Knowledge

Template talk:Baháʼí sidebar

Source 📝

22: 1247:, and new redesign needs to be discussed before it can be used over such many pages. The proposed new template, in my mind, is definitely poorer, both aesthetically and functionally. Aesthetically because the colours and the symbol are washed out, which leads to be it functionally less useable, as it's harder to view and navigate through the various groups in the template. Such a large change needs to be discussed before being changed. Regards, -- 81: 736: 660: 555: 463: 376: 327: 282: 233: 174: 71: 53: 836: 404:
background, so I removed the link to the toccolours css class. I think it would be best to solicit comments rather than simply putting the proposal up. Please let me know what you think. I notice that the edit box at the bottom seems to come from the Tnavbar; I have no opinion on whether it should stay or go.
1638:
I have gone back to the old version of the template which did not have a relative width of 25%. Having a relative width is not good practice for a number of reasons. One is that for users who have widescreen screens, the template becomes very wide, and not comparable to all other vertical templates
1570:
Colour is what makes it distinctive, and makes the reader associate a template with a group of pages. The current colours are completely washed out. Having a standard template for all pages is not appropriate or desired, as you can notice from the wealth of different infoboxes for different sports.
149:
I noticed that there are two links on this that go th the same page: The Guardian and Shoghi Effendi. Now I realize that here is that there was one Guardian, and he was Shoghi Effendi, but the Guardian and Shoghi Effendi were two distinct entities. In 'God Passes By' Shoghi Effendi didn't refer to
1600:
I like the header graphic but otherwise much prefer the conservative space used in the current template. Honestly the primary revision of the template I'd contemplate is the ability to include page specific graphics - sometimes there is graphic on a page that would be nice rather than figuring out
811:
apologies. I was on the portal page as the most general place for a place to link the Baha'i Faith in fiction and the smallest most general corner at the bottom of the Baha'i Faith Series seemed to be that - until I found it was posted in dozens of pages (I thought you'ld have to go to the portal
189:
I agree that it's useful to have that information on Shoghi Effendi's page, but perhaps there could be a new page for the sake of accuracy and a balance reached between the two. Neither needs to be terribly exhaustive. As far as attacks, there was a note that I agree with that was left on my talk
361:
Nescott, I'm sorry but I disagree with you. It sounds much better to have "the series", and since there is only one series there's no grammatical issue. Saying "a series" implies that there are multiple series about the Baha'i Faith. I think if we resolve the whole "series" issue and change the
196:
An excellent idea to separate these articles. Right on-point. I anticipate that this will likely generate controversy with OBF if it deals with the succession. May I suggest that you deal with that in the article by only addressing the office, not addressing succession in detail (perhaps merely
403:
that looks quite nice. As I did I made a few small changes to the text which I hope will more accurately describe the links to which they refer. It was difficult to find a color of yellow that was nice; at any rate, it seemed that the yellow would look better against a white rather than a gray
631:
Sorry to come in a bit late here, but I'm wondering about crimson (#DC143C), seeing as how we're the 'companions of the Crimson Ark' and all. I suppose none of this color business is actually very important, but since we're on it I thought I'd add that. It may also be notable that, generally,
1750:
Among Baha'is the usage would never be "Part of a series on Baha'i Faith." There will invariably be a definite article in this context: "Part of a series on the Baha'i Faith." Has there been a relevant discussion on the wording for this template that someone can point me to? Is there any
1639:
in Knowledge. Even if the width is set to a specific value such as 160px, by removing the precise breaks, many of the article links do not start nor end on a line, making the navigating of links more difficult, and not easier, in addition to making more cluttering to the look. Regards, --
1615:
I made some changes to the template to make the colours parameters, but the line spacing of that template is just wrong, and this current template is just more readable and usable as way to navigate. Also based on comments on other templates you've tried to change such as Hinduism and
1722:. Most summary statements of the religion do not mention the two individuals that are being added; only one goes into the topic in detail are those two individuals mentioned, and only in small passing. You can take Peter's Smith's "Introduction to the Baha'i Faith" published by 1575:
page talking about it, but there is none. Instead of pushing your view of aesthetics on everyone, you should allow the template to have programmatically allowed colours for backgrounds and texts, so that the infrastructure you have created can be used appropriately. Regards, --
1601:
how to get the two to share space nicely. I don't know if it's possible or others want it but that's what I spend a modest amount of time wrestling with. The interspersed dots distract especially at the end of a row of entries. The colorless sectional devisions might be nicer.
