Knowledge (XXG)

Tenth Amendment to the United States Constitution

Source 📝

808:(1992), the Supreme Court invalidated part of the Low-Level Radioactive Waste Policy Amendments Act of 1985. The act provided three incentives for states to comply with statutory obligations to provide for the disposal of low-level radioactive waste. The first two incentives were monetary. The third, which was challenged in this case, obliged states to take title to any waste within their borders that was not disposed of prior to January 1, 1996, and made each state liable for all damages directly related to the waste. The Court ruled that imposing that obligation on a state violates the Tenth Amendment. Justice 895:, the Court ruled that federal regulation of wheat production could constitutionally be applied to wheat grown for "home consumption" on a farm (i.e., fed to animals or otherwise consumed on the premises). The rationale was that a farmer's growing "his own" can have a substantial cumulative effect on interstate commerce, because if all farmers were to exceed their production quotas, a significant amount of wheat would either not be sold on the market or would be bought from other producers. Hence, in the aggregate, if farmers were allowed to consume their own wheat, it would affect the interstate market. 62: 427: 567: 439: 451: 908:" on and around public school campuses was struck down. The Supreme Court ruled that there was no clause in the Constitution authorizing the federal law. This was the first modern Supreme Court opinion to limit the government's power under the Commerce Clause. The opinion did not mention the Tenth Amendment or the Court's 1985 1000:
Appeals for the Eighth Circuit reversed the district court's decision on August 18, 1958, and stayed its mandate pending appeal to the Supreme Court. By this time, the incident had evolved into a national issue: it had become a debate not only on racism and segregation but also on states' rights and the Tenth Amendment.
1177:. The Court classified the ACA's language as coercive because it effectively forced States to join the federal program by conditioning the continued provision of Medicaid funds on states agreeing to materially alter Medicaid eligibility to include all individuals who fell below 133% of the poverty line. 686:
I find, from looking into the amendments proposed by the State conventions, that several are particularly anxious that it should be declared in the Constitution, that the powers not therein delegated should be reserved to the several States. Perhaps words which may define this more precisely than the
734:
The amendment states but a truism that all is retained which has not been surrendered. There is nothing in the history of its adoption to suggest that it was more than declaratory of the relationship between the national and state governments as it had been established by the Constitution before the
1035:
Nullification refers to a legal theory suggesting that states may evaluate the legality of federal laws and declare them unconstitutional with respect to the US Constitution. The intended effect is to invalidate (nullify) the laws within the state's boundaries. A related notion of interposition
999:
Five months after the integration crisis happened, the school board filed suit in the United States District Court of the Eastern District of Arkansas requesting a two-and-a-half-year delay in implementing desegregation. Although the district court granted the relief, the United States Court of
666:
opposed the amendments, stating that "it was impossible to confine a Government to the exercise of express powers; there must necessarily be admitted powers by implication, unless the Constitution descended to recount every minutia." When a vote on this version of the amendment with "expressly
1144:. One example of the exercise of this device was to condition allocation of federal funding where certain state laws do not conform to federal guidelines. For example, federal educational funds may not be accepted without implementation of special education programs in compliance with 856:
when the law was enacted from legalizing it, violated the anti-commandeering doctrine and invalidated the entire law. The Court ruled that the anti-commandeering doctrine applied to congressional attempts to prevent the states from taking a certain action as much as it applied in
1036:
refers to a belief that it is a right of a state to thwart enforcement of federal laws that the state considers unconstitutional and as such are harmful to its inhabitants. The state is said to be "interposing" itself between the federal government and the people of the state.
687:
whole of the instrument now does, may be considered as superfluous. I admit they may be deemed unnecessary: but there can be no harm in making such a declaration, if gentlemen will allow that the fact is as stated. I am sure I understand it so, and do therefore propose it.
1043:
suggesting that because the states created the federal government by agreement ("compact") to join the Union, they alone can determine how much power they delegate to the federal authorities. This is in opposition to the current practice where only federal courts perform
1114:
Today, laws that appear to circumvent some Supreme Court decisions or federal law may sometimes be called laws of nullification, including in cases if they do not explicitly urge to defy federal law or resist federal authority. Examples of this usage include the
581: 619:, originally proposed the text of what would later become the Tenth Amendment as an amendment to the Articles of Confederation. Thomas Burke wanted to ensure that there was no ambiguity concerning differences in state or federal power. Other 767:
to cover government-run mass transit systems also provided substantial funding for those systems, the Court concluded that the structure created by the Framers had indeed protected the states from overreaching by the federal government.
691:
The states ratified the Tenth Amendment, declining to signal that there are unenumerated powers in addition to unenumerated rights. The amendment rendered unambiguous what had previously been at most a mere suggestion or an implication.
580: 2940: 337: 2758: 735:
amendment or that its purpose was other than to allay fears that the new national government might seek to exercise powers not granted, and that the states might not be able to exercise fully their reserved powers.
2695: 2796: 1064:, several states relied on this interpretation to declare nullification of federal laws or decisions of the US Supreme Court, but the Supreme Court struck down all such efforts. Among the most famous was the 533:
in 1789 during its first term following the adoption of the Constitution. It was considered by many members as a prerequisite before they would ratify the Constitution, and particularly to satisfy demands of
1191: 608:
Each state retains its sovereignty, freedom, and independence, and every power, jurisdiction, and right, which is not by this Confederation expressly delegated to the United States, in Congress assembled.
877:
became one of the most frequently-used sources of Congress's power. Its interpretation is important in determining the allowable scope of federal government. Complex economic challenges arising from the
3165: 541:
The purpose of this amendment is to reaffirm the principles of federalism and reinforce the notion of the Federal Government maintaining only limited, enumerated powers. Some legal scholars (including
2935: 682:
When James Madison introduced the Tenth Amendment in Congress, he explained that many states were eager to ratify this amendment, despite critics who deemed the amendment superfluous or unnecessary:
3882: 3897: 413: 2768: 2652: 2452: 2384: 996:. The tension became severe when Governor Faubus ordered the National Guard to prevent the nine from entering the school and President Eisenhower responded with federal troops to escort them. 280: 126: 2638: 272: 839:
to show that the act violated the Tenth Amendment. Since the act "forced participation of the State's executive in the actual administration of a federal program", it was unconstitutional.
3416: 2623: 2613: 257: 245: 2633: 2628: 2618: 2608: 481: 267: 262: 252: 240: 2588: 2318: 1161: 218: 2598: 2593: 2562: 2557: 849: 755:, the determination of whether there was state immunity from federal regulation turned on whether the state activity was "traditional" for or "integral" to the state government. In 230: 225: 203: 198: 2603: 2583: 2567: 2323: 2036: 2017: 1998: 1973: 1948: 1847: 1822: 1792: 1764: 1717: 1692: 1667: 1642: 1617: 235: 213: 208: 967:(1958), the Supreme Court dealt with states' rights and the Tenth Amendment. The case came about when conflicts arose in direct response to the ruling of another landmark case, 3160: 2534: 1662: 1140:
For this reason, Congress often seeks to exercise its powers by encouraging States to implement national programs consistent with national minimum standards; a system known as
812:
wrote that the federal government can encourage the states to adopt certain regulations through the spending power (e.g. attach conditions to the receipt of federal funds, see
741: 703:
The Tenth Amendment, which makes explicit the idea that the powers of the federal government are limited to those powers granted in the Constitution, has been declared to be a
188: 3411: 2539: 2503: 193: 166: 3815: 2508: 2488: 2478: 1842: 1120: 844: 171: 151: 141: 3255: 3220: 2950: 2513: 2498: 2493: 2483: 2473: 1013:. Expectedly, many states' right advocates and state officials criticized the ruling as an attack on the Tenth Amendment. Moreover, they claimed the Court's decision on 831:
violated the Tenth Amendment. The act required state and local law enforcement officials to conduct background checks on people attempting to purchase handguns. Justice
176: 161: 156: 146: 136: 2118: 406: 1156:
were imposed through this method; the states would lose highway funding if they refused to pass such laws (though the national speed limit has since been repealed).
