1218:" links to a Knowledge (XXG) article, it shouldn't cause any confusion (alternatively, we could use something like "Customs?"). I don't think that "Scheduled Commercial" is a good idea, because, again, commercial aviation is much bigger than just passenger service (and you can also have scheduled cargo flights); "Scheduled passenger service" is really what we're trying to get at here -- in other words, can you buy an airline ticket to this airport?
31:
1367:
opened; I've left the parameters in the articles themselves, though, so the information is easy to put back if people want to. I like the other changes suggested above, but haven't made them yet; in addition, we might want to consider a field indicating whether the airport has scheduled airline passenger service, since that's something
Knowledge (XXG) readers are likely to care about.
828:-- I haven't worked with Knowledge (XXG) templates before, but it looks like a much better idea than cutting and pasting all of the table markup. It would probably be best to use named parameters rather than positional ones, to make it more robust. Will we be able to use repeatable elements, like runways, though?
1128:. I looked at a few more examples, and they're all over the place like that. Still, I think that this is information that the average (non-pilot) reader will care about, much more than runway lengths and headings. Perhaps there's some way to make it work, even if we have to measure some distances ourselves.
1366:
I've added elevation MSL and made changes in all articles that use the template. I also removed operator from the template, since it isn't very important information and created a lot of red links (do we really need a
Knowledge (XXG) article for every local airport authority?), and removed the year
1083:
But that isnt uncommon. Many airports are located outside a major city, and often takes the name of the town it is located in or is nearby to, yet was built to serve that major city primarily (Narita: Tokyo, Gatwick: London, Tacoma: Seattle are just a few egs), and it does not really present a major
356:
I would suggest putting the airport codes closer to the top of the infobox for quick reference — they are, after all, unique identifiers just like the airport's name. The general public has enough exposure to IATA codes (compared to, let's say, runway information) that they shouldn't wonder too much
1558:
Runway surfaces are named by their two headings (usually magnetic, but sometimes true) in tens of degrees. So a runway surface that extends directly east (90°) to west (270°) would be named "09/27", a runway that extends south (180°) to north (360°) would be named "18/36", and so on. I'm not sure
390:
I would suggest using a template for the latitude/longitude specification, so that one automagically gets a link to a map service. In the current form latitude and longitude are split between two table boxes - I would suggest having them both in the same box, because there is some trickery involved
373:
The infobox as it currently stays doesn't address data aging, most notably the magnetic variation and the associated runway re-numbering. Also, rwy lengths can change, rwys added/removed etc. Probably, a traditional (in aviation) "not for navigation" label is appropriate, although in general there
930:
I think that the distance is usually to the city centre -- LaGuardia, for instance, is listed in the AFD as "4 E" (i.e. 4 nautical miles east) of New York City, which is more-or-less the distance to
Manhattan. In cases where the airport is in the centre, you can use "ADJ" (adjacent) or "0 km" or
790:
I like the look of the infobox; however, I wonder whether we should be using this kind of thing too much in a collaborative project like the
Knowledge (XXG). The markup for the table is both brittle (it's bound to break during editing and cut-and-paste) and obfuscatory (the markup overwhelms and
1252:
What do you mean by a "commercial" airport, though? Do you mean that it has any kind of commercial aviation (say, crop dusters or banner tow), or only that it has scheduled passenger service? If it's the latter, how would you classify the tens of thousands of civilian, public airports in North
802:
I acknowledge that a bulleted list of airport data is much uglier than a nicely-done infobox, but the bulleted list is easier to edit, and that should probably win out here. On balance, I'd recommend against the infobox -- it's better to be ugly and accessible than beautiful and inaccessible.
1448:. MSL and ASL have very different meanings and ASL is the most correct. MSL is used only at an airport to refer to the reduction to sea level of the station pressure and then really only by weather forcasters. ASL would be used to refer to the elevation of objects (runway, aircraft, etc).
835:
The current plan is to have 3 templates. 1 - main template with name etc. 2- a runway template for a single runway. Can be used multiple times 3 - a stats template (I am actually wavering to have this a seperate template for the infobox, inline rather than the side) Does this help?
1253:
America alone that do not have scheduled passenger service? We're best sticking with the standard terminology, I think: "public", "private", and "military". That's the way they're described in official publications and charts that we'll have to use as sources.
