Knowledge (XXG)

Torres v. Texas Department of Public Safety

Source 📝

31: 260:, and could not serve in the same position. He asked the Department for a similar position within the Highway Patrol but was denied any accommodation. Torres opted to resign and later sued the Department under USERRA. The Department argued that the state could not be sued under a federal law under the principle of 284:
states, in coming together to form a union, agreed to sacrifice their sovereign immunity for the good of the common defense." Breyer quoted examples from 1872 onward that demonstrate that "Congress may legislate at the expense of traditional state sovereignty to raise and support the Armed Forces."
283:
wrote the majority opinion, which held that while states have sovereign immunity, it does not extend to areas of the nation's defense, and thus the state could be held liable for failing to follow USERRA, allowing Torres' lawsuit to proceed. Breyer wrote "Text, history and precedent show that the
240:
was passed to assure that personnel in the U.S. military would be able to return to work at their former employer after deployment in the field. Should the person not be able to return to work in the same position, the employer must find a position "that provides similar status and pay". USERRA
295:
dissented. Thomas stated that "the 'history, practice, precedent and the structure of the Constitution' all demonstrate that states did not surrender their sovereign immunity in their own courts when Congress legislates pursuant to one of its war power". Thomas referred to the decision in
287:
Justice Kagan wrote a concurrence that stated that in regards to state sovereign immunity, "our sovereign immunity decisions have not followed a straight line", though agreed that forgoing sovereign immunity was necessary for supporting the war powers of the nation.
885: 778: 770: 237: 221: 203: 978: 306:
in that "the powers delegated to Congress under Article I of the United States Constitution do not include the power to subject nonconsenting States to private suits for damages in state courts".
680: 648: 909: 834: 459: 228:. In a 5–4 decision issued in June 2022, the Court ruled that state sovereign immunity does not prevent states from being sued under federal law related to the nation's defense. 79: 688: 536: 983: 704: 696: 330: 640: 424: 917: 973: 802: 794: 527: 672: 968: 261: 225: 762: 746: 241:
applies to all employers within the United States. The law was passed to prevent employers from discriminating based on military service.
656: 818: 560: 35: 893: 249: 730: 279:
On June 29, 2022, the court reversed the Texas court of appeals in a 5–4 vote and remanded the case for further review. Justice
738: 941: 393: 664: 520: 217: 600: 754: 309:
The majority opinion in this case was the last opinion written by Justice Breyer before his retirement on June 30.
253: 365: 901: 552: 933: 877: 513: 264:. Both a Texas trial court and court of appeals agreed with the state's position, dismissing Torres' suit. The 265: 63: 861: 463: 74: 616: 869: 853: 624: 245: 835:
Financial Oversight and Management Board for Puerto Rico v. Centro de Periodismo Investigativo, Inc.
335: 276:
The Supreme Court granted certiorari in December 2021, and heard oral arguments on March 29, 2022.
497: 398: 370: 925: 608: 576: 568: 488: 160: 505: 425:"Divided court allows veteran to sue state-agency employer for violating his federal rights" 810: 584: 470: 292: 152: 136: 116: 331:"Supreme Court to hear Army reservist's discrimination claim involving burn pit exposure" 786: 632: 592: 298: 280: 124: 962: 148: 128: 108: 302:
which found that private citizens could not sue states under federal law, quoting
252:, when he was called to deploy in Iraq in 2007 as part of his enlistment in the 244:
Le Roy Torres, the petitioner in the case, had been working as a trooper in the
140: 429: 886:
Florida Prepaid Postsecondary Education Expense Board v. College Savings Bank
779:
College Savings Bank v. Florida Prepaid Postsecondary Education Expense Board
771:
Florida Prepaid Postsecondary Education Expense Board v. College Savings Bank
479: 394:"Supreme Court, in Case on Veteran Hurt by Burn Pits, Debates War Powers" 257: 256:. When he returned, he had suffered lung damage from smoke inhalation at 91: 795:
Federal Maritime Commission v. South Carolina State Ports Authority
238:
Uniformed Services Employment and Re-employment Rights Act of 1994
222:
Uniformed Services Employment and Re-employment Rights Act of 1994
204:
Uniformed Services Employment and Re-employment Rights Act of 1994
509: 30: 366:"Supreme Court Sides With Veteran Hurt by Burn Pits in Iraq" 681:
Lapides v. Board of Regents of University System of Georgia
649:
County of Oneida v. Oneida Indian Nation of New York State
910:
Board of Trustees of the University of Alabama v. Garrett
979:
United States Supreme Court cases of the Roberts Court
177:
Breyer, joined by Roberts, Sotomayor, Kagan, Kavanaugh
689:
Northern Insurance Co. of New York v. Chatham County
845: 722: 715: 657:
Welch v. Texas Dept. of Highways and Public Transp.