3341: 3063: 2442: 2422: 2377: 949:
enter the stream of interstate commerce, even if it clearly had not been grown for that purpose and was unlikely ever to reach any market (the same reasoning as in
116: 96: 3826: 3265: 2432: 2427: 106: 101: 562:
The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people.
3250: 3245: 3235: 3215: 3195: 3140: 2437: 2417: 2412: 111: 91: 86: 1488: 1088:, however, ended all appeals to state sovereignty and the Supreme Court's authority as the highest interpreter of constitutional law stopped to be challenged. 3633: 2685: 1225: 571: 474: 317: 1554:
1991): "The ninth amendment was added to the Bill of Rights to ensure that the maxim expressio unius est exclusio alterius would not be used at a later time
787:
would be when a state lacked "any right to participate" in the federal political process or was left "politically isolated and powerless" by a federal law.
3346: 3145: 1145: 2881: 2407: 2370: 1166: 675:
drafted the Tenth Amendment in its ratified form, omitting "expressly." Sherman's language allowed for an expansive reading of the powers implied by the
78: 43: 2258: 763:
believed state sovereignty could be maintained by the political system established by the Constitution. Noting that the same Congress that extended the
2285: 799:
has ruled the Tenth Amendment prohibits the federal government from forcing states to pass or not pass certain legislation, or to enforce federal law.
3120: 3090: 2876: 2841: 2821: 643: 349: 344: 327: 3923: 3125: 941:. Even though the woman grew cannabis strictly for her own consumption and never sold any, the Supreme Court stated that growing one's own cannabis 612: 1737: 3336: 655: 519: 467: 1131:
The federal system limits the ability of the federal government to use state governments as an instrument of the national government, as held in
392: 383: 818:,) or through the commerce power (directly pre-empt state law). However, Congress cannot directly compel states to enforce federal regulations. 3426: 3095: 2973: 3918: 3648: 2738: 2733: 2660: 1927: 1902: 828: 620: 590:
The hand-written copy of the proposed Bill of Rights, 1789, cropped to show only the text that would later be ratified as the Tenth Amendment
288: 882:
triggered a reevaluation in both Congress and the Supreme Court of the use of Commerce Clause powers to maintain a strong national economy.
3861: 3381: 3175: 1045: 720:
States and local governments have occasionally attempted to assert exemption from various federal regulations, especially in the areas of
522:
has only those powers delegated to it by the Constitution, and that all other powers not forbidden to the states by the Constitution are
3757: 3376: 2968: 1867: 3938: 3013: 1687: 1471: 1092: 796: 747: 714: 361: 3356: 2718: 2393: 2123: 1637: 1415: 1330: 1061: 1057: 1026: 930: 726: 69: 51: 3856: 3200: 31: 3205: 3190: 922: 511: 356: 3612: 624: 2132: 1003:
The Court cited the Supremacy Clause of Article VI, which declares the Constitution to be the supreme law of the land, and
3933: 3326: 2915: 929:
crop was seized and destroyed by federal agents. Medical cannabis was explicitly made legal under California state law by
1600:
The message of the Tenth Amendment is that expressio unius est exclusio alterius applies to lists of governmental powers.
1292:"Freedom and Diversity in a Federal System: Perspectives on State Constitutions and the Washington Declaration of Rights" 3876: 3674: 3105: 2978: 2783: 2665: 2465: 507: 368: 295: 2300: 3890: 3794: 3752: 3747: 3150: 2836: 2801: 977:, the Supreme Court unanimously declared racial segregation of children in public schools unconstitutional. Following 969: 676: 1080:
void in the state, but it was resolved when tariffs were lowered to South Carolina's satisfaction and when President
3928: 2061: 992:
were to attend the previously all-white Central High School under the school board's attempt to follow the order of
3844: 3291: 3260: 3110: 2983: 2748: 2743: 1170: 1107:. Ten ex-Confederate states passed declarations of interposition to oppose these efforts. But the Supreme court in 1069: 759:, the Court noted that this analysis was "unsound in principle and unworkable in practice", and concluded that the 530: 503: 2158: 1464:
The First Congress: How James Madison, George Washington, and a Group of Extraordinary Men Invented the Government
1354: 3592: 3472: 3271: 3003: 2826: 2703: 2549: 2091: 1759: 981:, the court ordered district courts and school boards to proceed with desegregation "with all deliberate speed". 938: 804: 601: 399: 373: 724:
and environmental controls, using the Tenth Amendment as a basis for their claim. An often-repeated quote, from
61: 3561: 3431: 3295: 3155: 2920: 2910: 2778: 2087: 1612: 953:). It therefore ruled that this practice may be regulated by the federal government under the Commerce Clause. 764: 709: 695:
The origin of the last 4 words of the 10th amendment, added by the Senate, is in dispute. See the Talk page.
3351: 3299: 3225: 3053: 2930: 2925: 2861: 2831: 2773: 1817: 1712: 1221: 1133: 823: 773: 1547: 1515: 1401: 3514: 3386: 3033: 2958: 2905: 2856: 2680: 2357: 1968: 1186: 1141: 1073: 900: 809: 312: 3721: 3100: 3068: 2899: 2728: 2675: 2327: 2040: 2021: 2002: 1977: 1952: 1851: 1826: 1796: 1768: 1721: 1696: 1671: 1646: 1621: 1438: 587: 305: 3866: 3421: 3135: 3130: 3085: 3058: 3008: 2753: 1787: 1065: 905: 814: 616: 431: 553:, a statement affirming that the federal government does not have any rights that it does not have. 3849: 3638: 3366: 3230: 3018: 2963: 2866: 2723: 1116: 984:
Among those opposing the decision (and all efforts of desegregation) was the Governor of Arkansas,
647: 639: 1434: 3551: 3535: 3396: 3210: 3185: 3170: 3080: 3048: 3038: 2998: 2988: 1943: 1591: 1516:"Bill of Rights Documents: Document 11: House of Representatives, Amendments to the Constitution" 1247: 1100: 1085: 1005: 887: 3871: 3617: 3602: 3582: 3456: 3331: 3310: 3074: 2886: 2713: 2346: 1993: 1923: 1898: 1624: 1467: 1411: 1336: 1326: 1196: 1104: 917: 632: 550: 515: 3493: 3240: 3115: 3043: 3028: 2763: 2708: 2670: 2239: 1583: 1574: 1375: 1291: 1201: 1053: 989: 926: 879: 300: 1649: 3778: 3726: 3607: 3566: 3477: 3401: 3305: 3287: 3023: 2993: 2851: 1738:"Federalism and Intergovernmental Tax Immunity Now Rest In Peace: South Carolina v. Baker" 1379: 1323:
Powers reserved for the people and the states: a history of the Ninth and Tenth Amendments
1269: 963: 934: 874: 721: 566: 535: 523: 455: 2065: 1429: 1427: 1569: 1091:
The idea of nullification gained new traction in the 1950s as the Supreme Court ordered
3716: 3695: 3679: 3643: 3587: 3556: 3371: 2330: 2043: 1980: 1955: 1829: 1799: 1771: 1724: 1699: 1674: 1081: 1077: 1040: 853: 832: 659: 651: 628: 450: 3912: 3821: 3742: 3700: 3669: 3597: 3519: 3391: 3361: 3277: 3180: 2891: 2846: 2024: 2005: 1854: 1049: 1030: 779: 672: 663: 2362: 2204: 1493: 1153: 985: 892: 1111:
rejected the declarations and held nullification and interposition impermissible.
