Knowledge

The Mayor's Office for Policing and Crime v Mitsui Sumitomo Insurance Co (Europe) Ltd

Source 📝

31: 289:
must be considered in the context of previous legislative history. Compensation following a riot was first provided for by Parliament in the Riot Act 1714 and although the scope of compensation was not defined; subsequent case law made it clear that "statutory compensation was confined to physical
262:
It does not matter whether consequential losses such as loss of profits were recoverable from a trespasser in tort in 1886. In principle, section 2(1) covers all heads of loss compensable under English law for damage to property caused by trespassers in the course of a riot and the heads of
511: 706: 559: 842: 837: 832: 827: 822: 817: 812: 807: 802: 797: 792: 787: 782: 777: 772: 767: 749: 358: 179: 334:
in the case stated that "With many claims for consequential loss dependent on the outcome of this case, today's Supreme Court decision will likely save the UK taxpayer upwards of £80m."
675: 549: 984: 528: 504: 683: 689: 606: 497: 616: 847: 581: 242:
The High Court held that section 2 only provided for compensation for the physical damage suffered and not any consequential loss of profits or rent.
1014: 994: 868: 591: 331: 291: 222: 250:
The Court of Appeal reversed the decision of the High Court and held that section 2 provided a right to compensation for all heads of loss. The
722: 695: 1009: 1019: 734: 545: 210:. After stealing goods from the warehouse they proceeded to start a fire that destroyed the warehouse and the goods that remained inside. 716: 611: 576: 520: 183: 41: 863: 348: 885: 1024: 214: 945: 225:
argued that compensation should only extend to the physical damage whereas the insurers argued that it should also include
30: 989: 873: 649: 601: 596: 1004: 999: 890: 878: 728: 263:
compensation recoverable are to be determined with reference to the English law of damages as it develops over time.
895: 621: 311: 936: 907: 555: 207: 586: 318:. Furthermore, section 8(2) of the 2016 Act now makes it clear that compensation will not generally extend to 924: 353: 315: 307: 286: 218: 187: 157: 127: 399: 255: 319: 226: 161: 131: 479: 388: 950: 310:
was archaic and therefore created uncertainty as regards interpretation. As such section 10 of the
251: 900: 484: 343: 303: 199: 414: 110:
Mitsui Sumitomo Insurance Co (Europe) Ltd & Anor v The Mayor's Office for Policing and Crime
52:
The Mayor's Office for Policing and Crime v Mitsui Sumitomo Insurance Co (Europe) Ltd & Ors
655: 429: 433: 418: 403: 290:
damage to property." On this basis the Supreme Court unanimously allowed the appeal by the
113: 941: 376: 108: (20 May 2014), dismissing an appeal and allowing the claimants' cross-appeals from 105: 24:
The Mayor's Office for Policing and Crime v Mitsui Sumitomo Insurance Co (Europe) Ltd
445: 269: 489: 1029: 978: 171:
The Mayor's Office for Policing and Crime v Mitsui Sumitomo Insurance Co (Europe) Ltd
175: 102:
Mitsui Sumitomo Insurance Co (Europe) Ltd v Mayor's Office for Policing and Crime
912: 643: 282: 929: 917: 203: 956: 450: 147:
Lord Neuberger, Lord Clarke, Lord Hughes, Lord Toulson and Lord Hodge
221:
but a dispute arose surrounding the quantification of loss. The
493: 455: 202:. On 8 August 2011 a gang broke into a warehouse owned by 750:
List of judges of the Supreme Court of the United Kingdom
359:
2016 Judgments of the Supreme Court of the United Kingdom
198:
The case concerns an incident that took place during the
446:"Mayor Boris Johnson wins London riot compensation case" 186:
that provided an interpretation of section 2 to the