544: 197: 189: 181: 173: 168: 97: 87: 69: 59: 49: 42: 23: 359: 357: 355: 353: 54:Le Roy Torres v. Texas Department of Public Safety 641:Pennhurst State School and Hospital v. Halderman 705:Franchise Tax Board of California v. Hyatt III 918:Nevada Department of Human Resources v. Hibbs 731:Parden v. Terminal R. Co. of Ala. Docks Dept. 697:Franchise Tax Board of California v. Hyatt II 521: 8: 418: 416: 827:Torres v. Texas Department of Public Safety 456:Torres v. Texas Department of Public Safety 213:Torres v. Texas Department of Public Safety 24:Torres v. Texas Department of Public Safety 803:Central Virginia Community College v. Katz 719: 528: 514: 506: 20: 984:United States Eleventh Amendment case law 739:Employees v. Missouri Public Health Dept. 193:Thomas, joined by Alito, Gorsuch, Barrett 324: 322: 942:Coleman v. Court of Appeals of Maryland 318: 665:Blatchford v. Native Village of Noatak 673:Idaho v. Coeur d'Alene Tribe of Idaho 18:2022 United States Supreme Court case 7: 763:Seminole Tribe of Florida v. Florida 747:Atascadero State Hospital v. Scanlon 329:Barnes, Robert (December 15, 2021). 819:PennEast Pipeline Co. v. New Jersey 561:Osborn v. Bank of the United States 36:Supreme Court of the United States 14: 974:United States Supreme Court cases 894:Kimel v. Florida Board of Regents 498:Supreme Court (preliminary print) 466:580 (2022) is available from: 423:Sherry, Suzzana (June 29, 2022). 250:Texas Department of Public Safety 537:United States Eleventh Amendment 29: 601:Murray v. Wilson Distilling Co. 392:Liptak, Adam (March 29, 2022). 969:2022 in United States case law 364:Liptak, Adam (June 29, 2022). 1: 755:Pennsylvania v. Union Gas Co. 216:, 597 U.S. 580 (2022), was a 489:Supreme Court (slip opinion) 218:United States Supreme Court 1000: 480:Oyez (oral argument audio) 902:United States v. Morrison 553:Hollingsworth v. Virginia 202: 102: 28: 934:United States v. Georgia 878:City of Boerne v. Flores 846:Under the 14th Amendment 262:state sovereign immunity 226:state sovereign immunity 248:, a division under the 266:Supreme Court of Texas 220:case dealing with the 862:Fitzpatrick v. Bitzer 45:Decided June 29, 2022 43:Argued March 29, 2022 854:Katzenbach v. Morgan 246:Texas Highway Patrol 336:The Washington Post 399:The New York Times 371:The New York Times 113:Associate Justices 956: 955: 952: 951: 926:Tennessee v. Lane 617:Scheuer v. Rhodes 609:Edelman v. Jordan 577:Hans v. Louisiana 569:Ex parte Madrazzo 209: 208: 161:Amy Coney Barrett 991: 870:Dellmuth v. Muth 720: 530: 523: 516: 507: 502: 496: 493: 487: 484: 478: 475: 469: 442: 441: 439: 437: 420: 411: 410: 408: 406: 