2286:"Did SCOTUS Finally Wake Up to the Threat of State Nullification of Federal Law?" 3773: 3653: 1149: 668: 546: 529:
The amendment, with origins before the American Revolution, was proposed by the
438: 17: 3498: 3282: 1868:"Opinion analysis: Justices strike down federal sports gambling law (Updated)" 542: 443: 3406: 1340: 717:
asserted that the amendment "added nothing to the as originally ratified."
1551: 1174: 2227: 3441: 2871: 2181: 760: 1595: 1489:"Constitutional Myth #7: The 10th Amendment Protects 'States' Rights'" 635:. Nevertheless, the amendment was passed by the Continental Congress. 2243: 1103:
to oppose it, arguing that federal desegregation orders infringed on
1017:
as being inconsistent with the constitutional vision of the Framers.
704: 2351: 646:
and ratification of the Constitution, South Carolina Representative
1587: 1152:, 0.08 legal blood alcohol limit, and the nationwide state 21-year 510:, was ratified on December 15, 1791. It expresses the principle of 2119:"The Supreme Court and the Rule of Law: Cooper v. Aaron Revisited" 1405: 1321:
McAffee, Thomas B.; Bybee, Jay S.; Bryant, A. Christopher (2006).
1169:(commonly referred to as the ACA or Obamacare) unconstitutionally 565: 2228:"The Southern Manifesto and Southern Opposition to Desegregation" 1009:
in holding that the states must abide by the Court's decision in
1544: 1522:. University of Chicago. June 8; July 21; August 13, 18-19, 1789 1192:
State legislation in protest of federal law in the United States
1084:
threatened military intervention unless the state relented. The
2366: 1148:. Similarly, the nationwide state 55 mph (89 km/h) 1060:
that lay the bedrock for arguments for nullification. In the
538:, who opposed the creation of a stronger federal government. 1270:"Essay on the Tenth Amendment:Reserved Powers of the States" 1435:"House of Representatives, Amendments to the Constitution" 1226:
United States National Archives and Records Administration
2182:"The Principles of '98: An Essay in Historical Retrieval" 945:
the interstate market of cannabis. In theory the product
658:
to powers "expressly" delegated, which would have denied
2205:"Judicial Review and its Alternatives: An American Tale" 1099:, and Southern states in response mounted a campaign of 2319:
National Federation of Independent Business v. Sebelius
2301:"State Legislators Want to Nullify Federal Gun Control" 1922:. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. p. 36. 1897:. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. p. 13. 1162:
National Federation of Independent Business v. Sebelius
1466:. New York City, NY: Simon and Schuster. p. 130. 1039:
The concept of nullification stems from the so-called
850:
Professional and Amateur Sports Protection Act of 1992
30:"Tenth Amendment" redirects here. For other uses, see 865:
to Congress requiring states to enforce federal law.
1663:
Garcia v. San Antonio Metropolitan Transit Authority
1325:. Westport, Conn.: Praeger Publishers. p. 177. 1123:
Preservation Act or immigration and marijuana laws.
742:
Garcia v. San Antonio Metropolitan Transit Authority
654:
separately proposed similar amendments limiting the
600:
The Tenth Amendment is similar to Article II of the
3835: 3807: 3787: 3766: 3735: 3709: 3688: 3662: 3626: 3575: 3544: 3528: 3507: 3486: 3465: 3449: 3440: 3319: 2949: 2814: 2694: 2651: 2576: 2548: 2527: 2464: 2451: 2400: 3816:Notes of Debates in the Federal Convention of 1787 1843:Murphy v. National Collegiate Athletic Association 845:Murphy v. National Collegiate Athletic Association 631:(who drafted the Articles of Confederation), and 549:) have effectively classified the amendment as a 615:, a vehement supporter of states' rights in the 1568:Calabresi, Steven; Prakash, Saikrishna (1994). 732: 606: 560: 3827:Bibliography of the United States Constitution 1355:"Tenth Amendment – Reserved Powers – Contents" 2378: 2159:"Cooper v. Aaron and the Faces of Federalism" 937:being prohibited at the federal level by the 475: 8: 1457: 1455: 2347:CRS Annotated Constitution: Tenth Amendment 1570:"The President's Power to Execute the Laws" 1410:. University Press of America. p. 63. 1364:. United States Government Printing Office. 3446: 2461: 2457: 2385: 2371: 2363: 1376:"Articles of Confederation: March 1, 1781" 1167:Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act 482: 468: 38: 1812: 1810: 1808: 1302:(3). Digitalcommons.law.seattleu.edu: 491 1290:Justice Robert F. Utter (July 18, 2010). 988:. A group of black students known as the 848:(2018), the Supreme Court ruled that the 827:(1997), the Court ruled that part of the 623:disagreed with this amendment, including 27:1791 amendment enumerating states' rights 3883:Scene at the Signing of the Constitution 1782: 1780: 1213: 382: 326: 125: 68: 50: 1246:National Archives (October 30, 2015). 852:, which prohibited states that banned 2284:Dorf, Michael C. (October 25, 2023). 2152: 2150: 2112: 2110: 2108: 2056: 2054: 2052: 1222:"The Bill of Rights: A Transcription" 1048:of allegedly offending federal laws. 829:Brady Handgun Violence Prevention Act 621:Founding Fathers of the United States 7: 3862:Constitution Day and Citizenship Day 1407:Thomas Burke: Restless Revolutionary 921:(2005), a California woman sued the 835:, writing for the majority, applied 3850:Rotunda for the Charters of Freedom 3377:Incorporation of the Bill of Rights 2169:: 1087–1113 – via HeinOnline. 