Knowledge (XXG)

Theory of conjoint measurement

Source 📝

3040: 363:, the standard definition of measurement is the estimation of the ratio between a magnitude of a continuous quantity and a unit magnitude of the same kind (de Boer, 1994/95; Emerson, 2008). For example, the statement "Peter's hallway is 4 m long" expresses a measurement of an hitherto unknown length magnitude (the hallway's length) as the ratio of the unit (the metre in this case) to the length of the hallway. The number 4 is a real number in the strict mathematical sense of this term. 292:) which also contained a schema for deriving higher order cancellation conditions based upon Scott's (1964) work. Using Michell's schema, Ben Richards (Kyngdon & Richards, 2007) discovered that some instances of the triple cancellation axiom are "incoherent" as they contradict the single cancellation axiom. Moreover, he identified many instances of the triple cancellation which are trivially true if double cancellation is supported. 1874: 968: 582: 2929:'s (1927) theory of paired comparisons, multidimensional scaling and Coombs' (1964) theory of unidimensional unfolding. He found support of the cancellation axioms only with Coombs' (1964) theory. However, the statistical techniques employed by Michell (1990) in testing Thurstone's theory and multidimensional scaling did not take into consideration the ordinal constraints imposed by the cancellation axioms ( 3005:). Kyngdon found that satisfaction of the cancellation axioms was obtained only through permutation of the matrix in a manner inconsistent with the putative Lexile measures of item difficulty. Kyngdon also tested simulated ability test response data using polynomial conjoint measurement. The data were generated using Humphry's extended frame of reference Rasch model ( 2953:
applications biased towards a positive result. With six stimuli, the probability of an interstimulus midpoint order satisfying the double cancellation axioms at random is .5874 (Michell, 1994). This is not an unlikely event. Kyngdon & Richards (2007) employed eight statements and found the interstimulus midpoint orders rejected the double cancellation condition.
174:, 1940), Campbell and the Committee concluded that because psychological attributes were not capable of sustaining concatenation operations, such attributes could not be continuous quantities. Therefore, they could not be measured scientifically. This had important ramifications for psychology, the most significant of these being the creation in 1946 of the 99:. The quantification of psychological attributes such as attitudes, cognitive abilities and utility is therefore logically plausible. This means that the scientific measurement of psychological attributes is possible. That is, like physical quantities, a magnitude of a psychological quantity may possibly be expressed as the product of a 2982:) consisted of completion times and average number of series correct. They found support for the cancellation axioms, however, their study was biased by the small size of the conjoint arrays (3 × 3 is size) and by statistical techniques that did not take into consideration the ordinal restrictions imposed by the cancellation axioms. 201:(1901) anticipated features of the theory of conjoint measurement, it was not until the publication of Luce & Tukey's seminal 1964 paper that the theory received its first complete exposition. Luce & Tukey's presentation was algebraic and is therefore considered more general than Debreu's (1960) 2959:
applied conjoint measurement to item response data to a convict parole questionnaire and to intelligence test data gathered from Danish troops. They found considerable violation of the cancellation axioms in the parole questionnaire data, but not in the intelligence test data. Moreover, they recorded
444:
Length is a quantity for which natural concatenation operations exist. That is, we can combine in a side-by-side fashion lengths of rigid steel rods, for example, such that the additive relations between lengths is readily observed. If we have four 1 m lengths of such rods, we can place them end
217:
proved that via the theory of conjoint measurement, attributes not capable of concatenation could be quantified. N.R. Campbell and the Ferguson Committee were thus proven wrong. That a given psychological attribute is a continuous quantity is a logically coherent and empirically testable hypothesis.
153:
to estimate the parameters of additive utility functions. Different multi-attribute stimuli are presented to respondents, and different methods are used to measure their preferences about the presented stimuli. The coefficients of the utility function are estimated using alternative regression-based
374:
defined the unit of the Celsius scale to be 1/100th of the difference in temperature between the freezing and boiling points of water at sea level. A midday temperature measurement of 20 degrees Celsius is simply the difference of the midday temperature and the temperature of the freezing water
287:
Joel Michell (1988) later identified that the "no test" class of tests of the double cancellation axiom was empty. Any instance of double cancellation is thus either an acceptance or a rejection of the axiom. Michell also wrote at this time a non-technical introduction to the theory of conjoint
2952:
tested the cancellation axioms of upon the interstimulus midpoint orders obtained by the use of Coombs' (1964) theory of unidimensional unfolding. Coombs' theory in all three studies was applied to a set of six statements. These authors found that the axioms were satisfied, however, these were
2147:
possess three levels, the highest order cancellation axiom within Scott's (1964) hierarchy that indirectly tests solvability and Archimedeaness is double cancellation. With four levels it is triple cancellation (Figure 3). If such tests are satisfied, the construction of standard sequences in
2138:
are not amenable to direct testing in any finite empirical situation. But this does not entail that these axioms cannot be empirically tested at all. Scott's (1964) finite set of cancellation conditions can be used to indirectly test these axioms; the extent of such testing being empirically
456:
Temperature is a quantity for which there is an absence of concatenation operations. We cannot pour a volume of water of temperature 40 °C into another bucket of water at 20 °C and expect to have a volume of water with a temperature of 60 °C. Temperature is therefore an
314:
applications. Karabatsos & Ullrich 2002 demonstrated how this framework could be extended to polynomial conjoint structures. Karabatsos (2005) generalised this work with his multinomial Dirichlet framework, which enabled the probabilistic testing of many non-stochastic theories of
1725:= 3, then 3! × 3! = 6 × 6 = 36 instances in total of double cancellation. However, all but 6 of these instances are trivially true if single cancellation is true, and if any one of these 6 instances is true, then all of them are true. One such instance is that shown in Figure Two. ( 370:. Consider temperature, for example. In the familiar everyday instances, temperature is measured using instruments calibrated in either the Fahrenheit or Celsius scales. What are really being measured with such instruments are the magnitudes of temperature differences. For example, 267:
Shortly after the publication of Krantz, et al., (1971), work focused upon developing an "error theory" for the theory of conjoint measurement. Studies were conducted into the number of conjoint arrays that supported only single cancellation and both single and double cancellation
464:
Psychological attributes, like temperature, are considered to be intensive as no way of concatenating such attributes has been found. But this is not to say that such attributes are not quantifiable. The theory of conjoint measurement provides a theoretical means of doing this.
2630: 142:), however, this has been disputed (e.g., Karabatsos, 2001; Kyngdon, 2008). Order restricted methods for conducting probabilistic tests of the cancellation axioms of conjoint measurement have been developed in the past decade (e.g., Karabatsos, 2001; Davis-Stober, 2009). 2184:
can be expressed as either ratios between magnitudes or ratios between magnitude differences. It is most commonly interpreted as the latter, given that most behavioural scientists consider that their tests and surveys "measure" attributes on so-called "interval scales"
1051:
in which the common terms of two antecedent inequalities cancel out to produce a third inequality. Consider the instance of double cancellation graphically represented by Figure Two. The antecedent inequalities of this particular instance of double cancellation are:
2384: 2118:
whom wrote that "Further, of unequal lines, unequal surfaces, and unequal solids, the greater exceeds the less by such a magnitude as, when added to itself, can be made to exceed any assigned magnitude among those which are comparable with one another "
284:). These studies found that it is highly unlikely that the axioms of the theory of conjoint measurement are satisfied at random, provided that more than three levels of at least one of the component attributes has been identified. 94:
are continuous quantities. Hence the theory of conjoint measurement can be used to quantify attributes in empirical circumstances where it is not possible to combine the levels of the attributes using a side-by-side operation or
2123:, Book I, Assumption 5). Archimedes recognised that for any two magnitudes of a continuous quantity, one being lesser than the other, the lesser could be multiplied by a whole number such that it equalled the greater magnitude. 971:
Figure Two: A Luce–Tukey instance of double cancellation, in which the consequent inequality (broken line arrow) does not contradict the direction of both antecedent inequalities (solid line arrows), so supporting the
2693: 2974:) were defined by the demand placed upon working memory capacity through increasing numbers of working memory place keepers in letter series completion tasks. The rows were defined by levels of motivation ( 4367: 295:
The axioms of the theory of conjoint measurement are not stochastic; and given the ordinal constraints placed on data by the cancellation axioms, order restricted inference methodology must be used (
2525: 1881:
The single and double cancellation axioms by themselves are not sufficient to establish continuous quantity. Other conditions must also be introduced to ensure continuity. These are the
844:
causes confusion with statistical concepts of independence, single cancellation is the preferable term. Figure One is a graphical representation of one instance of single cancellation.
2489: 106:
Application of the theory of conjoint measurement in psychology, however, has been limited. It has been argued that this is due to the high level of formal mathematics involved (e.g.,
2246: 248:
providing a schema with which to construct conjoint measurement structures of three or more attributes. Later, the theory of conjoint measurement (in its two variable, polynomial and
2911:, summarized the literature to that date, including the observation that the evaluation of the Thomsen Condition also involves an empirical challenge that they find remedied by the 2078: 2449: 2418: 1424: 2860:
must be tentatively identified as the unit. Hence it would seem that application of conjoint measurement requires some prior descriptive theory of the relevant natural system.
1499:
Double cancellation is satisfied if and only if the consequent inequality does not contradict the antecedent inequalities. For example, if the consequent inequality above was:
1831: 1791: 1553: 1483: 1162: 2721: 1315: 1218: 1103: 166:
established the Ferguson Committee to investigate the possibility of psychological attributes being measured scientifically. The British physicist and measurement theorist
2517: 1610: 163: 1262: 1356: 417: 3069: 2960:
the supposed "no test" instances of double cancellation. Interpreting these correctly as instances in support of double cancellation (Michell, 1988), the results of
1736:
If single cancellation has been tested upon a set of data first and is established, then only the Luce–Tukey instances of double cancellation need to be tested. For
319:. More recently, Clintin Davis-Stober (2009) developed a frequentist framework for order restricted inference that can also be used to test the cancellation axioms. 4345:
Ullrich, J. R.; Wilson, R. E. (December 1993). "A note on the exact number of two and three way tables satisfying conjoint measurement and additivity axioms".