389: 383: 382: 380: 378: 361: 348: 347: 345: 343: 326: 98:Court membership 33: 32: 21: 999: 998: 994: 993: 992: 990: 989: 988: 959: 958: 957: 948: 841: 811:Allen v. Cooper 723:Under Article I 711: 625:Quern v. Jordan 585:Giles v. Harris 540: 534: 500: 494: 491: 485: 482: 476: 473: 467: 451: 446: 445: 435: 433: 422: 421: 414: 404: 402: 391: 390: 386: 376: 374: 363: 362: 351: 341: 339: 328: 327: 320: 315: 293:Clarence Thomas 274: 268:denied review. 234: 153:Brett Kavanaugh 151: 139: 137:Sonia Sotomayor 127: 117:Clarence Thomas 44: 38: 19: 12: 11: 5: 997: 995: 987: 986: 981: 976: 971: 961: 960: 954: 953: 950: 949: 947: 946: 938: 930: 922: 914: 906: 898: 890: 882: 874: 866: 858: 849: 847: 843: 842: 840: 839: 831: 823: 815: 807: 799: 791: 787:Alden v. Maine 783: 775: 767: 759: 751: 743: 735: 726: 724: 717: 713: 712: 710: 709: 701: 693: 685: 677: 669: 661: 653: 645: 637: 633:Nevada v. Hall 629: 621: 613: 605: 597: 593:Ex parte Young 589: 581: 573: 565: 557: 548: 546: 542: 541: 535: 533: 532: 525: 518: 510: 504: 503: 450: 449:External links 447: 444: 443: 412: 384: 349: 317: 316: 314: 311: 299:Alden v. Maine 281:Stephen Breyer 273: 270: 233: 230: 207: 206: 200: 199: 195: 194: 191: 187: 186: 183: 179: 178: 175: 171: 170: 166: 165: 164: 163: 125:Stephen Breyer 114: 111: 106: 100: 99: 95: 94: 89: 85: 84: 71: 67: 66: 61: 57: 56: 51: 50:Full case name 47: 46: 40: 39: 34: 26: 25: 17: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 996: 985: 982: 980: 977: 975: 972: 970: 967: 966: 964: 944: 943: 939: 936: 935: 931: 928: 927: 923: 920: 919: 915: 912: 911: 907: 904: 903: 899: 896: 895: 891: 888: 887: 883: 880: 879: 875: 872: 871: 867: 864: 863: 859: 856: 855: 851: 850: 848: 844: 837: 836: 832: 829: 828: 824: 821: 820: 816: 813: 812: 808: 805: 804: 800: 797: 796: 792: 789: 788: 784: 781: 780: 776: 773: 772: 768: 765: 764: 760: 757: 756: 752: 749: 748: 744: 741: 740: 736: 733: 732: 728: 727: 725: 721: 718: 714: 707: 706: 702: 699: 698: 694: 691: 690: 686: 683: 682: 678: 675: 674: 670: 667: 666: 662: 659: 658: 654: 651: 650: 646: 643: 642: 638: 635: 634: 630: 627: 626: 622: 619: 618: 614: 611: 610: 606: 603: 602: 598: 595: 594: 590: 587: 586: 582: 579: 578: 574: 571: 570: 566: 563: 562: 558: 555: 554: 550: 549: 547: 543: 538: 531: 526: 524: 519: 517: 512: 511: 508: 499: 490: 481: 472: 465: 461: 457: 453: 452: 448: 432: 431: 426: 419: 417: 413: 401: 400: 395: 388: 385: 373: 372: 367: 360: 358: 356: 354: 350: 338: 337: 332: 325: 323: 319: 312: 310: 307: 305: 301: 300: 294: 289: 285: 282: 277: 272:Supreme Court 271: 269: 267: 263: 259: 255: 251: 247: 242: 239: 231: 229: 227: 224:(USERRA) and 223: 219: 