904:(1995), a federal law mandating a " 2941:Drafting and ratification timeline 2686:District of Columbia Voting Rights 2358:Exploring Constitutional Conflicts 2163:Saint Louis University Law Journal 1920:The Classical Liberal Constitution 1895:The Classical Liberal Constitution 1688:National League of Cities v. Usery 748:National League of Cities v. Usery 338:Drafting and ratification timeline 25: 2394:Constitution of the United States 2232:The Arkansas Historical Quarterly 2124:University of Illinois Law Review 1638:United States v. Darby Lumber Co. 1165:(2012), the Court ruled that the 1058:Kentucky and Virginia Resolutions 1027:Nullification (U.S. Constitution) 727:United States v. Darby Lumber Co. 650:and Massachusetts Representative 2797:Convention to propose amendments 579: 449: 437: 425: 60: 32:Tenth Amendment (disambiguation) 3924:Federalism in the United States 1487:Epps, Garrett (July 11, 2011). 1021:Nullification and interposition 923:Drug Enforcement Administration 3412:Separation of church and state 127:Amendments to the Constitution 1: 2916:Virginia Ratifying Convention 2180:Powell, Jefferson H. (1994). 2062:"Brown v. Board of Education" 1462:Bordewich, Fergus M. (2016). 1296:Seattle University Law Review 642:, with the completion of the 3919:United States Bill of Rights 3877:National Constitution Center 3675:Daniel of St. Thomas Jenifer 2974:Assemble and Petition Clause 1918:Epstein, Richard A. (2014). 1893:Epstein, Richard A. (2014). 745:(1985), the Court overruled 3748:Charles Cotesworth Pinckney 2802:State ratifying conventions 2739:Equal Opportunity to Govern 2734:Electoral College abolition 2661:Congressional Apportionment 2259:"The Irrepressible Myth of 1097:Brown v. Board of Education 970:Brown v. Board of Education 677:Necessary and Proper Clause 393:Preamble and Articles I–VII 289:Congressional Apportionment 3955: 2203:Farber, Daniel A. (2003). 2157:Bhagwat, Ashutosh (2008). 1520:The Founders' Constitution 1024: 891:(1942), in the context of 777:(1988), the Court said in 570:The Bill of Rights in the 531:1st United States Congress 504:United States Constitution 29: 3939:1791 in American politics 3201:Privileges and Immunities 3014:Congressional enforcement 2936:Rhode Island ratification 2827:Articles of Confederation 2792: 2769:Parental Rights amendment 2460: 2267:The Georgetown Law Review 2226:Aucoin, Brent J. (1996). 2131:: 387–412. Archived from 1760:New York v. United States 939:Controlled Substances Act 873:In the 20th century, the 837:New York v. United States 805:New York v. United States 753:National League of Cities 707:by the Supreme Court. In 667:delegated" was defeated, 602:Articles of Confederation 374:Reconstruction Amendments 3432:Unitary executive theory 3206:Privileges or Immunities 2921:New York Circular Letter 2911:Massachusetts Compromise 1613:United States v. Sprague 765:Fair Labor Standards Act 710:United States v. Sprague 432:United States portal 42:This article is part of 3352:Dormant Commerce Clause 3196:Presidential succession 2931:Fayetteville Convention 2926:Hillsborough Convention 2862:Three-fifths Compromise 2842:Philadelphia Convention 2832:Mount Vernon Conference 2719:Campaign finance reform 2257:Blackman, Josh (2019). 2143:– via HeinOnline. 2117:Farber, Daniel (1982). 1818:Printz v. United States 1713:South Carolina v. Baker 1134:Printz v. United States 824:Printz v. United States 774:South Carolina v. Baker 699:Judicial interpretation 3515:William Samuel Johnson 3387:Nondelegation doctrine 2959:Admission to the Union 2906:Anti-Federalist Papers 2857:Connecticut Compromise 2352:Tenth Amendment Center 2209:Wake Forest Law Review 1969:United States v. Lopez 1187:Principle of conferral 1142:cooperative federalism 1068:, when South Carolina 901:United States v. Lopez 737: 689: 610: 574: 564: 524:reserved to each state 518:, by stating that the 3722:Richard Dobbs Spaight 3191:Presidential Electors 3166:Original Jurisdiction 3106:Full Faith and Credit 2979:Assistance of Counsel 2900:The Federalist Papers 2729:Crittenden Compromise 1439:University of Chicago 1173:the states to expand 783:that an exception to 684: 596:Drafting and adoption 569: 414:Unratified Amendments 281:Unratified Amendments 70:Preamble and Articles 3934:1791 in American law 3891:A More Perfect Union 3867:Constitution Gardens 3788:Convention Secretary 3450:Convention President 3422:Symmetric federalism 3417:Separation of powers 3151:Necessary and Proper 3146:Natural-born citizen 3091:Freedom of the Press 3029:Copyright and Patent 3019:Contingent Elections 2837:Annapolis Convention 1788:South Dakota v. Dole 1066:Nullification Crisis 815:South Dakota v. Dole 730:, reads as follows: 617:Continental Congress 526:, or to the people. 54:of the United States 3898:Worldwide influence 3639:Gunning Bedford Jr. 3367:Executive privilege 3347:Criminal sentencing 3270:Title of Nobility ( 3261:Taxing and Spending 3161:Oath or Affirmation 3121:House Apportionment 2984:Case or Controversy 2867:Committee of Detail 2759:"Liberty" amendment 2724:Christian amendment 2186:Virginia Law Review 1117:Texas Heartbeat Act 810:Sandra Day O'Connor 648:Thomas Tudor Tucker 640:American Revolution 456:Politics portal 407:Amendments XI–XXVII 3552:William Livingston 3536:Alexander Hamilton 3342:Criminal procedure 3337:Constitutional law 3272:Foreign Emoluments 3236:State of the Union 3221:Self-Incrimination 3211:Recess appointment 3004:Compulsory Process 2666:Titles of Nobility 2299:Osterhoudt, John. 2088:"Little Rock Nine" 1944:Wickard v. Filburn 1541:Gibson v. Matthews 1101:massive resistance 1006:Marbury v. Madison 951:Wickard v. Filburn 915:Most recently, in 888:Wickard v. Filburn 656:federal government 575: 520:federal government 318:D.C. Voting Rights 296:Titles of Nobility 3906: 3905: 3872:Constitution Week 3857:Independence Mall 3845:National Archives 3803: 3802: 3618:Gouverneur Morris 3603:Thomas Fitzsimons 3583:Benjamin Franklin 3457:George Washington 3357:Enumerated powers 3332:Concurrent powers 3327:Balance of powers 3156:No Religious Test 3096:Freedom of Speech 2887:Independence Hall 2810: 2809: 2714:Bricker amendment 2647: 2646: 1994:Gonzales v. Raich 1929:978-0-674-72489-1 1904:978-0-674-72489-1 1404:(December 1980). 