160:
222:
278:
The article is relatively short (approx 1,700 characters) if you exclude the table of fees & charges (which appears to be more travel information/guide) but mets the 1,500 criteria. I would prefer to see more substance to the article as it is a borderline stub
294:
In respect to the hook, as the reference indicates that the park was only open for two months the early attendance figures are always likely to set a record as there is nothing to compare against (apart from the preceding month).
93:
319:
Actually i am still in processing of gaining better understanding of the DYK nominations, and worked on this as an initial try. I was not sure about the nomination title, but as per your suggestions, i plan to do it for
343:. Just note that there is a time limit between when the article is created and when the DYK is lodged. I would suggest you that you withdraw this nomination and lodge a new one for Sajjangarh Biological Park.
240:. The nominator indicates that they have reviewed Sajjangarh Biological Park however there is no DYK for Sajjangarh Biological Park and on top of that Sajjangarh Biological Park was created by the nominator.
159:
365:
88:
36:
180:
had received more than 46,000 visitors in a month, generating a revenue of Rs 14 lakh for the forest department, which is a record in itself?
40:
17:
244:
233:
177:
288:
The article contains a number of local terms that should be linked, to enable readers to understand what is being described.
44:
321:
266:
237:
191:
172:
143:
324:. I would work upon the article further, make corrections and add more content as per your suggestions. Thanks.
83:
291:
The hook is relatively wordy (coming in at almost 220 characters) and tries to pack in too much information.
113:
329:
213:
205:
118:
348:
309:
229:
103:
65:
285:
There are also a number of significant statements within the article lacking inline citations
259:
There are also a number of significant statements within the article lacking inline citations
340:
325:
209:
201:
344:
305:
225:
359:
98:
232:) 06:04, 4 September 2015 (UTC) This nomination is extremely confusing as it is for
29:
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below.
61:
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as
221:
123:
47:), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page.
275:
The article is new enough created two days before nomination
148:
108:
282:
The article contains a number of grammatical errors
253:The article is too old and is not a 5x increase
164:Foundation stone of Sajjangarh Biological Park
8:
256:The article contains numerous empty sections
49:No further edits should be made to this page
71:
366:Failed DYK nominations from August 2015
74:
236:however the hook appears to relate to
7:
269:then the following comments apply:
24:
216:) at 06:34, 30 August 2015 (UTC).
45:Knowledge (XXG) talk:Did you know
18:Template:Did you know nominations
332:) 05:04, 8 September 2015 (UTC)
247:then it fails the DYK criteria:
220:
158:
351:) 05:43, 8 September 2015 (UTC)
32:Please do not modify this page.
304:Thanks for providing feedback
245:Tourist attractions in Udaipur
234:Tourist attractions in Udaipur
178:Tourist attractions in Udaipur
135:Tourist attractions in Udaipur
1:
68:) 19:16, 8 October 2015 (UTC)
37:this nomination's talk page
382:
339:I will leave it up to you
322:Sajjangarh Biological Park
267:Sajjangarh Biological Park
238:Sajjangarh Biological Park
192:Sajjangarh Biological Park
173:Sajjangarh Biological Park
265:If the nomination is for
243:If the nomination is for
119:Find sources (notability)
94:Earwig's Copyvio Detector
41:the article's talk page
109:A Simple Word Counter
89:Reviewer instructions
114:Reviewers' template
217:
132:
131:
373:
224:
208:). Nominated by
199:
162:
72:
56:The result was:
34:
381:
380:
376:
375:
374:
372:
371:
370:
356:
355:
354:
313:
200:5x expanded by
167:
166:
165:
155:
153:
149:Article history
137:
128:
104:Character count
69:
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
379:
377:
369:
368:
358:
357:
353:
352:
317:
316:
315:
314:
299:
298:
297:
296:
292:
289:
286:
283:
280:
276:
263:
262:
261:
260:
257:
254:
197:
196:
195:
194:
182:
181:
163:
157:
156:
152:
151:
146:
144:Back to T:TDYK
140:
138:
136:
133:
130:
129:
127:
126:
121:
116:
111:
106:
101:
96:
91:
86:
80:
77:
76:
54:
53:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
378:
367:
364:
363:
361:
350:
346:
342:
338:
335:
334:
333:
331:
327:
323:
311:
307:
303:
302:
301:
300:
293:
290:
287:
284:
281:
277:
274:
273:
272:
271:
270:
268:
258:
255:
252:
251:
250:
249:
248:
246:
241:
239:
235:
231:
227:
223:
218:
215:
211:
207:
203:
193:
189:
186:
185:
184:
183:
179:
176:, one of the
175:
174:
170:... that the
169:
168:
161:
150:
147:
145:
142:
141:
134:
125:
122:
120:
117:
115:
112:
110:
107:
105:
102:
100:
97:
95:
92:
90:
87:
85:
82:
81:
79:
78:
73:
70:
67:
63:
59:
52:
50:
46:
42:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
336:
318:
264:
242:
219:
198:
187:
171:
57:
55:
48:
31:
28:
341:Vishal0soni
326:Vishal0soni
210:Vishal0soni
202:Vishal0soni
124:Hook length
75:DYK toolbox
345:Dan arndt
306:Dan arndt
226:Dan arndt
99:QPQ check
84:DYK check
360:Category
279:article.
188:Reviewed
58:rejected
337:Comment
62:Fuebaey
16:<
349:talk
330:talk
310:talk
230:talk
214:talk
206:talk
66:talk
60:by
43:or
362::
312:).
190::
139:(
39:,
347:(
328:(
308:(
295:·
228:(
212:(
204:(
154:)
64:(
51:.
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