791:
obscures the content) -- it will certainly scare away any but the most experienced
Knowledge (XXG) users from trying to edit a page. The idea of Wiki markup (either traditional or MediaWiki) is to stay out of the way of the content; when you edit an article like
209:
Perhaps list other services avalible at the airport, transportation to/fro, copenhagen airport for example has a train which goes under it, you walk out from an international flight and take a train, list modes of transportation to/fro. Also things like security
1058:
Before we remove them...why not discuss this further first? I do not think it is a wise idea to remove them. Distance from the city centre is quite a basic and commonly found info, and it does speak volumes on the accesibility of an airport to its catchment
1084:
case for concern. But for clarity's sake, how about in the format "Distance to CBD: XXX km/miles (City name)", which can then also allow us to add multiple city distances since some (thankfully not many) airports do serve several large cities at once?--
257:
I suggest that in the Quick Info section, the 'Opened' slot be changed as 1 July was the date when operations in the airport commenced, and it is not the official opening date, which is 29 December 1981. (Info from the Changi
Airport homepage)
360:
Also, many airports in Canada, including all the major ones, are owned and operated by separate entities. I 'm really not sure if it would be a good idea to include an "owned by" line in the infobox, but it's worth thinking about.
1603:
A question on how you want the runway designation/bearing listed. The headings are derived from rounding the bearing so do you want just the designation, just the bearing or both? As an example the bearings for the runway in
377:
For the US airports I would also add a relevant airnav link (I don't know if it's OK to give such a wide endorsement to a commercial country-based site, but it is widely recognized by the aviators as a valuable resource.
1385:
The headings should be sentence case just like article headings. Thus 'Type of
Airport' would become 'Type of airport', 'Number of Passengers' would become 'Number of passengers', and 'Quick Info' would become 'Quick
1166:
We need need a standard set of types. I propose the following: Commerical vs. General
Aviation / Public vs Private / Domestic vs. International, where each airport would have one of all three of those types.
1566:
09/27 is actually two runways, runway 09 if you're landing or taking off eastbound, and runway 27 if you're landing or taking off westbound. They can even be different lengths if one of them has a displaced
344:
Any chance the
Latitude: 33° 56.4' north and Longtitude: 118° 24.0' west can sit on top of each other rather than next to each other, so they match the format of Airport type, Operator, Opened, City, etc.?
1201:
hmm...I am not sure if "Commercial vs. General
Aviation" is a good choice of words, especially with the later? There are too many grey areas. "Public|Private|Military" sounds better and more precise?--
931:
even just leave the field out. I think that this is a pretty useful field -- every airport is officially associated with some community, somewhere (even if it's only a few cabins), and the
1493:
1148:
Generally, I would think that "distance from CBD" would refer to the city airport serves, regardless of where it's located. But if the aiport is large enough and serves two cities, I like
206:
What type? does it have buses that freight passangers from/to the plain and the terminal, do people walk (smaller ones), or does it have that arm-to-airplane system larger airports have
918:
is the correct term, and one that is applicable to all airports. Anyone who requires clarification can follow the link (the point of a wiki) and see its near-equivalent 'downtown'."
1389:
The phrase 'Quick info' seems weird. Information presented on a screen does not have speed. I am sure that there is a better phrase like 'Summary', 'Overview' or something else.
1326:
Removing the date opened from the infobox, to be put inline of the article, as it is not a simple fact (sometimes there are 2 dates, official opening and actual opening)
1042:
Er hold on....why gut it? It was actually quite a useful info as far as basic airport info is concerned. Btw, you sure there are only so few airports with that field?--
1016:
1638:
1544:
I'm guessing the letters and numbers in the first 'runway' column, referrring to direction, are latitude or something relatively simple, but could they be explained?
1152:
idea of "Distance to CBD:" and then "XXX km/miles (City name)" for both cities. Such cases are rare in any case, and this seems an understandable clarification.--
995:
966:
What about just dropping the distance from the infobox altogether. It can be mentioned in the article and it is probably better explained in a sentence anyway.
1188:
2 issues.One is with space, fitting all the words. Second is with AoE. I happen to understand that as my brother is a pilot, but not many others will, IMHO.
1137:
I had an idea regarding this. We could say "Distance from $ town", and then fill it in as part of the template, to make it clear where we were referring to.
589:
347:
My only other suggestion is having more space between the text and the lines of the table. It seems a tiny bit cramped at the moment. Otherwise, great job!
452:
Yes, this is still in test phase I have still not implemented it wiki-wide. If you wish to merge in all the changes listed here and do that, be my guest.
