194:
276:
356:
296:
142:
202:
is not supported by an inline source citation at the end of the "chokepoint" sentence. If this hook is to be used, an extra citation (perhaps of the citation at the end of the succeeding sentence) will need to be added. Also, I've added the required space after the "..." in the hook, which is
197:
Neither hook is adequately supported by inline source citations. The original has a cite immediately before the article gives the information about prohibiting
Islamists, but nothing after it. Further, the article says he prevented "Islamist units", not all Islamists.
340:
Kind of boring, but I guess it's objectively fine. Better would be something regarding the anti-aircraft equipment captured, which has a greater battlefield impact. May I ask what the issue is with the source. ~~
359:
Ready to go with the original hook. Yesterday, the source failed to open on the 2 occasions I tried it and I was left with a blank screen but it does open for me today and confirms the hook fact.
383:
299:
Article is new enough and long enough and I believe it complies with policy as being neutral. The reference on which both hooks rely does not work for me. I suggest:
253:
Actually, it turned out that "Islamists" was the wording given by the citation (which was at the end of the paragraph), so this was right all along. ~~
36:
118:: Article originally supposed to be at ITN, but delay in news/writing made it a bit too "stale". Changed hook to something less "newsy".
17:
172:
has been described as "a strategic prize in the battle for Aleppo", as it occupies a chokepoint on the main army supply route from
346:
258:
231:
130:
145:
Length, date and hook reference are fine. I have the following suggestion as an alternate hook (ref 2), if acceptable.--
44:
342:
254:
227:
126:
79:
284:
208:
40:
364:
330:
29:
The following discussion is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below.
147:
317:
312:
280:
204:
168:
104:
95:
360:
326:
275:
377:
193:
62:
355:
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as
295:
141:
99:
47:), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page.
177:
173:
321:
226:
Alright, tweaking the original shouldn't be too hard. ~~
84:
133:). Self nom at 20:47, 26 November 2012 (UTC)
8:
49:No further edits should be made to this page
102:from serving under his command during the
384:Passed DYK nominations from November 2012
7:
66: 09:17, 11 December 2012 (UTC)
24:
98:general Ahmad al-Fajj prohibited
18:Template:Did you know nominations
354:
294:
274:
192:
140:
367:) 06:41, 10 December 2012 (UTC)
349:) 00:44, 10 December 2012 (UTC)
32:Please do not modify this page.
333:) 09:47, 9 December 2012 (UTC)
310:... that after the successful
287:) 07:19, 6 December 2012 (UTC)
261:) 07:45, 2 December 2012 (UTC)
234:) 07:41, 2 December 2012 (UTC)
211:) 04:18, 2 December 2012 (UTC)
153:. 03:58, 2 December 2012 (UTC)
1:
45:Knowledge talk:Did you know
37:this nomination's talk page
400:
41:the article's talk page
343:Lothar von Richthofen
255:Lothar von Richthofen
228:Lothar von Richthofen
127:Lothar von Richthofen
125:Created/expanded by
279:Needs new review.
203:specified by DYK.
134:
391:
358:
320:, about fifteen
318:Free Syrian Army
313:Siege of Base 46
298:
278:
196:
150:
144:
124:
105:Siege of Base 46
96:Free Syrian Army
71:Siege of Base 46
56:The result was:
34:
399:
398:
394:
393:
392:
390:
389:
388:
374:
373:
372:
148:
91:
89:
85:Article history
73:
67:
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
397:
395:
387:
386:
376:
375:
371:
370:
369:
368:
351:
350:
335:
334:
324:were captured?
303:
302:
301:
300:
289:
288:
271:
270:
269:
268:
267:
266:
265:
264:
263:
262:
242:
241:
240:
239:
238:
237:
236:
235:
217:
216:
215:
214:
213:
212:
185:
184:
183:
182:
157:
156:
155:
154:
122:
121:
120:
119:
110:
109:
88:
87:
82:
80:Back to T:TDYK
76:
74:
72:
69:
54:
53:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
396:
385:
382:
381:
379:
366:
362:
357:
353:
352:
348:
344:
339:
338:
337:
336:
332:
328:
325:
323:
319:
315:
314:
309:
305:
304:
297:
293:
292:
291:
290:
286:
282:
277:
273:
272:
260:
256:
252:
251:
250:
249:
248:
247:
246:
245:
244:
243:
233:
229:
225:
224:
223:
222:
221:
220:
219:
218:
210:
206:
201:
195:
191:
190:
189:
188:
187:
186:
181:
179:
175:
171:
170:
165:
161:
160:
159:
158:
152:
151:
143:
139:
138:
137:
136:
135:
132:
128:
117:
114:
113:
112:
111:
107:
106:
101:
97:
93:
92:
86:
83:
81:
78:
77:
70:
68:
65:
64:
59:
52:
50:
46:
42:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
311:
307:
306:
199:
167:
163:
162:
146:
123:
115:
103:
61:
57:
55:
48:
31:
28:
281:BlueMoonset
205:BlueMoonset
361:Cwmhiraeth
327:Cwmhiraeth
166:... that
100:Islamists
94:... that
378:Category
58:promoted
316:by the
169:Base 46
149:Nvvchar
116:Comment
178:Aleppo
63:Allen3
322:tanks
200:Alt 1
174:Idlib
164:Alt 1
16:<
365:talk
347:talk
331:talk
308:ALT2
285:talk
259:talk
232:talk
209:talk
131:talk
176:to
60:by
43:or
380::
75:(
39:,
363:(
345:(
329:(
283:(
257:(
230:(
207:(
180:?
129:(
108:?
90:)
51:.
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
