Knowledge (XXG)

California v. Texas

Source đź“ť

670:, the Supreme Court concluded that Texas and other plaintiff states did not have standing to bring the initial challenge of the individual mandate, as those states could not show a past or future injury related to the mandate provision. The Court's decision did not address the constitutionality question of the individual mandate. Breyer wrote in the majority opinion that Texas and the other plaintiff states had failed to show standing as "Unsurprisingly, the states have not demonstrated that an unenforceable mandate will cause their residents to enroll in valuable benefits programs that they would otherwise forgo". 485:
is still impermissible under the Interstate Commerce Clause—meaning the Individual Mandate is unconstitutional." He then further reasoned that the individual mandate is an essential part of the entire law, and thus was not severable, making the entire law unconstitutional. O'Connor's decision rendered the ACA unconstitutional but did not immediately overturn the law, granting a stay pending the resolution of the case on appeal. Among reaction to this decision was California and several other states, vowing to lead a challenge to the ruling.
51: 572: 739:, whose office brought one of the original lawsuits leading to the Supreme Court appeal, said that he will continue to seek legal means to challenge the ACA. "If the government is allowed to mislead its citizens, pass a massive government takeover of healthcare, and yet still survive after Supreme Court review, this spells doom for the principles of Federalism and limited government." Republicans such as Sen. 422:. Trump had campaigned on the promise of replacing the ACA once in office, and repealing the law was one of the early targets of the Republicans, but early efforts failed by mid 2017 due to in-party disputes, specifically the deciding vote which was to come from Senator John McCain who denied the Republican Party due to the fact that a promised replacement plan was not forthcoming. 557:. The Fifth Circuit also asked the District Court to consider a suggestion that the Justice Department had included in one of its briefs where the ACA may be invalid only in those states that had challenged it. As questions remained to the degree to which the ACA was unconstitutional, the ACA remained in enforcement following the decision. 501:, making it a critical issue for either party. Four additional states joined California's challenge by February 2019, bringing the number to 21. The Democrat-controlled House of Representatives following the 2018 election also joined in the defense. The Department of Justice filed a brief in support of the defendants (Texas 633:
After Democrats won control of Congress through the 2020 elections (and associated runoffs in 2021), speculation arose that the Democratic-controlled Congress would follow President Joe Biden's desire to reinstate the individual mandate. This would effectively nullify any ruling against Obamacare, as
484:
released his opinion on the case, affirming that without the individual mandate, the whole of the ACA was unconstitutional, going farther than the Justice Department had even indicated. O'Connor wrote that the "Individual Mandate can no longer be fairly read as an exercise of Congress's Tax Power and
595:
to the Supreme Court by January 3, 2020, in response to the Fifth Circuit's decision. The filing asked for the case to be heard on an expedited schedule, "because of the practical importance of the questions presented for review and the pressing need for their swift resolution by this Court". Texas
476:
told the district court in June 2018 that it mostly agreed with the general basis of the lawsuit, in that without the individual mandate, certain provisions of the ACA were invalidated such as the protections it had provided for those with pre-existing conditions, and would not defend those factors
548:
The Fifth Circuit issued its ruling on December 18, 2019. The 2–1 decision, joined by Judges Elrod and Engelhardt, upheld in principle District Judge O'Connor's decision that with the elimination of the individual mandate, parts of the ACA were potentially unconstitutional. However, the decision
700:
said that by avoiding the constitutional question of the individual mandate and instead deciding on standing, the Supreme Court "made it much harder for anyone to get that issue into the courts going forward. In essence, they sucked the oxygen out of the ACA's continuing constitutional fire."
540:
focused on the constitutional challenge, the intent of Congress when they wrote and passed the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act, and on the matter of standing. Observers believed the case would be decided upholding O'Connor's ruling due to how the questioning fell, with Judges Elrod and Engelhardt, both
614:
The Supreme Court refused to hear the case on an expedited schedule for the 2019–2020 term, but did agree, on March 2, 2020, to hear the case during the 2020–2021 term, reviewing not only the severability factors but the standing issue raised by the Fifth Circuit. The Court consolidated both
634:
the case is predicated upon a $ 0 individual mandate penalty. The Department of Justice under Biden did submit a new amicus brief in February 2021 following the oral hearings asserting that they now believe the ACA is constitutional and the mandate is severable from the rest of the ACA.
363:
In a 7–2 decision issued on June 17, 2021, the Supreme Court ruled that Texas and other states that initially challenged the individual mandate did not have standing, as they had not shown past or future injury related to the provision. The Supreme Court otherwise did not rule on the
396:
penalty for those that did not have health insurance, otherwise known as the "individual mandate". Passage of the ACA was controversial, and remained an issue that was divided along political lines, with Democrats seeing the law as promoting the public good and
451:
in federal spending, although it would cause premium rates to go up for some individual taxpayers. Political commentators recognized that the removal of the individual mandate penalty was a partial victory for the Republicans who were trying to repeal the ACA.
716:
stated that " decision means that all Americans continue to have a right to access affordable care, free of discrimination." Barack Obama stated that "The principle of universal coverage has been established," and that the law "is here to stay."
176:
Plaintiffs do not have standing to challenge §5000A(a)'s minimum essential coverage provision because they have not shown a past or future injury fairly traceable to defendants' conduct enforcing the specific statutory provision they attack as
731:
also heralded the ruling, with Schumer stating "For more than a decade, the assault on our health care law was relentless from Republicans in Congress, from the executive branch itself and from Republican attorneys general in the courts."
4829: 4092: 2615: 566: 2647: 4068: 2077: 505:) in March 2019, now in full agreement with O'Connor's decision that the ACA as a whole was unconstitutional without the individual mandate, and would support Texas in defending the challenge. Briefs were also filed by the 4265: 549:
remanded the case back to the district court, arguing that O'Connor's conclusion that the whole of the ACA was unconstitutional may be flawed. The Fifth Circuit decision asked the District Court to consider the concept of
901: 4669: 332:
concluded that this individual mandate was a critical provision of the ACA and that, with a penalty amount equal to zero, some or all of the ACA was potentially unconstitutional as an improper use of Congress's
4621: 3371: 708:
in a statement called the ruling "a major victory for all Americans," affirming that "healthcare is a right and not a privilege" and that "it is time move forward and keep building on this landmark law."
6336: 4837: 461: 329: 4132: 4002: 497:, as the Justice Department had indicated it would not challenge the ruling. At this point, it was recognized that the case was likely bound for the Supreme Court, and would land in the midst of the 642:
The Court issued its decision on June 17, 2021. In a 7–2 ruling, the Court reversed the Fifth Circuit's ruling and remanded the case for further review. In the majority opinion written by Justice
4981: 4949: 4629: 673:
Justice Thomas also wrote a concurring opinion. While Thomas agreed with the dissenting opinion that the Court had erred in how it handled the ACA in the past, he wrote that the decision in
6306: 2786: 6331: 4637: 4233: 5998: 5929: 3066: 2348: 403: 6296: 5058: 4390: 4100: 3301: 4709: 2415: 6076: 4353: 4193: 2519: 1837: 718: 103: 4933: 4519: 4060: 3355: 3269: 2994: 2890: 2679: 494: 439:. Among many other tax cuts, the Act eliminated the individual mandate requirement from the ACA by reducing penalty amount related to the required amount of health coverage to 345: 5745: 4845: 4556: 1270: 4565: 4415: 2575: 401:
seeing it as a tax burden. The law had been challenged in courts multiple times, with the Supreme Court having seen two cases previously. In 2012, the Court ruled 5–4 in
5554: 5225: 4869: 4805: 4108: 5241: 5083: 5037: 4116: 2663: 2223: 600:
and allow it to proceed through the normal judicial process, but that should it accept the case, to review and affirm the ruling that the ACA is now unconstitutional.
4605: 1677: 630:, along with the three more liberal Justices, appeared to accept the severability arguments of the individual mandate that would leave the rest of the ACA in place. 344:, the federal government had declined to challenge the lower court ruling, leading California and several other states to intervene and appeal the ruling, which the 6351: 5005: 4781: 4337: 4031: 3746: 3661: 2810: 506: 291: 5013: 4717: 4503: 4423: 3948: 3807: 3669: 1216: 348:
granted. The Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit upheld the ruling that the individual mandate was unconstitutional, but determined that the mandate might be
6291: 6046: 6018: 5949: 5765: 5629: 5384: 5262: 5189: 5182: 4909: 4431: 4273: 3099: 2938: 2256: 2163: 2110: 2041: 2037: 1988: 1984: 1935: 1931: 1917: 5498: 3940: 6356: 5067: 4535: 4345: 4217: 4185: 3876: 3251: 2858: 771:
Internal Revenue Code sec. 5000A(c)(2)(B)(iii), as amended by sec. 11081(a)(1) and (a)(2) of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act, Pub. L. No. 115-97 (Dec. 22, 2017).
696:
Legal experts believed that the decision based on lack of standing would make it difficult for any other party to challenge the ACA further. Law professor
2970: 6361: 4853: 2802: 2655: 464:
challenging the constitutionality of the ACA following the removal of the individual mandate from the Internal Revenue Code. The plaintiffs in the suit,
6099: 5974: 5826: 4257: 3980: 2623: 2292: 1402: 4613: 4511: 3754: 3738: 3730: 725: 596:
and the other states also filed a petition in February 2020 for the Supreme Court, asking them to deny the expedited review of the case as it was not
1731: 4925: 4645: 4399: 3791: 3637: 3629: 2551: 6346: 6234: 6115: 5886: 5787: 5738: 4941: 3932: 3557: 2687: 2607: 2300: 4321: 2842: 929: 611:, filed a brief arguing that the individual mandate is unconstitutional and that, because of this, the rest of the law must be struck down, too. 352:
from the rest of the ACA. Both California and Texas petitioned review of the Fifth's decision to the Supreme Court; the Court consolidated both
4893: 4543: 3972: 2850: 2431: 1646: 985: 604: 468:, argued that since the penalty related to the individual mandate was seen as core provision of the ACA as determined by the Supreme Court in 312:(ACA), colloquially known as Obamacare. It was the third such challenge to the ACA seen by the Supreme Court since its enactment. The case in 6341: 5698: 5458: 5029: 4997: 4797: 4789: 4581: 4361: 4329: 4209: 4164: 4084: 2874: 2770: 2399: 3677: 688:. Alito stated that the individual mandate was "clearly unconstitutional" and criticized the majority opinion for "judicial inventiveness". 4463: 4377: 4076: 4010: 3799: 3653: 3645: 3018: 2730: 2559: 2511: 1905: 1617: 1589: 1507: 1561: 524:
Prior to the July 2019 oral hearings, the judges in the Fifth Circuit raised the question of whether California and the other states had
5075: 5021: 4297: 4124: 3831: 3774: 3206: 2535: 510: 473: 1087: 6196: 5731: 4885: 4369: 4249: 4140: 2978: 2962: 2567: 2527: 2479: 2069: 2008: 1955: 1914: 55: 5538: 4861: 4733: 4573: 3924: 3908: 3762: 2914: 2866: 2754: 2631: 6242: 1533: 5706: 4901: 4813: 4589: 4439: 2503: 2487: 2463: 817: 415: 398: 373: 5319: 4447: 4305: 4039: 2455: 2423: 2130: 393: 3293: 1011: 5913: 5530: 3496: 3074: 2439: 2308: 1059: 518: 2906: 1159: 541:
appointed under Republican presidents, asking the bulk of the questions, while Senior Judge King, appointed under Democrat
6261: 6150: 5522: 5434: 4022: 3815: 3721: 3194: 2671: 2183: 743:
criticized the decision and the ACA, suggesting that Republicans would focus on policymaking. In a joint statement, Reps.
436: 317: 845: 320:
and the change to the tax penalty amount for Americans without required insurance that reduced the "individual mandate" (
28: 6123: 5990: 5608: 4281: 3285: 2922: 2471: 1430: 554: 498: 5108: 4877: 4201: 3685: 2826: 2599: 2231: 1703: 444: 341: 305: 418:
held control of both the House and Senate and gained control of the Executive branch with the election of President
6055: 6032: 5773: 5506: 5161: 4653: 3042: 2591: 2495: 2407: 2252: 1374: 873: 782: 408: 334: 287: 6091: 5966: 5921: 5650: 5642: 5153: 4495: 3900: 3847: 3050: 3002: 2898: 2834: 2284: 5514: 6177: 6107: 5982: 5849: 5442: 5335: 5287: 5045: 4677: 4471: 4241: 3823: 3783: 3701: 2175: 1898: 514: 385: 5546: 1799: 957: 5958: 5857: 5137: 4749: 4527: 4455: 3868: 3839: 2382: 2340: 2316: 2268: 2138: 2106: 1590:"Justice Department tells Supreme Court it thinks Obamacare is constitutional, reversing Trump-era position" 1479: 1092: 1243: 1187: 87: 5682: 5474: 4965: 4765: 4685: 3964: 3884: 3709: 3549: 3331: 3034: 3010: 83: 1298: 472:, its removal should make the entire law an unconstitutional exercise of Congressional taxing power. The 6215: 5802: 5658: 5121: 4176: 3916: 3859: 3565: 3516: 3391: 3231: 3223: 3169: 3131: 2946: 2778: 2543: 2447: 1841: 533: 321: 98: 5466: 2954: 1131: 677:
was correct as Texas and the other states did not show any injury pending from the individual mandate.