1032:
1355:
after (if an airport is named after or known to belong to a town) would be a good idea. Then again, town centre or town border? What's common there? --
184:
Change format of directional notation so it doesn't look like a date/is more understandable to laypeople (maybe define up in the "Direction" cell?)
426:
79:
71:
66:
813:
I am going to make a template out of it, and then include that. The infobox is a good idea, we just need to be selective about what we include.
425:
It seems that the test is still running, when it was meant to end months ago. It has also has been implemented on a few other airports, such as
1069:
1559:
how you can explain all of that in an infobox, but the key point is that it's just the runway surface's name, regardless of how it's derived.
1028:
948:
However, the current infobox is serves, which may not be the closest community. This information is useful, just probably not in the infobox
275:
250:
220:
1273:
As stats has been moved out of the main infobox, a stats infobox needs to be created. I propose an inline, rather than on the side, one.
1287:
remove year opened (the information is not easy to find for smaller airports, and probably belongs as part of a history section anyway).
975:
I'm not opposed to doing that. I removed it from the infobox I put on the Australian airports. For some airports, the distance from the
374:
seem to be enough disclaimers around the WP anyhow. Perhaps smth like a reference to the source (e.g. DAFIF or FAA database revision).
307:
437:
1093:
The point of a infobox is fast information. There are no infoboxes, that I have seen anyway, that have so much wordage in them.
1625:
I'm not playing the devil's advocate, frankly, but I really don't like the colour scheme. The blue colour is grotesque. :-) --
1024:
1012:
192:
For airport like JFK which are actually inside the borders of a city, the field "closest town" should be replaced with "city".
1496:
to ensure that number of number of {{ equals number of }}, and that number of {| equals the number of |}. -- All the best,
1117:
1020:
927:
Agreed. Ironically, plenty of airports are located within city boundaries, and hence, that field would have indicated 0km!
47:
17:
1007:
580:
287:
271:
1304:
Year opened is pretty easy one, as most airports have an official opening and an actual one. Elevation might be good.
1068:
The major is, distance to what town? That must be made very clear, and that is why a sentence is better. For instance
1051:
Thus are the only airports that have got the infobox so far. I am removing it from the infobox, not from the article.
1001:
993:
Removed, but the following pages need to have the data merged back into the article. Please strike as they are done:
914:
countries. As for it being too technical, I think that is negligible, especially within an infobox citing ICAO/IATA.
858:
555:
38:
906:"The only thing that I am disagreeing with you on, is the "Distance from" section. Town is erroneous terminology.
1482:
976:
915:
907:
1513:
1489:
865:
Should we rename "distance from town" and "nearest town" to "distance from community" and "nearest community"?
529:
1609:
1449:
357:
about what they are (and those who don't know can follow the links anyway, and learn something rather useful!)
1642:
911:
792:
1605:
1587:
1523:
891:
887:
1392:
I would use symbolic format for the units. Thus 'feet' would become 'ft' and 'Meters' would become 'm'.
1445:
362:
295:
1401:
1105:
1649:
1551:
1533:
1530:
1503:
1469:
1404:
440:. If I may still nitpick... it claims the closest town is Manchester, 16 km away. Err, what about
410:
267:
249:
What security one must go through ( with further info on that in the article itself of course ) --
1637:
It is useful standard practice to link coordinates to a map sources page with links to maps, see
1570:
Should we rename "Direction" to "Name" or "Designation"? Is there a useful article to link to?
444:, which is a reasonably sizeable place itself, and is practically at the end of the runway? --
635:
185:
163:
155:
1340:
Note, I am still uncertain as to the airport type naming, so I am leaving that alone for now.
1319:
I have looked at all the suggestions here and I have come up with a set of proposed changes:
1582:
1466:
1465:
The IATA link goes to a list, it probably should go to the article like the link for ICAO.
1344:
1305:
1274:
1234:
1215:
1189:
1168:
1153:
1138:
1121:
1094:
1077:
1052:
1036:
987:
980:
967:
949:
921:
880:
873:
837:
814:
623:
453:
445:
398:
Note that using a template as an argument for another template does not currently work, see
193:
147:
88:
1608:
are 127T/307T, so the heading is 13T/31T and the listing in the CFS is 13T(127T)/31T(307T)
1332:
Maintain removal of distance, as this is not a cut and dry fact either (distance to where?)