856: 760: 744: 705: 674: 665: 634: 569: 538: 527: 151: 143: 138: 120: 96: 91: 81: 73: 65: 57: 47: 37: 23: 260: 505: 8: 130:does not extend to include compensation for 671: 535: 512: 498: 490: 29: 20: 985:Supreme Court of the United Kingdom cases 369: 967:Justices shown in order of appointment 217:, made a claim under section 2 of the 7: 684:The Lord Phillips of Worth Matravers 306:it was felt that the wording of the 521:Supreme Court of the United Kingdom 184:Supreme Court of the United Kingdom 114:[2013] EWHC 2734 (Comm) 42:Supreme Court of the United Kingdom 349:Timeline of the 2011 England riots 330:The law firm that represented the 14: 886:Judiciaries of the United Kingdom 869:House of Lords judicial functions 690:The Lord Neuberger of Abbotsbury 607:Lord Stephens of Creevyloughgare 1015:2011 in United Kingdom case law 995:2016 in United Kingdom case law 215:Mitsui Sumitomo Insurance Group 946:Secretary of State for Justice 1: 723:The Baroness Hale of Richmond 696:The Baroness Hale of Richmond 1010:21st-century riots in London 874:List of House of Lords cases 1020:Arson in the United Kingdom 891:Courts of England and Wales 617:Lord Richards of Camberwell 106:[2014] EWCA Civ 682 1046: 896:Courts of Northern Ireland 717:The Lord Hope of Craighead 546:The Lord Reed of Allermuir 434:Riot Compensation Act 2016 419:Riot Compensation Act 2016 404:Riot Compensation Act 2016 312:Riot Compensation Act 2016 1025:MS&AD Insurance Group 965: 937:Law officers of the Crown 908:Law of the United Kingdom 582:Lord Briggs of Westbourne 156: 125: 28: 116: (12 September 2013) 925:Law of Northern Ireland 354:Riot (Damages) Act 1886 316:Riot (Damages) Act 1886 308:Riot (Damages) Act 1886 287:Riot (Damages) Act 1886 219:Riot (Damages) Act 1886 188:Riot (Damages) Act 1886 158:Riot (Damages) Act 1886 128:Riot (Damages) Act 1886 612:Lady Rose of Colmworth 592:Lord Hamblen of Kersey 480:Supreme Court judgment 274: 176:[2016] UKSC 18 485:Video of the judgment 320:consequential damages 281:In the lead judgment 227:consequential damages 162:Consequential damages 132:consequential damages 285:emphasised that the 990:2016 in British law 951:Middlesex Guildhall 302:In the wake of the 252:Master of the Rolls 1005:Looting in England 1000:2011 England riots 901:Courts of Scotland 344:2011 England riots 200:2011 England riots 61:27–29 October 2015 972: 971: 756: 755: 630: 629: 400:Explanatory Notes 167: 166: 126:Section 2 of the 1037: 672: 577:Lord Lloyd-Jones 560:Deputy President 536: 514: 507: 500: 491: 468: 467: 465: 463: 442: 436: 427: 421: 412: 406: 397: 391: 385: 379: 377:EWHC 2734 (Comm) 374: 272: 74:Neutral citation 33: 21: 1045: 1044: 1040: 1039: 1038: 1036: 1035: 1034: 975: 974: 973: 968: 961: 942:Lord Chancellor 852: 752: 740: 708: 701: 667: 661: 636: 626: 565: 530: 523: 518: 476: 471: 461: 459: 458:. 20 April 2016 444: 443: 439: 428: 424: 413: 409: 398: 394: 386: 382: 375: 371: 367: 340: 328: 300: 279: 273: 268:Paragraph 123, 267: 248: 246:Court of Appeal 240: 235: 196: 160: 86: 17: 12: 11: 5: 1043: 1041: 1033: 1032: 1027: 1022: 1017: 1012: 1007: 1002: 997: 992: 987: 977: 976: 970: 969: 966: 963: 962: 960: 959: 954: 948: 939: 934: 933: 932: 927: 922: 921: 920: 905: 904: 903: 898: 893: 883: 882: 881: 876: 866: 860: 858: 854: 853: 851: 850: 845: 840: 835: 830: 825: 820: 815: 810: 805: 800: 795: 790: 785: 780: 775: 770: 764: 762: 758: 757: 754: 753: 748: 746: 742: 741: 739: 738: 732: 729:The Lord Mance 726: 720: 713: 711: 703: 702: 700: 699: 693: 687: 680: 678: 669: 663: 662: 660: 659: 653: 647: 640: 638: 632: 631: 628: 627: 625: 624: 619: 614: 609: 604: 599: 594: 589: 584: 579: 573: 571: 567: 566: 564: 563: 553: 542: 540: 533: 525: 524: 519: 517: 516: 509: 502: 494: 488: 487: 482: 475: 474:External links 472: 470: 469: 437: 422: 407: 392: 387:Paragraph 30, 380: 368: 366: 363: 362: 361: 356: 351: 346: 339: 336: 327: 324: 299: 296: 278: 275: 265: 247: 244: 239: 236: 234: 231: 213:The insurers, 195: 192: 165: 164: 154: 153: 149: 148: 145: 141: 140: 136: 135: 123: 122: 118: 117: 98: 94: 93: 89: 88: 83: 79: 78: 75: 71: 70: 67: 63: 62: 59: 55: 54: 49: 48:Full case name 45: 44: 