622:
Oral arguments were heard on November 10, 2020. Observers to the arguments believed that Chief Justice
5810: 5690: 5587: 5129: 4989: 4725: 4701: 4661: 3621: 3488: 3339: 2332: 2122: 1764: 1451: 1407: 1064: 5674: 5407: 5351: 5327: 4597: 3605: 3589: 3573: 3424: 3323: 2930: 2794: 2000: 1891: 1848: 1435: 1346: 1275: 934: 906: 529: 477:
in court. However, the Justice Department still believed certain provisions of the ACA were valid.
309: 6301: 6169: 6142: 5397: 5311: 5303: 5233: 4821: 4289: 3892: 3693: 3597: 3581: 3464: 3456: 3363: 3347: 3113: 2882: 2324: 2204: 2159: 1769: 1484: 1456: 1379: 1351: 1303: 962: 850: 553:, since the individual mandate aspect was not apparently tied to other parts of the ACA like the 493:
By early January 2019, 17 states led by California filed an appeal of O'Connor's decision to the
1088:"Federal Judge Rules Affordable Care Act Is Unconstitutional Without Insurance-Coverage Penalty" 5834: 5600: 5450: 5209: 5145: 4693: 4487: 4407: 4156: 3525: 3504: 3400: 3277: 3178: 3058: 2818: 2639: 2391: 1963: 1875: 1774: 667: 608: 244: 5905: 5878: 5818: 5426: 5295: 5201: 4917: 4773: 4741: 4225: 3533: 3416: 3239: 3156: 2762: 2722: 2706: 2276: 2216: 2053: 1621: 1251: 1244:"ACA Round-Up: New Uninsured Data, Resources On 1332, Briefs In Texas | Health Affairs Blog" 1197: 481: 381: 380:. Among much of its provisions, it provided programs for states to provide free or low-cost 5666: 5380: 4957: 4757: 4313: 3541: 3472: 3448: 3408: 3261: 2986: 2738: 2714: 2583: 2369: 2085: 2016: 1857: 663: 655: 651: 627: 537: 236: 220: 200: 1883: 1117: 407:
that the individual mandate was constitutional as a granted power of Congress under the
392:. ACA encouraged all Americans to have health insurance and as part of this, created an 141: 5723: 5562: 5490: 5343: 5279: 4973: 3956: 3440: 3432: 3379: 3186: 3026: 2061: 1192: 752: 744: 713: 643: 525: 208: 1255: 1201: 6325: 5482: 5217: 4479: 3992: 3613: 3480: 3313: 3215: 1947: 1164: 748: 740: 728: 710: 697: 1041: 615:
California's and Texas's petitions (Dockets 19-840 and 19–1019, respectively) under
130: 5359: 4148: 1328: 1016: 721: 685: 681: 647: 623: 571: 550: 542: 419: 377: 349: 325: 232: 212: 192: 151: 17: 3123: 1642: 902:"Senate Republicans' effort to 'repeal and replace' Obamacare all but collapses" 659: 224: 127: 1732:"Biden applauds Supreme Court ACA decision, says it is a victory for Americans" 1217:"Challenge to Obamacare could leave 20 million people without health insurance" 818:"Supreme Court dismisses challenge to Affordable Care Act, leaving it in place" 435:
By December 2017, President Trump signed into law a large tax relief bill, the
4051: 2746: 1708: 736: 161: 4830:
Florida Prepaid Postsecondary Education Expense Board v. College Savings Bank
4093:
College Savings Bank v. Florida Prepaid Postsecondary Education Expense Board
1778: 1160:"17 attorneys general are appealing the court decision overturning Obamacare" 528:
to bring the challenge to the original suit. The oral hearings before Judges
1299:"Appeals Court Seems Skeptical About Constitutionality of Obamacare Mandate" 1221: 1045: 705: 134: 4069:
San Francisco Arts & Athletics, Inc. v. United States Olympic Committee
2616:
Oregon Waste Systems, Inc. v. Department of Environmental Quality of Oregon
567:
Constitutional challenges to the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act
2078:
Arizona State Legislature v. Arizona Independent Redistricting Commission
1866: 1332: 878: 597: 389: 155: 2648:
United Haulers Ass'n v. Oneida-Herkimer Solid Waste Management Authority
460:
In February 2018, Texas led 19 other states in a federal lawsuit in the
74:
California, et al. v. Texas, et al.; Texas, et al. v. California, et al.
1803: 1681: 261:
Breyer, joined by Roberts, Thomas, Sotomayor, Kagan, Kavanaugh, Barrett
443:
starting in 2019. The elimination of the penalty was estimated by the
4670:
Walker Process Equipment, Inc. v. Food Machinery & Chemical Corp.
4266:
Quality King Distributors Inc., v. L'anza Research International Inc.
1815: 1508:"Justices will hear argument in ACA case one week after Election Day" 1347:"Obamacare Insurance Mandate Is Struck Down by Federal Appeals Court" 2971:
Hodel v. Virginia Surface Mining & Reclamation Association, Inc.
4622:
Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co. v. Supermarket Equipment Corp.
3372:
Consolidated Safety-Valve Co. v. Crosby Steam Gauge & Valve Co.
1403:"GOP states tell Supreme Court to wait on reviewing ObamaCare case" 27:
This article is about the Supreme Court case. For the rivalry, see
1651: 1431:"Trump administration asks Supreme Court to strike down Obamacare" 1012:"The Federal Government Abandons the Most Popular Part of the ACA" 846:"Supreme Court Upholds Health Care Law, 5-4, in Victory for Obama" 570: 755:
criticized the ACA and called on Congress to improve healthcare.
1678:"U.S. Supreme Court rejects Trump-backed challenge to Obamacare" 1594: 1566: 1538: 148: 6280: 6074: 5763: 5727: 5627: 5585: 5378: 5260: 5180: 5106: 4838:
J. E. M. Ag Supply, Inc. v. Pioneer Hi-Bred International, Inc.
3154: 3097: 2367: 2250: 2202: 2157: 2104: 2035: 1982: 1929: 1887: 900:
Eilperin, Juliet; Sullivan, Sean; O'Keefe, Ed (July 18, 2017).
462:
United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas
50: 4133:
Lexmark International, Inc. v. Static Control Components, Inc.
4003:
Motion Picture Patents Co. v. Universal Film Manufacturing Co.
1736: 1647:"Affordable Care Act survives Supreme Court challenge (again)" 1136: 989: 822: 787: 376:
leadership in both houses of Congress and signed by President
4630:
Graver Tank & Manufacturing Co. v. Linde Air Products Co.
1765:"Affordable Care Act Survives Latest Supreme Court Challenge" 1375:"Democrats Ask Supreme Court for Quick Decision on Obamacare" 328:) to zero, effective for months after December 31, 2018. The 4982:
Association for Molecular Pathology v. Myriad Genetics, Inc.
4950:
Mayo Collaborative Services v. Prometheus Laboratories, Inc.
1534:"Supreme Court appears willing to leave Obamacare in place" 2787:
Houston East & West Texas Railway Co. v. United States
1800:"U.S. Supreme Court rejects latest challenge to Obamacare" 930:"The final GOP tax bill is complete. Here's what is in it" 364:
constitutionality of the individual mandate in this case.
1452:"Supreme Court Will Not Rule Quickly on Obamacare Appeal" 1132:"Federal judge in Texas strikes down Affordable Care Act" 4638:
Aro Manufacturing Co. v. Convertible Top Replacement Co.
4234:
Feist Publications, Inc., v. Rural Telephone Service Co.
5999:
National Federation of Independent Business v. Sebelius
5930:
National Federation of Independent Business v. Sebelius
5675:
Northeast Bancorp v. Federal Reserve Board of Governors
3067:
National Federation of Independent Business v. Sebelius
2416:
Wabash, St. Louis & Pacific Railway Co. v. Illinois
2349:
National Federation of Independent Business v. Sebelius
1618:"Supreme Court dismisses challenge to Obama health law" 404:
National Federation of Independent Business v. Sebelius
308:
case that dealt with the constitutionality of the 2010
6337:
United States Supreme Court cases of the Roberts Court
4101:
Cooper Industries, Inc. v. Leatherman Tool Group, Inc.
3302:
General Talking Pictures Corp. v. Western Electric Co.
1188:"House, Four New States Allowed To Intervene In Texas" 591:
The California-led group filed a petition for writ of
4354:
Fourth Estate Public Benefit Corp. v. Wall-Street.com
4194:
Sony Corp. of America v. Universal City Studios, Inc.
3270:
Hollister v. Benedict & Burnham Manufacturing Co.
2520:
Hunt v. Washington State Apple Advertising Commission
956:
Kaplan, Thomas; Rappeport, Alan (December 19, 2017).
816:
de Vogue, Ariane; Duster, Chandelis (June 18, 2021).
575:
Map of states involved after cases were consolidated
147:
Affirmed in part, vacated in part, and remanded, 945
4934:
Stanford University v. Roche Molecular Systems, Inc.
4520:
Fortnightly Corp. v. United Artists Television, Inc.
4061:
Inwood Laboratories, Inc. v. Ives Laboratories, Inc.
3356:
City of Elizabeth v. American Nicholson Pavement Co.
2995:
Garcia v. San Antonio Metropolitan Transit Authority
2680:
Tennessee Wine and Spirits Retailers Assn. v. Thomas
1271:"Appellate court raises potential new threat to ACA" 986:"20 states challenge constitutionality of Obamacare" 6253: 6226: 6207: 6188: 6161: 6134: 6083: 6045: 6017: 5948: 5897: 5870: 5772: 5418: 5395: 5056: 4846:
Festo Corp. v. Shoketsu Kinzoku Kogyo Kabushiki Co.
4710:
Anderson's-Black Rock, Inc. v. Pavement Salvage Co.
