207:
1200:
1195:
1185:
1168:
1163:
1158:, this is tame.
1120:
1097:
1092:
1024:
964:
913:
858:
857:
855:
853:
836:
827:
826:
824:
822:
816:Wharton Magazine
808:
797:
796:
794:
792:
775:
764:
763:
761:
759:
742:
736:
735:
733:
731:
714:
705:
704:
702:
700:
682:
667:
666:
664:
662:
645:
628:
627:
625:
623:
605:
582:
578:
550:
546:
513:
497:
493:
485:
414:
409:
399:
378:
258:
207:
92:
56:The result was:
34:
1404:
1403:
1399:
1398:
1397:
1395:
1394:
1393:
1379:
1378:
1377:
1198:
1193:
1166:
1161:
1109:springs to mind
1095:
1090:
1018:
907:
863:
862:
861:
851:
849:
838:
837:
830:
820:
818:
810:
809:
800:
790:
788:
777:
776:
767:
757:
755:
744:
743:
739:
729:
727:
716:
715:
708:
698:
696:
684:
683:
670:
660:
658:
647:
646:
631:
621:
619:
607:
606:
597:
580:
576:
548:
538:
511:
494:
490:John West Foods
487:
483:
435:(MBA) from the
412:
407:
393:
175:
173:
169:Article history
157:
148:
124:Character count
69:
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
1402:
1400:
1392:
1391:
1381:
1380:
1376:
1375:
1372:
1359:Withdrawn per
1338:
1337:
1336:
1335:
1334:
1333:
1332:
1331:
1324:Martinevans123
1312:WP:NOTCENSORED
1307:
1300:Martinevans123
1272:
1271:
1270:
1262:Martinevans123
1245:
1231:
1230:
1229:
1228:
1227:
1226:
1225:
1217:Martinevans123
1145:
1144:
1128:
1127:
1113:Martinevans123
1103:I may have to
1085:Martinevans123
1081:
1080:
1079:
1064:
1063:
1055:
1054:
1053:
1052:
1051:
1050:
1037:Great, thanks
992:WP:PROMOTIONAL
988:
985:
958:
957:
956:
955:
954:
953:
952:
951:
950:
949:
948:
947:
894:
886:
860:
859:
846:Bloomberg News
828:
798:
765:
737:
719:"J.R. Simplot"
717:Longden, Tom.
706:
668:
629:
594:
593:
589:
588:
587:
586:
585:
584:
583:
565:
564:
563:
562:
561:
560:
536:
526:
525:
524:
523:
522:
521:
503:
502:
501:
500:
499:
498:
471:
470:
469:
468:
467:
466:
459:
449:
448:
447:
446:
445:
444:
437:Wharton School
421:
411:(additions in
372:
371:
370:
369:
368:
367:
366:
365:
364:
363:
362:
361:
360:
359:
344:
343:
330:
329:
326:
323:
320:
316:
309:
308:
298:
297:
285:
279:
251:
250:
249:
248:
245:
242:
239:
205:
204:
203:
202:
190:
189:
172:
171:
166:
164:Back to T:TDYK
160:
158:
156:
153:
150:
149:
147:
146:
141:
136:
131:
126:
121:
116:
111:
106:
100:
97:
96:
90:
89:
86:
73:Withdrawn per
54:
53:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
1401:
1390:
1387:
1386:
1384:
1373:
1370:
1366:
1362:
1358:
1357:
1356:
1354:
1350:
1346:
1343:
1329:
1325:
1321:
1320:
1318:
1313:
1308:
1305:
1301:
1297:
1293:
1292:
1290:
1286:
1282:
1281:
1280:Scott Simplot
1276:
1273:
1267:
1263:
1259:
1255:
1251:
1246:
1243:
1239:
1235:
1232:
1222:
1218:
1214:
1211:
1206:
1205:
1202:
1201:
1196:
1189:
1184:
1183:
1181:
1177:
1173:
1172:
1170:
1169:
1164:
1157:
1153:
1149:
1148:
1147:
1146:
1142:
1138:
1134:
1130:
1129:
1124:
1118:
1114:
1110:
1106:
1102:
1101:
1099:
1098:
1093:
1086:
1082:
1077:
1076:
1075:Scott Simplot
1071:
1068:
1067:
1066:
1065:
1061:
1057:
1056:
1048:
1044:
1040:
1036:
1035:
1033:
1029:
1022:
1017:
1016:
1014:
1010:
1005:
1001:
997:
996:press release
993:
989:
986:
983:
980:
979:
978:
976:
972:
969:
963:
945:
941:
937:
934:
933:
931:
927:
922:
917:
911:
906:
905:
903:
899:
895:
892:
887:
884:
880:
879:
877:
873:
869:
868:
867:
866:
865:
864:
848:
847:
842:
835:
833:
829:
817:
813:
807:
805:
803:
799:
787:
786:
781:
774:
772:
770:
766:
754:
753:
748:
741:
738:
726:
725:
720:
713:
711:
707:
695:
691:
687:
681:
679:
677:
675:
673:
669:
657:
656:
651:
644:
642:
640:
638:
636:
634:
630:
618:
614:
613:bloomberg.com
610:
604:
602:
600:
596:
592:
575:
571:
570:
569:
568:
567:
566:
558:
554:
543:
542:
537:
535:
534:Personal life
532:
531:
530:
529:
528:
527:
519:
518:
509:
508:
507:
506:
505:
504:
491:
481:
477:
476:
475:
474:
473:
472:
464:
460:
458:
455:
454:
453:
452:
451:
450:
442:
438:
434:
430:
426:
422:
420:
417:
416:
410:
403:
397:
392:
391:
390:
389:
388:
386:
382:
377:
357:
353:
348:
347:
346:
345:
341:
337:
332:
331:
327:
324:
321:
317:
313:
312:
311:
310:
306:
302:
301:
300:
299:
295:
291:
286:
283:
282:
280:
277:
273:
272:
270:
266:
262:
257:
253:
252:
246:
243:
240:
237:
236:
233:
232:
227:
222:
221:
220:
219:
218:
215:
211:
201:
197:
194:
193:
192:
191:
187:
183:
182:
181:Scott Simplot
177:
176:
170:
167:
165:
162:
161:
155:Scott Simplot
154:
145:
142:
140:
137:
135:
132:
130:
127:
125:
122:
120:
117:
115:
112:
110:
107:
105:
102:
101:
99:
98:
93:
87:
84:
80:
76:
72:
71:
70:
67:
63:
59:
52:
50:
46:
42:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
1339:
1278:
1274:
1233:
1210:Raunch Hands
1191:
1159:
1088:
1073:
1069:
1058:I see those
995:
959:
916:some changes
914:I have made
881:My thought,
850:. Retrieved
844:
819:. Retrieved
815:
789:. Retrieved
783:
756:. Retrieved
750:
740:
728:. Retrieved
722:
697:. Retrieved
689:
659:. Retrieved
653:
620:. Retrieved
612:
590:
539:
533:
515:
456:
418:
406:
401:
373:
229:
206:
195:
179:
57:
55:
48:
31:
28:
1296:too tabloid
1289:billionaire
1250:not so fast
1123:your banner
557:Butch Otter
514:. In 2016,
408:suggestions
208:Created by
144:Hook length
95:DYK toolbox
1317:Iridescent
1260:, either.
1258:butt jokes
1254:cut it out
1000:WP:PUFFERY
891:WP:PUFFERY
852:31 October
821:1 November
791:31 October
758:31 October
730:1 November
699:1 November
690:uidaho.edu
661:31 October
622:1 November
591:References
319:projects."
315:humanity."
1277:... that
1238:LavaBaron
1188:Dr. Freud
1105:hide away
1072:... that
1043:LavaBaron
1021:LavaBaron
1009:LavaBaron
940:LavaBaron
910:LavaBaron
898:LavaBaron
617:Bloomberg
541:Bloomberg
402:carefully
396:LavaBaron
381:LavaBaron
352:LavaBaron
290:LavaBaron
261:LavaBaron
231:Bloomberg
210:LavaBaron
178:... that
119:QPQ check
104:DYK check
1383:Category
1365:— Maile
1349:Cowlibob
545:actions.
443:in 1973.
274:Thanks,
196:Reviewed
79:— Maile
62:— Maile
58:rejected
1083:Paging
439:at the
226:Simplot
1234:Closer
1176:EdChem
1137:EdChem
1039:EdChem
1028:EdChem
982:EdChem
971:EdChem
936:EdChem
926:EdChem
883:EdChem
872:EdChem
655:Forbes
517:Forbes
457:Career
336:EdChem
276:EdChem
265:EdChem
1285:Idaho
1248:Yes,
1004:WP:RS
186:Idaho
16:<
1371:) 13
1369:talk
1353:talk
1328:talk
1304:talk
1275:ALT2
1266:talk
1242:talk
1221:talk
1180:talk
1154:and
1141:talk
1133:EEng
1117:talk
1070:ALT1
1047:talk
1032:talk
1013:talk
975:talk
944:talk
930:talk
902:talk
876:talk
854:2016
823:2016
793:2016
760:2016
732:2016
701:2016
663:2016
624:2016
385:talk
356:talk
340:talk
294:talk
269:talk
214:talk
85:) 13
83:talk
66:talk
1215:??
1199:Eng
1167:Eng
1135:.
1096:Eng
921:AGF
413:red
60:by
43:or
1385::
1363:.
1347:]
1298:?
1291:?
1212:?
1190:.
1125:.!
1087:.
1041:!
843:.
831:^
814:.
801:^
782:.
768:^
749:.
721:.
709:^
692:.
688:.
671:^
652:.
632:^
615:.
611:.
598:^
555:,
198::
159:(
77:.
39:,
1367:(
1351:(
1326:(
1302:(
1264:(
1240:(
1219:(
1194:E
1178:(
1162:E
1139:(
1115:(
1091:E
1045:(
1030:(
1023::
1019:@
1011:(
973:(
942:(
928:(
912::
908:@
900:(
874:(
856:.
825:.
795:.
762:.
734:.
703:.
665:.
626:.
559:.
492:.
398::
394:@
383:(
354:(
338:(
292:(
267:(
212:(
188:?
174:)
81:(
64:(
51:.
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
