324:
240:
383:
300:
268:
362:. In honesty I am very surprised to read a suggestion of CLOP, and in particular on that sentence. There is a very limited number of ways to state that the quay was built between two walls, with the gap between was filled with material dredged from the river. That statement (to my own read) falls into the category of
281:
quote. The reason I didn't is because I personally don't like DYK hooks that refer to someone's opinion. ("Did you know about X's opinion concerning Y?" seems weak IMO. When compared to "Did you know about fact X concerning Y?"). If you can propose an alternative hook, then please let me know. Though
243:
Article has been recently expanded fivefold and is long enough to qualify. No policy issues that I can see. The latter half of the hook is fine, but the first part (18th century private development) is in a separate part of the article and is not referenced in-line; it would be better to remove it
303:
Alright, my main issue (the citation) has been addressed. As for the hook itself, I mistakenly thought that the facts in the hook would need to be in the same sentence/paragraph in order to qualify, but a further look at the guidelines says otherwise. Good work.
277:'"18th century private development" should be removed' - If we think it's a big problem, then happy to remove it. However, personally, that it was a private development is (IMO) significant. In fact, I had even considered making this the hook. Alone. Referencing
274:'"18th century private development" is in a separate part of the article' - I don't really understand whether/what is meant here, or if this is a an issue to be solved. Or an observation. If we can improve something here, just let me know.
366:. I have however reviewed the snippet. And revised slightly. If considered insufficient, then I'm not sure what else to suggest. As any further changes would result in an awkward construct that would not represent natural language use.
93:
192:
431:
88:
36:
17:
40:
393:
yes, I see what you mean. It looks like it's enough to replace "river" with "Liffey". Restoring tick per SoundBruce's review.
44:
160:
143:
83:
178:
311:
278:
251:
113:
118:
371:
292:
228:
213:
282:
personally I don't see what problem is caused by including the words "private development"...(?)
398:
363:
346:
306:
287:
Thanks again for taking the time and effort. Hopefully addressing the inline ref issue helps.
246:
103:
65:
388:
367:
288:
224:
209:
327:
There is some close paraphrasing which needs to be rewritten/rephrased in your own words:
267:'"18th century private development" is not referenced in line' - This is now addressed
339:: The gap between these walls was filled with sand and gravel dredged from the river.
425:
98:
323:
239:
29:
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below.
394:
359:
342:
333:: The land between the walls was filled with sand and gravel dredged from the river
173:
61:
169:
382:
299:
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as
123:
264:
Hi. Thanks so much for taking the time to review. On the points raised:
165:
47:), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page.
244:
all together, as it wouldn't really be missed. QPQ is fine.
270:
205:
201:
148:
108:
208:. Expanded about 7x between 27 Jan and 30 Jan 2017.
231:). Self-nominated at 17:15, 30 January 2017 (UTC).
8:
49:No further edits should be made to this page
164:was a private development in 18th-century
71:
432:Passed DYK nominations from January 2017
74:
7:
168:, and became home to a 19th-century
24:
18:Template:Did you know nominations
381:
322:
298:
238:
295:) 16:49, 4 February 2017 (UTC)
32:Please do not modify this page.
401:) 09:52, 9 February 2017 (UTC)
374:) 00:49, 9 February 2017 (UTC)
349:) 23:06, 8 February 2017 (UTC)
216:) 17:15, 30 January 2017 (UTC)
68:) 09:54, 9 February 2017 (UTC)
1:
317:23:19, 4 February 2017 (UTC)
257:04:46, 4 February 2017 (UTC)
200:: Created in Sep 2008 as a
45:Knowledge talk:Did you know
37:this nomination's talk page
448:
119:Find sources (notability)
94:Earwig's Copyvio Detector
172:used to further develop
161:Sir John Rogerson's Quay
135:Sir John Rogerson's Quay
204:. It remained so until
41:the article's talk page
193:Robert Napuʻuako Boyd
109:A Simple Word Counter
89:Reviewer instructions
134:
114:Reviewers' template
232:
180:
132:
131:
439:
392:
385:
326:
314:
309:
302:
254:
249:
242:
222:
72:
56:The result was:
34:
447:
446:
442:
441:
440:
438:
437:
436:
422:
421:
420:
386:
312:
307:
252:
247:
223:5x expanded by
155:
153:
149:Article history
137:
128:
104:Character count
69:
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
445:
443:
435:
434:
424:
423:
419:
418:
417:
416:
415:
414:
413:
412:
411:
410:
409:
408:
407:
406:
405:
404:
403:
402:
376:
375:
351:
350:
340:
334:
328:
285:
284:
283:
275:
272:
259:
258:
220:
219:
218:
217:
195:
183:
182:
174:Dublin's quays
152:
151:
146:
144:Back to T:TDYK
140:
138:
136:
133:
130:
129:
127:
126:
121:
116:
111:
106:
101:
96:
91:
86:
80:
77:
76:
54:
53:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
444:
433:
430:
429:
427:
400:
396:
390:
384:
380:
379:
378:
377:
373:
369:
365:
361:
357:
356:
355:
354:
353:
352:
348:
344:
341:
338:
335:
332:
329:
325:
321:
320:
319:
318:
316:
315:
310:
301:
297:
296:
294:
290:
286:
280:
276:
273:
271:
269:
266:
265:
263:
262:
261:
260:
256:
255:
250:
241:
237:
236:
235:
234:
233:
230:
226:
215:
211:
207:
203:
199:
196:
194:
190:
187:
186:
185:
184:
179:
177:
175:
171:
167:
163:
162:
157:
156:
150:
147:
145:
142:
141:
125:
122:
120:
117:
115:
112:
110:
107:
105:
102:
100:
97:
95:
92:
90:
87:
85:
82:
81:
79:
78:
73:
70:
67:
63:
59:
52:
50:
46:
42:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
336:
330:
305:
245:
221:
197:
188:
159:
57:
55:
48:
31:
28:
279:de Courcy's
170:diving bell
124:Hook length
75:DYK toolbox
389:Guliolopez
368:Guliolopez
364:WP:LIMITED
289:Guliolopez
225:Guliolopez
210:Guliolopez
206:last week
158:... that
99:QPQ check
84:DYK check
426:Category
202:oneliner
189:Reviewed
58:promoted
395:Yoninah
360:Yoninah
343:Yoninah
337:Article
308:Sounder
248:Sounder
198:Comment
62:Yoninah
331:Source
166:Dublin
313:Bruce
253:Bruce
16:<
399:talk
372:talk
347:talk
293:talk
229:talk
214:talk
66:talk
358:Hi
176:?
60:by
43:or
428::
191::
139:(
39:,
397:(
391::
387:@
370:(
345:(
291:(
227:(
212:(
181:]
154:)
64:(
51:.
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