4554: 4388: 4175: 4050: 4021: 3991: 3858: 3773: 3720: 3515: 3390: 3312: 3250: 3205: 3168: 3111: 2698: 2381: 1671: 1669: 1130:de Vogue, Ariane; Luhby, Tami (December 14, 2018). 281: 273: 265: 257: 252: 181: 170: 116: 111: 93: 79: 69: 62: 41: 4566:Continental Paper Bag Co. v. Eastern Paper Bag Co. 4416:Order of St. Benedict of New Jersey v. Steinhauser 2576:South-Central Timber Development, Inc. v. Wunnicke 5226:Immigration and Naturalization Service v. St. Cyr 4870:Illinois Tool Works Inc. v. Independent Ink, Inc. 4806:Warner-Jenkinson Co. v. Hilton Davis Chemical Co. 4606:Sinclair & Carroll Co. v. Interchemical Corp. 4109:TrafFix Devices, Inc. v. Marketing Displays, Inc. 2891:United States v. South-Eastern Underwriters Ass'n 1704:"Court again leaves Affordable Care Act in place" 1562:"Joe Biden vows to bring back Individual Mandate" 958:"Republican Tax Bill Passes Senate in 51-48 Vote" 5242:Department of Homeland Security v. Thuraissigiam 5084:Patent and Trademark Office v. Booking.com B. V. 5038:TC Heartland LLC v. Kraft Foods Group Brands LLC 4117:Dastar Corp. v. Twentieth Century Fox Film Corp. 3662:United Dictionary Co. v. G. & C. Merriam Co. 2664:Comptroller of the Treasury of Maryland v. Wynne 2568:White v. Mass. Council of Construction Employers 2224:Immigration and Naturalization Service v. Chadha 684:wrote the dissenting opinion, joined by Justice 330:District Court of the Northern District of Texas 6332:United States Constitution Article One case law 5539:Energy Reserves Group v. Kansas P. & L. Co. 5006:Akamai Techs., Inc. v. Limelight Networks, Inc. 4782:Bonito Boats, Inc. v. Thunder Craft Boats, Inc. 4338:American Broadcasting Cos., Inc. v. Aereo, Inc. 2811:A.L.A. Schechter Poultry Corp. v. United States 1060:"Federal judge in Texas strikes down ObamaCare" 507:Association of American Physicians and Surgeons 5555:Keystone Bituminous Coal Ass'n v. DeBenedictis 5014:Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc. v. Sandoz, Inc. 4718:Zenith Radio Corp. v. Hazeltine Research, Inc. 4504:Miller Music Corp. v. Charles N. Daniels, Inc. 4424:International News Service v. Associated Press 3949:F. W. Woolworth Co. v. Contemporary Arts, Inc. 3941:Fred Fisher Music Co. v. M. Witmark & Sons 3808:White-Smith Music Publishing Co. v. Apollo Co. 3670:White-Smith Music Publishing Co. v. Apollo Co. 811: 809: 807: 805: 384:to low-income residents through programs like 5739: 5068:G. & C. Merriam Co. v. Syndicate Pub. Co. 4910:Quanta Computer, Inc. v. LG Electronics, Inc. 4432:L. A. Westermann Co. v. Dispatch Printing Co. 4274:Feltner v. Columbia Pictures Television, Inc. 2939:Heart of Atlanta Motel, Inc. v. United States 1899: 1429:Flynn, Meagan; Elfrink, Tim (June 25, 2020). 874:"Trump releases plan for replacing Obamacare" 372:The ACA (Obamacare) was passed in 2010 under 8: 4032:Fashion Originators' Guild of America v. FTC 3877:DeJonge and Co. v. Breuker & Kessler Co. 3747:Fashion Originators' Guild of America v. FTC 5499:Home Building & Loan Ass'n v. Blaisdell 4536:Teleprompter Corp. v. Columbia Broadcasting 4346:Star Athletica, LLC v. Varsity Brands, Inc. 4218:Community for Creative Non-Violence v. Reid 4186:Zacchini v. Scripps-Howard Broadcasting Co. 3981:Williams & Wilkins Co. v. United States 2859:McGoldrick v. Berwind-White Coal Mining Co. 2624:C&A Carbone, Inc. v. Town of Clarkstown 6277: 6071: 5760: 5746: 5732: 5724: 5624: 5582: 5392: 5375: 5257: 5177: 5103: 4854:Merck KGaA v. Integra Lifesciences I, Ltd. 3165: 3151: 3108: 3094: 2803:Board of Trade of City of Chicago v. Olsen 2656:Department of Revenue of Kentucky v. Davis 2378: 2364: 2247: 2199: 2154: 2101: 2032: 1979: 1926: 1906: 1892: 1884: 38: 4614:Funk Bros. Seed Co. v. Kalo Inoculant Co. 4512:Pub. Affairs Associates, Inc. v. Rickover 3792:McLoughlin v. Raphael Tuck & Sons Co. 3755:United States v. Paramount Pictures, Inc. 3739:Interstate Circuit, Inc. v. United States 3731:Straus v. American Publishers Association 3638:McLoughlin v. Raphael Tuck & Sons Co. 6100:Pollock v. Farmers' Loan & Trust Co. 5975:Pollock v. Farmers' Loan & Trust Co. 4926:Global-Tech Appliances, Inc. v. SEB S.A. 4646:Compco Corp. v. Day-Brite Lighting, Inc. 4400:American Lithographic Co. v. Werkmeister 4322:Kirtsaeng v. John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 3630:Bleistein v. Donaldson Lithographing Co. 2843:NLRB v. Jones & Laughlin Steel Corp. 2552:Kassel v. Consolidated Freightways Corp. 2293:Pollock v. Farmers' Loan & Trust Co. 1480:"Supreme Court to Hear Obamacare Appeal" 6235:Brushaber v. Union Pacific Railroad Co. 6116:Brushaber v. Union Pacific Railroad Co. 5531:Allied Structural Steel Co. v. Spannaus 4942:Microsoft Corp. v. i4i Ltd. Partnership 4258:Lotus Dev. Corp. v. Borland Int'l, Inc. 3973:Sears, Roebuck & Co. v. Stiffel Co. 3933:Sheldon v. Metro-Goldwyn Pictures Corp. 3558:Burrow-Giles Lithographic Co. v. Sarony 2688:National Pork Producers Council v. Ross 2608:Chemical Waste Management, Inc. v. Hunt 2432:George W. Bush & Sons Co. v. Malloy 2301:Brushaber v. Union Pacific Railroad Co. 1373:Sanger-Katz, Margot (January 3, 2020). 1086:Armour, Stephanie (December 14, 2018). 764: 603:On June 25, the Trump administration's 6352:United States Commerce Clause case law 4894:KSR International Co. v. Teleflex Inc. 4790:Eli Lilly & Co. v. Medtronic, Inc. 4544:Twentieth Century Music Corp. v. Aiken 4210:Harper & Row v. Nation Enterprises 2851:United States v. Carolene Products Co. 1401:Weixel, Nathaniel (February 3, 2020). 984:McFarland, Susan (February 27, 2018). 605:Solicitor General of the United States 5699:Polar Tankers, Inc. v. City of Valdez 5459:Charles River Bridge v. Warren Bridge 5030:Apple Inc. v. Samsung Electronics Co. 4998:Alice Corp. v. CLS Bank International 4798:Markman v. Westview Instruments, Inc. 4582:United States v. General Electric Co. 4362:Rimini Street Inc. v. Oracle USA Inc. 4330:Petrella v. Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer, Inc. 4165:Romag Fasteners, Inc. v. Fossil, Inc. 4085:Qualitex Co. v. Jacobson Products Co. 2875:United States v. Wrightwood Dairy Co. 2771:Southern Railway Co. v. United States 2400:Willson v. Black-Bird Creek Marsh Co. 1985:Qualifications Clauses of Sections II 1758: 1756: 1754: 1588:Higgens, Tucker (February 10, 2021). 1560:Bursztynsky, Jessica (July 5, 2019). 1532:Higgens, Tucker (November 10, 2020). 1345:Goodnough, Abby (December 18, 2019). 1058:Sullivan, Peter (December 14, 2018). 480:On December 14, 2018, District Judge 36:2021 United States Supreme Court case 7: 5754:United States constitutional tax law 5523:U.S. Trust Co. of N.Y. v. New Jersey 4464:George v. Victor Talking Machine Co. 4378:Georgia v. Public.Resource.Org, Inc. 4077:Two Pesos, Inc. v. Taco Cabana, Inc. 4011:Morton Salt Co. v. G.S. Suppiger Co. 3800:American Tobacco Co. v. Werckmeister 3654:Werckmeister v. American Tobacco Co. 3646:American Tobacco Co. v. Werckmeister 3019:Seminole Tribe of Florida v. Florida 2731:Cooper Manufacturing Co. v. Ferguson 2560:Sporhase v. Nebraska ex rel. Douglas 2512:Complete Auto Transit, Inc. v. Brady 1010:Newkirk II, Vann R. (June 8, 2018). 316:followed after the enactment of the 6357:Taxing and Spending Clause case law 5076:Kellogg Co. v. National Biscuit Co. 5022:Kimble v. Marvel Entertainment, LLC 4298:MGM Studios, Inc. v. Grokster, Ltd. 4125:Moseley v. V Secret Catalogue, Inc. 3832:Caliga v. Inter Ocean Newspaper Co. 3775:International Copyright Act of 1891 2536:Exxon Corp. v. Governor of Maryland 1269:Abutaleb, Yasmeen (June 26, 2019). 928:Long, Heather (December 15, 2017). 511:American Center for Law and Justice 474:United States Department of Justice 6243:Burnet v. Sanford & Brooks Co. 6197:Commissioner v. Glenshaw Glass Co. 4886:MedImmune, Inc. v. Genentech, Inc. 4250:Campbell v. Acuff-Rose Music, Inc. 4141:POM Wonderful LLC v. Coca-Cola Co. 2979:Commonwealth Edison Co. v. Montana 2963:National League of Cities v. Usery 2528:City of Philadelphia v. New Jersey 2480:Bibb v. Navajo Freight Lines, Inc. 2070:U.S. Term Limits, Inc. v. Thornton 2009:U.S. Term Limits, Inc. v. Thornton 1956:Department of Commerce v. New York 1676:Hurley, Lawrence (June 17, 2021). 1186:Keith, Katie (February 15, 2019). 56:Supreme Court of the United States 25: 6362:United States Supreme Court cases 6297:Amendment affecting apportionment 5844:Decline of sovereign tax immunity 4902:Microsoft Corp. v. AT&T Corp. 4862:eBay Inc. v. MercExchange, L.L.C. 4734:United States v. Glaxo Group Ltd. 4574:Minerals Separation, Ltd. v. Hyde 3925:Washingtonian Pub. Co. v. Pearson 3909:Buck v. Jewell-LaSalle Realty Co. 3763:Broadcast Music, Inc. v. CBS Inc. 2867:United States v. Darby Lumber Co. 2755:United States v. E. C. Knight Co. 2632:West Lynn Creamery, Inc. v. Healy 1844:___ (2021) is available from: 1450:Liptak, Adam (January 21, 2020). 1256:10.1377/forefront.20190514.704702 1215:Alltucker, Ken (March 26, 2019). 