2545:
the action to be penalised with a variety of sanctions. For example, Rule 11 of the
Federal Rules of Civil Procedure provide in part: "By presenting to the court a pleading, written motion, or other paper--whether by signing, filing, submitting, or later advocating it--an attorney or unrepresented party certifies that to the best of the person's knowledge, information, and belief, formed after an inquiry reasonable under the circumstances: . . . (2) the claims, defenses, and other legal contentions are warranted by existing law or by a non-frivolous argument for extending, modifying, or reversing existing law or for establishing new law; (3) the factual contentions have evidentiary support or, if specifically so identified, will likely have evidentiary support after a reasonable opportunity for further investigation or discovery." If the court decides that the plaintiff has violated this rule, it has wide discretion to sanction the offending party, the party's attorney or both, including the discretion to dismiss the plaintiff's claim or claims, order the plaintiff, the plaintiff's attorney or both to pay money, reprimand the attorney and/or refer the offending attorney to the applicable disciplinary authorities, among other things. Ethical rules also forbid attorneys from filing "frivolous" lawsuits. State courts and bar associations typically publish sanctions imposed on attorneys for violations of these rules. A simple review of these published opinions demonstrates that courts take violations of their pleading and ethical rules seriously.
1120:
other tort-based systems, such as automobile litigation or airplane crashes, that determine fault and compensate victims. Moreover, most patients that receive negligent care never receive any compensation. The
Harvard Medical Practice Study found that only one malpractice claim was filed for every eight negligent medical injuries." Of the legal changes proposed by tort reformers, this study found that states capping payouts and restricting non-economic damages saw an average decrease of 17.1% in malpractice insurance premiums. However, more recent research provided by the insurance industry to the publication Medical Liability Monitor indicated that medical malpractice insurance rates had declined for four straight years. The decrease was seen in both states that had enacted tort reform and in states that had not, leading actuaries familiar with the data to suggest that patient safety and risk management campaigns had had a more significant effect. Similarly, Klick/Stratman (2005) found that capping economic damages saw an increase in doctors per capita.
1692:
the basis that they ensure equal treatment of similarly situated victims, avoid the risk of conflicting judgments on similar issues, and allow an efficient resolution of a large number of claims. In the US, class actions have been used (and by some views abused) in order to overcome the differences applicable in different jurisdictions, including the perceived predispositions of judges, juries, and differences in substantive or procedural law. So if one claimant lives in State X, where courts and laws are unfavourable to their claim, but another claimant lives in the more favourable jurisdiction of State Y, they may bring a class action together in State Y. Strictly speaking, State Y must not adjudicate the claim unless it is found that the applicable law is similar or identical in both states, but as a practical matter this rule is often disregarded in favour of efficient resolution of claims. More broadly, addressing perceived
1112:
find that the greatest ten per cent of the malpractice payments have grown at a smaller pace than the average payment for the years 1991 and 2003. This means that the "medical malpractice crisis" is not necessarily fueled by the growth in malpractice payments. Furthermore, malpractice pressure actually forces our hospitals to be technically more efficient. This implies that existence of the medical malpractice system is beneficial, and its strength should not be diluted by either putting caps on non-economic damages or by decreasing the statute of limitations." Some say that federal licensing is a better approach and a strong central regulatory body is the answer to deal with negligent physicians who cross state lines.
1290:(1970). Originally his proposal was the gradual abolition of tort actions, and its replacement with schemes like those for industrial injuries to cover for all illness, disability and disease, whether caused by people or nature. Such a system was developed in New Zealand following recommendations from the Royal Commission in 1967 for 'no fault' compensation scheme (see The Woodhouse Report). Over the 1980s Atiyah's views shifted. He still argued that the tort system should be scrapped. But instead of relying on the state, he argued people should have to take out compulsory first party insurance, like that available for cars, and this model should be spread progressively.
2029:. Even in these limited areas of tort law, there have been growing concerns about the juries' role. In particular, the disparity between awards in defamation cases (which invariably concern celebrities, politicians and the rich) and awards for personal injuries has been growing. A potential cause for the unpredictability of juries in tort cases is that individual jurors, unlike professional judges, are unfamiliar both with the law and with daily exposure to tragic accidents in tort litigation. When confronted with their first case they are thus likelier to award punitively high damages in order to 'teach' tortfeasors that "tort does not pay".
