Knowledge (XXG)

Threat and error management

Source πŸ“

101:. Flight crew training stressed the importance of operational procedures and technical knowledge, with less emphasis placed on nontechnical skills, which became isolated from the real-world operational contexts. Safety training, including TEM, is important because a crew's nontechnical (safety) knowledge helps more in managing errors effectively than crews' familiarization with operations through experience. Candidates who are shortlisted during selection and training processes must demonstrate analytical and coordination capabilities. Possessing these nontechnical skills allows pilots and crew members to carry out their duties efficiently and effectively. 77:(RPT) airlines. However, an evaluation method was needed to identify threats and errors during flight operations and to add information to existing TEM data. A Line Operations Safety Audit (LOSA) serves this purpose and involves the identification and collection of safety-related information — on crew performance, environmental conditions, and operational complexity — by a highly trained observer. LOSA data is used to assess the effectiveness of an organization's training program and to find out how trained procedures are being implemented in day-to-day flights. 122:
she was not able to detect an error or threat after a flight. The pilot's responsibilities include his or her opinions on what safety issues could have had an adverse impact on their operations. A LOSA trainee must then record the specific responses of the pilot and thereafter code performance using behavioral markers. The order of the recording is as follows: a) record visible threats; b) identify error types, crew's responses, and specific outcomes; and c) use
31: 50:) is an overarching safety management approach that assumes that pilots will naturally make mistakes and encounter risky situations during flight operations. Rather than try to avoid these threats and errors, its primary focus is on teaching pilots to manage these issues so they do not impair safety. Its goal is to maintain safety margins by training 299:
can use to identify active and latent threats to flight operations. It is a guideline that communicates in detail what is an imminent threat to current operations or who is causing the threat. In the past, SCP data were based on investigation of accidents or incidents, experiences, and intuitions but
121:
experts includes two sessions: education in procedural protocols, and TEM concepts and classifications. A LOSA trainee is taught to find data first and then code them later for both sessions, during which a crew member must exhibit "LOSA Etiquette" — ability to notify the pilot as to why he or
493:
An unnamed airline conducted base-line observations from 1996 to 1998 using the defined SCP and LOSA data to improve its organization's safety culture and the results were positive. The crew error-trapping rate was significantly increased to 55%, meaning that crews were able to detect about 55% of
285:
are aircraft configurations or circumstances that are caused either by human error or by external factors. The management of unintended states is vital since they can result in serious aircraft accidents. For example, navigation problems on the cockpit display may lead a pilot to make an incorrect
61:
TEM allows crews to measure the complexities of a specific organization's context — meaning that the threats and errors encountered by pilots will vary depending upon the type of flight operation — and record human performance in that context. TEM also considers technical (e.g.
279:(intentional or unintentional). Although crew members are encouraged not to be afraid of admitting their mistakes, they must be able to criticize themselves since the learning process helps them understand the potential danger presented other crew members. 906:
Leva, M.C.; et al. (August 2008). "The advancement of a new human factors report – 'The Unique Report' – facilitating flight crew auditing of performance/operations as part of an airline's safety management system".
89:
pilots that can effectively manage in-flight challenges. Many strategies have been developed (e.g. training, teamwork, reallocating workload) that were focused on improving on
58:
to detect and respond to events that are likely to cause damage (threats) as well as mistakes that are most likely to be made (errors) during flight operations.
719:"Operational Fidelity in Simulation-Based Training: The Use of Data from Threat and Error Management Analysis in Instructional Systems Design" 24: 133:: 1) poor, 2) marginal, 3) good, and 4) outstanding. The data are then quantified and tabulated as exemplified by the following format: 700:"Line Operations Safety Audit (LOSA) for the management of safety in single pilot operations (LOSA:SP) in Australia and New Zealand" 651:"Predictors of Threat and Error Management: Identification of Core Nontechnical Skills and Implications for Training Systems Design" 494:
the errors they caused. A 40% reduction in errors related to checklist performance and a 62% reduction in unstabilized approaches (
506:, etc.) were observed. A proper review and management of SCP and LOSA data can prevent further disasters in flight operations. 499: 718: 276: 74: 20: 86: 622: 771: 275:
Errors include procedural errors (mistakes or inadequacy of attention towards a task at hand), and violation of
998: 993: 525: 520: 123: 63: 300:
nowadays SCP focuses more on the precursors to accidents. There are several steps involved in conducting SCP:
515: 540: 90: 600:
Coordinator, Flight Safety and Human Factors Programme - ICAO. Canadian Aviation Safety Seminar (CASS)
70: 51: 932: 670: 118: 924: 835: 916: 879: 871: 825: 817: 752: 662: 535: 503: 94: 772:"Crew Familiarity: Operational Experience, NonTechnical Performance, and Error Management" 39: 286:
decisions, potentially causing injuries or fatality to passengers and crew members alike.
756: 987: 959: 859: 830: 805: 650: 565: 936: 699: 674: 592: 130: 860:"Developing a Single-Pilot Line Operations Safety Audit: An Aviation Pilot Study" 875: 666: 530: 98: 858:
Earl, Laurie; Bates, Paul; Murray, Patrick; Glendon, Ian; Creed, Peter (2012).
806:"Error, Stress, and Teamwork in Medicine and Aviation: Cross Sectional Surveys" 747:
Martin, Wayne L. (2019). "Crew Resource Management and Individual Resilience".
295:
Safety change process (SCP), which is part of LOSA, is a formal mechanism that
30: 920: 495: 821: 928: 839: 296: 259:
Frequency is the total number of threats that occurred and is denoted by
109:
The following components are methods that help provide data for the TEM.
884: 85:
Threat and error management is an important element in the training of
62:
mechanical) and environmental issues, and incorporates strategies from
55: 129:
Observers will finally record a pilot's overall response on a 4-point
704:
Aeronautica (Griffith University Aerospace Strategic Study Centre)
29: 804:
Sexton, J. Bryan; Thomas, Eric; Helmreich, Robert (March 2000).
271:
LOSA identifies three main categories that must be recorded:
623:"Threat & Error Management (TEM) SafeSkies Presentation" 69:
The TEM framework was developed in 1994 by psychologists at
73:
based on the investigation of accidents of high capacity
