160:
754:
346:, It doesn't look like much for today but it was a masterpiece in that day. So annoyed that the book will not show me the first page again. I'm sure another hook can be worked but, I suppose I just wanted to plug the map, which will not be considered impressive at a cursory glance, while the impressiveness of the buildings will speak for themselves in modern pictures. 500 years later and in a library that claims 80kms of documents specific to Venice, it remains the definitive source for the Venice of that day.
802:
355:(looks like a modern day school book drawing, so I think that establishes, but so unfair that it wont show me the first page again when it will give me like a dozen other pages through the book! I was so bored by the first page I swear.) So, I could go on and on about it, but needless to say, the best plug for the subject is to plug the map. It is the only part of the article that will not be understood without explanation.
822:
715:
825:
This substantial article replaces a redirect and is new enough and long enough. The image for the original hook is too wishy-washy at thumbnail size for use, but the
Palladio image is OK and properly licensed. The original hook and ALT6 facts are cited inline, the article is neutral and I detected no
190:
Source: I don't have the exact quote, it was the whole of the first page and now google wont let me see it again, sorry, but it was the first thing said in the book, it begins something like, "In 1500, Anton Kolb published a birdseye woodcut of Venice" and goes on about how it was important through
310:
I don't have a problem with the hook, but "popular guide through the early part of the
Renaissance" is dubious. The woodcut is extremely large (Height: 132.7 cm (52.2 ″); Width: 277.5 cm (109.2 ″) - wider than a king-size bed sheet is long) and would have been pretty expensive. In fact the image
452:
Or to that effect but have preceded Italy, which is also interesting, and maybe better I guess. Yeah there might be an article in that map I was impressed with it though it's not modern standards. 3 meters wide and 3 years, all those rooves, it's a real work. Note the factory-esque roof.
573:
On Alt 4: Does it show this evolution? The article says that "The Doge's Palace was much rebuilt after fires, but mostly behind the Gothic facades." Do we see much (or anything) behind these facades? I looked in vain for backup elsewhere but was unsuccessful: The article
159:
311:
metadata rightly says "The View was very expensive when published and most examples were probably displayed on walls". And 1500 on is not really "the early part of the
Renaissance". Plus it's too long for a DYK caption. I'd just say "
93:
331:
Printing and map making 500 years ago was not the same thing as it was today. It was a grand work. It took 3 years to complete, as long as Van Goghs whole art career. It was one of the finest works, sometimes claimed as
607:, I'm adding myself to the nom, as I've now written most of the text. I'd only mess the template up - perhaps someone who knows how could add me? Probably a new hook suggestion soon, & maybe pic.
740:, with this or on its own, but as is usual with this editor, there are many too few inline cites, though several good sources are given at the bottom. So I don't think it is a runner, unfortunately.
343:
850:
753:
235:
88:
336:
finest (see what I am getting at), of its kind in the whole world at the time. After completing it, the artist was given a job as a portrait artist for an emperor
36:
340:
578:
says "Doge's Palace is depicted about 50% taller than it should be if it were depicted to scale", suggesting that veracity would be dubious; the article
434:
It's still too long, or you'd rather something on the architecture? What about this (I may have to expand but it was definitely in some of the sources),
40:
500:
Linked at the article anyway - great to see this! It would need more refs for a double DYK nom, but as an unbolded link should be fine.
772:
666:
550:
446:
370:
179:
17:
44:
545:
143:
728:
688:
566:
522:
464:
386:
292:
255:
83:
164:
View of Venice from woodcut, popular guide through the early part of the
Renaissance SEE BELOW - NOW REPLACED!
113:
810:
118:
706:
We need two small easy reviews on this one. We need someone to add a second article to the nomination,
661:
312:
174:
831:
397:
has one framed on the wall. As I said, personally I have no problem with the hook, just the caption.
784:
487:
353:
184:
393:
You should do an article on it. It does in fact look very impressive today - the
British Museum
792:
745:
612:
505:
422:
402:
365:
323:
271:
218:
103:
65:
806:
579:
541:
482:
could be added. But I am not going to fix it up to meet any reviewer's arbitrary comments.
441:
827:
587:
801:
737:
708:
672:
575:
536:
479:
844:
724:
684:
562:
518:
483:
460:
382:
288:
251:
226:
210:
98:
29:
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below.
826:
copyright issues. A QPQ has been done. I have struck the other hooks for clarity.