334:(Kahneman & Tversky, 1979). Prospect theory was a theory of decision making under risk and uncertainty which accounted for choice behaviour such as the 3595:
Karabatsos, G.; Sheu, C. F. (2004). "Bayesian order constrained inference for dichotomous models of unidimensional non-parametric item response theory".
840:, as the ordinal relation between two levels of an attribute is independent of any and all levels of the other attribute. However, given that the term 3009:). He found support of distributive, single and double cancellation consistent with a distributive polynomial conjoint structure in three variables ( 3844: 3822:
Kyngdon, A.; Richards, B. (2007). "Attitudes, order and quantity: deterministic and direct probabilistic tests of unidimensional unfolding".
2985:
Kyngdon (2011) used Karabatsos's (2001) order-restricted inference framework to test a conjoint matrix of reading item response proportions (
2947: 189: 2997:). The levels of reading ability were identified via raw total test score and the levels of reading item difficulty were identified by the 3233:
Davis-Stober, C. P. (February 2009). "Analysis of multinomial models under inequality constraints: applications to measurement theory".
2899:
observed that the evaluation of double cancellation involves considerable redundancy that complicates its empirical testing. Therefore,
3561: 3388:
Berichte Uber die Verhandlungen der Koeniglich Sachsischen Gesellschaft der Wissenschaften zu Leipzig, Mathematisch-Physikaliche Klasse
439: 3091: 339: 182:. Stevens' non-scientific theory of measurement is widely held as definitive in psychology and the behavioural sciences generally ( 338:. David Krantz wrote the formal proof to prospect theory using the theory of conjoint measurement. In 2002, Kahneman received the 4456: 3957:
McClelland, G. (June 1977). "A note on Arbuckle and Larimer: the number of two way tables satisfying certain additivity axioms".
4416: 2638: 4446: 241: 3539:
Karabatsos, G. (2001). "The Rasch model, additive conjoint measurement, and new models of probabilistic measurement theory".
3926:
Luce, R. D.; Tukey, J. W. (January 1964). "Simultaneous conjoint measurement: a new scale type of fundamental measurement".
3357:
Grayson, D. A. (September 1988). "Two-group classification and latent trait theory: scores with monotone likelihood ratio".
955:, is determined by the satisfaction of the single cancellation axiom, as are all the "left leaning diagonal" relations upon 146: 2625:{\displaystyle \varphi '_{A}=\alpha \varphi _{A}+\beta _{A}{\text{ and }}\varphi '_{X}=\alpha \varphi _{X}+\beta _{X}.\,} 225:(1964), who proposed a hierarchy of cancellation conditions for the indirect testing of the solvability and Archimedean 3166:
Brogden, H. E. (December 1977). "The Rasch model, the law of comparative judgement and additive conjoint measurement".
3052: 4441: 4162:
Stankov, L.; Cregan, A. (1993). "Quantitative and qualitative properties of an intelligence test: series completion".
2769:
The theory of conjoint measurement, however, is not restricted to the quantification of differences. If each level of
2762:. However, it is not clear from the literature as to how a unit could be defined within an additive conjoint context. 96: 3062: 3056: 3048: 1646:
approach infinity, then the number of right leaning diagonal relations is half of the number of total relations upon
847:
Satisfaction of the single cancellation axiom is necessary, but not sufficient, for the quantification of attributes
4184: 3890: 3254:
Debreu, G. (1960). "Topological methods in cardinal utility theory". In Arrow, K.J.; Karlin, S.; Suppes, P. (eds.).
4451: 3999:
Michell, J. (December 1988). "Some problems in testing the double cancellation condition in conjoint measurement".
2379:{\displaystyle (a,x)\succsim (b,y)\iff \varphi _{A}(a)+\varphi _{X}(x)\geqslant \varphi _{A}(b)+\varphi _{X}(y).} 2156:
are possible. Hence these attributes may be dense as per the real numbers or equally spaced as per the integers (
252:-component forms) received a thorough and highly technical treatment with the publication of the first volume of 3475:"Controlling the effect of stimulus context change on attitude statements using Michell's binary tree procedure" 3073: 2970:
applied conjoint measurement to performance on sequence completion tasks. The columns of their conjoint arrays (
2852:. All three must therefore be expressed in the same unit. In such cases, it would appear that a level of either 110:) and that the theory cannot account for the "noisy" data typically discovered in psychological research (e.g., 2454: 307: 4211:
Stenner, A. J.; Burdick, H.; Sanford, E. E.; Burdick, D. S. (2006). "How accurate are Lexile text measures?".
4185:"Evaluating a model of global psychophysical judgments I: Behavioral properties of summations and productions" 2912: 2805:
consists of densities measured as mass per unit of volume. In such cases, it would appear that one level of
2010: 316: 232:
Work soon focused on extending the theory of conjoint measurement to involve more than just two attributes.
1685:
The number of instances of double cancellation is contingent upon the number of levels identified for both
4436: 3935: 3917:
Luce, R. D.; Suppes, P. (2002). "Representational measurement theory". In Pashler, H.; Wixted, J. (eds.).
3764:
Kyngdon, A. (2008). "The Rasch model from the perspective of the representational theory of measurement".
3509: 3136: 867:
are ordered. Informally, single cancellation does not sufficiently constrain the order upon the levels of
167: 1364: 179: 3793:
Kyngdon, A. (2011). "Plausible measurement analogies to some psychometric models of test performance".
3722:
Krantz, D. H.; Tversky, A. (1971). "Conjoint measurement analysis of composition rules in psychology".
3106:
Arbuckle, J.; Larimer, J. (1976). "The number of two-way tables satisfying certain additivity axioms".
2904: 1925:
is solved, hence the name of the condition. Solvability essentially is the requirement that each level
4308: 3645:
Krantz, D. H. (July 1964). "Conjoint measurement: the Luce–Tukey axiomatisation and some extensions".
1795: 1755: 4241: 3449: 3281: 3022: 2423: 2392: 2128: 1505: 1435: 1114: 3940: 3514: 3141: 2698: 1270: 1173: 1058: 2494: 1562: 808:
cancel out to leave the same ordinal relationship holding on the remaining elements. For example,
4295: 4108: 4079: 3781: 3612: 3527: 3398:
Michell, J.; Ernst, C. (September 1996). "The axioms of quantity and the theory of measurement".
3374: 3297: 3212: 3183: 2189:). That is, they believe tests do not identify absolute zero levels of psychological attributes. 1964:
be a set of consecutive integers, either finite or infinite, positive or negative. The levels of
1226: 304: 4091:
Scheiblechner, H. (September 1999). "Additive conjoint isotonic probabilistic models (ADISOP)".
3562:"The exchangeable multinomial model as an approach for testing axioms of choice and measurement" 2176:
Satisfaction of the conditions of conjoint measurement means that measurements of the levels of
1323: 976:
Single cancellation does not determine the order of the "right-leaning diagonal" relations upon
384: 3666:
Krantz, D. H. (1968). "A survey of measurement theory". In Danzig, G.B.; Veinott, A.F. (eds.).
2978:), which consisted in different number of times available for completing the test. Their data ( 1873: 967: 581: 4257: 4220: 4046: 3877: 3831: 3810: 3752: 3692: 3624:
Karabatsos, G.; Ullrich, J. R. (2002). "Enumerating and testing conjoint measurement models".
3548: 3436: 3415: 3345: 3154: 2135: 322:
Perhaps the most notable (Kyngdon, 2011) use of the theory of conjoint measurement was in the
3309:
Fischer, G. (1995). "Derivations of the Rasch model". In Fischer, G.; Molenaar, I.W. (eds.).
4379: 4354: 4331: 4323: 4287: 4249: 4199: 4171: 4150: 4129: 4100: 4071: 4038: 4008: 3987: 3966: 3945: 3919:
Stevens' handbook of experimental psychology: Vol. 4. Methodology in experimental psychology
3905: 3867: 3859: 3802: 3773: 3731: 3684: 3654: 3633: 3604: 3584: 3576: 3519: 3486: 3461: 3407: 3366: 3335: 3327: 3289: 3242: 3204: 3175: 3146: 3115: 2907:
axiom, which avoids this redundancy, and found the property supported in binaural loudness.
229:, and David Krantz (1964) who connected the Luce & Tukey work to that of Hölder (1901). 36: 4417:
Kyngdon's R programs for enumerating cancellation tests, testing axioms and prospect theory
4406: 3318:
Gigerenzer, G.; Strube, G. (1983). "Are there limits to binaural additivity of loudness?".
2879:
Several empirical evaluations of the double cancellation have been conducted. Among these,
2750:
are magnitude differences measured relative to some kind of unit difference. Each level of
1865:) and the more stringent test of quantity the application of conjoint measurement becomes. 585:
Figure One: Graphical representation of the single cancellation axiom. It can be seen that
4141:
Sherman, K. (April 1994). "The effect of change in context in Coombs's unfolding theory".
3872: 2926: 327: 323: 3500:
Kahneman, D.; Tversky, A. (1979). "Prospect theory: an analysis of decision under risk".
2813:
must be identified as a tentative unit prior to the application of conjoint measurement.
445:
to end to produce a length of 4 m. Quantities capable of concatenation are known as
375:
divided by the difference of the Celsius unit and the temperature of the freezing water.