1268:Cooper, Charles. 1119:and the Missouri 918:Gonzales v. Raich 633:Richard Henry Lee 572:National Archives 492: 491: 16:(Redirected from 3946: 3753:Charles Pinckney 3562:William Paterson 3494:Nathaniel Gorham 3447: 3226:Speech or Debate 3054:Equal Protection 2764:Ludlow amendment 2749:Flag Desecration 2744:Federal Marriage 2709:Blaine amendment 2671:Corwin Amendment 2462: 2458: 2387: 2380: 2373: 2364: 2334: 2315: 2309: 2308: 2296: 2290: 2289: 2281: 2275: 2274: 2254: 2248: 2247: 2244:10.2307/40030963 2223: 2217: 2216: 2200: 2194: 2193: 2177: 2171: 2170: 2154: 2145: 2144: 2142: 2140: 2135:on June 22, 2018 2114: 2103: 2102: 2100: 2098: 2084: 2078: 2077: 2075: 2073: 2066:A&E Networks 2058: 2047: 2034: 2028: 2015: 2009: 1990: 1984: 1965: 1959: 1940: 1934: 1933: 1915: 1909: 1908: 1890: 1884: 1883: 1881: 1879: 1864: 1858: 1839: 1833: 1814: 1803: 1784: 1775: 1756: 1750: 1749: 1747: 1745: 1734: 1728: 1709: 1703: 1684: 1678: 1659: 1653: 1634: 1628: 1609: 1603: 1602: 1575:Yale Law Journal 1565: 1559: 1557: 1538: 1532: 1531: 1529: 1527: 1512: 1506: 1505: 1503: 1501: 1484: 1478: 1477: 1459: 1450: 1449: 1447: 1445: 1431: 1422: 1421: 1398: 1392: 1391: 1389: 1387: 1372: 1366: 1365: 1359: 1351: 1345: 1344: 1318: 1312: 1311: 1309: 1307: 1287: 1281: 1280: 1278: 1276: 1265: 1259: 1258: 1256: 1254: 1248:"Bill of Rights" 1243: 1237: 1236: 1234: 1232: 1218: 1202:Tenther movement 1121:Second Amendment 1054:Thomas Jefferson 990:Little Rock Nine 957:Supremacy Clause 927:medical cannabis 880:Great Depression 795:Since 1992, the 583: 536:Anti-Federalists 514:, also known as 506:, a part of the 484: 477: 470: 454: 453: 442: 441: 430: 429: 428: 64: 39: 21: 3954: 3953: 3949: 3948: 3947: 3945: 3944: 3943: 3909: 3908: 3907: 3902: 3837: 3831: 3799: 3795:William Jackson 3783: 3779:Abraham Baldwin 3762: 3731: 3727:Hugh Williamson 3705: 3684: 3658: 3649:Richard Bassett 3622: 3608:Jared Ingersoll 3571: 3567:Jonathan Dayton 3540: 3524: 3503: 3482: 3478:Nicholas Gilman 3461: 3436: 3402:Reserved powers 3382:Judicial review 3315: 3111:General Welfare 3034:Double Jeopardy 2945: 2872:List of Framers 2852:New Jersey Plan 2806: 2788: 2784:Victims' Rights 2704:Balanced budget 2690: 2643: 2572: 2544: 2523: 2447: 2396: 2391: 2356:Lindner, Doug. 2343: 2338: 2337: 2316: 2312: 2298: 2297: 2293: 2283: 2282: 2278: 2261:Cooper v. Aaron 2256: 2255: 2251: 2225: 2224: 2220: 2202: 2201: 2197: 2179: 2178: 2174: 2156: 2155: 2148: 2138: 2136: 2116: 2115: 2106: 2096: 2094: 2086: 2085: 2081: 2071: 2069: 2060: 2059: 2050: 2035: 2031: 2016: 2012: 1991: 1987: 1966: 1962: 1941: 1937: 1930: 1917: 1916: 1912: 1905: 1892: 1891: 1887: 1877: 1875: 1866: 1865: 1861: 1840: 1836: 1815: 1806: 1785: 1778: 1757: 1753: 1743: 1741: 1736: 1735: 1731: 1710: 1706: 1685: 1681: 1660: 1656: 1635: 1631: 1610: 1606: 1567: 1566: 1562: 1555: 1539: 1535: 1525: 1523: 1514: 1513: 1509: 1499: 1497: 1486: 1485: 1481: 1474: 1461: 1460: 1453: 1443: 1441: 1433: 1432: 1425: 1418: 1402:Watterson, John 1400: 1399: 1395: 1385: 1383: 1380:Yale Law School 1374: 1373: 1369: 1357: 1353: 1352: 1348: 1333: 1320: 1319: 1315: 1305: 1303: 1289: 1288: 1284: 1274: 1272: 1267: 1266: 1262: 1252: 1250: 1245: 1244: 1240: 1230: 1228: 1220: 1219: 1215: 1210: 1183: 1129: 1127:Federal funding 1109:Cooper v. Aaron 1074:tariffs of 1828 1046:judicial review 1033: 1025:Main articles: 1023: 964:Cooper v. Aaron 959: 931:Proposition 215 875:Commerce Clause 871: 869:Commerce Clause 793: 701: 671:Representative 598: 593: 592: 591: 589: 584: 559: 496:Tenth Amendment 488: 448: 436: 426: 424: 378: 322: 278: 277: 121: 53: 35: 28: 23: 22: 18:Tenth amendment 15: 12: 11: 5: 3952: 3950: 3942: 3941: 3936: 3931: 3929:States' rights 3926: 3921: 3911: 3910: 3904: 3903: 3901: 3900: 3895: 3887: 3879: 3874: 3869: 3864: 3859: 3854: 3853: 3852: 3841: 3839: 3833: 3832: 3830: 3829: 3824: 3819: 3811: 3809: 3805: 3804: 3801: 3800: 3798: 3797: 3791: 3789: 3785: 3784: 3782: 3781: 3776: 3770: 3768: 3764: 3763: 3761: 3760: 3755: 3750: 3745: 3739: 3737: 3736:South Carolina 3733: 3732: 3730: 3729: 3724: 3719: 3717:William Blount 3713: 3711: 3710:North Carolina 3707: 3706: 3704: 3703: 3698: 3692: 3690: 3686: 3685: 3683: 3682: 3680:Daniel Carroll 3677: 3672: 3666: 3664: 3660: 3659: 3657: 3656: 3651: 3646: 3644:John Dickinson 3641: 3636: 3630: 3628: 3624: 3623: 3621: 3620: 3615: 3610: 3605: 3600: 3595: 3590: 3588:Thomas Mifflin 3585: 3579: 3577: 3573: 3572: 3570: 3569: 3564: 3559: 3557:David Brearley 3554: 3548: 3546: 3542: 3541: 3539: 3538: 3532: 3530: 3526: 3525: 3523: 3522: 3517: 3511: 3509: 3505: 3504: 3502: 3501: 3496: 3490: 3488: 3484: 3483: 3481: 3480: 3475: 3469: 3467: 3463: 3462: 3460: 3459: 3453: 3451: 3444: 3438: 3437: 3435: 3434: 3429: 3427:Taxation power 3424: 3419: 3414: 3409: 3404: 3399: 3394: 3389: 3384: 3379: 3374: 3372:Implied powers 3369: 3364: 3359: 3354: 3349: 3344: 3339: 3334: 3329: 3323: 3321: 