788:
741:
608:
582:
doesn't seem to mention this "view" at all, though I may have missed something. --
501:
418:
398:
319:
267:
214:
61:
821:
337:
339:
It represents not only the plan of the city, but the
Venetian culture at the time
244:
I do not know how to get the picture to display. It's in the template text here,
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as
583:
394:
123:
778:
759:
720:
680:
604:
558:
514:
456:
378:
284:
247:
222:
206:
47:), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page.
714:
344:
File:Jacopo de' Barbari - View of Venice - alternative.jpg
148:
417:
I've edited the article, & so won't be reviewing.
108:
368:map Venetie MD, remains a definitive resource on
236:Template:Did you know nominations/S. Dharmambal
783:were not natives of the city, or even of the
630:User:Johnbod and User:Theramin added to noms.
8:
49:No further edits should be made to this page
787:?" 2 refs (current ref 20), but to books.
351:Check out the next best map appearing 1557
71:
851:Passed DYK nominations from February 2019
191:the century for at least one page of text
444:is sometimes argued to have evoked the
74:
371:buildings of the Venetian Renaissance
7:
229:) at 14:10, 18 February 2019 (UTC).
24:
805:Full review needed. Many thanks.
773:Venetian Renaissance architecture
667:Venetian Renaissance architecture
135:Venetian Renaissance architecture
45:Knowledge (XXG) talk:Did you know
18:Template:Did you know nominations
820:
800:
752:
713:
508:) 05:22, 24 February 2019 (UTC)
415:Note - the above is not a review
326:) 00:41, 19 February 2019 (UTC)
183:detailing the appearance of the
158:
590:) 12:49, 27 February 2019 (UTC)
490:) 02:32, 24 February 2019 (UTC)
425:) 15:19, 19 February 2019 (UTC)
405:) 15:03, 19 February 2019 (UTC)
274:) 22:21, 18 February 2019 (UTC)
32:Please do not modify this page.
770:"... most major architects of
570:19:58, 25 February 2019 (UTC)
390:11:20, 19 February 2019 (UTC)
1:
736:I would love to nominate the
526:19:39, 25 February 2019 (UTC)
468:17:30, 19 February 2019 (UTC)
348:(or start reading here-->)
296:19:58, 25 February 2019 (UTC)
259:20:20, 18 February 2019 (UTC)
187:for much of the 16th century?
813:) 21:14, 25 March 2019 (UTC)
795:) 21:16, 11 March 2019 (UTC)
748:) 18:23, 11 March 2019 (UTC)
615:) 02:12, 10 March 2019 (UTC)
546:Venetian Gothic architecture
447:Rennaissance in architecture
342:Check out the artwork -->
68:) 15:43, 21 April 2019 (UTC)
834:) 06:30, 7 April 2019 (UTC)
732:07:23, 10 March 2019 (UTC)
603:With the kind agreement of
544:in 1500, a fine example of
37:this nomination's talk page
867:
692:07:23, 10 March 2019 (UTC)
664:3 years to describe early
119:Find sources (notability)
94:Earwig's Copyvio Detector
551:Renaissance Architecture
266:I formatted it for you.
359:, (new reference added)
41:the article's talk page
173:... that a woodcut by
766:Ok, starting afresh!
511:Well done, thanks o/
109:A Simple Word Counter
89:Reviewer instructions
180:definitive resource
114:Reviewers' template
785:Republic of Venice
662:Jacopo de' Barbari
366:Jacopo de Barbaris
175:Jacopo de' Barbari
712:. We need hooks.