4245: 3891:"Theory and tests of the conjoint commutativity axiom for additive conjoint measurement" 3688: 3285: 3195:
Cliff, N. (1992). "Abstract measurement theory and the revolution that never happened".
2766:
proposed a scaling method for conjoint structures but he also did not discuss the unit.
2114:. This condition is a definition of continuity given by the ancient Greek mathematician 1630:
Double cancellation concerns the behaviour of the "right leaning diagonal" relations on
3978:
Michell, J. (June 1994). "Measuring dimensions of belief by unidimensional unfolding".
3863: 3208: 2732: 371: 335: 257: 198: 40: 3743:
Kyngdon, A. (2006). "An empirical study into the theory of unidimensional unfolding".
3637: 4430: 4327: 4299: 4175: 4133: 4112: 4012: 3970: 3949: 3785: 3658: 3616: 3465: 3378: 3340: 3301: 3293: 3216: 3187: 3119: 2884: 4411: 4083: 4029:
Michell, J. (February 2009). "The psychometricians' fallacy: Too clever by half?".
331: 311: 237: 449:
and include mass, time, electrical resistance and plane angle. These are known as
4253: 3427:
Humphry, S. M.; Andrich, D. (2008). "Understanding the unit in the Rasch model".
2735:
in Stevens’ (1946) parlance). The mathematical proof of this result is given in (
2451:
are two other real valued functions satisfying the above expression, there exist
804:
Single cancellation is so-called because a single common factor of two levels of
573:. These relations are presented as axioms in the theory of conjoint measurement. 3150: 1857:, the less probable it is that the cancellation axioms are satisfied at random ( 202: 115: 100: 4075: 2989:) where the examinee reading ability comprised the rows of the conjoint array ( 2868:
Empirical applications of the theory of conjoint measurement have been sparse (
2785:
is another different quantity whose measurement is expressed as a magnitude of
2131:, in which Euclid presented his theory of continuous quantity and measurement. 2102:
The Archimedean condition argues that there is no infinitely greatest level of
980:. Even though by transitivity and single cancellation it was established that ( 4203: 4154: 3909: 3580: 3491: 3474: 3331: 3246: 2115: 222: 44: 4042: 3806: 3777: 3608: 2919:
found conjoint commutativity supported for binaural loudness and brightness.
2887:
of binaural loudness. They found the double cancellation axiom was rejected.
781:, are ordered, then this order holds irrespective of each and every level of 3670:. Providence, Rhode Island: American Mathematical Society. pp. 314–350. 360: 150: 4358: 4261: 4224: 4050: 3991: 3835: 3814: 3756: 3715:
Foundations of Measurement, Vol. I: Additive and polynomial representations
3552: 3440: 3411: 3158: 2993:) and the difficulty of the reading items formed the columns of the array ( 170:
was an influential member of the committee. In its Final Report (Ferguson,
3881: 3696: 3419: 3349: 4336: 2095:
which can be found which makes two relevant ordered pairs, the levels of
1946: 1945:— they are either dense like the real numbers or equally spaced like the 276:). Later enumeration studies focused on polynomial conjoint measurement ( 221:
Appearing in the next issue of the same journal were important papers by
78:
are known to be quantities. Via specific relations between the levels of
54:
The theory concerns the situation where at least two natural attributes,
32: 3272:
Emerson, W. H. (2008). "On quantity calculus and units of measurement".
4383: 4104: 3531: 3370: 3179: 356: 3386:
Hölder, O. (1901). "Die Axiome der Quantität und die Lehre vom Mass".
1047:
The double cancellation axiom concerns a class of such relations upon
569:
depends upon the behaviour of the relation holding upon the levels of
4291: 4120:
Scott, D. (July 1964). "Measurement models and linear inequalities".
3735: 2998: 2124: 951:). The relation between these latter two ordered pairs, informally a 226: 118:
is a stochastic variant of the theory of conjoint measurement (e.g.,
3523: 3320:
Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance
3127:
Birnbaum, M. H. (2008). "New paradoxes of risky decision making".
2915:
axiom, which they show to be equivalent to the Thomsen Condition.
1872: 966: 580: 366:
For some other quantities, invariant are ratios between attribute
4271:
Luce's challenge: Quantitative models and statistical methodology
4232:
Stevens, S. S. (1946). "On the theory of scales of measurement".
1849:= 5 then there are 100. The greater the number of levels in both 145:
The theory of conjoint measurement is (different but) related to
3311:
Rasch models: Foundations, recent developments, and applications
3025: – Paradigm for the design, analysis, and scoring of tests 645:
The single cancellation axiom is as follows. The relation upon
3033: 2127:
stated the Archimedean condition as an axiom in Book V of the
1634:
as these are not logically entailed by single cancellation. (
149:, which is a statistical-experiments methodology employed in 4421: 4059: 3843:
Levelt, W. J. M.; Riemersma, J. B.; Bunt, A. A. (May 1972).
3002: 1752:, the number of Luce–Tukey double cancellation instances is 430:
is a real number and is a unit magnitude of the same kind.
4278:
Thurstone, L. L. (1927). "A law of comparative judgement".
2134:
As they involve infinitistic concepts, the solvability and
299:). George Karabatsos and his associates (Karabatsos, 2001; 4412:
Birnbaum's FORTRAN MONANOVA program for testing additivity
4031:
British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology
3852:
British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology
3795:
British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology
3713:
Krantz, D. H.; Luce, R.D; Suppes, P.; Tversky, A. (1971).
3706:
The New Psychometrics: Science, psychology and measurement
2688:{\displaystyle \varphi '_{A},\varphi _{A},\varphi '_{X}\,} 35:. It was independently discovered by the French economist 4022:
An Introduction to the Logic of Psychological Measurement
2891:
conducted a similar investigation and replicated Levelt,
1709:, then the number of instances of double cancellation is 489:
is a continuous quantity, or that both of them are. Let
4407:
Karabatsos' S-Plus programs for testing conjoint axioms
2736: 2157: 1950: 261: 1800: 1760: 836:. Krantz, et al., (1971) originally called this axiom 209:). In the first article of the inaugural issue of the 4309:"A general theory of polynomial conjoint measurement" 2701: 2641: 2528: 2497: 2457: 2426: 2395: 2249: 2013: 1798: 1758: 1658:
are quantities, half of the number of relations upon
1565: 1508: 1438: 1367: 1326: 1273: 1229: 1176: 1117: 1061: 387: 205:
work, the latter being a special case of the former (
39:(1960) and by the American mathematical psychologist 2731:
unique up to affine transformation (i.e. each is an
2172:
Relation to the scientific definition of measurement
1937:. Solvability reveals something about the levels of 517:
represent three independent, identifiable levels of
501:
represent three independent, identifiable levels of