3320:Interpretation 3317: 3316: 3314: 3313: 3308: 3303: 3285: 3280: 3275: 3268: 3263: 3258: 3253: 3248: 3243: 3238: 3233: 3228: 3223: 3218: 3216:Recommendation 3213: 3208: 3203: 3198: 3193: 3188: 3183: 3178: 3173: 3168: 3163: 3158: 3153: 3148: 3143: 3138: 3133: 3128: 3123: 3118: 3113: 3108: 3103: 3101:Fugitive Slave 3098: 3093: 3088: 3083: 3078: 3071: 3069:Excessive Bail 3066: 3061: 3056: 3051: 3046: 3041: 3036: 3031: 3026: 3021: 3016: 3011: 3006: 3001: 2996: 2991: 2986: 2981: 2976: 2971: 2969:Appropriations 2966: 2961: 2955: 2953: 2947: 2946: 2944: 2943: 2938: 2933: 2928: 2923: 2918: 2913: 2908: 2903: 2896: 2895: 2894: 2889: 2884: 2879: 2874: 2869: 2864: 2859: 2854: 2849: 2839: 2834: 2829: 2824: 2818: 2816: 2812: 2811: 2808: 2807: 2805: 2804: 2799: 2793: 2790: 2789: 2787: 2786: 2781: 2779:Single subject 2776: 2771: 2766: 2761: 2756: 2751: 2746: 2741: 2736: 2731: 2726: 2721: 2716: 2711: 2706: 2700: 2698: 2692: 2691: 2689: 2688: 2683: 2678: 2673: 2668: 2663: 2657: 2655: 2649: 2648: 2645: 2644: 2642: 2641: 2636: 2631: 2626: 2621: 2616: 2611: 2606: 2601: 2596: 2591: 2586: 2580: 2578: 2574: 2573: 2571: 2570: 2565: 2560: 2554: 2552: 2550:Reconstruction 2546: 2545: 2543: 2542: 2537: 2531: 2529: 2525: 2524: 2522: 2521: 2516: 2511: 2506: 2501: 2496: 2491: 2486: 2481: 2476: 2470: 2468: 2466:Bill of Rights 2455: 2449: 2448: 2446: 2445: 2440: 2435: 2430: 2425: 2420: 2415: 2410: 2404: 2402: 2398: 2397: 2392: 2390: 2389: 2382: 2375: 2367: 2361: 2360: 2354: 2349: 2342: 2341:External links 2339: 2336: 2335: 2310: 2291: 2276: 2249: 2218: 2195: 2172: 2146: 2104: 2079: 2048: 2029: 2010: 1985: 1960: 1935: 1928: 1910: 1903: 1885: 1874:. May 14, 2018 1859: 1834: 1804: 1776: 1751: 1729: 1704: 1679: 1654: 1629: 1604: 1588:10.2307/797113 1582:(3): 541–665. 1560: 1533: 1507: 1479: 1473:978-1451691931 1472: 1451: 1423: 1416: 1393: 1382:Avalon Project 1367: 1346: 1331: 1313: 1282: 1260: 1238: 1212: 1211: 1209: 1206: 1205: 1204: 1199: 1197:States' rights 1194: 1189: 1182: 1179: 1128: 1125: 1105:states' rights 1095:of schools in 1082:Andrew Jackson 1041:compact theory 1022: 1019: 958: 955: 870: 867: 854:sports betting 833:Antonin Scalia 792: 789: 751:(1976). Under 700: 697: 660:implied powers 652:Elbridge Gerry 629:John Dickinson 597: 594: 586: 585: 578: 577: 576: 558: 555: 516:states' rights 508:Bill of Rights 490: 489: 487: 486: 479: 472: 464: 461: 460: 459: 458: 446: 444:Law portal 434: 419: 418: 417: 416: 410: 409: 403: 402: 400:Amendments I–X 396: 395: 387: 386: 380: 379: 377: 376: 371: 369:Bill of Rights 365: 364: 359: 353: 352: 347: 341: 340: 334: 331: 330: 324: 323: 321: 320: 315: 309: 308: 303: 298: 292: 291: 285: 276: 275: 270: 265: 260: 255: 249: 248: 243: 238: 233: 228: 222: 221: 216: 211: 206: 201: 196: 191: 185: 184: 179: 174: 169: 164: 159: 154: 149: 144: 139: 133: 130: 129: 123: 122: 120: 119: 114: 109: 104: 99: 94: 89: 83: 82: 81: 73: 72: 66: 65: 57: 56: 48: 47: 26: 24: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 3951: 3940: 3937: 3935: 3932: 3930: 3927: 3925: 3922: 3920: 3917: 3916: 3914: 3899: 3896: 3893: 3892: 3888: 3885: 3884: 3880: 3878: 3875: 3873: 3870: 3868: 3865: 3863: 3860: 3858: 3855: 3851: 3848: 3847: 3846: 3843: 3842: 3840: 3834: 3828: 3825: 3823: 3822:Jacob Shallus 3820: 3818: 3817: 3813: 3812: 3810: 3806: 3796: 3793: 3792: 3790: 3786: 3780: 3777: 3775: 3772: 3771: 3769: 3765: 3759: 3758:Pierce Butler 3756: 3754: 3751: 3749: 3746: 3744: 3743:John Rutledge 3741: 3740: 3738: 3734: 3728: 3725: 3723: 3720: 3718: 3715: 3714: 3712: 3708: 3702: 3701:James Madison 3699: 3697: 3694: 3693: 3691: 3687: 3681: 3678: 3676: 3673: 3671: 3670:James McHenry 3668: 3667: 3665: 3661: 3655: 3652: 3650: 3647: 3645: 3642: 3640: 3637: 3635: 3632: 3631: 3629: 3625: 3619: 3616: 3614: 3611: 3609: 3606: 3604: 3601: 3599: 3598:George Clymer 3596: 3594: 3593:Robert Morris 3591: 3589: 3586: 3584: 3581: 3580: 3578: 3574: 3568: 3565: 3563: 3560: 3558: 3555: 3553: 3550: 3549: 3547: 3543: 3537: 3534: 3533: 3531: 3527: 3521: 3520:Roger Sherman 3518: 3516: 3513: 3512: 3510: 3506: 3500: 3497: 3495: 3492: 3491: 3489: 3487:Massachusetts 3485: 3479: 3476: 3474: 3471: 3470: 3468: 3466:New Hampshire 3464: 3458: 3455: 3454: 3452: 3448: 3445: 3443: 3439: 3433: 3430: 3428: 3425: 3423: 3420: 3418: 3415: 3413: 3410: 3408: 3405: 3403: 3400: 3398: 3395: 3393: 3392:Plenary power 3390: 3388: 3385: 3383: 3380: 3378: 3375: 3373: 3370: 3368: 3365: 3363: 3362:Equal footing 3360: 3358: 3355: 3353: 3350: 3348: 3345: 3343: 3340: 3338: 3335: 3333: 3330: 3328: 3325: 3324: 3322: 3318: 3312: 3309: 3307: 3304: 3301: 3297: 3293: 3289: 3286: 3284: 3283:Trial by Jury 3281: 3279: 3276: 3273: 3269: 3267: 3264: 3262: 3259: 3257: 3254: 3252: 3249: 3247: 3244: 3242: 3239: 3237: 3234: 3232: 3229: 3227: 3224: 3222: 3219: 3217: 3214: 3212: 3209: 3207: 3204: 3202: 3199: 3197: 3194: 3192: 3189: 3187: 3184: 3182: 3179: 3177: 3174: 3172: 3169: 3167: 3164: 3162: 3159: 3157: 3154: 3152: 3149: 3147: 3144: 3142: 3139: 3137: 3136:Ineligibility 3134: 3132: 3131:Import-Export 3129: 3127: 3124: 3122: 3119: 3117: 3114: 3112: 3109: 3107: 3104: 3102: 3099: 3097: 3094: 3092: 3089: 3087: 3086:Free Exercise 3084: 3082: 3079: 3077: 3076: 3075:Ex Post Facto 3072: 3070: 3067: 3065: 3062: 3060: 3059:Establishment 3057: 3055: 3052: 3050: 3047: 3045: 3042: 3040: 3037: 3035: 3032: 3030: 3027: 3025: 3022: 3020: 3017: 3015: 3012: 3010: 3009:Confrontation 3007: 3005: 3002: 3000: 2997: 2995: 2992: 2990: 2987: 2985: 2982: 2980: 2977: 2975: 2972: 2970: 2967: 2965: 2962: 2960: 2957: 2956: 2954: 2952: 2948: 