1372:. For example, one can make information requests that are potentially expensive and time-consuming for the other side to fulfill; respond to a discovery request with thousands of documents of questionable relevance to the case; file requests for protective orders to prevent the deposition of key witnesses; and take other measures that increase the difficulty and cost of discovery. It has been argued that although the goal of discovery is to level the playing field between the parties, the discovery rules instead create a
1994:
1743:(i.e. the principle that a respondent in a tort action cannot use the fact that a plaintiff has already been compensated as evidence) is another common proposal of tort reform advocates in jurisdictions where the rule exists. They argue that if the plaintiff's injuries and damages have already been compensated, it is unfair and duplicative to allow an award of damages against the respondent. As a result, numerous states have altered or partially abrogated the rule by
1626:
to be more at fault than the respondent. As a tort reform measure aimed at combatting the perceived unfairness of allowing a party to seek extra-contractual damages where they are primarily at fault, many common law jurisdictions have adopted a "modified" doctrine of comparative negligence in which a party may only recover damages if it bears less than half the liability or if the other party bears more than half the liability. More radically, the
American states of
2170:
corporations will decide that the cost of changing a wrongful practice would be greater than the cost of continuing it, unless there is the chance that the cost of continuing will be made greater by a successful lawsuit. In this view, the prospect of paying a small damage award would have little or no effect in correcting the wrongdoing, and would essentially allow the corporation to continue an unsafe practice unless state or federal regulators interceded.
1736:, often replacing it with a rule of proportionate liability. Of the forty-six states that had a joint and several liability rule, thirty-three states have abolished or limited the rule. Opponents of tort reform contend that the elimination of the rule would under-compensate people who had the misfortune to be hurt by more than one person, if at least one of the defendants does not have the financial means to pay his or her share of proportionate liability.
2081:, a progressive think tank: "Although TTP's estimate is widely cited by journalists, politicians, and business lobbyists, it is impossible to know what the company is actually measuring in its calculation of tort costs, and impossible to verify its figures, because TTP will not share its data or its methodology, which it claims are 'proprietary.'" Tort reform supporters claim that the Towers Perrin numbers are underestimates in many ways.
2275:
that lost statistical significance when looked at more closely—that is, correlation with other state-specific factors wiped out apparent increases in mortality from joint and several liability reform but also wiped out apparent decreases in mortality from capping economic damages and restrictions on contingency fees. The only tort reform effect that proved robust was a negative effect of collateral source reform on black infant mortality.
1086:
provide that if a defendant relying on the truth of purportedly defamatory statement as an affirmative defence is only successful in proving the truth of part of the allegedly defamatory statement, the defence may still be available if the charges not proved do not materially injure the reputation of the plaintiff. Similarly, while is no corresponding provision in India, Indian courts treat this principle as persuasive precedent.
6801:
812:
33:
6815:
2200:(1) to avoid paying future damages, the creators of dangerous products or conditions may voluntarily make them safer; (2) where conduct is particularly egregious, courts may award punitive damages to deter that conduct in the future; (3) the process of gathering information prior to trial – called 'discovery' – can bring information to light that can be used by policy-makers to create new laws or regulations.
874:) or to reduce damages they can receive. Such changes are generally justified under the grounds that litigation is an inefficient means to compensate plaintiffs; that tort law permits frivolous or otherwise undesirable litigation to crowd the court system; or that the fear of litigation can serve to curtail innovation, raise the cost of consumer goods or insurance premiums for suppliers of services (e.g.
1124:
cents in 1998. Opponents of these liability-limiting measures contend that insurance premiums are only nominally reduced, if at all, in comparison to savings for insurance companies. Further, opponents claim that parties are still being injured at similar or higher rates, due to malpractice not being deterred by tort claims and the attraction of lower quality physicians to "tort reformed" states.