2961: 2956: 2880: 111: 4060:"The Rasch model as additive conjoint measurement" 2715: 2687: 2624: 2511: 2483: 2443: 2412: 2378: 2106:and so hence there is no greatest level of either 2072: 1825: 1785: 1604: 1547: 1477: 1418: 1350: 1309: 1256: 1212: 1156: 1097: 525:, consists of the nine ordered pairs of levels of 411: 351:The classical / standard definition of measurement 164:British Association for the Advancement of Science 2916: 2908: 2900: 1877:Figure Three: An instance of triple cancellation. 1012:) remains undetermined. It could be that either ( 378:Formally expressed, a scientific measurement is: 326:proposed by the Israeli – American psychologists 277: 62:, non-interactively relate to a third attribute, 3061:but its sources remain unclear because it lacks 2896: 2888: 4058:Perline, R.; Wright, B. D.; Wainer, H. (1979). 3921:(3rd ed.). New York: Wiley. pp. 1–41. 1858: 1488:Hence double cancellation can only obtain when 1044:) and such ambiguity cannot remain unresolved. 296: 269: 3006: 2930: 773:). What this means is that if any two levels, 300: 256:, which Krantz, Luce, Tversky and philosopher 123: 3452:(1985). "Statistical issues in measurement". 3010: 2967: 1816: 1803: 1776: 1763: 281: 139: 16:General, formal theory of continuous quantity 8: 3668:Mathematics of the Decision Sciences: Part 2 3258:. Stanford University Press. pp. 16–26. 1670:and half are due to additive relations upon 1615:then double cancellation would be violated ( 31:) is a general, formal theory of continuous 3256:Mathematical Methods in the Social Sciences 2946:harv error: no target: CITEREFSherman1993 ( 2763: 1911:, the fourth exists such that the equation 879:. For example, consider the ordered pairs ( 188:harv error: no target: CITEREFMichell1999 ( 2287: 2283: 1862: 1841:= 4, then there are 16 such instances. If 855:. It only demonstrates that the levels of 273: 206: 4335: 3939: 3871: 3513: 3490: 3339: 3140: 3092:Learn how and when to remove this message 2712: 2706: 2700: 2684: 2675: 2662: 2646: 2640: 2621: 2612: 2599: 2580: 2571: 2565: 2552: 2533: 2527: 2508: 2502: 2496: 2484:{\displaystyle \alpha >0,\beta _{A}\,} 2480: 2474: 2456: 2440: 2431: 2425: 2409: 2400: 2394: 2358: 2336: 2314: 2292: 2248: 2046: 2021: 2012: 1815: 1802: 1799: 1797: 1775: 1762: 1759: 1757: 1564: 1507: 1437: 1366: 1325: 1272: 1228: 1175: 1116: 1060: 828:) as it is common to both sides, leaving 577:Single cancellation or independence axiom 386: 214: 48: 1429:Cancelling the common terms results in: 797:with respect to each and every level of 557:) (see Figure 1). The quantification of 3889:Luce, R. D.; Steingrimsson, R. (2011). 3263:Embretson, S. E.; Reise, S. P. (2000). 2941: 2940:), Kyngdon (2006), Michell (1994) and ( 2937: 2922: 2873: 1726: 1679: 1635: 1616: 289: 183: 127: 119: 4183:Steingrimsson, R; Luce, R. D. (2005). 3265:Item response theory for psychologists 2754:is a difference between the levels of 2073:{\displaystyle (a_{i},x)=(a_{i+1},y).} 903:). If single cancellation holds then ( 342:for prospect theory (Birnbaum, 2008). 245: 240:(1967) developed what became known as 233: 3313:. New York: Springer. pp. 15–38. 2869: 2186: 2083:What this basically means is that if 1895:means that for any three elements of 1638:) discovered that when the levels of 1619:) and it could not be concluded that 785:. The same holds for any two levels, 453:quantities in physics and metrology. 135: 131: 107: 7: 3675:Keats, J. A. (1967). "Test theory". 2964:are better than what they believed. 2864:Applications of conjoint measurement 2216:into the real numbers such that for 4164:Learning and Individual Differences 3689:10.1146/annurev.ps.18.020167.001245 2091:, for example, there are levels of 1419:{\displaystyle a+y+b+z>b+x+c+y.} 4347:Journal of Mathematical Psychology 4316:Journal of Mathematical Psychology 4192:Journal of Mathematical Psychology 4122:Journal of Mathematical Psychology 4001:Journal of Mathematical Psychology 3980:Journal of Mathematical Psychology 3959:Journal of Mathematical Psychology 3928:Journal of Mathematical Psychology 3898:Journal of Mathematical Psychology 3864:10.1111/j.2044-8317.1972.tb00477.x 3647:Journal of Mathematical Psychology 3569:Journal of Mathematical Psychology 3400:Journal of Mathematical Psychology 3235:Journal of Mathematical Psychology 3209:10.1111/j.1467-9280.1992.tb00024.x 3108:Journal of Mathematical Psychology 2519:real valued constants satisfying: 2208:, then there exist functions from 1869:Solvability and Archimedean axioms 1807: 1767: 1662:are due to ordinal relations upon 440:Intensive and extensive properties 426:is the magnitude of the quantity, 211:Journal of Mathematical Psychology 14: 4391:van der Ven, A. H. G. S. (1980). 4366:van der Linden, W. (March 1994). 4064:Applied Psychological Measurement 3845:"Binaural additivity of loudness" 3597:Applied Psychological Measurement 2962:Perline, Wright & Wainer 1979 2957:Perline, Wright & Wainer 1979 2903:evaluated instead the equivalent 2881:Levelt, Riemersma & Bunt 1972 2139:determined. For example, if both 1733:instance of double cancellation. 340:Nobel Memorial Prize in Economics 176:operational theory of measurement 112:Perline, Wright & Wainer 1979 4422:R statistical computing software 4143:Australian Journal of Psychology 3560:Karabatsos, G. (February 2005). 3479:Australian Journal of Psychology 3038: 1826:{\displaystyle {\tbinom {m}{3}}} 1786:{\displaystyle {\tbinom {n}{3}}} 473:Consider two natural attributes 434:Extensive and intensive quantity 197:Whilst the German mathematician 2444:{\displaystyle \varphi '_{X}\,} 2413:{\displaystyle \varphi '_{A}\,} 1548:{\displaystyle (a,z)<(c,x),} 1478:{\displaystyle (a,z)>(c,x).} 1157:{\displaystyle (b,z)>(c,y).} 812:cancels out of the inequality ( 242:polynomial conjoint measurement 114:). It has been argued that the 4213:Journal of Applied Measurement 3873:11858/00-001M-0000-0013-2CBF-1 3824:Journal of Applied Measurement 3745:Journal of Applied Measurement 3541:Journal of Applied Measurement 3429:Journal of Applied Measurement 2742:This means that the levels of 2716:{\displaystyle \varphi _{X}\,} 2370: 2364: 2348: 2342: 2326: 2320: 2304: 2298: 2284: 2280: 2268: 2262: 2250: 2064: 2039: 2033: 2014: 1596: 1584: 1578: 1566: 1539: 1527: 1521: 1509: 1469: 1457: 1451: 1439: 1310:{\displaystyle (b,z)>(c,y)} 1304: 1292: 1286: 1274: 1213:{\displaystyle (a,y)>(b,x)} 1207: 1195: 1189: 1177: 1148: 1136: 1130: 1118: 1098:{\displaystyle (a,y)>(b,x)} 1092: 1080: 1074: 1062: 481:. It is not known that either 406: 400: 346:Measurement and quantification 21:theory of conjoint measurement 1: 3638:10.1016/S0165-4896(02)00024-0 2917:Luce & Steingrimsson 2011 2909:Luce & Steingrimsson 2011 2901:Steingrimsson & Luce 2005 2848:are lengths so hence must be 996:), the relationship between ( 278:Karabatsos & Ullrich 2002 82:, it can be established that 29:additive conjoint measurement 4328:10.1016/0022-2496(67)90039-9 4254:10.1126/science.103.2684.677 4176:10.1016/1041-6080(93)90009-H 4134:10.1016/0022-2496(64)90002-1 4013:10.1016/0022-2496(88)90024-7 3971:10.1016/0022-2496(77)90035-9 3950:10.1016/0022-2496(64)90015-X 3659:10.1016/0022-2496(64)90003-3 3626:Mathematical Social Sciences 3466:10.1016/0165-4896(85)90031-9 3454:Mathematical Social Sciences 3120:10.1016/0022-2496(76)90036-5 2897:Gigerenzer & Strube 1983 2889:Gigerenzer & Strube 1983 2512:{\displaystyle \beta _{X}\,} 1972:if and only if there exists 1605:{\displaystyle (a,z)=(c,x),} 3717:. New York: Academic Press. 