33:
111:
are nominated by people who have worked closely on them. In this way, they can give reasoned replies to reviewers and be familiar enough with the sources to act on suggested improvements. Someone who has not worked on the article can not provide this input, so the nomination may continue until
78:
are nominated by people who have worked closely on them. In this way, they can give reasoned replies to reviewers and be familiar enough with the sources to act on suggested improvements. Someone who has not worked on the article can not provide this input, so the nomination may continue until
20:
are nominated by people who have worked closely on them. In this way, they can give reasoned replies to reviewers and be familiar enough with the sources to act on suggested improvements. Someone who has not worked on the article can not provide this input, so the nomination may continue until
21:
opposition to it becomes so overwhelming that the article is failed; this takes away time from reviewers. While the ] article is of reasonable quality, it is not yet of featured quality, and principal contributors must be consulted before a nomination, as required in the
240:
191:
48:
224:
187:
44:
116:
article is of reasonable quality, it is not yet of featured quality, and principal contributors must be consulted before a nomination, as required in the
83:
article is of reasonable quality, it is not yet of featured quality, and principal contributors must be consulted before a nomination, as required in the
117:
84:
22:
125:
52:
173:
108:
75:
17:
112:
opposition to it becomes so overwhelming that the article is failed; this takes away time from reviewers. While the
79:
opposition to it becomes so overwhelming that the article is failed; this takes away time from reviewers. While the
220:
181:
40:
121:
140:
162:
151:
113:
80:
177:
234:
27:
107:
I appreciate that you are acting in good faith, but it is best if
74:
I appreciate that you are acting in good faith, but it is best if
16:
I appreciate that you are acting in good faith, but it is best if
120:. You might consider first working the article up through
212:
204:
200:
197:Editors can experiment in this template's sandbox
8:
98:{{subst:FAC withdrawn|ArticleName|GAN=yes}}
241:Knowledge (XXG) featured content templates
92:{{subst:FAC withdrawn|ArticleName|PR=yes}}
118:featured article candidate instructions
85:featured article candidate instructions
23:featured article candidate instructions
7:
65:{{subst:FAC withdrawn|ArticleName}}
14:
31:
128:to prepare for its nomination.
1:
257:
182:Template:FAC withdrawn/doc
171:
225:Subpages of this template
219:Add categories to the
126:good article candidacy
36:Template documentation
109:featured articles
76:featured articles
18:featured articles
248:
216:
208:
195:
167:
161:
156:
150:
145:
139:
99:
93:
66:
56:
37:
35:
34:
256:
255:
251:
250:
249:
247:
246:
245:
231:
230:
229:
228:
218:
210:
198:
196:
185:
170:
165:
159:
154:
148:
143:
137:
134:
97:
91:
89:
64:
62:
57:
38:
32:
30:
12:
11:
5:
254:
252:
244:
243:
233:
232:
209:and testcases
169:
168:
157:
146:
133:
130:
61:
58:
29:
28:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
253:
242:
239:
238:
236:
226:
222:
214:
206:
202:
193:
189:
183:
179:
175:
174:documentation
164:
158:
153:
147:
142:
141:FLC withdrawn
136:
135:
131:
129:
127:
123:
119:
115:
110:
105:
104:
100:
96:
88:
86:
82:
77:
72:
71:
67:
59:
54:
50:
46:
42:
26:
24:
19:
166:}}
160:{{
155:}}
149:{{
144:}}
138:{{
106:
102:
101:
94:
90:
73:
69:
68:
63:
15:
178:transcluded
122:peer review
114:ArticleName
81:ArticleName
51:] [
47:] [
43:] [
172:The above
163:GARMessage
152:FARMessage
223:subpage.
103:Produces:
70:Produces:
235:Category
132:See also
203:|
192:history
190:|
49:history
217:pages.
213:create
205:mirror
201:create
180:from
60:Usage
55:]
53:purge
39:[
221:/doc
188:edit
124:and
45:edit
41:view
176:is
95:and
87:.
25:.
237::
184:.
227:.
215:)
211:(
207:)
199:(
194:)
186:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.