920:
to get a feel for what the Bahá'í community is like. Without deviating from the fact that this is an encyclopedia, how can we include relevant concepts, as opposed to mere information, that adequately convey the new culture being established in the global community?
533:, and instead say "Baha'i Faith topics" or "Topics on the Baha'i Faith". There was a big issue about using the word "series" because it's technically not correct. (a series is an ordered list, the correct word would be 'set') The other idea is to use either color in 487:. They're just ideas and can be set aside. I hope they don't make it difficult to reach consensus, and I personally am happy with the current template. I like all four colors, and the green in particular, although the green might lead to confusion with the series on 1658:
While I've seen them, they are informal at best and strictly not "english equivalents". The "english equivalents" are the Book of Certitude and the Most Holy Book, or the Book of Laws. As for their usage here, I think the encyclopedic usage would favor the more
427:
If I understand the comments so far, the consensus seems to be that the current look is a good one and that the proposal would not be an improvement. The comments have been helpful, and I'm grateful to those who have had an opportunity to look at the proposal.
688: 1480:
Thank you for a review with actual comments. I'm working on new colours for the background so hopefully that will be fixed soon (once the right colour is found). I can change text size right away. OIn teh third point what do you mean by real estate?
1195:
state that the most common term (or in this case symbol) be used. Knowledge is not meant to be used as a way to push thought, but to follow, and since the nine-pointer star is what is generally used, that is the way Knowledge follows. Regards, --
1012:
My thoughts of the new design are that it's too busy, distracts the reader, and hides the links. The purpose of the template is a navigation template, and the new design precisely removes its usability by removing its simplicity. Regards, --
812:
page, and then go all the way to the bottom....) Anyway, I took it out after I saw that it was so often used.... Then I tried to figure out how to get it to show in the ..in fiction page and that still stumps me but it seemed a good idea.....--
680: 163:
I understand what you mean. But I think explaining the guardianship under Shoghi Effendi's page would be helpful because his page is pretty bare. And making a separate page might invite attacks. Remember its a sensitive issue.
950:
Remember, this is an encyclopedia, not a vehicle to promote the Baha'i Faith. When reliable third-party sources document a new culture, only then can information be changed to reflect that in a neutral fashion. Regards, --
1714:, there are some reversions here, which are disputed at best, so the discussion should happen here before we get into an edit war. The template is meant to be a summary of the main aspects of a religion as defined by 892:. Isn't that important enough? It is also an large and informative page with the Bahá'í category, which is now indirectly accessible on the Main Page by clicking through on the word 'Pilgrimage' in the 1187:
Because it is the symbol that is most commonly used. Look at bahai.com, bahai.us, and generally any other Baha'i associated website, book, or otherwise, and the nine-pointed star is used. Knowledge
1556:
Thanks for the explanation Cuñado. Jeff3000 I dont understand everyone obsession with colour changes. THe whole point of a standard template it to stop have so many random colours for each infobox.
573:
I think at this point, all of the choices are better than the current one (mainly because of the subheading font). I would just not pick green, as that is the Islam template cover. --
1054:
there is a debate whether the template should advance to a new state of loveliness or stay in its original plain format, the new format wins out, if it is logical that is. There are
1785: 1172:
Is there a reason why the nine-pointed star is the symbol for all of these articles? I understand that it is more commonly used but isn't the five-pointed star the official symbol?
1790: 1795: 272:
I had two reasons: one is that it made the template twice as wide as it was (a huge asthetic problem), and two is that those kinds of links usually go in the actual article.
1081:
I really don't agree. The new template is completely too distracting. UI design across software GUIs and physical controls always tends towards simplicity. Regards, --
317:
I really don't like the edit box that was added to the bottom of the template. It takes up extra space and it's not really necessary. Would anyone object if I remove it?
1007:
that a new look went through much discussion before one was decided upon and a newer design needs to go through the same sort of discussion to come to achieve consensus.
153:
So basically I think it would be ideal to link 'The Guardian' to another or a new article about the Guardianship. Perhaps I'll do that in the next couple of minutes.
1688:
I just found it odd that an english wikipeia has an arabic transliterated version of the name. But as you both are experienced editors, i will trust your judgement.
197:
pointing to the Will and Testament of `Abdu'l-Bahá), and directing further inquiry to Bahá'í divisions? Even with that you may still have to bird-dog the article.
107: 982:
I've redone the Bahai template to make it more eye appealing and space saving. Please raise any objections of why the remake shouldn't be posted before removal.
889:
Okay, but 'Abdu'l-Bahá states that it is “obligatory” to visit these places “if one can afford it and is able to do so, and if no obstacle stands in one’s way”.