3677:Annual Review of Psychology 3151:10.1037/0033-295X.115.2.463 2883:evaluated the axiom to the 2773:is a product of a level of 2206:additive conjoint structure 2168:are continuous quantities. 1859:Arbuckle & Larimer 1976 1257:{\displaystyle a+y>b+x;} 935:). Hence via transitivity ( 297:Iverson & Falmagne 1985 270:Arbuckle & Larimer 1976 4473: 4368:"Review of Michell (1990)" 4076:10.1177/014662167900300213 3294:10.1088/0026-1394/45/2/002 3007:Humphry & Andrich 2008 2801:consists of volumes, then 2121:On the Sphere and Cylinder 1351:{\displaystyle b+z>c+y} 437: 412:{\displaystyle Q=r\times } 301:Karabatsos & Sheu 2004 254:Foundations of Measurement 124:Embretson & Reise 2000 66:. It is not required that 4204:10.1016/j.jmp.2005.03.003 4155:10.1080/00049539408259468 3910:10.1016/j.jmp.2011.05.004 3581:10.1016/j.jmp.2004.11.001 3492:10.1080/00049530108255118 3341:21.11116/0000-0000-BC9A-F 3332:10.1037/0096-1523.9.1.126 3247:10.1016/j.jmp.2008.08.003 3011:Krantz & Tversky 1971 2968:Stankov & Cregan 1993 2820:is the sum of a level of 963:Double cancellation axiom 282:Ullrich & Wilson 1993 4043:10.1348/000711007X243582 4024:. Hillsdale NJ: Erlbaum. 3807:10.1348/2044-8317.002004 3778:10.1177/0959354307086924 3609:10.1177/0146621603260678 3047:This article includes a 2832:is the same quantity as 308:Markov chain Monte Carlo 178:by Harvard psychologist 4457:Mathematical psychology 4393:Introduction to Scaling 3766:Theory & Psychology 3076:more precise citations. 3001:Framework for Reading ( 2797:consists of masses and 1320:is true if and only if 1223:is true if and only if 749:) is implied for every 689:) is implied for every 653:if and only if for all 317:mathematical psychology 4447:Latent variable models 4359:10.1006/jmps.1993.1037 4269:Stober, C. P. (2009). 3992:10.1006/jmps.1994.1016 3412:10.1006/jmps.1996.0023 3396:(Part 1 translated by 3224:Coombs, C. H. (1964). 2925:applied the theory to 2913:conjoint commutativity 2789:per unit magnitude of 2717: 2689: 2626: 2513: 2485: 2445: 2414: 2380: 2074: 1878: 1827: 1787: 1606: 1549: 1479: 1420: 1352: 1311: 1258: 1214: 1158: 1099: 973: 713:). Similarly, for all 642: 413: 207:Luce & Suppes 2002 168:Norman Robert Campbell 103:and a unit magnitude. 3197:Psychological Science 2718: 2690: 2627: 2514: 2486: 2446: 2415: 2381: 2075: 1992:and for all integers 1958:Archimedean condition 1876: 1828: 1788: 1607: 1550: 1480: 1421: 1353: 1312: 1259: 1215: 1159: 1100: 970: 953:left-leaning diagonal 584: 521:. A third attribute, 414: 215:Luce & Tukey 1964 180:Stanley Smith Stevens 49:Luce & Tukey 1964 4307:Tversky, A. (1967). 4280:Psychological Review 4020:Michell, J. (1990). 3724:Psychological Review 3708:. London: Routledge. 3473:Johnson, T. (2001). 3129:Psychological Review 3023:Item response theory 2723:are measurements of 2699: 2639: 2526: 2495: 2455: 2424: 2393: 2247: 2011: 1796: 1756: 1563: 1506: 1436: 1365: 1324: 1271: 1227: 1174: 1115: 1059: 447:extensive quantities 385: 25:conjoint measurement 4246:1946Sci...103..677S 3286:2008Metro..45..134E 3003:Stenner et al. 2006 2931:van der Linden 1994 2739:, pp. 261–6). 2683: 2654: 2588: 2541: 2439: 2408: 2160:). In other words, 1960:is as follows. Let 1358:, it follows that: 651:single cancellation 158:Historical overview 4442:Statistical theory 4395:. New York: Wiley. 4384:10.1007/BF02294273 4105:10.1007/BF02294297 3704:Kline, P. (1998). 3371:10.1007/BF02294219 3228:. New York: Wiley. 3180:10.1007/BF02295985 3049:list of references 2737:Krantz et al. 1971 2713: 2685: 2671: 2642: 2622: 2576: 2529: 2509: 2481: 2441: 2427: 2410: 2396: 2376: 2158:Krantz et al. 1971 2136:Archimedean axioms 2070: 1951:Krantz et al. 1971 1933:and an element in 1929:has an element in 1879: 1833:. For example, if 1823: 1821: 1783: 1781: 1602: 1545: 1475: 1416: 1348: 1307: 1254: 1210: 1154: 1095: 974: 643: 409: 262:Krantz et al. 1971 162:In the 1930s, the 140:Scheiblechner 1999 4452:Economic theories 4240:(2684): 667–680. 3102: 3101: 3094: 2905:Thomsen condition 2895:(1972) findings. 2816:If each level of 2809:and one level of 2574: 2148:differences upon 1970:standard sequence 1814: 1774: 1717:!. Therefore, if 1555:or alternatively, 147:conjoint analysis 43:and statistician 4464: 4396: 4387: 4362: 4341: 4339: 4313: 4303: 4292:10.1037/h0070288 4274: 4265: 4228: 4207: 4189: 4179: 4158: 4137: 4116: 4087: 4054: 4025: 4016: 3995: 3974: 3953: 3943: 3922: 3913: 3895: 3885: 3875: 3849: 3839: 3818: 3789: 3760: 3739: 3736:10.1037/h0030637 3718: 3709: 3700: 3671: 3662: 3641: 3620: 3591: 3589: 3583:. Archived from 3566: 3556: 3535: 3517: 3496: 3494: 3469: 3444: 3423: 3395: 3382: 3353: 3343: 3314: 3305: 3268: 3259: 3250: 3229: 3226:A Theory of Data 3220: 3191: 3162: 3144: 3123: 3097: 3090: 3086: 3083: 3077: 3072:this article by 3063:inline citations 3042: 3041: 3034: 2951: 2764:van der Ven 1980 2722: 2720: 2719: 2714: 2711: 2710: 2694: 2692: 2691: 2686: 2679: 2667: 2666: 2650: 2631: 2629: 2628: 2623: 2617: 2616: 2604: 2603: 2584: 2575: 2572: 2570: 2569: 2557: 2556: 2537: 2518: 2516: 2515: 2510: 2507: 2506: 2490: 2488: 2487: 2482: 2479: 2478: 2450: 2448: 2447: 2442: 2435: 2419: 2417: 2416: 2411: 2404: 2385: 2383: 2382: 2377: 2363: 2362: 2341: 2340: 2319: 2318: 2297: 2296: 2087:is greater than 2079: 2077: 2076: 2071: 2057: 2056: 2026: 2025: 1832: 1830: 1829: 1824: 1822: 1820: 1819: 1806: 1792: 1790: 1789: 1784: 1782: 1780: 1779: 1766: 1627:are quantities. 1611: 1609: 1608: 1603: 1554: 1552: 1551: 1546: 1496:are quantities. 1484: 1482: 1481: 1476: 1425: 1423: 1422: 1417: 1357: 1355: 1354: 1349: 1316: 1314: 1313: 1308: 1263: 1261: 1260: 1255: 1219: 1217: 1216: 1211: 1163: 1161: 1160: 1155: 1104: 1102: 1101: 1096: 418: 416: 415: 410: 310:methodology for 193: 4472: 4471: 4467: 4466: 4465: 4463: 4462: 4461: 4427: 4426: 4403: 4390: 4365: 4344: 4311: 4306: 4277: 4268: 4231: 4210: 4187: 4182: 4161: 4140: 4119: 4090: 4057: 4028: 4019: 3998: 3977: 3956: 3941:10.1.1.334.5018 3925: 3916: 3893: 3888: 3847: 3842: 3821: 3792: 3763: 3742: 3721: 3712: 3703: 3674: 3665: 3644: 3623: 3594: 3587: 3564: 3559: 3538: 3524:10.2307/1914185 3515:10.1.1.407.1910 3499: 3472: 3450:Falmagne, J. C. 3447: 3426: 3397: 3385: 3356: 3317: 3308: 3271: 3262: 3253: 3232: 3223: 3194: 3165: 3142:10.1.1.144.5661 3126: 3105: 3098: 3087: 3081: 3078: 3067: 3053:related reading 3043: 3039: 3032: 3019: 2945: 2927:L. L. Thurstone 2866: 2840:. For example, 2824:and a level of 2793:. For example, 2777:and a level of 2702: 2697: 2696: 2658: 2637: 2636: 2608: 2595: 2573: and  2561: 2548: 2524: 2523: 2498: 2493: 2492: 2470: 2453: 2452: 2422: 2421: 2391: 2390: 2354: 2332: 2310: 2288: 2245: 2244: 2174: 2042: 2017: 2009: 2008: 1871: 1863:McClelland 1977 1801: 1794: 1793: 1761: 1754: 1753: 1729:) calls this a 1693:. If there are 1561: 1560: 1504: 1503: 1434: 1433: 1363: 1362: 1322: 1321: 1269: 1268: 1225: 1224: 1172: 1171: 1113: 1112: 1057: 1056: 965: 579: 471: 442: 436: 383: 382: 353: 348: 328:Daniel Kahneman 324:prospect theory 274:McClelland 1977 187: 160: 23:(also known as 17: 12: 11: 5: 4470: 4468: 4460: 4459: 4454: 4449: 4444: 4439: 4429: 4428: 4425: 4424: 4419: 4414: 4409: 4402: 4401:External links 4399: 4398: 4397: 4388: 4378:(1): 139–142. 