655:Suggesting hook,
230:
192:
132:
131:
858:
824:
804:
756:
731:
717:
691:
569:
548:, evolving into
525:
467:
389:
295:
281:Thanks, Yoninah
258:
221:). Nominated by
204:
189:
162:
72:
56:The result was:
34:
866:
865:
861:
860:
859:
857:
856:
855:
841:
840:
839:
763:
762:
718:
678:
556:
512:
454:
376:
282:
245:
167:
166:
165:
155:
153:
149:Article history
137:
128:
104:Character count
69:
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
864:
862:
854:
853:
843:
842:
838:
837:
836:
835:
815:
814:
797:
796:
757:
751:
750:
749:
738:View of Venice
709:View of Venice
704:
703:
702:
701:
700:
699:
698:
697:
696:
695:
694:
693:
673:View of Venice
642:
641:
640:
639:
638:
637:
636:
635:
634:
633:
632:
631:
617:
616:
600:
599:
598:
597:
596:
595:
594:
593:
592:
591:
576:View of Venice
537:View of Venice
534:"...Barbari's
527:
493:
492:
480:View of Venice
474:
473:
472:
471:
470:
469:
427:
426:
412:
411:
410:
409:
408:
407:
406:
304:
303:
302:
301:
300:
299:
298:
297:
276:
275:
261:
260:
239:
238:
202:
201:
200:
199:
194:
193:
185:City of Venice
163:
157:
156:
152:
151:
146:
144:Back to T:TDYK
140:
138:
136:
133:
130:
129:
127:
126:
121:
116:
111:
106:
101:
96:
91:
86:
80:
77:
76:
54:
53:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
863:
852:
849:
848:
846:
833:
829:
823:
819:
818:
817:
816:
812:
808:
803:
799:
798:
794:
790:
786:
782:
780:
775:
774:
769:
765:
764:
761:
755:
747:
743:
739:
735:
734:
733:
730:
726:
722:
716:
711:
710:
690:
686:
682:
677:
675:
674:
669:
668:
663:
658:
654:
653:
652:
651:
650:
649:
648:
647:
646:
645:
644:
643:
629:
628:
627:
626:
625:
624:
623:
622:
621:
620:
619:
618:
614:
610:
606:
602:
601:
589:
585:
581:
580:Doge's Palace
577:
572:
571:
568:
564:
560:
555:
553:
552:
547:
543:
542:Doge's Palace
539:
538:
532:
529:How about...
528:
524:
520:
516:
510:
509:
507:
503:
499:
498:
497:
496:
495:
494:
491:
489:
485:
481:
476:
475:
466:
462:
458:
451:
449:
448:
443:
442:Doge's Palace
437:
433:
432:
431:
430:
429:
428:
424:
420:
416:
413:
404:
400:
396:
392:
391:
388:
384:
380:
375:
373:
372:
367:
362:
358:
354:
352:
349:
345:
341:
338:
335:
330:
329:
328:
327:
325:
321:
317:
316:Map of Venice
314:
309:
306:
305:
294:
290:
286:
280:
279:
278:
277:
273:
269:
265:
264:
263:
262:
257:
253:
249:
243:
242:
241:
240:
237:
233:
232:
231:
228:
224:
220:
216:
212:
208:
198:
197:
196:
195:
188:
186:
182:
181:
176:
171:
170:
169:
161:
150:
147:
145:
142:
141:
134:
125:
122:
120:
117:
115:
112:
110:
107:
105:
102:
100:
97:
95:
92:
90:
87:
85:
82:
81:
79:
78:
73:
70:
67:
63:
59:
52:
50:
46:
42:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
776:
771:
767:
707:
705:
671:
665:
660:"...it took
659:
656:
549:
535:
533:
530:
477:
445:
440:...that the
439:
435:
414:
369:
363:
360:
356:
350:
347:
333:
315:
313:de Barbari's
307:
203:
178:
172:
168:
57:
55:
48:
31:
28:
807:BlueMoonset
205:Created by
124:Hook length
75:DYK toolbox
828:Cwmhiraeth
777:(villa by
540:shows the
478:A link to
395:print room
357:What about
781:pictured)
758:villa by
364:"...that
318:, 1500".
99:QPQ check
84:DYK check
845:Category
779:Palladio
760:Palladio
605:User:RTG
484:Theramin
177:was the
58:promoted
789:Johnbod
742:Johnbod
670:in his
609:Johnbod
502:Johnbod
419:Johnbod
399:Johnbod
320:Johnbod
308:Comment
268:Yoninah
215:Johnbod
62:Yoninah
213:) and
676:...?"
584:Hoary
531:Alt 4
450:...?"
374:...?"
234:QPQ:-
16:<
832:talk
811:talk
793:talk
768:ALT6
746:talk
657:ALT5
613:talk
588:talk
506:talk
488:talk
436:ALT3
423:talk
403:talk
361:ALT2
324:talk
272:talk
227:talk
219:talk
211:talk
66:talk
334:the
223:RTG
207:RTG
60:by
43:or
847::
719:~
679:~
557:~
554:?"
513:~
455:~
377:~
283:~
246:~
139:(
39:,
830:(
809:(
791:(
744:(
729:G
727:.
725:T
723:.
721:R
689:G
687:.
685:T
683:.
681:R
611:(
586:(
567:G
565:.
563:T
561:.
559:R
523:G
521:.
519:T
517:.
515:R
504:(
486:(
465:G
463:.
461:T
459:.
457:R
438:"
421:(
401:(
387:G
385:.
383:T
381:.
379:R
322:(
293:G
291:.
289:T
287:.
285:R
270:(
256:G
254:.
252:T
250:.
248:R
225:(
217:(
209:(
154:)
64:(
51:.
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