1202:10.1377/forefront.20190215.143918 783:"Timeline of the health care law" 164:. granted, 140 S. Ct. 1262 (2020) 6292:Apportionment of representatives 5707:Texas v. New Mexico and Colorado 4814:Pfaff v. Wells Electronics, Inc. 4590:United States v. Univis Lens Co. 4440:Lumiere v. Mae Edna Wilder, Inc. 2504:Hughes v. Alexandria Scrap Corp. 2488:National Bellas Hess v. Illinois 2464:Dean Milk Co. v. City of Madison 2424:Swift & Co. v. United States 1297:Goodnough, Abby (July 9, 2019). 1158:Kliff, Sarah (January 3, 2019). 49: 6302:Origination of bills of revenue 5827:Pollock v. Farmers' L. & T. 5320:Garner v. Board of Public Works 4448:Educational Films Corp. v. Ward 4306:Reed Elsevier, Inc. v. Muchnick 3678:Dun v. Lumbermen's Credit Ass'n 2907:H.P. Hood & Sons v. Du Mond 2456:Southern Pacific Co. v. Arizona 1616:Sherman, Mark (June 17, 2021). 6347:2021 in United States case law 5914:Bailey v. Drexel Furniture Co. 3497:Mifflin v. R. H. White Company 2440:Baldwin v. G.A.F. Seelig, Inc. 2309:Bailey v. Drexel Furniture Co. 1763:Liptak, Adam (June 17, 2021). 1478:Liptak, Adam (March 2, 2020). 844:Liptak, Adam (June 29, 2012). 781:Smith, Emily (June 28, 2012). 346:Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals 140:Stay granted, 352 F. Supp. 3d 1: 6262:Bowers v. Kerbaugh-Empire Co. 6151:Bowers v. Kerbaugh-Empire Co. 5507:W.B. Worthen Co. v. Kavanaugh 5435:Dartmouth College v. Woodward 4023:Clayton Antitrust Act of 1914 3816:Globe Newspaper Co. v. Walker 3722:Sherman Antitrust Act of 1890 3294:Bauer & Cie. v. O'Donnell 3195:Globe Newspaper Co. v. Walker 2672:South Dakota v. Wayfair, Inc. 2592:Healy v. Beer Institute, Inc. 2184:United States v. Munoz-Flores 1506:Howe, Amy (August 19, 2020). 872:Demko, Paul (March 2, 2016). 437:Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017 431:Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017 318:Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017 304:, 593 U.S. 659 (2021), was a 6342:Affordable Care Act lawsuits 6124:Stanton v. Baltic Mining Co. 5991:Stanton v. Baltic Mining Co. 5871:Uniformity of indirect taxes 5609:Canton Railroad Co. v. Rogan 4282:New York Times Co. v. Tasini 3286:Schillinger v. United States 2923:Canton Railroad Co. v. Rogan 2472:Miller Bros. Co. v. Maryland 1876:Supreme Court (slip opinion) 646:and joined by Chief Justice 555:health insurance marketplace 6162:Taxable corporate dividends 5109:Necessary and Proper Clause 4878:LabCorp v. Metabolite, Inc. 4202:Mills Music, Inc. v. Snyder 3686:Bobbs-Merrill Co. v. Straus 2827:Panama Refining Co. v. Ryan 2600:Quill Corp. v. North Dakota 2232:Clinton v. City of New York 1702:Howe, Amy (June 17, 2021). 1118:352 F. Supp. 3d 665 1042:340 F. Supp. 3d 579 445:Congressional Budget Office 342:Donald Trump administration 306:United States Supreme Court 6378: 6189:Taxable corporate earnings 6056:Cooley v. Board of Wardens 6033:Cooley v. Board of Wardens 6019:State import-export duties 5887:Brushaber v. Union Pacific 5788:Brushaber v. Union Pacific 5515:City of El Paso v. Simmons 5162:United States v. Kebodeaux 4654:Wilbur-Ellis Co. v. Kuther 2915:Henderson v. United States 2496:Pike v. Bruce Church, Inc. 2408:Cooley v. Board of Wardens 2253:Taxing and Spending Clause 1867:Oyez (oral argument audio) 1730:Judd, DJ (June 17, 2021). 1120: (N.D. Tex. 2018). 564: 409:Taxing and Spending Clause 288:Case or Controversy Clause 122:Summary judgment granted, 26: 6287: 6276: 6227:Deductions and exemptions 6092:Springer v. United States 6070: 5967:Springer v. United States 5922:United States v. Kahriger 5759: 5651:Virginia v. West Virginia 5637: 5623: 5595: 5581: 5391: 5374: 5274: 5263:No Bills of Attainder or 5256: 5196: 5176: 5154:United States v. Comstock 5116: 5102: 4496:Commissioner v. Wodehouse 3901:Fox Film Corp. v. Knowles 3848:Kalem Co. v. Harper Bros. 3164: 3150: 3107: 3093: 3051:United States v. Morrison 3003:New York v. United States 2899:North American Co. v. SEC 2835:Carter v. Carter Coal Co. 2377: 2363: 2285:Springer v. United States 2263: 2246: 2212: 2198: 2170: 2153: 2117: 2100: 2048: 2031: 1995: 1978: 1942: 1925: 545:, was relatively silent. 286: 186: 175: 48: 6178:United States v. Phellis 6108:Flint v. Stone Tracy Co. 5983:Flint v. Stone Tracy Co. 5443:Sturges v. Crowninshield 5336:Barr v. City of Columbia 5288:Sturges v. Crowninshield 5046:Peter v. NantKwest, Inc. 4678:Graham v. John Deere Co. 4472:KVOS v. Associated Press 4242:Fogerty v. Fantasy, Inc. 4040:Dowling v. United States 3824:Bong v. Campbell Art Co. 3784:Press Pub. Co. v. Monroe 3702:Bong v. Campbell Art Co. 2176:Flint v. Stone Tracy Co. 2131:United States v. Johnson 515:Foundation for Moral Law 277:Alito, joined by Gorsuch 63:Argued November 10, 2020 29:California–Texas rivalry 5959:Hylton v. United States 5858:South Carolina v. Baker 5547:Exxon Corp. v. Eagerton 4750:Sakraida v. Ag Pro Inc. 4528:Goldstein v. California 4456:Fox Film Corp. v. Doyal 3869:Hills and Co. v. Hoover 3840:Hills and Co. v. Hoover 3075:Taylor v. United States 2383:Dormant Commerce Clause 2317:United States v. Butler 2269:Hylton v. United States 2139:Gravel v. United States 2107:Speech or Debate Clause 1093:The Wall Street Journal 735:Texas attorney general 5797:Sovereign tax immunity 5683:New Jersey v. New York 5138:Sabri v. United States 4966:Bowman v. Monsanto Co. 4766:Diamond v. Chakrabarty 4686:United States v. Adams 3965:De Sylva v. Ballentine 3885:Herbert v. Shanley Co. 3710:Henry v. A.B. Dick Co. 3550:Schreiber v. Sharpless 3332:Hotchkiss v. Greenwood 3043:Jones v. United States 3035:United States v. Locke 3011:United States v. Lopez 2341:Sabri v. United States 1325:Texas v. United States 1114:Texas v. United States 1038:Texas v. United States 726:Senate Majority Leader 588: 124:Texas v. United States 6307:Federal voting rights 6216:Crane v. Commissioner 5803:McCulloch v. Maryland 5659:Virginia v. Tennessee 5122:McCulloch v. Maryland 4177:Copyright Act of 1976 3917:Douglas v. Cunningham 3860:Copyright Act of 1909 3566:Thornton v. Schreiber 3517:Copyright Act of 1870 3392:Copyright Act of 1831 3170:Copyright Act of 1790 3132:Juilliard v. Greenman 2947:Katzenbach v. McClung 2779:Hoke v. United States 2544:Reeves, Inc. v. Stake 2448:Edwards v. California 1248:www.healthaffairs.org 574: 565:Further information: 534:Jennifer Walker Elrod 360:under the same case. 65:Decided June 17, 2021 6047:State tonnage duties 5850:Flint v. Stone Tracy 5811:Veazie Bank v. Fenno 5691:Virginia v. Maryland 5588:Import-Export Clause 5475:Stone v. Mississippi 5130:Lambert v. Yellowley 4990:FTC v. Actavis, Inc. 4726:Gottschalk v. Benson 4702:Lear, Inc. v. Adkins 4662:Brulotte v. Thys Co. 3622:Bolles v. Outing Co. 3489:Bolles v. Outing Co. 2333:South Dakota v. Dole 2123:Kilbourn v. Thompson 1329:945 F.3d 355 292:U.S. Const. Art. III 6084:History and purpose 6007:California v. Texas 5938:California v. Texas 5898:Regulatory taxation 5408:Hepburn v. Griswold 5352:Kansas v. Hendricks 5328:De Veau v. Braisted 4598:Altvater v. Freeman 3606:Belford v. Scribner 3590:Thompson v. Hubbard 3574:Banks v. Manchester 3425:Stevens v. Gladding 3324:Pennock v. Dialogue 3252:Patent infringement 2931:Boynton v. Virginia 2795:Hammer v. Dagenhart 2001:Powell v. McCormack 1834:California v. Texas 1436:The Washington Post 1276:The Washington Post 935:The Washington Post 907:The Washington Post 617:California v. Texas 530:Carolyn Dineen King 358:Texas v. California 354:California v. Texas 310:Affordable Care Act 301:California v. Texas 44:Texas v. California 42:California v. Texas 18:Texas v. California 6282:Related provisions 6254:Diminution of loss 6170:Eisner v. Macomber 6143:Eisner v. Macomber 5782:Scope of authority 5643:Florida v. Georgia 5398:Legal Tender Cases 5312:Samuels v. McCurdy 5304:Hawker v. New York 5234:Boumediene v. Bush 4822:Dickinson v. Zurko 4290:Eldred v. Ashcroft 3893:Manners v. Morosco 3694:Scribner v. Straus 3598:Higgins v. Keuffel 3582:Callaghan v. Myers 3465:Higgins v. Keuffel 3457:Callaghan v. Myers 3364:Egbert v. Lippmann 3348:Cochrane v. Deener 3207:Patent Act of 1793 3114:Legal Tender Cases 2883:Wickard v. Filburn 2325:Helvering v. Davis 2205:Presentment Clause 2160:Origination Clause 1932:Enumeration Clause 1915:U.S. Supreme Court 1770:The New York Times 1485:The New York Times 1457:The New York Times 1380:The New York Times 1352:The New York Times 1304:The New York Times 963:The New York Times 851:The New York Times 589: 447:to save more than 197:Associate Justices 6319: 6318: 6315: 6314: 6272: 6271: 6066: 6065: 5835:Davis v. Michigan 5721: 5720: 5717: 5716: 5619: 5618: 5601:Brown v. Maryland 5577: 5576: 5573: 5572: 5467:Bronson v. Kinzie 5451:Ogden v. Saunders 5370: 5369: 5252: 5251: 5210:Ex parte Merryman 5186:Suspension Clause 5172: 5171: 5146:Gonzales v. Raich 5098: 5097: 5094: 5093: 4694:Brenner v. Manson 4488:Buck v. Gallagher 4408:Ferris v. Frohman 4157:Iancu v. Brunetti 3526:Perris v. Hexamer 3505:Mifflin v. Dutton 3401:Wheaton v. Peters 3340:O'Reilly v. Morse 3278:Rowell v. Lindsay 3179:Wheaton v. Peters 3146: 3145: 3142: 3141: 3089: 3088: 3085: 3084: 3059:Gonzales v. Raich 2955:Maryland v. Wirtz 2819:Gold Clause Cases 2640:Granholm v. Heald 2392:Brown v. Maryland 2359: 2358: 2242: 2241: 2194: 2193: 2149: 2148: 2096: 2095: 2027: 2026: 1974: 1973: 1964:Trump v. New York 1645:(June 17, 2021). 