215: 214: 205: 201: 196: 192: 188: 184: 180: 176: 172: 169:Case opinions 167: 162: 158: 154: 150: 146: 142: 138: 134: 130: 126: 122: 118: 115: 112: 110: 107: 105:Chief Justice 104: 103: 101: 96: 93: 92:Oral argument 90: 86: 82: 81: 76: 72: 68: 65: 62: 58: 55: 52: 48: 41: 37: 27: 22: 16: 940: 932: 924: 916: 908: 900: 892: 884: 876: 868: 860: 852: 833: 826: 825: 817: 809: 801: 793: 785: 777: 769: 761: 753: 745: 737: 729: 703: 695: 687: 679: 671: 663: 655: 647: 639: 631: 623: 615: 607: 599: 591: 583: 575: 567: 559: 551: 455: 434:. Retrieved 428: 403:. Retrieved 397: 387: 375:. Retrieved 369: 340:. Retrieved 334: 308: 303: 297: 290: 286: 278: 275: 254:Army Reserve 243: 235: 212: 211: 210: 198:Laws applied 156: 149:Neil Gorsuch 144: 132: 129:Samuel Alito 120: 109:John Roberts 78: 53: 15: 182:Concurrence 141:Elena Kagan 963:Categories 716:Abrogation 430:SCOTUSBlog 313:References 232:Background 60:Docket no. 258:burn pits 70:Citations 539:case law 454:Text of 436:June 30, 405:June 30, 377:June 30, 342:June 30, 291:Justice 174:Majority 88:Argument 545:General 190:Dissent 945:(2012) 937:(2006) 929:(2004) 921:(2003) 913:(2001) 905:(2000) 897:(2000) 889:(1999) 881:(1997) 873:(1989) 865:(1976) 857:(1966) 838:(2023) 830:(2022) 822:(2021) 814:(2020) 806:(2006) 798:(2002) 790:(1999) 782:(1999) 774:(1999) 766:(1996) 758:(1989) 750:(1985) 742:(1973) 734:(1964) 708:(2019) 700:(2016) 692:(2006) 684:(2002) 676:(1997) 668:(1991) 660:(1987) 652:(1985) 644:(1984) 636:(1979) 628:(1979) 620:(1974) 612:(1974) 604:(1909) 596:(1908) 588:(1903) 580:(1890) 572:(1833) 564:(1824) 556:(1798) 501:  495:  492:  486:  483:  477:  474:  471:Justia 468:  159: 157:· 155:  147: 145:· 143:  135: 133:· 131:  123: 121:· 119:  64:20-603 462: 304:Alden 185:Kagan 77:580 ( 464:U.S. 438:2022 407:2022 379:2022 344:2022 236:The 80:more 75:U.S. 73:597 460:597 965:: 458:, 427:. 415:^ 396:. 368:. 352:^ 333:. 321:^ 529:e 522:t 515:v 440:. 409:. 381:. 346:. 83:)

Index

Supreme Court of the United States
20-603
U.S.
more
Oral argument
John Roberts
Clarence Thomas
Stephen Breyer
Samuel Alito
Sonia Sotomayor
Elena Kagan
Neil Gorsuch
Brett Kavanaugh
Amy Coney Barrett
Uniformed Services Employment and Re-employment Rights Act of 1994
United States Supreme Court
Uniformed Services Employment and Re-employment Rights Act of 1994
state sovereign immunity
Uniformed Services Employment and Re-employment Rights Act of 1994
Texas Highway Patrol
Texas Department of Public Safety
Army Reserve
burn pits
state sovereign immunity
Supreme Court of Texas
Stephen Breyer
Clarence Thomas
Alden v. Maine

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.