253:
28:
269:
The former would extend information and consultation rights backwards into commercial decision-making, while the latter might be seen as pointlessly late – how can you consult meaningfully about reducing the number of redundancies where the decision which makes them inevitable has already been
236:
by going further than EU law required. These appeals were dismissed on the basis that just because legislation does not contain a clear exemption does not mean that the courts should read any such exemption into the legislation. On the second ground it was held that because the
264:
The case will now return to the Court of Appeal where it will be decided whether the duty to consult arises when there is a proposal to make a business decision that will lead to redundancies or when that decision has been made. On this point it has been argued that:
103:
applies to employment in a public administrative establishment. The secretary of state did not exceed his powers when making the
Collective Redundancies and Transfer of Undertakings (Protection of Employment) (Amendment) Regulations 1995 by going further than
191:. In 2006 the base was closed down and Mrs Nolan was dismissed for redundancy on the day before it closed. Mrs Nolan brought a case based on the failure of the United States to consult with an employee representative when proposing to dismiss her.
373:
568:
421:
704:
699:
694:
689:
684:
679:
674:
669:
664:
659:
654:
649:
644:
639:
634:
629:
611:
290:
238:
229:
168:
160:
100:
537:
411:
866:
220:
whether the duty to consult with an employee representative arose on a 'proposal' or a 'decision' to close the base. The
European Court declined jurisdiction over the issue.
846:
390:
366:
545:
316:
551:
468:
359:
478:
244:
Lord
Carnwath dissented on this point and noted the importance of limiting the ministerial power to legislate outside of the normal parliamentary process.
876:
709:
232:
should not apply to public administrative establishments and secondly that the
Secretary of State had exceeded the powers conferred by section 2 of the
204:
Both the
Employment Tribunal and Employment Appeal Tribunal found in favour of Mrs Nolan and granted an order for remuneration for a one-month period.
443:
851:
730:
453:
584:
557:
217:
596:
407:
578:
473:
438:
382:
164:
38:
861:
856:
725:
252:
233:
747:
285:
241:
had established a unified domestic regime the
Secretary of State had not exceeded his powers when making the 1995 regulations.
807:
27:
735:
511:
463:
458:
752:
740:
590:
757:
483:
871:
798:
769:
417:
280:
448:
786:
341:
74:
812:
762:
346:
295:
213:
188:
143:
517:
184:
803:
351:
840:
228:
The United States appealed to the
Supreme Court on two key grounds. Firstly that the
156:
774:
505:
139:
791:
779:
257:
180:
818:
317:"USA v Nolan: Supreme Court Confirms That s.188 Applies to US Base in UK"
105:
251:
355:
49:
The United States of
America (Appellant) v Nolan (Respondent)
612:
List of judges of the
Supreme Court of the United Kingdom
291:
2015 Judgments of the
Supreme Court of the United Kingdom
239:
Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992
230:
Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992
169:
Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992
101:
Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992
718:
622:
606:
567:
536:
527:
496:
431:
400:
389:
133:
125:
121:
Lord Neuberger, Lady Hale, Lord Mance and Lord Reed
117:
112:
93:
85:
80:
70:
62:
54:
44:
34:
20:
267:
367:
8:
533:
397:
374:
360:
352:
26:
17:
847:Supreme Court of the United Kingdom cases
171:to public administrative establishments.
216:procedure the Court of Appeal asked the
307:
867:United Kingdom–United States relations
829:Justices shown in order of appointment
218:Court of Justice of the European Union
7:
546:The Lord Phillips of Worth Matravers
153:The United States of America v Nolan
21:The United States of America v Nolan
383:Supreme Court of the United Kingdom
165:Supreme Court of the United Kingdom
39:Supreme Court of the United Kingdom
167:concerning the application of the
14:
877:History of the United States Army
748:Judiciaries of the United Kingdom
731:House of Lords judicial functions
552:The Lord Neuberger of Abbotsbury
315:Noblet, Caroline (October 2015).
469:Lord Stephens of Creevyloughgare
286:Redundancy in United Kingdom law
852:2015 in United Kingdom case law
808:Secretary of State for Justice
1:
585:The Baroness Hale of Richmond
558:The Baroness Hale of Richmond
234:European Communities Act 1972
736:List of House of Lords cases
260:base where Mrs Nolan worked.