1930:
on allegations of "low-ball payments on claims." As a reaction, a state senator introduced legislation (Senate Bill 1628) to reform hailstorm litigation. The bill represented "an almost visceral fight between the insurance industry, Texans for
Lawsuit Reform and trial lawyers whose symbolic leader in storm-damage claims in Steve Mostyn of Houston." By 2014, there had been 2,000 lawsuits filed in
1780:
damage awards relative to actual damages. In the United States, tort reform is a contentious political issue. US tort reform advocates propose, among other things, procedural limits on the ability to file claims, and capping the awards of damages. Opponents of tort reform argue that reformers have misstated the existence of any real factual issue and criticise tort reform as disguised
1597:
the costs of litigation, would deter marginal lawsuits and tactical litigation, and would create proper incentives for litigation, and argue for reforms that would require compensation of winning defendants some or all the time. Certain proposed or implemented tort reforms adopt the
English rule if the respondent should prevail but retain the American rule otherwise (e.g. California's
2065:
be class actions with many more joined claims than the cases of decades ago. They also note that the choice of the 1992 start date is misleading, because the largest increase in the number of tort cases occurred between 1970 and 1992. They also argue that the use of the median, rather than the mean, is a misleading statistic for measuring the magnitude of the litigation problem.
1128:
filed with the court within 120 days of the filing of the case. Failure to do so results in liability for the defendant's legal fees. Filing an action but failing to find a suitable expert or failure to file adequate reports within the time frame provided can result in hardship for a plaintiff who may already be crippled by physical injuries and bankrupted by medical fees.
1721:
achieved more fairly and with greater efficiency under the existing civil justice system. In addition, experts have suggested that health courts would be inevitably biased towards physicians, and that the bureaucracy needed to introduce safeguards against such bias would negate any cost savings. Still, a number of groups and individuals have supported this proposal.
1535:. While tort compensation can often be accurately calculated for property damage, such as where damages are in the amount of repair or replacement value, it is difficult to quantify the injuries to a person's body and mind. There is no market for severed legs or sanity of mind, and so there is no price which a court can readily apply in compensation for the wrong.
2347:-related bankruptcies (by, for example, limiting compensation for non-economic damages to the victims or their survivors, or by denying awards of punitive damages), the effect on overall employment and the national unemployment rate in an economy with more than 130 million payroll jobs would have been imperceptible (a change of less than two-thousandths of 1%).
2343:) examined the economic impacts of the tort system in somewhat greater depth. But that paper, too, failed to demonstrate any employment effects of the tort system and made no prediction about the impact of tort law change. Even if we assume that asbestos liability legislation could somehow have prevented the loss of 2,500 jobs per year resulting from
1241:. Proponents of tort reform argue that the success of that system in guaranteeing compensation where the tort system would not is an indication that tort law is inefficient at securing compensation for victims. By contrast, critics of tort reform are uncomfortable with the idea of abandoning personal liability for injuries as this could result in
1962:." Patrick said that storm litigation rates had risen dramatically, causing insurance companies to increase premiums and reduce coverage. The bill would still allow hailstorm insurance claimants to sue their insurance company. It would allow plaintiffs to sue for either deceptive trade practices or unfair settlement, but not both. According to
1107:
spending. Other recent research suggests that malpractice pressure makes hospitals more efficient, not less so: "The recent focus by the
American Medical Association and physicians about the dramatic increases in medical malpractice insurance premiums, and their suggestion of a cap on non-economic damages, deserves a closer look. According to
1314:. The difficulty in this area is to distinguish between public and private health care providers. In the UK, the cost was £1.6B a year as for 2014, increasing at 10%+ yearly Rising from £446m a year a decade earlier. The UK, however, has exceptionally low claims, as tort claims have been restricted, for instance in disallowing
1804:, where trial lawyers actively seek the magic combination of plaintiff, defendant, judge, and jury. Advocates of tort reform complain of unconstitutional regulation caused by litigation, and that litigation is used to circumvent the legislative process by achieving regulation that Congress is unwilling or unable to pass.