668:Amy Coney Barrett 609:Noel J. Francisco 586: Respondents 580: Petitioners 297: 296: 245:Amy Coney Barrett 177:unconstitutional. 16:(Redirected from 6369: 6278: 6072: 5906:Head Money Cases 5879:Head Money Cases 5819:Collector v. Day 5774:Authority to tax 5761: 5748: 5741: 5734: 5725: 5625: 5583: 5427:Fletcher v. Peck 5393: 5376: 5296:Ex parte Garland 5258: 5202:Ex parte Bollman 5178: 5104: 4918:Bilski v. Kappos 4774:Diamond v. Diehr 4742:Dann v. Johnston 4226:Stewart v. Abend 3534:Trade-Mark Cases 3417:Stephens v. Cady 3240:Evans v. Hettich 3166: 3157:Copyright Clause 3152: 3109: 3095: 2763:Champion v. Ames 2723:Paul v. Virginia 2707:Gibbons v. Ogden 2379: 2365: 2277:Collector v. Day 2248: 2217:Pocket Veto Case 2200: 2155: 2102: 2054:Ex parte Siebold 2038:Elections Clause 2033: 1980: 1927: 1908: 1901: 1894: 1885: 1880: 1874: 1871: 1865: 1862: 1856: 1853: 1847: 1820: 1819: 1813: 1811: 1796: 1790: 1789: 1787: 1785: 1760: 1749: 1748: 1746: 1744: 1727: 1721: 1720: 1718: 1716: 1699: 1693: 1692: 1690: 1688: 1673: 1664: 1663: 1661: 1659: 1639: 1633: 1632: 1630: 1628: 1622:Associated Press 1613: 1607: 1606: 1604: 1602: 1585: 1579: 1578: 1576: 1574: 1557: 1551: 1550: 1548: 1546: 1529: 1523: 1522: 1520: 1518: 1503: 1497: 1496: 1494: 1492: 1475: 1469: 1468: 1466: 1464: 1447: 1441: 1440: 1426: 1420: 1419: 1417: 1415: 1398: 1392: 1391: 1389: 1387: 1370: 1364: 1363: 1361: 1359: 1342: 1336: 1322: 1316: 1315: 1313: 1311: 1294: 1288: 1287: 1285: 1283: 1266: 1260: 1259: 1240: 1234: 1233: 1231: 1229: 1212: 1206: 1205: 1183: 1177: 1176: 1174: 1172: 1155: 1149: 1148: 1146: 1144: 1127: 1121: 1111: 1105: 1104: 1102: 1100: 1083: 1077: 1076: 1074: 1072: 1055: 1049: 1035: 1029: 1028: 1026: 1024: 1007: 1001: 1000: 998: 996: 981: 975: 974: 972: 970: 953: 947: 946: 944: 942: 925: 919: 918: 916: 914: 897: 891: 890: 888: 886: 869: 863: 862: 860: 858: 841: 835: 834: 832: 830: 813: 800: 799: 797: 795: 778: 772: 769: 585: 579: 450: 442: 416:Republican Party 382:health insurance 182:Court membership 144:(N.D. Tex. 2018) 53: 52: 39: 21: 6377: 6376: 6372: 6371: 6370: 6368: 6367: 6366: 6322: 6321: 6320: 6311: 6283: 6268: 6249: 6222: 6203: 6184: 6157: 6130: 6079: 6062: 6041: 6027:Privilege taxes 6013: 5944: 5893: 5866: 5768: 5755: 5752: 5722: 5713: 5667:Wharton v. Wise 5633: 5615: 5591: 5569: 5414: 5387: 5381:Contract Clause 5366: 5270: 5248: 5192: 5168: 5112: 5111:of Section VIII 5090: 5059:trademark cases 5052: 4958:Kappos v. Hyatt 4758:Parker v. Flook 4550: 4391:copyright cases 4384: 4370:Allen v. Cooper 4314:Golan v. Holder 4171: 4046: 4017: 3987: 3854: 3769: 3716: 3542:Merrell v. Tice 3511: 3473:Holmes v. Hurst 3449:Baker v. Selden 3409:Backus v. Gould 3386: 3308: 3262:Evans v. Jordan 3246: 3201: 3160: 3159:of Section VIII 3138: 3103: 3102:of Section VIII 3081: 2987:EEOC v. Wyoming 2739:Kidd v. Pearson 2715:Passenger Cases 2694: 2584:Maine v. Taylor 2373: 2372:of Section VIII 2370:Commerce Clause 2355: 2259: 2238: 2208: 2190: 2166: 2145: 2113: 2092: 2086:Moore v. Harper 2044: 2023: 2017:Cook v. Gralike 1991: 1970: 1938: 1921: 1912: 1878: 1872: 1869: 1863: 1860: 1854: 1851: 1845: 1829: 1824: 1823: 1809: 1807: 1806:. June 17, 2021 1798: 1797: 1793: 1783: 1781: 1762: 1761: 1752: 1742: 1740: 1729: 1728: 1724: 1714: 1712: 1701: 1700: 1696: 1686: 1684: 1675: 1674: 1667: 1657: 1655: 1641: 1640: 1636: 1626: 1624: 1615: 1614: 1610: 1600: 1598: 1587: 1586: 1582: 1572: 1570: 1559: 1558: 1554: 1544: 1542: 1531: 1530: 1526: 1516: 1514: 1505: 1504: 1500: 1490: 1488: 1477: 1476: 1472: 1462: 1460: 1449: 1448: 1444: 1428: 1427: 1423: 1413: 1411: 1400: 1399: 1395: 1385: 1383: 1372: 1371: 1367: 1357: 1355: 1344: 1343: 1339: 1323: 1319: 1309: 1307: 1296: 1295: 1291: 1281: 1279: 1268: 1267: 1263: 1242: 1241: 1237: 1227: 1225: 1214: 1213: 1209: 1185: 1184: 1180: 1170: 1168: 1157: 1156: 1152: 1142: 1140: 1129: 1128: 1124: 1112: 1108: 1098: 1096: 1085: 1084: 1080: 1070: 1068: 1057: 1056: 1052: 1036: 1032: 1022: 1020: 1009: 1008: 1004: 994: 992: 983: 982: 978: 968: 966: 955: 954: 950: 940: 938: 927: 926: 922: 912: 910: 899: 898: 894: 884: 882: 871: 870: 866: 856: 854: 843: 842: 838: 828: 826: 815: 814: 803: 793: 791: 780: 779: 775: 770: 766: 761: 694: 664:Brett Kavanaugh 656:Sonia Sotomayor 652:Clarence Thomas 640: 628:Brett Kavanaugh 587: 583: 581: 577: 569: 563: 538:Kurt Engelhardt 519:Citizens United 491: 458: 449:US$ 300 billion 448: 440: 433: 428: 370: 335:taxation powers 237:Brett Kavanaugh 235: 223: 221:Sonia Sotomayor 211: 201:Clarence Thomas 86: 64: 58: 43: 37: 32: 23: 22: 15: 12: 11: 5: 6375: 6373: 6365: 6364: 6359: 6354: 6349: 6344: 6339: 6334: 6324: 6323: 6317: 6316: 6313: 6312: 6310: 6309: 6304: 6299: 6294: 6288: 6285: 6284: 6281: 6274: 6273: 6270: 6269: 6267: 6266: 6257: 6255: 6251: 6250: 6248: 6247: 6239: 6230: 6228: 6224: 6223: 6221: 6220: 6211: 6209: 6205: 6204: 6202: 6201: 6192: 6190: 6186: 6185: 6183: 6182: 6174: 6165: 6163: 6159: 6158: 6156: 6155: 6147: 6138: 6136: 6132: 6131: 6129: 6128: 6120: 6112: 6104: 6096: 6087: 6085: 6081: 6080: 6075: 6068: 6067: 6064: 6063: 6061: 6060: 6051: 6049: 6043: 6042: 6040: 6039: 6038: 6037: 6023: 6021: 6015: 6014: 6012: 6011: 6003: 5995: 5987: 5979: 5971: 5963: 5954: 5952: 5946: 5945: 5943: 5942: 5934: 5926: 5918: 5910: 5901: 5899: 5895: 5894: 5892: 5891: 5883: 5874: 5872: 5868: 5867: 5865: 5864: 5863: 5862: 5854: 5841: 5840: 5839: 5831: 5823: 5815: 5807: 5794: 5793: 5792: 5778: 5776: 5770: 5769: 5764: 5757: 5756: 5753: 5751: 5750: 5743: 5736: 5728: 5719: 5718: 5715: 5714: 5712: 5711: 5703: 5695: 5687: 5679: 5671: 5663: 5655: 5647: 5638: 5635: 5634: 5630:Compact Clause 5628: 5621: 5620: 5617: 5616: 5614: 5613: 5605: 5596: 5593: 5592: 5586: 5579: 5578: 5575: 5574: 5571: 5570: 5568: 5567: 5563:Sveen v. Melin 5559: 5551: 5543: 5535: 5527: 5519: 5511: 5503: 5495: 5491:Block v. Hirsh 5487: 5479: 5471: 5463: 5455: 5447: 5439: 5431: 5422: 5420: 5416: 5415: 5413: 5412: 5403: 5401: 5389: 5388: 5379: 5372: 5371: 5368: 5367: 5365: 5364: 5356: 5348: 5344:Teague v. Lane 5340: 5332: 5324: 5316: 5308: 5300: 5292: 5284: 5280:Calder v. Bull 5275: 5272: 5271: 5261: 5254: 5253: 5250: 5249: 5247: 5246: 5238: 5230: 5222: 5214: 5206: 5197: 5194: 5193: 5181: 5174: 5173: 5170: 5169: 5167: 5166: 5158: 5150: 5142: 5134: 5126: 5117: 5114: 5113: 5107: 5100: 5099: 5096: 5095: 5092: 5091: 5089: 5088: 5080: 5072: 5063: 5061: 5054: 5053: 5051: 5050: 5042: 5034: 5026: 5018: 5010: 5002: 4994: 4986: 4978: 4974:Gunn v. Minton 4970: 4962: 4954: 4946: 4938: 4930: 4922: 4914: 4906: 4898: 4890: 4882: 4874: 4866: 4858: 4850: 4842: 4834: 4826: 4818: 4810: 4802: 4794: 4786: 4778: 4770: 4762: 4754: 4746: 4738: 4730: 4722: 4714: 4706: 4698: 4690: 4682: 4674: 4666: 4658: 4650: 4642: 4634: 4626: 4618: 4610: 4602: 4594: 4586: 4578: 4570: 4561: 4559: 4552: 4551: 4549: 4548: 4540: 4532: 4524: 4516: 4508: 4500: 4492: 4484: 4476: 4468: 4460: 4452: 4444: 4436: 4428: 4420: 4412: 4404: 4395: 4393: 4386: 4385: 4383: 4382: 4374: 4366: 4358: 4350: 4342: 4334: 4326: 4318: 4310: 4302: 4294: 4286: 4278: 4270: 4262: 4254: 4246: 4238: 4230: 4222: 4214: 4206: 4198: 4190: 4181: 4179: 4173: 4172: 4170: 4169: 4161: 4153: 4145: 4137: 4129: 4121: 4113: 4105: 4097: 4089: 4081: 4073: 4065: 4056: 4054: 4048: 4047: 4045: 4044: 4036: 4027: 4025: 4019: 4018: 4016: 4015: 4007: 3998: 3996: 3989: 3988: 3986: 3985: 3977: 3969: 3961: 3957:Mazer v. Stein 3953: 3945: 3937: 3929: 3921: 3913: 3905: 3897: 3889: 3881: 3873: 3864: 3862: 3856: 3855: 3853: 3852: 3844: 3836: 3828: 3820: 3812: 3804: 3796: 3788: 3779: 3777: 3771: 3770: 3768: 3767: 3759: 3751: 3743: 3735: 3726: 3724: 3718: 3717: 3715: 3714: 3706: 3698: 3690: 3682: 3674: 3666: 3658: 3650: 3642: 3634: 3626: 3618: 3610: 3602: 3594: 3586: 3578: 3570: 3562: 3554: 3546: 3538: 3530: 3521: 3519: 3513: 3512: 3510: 3509: 3501: 3493: 3485: 3477: 3469: 3461: 3453: 3445: 3441:Paige v. Banks 3437: 3433:Little v. Hall 3429: 3421: 3413: 3405: 3396: 3394: 3388: 3387: 3385: 3384: 3380:Voss v. Fisher 3376: 3368: 3360: 3352: 3344: 3336: 3328: 3319: 3317: 3310: 3309: 3307: 3306: 3298: 3290: 3282: 3274: 3266: 3257: 3255: 3248: 3247: 3245: 3244: 3236: 3232:Evans v. Eaton 3228: 3224:Evans v. Eaton 3220: 3211: 3209: 3203: 3202: 3200: 3199: 3191: 3187:Paige v. Banks 3183: 3174: 3172: 3162: 3161: 3155: 3148: 3147: 3144: 3143: 3140: 3139: 3137: 3136: 3128: 3119: 3117: 3105: 3104: 3100:Coinage Clause 3098: 3091: 3090: 3087: 3086: 3083: 3082: 3080: 3079: 3071: 3063: 3055: 3047: 3039: 3031: 3027:Reno v. Condon 3023: 3015: 3007: 2999: 2991: 2983: 2975: 2967: 2959: 2951: 2943: 2935: 2927: 2919: 2911: 2903: 2895: 2887: 2879: 2871: 