753:Courts of England and Wales
479:Lord Richards of Camberwell
893:
758:Courts of Northern Ireland
579:The Lord Hope of Craighead
408:The Lord Reed of Allermuir
862:Termination of employment
857:United Kingdom labour law
827:
799:Law officers of the Crown
770:Law of the United Kingdom
444:Lord Briggs of Westbourne
281:United Kingdom labour law
138:
98:
25:
181:watercraft repair centre
787:Law of Northern Ireland
474:Lady Rose of Colmworth
454:Lord Hamblen of Kersey
342:Supreme Court judgment
272:
261:
179:Mrs Nolan worked at a
347:Video of the judgment
319:. Squire Patton Boggs
255:
58:15 & 16 July 2015
200:Employment Tribunals
813:Middlesex Guildhall
763:Courts of Scotland
296:European Union law
262:
256:A building at the
214:preliminary ruling
189:United States Army
144:European Union law
834:
833:
618:
617:
492:
491:
149:
148:
884:
872:Hythe, Hampshire
534:
439:Lord Lloyd-Jones
422:Deputy President
398:
376:
369:
362:
353:
329:
328:
326:
324:
312:
187:operated by the
185:Hythe, Hampshire
71:Neutral citation
30:
18:
892:
891:
887:
886:
885:
883:
882:
881:
837:
836:
835:
830:
823:
804:Lord Chancellor
714:
614:
602:
570:
563:
529:
523:
498:
488:
427:
392:
385:
380:
338:
333:
332:
322:
320:
314:
313:
309:
304:
277:
250:
226:
210:
208:Court of Appeal
202:
197:
177:
66:21 October 2015
12:
11:
5:
890:
888:
880:
879:
874:
869:
864:
859:
854:
849:
839:
838:
832:
831:
828:
825:
824:
822:
821:
816:
810:
801:
796:
795:
794:
789:
784:
783:
782:
767:
766:
765:
760:
755:
745:
744:
743:
738:
728:
722:
720:
716:
715:
713:
712:
707:
702:
697:
692:
687:
682:
677:
672:
667:
662:
657:
652:
647:
642:
637:
632:
626:
624:
620:
619:
616:
615:
610:
608:
604:
603:
601:
600:
594:
591:The Lord Mance
588:
582:
575:
573:
565:
564:
562:
561:
555:
549:
542:
540:
531:
525:
524:
522:
521:
515:
509:
502:
500:
494:
493:
490:
489:
487:
486:
481:
476:
471:
466:
461:
456:
451:
446:
441:
435:
433:
429:
428:
426:
425:
415:
404:
402:
395:
387:
386:
381:
379:
378:
371:
364:
356:
350:
349:
344:
337:
336:External links
334:
331:
330:
306:
305:
303:
300:
299:
298:
293:
288:
283:
276:
273:
249:
246:
225:
222:
209:
206:
201:
198:
196:
193:
176:
173:
147:
146:
136:
135:
131:
130:
127:
123:
122:
119:
115:
114:
110:
109:
96:
95:
91:
90:
87:
83:
82:
78:
77:
72:
68:
67:
64:
60:
59:
56:
52:
51:
46:
45:Full case name
42:
41:
36:
32:
31:
23:
22:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
889:
878:
875:
873:
870:
868:
865:
863:
860:
858:
855:
853:
850:
848:
845:
844:
842:
826:
820:
817:
814:
811:
809:
805:
802:
800:
797:
793:
790:
788:
785:
781:
778:
777:
776:
773:
772:
771:
768:
764:
761:
759:
756:
754:
751:
750:
749:
746:
742:
739:
737:
734:
733:
732:
729:
727:
724:
723:
721:
717:
711:
708:
706:
703:
701:
698:
696:
693:
691:
688:
686:
683:
681:
678:
676:
673:
671:
668:
666:
663:
661:
658:
656:
653:
651:
648:
646:
643:
641:
638:
636:
633:
631:
628:
627:
625:
621:
613:
609:
605:
598:
595:
592:
589:
586:
583:
580:
577:
576:
574:
572:
566:
559:
556:
553:
550:
547:
544:
543:
541:
539:
535:
532:
526:
519:
516:
513:
510:
507:
504:
503:
501:
495:
485:
482:
480:
477:
475:
472:
470:
467:
465:
462:
460:
457:
455:
452:
450:
447:
445:
442:
440:
437:
436:
434:
430:
423:
419:
416:
413:
409:
406:
405:
403:
399:
396:
394:
388:
384:
377:
372:
370:
365:
363:
358:
357:
354:
348:
345:
343:
340:
339:
335:
318:
311:
308:
301:
297:
294:
292:
289:
287:
284:
282:
279:
278:
274:
271:
266:
259:
254:
247:
245:
242:
240:
235:
231:
224:Supreme Court
223:
221:
219:
215:
207:
205:
199:
194:
192:
190:
186:
182:
174:
172:
170:
166:
162:
161:2015 judgment
158:
155:
154:
145:
141:
137:
132:
129:Lord Carnwath
128:
124:
120:
116:
113:Case opinions
111:
107:
102:
97:
92:
88:
86:Prior history
84:
79:
76:
73:
69:
65:
61:
57:
53:
50:
47:
43:
40:
37:
33:
29:
24:
19:
16:
726:Constitution
520:(since 2020)
512:Mark Ormerod
464:Lord Burrows
459:Lord Leggatt
321:. Retrieved
310:
268:
263:
248:Significance
243:
227:
211:
203:
178:
152:
151:
150:
81:Case history
48:
15:
775:English law
599:(2018–2020)
593:(2017–2018)
587:(2013–2017)
581:(2009–2013)
560:(2017–2020)
554:(2012–2017)
548:(2009–2012)
514:(2015–2020)
508:(2009–2015)
484:Lady Simler
323:23 December
134:Area of law
89:EWCA Civ 71
841:Categories
815:(location)
506:Jenny Rowe
449:Lord Sales
418:Lord Hodge
401:Leadership
302:References
212:Under the
140:Labour law
792:Scots law
780:Welsh law
741:Law Lords
623:Judgments
597:Lord Reed
571:President
538:President
518:Vicky Fox
499:Executive
412:President
258:RAF Hythe
108:requires.
819:UKSCblog
530:justices
393:justices
275:See also
195:Judgment
118:Majority
719:Related
391:Current
163:of the
157:UKSC 63
126:Dissent
94:Holding
75:UKSC 63
63:Decided
607:Judges
569:Deputy
528:Former
432:Judges
270:taken?
159:was a
106:EU law
55:Argued
497:Chief
175:Facts
35:Court
806:and
710:List
705:2024
700:2023
695:2022
690:2021
685:2020
680:2019
675:2018
670:2017
665:2016
660:2015
655:2014
650:2013
645:2012
640:2011
635:2010
630:2009
325:2015
99:The
183:in
843::
142:;
424:)
420:(
414:)
410:(
375:e
368:t
361:v
327:.
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
