Knowledge (XXG)

Template:Did you know nominations/World Trade Center (2001–present)

Source 📝

318: 387: 298: 252: 93: 226: 212:. "Against all odds, there is a World Trade Center again, and while it’s not quite finished (and some parts are still up in the air) it’s getting closer and closer to completion." 420: 259:, for ALT0 or ALT1, the sentence ending in "is still a hole in the ground" needs an inline citation (i.e., you need to copy over the one that ends the paragraph). -- 88: 36: 40: 352: 201: 183: 161: 357: 169: 17: 172:"If you continue going at the rate we're going, these buildings might not be finished until the Port's schedules, which is 2037" 44: 209: 143: 394:, ALT3 looks good. ALT3 hook ref verified and cited inline. Rest of review per Usernameunique. ALT3 good to go. 306: 264: 83: 159:... that Larry Silverstein, the developer of New York City's old World Trade Center, once projected that the 113: 118: 322: 377: 286: 240: 65: 302: 276: 260: 399: 330: 103: 368: 255:
GA, in time, long enough, sourced, no apparent copyvios, QPQ done. Preference for ALT2, but
391: 373: 282: 256: 236: 61: 414: 98: 317: 29:
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below.
395: 326: 386: 297: 35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as
371:. If that doesn't work, we can just go with ALT1. 00:19, 28 January 2018 (UTC) 251: 281:
Thanks for the review. I have done that. I also think ALT2 would be better.
123: 323:
WT:DYK#Prep 1 - ... that the new World Trade Center is still not complete?
47:), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. 356:
was once projected for completion in 36 years, longer than the
367:
I added a note to the new WTC's article. The 28 years are per
148: 321:
Returned from prep for further work per discussion at
108: 243:). Self-nominated at 19:09, 11 January 2018 (UTC). 8: 187:was not projected for completion until 2037? 49:No further edits should be made to this page 71: 421:Passed DYK nominations from January 2018 344:From that discussion, I suggested ALT3: 74: 366: 7: 235:Improved to Good Article status by 165:would not be completed until 2037? 24: 135:World Trade Center (2001–present) 45:Knowledge (XXG) talk:Did you know 18:Template:Did you know nominations 385: 316: 296: 250: 380:) 00:24, 28 January 2018 (UTC) 32:Please do not modify this page. 402:) 00:28, 28 January 2018 (UTC) 333:) 23:24, 27 January 2018 (UTC) 309:) 19:20, 12 January 2018 (UTC) 289:) 14:45, 12 January 2018 (UTC) 267:) 01:40, 12 January 2018 (UTC) 1: 68:) 06:42, 22 March 2018 (UTC) 181:... that at one point, the 37:this nomination's talk page 437: 119:Find sources (notability) 94:Earwig's Copyvio Detector 41:the article's talk page 353:new World Trade Center 205:is still not complete? 202:new World Trade Center 184:new World Trade Center 162:new World Trade Center 227:What a Beautiful Name 109:A Simple Word Counter 89:Reviewer instructions 114:Reviewers' template 244: 213: 191: 173: 132: 131: 428: 389: 358:original complex 320: 300: 280: 254: 234: 207: 190:Source: CBS News 189: 167: 72: 56:The result was: 34: 436: 435: 431: 430: 429: 427: 426: 425: 411: 410: 409: 350:: ... that the 274: 155: 153: 149:Article history 137: 128: 104:Character count 69: 30: 22: 21: 20: 12: 11: 5: 434: 432: 424: 423: 413: 412: 408: 407: 406: 405: 404: 403: 365:I also wrote: 363: 362: 361: 342: 341: 340: 339: 338: 337: 336: 335: 334: 311: 310: 303:Usernameunique 291: 290: 277:Usernameunique 269: 268: 261:Usernameunique 232: 231: 230: 229: 217: 216: 215: 214: 199:... that the 192: 152: 151: 146: 144:Back to T:TDYK 140: 138: 136: 133: 130: 129: 127: 126: 121: 116: 111: 106: 101: 96: 91: 86: 80: 77: 76: 54: 53: 25: 23: 15: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 433: 422: 419: 418: 416: 401: 397: 393: 388: 384: 383: 382: 381: 379: 375: 372: 370: 364: 359: 355: 354: 349: 346: 345: 343: 332: 328: 324: 319: 315: 314: 313: 312: 308: 304: 299: 295: 294: 293: 292: 288: 284: 278: 273: 272: 271: 270: 266: 262: 258: 253: 249: 248: 247: 246: 245: 242: 238: 228: 224: 221: 220: 219: 218: 211: 206: 204: 203: 196: 193: 188: 186: 185: 178: 175: 174: 171: 166: 164: 163: 157: 156: 150: 147: 145: 142: 141: 134: 125: 122: 120: 117: 115: 112: 110: 107: 105: 102: 100: 97: 95: 92: 90: 87: 85: 82: 81: 79: 78: 73: 70: 67: 63: 59: 52: 50: 46: 42: 38: 33: 27: 26: 19: 360:had existed? 351: 347: 233: 222: 200: 198: 194: 182: 180: 176: 160: 158: 57: 55: 48: 31: 28: 390:Thank you, 301:All set. -- 124:Hook length 75:DYK toolbox 392:Epicgenius 374:epicgenius 283:epicgenius 257:Epicgenius 237:Epicgenius 62:Cwmhiraeth 99:QPQ check 84:DYK check 415:Category 223:Reviewed 208:Source: 170:CBS News 168:Source: 58:promoted 396:Yoninah 369:WP:CALC 327:Yoninah 210:Curbed 16:< 400:talk 378:talk 348:ALT3 331:talk 307:talk 287:talk 265:talk 241:talk 195:ALT2 177:ALT1 66:talk 60:by 43:or 417:: 325:. 225:: 139:( 39:, 398:( 376:( 329:( 305:( 285:( 279:: 275:@ 263:( 239:( 197:: 179:: 154:) 64:( 51:.

Index

Template:Did you know nominations
this nomination's talk page
the article's talk page
Knowledge (XXG) talk:Did you know
Cwmhiraeth
talk
DYK check
Reviewer instructions
Earwig's Copyvio Detector
QPQ check
Character count
A Simple Word Counter
Reviewers' template
Find sources (notability)
Hook length
Back to T:TDYK
Article history
new World Trade Center
CBS News
new World Trade Center
new World Trade Center
Curbed
What a Beautiful Name
Epicgenius
talk

Epicgenius
Usernameunique
talk
Usernameunique

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.