1262:
I agree with the current version that Jeff3000 reverted to. It comes down to aesthetics and I think it looks much better, being skinnier and easier to read.
450:
I feel both these two are great, better than the current one. Both colours are fine, but if you want me to choose, let it be for the purple one on the left.
1495:
If the template shall replace the current one, the colours used in the template should be programmable so that the colours can be maintained. Regards, --
826:
I suggest removing the list of teachings. In my opinion, it would make the template more NPOV, and there is already a link under "see also" for teachings.
756: 103: 94: 58: 916:
While many facts that are interesting from a historical perspective are in the Bahá'í pages, many individuals, especially college students, use the
542: 530: 529:
I have an idea, and it's just an idea. Actually two separate ideas. First, to solve the wording issue, we could re-format it to look like the
781:
Somehow I prefer the so-called fat star as well. I realize that the debate happened four weeks ago but I thought I'd throw in my two cents.
726:
I added the pointy star to compare. I prefer the current, more pointy star. Also, the fatter star does not have a transparent background.
890: 1616:
Zoroastrianism, colours are important and your unilaterally trying to change everything is not gaining acceptance. Regards, --
794:
I hope you get my point. The so-called fat star has a lot more harmony in it. The current one looks somehow aggressive to me. --
880:
I'm not sure that it's necessary. I don't object, but do wonder why it'd be important. It's not a "pillar" of the religion.
816: 1192: 538: 453:
I don't see a problem with any of those. Although I like the shorter wording on the top "part of the series". Whatever.
33: 632:
Baha'u'llah's books are printed in crimson, The Bab's in green, Abdu'l-Baha's in blue, and Shoghi Effendi's in brown. -
1244: 714:
Hi Jeff! Fat sounds funny ;-) Being fat is a matter of size. I would use it a little smaller than the current one. --
852: 385: 1239:, and thus the new template gets included in a large number of pages. The old template had been designed through 491:
or the series on Baha'i literature. In all four, more of a margin between the links and the border would be nice.
1755: 415: 867: 1468: 1177: 150:
himself regarding noteworthy historical developments, but rather to the Guardian as being the participator.
1233: 1223: 512: 438: 111: 1711: 715: 696: 343: 39: 1770: 1739: 1697: 1683: 1668: 1648: 1625: 1610: 1585: 1565: 1535: 1504: 1490: 1472: 1294: 1276: 1256: 1205: 1181: 1161: 1141: 1111: 1090: 1076: 1037: 1022: 993: 976: 960: 945: 930: 900: 884: 874: 855: 845: 798: 785: 772: 763: 745: 718: 709: 699: 669: 636: 619: 598: 577: 564: 523: 495: 472: 445: 432: 422: 408: 350: 336: 304: 291: 261: 242: 183: 157: 99: 1726:, one of the most reliable publishers, as an example. Warm regards, -- 23:05, 15 October 2013 (UTC) 591: 534: 516: 508: 484: 480: 300:
Didn't realise that - it looked ok on my version. I've added the link to teh main BF article instead
1693: 1561: 1530: 1486: 1290: 1271: 1240: 1156: 1106: 1000: 989: 917: 396: 1766: 1735: 1679: 1664: 1644: 1621: 1606: 1581: 1500: 1464: 1252: 1201: 1173: 1086: 1018: 956: 941: 926: 881: 840: 740: 664: 647: 559: 467: 380: 331: 286: 237: 178: 1715: 1137: 1132:
Is there a reason why Martha Root is on this template, and not for example Rúhíyyih Khanum?
1071: 1032: 479:
Thanks for the nice proposals, Jeff3000. The blue one has inspired four more possibilities:
441:. They are based on Modify's proposal, but have a smaller width, and different colours. -- 896:, or on the word 'Bahá'í World Centre' in the section Bahá'í administration. May I add it? 86: 102:
on Knowledge. If you would like to participate, you can edit this template, or visit the
1689: 1557: 1522: 1482: 1286: 1263: 1216: 1148: 1098: 985: 752: 400: 1066:, which never really holds ground. Aesthetics and usability wins out, rather than the 98:, a coordinated attempt to increase the quality and quantity of information about the 1779: 1762: 1731: 1675: 1660: 1640: 1617: 1602: 1577: 1572: 1496: 1248: 1197: 1188: 1082: 1014: 952: 937: 922: 827: 813: 782: 769: 751:
Hello everybody! Tastes differ. German and Russian Knowledge is using the "fat one":
727: 706: 651: 633: 595: 574: 546: 520: 454: 442: 419: 367: 347: 318: 301: 273: 258: 224: 213: 165: 154: 1719: 1133: 897: 871: 616: 267:
Sorry I didn't mean to be insultive. I should have left an explanation somewhere.