2863: 2855: 2847: 2839: 2831: 2823: 2815: 2807: 2799: 2791: 2783: 2775: 2767: 2759: 2751: 2743: 2735: 2727: 2719: 2711: 2702: 2700: 2696: 2695: 2693: 2692: 2684: 2676: 2668: 2660: 2652: 2644: 2636: 2628: 2620: 2612: 2604: 2596: 2588: 2580: 2572: 2564: 2556: 2548: 2540: 2532: 2524: 2516: 2508: 2500: 2492: 2484: 2476: 2468: 2460: 2452: 2444: 2436: 2428: 2420: 2412: 2404: 2396: 2387: 2385: 2375: 2374: 2368: 2361: 2360: 2357: 2356: 2354: 2353: 2345: 2337: 2329: 2321: 2313: 2305: 2297: 2289: 2281: 2273: 2264: 2261: 2260: 2251: 2244: 2243: 2240: 2239: 2237: 2236: 2228: 2220: 2213: 2210: 2209: 2207:of Section VII 2203: 2196: 2195: 2192: 2191: 2189: 2188: 2180: 2171: 2168: 2167: 2158: 2151: 2150: 2147: 2146: 2144: 2143: 2135: 2127: 2118: 2115: 2114: 2105: 2098: 2097: 2094: 2093: 2091: 2090: 2082: 2074: 2066: 2062:Smiley v. Holm 2058: 2049: 2046: 2045: 2036: 2029: 2028: 2025: 2024: 2022: 2021: 2013: 2005: 1996: 1993: 1992: 1983: 1976: 1975: 1972: 1971: 1969: 1968: 1960: 1952: 1943: 1940: 1939: 1930: 1923: 1922: 1913: 1911: 1910: 1903: 1896: 1888: 1882: 1881: 1849:Google Scholar 1828: 1827:External links 1825: 1822: 1821: 1791: 1750: 1722: 1694: 1665: 1634: 1608: 1580: 1552: 1524: 1498: 1470: 1442: 1421: 1393: 1365: 1337: 1317: 1289: 1261: 1235: 1207: 1193:Health Affairs 1178: 1150: 1122: 1106: 1078: 1050: 1030: 1002: 976: 948: 920: 892: 864: 836: 801: 773: 763: 762: 760: 757: 753:Elise Stefanik 745:Kevin McCarthy 714:Xavier Becerra 693: 690: 644:Stephen Breyer 639: 636: 582: 576: 562: 559: 499:2020 elections 490: 487: 457: 456:District Court 454: 432: 429: 427: 424: 369: 366: 322:26 U.S.C. 295: 294: 284: 283: 279: 278: 275: 271: 270: 267: 263: 262: 259: 255: 254: 250: 249: 248: 247: 209:Stephen Breyer 198: 195: 190: 184: 183: 179: 178: 173: 172: 168: 167: 166: 165: 159: 145: 138: 118: 114: 113: 109: 108: 95: 91: 90: 81: 77: 76: 71: 70:Full case name 67: 66: 60: 59: 54: 46: 45: 35: 24: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 6374: 6363: 6360: 6358: 6355: 6353: 6350: 6348: 6345: 6343: 6340: 6338: 6335: 6333: 6330: 6329: 6327: 6308: 6305: 6303: 6300: 6298: 6295: 6293: 6290: 6289: 6286: 6279: 6275: 6264: 6263: 6259: 6258: 6256: 6252: 6245: 6244: 6240: 6237: 6236: 6232: 6231: 6229: 6225: 6218: 6217: 6213: 6212: 6210: 6208:Taxable gains 6206: 6199: 6198: 6194: 6193: 6191: 6187: 6180: 6179: 6175: 6172: 6171: 6167: 6166: 6164: 6160: 6153: 6152: 6148: 6145: 6144: 6140: 6139: 6137: 6133: 6126: 6125: 6121: 6118: 6117: 6113: 6110: 6109: 6105: 6102: 6101: 6097: 6094: 6093: 6089: 6088: 6086: 6082: 6078: 6077:Amendment XVI 6073: 6069: 6058: 6057: 6053: 6052: 6050: 6048: 6044: 6035: 6034: 6030: 6029: 6028: 6025: 6024: 6022: 6020: 6016: 6009: 6008: 6004: 6001: 6000: 5996: 5993: 5992: 5988: 5985: 5984: 5980: 5977: 5976: 5972: 5969: 5968: 5964: 5961: 5960: 5956: 5955: 5953: 5951: 5947: 5940: 5939: 5935: 5932: 5931: 5927: 5924: 5923: 5919: 5916: 5915: 5911: 5908: 5907: 5903: 5902: 5900: 5896: 5889: 5888: 5884: 5881: 5880: 5876: 5875: 5873: 5869: 5860: 5859: 5855: 5852: 5851: 5847: 5846: 5845: 5842: 5837: 5836: 5832: 5829: 5828: 5824: 5821: 5820: 5816: 5813: 5812: 5808: 5805: 5804: 5800: 5799: 5798: 5795: 5790: 5789: 5785: 5784: 5783: 5780: 5779: 5777: 5775: 5771: 5767: 5762: 5758: 5749: 5744: 5742: 5737: 5735: 5730: 5729: 5726: 5709: 5708: 5704: 5701: 5700: 5696: 5693: 5692: 5688: 5685: 5684: 5680: 5677: 5676: 5672: 5669: 5668: 5664: 5661: 5660: 5656: 5653: 5652: 5648: 5645: 5644: 5640: 5639: 5636: 5631: 5626: 5622: 5611: 5610: 5606: 5603: 5602: 5598: 5597: 5594: 5589: 5584: 5580: 5565: 5564: 5560: 5557: 5556: 5552: 5549: 5548: 5544: 5541: 5540: 5536: 5533: 5532: 5528: 5525: 5524: 5520: 5517: 5516: 5512: 5509: 5508: 5504: 5501: 5500: 5496: 5493: 5492: 5488: 5485: 5484: 5483:Smyth v. Ames 5480: 5477: 5476: 5472: 5469: 5468: 5464: 5461: 5460: 5456: 5453: 5452: 5448: 5445: 5444: 5440: 5437: 5436: 5432: 5429: 5428: 5424: 5423: 5421: 5417: 5410: 5409: 5405: 5404: 5402: 5400: 5399: 5394: 5390: 5386: 5382: 5377: 5373: 5362: 5361: 5357: 5354: 5353: 5349: 5346: 5345: 5341: 5338: 5337: 5333: 5330: 5329: 5325: 5322: 5321: 5317: 5314: 5313: 5309: 5306: 5305: 5301: 5298: 5297: 5293: 5290: 5289: 5285: 5282: 5281: 5277: 5276: 5273: 5269:of Section IX 5268: 5266: 5265:Ex post facto 5259: 5255: 5244: 5243: 5239: 5236: 5235: 5231: 5228: 5227: 5223: 5220: 5219: 5218:Ex parte Endo 5215: 5212: 5211: 5207: 5204: 5203: 5199: 5198: 5195: 5191: 5187: 5185: 5184:Habeas corpus 5179: 5175: 5164: 5163: 5159: 5156: 5155: 5151: 5148: 5147: 5143: 5140: 5139: 5135: 5132: 5131: 5127: 5124: 5123: 5119: 5118: 5115: 5110: 5105: 5101: 5086: 5085: 5081: 5078: 5077: 5073: 5070: 5069: 5065: 5064: 5062: 5060: 5055: 5048: 5047: 5043: 5040: 5039: 5035: 5032: 5031: 5027: 5024: 5023: 5019: 5016: 5015: 5011: 5008: 5007: 5003: 5000: 4999: 4995: 4992: 4991: 4987: 4984: 4983: 4979: 4976: 4975: 4971: 4968: 4967: 4963: 4960: 4959: 4955: 4952: 4951: 4947: 4944: 4943: 4939: 4936: 4935: 4931: 4928: 4927: 4923: 4920: 4919: 4915: 4912: 4911: 4907: 4904: 4903: 4899: 4896: 4895: 4891: 4888: 4887: 4883: 4880: 4879: 4875: 4872: 4871: 4867: 4864: 4863: 4859: 4856: 4855: 4851: 4848: 4847: 4843: 4840: 4839: 4835: 4832: 4831: 4827: 4824: 4823: 4819: 4816: 4815: 4811: 4808: 4807: 4803: 4800: 4799: 4795: 4792: 4791: 4787: 4784: 4783: 4779: 4776: 4775: 4771: 4768: 4767: 4763: 4760: 4759: 4755: 4752: 4751: 4747: 4744: 4743: 4739: 4736: 4735: 4731: 4728: 4727: 4723: 4720: 4719: 4715: 4712: 4711: 4707: 4704: 4703: 4699: 4696: 4695: 4691: 4688: 4687: 4683: 4680: 4679: 4675: 4672: 4671: 4667: 4664: 4663: 4659: 4656: 4655: 4651: 4648: 4647: 4643: 4640: 4639: 4635: 4632: 4631: 4627: 4624: 4623: 4619: 4616: 4615: 4611: 4608: 4607: 4603: 4600: 4599: 4595: 4592: 4591: 4587: 4584: 4583: 4579: 4576: 4575: 4571: 4568: 4567: 4563: 4562: 4560: 4558: 4553: 4546: 4545: 4541: 4538: 4537: 4533: 4530: 4529: 4525: 4522: 4521: 4517: 4514: 4513: 4509: 4506: 4505: 4501: 4498: 4497: 4493: 4490: 4489: 4485: 4482: 4481: 4480:Gibbs v. Buck 4477: 4474: 4473: 4469: 4466: 4465: 4461: 4458: 4457: 4453: 4450: 4449: 4445: 4442: 4441: 4437: 4434: 4433: 4429: 4426: 4425: 4421: 4418: 4417: 4413: 4410: 4409: 4405: 4402: 4401: 4397: 4396: 4394: 4392: 4387: 4380: 4379: 4375: 4372: 4371: 4367: 4364: 4363: 4359: 4356: 4355: 4351: 4348: 4347: 4343: 4340: 4339: 4335: 4332: 4331: 4327: 4324: 4323: 4319: 4316: 4315: 4311: 4308: 4307: 4303: 4300: 4299: 4295: 4292: 4291: 4287: 4284: 4283: 4279: 4276: 4275: 4271: 4268: 4267: 4263: 4260: 4259: 4255: 4252: 4251: 4247: 4244: 4243: 4239: 4236: 4235: 4231: 4228: 4227: 4223: 4220: 4219: 4215: 4212: 4211: 4207: 4204: 4203: 4199: 4196: 4195: 4191: 4188: 4187: 4183: 4182: 4180: 4178: 4174: 4167: 4166: 4162: 4159: 4158: 4154: 4151: 4150: 4146: 4143: 4142: 4138: 4135: 4134: 4130: 4127: 4126: 4122: 4119: 4118: 4114: 4111: 4110: 4106: 4103: 4102: 4098: 4095: 4094: 4090: 4087: 4086: 4082: 4079: 4078: 4074: 4071: 4070: 4066: 4063: 4062: 4058: 4057: 4055: 4053: 4049: 4042: 4041: 4037: 4034: 4033: 4029: 4028: 4026: 4024: 4020: 4013: 4012: 4008: 4005: 4004: 4000: 3999: 3997: 3994: 3993:Patent misuse 3990: 3983: 3982: 3978: 3975: 3974: 3970: 3967: 3966: 3962: 3959: 3958: 3954: 3951: 3950: 3946: 3943: 3942: 3938: 3935: 3934: 3930: 3927: 3926: 3922: 3919: 3918: 3914: 3911: 3910: 3906: 3903: 3902: 3898: 3895: 3894: 3890: 3887: 3886: 3882: 3879: 3878: 3874: 3871: 3870: 3866: 3865: 3863: 3861: 3857: 3850: 3849: 3845: 3842: 3841: 3837: 3834: 3833: 3829: 3826: 3825: 3821: 3818: 3817: 3813: 3810: 3809: 3805: 3802: 3801: 3797: 3794: 3793: 3789: 3786: 3785: 3781: 3780: 3778: 3776: 3772: 3765: 3764: 3760: 3757: 3756: 3752: 3749: 3748: 3744: 3741: 3740: 3736: 3733: 3732: 3728: 3727: 3725: 3723: 3719: 3712: 3711: 3707: 3704: 3703: 3699: 3696: 3695: 3691: 3688: 3687: 3683: 3680: 3679: 3675: 3672: 3671: 3667: 3664: 3663: 3659: 3656: 3655: 3651: 3648: 3647: 3643: 3640: 3639: 3635: 3632: 3631: 3627: 3624: 3623: 3619: 3616: 3615: 3614:Brady v. Daly 3611: 3608: 3607: 3603: 3600: 3599: 3595: 3592: 3591: 3587: 3584: 3583: 3579: 3576: 3575: 3571: 3568: 3567: 3563: 3560: 3559: 3555: 3552: 3551: 3547: 3544: 3543: 3539: 3536: 3535: 3531: 3528: 3527: 3523: 3522: 3520: 3518: 3514: 3507: 3506: 3502: 3499: 3498: 3494: 3491: 3490: 3486: 3483: 3482: 3481:Brady v. Daly 3478: 3475: 3474: 3470: 3467: 3466: 3462: 3459: 3458: 3454: 3451: 3450: 3446: 3443: 3442: 3438: 3435: 3434: 3430: 3427: 3426: 3422: 3419: 3418: 3414: 3411: 3410: 3406: 3403: 3402: 3398: 3397: 3395: 3393: 3389: 3382: 3381: 3377: 3374: 3373: 3369: 3366: 3365: 3361: 3358: 3357: 3353: 3350: 3349: 3345: 3342: 3341: 3337: 3334: 3333: 3329: 3326: 3325: 3321: 3320: 3318: 3315: 3314:Patentability 3311: 3304: 3303: 3299: 3296: 3295: 3291: 3288: 3287: 3283: 3280: 3279: 3275: 3272: 3271: 3267: 3264: 3263: 3259: 3258: 3256: 3253: 3249: 3242: 3241: 3237: 3234: 3233: 3229: 3226: 3225: 3221: 3218: 3217: 3216:Tyler v. Tuel 3213: 3212: 3210: 3208: 3204: 3197: 3196: 3192: 3189: 3188: 3184: 3181: 3180: 3176: 3175: 3173: 3171: 