566:"From Threat and Error Management (TEM) to Resilience" 698:Earl, Laurie; Murray, Patrick; Bates, Paul (2011). 726:Proceedings of SimTecT2003: Simulation Conference 655:The International Journal of Aviation Psychology 66:to teach pilots to manage threats and errors. 864:Aviation Psychology and Applied Human Factors 770:Thomas, Matthew; Petrilli, Renee (Jan 2006). 570:Journal of Human Factors and Aerospace Safety 564:Dekker, Sidney; LundstrΓΆm, Johan (May 2007). 8: 779:Aviation, Space, and Environmental Medicine 328:2. Conduct detailed analysis of Risks/data 302: 883: 829: 644: 642: 559: 557: 555: 194: 140: 954: 952: 950: 948: 946: 853: 851: 849: 551: 189:Good management of threats and errors. 323:1. Collect safety issues (LOSA expert) 960:"Line Operations Safety Audit (LOSA)" 477: 474: 469: 464: 462: 460: 458: 456: 450: 448: 442: 440: 438: 436: 434: 432: 430: 424: 422: 420: 418: 416: 410: 408: 405: 403: 398: 396: 393: 391: 389: 387: 385: 379: 377: 371: 369: 367: 365: 363: 361: 359: 353: 351: 349: 347: 345: 335: 332: 327: 322: 320: 318: 316: 314: 178:Thorough understanding of procedures 137:Planning and execution of performance 25:Threat management (computer security) 7: 693: 691: 593:"Threat and Error Management (TEM)" 757:10.1016/b978-0-12-812995-1.00007-5 333:3. Identify improvement strategies 306:Safety Change Process (SCP) model 14: 126:behavioral markers to rate crew. 34:Threat and error management model 465:7. Observe the impact of changes 164:Situational awareness maintained 175:Carried out necessary briefings 751:. Elsevier. pp. 207–226. 591:Maurino, Dan (18 April 2005). 500:controlled flight into terrain 470:6. Apply changes to operations 1: 21:Error management (psychology) 969:(First Edition): 25–29. 2002 230:Airline Operational Pressure 667:10.1207/s15327108ijap1402_6 44:threat and error management 1015: 161:Active monitoring of crews 18: 16:Safety management approach 921:10.1080/00140130903437131 876:10.1027/2192-0923/a000027 483: 481: 472: 467: 446: 444: 428: 426: 375: 373: 357: 355: 341: 339: 330: 325: 283:Undesired Aircraft States 166: 113:LOSA observation training 822:10.1136/bmj.320.7237.745 749:Crew Resource Management 717:Thomas, Matthew (2003). 649:Thomas, Matthew (2004). 526:Crew Resource Management 75:Regular Public Transport 64:Crew Resource Management 19:Not to be confused with 810:British Medical Journal 516:Accident Classification 541:The curse of expertise 267:Categories of the LOSA 186:Communicate strategies 183:Contingency Management 35: 475:5. Funding of changes 400:Safety Change Process 394:8. Revise any changes 291:Safety change process 33: 216:Air Traffic Control 158:Monitor cross-check 71:University of Texas 198:Identified Threats 36: 816:(7273): 745–749. 504:runway excursions 491: 490: 487: 486: 257: 256: 193: 192: 105:Components of TEM 81:Importance of TEM 1006: 979: 978: 976: 974: 964: 956: 941: 940: 903: 897: 896: 894: 892: 887: 855: 844: 843: 833: 801: 795: 794: 792: 790: 776: 767: 761: 760: 744: 738: 737: 735: 733: 723: 714: 708: 707: 695: 686: 685: 683: 681: 646: 637: 636: 634: 632: 627: 618: 612: 611: 609: 607: 597: 588: 582: 581: 579: 577: 561: 536:Error Management 406:4. Risk Analysis 312: 311: 303: 195: 147:Task Description 141: 1014: 1013: 1009: 1008: 1007: 1005: 1004: 1003: 999:Safety analysis 994:Aviation safety 984: 983: 982: 972: 970: 962: 958: 957: 944: 905: 904: 900: 890: 888: 857: 856: 847: 803: 802: 798: 788: 786: 774: 769: 768: 764: 746: 745: 741: 731: 729: 721: 716: 715: 711: 697: 696: 689: 679: 677: 648: 647: 640: 630: 628: 625: 620: 619: 615: 605: 603: 595: 590: 589: 585: 575: 573: 563: 562: 553: 549: 521:Aviation safety 512: 293: 269: 115: 107: 83: 40:aviation safety 28: 17: 12: 11: 5: 1012: 1010: 1002: 1001: 996: 986: 985: 981: 980: 942: 915:(2): 164–183. 898: 845: 796: 762: 739: 709: 687: 661:(2): 207–231. 