1752: 795: 760: 735: 687: 659: 554: 492: 462: 429: 405: 375: 326: 281: 232: 173: 1097:
I agree with Jeff3000. I definitely prefer the current template over this one.
1070:
philosophy. You can see this taking place across all templates on Knowledge. --
80: 76: 695:
Hi! I prefer this star. IMO it is much more friendly than the other one. --
679: 545:. That way we could keep a theme running. I like the blue and the green. 1571:
If Knowledge wanted standard templates for everything, there would be a
206:
Thank you for taking this on. MARussellPESE 17:56, 22 October 2005 (UTC)
835: 366:
you need to get some better consensus before insisting on changing it.
362:
wording this won't be an issue. For something that has been around for
70: 52: 1460:
This is about 50% wider than the original, so it sucks up real estate.
1454:
Very poor contrast between "Baha'i" and the background in the title.
1285:
Just so everyone can see this is what the template would look like;
1751:
objection to adding "the"? I recall it being there at one point.
893: 686: 678: 488: 519:. As for the cellspacing, I'm not sure which one is better. -- 1674:
Agree wiht Smkolins. The current wording is best. Regards, --
594:. If no one comments in the next day or so, I'll switch it. -- 15: 1147:
Personally I think Martha Root played a more important role.
1031:
I think, without a doubt, this template should be adopted. --
936:
Is there any basis to decide what any group is looking for?--
646:
Might I suggest someone also change the color and format of
106:, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the 1307:|width = 18em |bold = no |header1 = <center: --> 1050:
And just to boost the morale of the team promoting this,
705:
This star looks fat to me. I prefer the current one. --
507:
They look good. My favourite colour is the blue one in
1521:
By real estate he means make it as skinny as you can.
110:. If you are new to editing Knowledge visit the 1191:, and it's sub pages, (for example the one one 590:Everyone ok with going with the blue one from 1303:{{Religion |religion = Bahá'í Faith |image = 346:to better understand why it's there. Thanks. 8: 511:. My favourite text at the beginning is at 870:in the 'See also' section. Any objection? 47: 32:does not require a rating on Knowledge's 515:. My favourite subheading fonts are at 342:Thank you for asking Cuñado, please see 223:Sounds like a smart guy, or maybe girl. 1128:Why Martha Root i.s.o. Rúhíyyih Khanum? 768:So far two to one for current star. -- 399:of the template modeled on the one for 212:Let me know what you think about this. 114:to become familiar with the guidelines. 49: 1004: 999:First of all such large changes need 437:Ok, how bout one of two templates at 92:This template is within the scope of 21: 19: 7: 1786:Template-Class Bahá'í Faith articles 1791:NA-importance Bahá'í Faith articles 1372:Notable individuals</center: --> 1317:{{·}} ] |header3 = <center: --> 38:It is of interest to the following 120:Knowledge:WikiProject Bahá'í Faith 14: 1796:WikiProject Bahá'í Faith articles 123:Template:WikiProject Bahá'í Faith 1746:Part of a series on Baha'i Faith 1229:to the new template you created 