3167: 3163: 3158: 3153: 3149: 3134: 3133: 3129: 3126: 3125: 3121: 3120: 3118: 3116: 3115: 3110: 3106: 3101: 3096: 3092: 3077: 3076: 3072: 3069: 3068: 3064: 3061: 3060: 3056: 3053: 3052: 3048: 3045: 3044: 3040: 3037: 3036: 3032: 3029: 3028: 3024: 3021: 3020: 3016: 3013: 3012: 3008: 3005: 3004: 3000: 2997: 2996: 2992: 2989: 2988: 2984: 2981: 2980: 2976: 2973: 2972: 2968: 2965: 2964: 2960: 2957: 2956: 2952: 2949: 2948: 2944: 2941: 2940: 2936: 2933: 2932: 2928: 2925: 2924: 2920: 2917: 2916: 2912: 2909: 2908: 2904: 2901: 2900: 2896: 2893: 2892: 2888: 2885: 2884: 2880: 2877: 2876: 2872: 2869: 2868: 2864: 2861: 2860: 2856: 2853: 2852: 2848: 2845: 2844: 2840: 2837: 2836: 2832: 2829: 2828: 2824: 2821: 2820: 2816: 2813: 2812: 2808: 2805: 2804: 2800: 2797: 2796: 2792: 2789: 2788: 2784: 2781: 2780: 2776: 2773: 2772: 2768: 2765: 2764: 2760: 2757: 2756: 2752: 2749: 2748: 2744: 2741: 2740: 2736: 2733: 2732: 2728: 2725: 2724: 2720: 2717: 2716: 2712: 2709: 2708: 2704: 2703: 2701: 2697: 2690: 2689: 2685: 2682: 2681: 2677: 2674: 2673: 2669: 2666: 2665: 2661: 2658: 2657: 2653: 2650: 2649: 2645: 2642: 2641: 2637: 2634: 2633: 2629: 2626: 2625: 2621: 2618: 2617: 2613: 2610: 2609: 2605: 2602: 2601: 2597: 2594: 2593: 2589: 2586: 2585: 2581: 2578: 2577: 2573: 2570: 2569: 2565: 2562: 2561: 2557: 2554: 2553: 2549: 2546: 2545: 2541: 2538: 2537: 2533: 2530: 2529: 2525: 2522: 2521: 2517: 2514: 2513: 2509: 2506: 2505: 2501: 2498: 2497: 2493: 2490: 2489: 2485: 2482: 2481: 2477: 2474: 2473: 2469: 2466: 2465: 2461: 2458: 2457: 2453: 2450: 2449: 2445: 2442: 2441: 2437: 2434: 2433: 2429: 2426: 2425: 2421: 2418: 2417: 2413: 2410: 2409: 2405: 2402: 2401: 2397: 2394: 2393: 2389: 2388: 2386: 2384: 2380: 2376: 2371: 2366: 2362: 2351: 2350: 2346: 2343: 2342: 2338: 2335: 2334: 2330: 2327: 2326: 2322: 2319: 2318: 2314: 2311: 2310: 2306: 2303: 2302: 2298: 2295: 2294: 2290: 2287: 2286: 2282: 2279: 2278: 2274: 2271: 2270: 2266: 2265: 2262: 2258: 2254: 2249: 2245: 2234: 2233: 2229: 2226: 2225: 2221: 2218: 2215: 2214: 2211: 2206: 2201: 2197: 2186: 2185: 2181: 2178: 2177: 2173: 2172: 2169: 2165: 2161: 2156: 2152: 2141: 2140: 2136: 2133: 2132: 2128: 2125: 2124: 2120: 2119: 2116: 2112: 2108: 2103: 2099: 2088: 2087: 2083: 2080: 2079: 2075: 2072: 2071: 2067: 2064: 2063: 2059: 2056: 2055: 2051: 2050: 2047: 2043: 2039: 2034: 2030: 2019: 2018: 2014: 2011: 2010: 2006: 2003: 2002: 1998: 1997: 1994: 1990: 1986: 1981: 1977: 1966: 1965: 1961: 1958: 1957: 1953: 1950: 1949: 1948:Utah v. Evans 1945: 1944: 1941: 1937: 1933: 1928: 1924: 1919: 1916: 1909: 1904: 1902: 1897: 1895: 1890: 1889: 1886: 1877: 1868: 1859: 1850: 1843: 1839: 1835: 1831: 1830: 1826: 1817: 1805: 1801: 1795: 1792: 1780: 1776: 1772: 1771: 1766: 1759: 1757: 1755: 1751: 1739: 1738: 1733: 1726: 1723: 1711: 1710: 1705: 1698: 1695: 1683: 1679: 1672: 1670: 1666: 1654: 1653: 1648: 1644: 1638: 1635: 1623: 1619: 1612: 1609: 1597: 1596: 1591: 1584: 1581: 1569: 1568: 1563: 1556: 1553: 1541: 1540: 1535: 1528: 1525: 1513: 1509: 1502: 1499: 1487: 1486: 1481: 1474: 1471: 1459: 1458: 1453: 1446: 1443: 1438: 1437: 1432: 1425: 1422: 1410: 1409: 1404: 1397: 1394: 1382: 1381: 1376: 1369: 1366: 1354: 1353: 1348: 1341: 1338: 1334: 1330: 1326: 1321: 1318: 1306: 1305: 1300: 1293: 1290: 1278: 1277: 1272: 1265: 1262: 1257: 1253: 1249: 1245: 1239: 1236: 1224: 1223: 1218: 1211: 1208: 1203: 1199: 1195: 1194: 1189: 1182: 1179: 1167: 1166: 1161: 1154: 1151: 1139: 1138: 1133: 1126: 1123: 1119: 1115: 1110: 1107: 1095: 1094: 1089: 1082: 1079: 1067: 1066: 1061: 1054: 1051: 1047: 1043: 1039: 1034: 1031: 1019: 1018: 1013: 1006: 1003: 991: 987: 980: 977: 965: 964: 959: 952: 949: 937: 936: 931: 924: 921: 909: 908: 903: 896: 893: 881: 880: 875: 868: 865: 853: 852: 847: 840: 837: 825: 824: 819: 812: 810: 808: 806: 802: 790: 789: 784: 777: 774: 768: 765: 758: 756: 754: 750: 749:Steve Scalise 746: 742: 741:John Barrasso 738: 733: 730: 729:Chuck Schumer 727: 723: 720: 719:House Speaker 715: 712: 711:HHS Secretary 707: 702: 699: 698:Steve Vladeck 691: 689: 687: 683: 678: 676: 671: 669: 665: 661: 657: 653: 650:and Justices 649: 645: 637: 635: 631: 629: 625: 620: 618: 612: 610: 606: 601: 599: 594: 573: 568: 561:Supreme Court 560: 558: 556: 552: 546: 544: 539: 535: 531: 527: 522: 520: 516: 512: 508: 504: 500: 496: 495:Fifth Circuit 489:Fifth Circuit 488: 486: 483: 482:Reed O'Connor 478: 475: 471: 467: 466:Texas v. Azar 463: 455: 453: 446: 438: 430: 425: 423: 421: 417: 414:In 2016, the 412: 410: 406: 405: 400: 395: 391: 387: 383: 379: 375: 367: 365: 361: 359: 355: 351: 347: 343: 338: 336: 331: 327: 323: 319: 315: 311: 307: 303: 302: 293: 289: 285: 280: 276: 272: 268: 264: 260: 256: 253:Case opinions 251: 246: 242: 238: 234: 230: 226: 222: 218: 214: 210: 206: 202: 199: 196: 194: 191: 189:Chief Justice 188: 187: 185: 180: 174: 169: 163: 160: 157: 153: 150: 146: 143: 139: 136: 132: 129: 125: 121: 120: 119: 115: 110: 106: 105: 100: 96: 92: 89: 85: 82: 78: 75: 72: 68: 61: 57: 47: 40: 34: 30: 19: 6260: 6241: 6233: 6214: 6195: 6176: 6168: 6149: 6141: 6122: 6114: 6106: 6098: 6090: 6054: 6031: 6026: 6006: 6005: 5997: 5989: 5981: 5973: 5965: 5957: 5950:Direct taxes 5937: 5936: 5928: 5920: 5912: 5904: 5885: 5877: 5856: 5848: 5843: 5833: 5825: 5817: 5809: 5801: 5796: 5786: 5781: 5705: 5697: 5689: 5681: 5673: 5665: 5657: 5649: 5641: 5632:of Section X 5607: 5599: 5590:of Section X 5561: 5553: 5545: 5537: 5529: 5521: 5513: 5505: 5497: 5489: 5481: 5473: 5465: 5457: 5449: 5441: 5433: 5425: 5406: 5396: 5360:Smith v. Doe 5358: 5350: 5342: 5334: 5326: 5318: 5310: 5302: 5294: 5286: 5278: 5264: 5240: 5232: 5224: 5216: 5208: 5200: 5183: 5160: 5152: 5144: 5136: 5128: 5120: 5082: 5074: 5066: 5044: 5036: 5028: 5020: 5012: 5004: 4996: 4988: 4980: 4972: 4964: 4956: 4948: 4940: 4932: 4924: 4916: 4908: 4900: 4892: 4884: 4876: 4868: 4860: 4852: 4844: 4836: 4828: 4820: 4812: 4804: 4796: 4788: 4780: 4772: 4764: 4756: 4748: 4740: 4732: 4724: 4716: 4708: 4700: 4692: 4684: 4676: 4668: 4660: 4652: 4644: 4636: 4628: 4620: 4612: 4604: 4596: 4588: 4580: 4572: 4564: 4557:patent cases 4542: 4534: 4526: 4518: 4510: 4502: 4494: 4486: 4478: 4470: 4462: 4454: 4446: 4438: 4430: 4422: 4414: 4406: 4398: 4376: 4368: 4360: 4352: 4344: 4336: 4328: 4320: 4312: 4304: 4296: 4288: 4280: 4272: 4264: 4256: 4248: 4240: 4232: 4224: 4216: 4208: 4200: 4192: 4184: 4163: 4155: 4149:Matal v. Tam 4147: 4139: 4131: 4123: 4115: 4107: 4099: 4091: 4083: 4075: 4067: 4059: 4038: 4030: 4009: 4001: 3979: 3971: 3963: 3955: 3947: 3939: 3931: 3923: 3915: 3907: 3899: 3891: 3883: 3875: 3867: 3846: 3838: 3830: 3822: 3814: 3806: 3798: 3790: 3782: 3761: 3753: 3745: 3737: 3729: 3708: 3700: 3692: 3684: 3676: 3668: 3660: 3652: 3644: 3636: 3628: 3620: 3612: 3604: 3596: 3588: 3580: 3572: 3564: 3556: 3548: 3540: 3532: 3524: 3503: 3495: 3487: 3479: 3471: 3463: 3455: 3447: 3439: 3431: 3423: 3415: 3407: 3399: 3378: 3370: 3362: 3354: 3346: 3338: 3330: 3322: 3300: 3292: 3284: 3276: 3268: 3260: 3238: 3230: 3222: 3214: 3193: 3185: 3177: 3130: 3122: 3112: 3073: 3065: 3057: 3049: 3041: 3033: 3025: 3017: 3009: 3001: 2993: 2985: 2977: 2969: 2961: 2953: 2945: 2937: 2929: 2921: 2913: 2905: 2897: 2889: 2881: 2873: 2865: 2857: 2849: 2841: 2833: 2825: 2817: 2809: 2801: 2793: 2785: 2777: 2769: 2761: 2753: 2745: 2737: 2729: 2721: 2713: 2705: 2686: 2678: 2670: 2662: 2654: 2646: 2638: 2630: 2622: 2614: 2606: 2598: 2590: 2582: 2574: 2566: 2558: 2550: 2542: 2534: 2526: 2518: 2510: 2502: 2494: 2486: 2478: 2470: 2462: 2454: 2446: 2438: 2430: 2422: 2414: 2406: 2398: 2390: 2347: 2339: 2331: 2323: 2315: 2307: 2299: 2291: 2283: 2275: 2267: 2257:Section VIII 2230: 2222: 2182: 2174: 2137: 2129: 2121: 2084: 2076: 2068: 2060: 2052: 2015: 2007: 1999: 1962: 1954: 1946: 1833: 1814:– via 1808:. Retrieved 1794: 1782:. Retrieved 1768: 1741:. Retrieved 1735: 1725: 1713:. Retrieved 1707: 1697: 1685:. Retrieved 1656:. Retrieved 1650: 1643:Benen, Steve 1637: 1625:. Retrieved 1611: 1601:February 10, 1599:. Retrieved 1593: 1583: 1571:. Retrieved 1565: 1555: 1545:November 10, 1543:. Retrieved 1537: 1527: 1515:. Retrieved 1511: 1501: 1489:. Retrieved 1483: 1473: 1461:. Retrieved 1455: 1445: 1434: 1424: 1412:. Retrieved 1406: 1396: 1384:. Retrieved 1378: 1368: 1356:. Retrieved 1350: 1340: 1324: 1320: 1308:. Retrieved 1302: 1292: 1280:. Retrieved 1274: 1264: 1247: 1238: 1226:. Retrieved 1220: 1210: 1191: 1181: 1169:. Retrieved 1163: 1153: 1141:. Retrieved 1135: 1125: 1113: 1109: 1097:. Retrieved 1091: 1081: 1071:December 15, 1069:. Retrieved 1063: 1053: 1037: 1033: 1021:. Retrieved 1017:The Atlantic 1015: 1005: 993:. Retrieved 979: 967:. Retrieved 961: 951: 939:. Retrieved 933: 923: 911:. Retrieved 905: 895: 883:. Retrieved 877: 867: 855:. Retrieved 849: 839: 827:. Retrieved 821: 792:. Retrieved 786: 776: 767: 734: 722:Nancy Pelosi 703: 695: 686:Neil Gorsuch 682:Samuel Alito 679: 674: 672: 648:John Roberts 641: 632: 626:and Justice 624:John Roberts 621: 616: 613: 602: 592: 590: 551:severability 547: 543:Jimmy Carter 523: 502: 492: 479: 469: 465: 459: 434: 426:Case history 420:Donald Trump 413: 402: 378:Barack Obama 371: 362: 357: 353: 339: 326:§ 5000A 313: 300: 299: 298: 282:Laws applied 240: 233:Neil Gorsuch 228: 216: 213:Samuel Alito 204: 193:John Roberts 123: 112:Case history 102: 73: 33: 5267:Laws Clause 3124:Knox v. Lee 2164:Section VII 1573:February 1, 1335: 2019). 