178:
IATA/ICOA links should go to as close to the actual codes as possible (without redirection)
1500:
1125:
1113:
291:
216:
What airlines frequently fly from this airport ( this should have a last-updated thing ).
1529:, a more generic name for the same thing (just a |} ). In the future, use that template.
1581:
Runway should mention it, if it doesn't it should be added. Either of those names work.
1181:
3 types: Public|Private|Military, Aiport of Entry:Yes|No and Scheduled Commercial Yes|No
1626:
1398:
1294:
It might also be interesting to flag whether the airport is towered, if there's room.
132:
181:
Has "metres" and "kilometers"--should be consistent spelling, whether BE or AE is used
128:
Also, the colours are a bit garish! I suggest a single, light colour for all headings.
1548:
1109:
825:
490:
1351:
Sounds like a good idea to me, although the information of distance to a town it is
1646:
1202:
1149:
1085:
1060:
1043:
960:
241:
379:
334:"Statistics" and "2003" can be on the same line, saving space: Statistics (2003)
46:
If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the
1571:
1497:
1422:
1368:
1356:
1295:
1254:
1219:
1177:
1129:
940:
866:
829:
804:
430:
167:
604:
591:
213:
First flights, is it a 24/7 airport or does it start/stop at a specific time?
1639:
Knowledge (XXG):Manual_of_Style_(dates_and_numbers)#Geographical_coordinates
414:
403:
392:
110:
879:
We might thus also want to add a "primarily serves" or something similar.
413:
so that coordinates go in one box. It really is needed for the future. --
123:
some indication of size - number of flights per day? number of passengers?
910:
is universally understood, though admittedly in more common usage in the
441:
1073:
1072:
serves Montreal, but is not located anywhere near it. It is located in
399:
939:, at least, provide this information for every single airport listed.
559:
481:
using parentheses () rather than oblique / where units are adjacent
331:
Latitude and longitude font should be same as others (10px, right?)
429:
so is the test over or not? :P I like the infobox, by the way. -
159:
1104:, unfortunately, is inconsistent about this. For example, for
236:
List airlines serving it; airlines using as a hub/repair center
120:
distance from nearest town (or the town it's supposed to serve)
140:
Swap Lat and Long so that they are title over data, not beside
25:
1444:
I think the 'Elevation MSL' should be changed to 'Elevation
799:
markup than content, and I think that is counterproductive.
505:
493:
117:
The following might also be of interest for the infobox:
1323:
Creation of stats infobox, to be inline with the article
1335:
Addition of the customs. This would be a simple yes/no.
979:
is a notable feature, for others, it's insignificant.--
266:
I'm rewriting this infobox in the template syntax, see
1562:
Note another possible point of confusion: the runway
1076:. Should the distance be to Mirabel or to Montreal?
306:
My comments are based on the test infobox posted at
1100:That's a good point about possible confusion. The
578:
566:
548:
536:
522:
510:
1017:Hartsfield-Jackson Atlanta International Airport
203:Is it the international airport for the country?
200:Use the Template syntax, not a hand-edited table
99:I suggest putting these settings in the table:
1382:I have the following comments on the infobox:
1120:, on the other hand, it gives the distance to
996:Ottawa/Macdonald-Cartier International Airport
286:I hope you don't mind but I made the image on
1488:Please end infoboxes started using this with
1233:I prefer "Commercial"|"Private"|"Military".--
752:
662:
657:
652:
8:
747:
647:
469:the term 'Summary' rather than 'Quick Info'
230:Include number of passengers, flights, etc.
1033:Baltimore-Washington International Airport
262:Rewriting the page in the template syntax
500:
472:the term 'Operator' rather than 'Run by'
1633:Linking coordinates to map sources page
1421:I have no objection to these changes.
725:
703:
681:
427:Charles de Gaulle International Airport
1070:Montreal/Mirabel International Airport
585:
571:
553:
541:
527:
515:
44:Do not edit the contents of this page.
1118:Monteal/Mirabel International Airport
1029:John F. Kennedy International Airport
7:
143:Change Takeoffs to Takeoffs/Landings
87:Leave your comments below: Thanks,
1492:, as this makes it much easier for
478:unit symbols rather than unit names
409:I've taken the liberty to rewritte
233:Indicate size, numer of gates, etc.
24:
674:
669:
633:
621:
308:Los Angeles International Airport
272:User:Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason/temp
438:Manchester International Airport
29:
1641:. I suggest to do that also in
1025:Frankfurt International Airport
1013:Hong Kong International Airport
1290:add elevation above sea level.