834: 806: 734: 658: 553: 543:Template:Apostles of Bahá'u'lláh 461: 374: 325: 280: 231: 172: 79: 69: 51: 20: 1308:Central figures</center: --> 866:I would like to have a link to 1: 1318:Key scripture</center: --> 1206:23:20, 30 December 2008 (UTC) 1182:21:39, 30 December 2008 (UTC) 1112:15:30, 10 November 2008 (UTC) 1091:14:14, 10 November 2008 (UTC) 1077:06:56, 10 November 2008 (UTC) 1038:06:51, 10 November 2008 (UTC) 305:13:30, 23 November 2005 (UTC) 292:00:04, 22 November 2005 (UTC) 262:23:59, 21 November 2005 (UTC) 1740:00:48, 16 October 2013 (UTC) 1626:01:44, 20 January 2009 (UTC) 1611:21:51, 19 January 2009 (UTC) 1586:21:02, 19 January 2009 (UTC) 1566:20:42, 19 January 2009 (UTC) 1536:19:15, 19 January 2009 (UTC) 1505:16:00, 19 January 2009 (UTC) 1491:15:38, 19 January 2009 (UTC) 1473:18:53, 18 January 2009 (UTC) 1336:Institutions</center: --> 1295:16:07, 18 January 2009 (UTC) 1277:20:56, 17 January 2009 (UTC) 1257:18:02, 11 January 2009 (UTC) 1219:unilaterally redirected the 856:08:31, 17 January 2007 (UTC) 846:03:56, 17 January 2007 (UTC) 537:, and use the same color on 243:16:58, 24 October 2005 (UTC) 184:19:12, 23 October 2005 (UTC) 158:16:39, 22 October 2005 (UTC) 1397:|header18 = <center: --> 1371:|header15 = <center: --> 1353:|header12 = <center: --> 1335:|header7 = <center: --> 1162:00:16, 30 August 2008 (UTC) 1142:21:05, 28 August 2008 (UTC) 817:03:46, 25 August 2006 (UTC) 799:19:05, 13 August 2006 (UTC) 786:03:00, 11 August 2006 (UTC) 257:Why has this been deleted? 1812: 1771:19:41, 5 August 2017 (UTC) 1756:04:42, 5 August 2017 (UTC) 1698:03:30, 4 August 2010 (UTC) 190:page that addresses this: 1724:Cambrige University Press 1684:16:05, 25 July 2010 (UTC) 1669:12:30, 25 July 2010 (UTC) 1649:01:51, 15 June 2009 (UTC) 1212:New template by The Quill 1023:22:05, 15 July 2008 (UTC) 994:21:31, 15 July 2008 (UTC) 969:Remodel of Bahai Template 773:20:38, 20 July 2006 (UTC) 764:20:32, 20 July 2006 (UTC) 746:20:16, 20 July 2006 (UTC) 719:18:30, 20 July 2006 (UTC) 710:18:21, 20 July 2006 (UTC) 700:18:17, 20 July 2006 (UTC) 670:18:05, 15 June 2006 (UTC) 637:01:35, 23 June 2006 (UTC) 620:16:27, 14 June 2006 (UTC) 599:14:38, 10 June 2006 (UTC) 531:African American template 356: 64: 46: 1398:See also</center: --> 1301: 961:21:38, 2 July 2008 (UTC) 946:20:50, 2 July 2008 (UTC) 931:19:59, 2 July 2008 (UTC) 578:02:55, 8 June 2006 (UTC) 565:02:03, 8 June 2006 (UTC) 524:19:56, 7 June 2006 (UTC) 496:19:30, 7 June 2006 (UTC) 473:23:58, 6 June 2006 (UTC) 446:03:43, 6 June 2006 (UTC) 433:16:35, 5 June 2006 (UTC) 423:14:50, 3 June 2006 (UTC) 416:User talk:Modify/Sandbox 409:12:34, 3 June 2006 (UTC) 386:04:04, 25 May 2006 (UTC) 351:00:14, 25 May 2006 (UTC) 337:23:12, 24 May 2006 (UTC) 95:WikiProject Bahá'í Faith 1710:As with my comments on 1457:Body text is too small. 