1048: 2018). 1044:, 593 ( 660:Elena Kagan 399:Republicans 266:Concurrence 225:Elena Kagan 128:F. Supp. 3d 80:Docket nos. 6326:Categories 5190:Section IX 4052:Lanham Act 2747:In re Debs 2111:Section VI 2042:Section IV 1936:Section II 1709:SCOTUSblog 1517:August 20, 1512:SCOTUSblog 759:References 737:Ken Paxton 704:President 675:California 593:certiorari 394:income tax 374:Democratic 368:Background 340:Under the 314:California 5766:Article I 5385:Section X 1918:Article I 1779:0362-4331 1222:USA Today 1046:N.D. Tex. 706:Joe Biden 692:Reactions 350:severable 135:N.D. Tex. 94:Citations 3995:case law 3316:case law 3254:case law 1920:case law 1832:Text of 1810:June 19, 1784:June 19, 1743:June 18, 1715:June 18, 1687:June 17, 1658:June 17, 1627:June 17, 1491:March 2, 1463:March 2, 1414:March 2, 1408:The Hill 1386:March 2, 1358:March 2, 1333:5th Cir. 1310:March 2, 1282:March 2, 1250:. 2019. 1228:March 2, 1171:March 2, 1143:March 2, 1099:March 2, 1065:The Hill 1023:March 2, 995:March 2, 969:March 2, 941:March 2, 913:March 2, 885:March 7, 879:Politico 857:March 7, 829:June 19, 794:March 7, 680:Justice 638:Decision 526:standing 470:Sebelius 390:Medicaid 386:Medicare 258:Majority 156:5th Cir. 1804:Reuters 1682:Reuters 274:Dissent 171:Holding 88:19-1019 6265:(1926) 6246:(1931) 6238:(1915) 6219:(1947) 6200:(1955) 6181:(1921) 6173:(1920) 6154:(1926) 6146:(1920) 6135:Income 6127:(1916) 6119:(1915) 6111:(1911) 6103:(1895) 6095:(1881) 6059:(1851) 6036:(1851) 6010:(2020) 6002:(2012) 5994:(1916) 5986:(1911) 5978:(1895) 5970:(1881) 5962:(1796) 5941:(2020) 5933:(2012) 5925:(1953) 5917:(1922) 5909:(1884) 5890:(1915) 5882:(1884) 5861:(1988) 5853:(1911) 5838:(1989) 5830:(1895) 5822:(1871) 5814:(1869) 5806:(1819) 5791:(1915) 5710:(2018) 5702:(2009) 5694:(2003) 5686:(1998) 5678:(1985) 5670:(1894) 5662:(1893) 5654:(1871) 5646:(1855) 5612:(1951) 5604:(1827) 5566:(2018) 5558:(1987) 5550:(1983) 5542:(1983) 5534:(1978) 5526:(1977) 5518:(1965) 5510:(1935) 5502:(1934) 5494:(1921) 5486:(1898) 5478:(1880) 5470:(1843) 5462:(1837) 5454:(1827) 5446:(1819) 5438:(1819) 5430:(1810) 5419:Others 5411:(1870) 5363:(2003) 5355:(1997) 5347:(1989) 5339:(1964) 5331:(1960) 5323:(1951) 5315:(1925) 5307:(1898) 5299:(1866) 5291:(1819) 5283:(1798) 5245:(2020) 5237:(2008) 5229:(2001) 5221:(1944) 5213:(1861) 5205:(1807) 5165:(2013) 5157:(2010) 5149:(2005) 5141:(2004) 5133:(1926) 5125:(1819) 5087:(2020) 5079:(1938) 5071:(1915) 5057:Other 5049:(2019) 5041:(2017) 5033:(2016) 5025:(2015) 5017:(2015) 5009:(2014) 5001:(2014) 4993:(2013) 4985:(2013) 4977:(2013) 4969:(2013) 4961:(2012) 4953:(2012) 4945:(2011) 4937:(2011) 4929:(2011) 4921:(2010) 4913:(2008) 4905:(2007) 4897:(2007) 4889:(2007) 4881:(2006) 4873:(2006) 4865:(2006) 4857:(2005) 4849:(2002) 4841:(2001) 4833:(1999) 4825:(1999) 4817:(1998) 4809:(1997) 4801:(1996) 4793:(1990) 4785:(1989) 4777:(1981) 4769:(1980) 4761:(1978) 4753:(1976) 4745:(1976) 4737:(1973) 4729:(1972) 4721:(1971) 4713:(1969) 4705:(1969) 4697:(1966) 4689:(1966) 4681:(1966) 4673:(1965) 4665:(1964) 4657:(1964) 4649:(1964) 4641:(1961) 4633:(1950) 4625:(1950) 4617:(1948) 4609:(1945) 4601:(1943) 4593:(1942) 4585:(1926) 4577:(1916) 4569:(1908) 4555:Other 4547:(1975) 4539:(1974) 4531:(1973) 4523:(1968) 4515:(1962) 4507:(1960) 4499:(1949) 4491:(1939) 4483:(1939) 4475:(1936) 4467:(1934) 4459:(1932) 4451:(1931) 4443:(1923) 4435:(1919) 4427:(1918) 4419:(1914) 4411:(1912) 4403:(1911) 4389:Other 4381:(2020) 4373:(2020) 4365:(2019) 4357:(2019) 4349:(2017) 4341:(2014) 4333:(2014) 4325:(2013) 4317:(2012) 4309:(2010) 4301:(2005) 4293:(2003) 4285:(2001) 4277:(1998) 4269:(1998) 4261:(1996) 4253:(1994) 4245:(1994) 4237:(1991) 4229:(1990) 4221:(1989) 4213:(1985) 4205:(1985) 4197:(1984) 4189:(1977) 4168:(2020) 4160:(2019) 4152:(2017) 4144:(2014) 4136:(2014) 4128:(2003) 4120:(2003) 4112:(2001) 4104:(2001) 4096:(1999) 4088:(1995) 4080:(1992) 4072:(1987) 4064:(1982) 4043:(1985) 4035:(1941) 4014:(1942) 4006:(1917) 3984:(1973) 3976:(1964) 3968:(1956) 3960:(1954) 3952:(1952) 3944:(1943) 3936:(1940) 3928:(1939) 3920:(1935) 3912:(1931) 3904:(1923) 3896:(1920) 3888:(1917) 3880:(1914) 3872:(1911) 3851:(1911) 3843:(1911) 3835:(1909) 3827:(1909) 3819:(1908) 3811:(1908) 3803:(1907) 3795:(1903) 3787:(1896) 3766:(1979) 3758:(1948) 3750:(1941) 3742:(1939) 3734:(1913) 3713:(1912) 3705:(1909) 3697:(1908) 3689:(1908) 3681:(1908) 3673:(1908) 3665:(1907) 3657:(1907) 3649:(1907) 3641:(1903) 3633:(1903) 3625:(1899) 3617:(1899) 3609:(1892) 3601:(1891) 3593:(1889) 3585:(1888) 3577:(1888) 3569:(1888) 3561:(1884) 3553:(1884) 3545:(1881) 3537:(1879) 3529:(1879) 3508:(1903) 3500:(1903) 3492:(1899) 3484:(1899) 3476:(1899) 3468:(1891) 3460:(1888) 3452:(1879) 3444:(1872) 3436:(1856) 3428:(1854) 3420:(1853) 3412:(1849) 3404:(1834) 3383:(1885) 3375:(1885) 3367:(1881) 3359:(1878) 3351:(1876) 3343:(1853) 3335:(1851) 3327:(1829) 3305:(1938) 3297:(1913) 3289:(1894) 3281:(1885) 3273:(1885) 3265:(1815) 3243:(1822) 3235:(1822) 3227:(1818) 3219:(1810) 3198:(1908) 3190:(1872) 3182:(1834) 3135:(1884) 3127:(1871) 3078:(2016) 3070:(2012) 3062:(2005) 3054:(2000) 3046:(2000) 3038:(2000) 3030:(2000) 3022:(1996) 3014:(1995) 3006:(1992) 2998:(1985) 2990:(1983) 2982:(1981) 2974:(1981) 2966:(1976) 2958:(1968) 2950:(1964) 2942:(1964) 2934:(1960) 2926:(1951) 2918:(1950) 2910:(1949) 2902:(1946) 2894:(1944) 2886:(1942) 2878:(1942) 2870:(1941) 2862:(1940) 2854:(1938) 2846:(1937) 2838:(1936) 2830:(1935) 2822:(1935) 2814:(1935) 2806:(1923) 2798:(1918) 2790:(1914) 2782:(1913) 2774:(1911) 2766:(1903) 2758:(1895) 2750:(1895) 2742:(1888) 2734:(1885) 2726:(1869) 2718:(1849) 2710:(1824) 2699:Others 2691:(2023) 2683:(2019) 2675:(2018) 2667:(2015) 2659:(2008) 2651:(2007) 2643:(2005) 2635:(1994) 2627:(1994) 2619:(1994) 2611:(1992) 2603:(1992) 2595:(1989) 2587:(1986) 2579:(1984) 2571:(1983) 2563:(1982) 2555:(1981) 2547:(1980) 2539:(1978) 2531:(1978) 2523:(1977) 2515:(1977) 2507:(1976) 2499:(1970) 2491:(1967) 2483:(1959) 2475:(1954) 2467:(1951) 2459:(1945) 2451:(1941) 2443:(1935) 2435:(1925) 2427:(1905) 2419:(1886) 2411:(1852) 2403:(1829) 2395:(1827) 2352:(2012) 2344:(2004) 2336:(1987) 2328:(1937) 2320:(1936) 2312:(1922) 2304:(1916) 2296:(1895) 2288:(1881) 2280:(1871) 2272:(1796) 2235:(1998) 2227:(1983) 2219:(1929) 2187:(1990) 2179:(1911) 2142:(1972) 2134:(1966) 2126:(1881) 2089:(2023) 2081:(2015) 2073:(1995) 2065:(1932) 2057:(1879) 2020:(2001) 2012:(1995) 2004:(1969) 1967:(2020) 1959:(2019) 1951:(2002) 1879:  1873:  1870:  1864:  1861:  1858:Justia 1855:  1852:  1846:  1816:CBC.ca 1777:  1331: ( 666:, and 584:  578:  536:, and 517:, and 503:et al. 324:  269:Thomas 243: 241:· 239:  231: 229:· 227:  219: 217:· 215:  207: 205:· 203:  126:, 340 84:19-840 1840: 1652:MSNBC 441:US$ 0 158:2019) 137:2018) 117:Prior 101:659 ( 1987:and 1842:U.S. 1812:2021 1786:2021 1775:ISSN 1745:2021 1717:2021 1689:2021 1660:2021 1629:2021 1603:2021 1595:CNBC 1575:2021 1567:CNBC 1547:2020 1539:CNBC 1519:2020 1493:2020 1465:2020 1416:2020 1388:2020 1360:2020 1312:2020 1284:2020 1230:2020 1173:2020 1145:2020 1101:2020 1073:2018 1025:2020 997:2020 971:2020 943:2020 915:2020 887:2020 859:2020 831:2021 796:2020 751:and 724:and 598:ripe 388:and 356:and 162:Cert 149:F.3d 104:more 99:U.S. 97:593 5383:of 5188:of 2255:of 2162:of 2109:of 2040:of 1989:III 1934:of 1838:593 1737:CNN 1252:doi 1198:doi 1165:Vox 1137:CNN 990:UPI 823:CNN 788:CNN 152:355 142:665 131:579 6328:: 1836:, 1802:. 1773:. 1767:. 1753:^ 1734:. 1706:. 1680:. 1668:^ 1649:. 1620:. 1592:. 1564:. 1536:. 1510:. 1482:. 1454:. 1433:. 1405:. 1377:. 1349:. 1327:, 1301:. 1273:. 1246:. 1219:. 1196:. 1190:. 1162:. 1134:. 1116:, 1090:. 1062:. 1040:, 1014:. 988:. 960:. 932:. 904:. 876:. 848:. 820:. 804:^ 785:. 747:, 662:, 658:, 654:, 619:. 607:, 532:, 521:. 513:, 509:, 411:. 337:. 290:, 5747:e 5740:t 5733:v 1907:e 1900:t 1893:v 1818:. 1788:. 1747:. 1719:. 1691:. 1662:. 1631:. 1605:. 1577:. 1549:. 1521:. 1495:. 1467:. 1439:. 1418:. 1390:. 1362:. 1314:. 1286:. 1258:. 1254:: 1232:. 1204:. 1200:: 1175:. 1147:. 1103:. 1075:. 1027:. 999:. 973:. 945:. 917:. 889:. 861:. 833:. 798:. 154:( 133:( 107:) 31:. 20:)

Index

Texas v. California
California–Texas rivalry
Supreme Court of the United States
19-840
19-1019
U.S.
more
F. Supp. 3d
579
N.D. Tex.
665
F.3d
355
5th Cir.
Cert
John Roberts
Clarence Thomas
Stephen Breyer
Samuel Alito
Sonia Sotomayor
Elena Kagan
Neil Gorsuch
Brett Kavanaugh
Amy Coney Barrett
Case or Controversy Clause
U.S. Const. Art. III
United States Supreme Court
Affordable Care Act
Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017
26 U.S.C.

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

↑