638: 613: 583: 550: 548: 545: 544: 543: 538: 533: 528: 523: 518: 511: 508: 489: 488: 485: 484: 482: 479: 478: 476: 473: 471: 468: 466: 463: 461: 459: 457: 454: 452: 451: 449: 447: 445: 443: 441: 439: 437: 435: 433: 431: 429: 427: 425: 423: 421: 419: 417: 414: 412: 411: 409: 407: 404: 402: 397: 395: 392: 390: 388: 386: 383: 381: 380: 378: 376: 374: 372: 370: 368: 366: 364: 362: 360: 358: 356: 354: 352: 350: 348: 346: 343: 342: 340: 337: 336: 334: 331: 329: 326: 324: 321: 319: 317: 315: 308: 307: 292: 289: 288: 287: 280: 268: 265: 255: 254: 251: 248: 245: 241: 240: 237: 234: 231: 227: 226: 223: 220: 217: 213: 212: 205: 202: 199: 191: 190: 187: 184: 180: 179: 176: 173: 169: 168: 165: 162: 159: 155: 154: 151: 148: 145: 114: 111: 106: 103: 82: 79: 15: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 1011: 1000: 997: 995: 992: 991: 989: 968: 961: 955: 953: 951: 949: 947: 943: 938: 934: 930: 926: 922: 918: 914: 910: 902: 899: 886: 881: 877: 873: 869: 865: 861: 854: 852: 850: 846: 841: 837: 832: 827: 823: 819: 815: 811: 807: 800: 797: 784: 780: 773: 766: 763: 758: 754: 750: 743: 740: 727: 720: 713: 710: 705: 701: 694: 692: 688: 676: 672: 668: 664: 660: 656: 652: 645: 643: 639: 624: 617: 614: 601: 594: 587: 584: 571: 567: 560: 558: 556: 552: 546: 542: 539: 537: 534: 532: 529: 527: 524: 522: 519: 517: 514: 513: 509: 507: 505: 501: 497: 480: 455: 453: 415: 413: 401: 384: 382: 344: 338: 313: 310: 309: 305: 304: 301: 298: 290: 284: 281: 278: 274: 273: 272: 266: 264: 262: 252: 249: 246: 243: 242: 238: 235: 232: 229: 228: 224: 221: 218: 215: 214: 210: 206: 203: 200: 197: 196: 188: 185: 182: 181: 177: 174: 171: 170: 163: 160: 157: 156: 152: 149: 146: 143: 142: 139: 138: 134: 132: 127: 125: 120: 117:Training for 112: 110: 104: 102: 100: 96: 92: 88: 80: 78: 76: 72: 67: 65: 59: 57: 53: 49: 45: 41: 32: 26: 22: 971:. Retrieved 967:ICAO Journal 966: 912: 908: 901: 889:. Retrieved 867: 863: 813: 809: 799: 787:. Retrieved 782: 778: 765: 748: 742: 730:. Retrieved 725: 712: 703: 678:. Retrieved 658: 654: 629:. Retrieved 621:Banks, Ian. 616: 604:. Retrieved 599: 586: 574:. Retrieved 569: 492: 399: 294: 282: 270: 260: 258: 208: 207:*Frequency ( 172:SOP briefing 167:Outstanding 136: 135: 131:Likert scale 128: 116: 108: 84: 68: 60: 56:flight crews 47: 43: 37: 973:18 November 885:10072/49214 531:Pilot Error 496:tailstrikes 988:Categories 909:Ergonomics 891:24 October 789:25 October 732:19 October 680:24 October 631:19 October 547:References 204:Mismanaged 870:: 49–61. 606:6 October 576:6 October 87:competent 937:32462406 929:20099172 840:10720356 675:15271960 510:See also 297:airlines 150:Comments 706:(1): 2. 244:Weather 201:Managed 153:Rating 95:fatigue 935:  927:  838:  828:  673:  97:, and 91:stress 52:pilots 963:(PDF) 933:S2CID 831:27316 775:(PDF) 722:(PDF) 671:S2CID 626:(PDF) 596:(PDF) 99:error 975:2015 925:PMID 893:2015 836:PMID 791:2015 734:2015 682:2015 633:2015 608:2015 578:2015 144:Task 119:LOSA 54:and 917:doi 880:hdl 872:doi 826:PMC 818:doi 814:320 785:(1) 753:doi 728:: 2 663:doi 602:: 1 572:: 1 277:SOP 253:12 225:19 124:CRM 48:TEM 38:In 23:or 990:: 965:. 945:^ 931:. 923:. 913:53 911:. 878:. 866:. 862:. 848:^ 834:. 824:. 812:. 808:. 783:77 781:. 777:. 724:. 702:. 690:^ 669:. 659:14 657:. 653:. 641:^ 598:. 568:. 554:^ 502:, 498:, 263:. 239:9 219:17 211:) 93:, 42:, 977:. 939:. 919:: 895:. 882:: 874:: 868:2 842:. 820:: 793:. 759:. 755:: 736:. 684:. 665:: 635:. 610:. 580:. 261:N 250:6 247:6 236:0 233:9 222:2 209:N 46:( 27:.

Index

Error management (psychology)
Threat management (computer security)

aviation safety
pilots
flight crews
Crew Resource Management
University of Texas
Regular Public Transport
competent
stress
fatigue
error
LOSA
CRM
Likert scale
SOP
airlines
tailstrikes
controlled flight into terrain
runway excursions
Accident Classification
Aviation safety
Crew Resource Management
Pilot Error
Error Management
The curse of expertise


Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

↑