2942: 2939: 2937: 2934: 2932: 2929: 2927: 2924: 2922: 2919: 2917: 2914: 2912: 2909: 2907: 2904: 2902: 2901: 2897: 2893: 2892:Syng inkstand 2890: 2888: 2885: 2883: 2880: 2878: 2875: 2873: 2870: 2868: 2865: 2863: 2860: 2858: 2855: 2853: 2850: 2848: 2847:Virginia Plan 2845: 2844: 2843: 2840: 2838: 2835: 2833: 2830: 2828: 2825: 2823: 2820: 2819: 2817: 2813: 2803: 2800: 2798: 2795: 2794: 2791: 2785: 2782: 2780: 2777: 2775: 2774:School Prayer 2772: 2770: 2767: 2765: 2762: 2760: 2757: 2755: 2752: 2750: 2747: 2745: 2742: 2740: 2737: 2735: 2732: 2730: 2727: 2725: 2722: 2720: 2717: 2715: 2712: 2710: 2707: 2705: 2702: 2701: 2699: 2697: 2693: 2687: 2684: 2682: 2679: 2677: 2674: 2672: 2669: 2667: 2664: 2662: 2659: 2658: 2656: 2654: 2650: 2640: 2637: 2635: 2632: 2630: 2627: 2625: 2622: 2620: 2617: 2615: 2612: 2610: 2607: 2605: 2602: 2600: 2597: 2595: 2592: 2590: 2587: 2585: 2582: 2581: 2579: 2575: 2569: 2566: 2564: 2561: 2559: 2556: 2555: 2553: 2551: 2547: 2541: 2538: 2536: 2533: 2532: 2530: 2526: 2520: 2517: 2515: 2512: 2510: 2507: 2505: 2502: 2500: 2497: 2495: 2492: 2490: 2487: 2485: 2482: 2480: 2477: 2475: 2472: 2471: 2469: 2467: 2463: 2459: 2456: 2454: 2450: 2444: 2441: 2439: 2436: 2434: 2431: 2429: 2426: 2424: 2421: 2419: 2416: 2414: 2411: 2409: 2406: 2405: 2403: 2399: 2395: 2388: 2383: 2381: 2376: 2374: 2369: 2368: 2365: 2359: 2355: 2353: 2350: 2348: 2345: 2344: 2340: 2332: 2329: 2325: 2321: 2320: 2314: 2311: 2306: 2302: 2295: 2292: 2287: 2280: 2277: 2272: 2268: 2264: 2262: 2253: 2250: 2245: 2241: 2237: 2233: 2229: 2222: 2219: 2214: 2210: 2206: 2199: 2196: 2191: 2187: 2183: 2176: 2173: 2168: 2164: 2160: 2153: 2151: 2147: 2134: 2130: 2126: 2125: 2120: 2113: 2111: 2109: 2105: 2093: 2089: 2083: 2080: 2067: 2063: 2057: 2055: 2053: 2049: 2045: 2042: 2038: 2033: 2030: 2026: 2023: 2019: 2014: 2011: 2007: 2004: 2000: 1996: 1995: 1989: 1986: 1982: 1979: 1975: 1971: 1970: 1964: 1961: 1957: 1954: 1950: 1946: 1945: 1939: 1936: 1931: 1925: 1921: 1914: 1911: 1906: 1900: 1896: 1889: 1886: 1873: 1869: 1863: 1860: 1856: 1853: 1849: 1845: 1844: 1838: 1835: 1831: 1828: 1824: 1820: 1819: 1813: 1811: 1809: 1805: 1801: 1798: 1794: 1790: 1789: 1783: 1781: 1777: 1773: 1770: 1766: 1762: 1761: 1755: 1752: 1739: 1733: 1730: 1726: 1723: 1719: 1715: 1714: 1708: 1705: 1701: 1698: 1694: 1690: 1689: 1683: 1680: 1676: 1673: 1669: 1665: 1664: 1658: 1655: 1651: 1648: 1644: 1640: 1639: 1633: 1630: 1626: 1623: 1619: 1615: 1614: 1608: 1605: 1601: 1597: 1593: 1589: 1585: 1581: 1577: 1576: 1571: 1564: 1561: 1553: 1549: 1546: 1542: 1537: 1534: 1521: 1517: 1511: 1508: 1496: 1495: 1490: 1483: 1480: 1475: 1469: 1465: 1458: 1456: 1452: 1440: 1436: 1430: 1428: 1424: 1419: 1417:9780819109446 1413: 1409: 1408: 1403: 1397: 1394: 1381: 1377: 1371: 1368: 1363: 1356: 1350: 1347: 1342: 1338: 1334: 1332:0-313-31372-5 1328: 1324: 1317: 1314: 1301: 1297: 1293: 1286: 1283: 1275:September 11, 1271: 1264: 1261: 1249: 1242: 1239: 1231:September 20, 1227: 1223: 1217: 1214: 1207: 1203: 1200: 1198: 1195: 1193: 1190: 1188: 1185: 1184: 1180: 1178: 1176: 1172: 1168: 1164: 1163: 1157: 1155: 1151: 1147: 1143: 1138: 1136: 1135: 1126: 1124: 1122: 1118: 1112: 1110: 1106: 1102: 1098: 1094: 1093:desegregation 1089: 1087: 1083: 1079: 1075: 1071: 1067: 1063: 1059: 1055: 1051: 1050:James Madison 1047: 1042: 1037: 1032: 1031:Interposition 1028: 1020: 1018: 1016: 1012: 1008: 1007: 1001: 997: 995: 991: 987: 982: 980: 976: 972: 971: 966: 965: 956: 954: 952: 948: 944: 940: 936: 932: 928: 924: 920: 919: 913: 911: 907: 906:gun-free zone 903: 902: 896: 894: 890: 889: 883: 881: 876: 868: 866: 864: 860: 855: 851: 847: 846: 840: 838: 834: 830: 826: 825: 819: 817: 816: 811: 807: 806: 800: 798: 797:Supreme Court 791:Commandeering 790: 788: 786: 782: 781: 776: 775: 769: 766: 762: 758: 754: 750: 749: 744: 743: 736: 731: 729: 728: 723: 718: 716: 715:Supreme Court 712: 711: 706: 698: 696: 693: 688: 683: 680: 678: 674: 673:Roger Sherman 670: 665: 664:James Madison 661: 657: 653: 649: 645: 641: 636: 634: 630: 626: 622: 618: 614: 609: 605: 603: 595: 588: 582: 573: 568: 563: 556: 554: 552: 548: 544: 539: 537: 532: 527: 525: 521: 517: 513: 509: 505: 501: 497: 485: 480: 478: 473: 471: 466: 465: 463: 462: 457: 452: 447: 445: 440: 435: 433: 423: 422: 421: 420: 415: 412: 411: 408: 405: 404: 401: 398: 397: 394: 391: 390: 389: 388: 385: 381: 375: 372: 370: 367: 366: 363: 362:Republicanism 360: 358: 355: 354: 351: 348: 346: 343: 342: 339: 336: 335: 333: 332: 329: 325: 319: 316: 314: 311: 310: 307: 304: 302: 299: 297: 294: 293: 290: 287: 286: 283: 282: 274: 271: 269: 266: 264: 261: 259: 256: 254: 251: 250: 247: 244: 242: 239: 237: 234: 232: 229: 227: 224: 223: 220: 217: 215: 212: 210: 207: 205: 202: 200: 197: 195: 192: 190: 187: 186: 183: 180: 178: 175: 173: 170: 168: 165: 163: 160: 158: 155: 153: 150: 148: 145: 143: 140: 138: 135: 134: 132: 131: 128: 124: 118: 115: 113: 110: 108: 105: 103: 100: 98: 95: 93: 90: 88: 85: 84: 80: 77: 76: 75: 74: 71: 67: 63: 59: 58: 55: 49: 45: 41: 40: 37: 33: 19: 3889: 3881: 3814: 3613:James Wilson 3576:Pennsylvania 3473:John Langdon 3231:Speedy Trial 3073: 2964:Appointments 2898: 2681:Equal Rights 2577:20th century 2518: 2333: (2012). 2317: 2313: 2304: 2294: 2279: 2270: 2266: 2260: 2252: 2235: 2231: 2221: 2212: 2208: 2198: 2189: 2185: 2175: 2166: 2162: 2137:. Retrieved 2133:the original 2128: 2122: 2095:. Retrieved 2082: 2070:. Retrieved 2032: 2013: 2008: (2005). 1992: 1988: 1983: (1995). 1967: 1963: 1958: (1942). 1942: 1938: 1919: 1913: 1894: 1888: 1876:. Retrieved 1871: 1862: 1841: 1837: 1832: (1997). 