495:Victoria International Airport
369:geographical etc. data changes
1:
859:Template talk:Airport infobox
18:Template talk:Infobox airport
1112:rather than the distance to
1021:O'Hare International Airport
1008:Ruzyne International Airport
288:Narita International Airport
158:. Please try not to link to
1534:14:18, 11 August 2005 (UTC)
1483:Template talk:Airport frame
1397:Trying to be constructive.
1108:, it gives the distance to
1002:Kabul International Airport
104:cellpadding=2 cellspacing=0
1665:
1650:20:56, 9 August 2005 (UTC)
1490:Template:Airport end frame
1347:16:24, Apr 23, 2005 (UTC)
1097:20:06, Apr 18, 2005 (UTC)
1080:18:49, Apr 18, 2005 (UTC)
1055:18:31, Apr 18, 2005 (UTC)
1039:16:48, Apr 18, 2005 (UTC)
990:16:42, Apr 18, 2005 (UTC)
986:Ok, I am going to gut it.
937:Airport/Facility Directory
883:11:38, Apr 18, 2005 (UTC)
740:
735:
730:
718:
713:
708:
696:
691:
686:
556:Victoria, British Columbia
530:Victoria Airport Authority
436:I just spotted the box at
150:10:09, Jun 17, 2004 (UTC)
91:08:43, Jun 17, 2004 (UTC)
1592:23:45, May 17, 2005 (UTC)
1470:03:45, 16 July 2005 (UTC)
1308:15:38, Apr 23, 2005 (UTC)
1298:12:26, 2005 Apr 23 (UTC)
1277:11:37, Apr 18, 2005 (UTC)
1192:12:07, Apr 18, 2005 (UTC)
1171:11:34, Apr 18, 2005 (UTC)
1141:23:36, Apr 18, 2005 (UTC)
983:16:38, 18 Apr 2005 (UTC)
970:16:25, Apr 18, 2005 (UTC)
963:15:17, 18 Apr 2005 (UTC)
952:18:31, Apr 18, 2005 (UTC)
924:15:02, 18 Apr 2005 (UTC)
876:11:34, Apr 18, 2005 (UTC)
869:11:24, 2005 Apr 18 (UTC)
840:01:59, Apr 16, 2005 (UTC)
832:01:54, 2005 Apr 16 (UTC)
817:01:46, Apr 16, 2005 (UTC)
807:11:09, 2005 Apr 15 (UTC)
771:
759:
488:Thus the table would be:
456:16:25, Mar 15, 2005 (UTC)
448:16:04, 15 Mar 2005 (UTC)
433:16:49, 13 Feb 2005 (UTC)
417:17:13, 13 Feb 2005 (UTC)
406:07:09, 11 Feb 2005 (UTC)
395:19:29, 10 Feb 2005 (UTC)
382:20:31, 17 Nov 2004 (UTC)
365:11:04, 2004 Nov 12 (UTC)
196:20:57, 20 Jun 2004 (UTC)
174:Looks good, mostly nits:
113:09:00, 17 Jun 2004 (UTC)
1643:Template:Airport infobox
1629:4 July 2005 15:51 (UTC)
1612:08:07, 13 Jun 2005 (UTC)
1574:23:23, 2005 May 17 (UTC)
1552:17:18, 17 May 2005 (UTC)
1504:01:55, 14 May 2005 (UTC)
1452:08:09, 13 Jun 2005 (UTC)
1359:17:25, 23 Apr 2005 (UTC)
1257:17:30, 2005 Apr 18 (UTC)
1237:15:09, 18 Apr 2005 (UTC)
1222:13:32, 2005 Apr 18 (UTC)
1205:12:21, 18 Apr 2005 (UTC)
1156:01:05, 19 Apr 2005 (UTC)
1132:21:30, 2005 Apr 18 (UTC)
1102:Canada Flight Supplement
1088:19:48, 18 Apr 2005 (UTC)
1063:18:45, 18 Apr 2005 (UTC)
1046:17:17, 18 Apr 2005 (UTC)
943:17:36, 2005 Apr 18 (UTC)
933:Canada Flight Supplement
298:13:06, 5 Aug 2004 (UTC)
278:22:20, 2004 Jul 8 (UTC)
244:21:49, Jul 7, 2004 (UTC)
223:18:53, 2004 Jun 22 (UTC)
188:19:26, 17 Jun 2004 (UTC)
170:10:31, 17 Jun 2004 (UTC)
135:13:02, 16 Jun 2004 (UTC)
1425:20:10, 2005 May 3 (UTC)
1405:19:07, 3 May 2005 (UTC)
1371:13:14, 2005 May 3 (UTC)
824:I just took at look at
795:, you start off seeing
793:London Heathrow Airport
461:Sentence case and units
276:Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
253:21:56, 2004 Jul 7 (UTC)
251:Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
221:Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
1494:people checking syntax
605:48.64694°N 123.42583°W
1606:Cambridge Bay Airport
886:From my comments on
316:Type of Airport : -->
42:of past discussions.