1354:History</center: --> 901:16:47, 4 May 2007 (UTC) 885:18:11, 1 May 2007 (UTC) 875:12:31, 1 May 2007 (UTC) 853:Christian Edward Gruber 807:Bahá'í Faith in fiction 1168:Why Nine-Pointed Star? 1058:editors who say it is 1003:. You can see above 692: 684: 513:User:Jeff3000/Sandbox2 439:User:Jeff3000/Sandbox2 1745: 894:section about the Báb 690: 682: 539:Template:Bahá'í books 126:Bahá'í Faith articles 1712:Talk:Baha'i calendar 1331:{{·}} |data6 = 592:User:Modify/Sandbox2 535:User:Modify/Sandbox2 517:User:Modify/Sandbox2 509:User:Modify/Sandbox2 485:User:Modify/Sandbox3 481:User:Modify/Sandbox2 395:I've put together a 145:Specifics of Linking 1761:Makes sense to me. 1427:{{·}} |data21 = 1415:{{·}} |data20 = 1367:{{·}} |data14 = 1349:{{·}} |data11 = 1345:{{·}} |data10 = 1341:{{·}} |data9 = 1327:{{·}} |data5 = 1385:{{·}} |data17 = 1193:naming conventions 1005:#Proposed new look 753:de:Portal:Religion 693: 685: 34:content assessment 1245:different options 757:ru:Портал:Религия 683:This star please! 648:Template:Baha'i-2 397:proposed revision 391:Proposed new look 142: 141: 138: 137: 134: 133: 1803: 1720:reliable sources 1533: 1527: 1430: 1426: 1422: 1418: 1414: 1410: 1406: 1402: 1396: 1392: 1388: 1384: 1380: 1376: 1370: 1366: 1362: 1358: 1352: 1348: 1344: 1340: 1334: 1330: 1326: 1322: 1316: 1312: 1306: 1274: 1268: 1238: 1232: 1228: 1222: 1159: 1153: 1109: 1103: 1074: 1035: 981: 975: 851:+1. I agree. -- 843: 838: 832: 743: 738: 732: 667: 662: 656: 615:Please do so. - 562: 557: 551: 470: 465: 459: 414:Posted reply at 383: 378: 372: 334: 329: 323: 289: 284: 278: 240: 235: 229: 181: 176: 170: 128: 127: 124: 121: 118: 89: 84: 83: 73: 66: 65: 55: 48: 25: 24: 23: 16: 1811: 1810: 1806: 1805: 1804: 1802: 1801: 1800: 1776: 1775: 1748: 1708: 1656: 1654:shortened names 1636: 1573:Manual of Style 1531: 1523: 1433: 1432: 1428: 1424: 1420: 1416: 1412: 1408: 1404: 1400: 1394: 1390: 1386: 1382: 1378: 1374: 1368: 1364: 1360: 1356: 1350: 1346: 1342: 1338: 1332: 1328: 1324: 1320: 1314: 1310: 1304: 1272: 1264: 1236: 1230: 1226: 1220: 1214: 1189:Manual of Style 1170: 1157: 1149: 1130: 1107: 1099: 1072: 1064:too distracting 1033: 979: 973: 971: 914: 864: 841: 828: 824: 809: 741: 728: 677: 665: 652: 644: 560: 547: 541:, and likewise 468: 455: 393: 381: 368: 359: 332: 319: 315: 287: 274: 255: 238: 225: 179: 166: 147: 125: 122: 119: 116: 115: 87:Religion portal 85: 78: 12: 11: 5: 1809: 1807: 1799: 1798: 1793: 1788: 1778: 1777: 1774: 1773: 1747: 1744: 1743: 1742: 1718:as defined by 1707: 1704: 1703: 1702: 1701: 1700: 1655: 1652: 1635: 1632: 1631: 1630: 1629: 1628: 1598: 1597: 1596: 1595: 1594: 1593: 1592: 1591: 1590: 1589: 1588: 1545: 1544: 1543: 1542: 1541: 1540: 1539: 1538: 1512: 1511: 1510: 1509: 1508: 1507: 1462: 1461: 1458: 1455: 1451: 1450: 1446: 1445: 1441: 1440: 1302: 1300: 1299: 1298: 1297: 1280: 1279: 1217:User:The Quill 1213: 1210: 1209: 1208: 1169: 1166: 1165: 1164: 1129: 1126: 1125: 1124: 1123: 1122: 1121: 1120: 1119: 1118: 1117: 1116: 1115: 1114: 1043: 1042: 1041: 1040: 1026: 1025: 1009: 1008: 970: 967: 966: 965: 964: 963: 913: 910: 908: 906: 905: 904: 903: 863: 860: 859: 858: 823: 820: 808: 805: 804: 803: 802: 801: 789: 788: 778: 777: 776: 775: 724: 723: 722: 721: 676: 673: 643: 642:Other template 640: 629: 628: 627: 626: 625: 624: 623: 622: 606: 605: 604: 603: 602: 601: 583: 582: 581: 580: 568: 567: 505: 504: 503: 502: 501: 500: 499: 498: 477: 476: 475: 401:Zoroastrianism 392: 389: 358: 355: 354: 353: 314: 311: 310: 309: 308: 307: 295: 294: 269: 268: 254: 251: 250: 249: 248: 247: 246: 245: 210: 