Knowledge

The Feast of the Poets

Source 📝

181:, that sought to overcome the standards of neoclassical poetry with emphasis on the problems inherent in the French standards created by those like Nicholas Despreaux-Boileau. As such, Hunt praises Wordsworth as the leader of a new type of poetry. Although Byron is not fully discussed in early editions of the poem, he is discussed in the notes as an individual who would become an important person who had already "taken his place, beyond a doubt, in the list of English Poets". By the 1815 edition, Byron was introduced and was praised by Apollo, which reflected a friendship between the two. 43: 165:
excitements:- up, my friend; come out with me among the beauties of nature and the simplicities of life, and feel the breath of heaven about you". – No advice can be better: we feel the call instinctively; we get up, accompany the poet into his walks, and acknowledge them to be the best and the most beautiful; but what do we meet there? Idiot boys, Mad Mothers, Wandering Jews...
143:. The work was intended to update the 17th-century tradition of "Sessions of the Poets", a satirical portrayal of both good and bad contemporary poets. In 1813, James Cawthorn, a publisher, asked Hunt to complete a full-length edition of the poem that would include both an introduction and notes to the work. Hunt began to work on the poem and the work was soon expanded. 155:
The poem satirically describes many of Hunt's contemporaries: Wordsworth is experiencing a "second childhood", Coleridge "muddles" in writing, and William Gifford is a "sour little gentleman". Four great poets, Thomas Moore, Walter Scott, Robert Southey, and Thomas Campbell are allowed to dine with
164:
he says to us, "Your complexion is diseased your blood fevered you endeavour to keep up your pleasurable sensations by stimulants too violent to last, which must be succeeded by others of still greater violence:- this will not do: your mind wants air and exercise, – fresh thoughts and natural
188:. Hazlitt emphasised the egotistical aspects of Wordsworth's regular contemplation in his works. Hazlitt also relied on Hunt's criticism of Wordsworth preferring common people as his heroes. Hazlitt's review, grounded in Hunt's ideas, influenced John Keats's view of the "wordsworthian or 146:
In January 1814, the work was published and well received by Hunt's friends. The new edition was dedicated to Thomas Mitchell and ended with a sonnet dedicated to Thomas Barnes, both friends of Hunt. The poem would be revised throughout Hunt's life, including an edition in 1815.
204:
Hunt received favourable responses from many of his friends and from Byron and Byron's friend Thomas Moore. However, the magazines were divided on the basis of their political views as they matched with Hunt's own. Many claimed that Hunt's poem was seditious, including the
159:
In the rewrite, Hunt says that was not included because "I haven't the brains". His view of Wordsworth changed to praising Wordsworth as a great poet but also one that "substitute one set of diseased perceptions for another:
184:
The work influenced how critics viewed Romantic poetry. Hunt's interpretation of Wordsworth and Wordsworth's poetry was later picked up and developed by William Hazlitt in a review of Wordsworth's
177:
The purpose of the notes was to describe, in Hunt's view, what would happen to the reputation of various poets. He placed a particular emphasis on the British Romantic poetry, including
604: 169:
Regardless of the problems, Hunt admits to a connection with Wordsworth, especially in their use of poetry to deal with complex psychological issues.
435: 239: 494: 487: 549: 115:). The work describes Hunt's contemporary poets, and either praises or mocks them by allowing only the best to dine with 589: 480: 196:
relied on Hunt's claim that Wordsworth focused on the morbid aspects of life or dwelled too much on abstract concepts.
189: 459: 428: 233: 535: 466: 100: 517: 127:. Critics praised or attacked the work on the basis of their sympathies towards Hunt's political views. 567: 213: 599: 594: 510: 421: 107:. It was published in an expanded form in 1814, and revised and expanded throughout his life (see 120: 42: 503: 542: 124: 207: 112: 108: 583: 243:
believed that Hunt should have stressed society when discussing Wordsworth's poetry.
139:, which carried poetry and other literature. One of the works that he submitted was 219: 444: 33: 116: 417: 413: 156:
Apollo while Samuel Rogers is only allowed to have tea.
