101:
151:
181:
100:
36:
17:
44:
131:
84:
154:
Article and source (which includes a U.S. distribution map) back up the hook. Everything seems good to go!
127:
40:
66:
29:
The following discussion is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below.
159:
139:
110:
175:
61:
155:
135:
150:
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as
118:
47:), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page.
89:
8:
49:No further edits should be made to this page
182:Passed DYK nominations from January 2012
7:
108:... that despite its common name,
24:
142:) at 22:53, 22 January 2012 (UTC)
45:Knowledge (XXG) talk:Did you know
18:Template:Did you know nominations
149:
99:
32:Please do not modify this page.
162:) 23:01, 26 January 2012 (UTC)
1:
71:20:59, 27 January 2012 (UTC)
37:this nomination's talk page
198:
117:is not naturally found in
41:the article's talk page
126:Created/expanded by
128:IceCreamAntisocial
143:
134:). Nominated by
189:
153:
125:
111:California grass
103:
69:
64:
56:The result was:
34:
197:
196:
192:
191:
190:
188:
187:
186:
172:
171:
170:
168:
105:
96:
94:
90:Article history
78:
76:Urochloa mutica
72:
67:
62:
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
195:
193:
185:
184:
174:
173:
166:
165:
164:
163:
123:
122:
97:
93:
92:
87:
85:Back to T:TDYK
81:
79:
77:
74:
54:
53:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
194:
183:
180:
179:
177:
169:
161:
157:
152:
148:
147:
146:
145:
144:
141:
137:
133:
129:
120:
116:
113:
112:
107:
106:
104:
102:
91:
88:
86:
83:
82:
75:
73:
70:
65:
59:
52:
50:
46:
42:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
167:
124:
114:
109:
98:
57:
55:
48:
31:
28:
119:California
115:(pictured)
176:Category
63:Miyagawa
58:promoted
156:Scanlan
136:PFHLai
68:(talk)
16:<
160:talk
140:talk
132:talk
60:by
43:or
178::
80:(
39:,
158:(
138:(
130:(
121:?
95:)
51:.
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