209: 208: 207: 201: 200: 199: 198: 187: 186: 146: 143: 140: 139: 136: 135: 132: 131: 129: 91: 90: 74: 62: 61: 56: 44: 43: 37: 26: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 1808: 1797: 1794: 1792: 1789: 1787: 1784: 1783: 1781: 1772: 1768: 1764: 1760: 1759: 1758: 1757: 1754: 1741: 1737: 1733: 1729: 1728: 1727: 1725: 1721: 1717: 1713: 1705: 1699: 1695: 1691: 1687: 1686: 1685: 1681: 1677: 1673: 1672: 1671: 1670: 1666: 1662: 1653: 1651: 1650: 1646: 1642: 1633: 1627: 1623: 1619: 1614: 1613: 1612: 1608: 1604: 1599: 1587: 1583: 1579: 1574: 1569: 1568: 1567: 1563: 1559: 1555: 1554: 1553: 1552: 1551: 1550: 1549: 1548: 1547: 1546: 1537: 1534: 1528: 1526: 1520: 1519: 1518: 1517: 1516: 1515: 1514: 1513: 1506: 1502: 1498: 1494: 1493: 1492: 1488: 1484: 1479: 1478: 1477: 1476: 1475: 1474: 1470: 1466: 1465:MARussellPESE 1459: 1456: 1453: 1452: 1448: 1447: 1443: 1442: 1438: 1437: 1436: 1296: 1292: 1288: 1284: 1283: 1282: 1281: 1278: 1275: 1269: 1267: 1261: 1260: 1259: 1258: 1254: 1250: 1246: 1242: 1235: 1234:Bahá'í‎ Faith 1225: 1218: 1211: 1207: 1203: 1199: 1194: 1190: 1186: 1185: 1184: 1183: 1179: 1175: 1174:Supergeek1694 1167: 1163: 1160: 1154: 1152: 1146: 1145: 1144: 1143: 1139: 1135: 1127: 1113: 1110: 1104: 1102: 1096: 1095: 1094: 1093: 1092: 1088: 1084: 1080: 1079: 1078: 1075: 1069: 1068:plain as Jane 1065: 1061: 1057: 1053: 1049: 1048: 1047: 1046: 1045: 1044: 1039: 1036: 1030: 1029: 1028: 1027: 1024: 1020: 1016: 1011: 1010: 1006: 1002: 998: 997: 996: 995: 991: 987: 983: 978: 968: 962: 958: 954: 949: 948: 947: 943: 939: 935: 934: 933: 932: 928: 924: 919: 911: 909: 902: 899: 895: 891: 888: 887: 886: 883: 882:MARussellPESE 879: 878: 877: 876: 873: 869: 861: 857: 854: 850: 849: 848: 847: 844: 837: 833: 831: 821: 819: 818: 815: 800: 797: 793: 792: 791: 790: 787: 784: 780: 779: 774: 771: 767: 766: 765: 762: 758: 754: 750: 749: 748: 747: 744: 737: 733: 731: 720: 717: 716:84.162.78.205 713: 712: 711: 708: 704: 703: 702: 701: 698: 697:84.162.78.205 689: 681: 674: 672: 671: 668: 661: 657: 655: 649: 641: 639: 638: 635: 621: 618: 614: 613: 612: 611: 610: 609: 608: 607: 600: 597: 593: 589: 588: 587: 586: 585: 584: 579: 576: 572: 571: 570: 569: 566: 563: 556: 552: 550: 544: 540: 536: 532: 528: 527: 526: 525: 522: 518: 514: 510: 497: 494: 490: 486: 482: 478: 474: 471: 464: 460: 458: 452: 451: 449: 448: 447: 444: 440: 436: 435: 434: 431: 426: 425: 424: 421: 417: 413: 412: 411: 410: 407: 402: 398: 390: 388: 387: 384: 377: 373: 371: 365: 352: 349: 345: 341: 340: 339: 338: 335: 328: 324: 322: 312: 306: 303: 299: 298: 297: 296: 293: 290: 283: 279: 277: 271: 270: 266: 265: 264: 263: 260: 253:Wikinews link 252: 244: 241: 234: 230: 228: 222: 221: 220: 219: 218: 217: 216: 215: 205: 204: 203: 202: 195: 194: 193: 192: 191: 185: 182: 175: 171: 169: 162: 161: 160: 159: 156: 151: 144: 130: 113: 109: 105: 101: 97: 96: 88: 82: 77: 75: 72: 68: 67: 63: 60: 57: 54: 50: 45: 41: 35: 31: 27: 18: 17: 1749: 1723: 1709: 1657: 1637: 1524: 1463: 1444:Nice graphic 1434: 1399:|data19 = 1373:|data16 = 1355:|data13 = 1337:|data8 = 1319:|data4 = 1309:|data2 = 1265: 1241:WP:CONSENSUS 1215: 1171: 1150: 1131: 1100: 1067: 1063: 1060:too colorful 1059: 1055: 1051: 984: 