4363: 4342: 4304: 4286:(4): 278–286. 4275: 4266: 4229: 4219:(3): 307–322. 4208: 4198:(4): 290–306. 4180: 4170:(2): 137–169. 4159: 4138: 4128:(2): 233–247. 4117: 4099:(3): 295–316. 4088: 4070:(2): 237–255. 4055: 4026: 4017: 4007:(4): 466–473. 3996: 3986:(2): 224–273. 3975: 3954: 3923: 3914: 3904:(5): 379–389. 3886: 3840: 3819: 3801:(3): 478–497. 3790: 3761: 3751:(4): 369–393. 3740: 3730:(2): 151–169. 3719: 3710: 3701: 3672: 3663: 3653:(2): 248–277. 3642: 3632:(3): 485–504. 3621: 3603:(2): 110–125. 3592: 3590:on 2006-02-06. 3557: 3547:(4): 389–423. 3536: 3508:(2): 263–291. 3497: 3470: 3460:(2): 131–153. 3445: 3435:(3): 249–264. 3424: 3406:(3): 235–252. 3383: 3365:(3): 383–392. 3354: 3326:(1): 126–136. 3315: 3306: 3280:(2): 134–138. 3269: 3260: 3251: 3230: 3221: 3203:(3): 186–190. 3192: 3163: 3135:(2): 463–501. 3124: 3100: 3099: 3057:external links 3046: 3044: 3037: 3031: 3028: 3027: 3026: 3018: 3015: 2865: 2862: 2733:interval scale 2709: 2705: 2682: 2678: 2674: 2670: 2665: 2661: 2657: 2653: 2649: 2645: 2633: 2632: 2620: 2615: 2611: 2607: 2602: 2598: 2594: 2591: 2587: 2583: 2579: 2568: 2564: 2560: 2555: 2551: 2547: 2544: 2540: 2536: 2532: 2505: 2501: 2477: 2473: 2469: 2466: 2463: 2460: 2438: 2434: 2430: 2407: 2403: 2399: 2387: 2386: 2375: 2372: 2369: 2366: 2361: 2357: 2353: 2350: 2347: 2344: 2339: 2335: 2331: 2328: 2325: 2322: 2317: 2313: 2309: 2306: 2303: 2300: 2295: 2291: 2286: 2282: 2279: 2276: 2273: 2270: 2267: 2264: 2261: 2258: 2255: 2252: 2173: 2170: 2081: 2080: 2069: 2066: 2063: 2060: 2055: 2052: 2049: 2045: 2041: 2038: 2035: 2032: 2029: 2024: 2020: 2016: 1870: 1867: 1818: 1813: 1810: 1805: 1778: 1773: 1770: 1765: 1613: 1612: 1601: 1598: 1595: 1592: 1589: 1586: 1583: 1580: 1577: 1574: 1571: 1568: 1557: 1556: 1544: 1541: 1538: 1535: 1532: 1529: 1526: 1523: 1520: 1517: 1514: 1511: 1486: 1485: 1474: 1471: 1468: 1465: 1462: 1459: 1456: 1453: 1450: 1447: 1444: 1441: 1427: 1426: 1415: 1412: 1409: 1406: 1403: 1400: 1397: 1394: 1391: 1388: 1385: 1382: 1379: 1376: 1373: 1370: 1347: 1344: 1341: 1338: 1335: 1332: 1329: 1318: 1317: 1306: 1303: 1300: 1297: 1294: 1291: 1288: 1285: 1282: 1279: 1276: 1253: 1250: 1247: 1244: 1241: 1238: 1235: 1232: 1221: 1220: 1209: 1206: 1203: 1200: 1197: 1194: 1191: 1188: 1185: 1182: 1179: 1165: 1164: 1153: 1150: 1147: 1144: 1141: 1138: 1135: 1132: 1129: 1126: 1123: 1120: 1106: 1105: 1094: 1091: 1088: 1085: 1082: 1079: 1076: 1073: 1070: 1067: 1064: 964: 961: 578: 575: 470: 467: 438:Main article: 435: 432: 420: 419: 408: 405: 402: 399: 396: 393: 390: 372:Anders Celsius 352: 349: 347: 344: 336:Allais Paradox 303:) developed a 258:Patrick Suppes 159: 156: 41:R. Duncan Luce 15: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 4469: 4458: 4455: 4453: 4450: 4448: 4445: 4443: 4440: 4438: 4437:Psychometrics 4435: 4434: 4432: 4423: 4420: 4418: 4415: 4413: 4410: 4408: 4405: 4404: 4400: 4394: 4389: 4385: 4381: 4377: 4373: 4372:Psychometrika 4369: 4364: 4360: 4356: 4352: 4348: 4343: 4338: 4337:2027.42/33362 4333: 4329: 4325: 4321: 4317: 4310: 4305: 4301: 4297: 4293: 4289: 4285: 4281: 4276: 4272: 4267: 4263: 4259: 4255: 4251: 4247: 4243: 4239: 4235: 4230: 4226: 4222: 4218: 4214: 4209: 4205: 4201: 4197: 4193: 4186: 4181: 4177: 4173: 4169: 4165: 4160: 4156: 4152: 4148: 4144: 4139: 4135: 4131: 4127: 4123: 4118: 4114: 4110: 4106: 4102: 4098: 4094: 4093:Psychometrika 4089: 4085: 4081: 4077: 4073: 4069: 4065: 4061: 4056: 4052: 4048: 4044: 4040: 4036: 4032: 4027: 4023: 4018: 4014: 4010: 4006: 4002: 3997: 3993: 3989: 3985: 3981: 3976: 3972: 3968: 3964: 3960: 3955: 3951: 3947: 3942: 3937: 3933: 3929: 3924: 3920: 3915: 3911: 3907: 3903: 3899: 3892: 3887: 3883: 3879: 3874: 3869: 3865: 3861: 3857: 3853: 3846: 3841: 3837: 3833: 3829: 3825: 3820: 3816: 3812: 3808: 3804: 3800: 3796: 3791: 3787: 3783: 3779: 3775: 3771: 3767: 3762: 3758: 3754: 3750: 3746: 3741: 3737: 3733: 3729: 3725: 3720: 3716: 3711: 3707: 3702: 3698: 3694: 3690: 3686: 3682: 3678: 3673: 3669: 3664: 3660: 3656: 3652: 3648: 3643: 3639: 3635: 3631: 3627: 3622: 3618: 3614: 3610: 3606: 3602: 3598: 3593: 3586: 3582: 3578: 3574: 3570: 3563: 3558: 3554: 3550: 3546: 3542: 3537: 3533: 3529: 3525: 3521: 3516: 3511: 3507: 3503: 3498: 3493: 3488: 3484: 3480: 3476: 3471: 3467: 3463: 3459: 3455: 3451: 3448:Iverson, G.; 3446: 3442: 3438: 3434: 3430: 3425: 3421: 3417: 3413: 3409: 3405: 3401: 3393: 3389: 3384: 3380: 3376: 3372: 3368: 3364: 3360: 3359:Psychometrika 3355: 3351: 3347: 3342: 3337: 3333: 3329: 3325: 3321: 3316: 3312: 3307: 3303: 3299: 3295: 3291: 3287: 3283: 3279: 3275: 3270: 3266: 3261: 3257: 3252: 3248: 3244: 3240: 3236: 3231: 3227: 3222: 3218: 3214: 3210: 3206: 3202: 3198: 3193: 3189: 3185: 3181: 3177: 3173: 3169: 3168:Psychometrika 3164: 3160: 3156: 3152: 3148: 3143: 3138: 3134: 3130: 3125: 3121: 3117: 3113: 3109: 3104: 3103: 3096: 3093: 3085: 3075: 3071: 3065: 3064: 3058: 3054: 3050: 3045: 3036: 3035: 3029: 3024: 3021: 3020: 3016: 3014: 3012: 3008: 3004: 3000: 2996: 2992: 2988: 2983: 2981: 2977: 2973: 2969: 2965: 2963: 2958: 2954: 2949: 2943: 2939: 2934: 2932: 2928: 2924: 2920: 2918: 2914: 2910: 2906: 2902: 2898: 2894: 2890: 2886: 2885:psychophysics 2882: 2877: 2875: 2871: 2863: 2861: 2859: 2855: 2851: 2847: 2843: 2839: 2835: 2831: 2827: 2823: 2819: 2814: 2812: 2808: 2804: 2800: 2796: 2792: 2788: 2784: 2780: 2776: 2772: 2767: 2765: 2761: 2757: 2753: 2749: 2745: 2740: 2738: 2734: 2730: 2726: 2707: 2703: 2680: 2676: 2672: 2668: 2663: 2659: 2655: 2651: 2647: 2643: 2618: 2613: 2609: 2605: 2600: 2596: 2592: 2589: 2585: 2581: 2577: 2566: 2562: 2558: 2553: 2549: 2545: 2542: 2538: 2534: 2530: 2522: 2521: 2520: 2503: 2499: 2475: 2471: 2467: 2464: 2461: 2458: 2436: 2432: 2428: 2405: 2401: 2397: 2373: 2367: 2359: 2355: 2351: 2345: 2337: 2333: 2329: 2323: 2315: 2311: 2307: 2301: 2293: 2289: 2277: 2274: 2271: 2265: 2259: 2256: 2253: 2243: 2242: 2241: 2239: 2235: 2231: 2227: 2223: 2219: 2215: 2211: 2207: 2203: 2199: 2195: 2192:Formally, if 2190: 2188: 2183: 2179: 2171: 2169: 2167: 2163: 2159: 2155: 2151: 2146: 2142: 2137: 2132: 2130: 2126: 2122: 2117: 2113: 2109: 2105: 2100: 2098: 2094: 2090: 2086: 2067: 2061: 2058: 2053: 2050: 2047: 2043: 2036: 2030: 2027: 2022: 2018: 2007: 2006: 2005: 2003: 1999: 1995: 1991: 1987: 1983: 1979: 1975: 1971: 1967: 1963: 1959: 1954: 1952: 1948: 1944: 1940: 1936: 1932: 1928: 1924: 1921: 1917: 1914: 1910: 1906: 1902: 1898: 1894: 1890: 1888: 1884: 1875: 1868: 1866: 1864: 1860: 1856: 1852: 1848: 1844: 1840: 1836: 1811: 1808: 1771: 1768: 1751: 1747: 1743: 1739: 1734: 1732: 1728: 1724: 1720: 1716: 1712: 1708: 1704: 1700: 1696: 1692: 1688: 1683: 1681: 1677: 1673: 1669: 1665: 1661: 1657: 1653: 1649: 1645: 1641: 1637: 