374:
548:
554:
309:
289:
278:
249:
238:
352:
there's nothing particularly interesting about it having been in their second year.Possible topics for a more interesting hook include the amusingly low standards of player selection and the fact that for four consecutive years their only win was against
Hampshire ("... that 1883 was the second of four seasons in which...").
340:
331:
351:
point, right?" A "first" can be interesting if it's groundbreaking (e.g. the first century by any team) or happens under unusual circumstances (e.g. if
Somerset had taken 20 years, or conversely gotten one in their first innings), but every cricket team had their first century at some point, and
481:
you are expected to take full responsibility for an edit you make on behalf of a banned user, which I would dare say extends to nominating someone else's article for DYK when they're banned from DYK. (Not to say I think you were asked to do this; the point is that you need to be exercising
93:
475:, so I'd be fine approving a version of that; however, it has it a bit backward, making it seem like the quote is an insult based on the poor quality, rather than what it actually is: an explanation for that poor quality.
334:- Have you verified this hook personally? The editor who brought the article to GA is banned from DYK, so I don't think an AGF-pass would be in the spirit of policy here if you haven't checked the source yourself.
178:
542:
347:, but I don't see how this is "interesting or unusual", honestly even to a specialized audience. It falls into the category I think of as "Well that had to happen at
88:
453:
I can't personally access any sources that are offline but it seems like they were indeffed from DYK due to obscene immaturity rather than any sourcing concerns.
208:
36:
589:
40:
510:
444:
432:
412:
160:
17:
295:
303:
170:
Source: Hill, Stephen (2016). Somerset
Cricketers 1882–1914. Wellington, Somerset: Halsgrove. ISBN 978-0-85704-291-0. Page 62
436:
was told as being "determined with a nod and a wink over drinks" due to their relatively low standards of player selection?"
44:
421:
417:
519:
Though I do just wonder if I should just withdraw this nom since I was unaware of the C of E being indeffed from DYK.
272:
477:
As to the rest, hard no, not if you can't verify them yourself. This is your nomination, not the C of E's, and per
143:
325:
243:
232:
83:
299:
524:
458:
378:
200:
113:
118:
478:
65:
165:
472:
541:
here? (Why is his name in the nomination template then? Is that a thing? I wasn't credited for
532:
520:
466:
454:
344:
196:
192:
103:
283:
204:
61:
482:
independent judgment, not asking me to AGF of someone who's been banned from this venue.)
212:
583:
98:
373:
29:
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below.
188:
547:
561:
500:
487:
399:
385:
377:
Article is fine, but hook needs improvement. Fun fact: This is the 21st link in
553:
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as
215:
this nomination, if it is successful, until the hook appears on the Main Page.
514:
has been described as being "determined with a nod and a wink over drinks"?.
123:
209:
Template talk:Did you know nominations/Somerset County
Cricket Club in 1883
203:) at 20:06, 7 May 2023 (UTC). Post-promotion hook changes for this nom
47:), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page.
508:"... that the relatively low standards of player selection for
545:(nor would I have accepted credit).) Happy AGFing of Harrias.
265:
Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems
343:- Sorry to ding you twice in a row on interestingness,
148:
258:
218:
179:
Template:Did you know nominations/William W. Jefferis
543:
Template:Did you know nominations/Joseph (art model)
108:
537:Oh, wait, this is a mess. The C of E was the
8:
416:was the second of four seasons in which the
49:No further edits should be made to this page
71:
74:
505:Alright then. Here's a reword of alt2
225:Article is new enough and long enough
448:was seen as relatively low standard?"
442:: "... that the player selection for
430:: "... that the player selection for
7:
590:Passed DYK nominations from May 2023
511:Somerset County Cricket Club in 1883
445:Somerset County Cricket Club in 1883
433:Somerset County Cricket Club in 1883
135:Somerset County Cricket Club in 1883
420:had their only victory against the
187:Improved to Good Article status by
161:Somerset scored their first century
24:
45:Knowledge (XXG) talk:Did you know
18:Template:Did you know nominations
552:
546:
372:
338:
329:
307:
287:
276:
247:
236:
68:) 18:00, 20 May 2023 (UTC)
32:Please do not modify this page.
1:
422:Hampshire County Cricket Club
418:Somerset County Cricket Club
381:that goes back to May 2021!