972: 915: 907: 865: 829: 825: 810: 729: 725: 694: 691:Current star 653: 645: 630: 548: 506: 456: 394: 369: 363: 360: 357:'the' vs 'a' 320: 316: 275: 256: 226: 211: 188: 167: 152: 148: 117:Bahá'í Faith 112:welcome page 104:project page 100:Baháʼí Faith 93: 59:Bahá'í Faith 40:WikiProjects 29: 918:Baha'i page 1780:Categories 1716:notability 1706:Reversions 1435:Comments: 1243:over many 912:Activities 868:Pilgrimage 862:Pilgrimage 675:Other Star 108:discussion 1730:agreed -- 1690:Someone65 1558:The Quill 1483:The Quill 1449:Negative: 1439:Positive: 1287:The Quill 1052:everytime 1001:consensus 986:Sikandros 822:Teachings 344:this talk 1763:Smkolins 1732:Smkolins 1676:Jeff3000 1661:Smkolins 1641:Jeff3000 1618:Jeff3000 1603:Smkolins 1578:Jeff3000 1497:Jeff3000 1249:Jeff3000 1198:Jeff3000 1083:Jeff3000 1015:Jeff3000 977:Bahá'í 2 953:Jeff3000 938:Smkolins 814:Smkolins 783:Iainsona 770:Jeff3000 707:Jeff3000 634:LambaJan 596:Jeff3000 575:Jeff3000 521:Jeff3000 443:Jeff3000 420:Jeff3000 348:Netscott 313:edit box 302:AndrewRT 259:AndrewRT 214:LambaJan 155:LambaJan 30:template 1659:formal. 1389:{{·}} 1381:{{·}} 1224:Bahá'í‎ 1134:Wiki-uk 898:Wiki-uk 872:Wiki-uk 617:Wiki-uk 1753:modify 1525:Cuñado 1423:{{·}} 1419:{{·}} 1411:{{·}} 1407:{{·}} 1403:{{·}} 1393:{{·}} 1377:{{·}} 1363:{{·}} 1359:{{·}} 1323:{{·}} 1313:{{·}} 1266:Cuñado 1151:Cuñado 1101:Cuñado 1073:Enzuru 1056:always 1034:Enzuru 830:Cuñado 796:Mipago 761:Mipago 730:Cuñado 654:Cuñado 549:Cuñado 493:modify 457:Cuñado 430:modify 406:modify 370:Cuñado 321:Cuñado 276:Cuñado 227:Cuñado 168:Cuñado 36:scale. 1634:Width 489:Islam 364:years 28:This 1767:talk 1736:talk 1694:talk 1680:talk 1665:talk 1645:talk 1622:talk 1607:talk 1582:talk 1562:talk 1532:Talk 1529:☼ - 1501:talk 1487:talk 1469:talk 1291:talk 1273:Talk 1270:☼ - 1253:talk 1202:talk 1178:talk 1158:Talk 1155:☼ - 1138:talk 1108:Talk 1105:☼ - 1087:talk 1019:talk 990:talk 957:talk 942:talk 927:talk 923:Leif 842:Talk 755:and 742:Talk 666:Talk 561:Talk 483:and 469:Talk 382:Talk 333:Talk 288:Talk 239:Talk 180:Talk 1431:}} 418:-- 1782:: 1769:) 1738:) 1696:) 1682:) 1667:) 1647:) 1624:) 1609:) 1584:) 1564:) 1503:) 1489:) 1471:) 1293:) 1255:) 1237:}} 1231:{{ 1227:}} 1221:{{ 1204:) 1180:) 1140:) 1089:) 1062:, 1021:) 992:) 980:}} 974:{{ 959:) 944:) 929:) 839:- 759:-- 739:- 663:- 650:? 558:- 466:- 379:- 330:- 285:- 236:- 177:- 1765:( 1734:( 1692:( 1678:( 1663:( 1643:( 1620:( 1605:( 1580:( 1560:( 1499:( 1485:( 1467:( 1429:] 1425:] 1421:] 1417:] 1413:] 1409:] 1405:] 1401:] 1395:] 1391:] 1387:] 1383:] 1379:] 1375:] 1369:] 1365:] 1361:] 1357:] 1351:] 1347:] 1343:] 1339:] 1333:] 1329:] 1325:] 1321:] 1315:] 1311:] 1305:] 1289:( 1251:( 1200:( 1176:( 1136:( 1085:( 1017:( 988:( 955:( 940:( 925:( 42::

Index

content assessment
WikiProjects
WikiProject icon
Bahá'í Faith
WikiProject icon
icon
Religion portal
WikiProject Bahá'í Faith
Baháʼí Faith
project page
discussion
welcome page
LambaJan
16:39, 22 October 2005 (UTC)
Cuñado

Talk
19:12, 23 October 2005 (UTC)
LambaJan
Cuñado

Talk
16:58, 24 October 2005 (UTC)
AndrewRT
23:59, 21 November 2005 (UTC)
Cuñado

Talk
00:04, 22 November 2005 (UTC)
AndrewRT

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.