1633: 1628: 1626: 1622: 1618: 1599: 1593: 1590: 1587: 1581: 1575: 1572: 1569: 1559: 1558: 1542: 1536: 1533: 1530: 1524: 1518: 1515: 1512: 1502: 1501: 1500: 1497: 1495: 1491: 1472: 1466: 1463: 1460: 1454: 1448: 1445: 1442: 1432: 1431: 1430: 1413: 1410: 1407: 1404: 1401: 1398: 1395: 1392: 1389: 1386: 1383: 1380: 1377: 1374: 1371: 1368: 1361: 1360: 1359: 1345: 1342: 1339: 1336: 1333: 1330: 1327: 1301: 1298: 1295: 1289: 1283: 1280: 1277: 1267: 1266: 1265: 1251: 1248: 1245: 1242: 1239: 1236: 1233: 1230: 1204: 1201: 1198: 1192: 1186: 1183: 1180: 1170: 1169: 1168: 1151: 1145: 1142: 1139: 1133: 1127: 1124: 1121: 1111: 1110: 1109: 1089: 1086: 1083: 1077: 1071: 1068: 1065: 1055: 1054: 1053: 1050: 1045: 1043: 1039: 1035: 1031: 1027: 1023: 1019: 1015: 1011: 1007: 1003: 999: 995: 991: 987: 983: 979: 969: 962: 960: 958: 954: 950: 946: 942: 938: 934: 930: 926: 922: 918: 914: 910: 906: 902: 898: 894: 890: 886: 882: 878: 874: 870: 866: 862: 858: 854: 850: 845: 843: 839: 835: 831: 827: 823: 819: 815: 811: 807: 802: 800: 796: 792: 788: 784: 780: 776: 772: 768: 764: 760: 756: 752: 748: 744: 740: 736: 732: 728: 724: 720: 716: 712: 708: 704: 700: 696: 692: 688: 684: 680: 676: 672: 668: 664: 660: 656: 652: 648: 640: 636: 632: 628: 624: 620: 616: 612: 608: 604: 600: 596: 592: 588: 583: 576: 574: 572: 568: 564: 560: 556: 552: 548: 544: 540: 536: 532: 528: 524: 520: 516: 512: 508: 504: 500: 496: 492: 488: 484: 480: 476: 468: 466: 462: 460: 454: 452: 448: 441: 433: 431: 429: 425: 403: 397: 394: 391: 388: 381: 380: 379: 376: 373: 369: 364: 362: 358: 350: 345: 343: 341: 337: 333: 329: 325: 320: 318: 313: 309: 306: 302: 298: 293: 291: 288:measurement ( 285: 283: 279: 275: 271: 265: 263: 259: 255: 251: 247: 243: 239: 235: 230: 228: 224: 219: 216: 212: 208: 204: 200: 195: 191: 185: 181: 177: 173: 169: 165: 157: 155: 152: 148: 143: 141: 137: 133: 129: 125: 121: 117: 113: 109: 104: 102: 98: 97:concatenation 93: 89: 85: 81: 77: 73: 69: 65: 61: 57: 52: 50: 46: 42: 38: 37:Gérard Debreu 34: 30: 26: 22: 4392: 4375: 4371: 4353:(4): 624–8. 4350: 4346: 4319: 4315: 4283: 4279: 4270: 4237: 4233: 4216: 4212: 4195: 4191: 4167: 4163: 4149:(1): 41–47. 4146: 4142: 4125: 4121: 4096: 4092: 4067: 4063: 4037:(1): 41–55. 4034: 4030: 4021: 4004: 4000: 3983: 3979: 3965:(3): 292–5. 3962: 3958: 3931: 3927: 3918: 3901: 3897: 3858:(1): 51–68. 3855: 3851: 3827: 3823: 3798: 3794: 3769: 3765: 3748: 3744: 3727: 3723: 3714: 3705: 3680: 3676: 3667: 3650: 3646: 3629: 3625: 3600: 3596: 3585:the original 3575:(1): 51–69. 3572: 3568: 3544: 3540: 3505: 3502:Econometrica 3501: 3482: 3478: 3457: 3453: 3432: 3428: 3403: 3399: 3391: 3387: 3362: 3358: 3323: 3319: 3310: 3277: 3273: 3264: 3255: 3238: 3234: 3225: 3200: 3196: 3174:(4): 631–4. 3171: 3167: 3132: 3128: 3111: 3107: 3088: 3079: 3068:Please help 3060: 2994: 2990: 2986: 2984: 2979: 2975: 2971: 2966: 2955: 2942:Sherman 1993 2938:Johnson 2001 2935: 2923:Michell 1990 2921: 2892: 2878: 2874:Michell 2009 2867: 2857: 2853: 2849: 2845: 2841: 2837: 2833: 2829: 2825: 2821: 2817: 2815: 2810: 2806: 2802: 2798: 2794: 2790: 2786: 2782: 2778: 2774: 2770: 2768: 2759: 2755: 2751: 2747: 2743: 2741: 2728: 2724: 2634: 2388: 2237: 2233: 2229: 2225: 2221: 2217: 2213: 2209: 2205: 2201: 2197: 2193: 2191: 2181: 2177: 2175: 2165: 2161: 2153: 2149: 2144: 2140: 2133: 2120: 2111: 2107: 2103: 2101: 2096: 2092: 2088: 2084: 2082: 2001: 1997: 1993: 1989: 1985: 1981: 1977: 1973: 1969: 1965: 1961: 1957: 1955: 1942: 1938: 1934: 1930: 1926: 1922: 1919: 1915: 1912: 1908: 1904: 1900: 1896: 1892: 1891: 1889:conditions. 1886: 1882: 1880: 1854: 1850: 1846: 1842: 1838: 1834: 1749: 1745: 1741: 1737: 1735: 1730: 1727:Michell 1988 1722: 1718: 1714: 1710: 1706: 1702: 1698: 1694: 1690: 1686: 1684: 1680:Michell 2009 1675: 1671: 1667: 1663: 1659: 1655: 1651: 1647: 1643: 1639: 1636:Michell 2009 1631: 1629: 1624: 1620: 1617:Michell 1988 1614: 1498: 1493: 1489: 1487: 1428: 1319: 1222: 1167:Given that: 1166: 1107: 1048: 1046: 1041: 1037: 1033: 1029: 1025: 1021: 1017: 1013: 1009: 1005: 1001: 997: 993: 989: 985: 981: 977: 975: 956: 952: 948: 944: 940: 936: 932: 928: 924: 920: 916: 912: 908: 904: 900: 896: 892: 888: 884: 880: 876: 872: 871:to quantify 868: 864: 860: 856: 852: 848: 846: 842:independence 841: 838:independence 837: 833: 829: 825: 821: 817: 813: 809: 805: 803: 798: 794: 790: 786: 782: 778: 774: 770: 766: 762: 758: 754: 750: 746: 742: 738: 734: 730: 726: 722: 718: 714: 710: 706: 702: 698: 694: 690: 686: 682: 678: 674: 670: 666: 662: 658: 654: 650: 646: 644: 638: 634: 630: 626: 622: 618: 614: 610: 606: 602: 598: 594: 590: 586: 570: 566: 562: 558: 554: 550: 546: 542: 538: 534: 533:. That is, ( 530: 526: 522: 518: 514: 510: 506: 502: 498: 494: 490: 486: 482: 478: 474: 472: 463: 458: 455: 450: 446: 443: 427: 423: 421: 377: 367: 365: 354: 332:Amos Tversky 321: 312:psychometric 294: 290:Michell 1990 286: 266: 253: 249: 238:Amos Tversky 231: 220: 210: 196: 184:Michell 1999 175: 171: 161: 144: 128:Fischer 1995 120:Brogden 1977 105: 91: 87: 83: 79: 75: 71: 67: 63: 59: 55: 53: 28: 24: 20: 18: 3934:(1): 1–27. 3830:(1): 1–34. 3683:: 217–238. 3241:(1): 1–13. 3082:August 2011 3074:introducing 1893:Solvability 1887:Archimedean 1883:solvability 1650:. Hence if 757:such that ( 697:such that ( 368:differences 246:Krantz 1968 234:Krantz 1968 203:topological 199:Otto Hölder 116:Rasch model 101:real number 4431:Categories 3772:: 89–109. 3274:Metrologia 3267:. Erlbaum. 3114:: 89–100. 3030:References 2870:Cliff 1992 2187:Kline 1998 2116:Archimedes 1740:levels of 1731:Luce–Tukey 1697:levels of 649:satisfies 505:; and let 461:quantity. 223:Dana Scott 136:Kline 1998 132:Keats 1967 108:Cliff 1992 45:John Tukey 4300:144782881 4113:120080826 3936:CiteSeerX 3786:143679173 3617:122303701 3510:CiteSeerX 3485:: 23–28. 3379:121684695 3302:121451085 3217:144507788 3188:123583660 3137:CiteSeerX 2704:φ 2673:φ 2660:φ 2644:φ 2635:That is, 2610:β 2597:φ 2593:α 2578:φ 2563:β 2550:φ 2546:α 2531:φ 2500:β 2472:β 2459:α 2429:φ 2398:φ 2356:φ 2334:φ 2330:⩾ 2312:φ 2290:φ 2285:⟺ 2266:≿ 2099:, equal. 593:because ( 459:intensive 398:× 361:metrology 260:cowrote ( 151:marketing 4322:: 1–20. 4262:17750512 4225:16807496 4084:53706504 4051:17908369 3836:17215563 3815:21973097 3757:17068378 3553:12011506 3441:18753694 3159:18426300 3017:See also 2681:′ 2652:′ 2586:′ 2539:′ 2437:′ 2406:′ 2204:form an 2129:Elements 1947:integers 1036:) > ( 1020:) > ( 988:) > ( 943:) > ( 927:) > ( 911:) > ( 820:) > ( 765:) > ( 741:) > ( 705:) > ( 681:) > ( 633:) > ( 617:) > ( 601:) > ( 549:),..., ( 305:Bayesian 33:quantity 4242:Bibcode 4234:Science 3882:5031649 3697:5333423 3532:1914185 3420:8979975 3394:: 1–46. 3350:6220118 3282:Bibcode 3070:improve 2893:et al.' 2828:, then 2781:, then 2000:+ 1 in 1968:form a 1004:) and ( 919:) and ( 895:) and ( 625:) and ( 357:physics 244:, with 154:tools. 4298:  4260:  4223:  4111:  4082:  4049:  3938:  3880:  3834:  3813:  3784:  3755:  3695:  3615:  3551:  3530:  3512:  3439:  3418:  3377:  3348:  3300:  3215:  3186:  3157:  3139:  2999:Lexile 2125:Euclid 1984:where 1028:) or ( 972:axiom. 