396:. Madison: Fairleigh Dickinson University Press, 1994. 559: 527: 451: 84: 76: 68: 60: 52: 23: 389:. London: Harper & Brothers Publishers, 1930. 605:Works originally published in British magazines 227:, with a review by John Scott, along with the 429: 103:that was originally published in 1811 in the 8: 403:. New York: Little, Brown and Company, 2005. 436: 422: 414: 135:In 1811, Hunt began a magazine called the 41: 20: 251: 119:. The work also provided commentary on 192:". In Biographia Literaria, Coleridge 382:. New York: St. Martin's Press, 1985. 7: 394:Leigh Hunt and the Poetry of Fancy 14: 1: 621: 387:Leigh Hunt and His Circle 312:Roe 2009 qtd. pp. 202–203 258:Roe 2005 pp. 125–126, 201 40: 30: 410:. London: Pimlico, 2005. 223:. On the contrary, the 16:1811 poem by Leigh Hunt 536:The Calendar of Nature 495:The Palace of Pleasure 474:The Feast of the Poets 467:The Descent of Liberty 401:The Wit in the Dungeon 276:Holden 2005 pp. 53, 79 167: 141:The Feast of the Poets 96:The Feast of the Poets 25:The Feast of the Poets 518:Abou Ben Adhem (poem) 162: 568:Literary Pocket-Book 366:Roe 2009 pp. 203–204 357:Roe 2009 pp. 212–213 330:Roe 2005 pp. 201–202 237:, praised the work. 214:New Monthly Magazine 194:Biographia Literaria 590:Works by Leigh Hunt 511:The Story of Rimini 460:Bacchus and Ariadne 392:Edgecombe, Rodney. 339:Roe 2005 qtd p. 202 240:The Critical Review 190:egotistical sublime 121:William Wordsworth 53:First published in 577: 576: 399:Holden, Anthony. 385:Blunden, Edmund. 348:Holden 2005 p. 79 294:Holden 2005 p. 85 200:Critical response 92: 91: 612: 543:Edinburgh Review 481:Hero and Leander 438: 431: 424: 415: 367: 364: 358: 355: 349: 346: 340: 337: 331: 328: 322: 319: 313: 310: 304: 301: 295: 292: 286: 283: 277: 274: 268: 265: 259: 256: 85:Publication date 45: 36: 26: 21: 620: 619: 615: 614: 613: 611: 610: 609: 580: 579: 578: 573: 555: 523: 447: 442: 406:Roe, Nicholas. 375: 370: 365: 361: 356: 352: 347: 343: 338: 334: 329: 325: 321:Roe 2009 p. 203 320: 316: 311: 307: 303:Roe 2005 p. 126 302: 298: 293: 289: 285:Roe 2005 p. 126 284: 280: 275: 271: 267:Roe 2005 p. 203 266: 262: 257: 253: 249: 202: 179:Lyrical Ballads 175: 153: 133: 125:Romantic poetry 48: 47:1814 title page 31: 24: 17: 12: 11: 5: 618: 616: 608: 607: 602: 597: 592: 582: 581: 575: 574: 572: 571: 563: 561: 557: 556: 554: 553: 546: 539: 531: 529: 525: 524: 522: 521: 514: 507: 500: 499: 498: 484: 477: 470: 463: 455: 453: 449: 448: 443: 441: 440: 433: 426: 418: 412: 411: 404: 397: 390: 383: 378:Blainey, Ann. 374: 371: 369: 368: 359: 350: 341: 332: 323: 314: 305: 296: 287: 278: 269: 260: 250: 248: 245: 234:Monthly Review 208:British Critic 201: 198: 174: 171: 152: 149: 132: 129: 113:1814 in poetry 109:1811 in poetry 90: 89: 86: 82: 81: 80:James Cawthorn 78: 74: 73: 70: 66: 65: 62: 58: 57: 54: 50: 49: 46: 38: 37: 28: 27: 15: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 617: 606: 603: 601: 598: 596: 593: 591: 588: 587: 585: 570: 569: 565: 564: 562: 558: 552: 551: 547: 545: 544: 540: 538: 537: 533: 532: 530: 526: 520: 519: 515: 513: 512: 508: 506: 505: 501: 497: 496: 492: 491: 490: 489: 485: 483: 482: 478: 476: 475: 471: 469: 468: 464: 462: 461: 457: 456: 454: 450: 446: 439: 434: 432: 427: 425: 420: 419: 416: 409: 405: 402: 398: 395: 391: 388: 384: 381: 377: 376: 372: 363: 360: 354: 351: 345: 342: 336: 333: 327: 324: 318: 315: 309: 306: 300: 297: 291: 288: 282: 279: 273: 270: 264: 261: 255: 252: 246: 244: 242: 241: 236: 235: 230: 226: 222: 221: 216: 215: 210: 209: 199: 197: 195: 191: 187: 182: 180: 172: 170: 166: 161: 157: 150: 148: 144: 142: 138: 130: 128: 126: 122: 118: 114: 110: 106: 102: 99:is a poem by 98: 97: 87: 83: 79: 75: 71: 67: 63: 59: 56:The Reflector 55: 51: 44: 39: 35: 29: 22: 19: 566: 548: 541: 534: 516: 509: 502: 493: 486: 479: 473: 472: 465: 458: 407: 400: 393: 386: 380:Immortal Boy 379: 362: 353: 344: 335: 326: 317: 308: 299: 290: 281: 272: 263: 254: 238: 232: 228: 224: 220:The Satirist 218: 212: 206: 203: 193: 185: 183: 178: 176: 168: 163: 158: 154: 145: 140: 136: 134: 104: 95: 94: 93: 18: 408:Fiery Heart 600:1814 poems 595:1811 poems 584:Categories 528:Journalism 504:The Nymphs 445:Leigh Hunt 373:References 131:Background 101:Leigh Hunt 34:Leigh Hunt 488:Juvenilia 186:Excursion 137:Reflector 105:Reflector 77:Publisher 550:Examiner 231:and the 229:Eclectic 225:Champion 69:Language 72:English 64:England 61:Country 452:Poetry 217:, and 173:Themes 117:Apollo 560:Misc. 247:Notes 151:Poem 123:and 88:1811 32:by 586:: 211:, 111:, 437:e 430:t 423:v

Index

Leigh Hunt

Leigh Hunt
1811 in poetry
1814 in poetry
Apollo
William Wordsworth
Romantic poetry
egotistical sublime
British Critic
New Monthly Magazine
The Satirist
Monthly Review
The Critical Review
v
t
e
Leigh Hunt
Bacchus and Ariadne
The Descent of Liberty
The Feast of the Poets
Hero and Leander
Juvenilia
The Palace of Pleasure
The Nymphs
The Story of Rimini
Abou Ben Adhem (poem)
The Calendar of Nature
Edinburgh Review
Examiner

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.