761:Number of passengers
610:48.64694; -123.42583
501:Picture of airport]
421:Still in test phase?
1610:CambridgeBayWeather
1450:CambridgeBayWeather
1106:Ottawa/Carp Airport
1627:Jerry Crimson Mann
773:Number of takeoffs
568:Distance from town
386:Latitude/longitude
290:non-thumbnail. --
154:Airpoirts have an
1591:
1514:Airport end frame
1282:Suggested changes
1268:Statistic Infobox
872:I like this idea
783:
782:
779:
774:
767:
762:
755:
743:
738:
733:
728:
721:
716:
711:
706:
699:
694:
689:
684:
677:
672:
665:
660:
655:
643:
638:
631:
626:
617:
583:
574:
569:
562:
551:
544:
539:
532:
525:
518:
513:
484:no link for units
164:IATA Airport Code
156:IATA Airport Code
85:
84:
54:
53:
48:current talk page
1656:
1588:✈ take a flight?
1585:
1528:
1522:
1518:
1512:
1315:Proposed Changes
1216:Airport of Entry
777:
772:
765:
760:
753:
741:
736:
731:
726:
719:
714:
709:
704:
697:
692:
687:
682:
675:
670:
663:
658:
653:
641:
634:
629:
622:
616:
615:
613:
612:
611:
606:
602:
599:
598:
597:
594:
586:
579:
573:96 km (35 miles)
572:
567:
554:
549:
542:
537:
528:
523:
516:
511:
491:
326:commercial : -->
105:
63:
56:
55:
33:
32:
26:
1664:
1663:
1659:
1658:
1657:
1655:
1654:
1653:
1635:
1623:
1542:
1526:
1520:
1519:to redirect to
1516:
1510:
1478:
1317:
1284:
1270:
1163:
854:
849:
788:
609:
607:
603:
600:
595:
592:
590:
588:
587:
512:Type of airport
463:
423:
388:
371:
363:Patrick Bernier
354:
304:
284:
264:
103:
97:
59:
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
1662:
1660:
1634:
1631:
1622:
1619:
1618:
1617:
1616:
1615:
1614:
1613:
1596:
1595:
1594:
1593:
1576:
1575:
1568:
1560:
1555:
1554:
1541:
1538:
1537:
1536:
1477:
1474:
1473:
1472:
1462:
1461:
1460:
1459:
1458:
1457:
1456:
1455:
1454:
1453:
1433:
1432:
1431:
1430:
1429:
1428:
1427:
1426:
1412:
1411:
1410:
1409:
1408:
1407:
1395:
1394:
1393:
1390:
1387:
1375:
1374:
1373:
1372:
1361:
1360:
1342:
1341:
1337:
1336:
1333:
1330:
1327:
1324:
1316:
1313:
1312:
1311:
1310:
1309:
1292:
1291:
1288:
1283:
1280:
1279:
1278:
1269:
1266:
1265:
1264:
1263:
1262:
1261:
1260:
1259:
1258:
1243:
1242:
1241:
1240:
1239:
1238:
1226:
1225:
1224:
1223:
1209:
1208:
1207:
1206:
1196:
1195:
1194:
1193:
1183:
1182:
1176:Proposal from
1173:
1172:
1162:
1159:
1158:
1157:
1146:
1145:
1144:
1143:
1142:
1135:
1134:
1133:
1091:
1090:
1089:
1066:
1065:
1064:
1049:
1048:
1047:
973:
972:
971:
957:
956:
955:
954:
953:
946:
945:
944:
900:
899:
898:
897:
896:
895:
877:
853:
850:
848:
845:
844:
843:
842:
841:
821:
820:
819:
818:
787:
784:
781:
780:
775:
769:
768:
763:
757:
756:
750:
749:
745:
744:
739:
734:
729:
723:
722:
717:
712:
707:
701:
700:
695:
690:
685:
679:
678:
673:
667:
666:
661:
656:
650:
649:
645:
644:
639:
632:
627:
619:
618:
584:
576:
575:
570:
564:
563:
552:
546:
545:
540:
534:
533:
526:
520:
519:
514:
508:
507:
503:
502:
498:
497:
486:
485:
482:
479:
476:
473:
470:
462:
459:
458:
457:
422:
419:
391:otherwise. --
387:
384:
370:
367:
353:
350:
349:
348:
345:
339:General notes:
336:
335:
332:
329:
324:
319:
303:
300:
283:
280:
263:
260:
255:
254:
246:
245:
238:
237:
234:
231:
227:
226:
225:
224:
214:
211:
207:
204:
201:
190:
189:
182:
179:
172:
171:
162:when you mean
145:
144:
141:
137:
136:
129:
126:
125:
124:
121:
107:
106:
96:
93:
83:
82:
77:
74:
69:
64:
52:
51:
34:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
1661:
1652:
1651:
1648:
1644:
1640:
1632:
1630:
1628:
1620:
1611:
1607:
1602:
1601:
1600:
1599:
1598:
1597:
1589:
1584:
1580:
1579:
1578:
1577:
1573:
1569:
1565:
1561:
1557:
1556:
1553:
1550:
1547:
1546:
1545:
1539:
1535:
1532:
1525:
1515:
1508:
1507:
1506:
1505:
1502:
1499:
1495:
1491:
1486:
1485:
1484:
1476:Airport frame
1475:
1471:
1468:
1464:
1463:
1451:
1447:
1443:
1442:
1441:
1440:
1439:
1438:
1437:
1436:
1435:
1434:
1424:
1420:
1419:
1418:
1417:
1416:
1415:
1414:
1413:
1406:
1403:
1400:
1396:
1391:
1388:
1384:
1383:
1381:
1380:
1379:
1378:
1377:
1376:
1370:
1365:
1364:
1363:
1362:
1358:
1354:
1350:
1349:
1348:
1346:
1339:
1338:
1334:
1331:
1328:
1325:
1322:
1321:
1320:
1314:
1307:
1303:
1302:
1301:
1300:
1299:
1297:
1289:
1286:
1285:
1281:
1276:
1272:
1271:
1267:
1256:
1251:
1250:
1249:
1248:
1247:
1246:
1245:
1244:
1236:
1232:
1231:
1230:
1229:
1228:
1227:
1221:
1217:
1213:
1212:
1211:
1210:
1204:
1200:
1199:
1198:
1197:
1191:
1187:
1186:
1185:
1184:
1179:
1175:
1174:
1170:
1165:
1164:
1160:
1155:
1151:
1147:
1140:
1136:
1131:
1127:
1123:
1119:
1115:
1111:
1107:
1103:
1099:
1098:
1096:
1092:
1087:
1082:
1081:
1079:
1075:
1071:
1067:
1062:
1057:
1056:
1054:
1050:
1045:
1041:
1040:
1038:
1034:
1030:
1026:
1022:
1018:
1014:
1010:
1009:
1004:
1003:
998:
997:
992:
991:
989:
985:
984:
982:
978:
974:
969:
965:
964:
962:
958:
951:
947:
942:
938:
934:
929:
928:
926:
925:
923:
919:
917:
913:
909:
904:
903:
902:
901:
893:
892:Burgundavia's
889:
885:
884:
882:
878:
875:
871:
870:
868:
864:
863:
862:
861:
860:
851:
846:
839:
834:
833:
831:
827:
826:Help:Template
823:
822:
816:
812:
811:
810:
809:
808:
806:
800:
798:
794:
785:
776:
770:
764:
758:
751:
746:
724:
702:
680:
668:
651:
646:
640:
637:
628:
625:
620:
614:
582:
577:
565:
561:
557:
547:
535:
531:
521:
509:
504:
499:
496:
492:
489:
483:
480:
477:
475:sentence case
474:
471:
468:
467:
466:
460:
455:
451:
450:
449:
447:
443:
439:
434:
432:
428:
420:
418:
416:
412:
407:
405:
401:
396:
394:
385:
383:
381:
375:
368:
366:
364:
358:
351:
346:
343:
342:
341:
340:
333:
330:
325:
320:
315:
314:
313:
312:
309:
301:
299:
297:
293:
289:
281:
279:
277:
273:
269:
261:
259:
252:
248:
247:
243:
240:
239:
235:
232:
229:
228:
222:
218:
217:
215:
212:
208:
205:
202:
199:
198:
197:
195:
187:
183:
180:
177:
176:
175:
169:
165:
161:
157:
153:
152:
151:
149:
142:
139:
138:
134:
130:
127:
122:
119:
118:
116:
115:
114:
112:
102:
101:
100:
94:
92:
90:
81:
78:
75:
73:
70:
68:
65:
62:
58:
57:
49:
45:
41:
40:
35:
28:
27:
19:
1636:
1624:
1563:
1543:
1487:
1480:
1479:
1352:
1343:
1318:
1293:
1214:As long as "
1161:Airport type
1124:rather than
1101:
1006:
1000:
994:
936:
932:
912:Commonwealth
905:
856:
855:
801:
796:
789:
550:Closest town
494:
487:
464:
435:
424:
411:Template:tmp
408:
397:
389:
376:
372:
359:
355:
338:
337:
321:Run by : -->
318:Airport type
310:
305:
285:
268:Template:tmp
265:
256:
191:
186:Niteowlneils
173:
146:
108:
98:
86:
60:
43:
37:
1583:Burgundavia
1481:Moved from
1467:Vegaswikian
1345:Burgundavia
1306:Burgundavia
1275:Burgundavia
1235:Cyberjunkie
1190:Burgundavia
1169:Burgundavia
1154:Cyberjunkie
1139:Burgundavia
1095:Burgundavia
1078:Burgundavia
1053:Burgundavia
1037:Burgundavia
988:Burgundavia
981:Cyberjunkie
968:Burgundavia
950:Burgundavia
922:Cyberjunkie
894:talk pages.
881:Burgundavia
874:Burgundavia
857:Moved from
838:Burgundavia
815:Burgundavia
786:Obfuscation
748:Statistics
596:123°25′33″W
581:Coordinates
465:I suggest:
454:Burgundavia
352:Suggestions
311:Copy edits:
282:Dethumbnail
194:WhisperToMe
148:Burgundavia
89:Burgundavia
36:This is an
1567:threshold.
1509:I set the
1329:Adding ASL
1178:User:Dpm64
593:48°38′49″N
517:Commercial
400:bug report
328:Commercial
292:EmperorBMA
95:Commentary
1524:End frame
1399:Bobblewik
1150:Huaiwei's
778:5,000,000
766:5,000,000
654:Direction
210:deposits.
133:Auximines
80:Archive 5
72:Archive 3
67:Archive 2
61:Archive 1
1549:A.K.A.47
1122:Montreal
852:Renaming
754:For 1998
648:Runways
524:Operator
506:Summary
442:Wilmslow
323:Operator
166:. ;-) —
1647:Patrick
1564:surface
1531:Dbinder
1203:Huaiwei
1126:Mirabel
1086:Huaiwei
1074:Mirabel
1061:Huaiwei
1059:area.--
1044:Huaiwei
961:Huaiwei
935:and US
664:Surface
242:Xyzzyva
39:archive
1621:Trivia
1540:Runway
1402:(talk)
1386:info'.
1180:-: -->
1116:; for
1114:Ottawa
659:Length
560:Canada
538:Opened
380:BACbKA
1572:David
1498:Nickj
1423:David
1369:David
1357:AlexR
1353:named
1296:David
1255:David
1220:David
1130:David
941:David
867:David
847:Ideas
830:David
805:David
742:Paved
727:13/31
720:Paved
705:02/20
698:Paved
683:09/27
446:Arwel
431:Joolz
402:. --
327:: -->
322:: -->
317:: -->
168:Timwi
16:<
1110:Carp
890:and
797:more
737:2000
732:7000
715:2000
710:7000
693:2000
688:7000
671:(ft)
642:CYYJ
636:ICAO
624:IATA
543:Date
415:Egil
404:Egil
393:Egil
302:Nits
270:and
160:IATA
111:Yath
1645:.--
1501:(t)
1446:ASL
1011:],
977:CBD
959:D--
916:CBD
908:CBD
676:(m)
630:YYJ
601:/
109:--
1527:}}
1521:{{
1517:}}
1511:{{
1035:.
1031:,
1027:,
1023:,
1019:,
1015:,
1005:,
999:,
920:--
888:my
608:/
558:,
361:--
296:話す
274:--
219:--
131:--
76:→
1590:)
1586:(
294:|
50:.
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.