527:) 03:10, 16 May 2023 (UTC)
461:) 02:20, 16 May 2023 (UTC)
355:
37:this nomination's talk page
606:
404:For your hook suggestions
495:03:04, 16 May 2023 (UTC)
393:21:47, 13 May 2023 (UTC)
119:Find sources (notability)
94:Earwig's Copyvio Detector
569:03:13, 16 May 2023 (UTC)
567:(she|they|xe)
493:(she|they|xe)
391:(she|they|xe)
41:the article's talk page
109:A Simple Word Counter
89:Reviewer instructions
296:copyright violations
473:the source for ALT2
166:first-class cricket
114:Reviewers' template
304:close paraphrasing
366:
365:
320:Hook eligibility:
317:
316:
273:Adequate sourcing
257:
256:
216:
171:
132:
131:
597:
568:
566:
564:
556:
550:
536:
504:
494:
492:
490:
470:
403:
392:
390:
388:
376:
356:
342:
341:
333:
332:
311:
310:
291:
290:
280:
279:
259:
251:
250:
240:
239:
219:
195:). Nominated by
186:
169:
72:
56:The result was:
34:
605:
604:
600:
599:
598:
596:
595:
594:
580:
579:
578:
562:
559:
558:
530:
498:
488:
485:
484:
483:
464:
397:
386:
383:
382:
339:
330:
308:
288:
277:
248:
237:
155:
153:
149:Article history
137:
128:
104:Character count
69:
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
603:
601:
593:
592:
582:
581:
577:
576:
575:
574:
573:
572:
571:
570:
540:
517:
516:
515:
476:
451:
450:
449:
437:
425:
364:
363:
354:
353:
350:
335:
315:
314:
313:
312:
292:
281:
267:
266:
255:
254:
253:
252:
241:
227:
226:
205:will be logged
184:
183:
182:
181:
152:
151:
146:
144:Back to T:TDYK
140:
138:
136:
133:
130:
129:
127:
126:
121:
116:
111:
106:
101:
96:
91:
86:
80:
77:
76:
54:
53:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
602:
591:
588:
587:
585:
565:
555:
549:
544:
538:
534:
529:
528:
526:
522:
518:
513:
512:
507:
506:
502:
497:
496:
491:
480:
474:
471:I can verify
468:
463:
462:
460:
456:
452:
447:
446:
441:
438:
435:
434:
429:
426:
423:
419:
415:
414:
409:
406:
405:
401:
396:
395:
394:
389:
380:
375:
370:
361:
358:
357:
348:
346:
337:Interesting:
336:
327:
324:
323:
322:
321:
305:
301:
297:
293:
285:
282:
274:
271:
270:
269:
268:
264:
261:
260:
245:
242:
234:
231:
230:
229:
228:
224:
221:
220:
217:
214:
210:
206:
202:
198:
194:
190:
180:
176:
173:
172:
167:
163:
162:
157:
156:
150:
147:
145:
142:
141:
134:
125:
122:
120:
117:
115:
112:
110:
107:
105:
102:
100:
97:
95:
92:
90:
87:
85:
82:
81:
79:
78:
73:
70:
67:
63:
59:
52:
50:
46:
42:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
551:on ALT1 and
533:Onegreatjoke
521:Onegreatjoke
509:
467:Onegreatjoke
455:Onegreatjoke
443:
439:
431:
427:
411:
410:: "... that
407:
368:
367:
359:
345:Onegreatjoke
319:
318:
262:
222:
197:Onegreatjoke
185:
174:
159:
57:
55:
48:
31:
28:
479:WP:PROXYING
379:a QPQ chain
244:Long enough
211:; consider
124:Hook length
75:DYK toolbox
300:plagiarism
233:New enough
62:Lightburst
168:in 1883?
158:... that
99:QPQ check
84:DYK check
584:Category
539:reviewer
362:: Done.
294:Free of
223:General:
213:watching
175:Reviewed
58:promoted
369:Overall
284:Neutral
263:Policy:
199: (
191: (
189:Harrias
563:Tamzin
501:Tamzin
489:Tamzin
400:Tamzin
387:Tamzin
302:, and
326:Cited
16:<
525:talk
459:talk
440:ALT3
428:ALT2
413:1883
408:ALT1
349:some
201:talk
193:talk
66:talk
560:--
557:2.
486:--
384:--
360:QPQ
207:at
164:in
60:by
43:or
586::
371::
328::
306::
298:,
286::
275::
246::
235::
177::
139:(
39:,
535::
531:@
523:(
503::
499:@
469::
465:@
457:(
424:?
402::
398:@
154:)
64:(
51:.
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.