96:
198:
221:
275:, that had no page numbers in the refs and it made DYK just fine. I wish I had time to figure out how to rework the format for inline page citations and go back through all the refs, but I really don't. Now very few people will see this article because of your arbitrary enforcement of a nonexistent rule/policy. In the future I'll put page numbers in; I think it's useful, but it shouldn't make or break a DYK.
417:
271:
occurrences almost as fast as you can if I were to include page numbers. Not verifiable = no refs. I guess it's been too long for this to be a DYK now, but I feel it's rather a shame because it's a good article that I put a lot of time into. I did another one (that I put less work into) around the same time,
270:
I personally feel it's very nitpicky and arbitrary to have this requirement. It is absolutely verifiable as is. Get the books and look in the index. How is that not verifiable? It might take three minutes more to verify, but saying it's not verifiable is absolute nonsense. You can find all of these
321:
Without page numbers, there's no way to verify the statements. Not all books have indicies, and not all indicies list everything that we want them to inclunde, so we can't assume that a book actually contains the information that you say it does if you don't include the page numbers. For future
236:
This is typically not a requirement. I've probably had 20 DYKs and never done this. It's also not a requirement in many peer-reviewed publications. It wouldn't be a bad idea though, although I've never done it and don't know how.
332:: I use it all the time, as it allows me to cite different page numbers in the same publication without clogging up the references section with multiple citations to the same source.
131:
442:
95:
251:
You don't know how to put page numbers in? It is a requirement that the hook fact be verifiable, and without a page number it isn't.
36:
17:
44:
374:
Two of the sources now have page references. Much of the article is verifiable from the
Ferguson book, pages 57-61. --
79:
289:
Whether you agree or not, page numbers are standard. And why is this back in the noms page after 3 weeks anyway?
110:
307:
201:
5x expansion verified. Age, length OK. Offline refs AGF. "Over" works better in the hook. Good to go.
362:
298:
256:
229:
403:
281:
243:
184:
145:
163:"gradual" enlightenment" is tautological. Consider changing "vs." to "and", or "over", or "or".
29:
The following discussion is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below.
337:
206:
425:
379:
315:
354:
290:
272:
252:
225:
399:
277:
239:
180:
168:
141:
197:
436:
109:(670–762 CE) initiated the conflict between those advocating "sudden" over "gradual"
220:
333:
202:
40:
421:
391:
375:
326:
311:
62:
416:
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as
164:
306:
For the answer to the question of why this is on the noms page again, see
117:
105:
47:), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page.
353:
So it got restored and we found the same problem. Big surprise.
224:
Citations are missing page numbers required for verification.
114:
84:
308:
WT:DYK#Template:Did you know nominations/Johnny Basham
155:
Without reviewing the hook, I want to suggest that "
387:Page numbers have been added throughout using
148:). Self nom at 05:15, 10 December 2011 (UTC)
8:
49:No further edits should be made to this page
443:Passed DYK nominations from December 2011
7:
397:. Thanks for the suggestion :-)
66: 17:24, 27 January 2012 (UTC)
24:
45:Knowledge (XXG) talk:Did you know
18:Template:Did you know nominations
415:
232:) 01:53, 26 December 2011 (UTC)
219:
196:
94:
318:) 20:59, 21 January 2012 (UTC)
259:) 00:46, 28 December 2011 (UTC)
209:) 21:17, 24 December 2011 (UTC)
171:) 09:25, 11 December 2011 (UTC)
32:Please do not modify this page.
428:) 18:45, 26 January 2012 (UTC)
382:) 03:20, 26 January 2012 (UTC)
340:) 21:51, 21 January 2012 (UTC)
248:16:01, 27 December 2011 (UTC)
1:
303:20:50, 21 January 2012 (UTC)
286:00:34, 16 January 2012 (UTC)
189:23:34, 11 December 2011 (UTC)
408:16:59, 26 January 2012 (UTC)
367:01:14, 22 January 2012 (UTC)
322:reference, feel free to use
37:this nomination's talk page
459:
159:those advocating "sudden"
41:the article's talk page
140:Created/expanded by
420:All is good now. --
178:Agreed; changed.
149:
132:Bouteloua barbata
450:
419:
407:
396:
390:
365:
360:
357:
331:
325:
301:
296:
293:
285:
247:
223:
200:
188:
139:
98:
56:The result was:
34:
458:
457:
453:
452:
451:
449:
448:
447:
433:
432:
431:
398:
394:
388:
363:
358:
355:
329:
323:
299:
294:
291:
276:
273:Yongjia Xuanjue
238:
179:
100:
91:
89:
85:Article history
73:
67:
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
456:
454:
446:
445:
435:
434:
430:
429:
412:
411:
410:
409:
384:
383:
369:
368:
351:
350:
349:
348:
347:
346:
345:
344:
343:
342:
341:
263:
262:
261:
260:
217:
216:
215:
214:
213:
212:
211:
210:
191:
190:
173:
172:
137:
136:
135:
134:
122:
121:
92:
88:
87:
82:
80:Back to T:TDYK
76:
74:
72:
69:
54:
53:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
455:
444:
441:
440:
438:
427:
423:
418:
414:
413:
405:
401:
393:
386:
385:
381:
377:
373:
372:
371:
370:
366:
361:
352:
339:
335:
328:
320:
319:
317:
313:
309:
305:
304:
302:
297:
288:
287:
283:
279:
274:
269:
268:
267:
266:
265:
264:
258:
254:
250:
249:
245:
241:
235:
234:
233:
231:
227:
222:
208:
204:
199:
195:
194:
193:
192:
186:
182:
177:
176:
175:
174:
170:
166:
162:
158:
154:
153:
152:
151:
150:
147:
143:
133:
129:
126:
125:
124:
123:
119:
116:
112:
111:enlightenment
108:
107:
102:
101:
99:
97:
86:
83:
81:
78:
77:
70:
68:
65:
64:
59:
52:
50:
46:
42:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
395:}}
389:{{
330:}}
324:{{
218:
160:
156:
138:
127:
106:Heze Shenhui
104:
93:
61:
57:
55:
48:
31:
28:
253:Nikkimaria
226:Nikkimaria
400:DJLayton4
278:DJLayton4
240:DJLayton4
181:DJLayton4
142:Djlayton4
103:... that
437:Category
128:Reviewed
118:Buddhism
58:promoted
356:Pumpkin
334:Nyttend
292:Pumpkin
203:Yoninah
157:between
71:Shenhui
422:Orlady
376:Orlady
312:Orlady
63:Allen3
16:<
426:talk
404:talk
380:talk
364:talk
338:talk
316:talk
310:. --
300:talk
282:talk
257:talk
244:talk
230:talk
207:talk
185:talk
169:talk
165:Dahn
146:talk
359:Sky
295:Sky
161:vs.
115:Zen
113:in
60:by
43:or
439::
392:rp
327:rp
130::
75:(
39:,
424:(
406:)
402:(
378:(
336:(
314:(
284:)
280:(
255:(
246:)
242:(
228:(
205:(
187:)
183:(
167:(
144:(
120:?
90:)
51:.
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