665:, and 497:, and 477:, and 469:Theory 422:where 227:axioms 172:et al. 4312:(PDF) 4296:S2CID 4188:(PDF) 4109:S2CID 4080:S2CID 3894:(PDF) 3848:(PDF) 3782:S2CID 3613:S2CID 3588:(PDF) 3565:(PDF) 3528:JSTOR 3375:S2CID 3298:S2CID 3213:S2CID 3184:S2CID 3055:, or 832:> 589:> 4258:PMID 4221:PMID 4047:PMID 3878:PMID 3832:PMID 3811:PMID 3753:PMID 3693:PMID 3549:PMID 3437:PMID 3416:PMID 3346:PMID 3155:PMID 2948:help 2844:and 2836:and 2758:and 2746:and 2727:and 2695:and 2491:and 2462:> 2420:and 2232:and 2228:and 2220:and 2212:and 2200:and 2180:and 2164:and 2152:and 2143:and 1996:and 1976:and 1956:The 1941:and 1907:and 1885:and 1853:and 1744:and 1713:! × 1701:and 1689:and 1674:and 1666:and 1654:and 1642:and 1623:and 1525:< 1492:and 1455:> 1390:> 1337:> 1290:> 1264:and 1240:> 1193:> 1134:> 1108:and 1078:> 887:), ( 875:and 863:and 851:and 789:and 725:and 717:and 657:and 609:), ( 565:and 541:), ( 529:and 513:and 451:base 359:and 330:and 236:and 190:help 90:and 58:and 19:The 4380:doi 4355:doi 4332:hdl 4324:doi 4288:doi 4250:doi 4238:103 4200:doi 4172:doi 4151:doi 4130:doi 4101:doi 4072:doi 4039:doi 4009:doi 3988:doi 3967:doi 3946:doi 3906:doi 3868:hdl 3860:doi 3803:doi 3774:doi 3732:doi 3685:doi 3655:doi 3634:doi 3605:doi 3577:doi 3520:doi 3487:doi 3462:doi 3408:doi 3367:doi 3336:hdl 3328:doi 3290:doi 3243:doi 3205:doi 3176:doi 3147:doi 3133:115 3116:doi 3013:). 2933:). 2876:). 2856:or 2389:If 2236:in 2224:in 2110:or 1980:in 1953:). 1748:of 1705:of 1682:). 793:of 753:in 733:, ( 729:in 721:in 693:in 673:, ( 669:in 661:in 485:or 355:In 264:). 74:or 51:). 27:or 4433:: 4376:59 4374:. 4370:. 4351:37 4349:. 4330:. 4318:. 4314:. 4294:. 4284:34 4282:. 4256:. 4248:. 4236:. 4215:. 4196:49 4194:. 4190:. 4166:. 4147:46 4145:. 4124:. 4107:. 4097:64 4095:. 4078:. 4066:. 4062:. 4045:. 4035:62 4033:. 4005:32 4003:. 3984:38 3982:. 3963:15 3961:. 3944:. 3930:. 3902:55 3900:. 3896:. 3876:. 3866:. 3856:25 3854:. 3850:. 3826:. 3809:. 3799:64 3797:. 3780:. 3770:18 3768:. 3747:. 3728:78 3726:. 3691:. 3681:18 3679:. 3649:. 3630:43 3628:. 3611:. 3601:28 3599:. 3573:49 3571:. 3567:. 3543:. 3526:. 3518:. 3506:47 3504:. 3483:53 3481:. 3477:. 3458:10 3456:. 3431:. 3414:. 3404:40 3402:. 3392:53 3390:. 3373:. 3363:53 3361:. 3344:. 3334:. 3322:. 3296:. 3288:. 3278:45 3276:. 3239:53 3237:. 3211:. 3199:. 3182:. 3172:42 3170:. 3153:. 3145:. 3131:. 3112:12 3110:. 3059:, 3051:, 2872:; 2240:: 2196:, 2004:: 1988:≠ 1918:= 1903:, 1899:, 1861:; 1845:= 1837:= 1721:= 1040:, 1032:, 1024:, 1016:, 1008:, 1000:, 992:, 984:, 959:. 947:, 939:, 931:, 923:, 915:, 907:, 899:, 891:, 883:, 859:, 824:, 816:, 801:. 777:, 769:, 761:, 745:, 737:, 709:, 701:, 685:, 677:, 641:). 637:, 629:, 621:, 613:, 605:, 597:, 561:, 553:, 545:, 537:, 509:, 493:, 280:; 272:; 213:, 194:. 138:; 134:; 130:; 126:; 122:; 86:, 70:, 4386:. 4382:: 4361:. 4357:: 4340:. 4334:: 4326:: 4320:4 4302:. 4290:: 4273:. 4264:. 4252:: 4244:: 4227:. 4217:7 4206:. 4202:: 4178:. 4174:: 4168:5 4157:. 4153:: 4136:. 4132:: 4126:1 4115:. 4103:: 4086:. 4074:: 4068:3 4053:. 4041:: 4015:. 4011:: 3994:. 3990:: 3973:. 3969:: 3952:. 3948:: 3932:1 3912:. 3908:: 3884:. 3870:: 3862:: 3838:. 3828:8 3817:. 3805:: 3788:. 3776:: 3759:. 3749:7 3738:. 3734:: 3699:. 3687:: 3661:. 3657:: 3651:1 3640:. 3636:: 3619:. 3607:: 3579:: 3555:. 3545:2 3534:. 3522:: 3495:. 3489:: 3468:. 3464:: 3443:. 3433:9 3422:. 3410:: 3381:. 3369:: 3352:. 3338:: 3330:: 3324:9 3304:. 3292:: 3284:: 3249:. 3245:: 3219:. 3207:: 3201:3 3190:. 3178:: 3161:. 3149:: 3122:. 3118:: 3095:) 3089:( 3084:) 3080:( 3066:. 2995:X 2991:A 2987:P 2980:P 2976:A 2972:X 2950:) 2944:) 2936:( 2858:X 2854:A 2850:P 2846:X 2842:A 2838:X 2834:A 2830:P 2826:X 2822:A 2818:P 2811:X 2807:A 2803:P 2799:X 2795:A 2791:X 2787:A 2783:P 2779:X 2775:A 2771:P 2760:X 2756:A 2752:P 2748:X 2744:A 2729:X 2725:A 2708:X 2677:X 2669:, 2664:A 2656:, 2648:A 2619:. 2614:X 2606:+ 2601:X 2590:= 2582:X 2567:A 2559:+ 2554:A 2543:= 2535:A 2504:X 2476:A 2468:, 2465:0 2433:X 2402:A 2374:. 2371:) 2368:y 2365:( 2360:X 2352:+ 2349:) 2346:b 2343:( 2338:A 2327:) 2324:x 2321:( 2316:X 2308:+ 2305:) 2302:a 2299:( 2294:A 2281:) 2278:y 2275:, 2272:b 2269:( 2263:) 2260:x 2257:, 2254:a 2251:( 2238:X 2234:y 2230:x 2226:A 2222:b 2218:a 2214:X 2210:A 2202:X 2198:A 2194:P 2185:( 2182:X 2178:A 2166:X 2162:A 2154:X 2150:A 2145:X 2141:A 2119:( 2112:X 2108:A 2104:P 2097:P 2093:A 2089:y 2085:x 2068:. 2065:) 2062:y 2059:, 2054:1 2051:+ 2048:i 2044:a 2040:( 2037:= 2034:) 2031:x 2028:, 2023:i 2019:a 2015:( 2002:I 1998:i 1994:i 1990:y 1986:x 1982:X 1978:y 1974:x 1966:A 1962:I 1949:( 1943:X 1939:A 1935:X 1931:A 1927:P 1923:y 1920:b 1916:x 1913:a 1909:y 1905:x 1901:b 1897:a 1855:X 1851:A 1847:m 1843:n 1839:m 1835:n 1817:) 1812:3 1809:m 1804:( 1777:) 1772:3 1769:n 1764:( 1750:X 1746:m 1742:A 1738:n 1723:m 1719:n 1715:m 1711:n 1707:X 1703:m 1699:A 1695:n 1691:X 1687:A 1678:( 1676:X 1672:A 1668:X 1664:A 1660:P 1656:X 1652:A 1648:P 1644:X 1640:A 1632:P 1625:X 1621:A 1600:, 1597:) 1594:x 1591:, 1588:c 1585:( 1582:= 1579:) 1576:z 1573:, 1570:a 1567:( 1543:, 1540:) 1537:x 1534:, 1531:c 1528:( 1522:) 1519:z 1516:, 1513:a 1510:( 1494:X 1490:A 1473:. 1470:) 1467:x 1464:, 1461:c 1458:( 1452:) 1449:z 1446:, 1443:a 1440:( 1414:. 1411:y 1408:+ 1405:c 1402:+ 1399:x 1396:+ 1393:b 1387:z 1384:+ 1381:b 1378:+ 1375:y 1372:+ 1369:a 1346:y 1343:+ 1340:c 1334:z 1331:+ 1328:b 1305:) 1302:y 1299:, 1296:c 1293:( 1287:) 1284:z 1281:, 1278:b 1275:( 1252:; 1249:x 1246:+ 1243:b 1237:y 1234:+ 1231:a 1208:) 1205:x 1202:, 1199:b 1196:( 1190:) 1187:y 1184:, 1181:a 1178:( 1152:. 1149:) 1146:y 1143:, 1140:c 1137:( 1131:) 1128:z 1125:, 1122:b 1119:( 1093:) 1090:x 1087:, 1084:b 1081:( 1075:) 1072:y 1069:, 1066:a 1063:( 1049:P 1042:x 1038:b 1034:y 1030:a 1026:y 1022:a 1018:x 1014:b 1010:x 1006:b 1002:y 998:a 994:y 990:b 986:x 982:a 978:P 957:P 949:y 945:b 941:x 937:a 933:y 929:b 925:x 921:b 917:x 913:b 909:x 905:a 901:y 897:b 893:x 889:b 885:x 881:a 877:X 873:A 869:P 865:P 861:X 857:A 853:X 849:A 834:y 830:x 826:y 822:a 818:x 814:a 810:a 806:P 799:A 795:X 791:y 787:x 783:X 779:b 775:a 771:y 767:d 763:x 759:d 755:A 751:d 747:y 743:a 739:x 735:a 731:A 727:a 723:X 719:y 715:x 711:w 707:b 703:w 699:a 695:X 691:w 687:x 683:b 679:x 675:a 671:X 667:x 663:A 659:b 655:a 647:P 639:z 635:b 631:z 627:a 623:y 619:b 615:y 611:a 607:x 603:b 599:x 595:a 591:b 587:a 571:P 567:P 563:X 559:A 555:z 551:c 547:y 543:b 539:x 535:a 531:X 527:A 523:P 519:X 515:z 511:y 507:x 503:A 499:c 495:b 491:a 487:X 483:A 479:X 475:A 428:r 424:Q 407:] 404:Q 401:[ 395:r 392:= 389:Q 268:( 250:n 192:) 186:) 92:X 88:A 84:P 80:P 76:P 72:X 68:A 64:P 60:X 56:A 47:(

Index

quantity
Gérard Debreu
R. Duncan Luce
John Tukey
Luce & Tukey 1964
concatenation
real number
Cliff 1992
Perline, Wright & Wainer 1979
Rasch model
Brogden 1977
Embretson & Reise 2000
Fischer 1995
Keats 1967
Kline 1998
Scheiblechner 1999
conjoint analysis
marketing
British Association for the Advancement of Science
Norman Robert Campbell
Stanley Smith Stevens
Michell 1999
help
Otto Hölder
topological
Luce & Suppes 2002
Luce & Tukey 1964
Dana Scott
axioms
Krantz 1968

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.