1816: 1802: (1987). 1786: 1774: (1992). 1758: 1754: 1742:. Retrieved 1732: 1711: 1707: 1686: 1682: 1677: (1985). 1661: 1657: 1652: (1941). 1636: 1632: 1627: (1931). 1611: 1607: 1599: 1579: 1573: 1563: 1540: 1536: 1524:. Retrieved 1519: 1510: 1498:. Retrieved 1494:The Atlantic 1492: 1482: 1463: 1444:December 16, 1442:. Retrieved 1406: 1396: 1386:February 15, 1384:. Retrieved 1370: 1361: 1349: 1322: 1316: 1304:. Retrieved 1299: 1295: 1285: 1273:. Retrieved 1263: 1251:. Retrieved 1241: 1229:. Retrieved 1216: 1160: 1158: 1154:drinking age 1139: 1132: 1130: 1113: 1108: 1096: 1090: 1062:19th century 1056:drafted the 1038: 1034: 1014: 1010: 1004: 1002: 998: 993: 986:Orval Faubus 983: 978: 974: 968: 962: 960: 950: 946: 942: 916: 914: 909: 899: 897: 893:World War II 886: 884: 872: 862: 858: 843: 841: 836: 822: 820: 813: 803: 801: 794: 784: 778: 772: 770: 756: 752: 746: 740: 738: 733: 725: 719: 708: 702: 694: 690: 685: 681: 637: 625:James Wilson 613:Thomas Burke 611: 607: 599: 561: 547:originalists 540: 528: 499: 495: 493: 313:Equal Rights 279: 181: 52:Constitution 36: 3774:William Few 3654:Jacob Broom 3634:George Read 3508:Connecticut 3442:Signatories 3292:Legislative 3266:Territorial 3186:Presentment 3171:Origination 3126:Impeachment 3081:Extradition 3049:Engagements 3039:Due Process 2989:Citizenship 2676:Child Labor 2046: (1954) 2027: (1958) 1857: (2018) 1727: (1988) 1702: (1976) 1625:716, 733-34 1306:October 29, 1150:speed limit 973:(1954). In 713:(1932) the 669:Connecticut 543:textualists 500:Amendment X 306:Child Labor 3913:Categories 3886:(painting) 3838:and legacy 3696:John Blair 3545:New Jersey 3499:Rufus King 3397:Preemption 3311:War Powers 3246:Suspension 3064:Exceptions 2754:Human Life 2653:Unratified 2453:Amendments 1872:SCOTUSblog 1208:References 933:, despite 925:after her 912:decision. 638:After the 512:federalism 357:Federalism 345:Convention 3407:Saxbe fix 3296:Executive 3251:Take Care 3241:Supremacy 3116:Guarantee 3044:Elections 2815:Formation 2528:1795–1804 1086:Civil War 551:tautology 502:) to the 384:Full text 3689:Virginia 3663:Maryland 3627:Delaware 3529:New York 3306:Vicinage 3300:Judicial 3024:Contract 2994:Commerce 2882:Printing 2696:Proposed 2408:Preamble 2401:Articles 2139:June 21, 1650:100, 124 1552:6th Cir. 1526:June 19, 1500:June 26, 1341:69992386 1253:March 7, 1181:See also 1175:Medicaid 1070:declared 935:cannabis 859:New York 644:drafting 79:Preamble 44:a series 3836:Display 3808:Related 3767:Georgia 3288:Vesting 3256:Takings 3141:Militia 2999:Compact 2951:Clauses 2877:Signing 2822:History 2097:May 25, 2092:History 2072:May 25, 1878:May 15, 1744:May 25, 1550:, 537 ( 1362:GPO.gov 1171:coerced 943:affects 761:Framers 350:Signing 328:History 3894:(film) 3278:Treaty 3181:Postal 3176:Pardon 2322:, 2305:Reason 2068:. 2009 1997:, 1972:, 1947:, 1926:  1901:  1846:, 1821:, 1791:, 1763:, 1740:. 1988 1716:, 1691:, 1666:, 1641:, 1616:, 1596:797113 1594:  1556:  1543:, 926 1470:  1414:  1339:  1329:  1015:Cooper 910:Garcia 863:Printz 785:Garcia 757:Garcia 705:truism 301:Corwin 46:on the 2326: 2238:(2). 2039: 2020: 2001: 1976: 1951: 1850: 1825: 1795: 1767: 1720: 1695: 1670: 1645: 1620: 1592:JSTOR 1358:(PDF) 1011:Brown 994:Brown 979:Brown 975:Brown 947:could 780:dicta 722:labor 273:XXVII 253:XXIII 226:XVIII 2328:U.S. 2273:(5). 2141:2018 2129:1982 2099:2018 2074:2018 2041:U.S. 2022:U.S. 2003:U.S. 1978:U.S. 1953:U.S. 1924:ISBN 1899:ISBN 1880:2018 1852:U.S. 1827:U.S. 1797:U.S. 1769:U.S. 1746:2018 1722:U.S. 1697:U.S. 1672:U.S. 1647:U.S. 1622:U.S. 1558:..." 1545:F.2d 1528:2015 1502:2013 1468:ISBN 1446:2007 1412:ISBN 1388:2020 1337:OCLC 1327:ISBN 1308:2015 1277:2014 1255:2016 1233:2010 1146:IDEA 1078:1832 1076:and 1072:the 1052:and 1029:and 861:and 557:Text 545:and 494:The 268:XXVI 258:XXIV 246:XXII 219:XVII 199:XIII 172:VIII 2443:VII 2423:III 2331:519 2324:567 2271:107 2240:doi 2044:483 2037:347 2018:358 1999:545 1981:549 1974:514 1956:111 1949:317 1848:584 1830:898 1823:521 1800:203 1793:483 1772:144 1765:505 1725:505 1718:485 1700:833 1693:426 1675:528 1668:469 1643:312 1618:282 1584:doi 1580:104 1548:532 1159:In 961:In 898:In 885:In 842:In 821:In 802:In 771:In 739:In 263:XXV 241:XXI 231:XIX 214:XVI 204:XIV 194:XII 167:VII 147:III 117:VII 97:III 3915:: 3298:/ 3294:/ 2639:27 2634:26 2629:25 2624:24 2619:23 2614:22 2609:21 2604:20 2599:19 2594:18 2589:17 2584:16 2568:15 2563:14 2558:13 2540:12 2535:11 2519:10 2438:VI 2428:IV 2418:II 2303:. 2269:. 2265:. 2236:55 2234:. 2230:. 2213:38 2211:. 2207:. 2190:80 2188:. 2184:. 2167:52 2165:. 2161:. 2149:^ 2127:. 2121:. 2107:^ 2090:. 2064:. 2051:^ 1870:. 1807:^ 1779:^ 1598:. 1590:. 1578:. 1572:. 1518:. 1491:. 1454:^ 1437:. 1426:^ 1378:. 1360:. 1335:. 1298:. 1294:. 1224:. 1137:. 679:. 662:. 627:, 236:XX 209:XV 189:XI 177:IX 162:VI 152:IV 142:II 112:VI 102:IV 92:II 3302:) 3290:( 3274:) 2514:9 2509:8 2504:7 2499:6 2494:5 2489:4 2484:3 2479:2 2474:1 2433:V 2413:I 2386:e 2379:t 2372:v 2307:. 2288:. 2263:" 2246:. 2242:: 2215:. 2192:. 2101:. 2076:. 2025:1 2006:1 1932:. 1907:. 1882:. 1855:_ 1748:. 1586:: 1530:. 1504:. 1476:. 1448:. 1420:. 1390:. 1343:. 1310:. 1300:7 1279:. 1257:. 1235:. 604:: 498:( 483:e 476:t 469:v 284:: 182:X 157:V 137:I 107:V 87:I 34:. 20:)

Index

Tenth amendment
Tenth Amendment (disambiguation)
a series
Constitution
of the United States


Preamble and Articles
Preamble
I
II
III
IV
V
VI
VII
Amendments to the Constitution
I
II
III
IV
V
VI
VII
VIII
IX
X
XI
XII
XIII
XIV
XV

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.