39: 35: 34: 26: 25: 15: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 1042: 1031: 1028: 1026: 1023: 1021: 1018: 1016: 1013: 1011: 1008: 1006: 1003: 1001: 998: 996: 993: 991: 988: 986: 983: 982: 980: 964: 958: 955: 952: 949: 947: 943: 940: 938: 935: 931: 928: 926: 923: 919: 916: 915: 914: 911: 910: 909: 906: 902: 899: 897: 894: 892: 889: 888: 887: 884: 880: 877: 875: 872: 871: 870: 867: 865: 862: 861: 859: 855: 849: 846: 844: 841: 839: 836: 834: 831: 829: 826: 824: 821: 819: 816: 814: 811: 809: 806: 804: 801: 799: 796: 794: 791: 789: 786: 784: 781: 779: 776: 774: 771: 769: 766: 765: 763: 759: 751: 747: 743: 736: 733: 730: 727: 724: 721: 718: 715: 714: 712: 710: 704: 697: 694: 691: 688: 685: 682: 681: 679: 677: 673: 670: 664: 657: 654: 651: 648: 645: 642: 641: 639: 633: 623: 620: 618: 615: 613: 610: 608: 605: 603: 600: 598: 595: 593: 590: 588: 585: 583: 580: 578: 575: 574: 572: 568: 561: 557: 554: 551: 547: 544: 543: 541: 537: 534: 532: 526: 522: 515: 510: 508: 503: 501: 496: 495: 492: 486: 483: 481: 478: 477: 473: 457: 453: 452: 447: 441: 438: 435: 431: 426: 423: 420: 416: 411: 408: 405: 401: 396: 393: 390: 384: 381: 378: 373: 370: 364: 360: 357: 355: 352: 350: 347: 345: 342: 341: 337: 335: 333: 325: 323: 321: 317: 314:repealed the 313: 309: 305: 297: 295: 293: 288: 284: 277:Supreme Court 276: 271: 264: 259: 257: 253: 245: 243: 237: 232: 230: 228: 224: 220: 216: 211: 209: 205: 201: 193: 191: 189: 185: 181: 180:2016 judgment 177: 173: 172: 163: 159: 155: 150: 146: 142: 139:Case opinions 137: 133: 129: 124: 119: 115: 111: 107: 103: 99: 97:Prior history 95: 90: 84: 80: 76: 72: 69:20 April 2016 68: 64: 60: 56: 53: 50: 46: 43: 40: 36: 32: 27: 22: 19: 16:UK legal case 864:Constitution 658:(since 2020) 650:Mark Ormerod 602:Lord Burrows 597:Lord Leggatt 460:. Retrieved 449: 440: 425: 410: 395: 383: 372: 329: 301: 280: 270:EWCA Civ 682 261: 249: 241: 212: 197: 170: 169: 168: 109: 101: 100:APPEAL from 92:Case history 51: 18: 913:English law 737:(2018–2020) 731:(2017–2018) 725:(2013–2017) 719:(2009–2013) 698:(2017–2020) 692:(2012–2017) 686:(2009–2012) 652:(2015–2020) 646:(2009–2015) 622:Lady Simler 152:Area of law 82:Reported at 979:Categories 953:(location) 644:Jenny Rowe 587:Lord Sales 556:Lord Hodge 539:Leadership 415:Section 10 365:References 304:2011 riots 283:Lord Hodge 256:Lord Dyson 238:High Court 87:2 WLR 1148 85:WLR(D) 208 930:Scots law 918:Welsh law 879:Law Lords 761:Judgments 735:Lord Reed 709:President 676:President 656:Vicky Fox 637:Executive 550:President 430:Section 8 298:Aftermath 204:Sony DADC 957:UKSCblog 668:justices 531:justices 462:22 April 451:BBC News 338:See also 326:Reaction 266:—  258:stated: 233:Judgment 144:Majority 857:Related 529:Current 402:to the 389:UKSC 18 208:Enfield 182:of the 121:Holding 77:UKSC 18 66:Decided 745:Judges 707:Deputy 666:Former 570:Judges 58:Argued 635:Chief 194:Facts 178:is a 174: 112: 104: 38:Court 1030:Sony 944:and 848:List 843:2024 838:2023 833:2022 828:2021 823:2020 818:2019 813:2018 808:2017 803:2016 798:2015 793:2014 788:2013 783:2012 778:2011 773:2010 768:2009 464:2016 332:MOPC 292:MOPC 223:MOPC 456:BBC 206:in 981:: 454:. 448:. 432:, 417:, 322:. 294:. 254:, 229:. 190:. 562:) 558:( 552:) 548:( 513:e 506:t 499:v 466:. 134:.

Index


Supreme Court of the United Kingdom
[2014] EWCA Civ 682
[2013] EWHC 2734 (Comm)
Riot (Damages) Act 1886
consequential damages
Riot (Damages) Act 1886
Consequential damages
[2016] UKSC 18
2016 judgment
Supreme Court of the United Kingdom
Riot (Damages) Act 1886
2011 England riots
Sony DADC
Enfield
Mitsui Sumitomo Insurance Group
Riot (Damages) Act 1886
MOPC
consequential damages
Master of the Rolls
Lord Dyson
EWCA Civ 682
Lord Hodge
Riot (Damages) Act 1886
MOPC
2011 riots
Riot (Damages) Act 1886
Riot Compensation Act 2016
Riot (Damages) Act 1886
consequential damages

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.