1666:
or failure; provided, however, that where the action is based upon the discovery of a foreign object in the body of the patient, the action may be commenced within one year of the date of such discovery or of the date of discovery of facts which would reasonably lead to such discovery, whichever is earlier....
1323:
The
American medical record in hospitals is poor, with around 195,000 deaths due to negligence per year, which itself leads to a higher number of claims. It is open to debate as to whether a change in the law of tort either way would lead to significant reductions in cost or changes in practice. According to
2017:(e.g. in India, Singapore, and most former British colonies in Africa) as an anachronistic institution that routinely introduced societal biases into the judicial process. Even in New Zealand and the United Kingdom, where juries are available in criminal cases, they are only permitted tort cases involving
1621:. Comparative negligence is a partial legal defence that reduces the amount of damages that a plaintiff can recover in a negligence-based claim based upon the degree to which the plaintiff's own negligence contributed to cause the injury, which progressively displaced the erstwhile traditional doctrine of
917:
failure to achieve one or more of these aims. In particular, the inefficiency of tort law at securing fair and equal compensation for similarly situated plaintiffs and the uncertainty, cost, and complexity it creates for economic actors averse to lawsuits are motivating factors for tort reform advocates.
2246:
However, design improvements to increase safety cannot be used against manufacturers in court to show that the product was unsafe. Rule 407 of the
Federal Rule of Evidence specifically states, "evidence of the subsequent measures is not admissible to prove: negligence; culpable conduct; a defect in a
1929:
wrote, "Windows were shattered. Hail knocked holes in rooftops. Unfortunate animals were beaten to death." Insurers paid out $ 556 million in claims to homeowners and $ 47 million to car owners. After the storms, thousands of lawsuits were filed against insurers and adjusters. The lawsuits were based
1691:
are lawsuits where counsel for one or more claimants bring claims on behalf of similarly situated claimants. While class actions originated and are most common in the United States and Canada, similar procedures are increasingly common in other common law jurisdictions. Class actions are justified on
1665:
An action for medical, dental or podiatric malpractice must be commenced within two years and six months of the act, omission or failure complained of or last treatment where there is continuous treatment for the same illness, injury or condition which gave rise to the said act, omission
1417:
argument for a change in the law. More broadly, the term is also used to describe tort lawsuits where there is only a remote link between the conduct of the defendant and the injuries alleged by the plaintiff or where the damages sought are perceived to be too high for the purported tortious conduct.
1224:
literature, there is consequently a debate as to whether liability and regulation are substitutes or complements and thus whether the enforcement of predictable regulation known to manufacturers in advance can adequately assure consumer safety while providing greater legal certainty for manufacturers
1123:
There is no guarantee, however, that any savings from tort reform would be efficiently distributed. Tort reform in Texas during the 1990s created $ 600 million in savings for insurance companies while the fraction of policy dollars needed to cover losses fell from 70.1 cents in losses in 1993 to 58.2
2274:
The effect of tort reform on medical outcomes has been studied with mixed results. A 2008 study found worse childbirth outcomes for mothers and infants in states with caps on non-economic damages. The Klick/Stratman paper cited above found several effects of specific tort reforms on infant mortality
2095:
In 1972, New
Zealand introduced the first universal no-fault insurance scheme for all accident victims, which provides benefit from the government-run Accident Compensation Corporation without respect to negligence. Its goal is to achieve equality of compensation, while reducing costs of litigation.
1799:
report indicates that U. S. tort costs were up slightly in 2007, are expected to significantly increase in 2008, and shows trends dating back as far as 1950. More recent research from the same source has found that tort costs as a percentage of GDP dropped between 2001 and 2009, and are now at their
1720:
would lead to more people being compensated, and to their receiving their money sooner. Critics of the health courts concept contend that it is ill-conceived, that it would be unfair to patients, that it would be unlikely to achieve its objectives, and that much of its goals as are reasonable can be
1625:
over the twentieth century which had precluded any damages being awarded in cases in which the plaintiff was deemed to be even partially at fault. Under standard or "pure" comparative negligence, a plaintiff can seek damages regardless of the portion of liability they bear, even where they are found
1564:
limited the situations in which punitive damages can be won in tort actions to where they are expressly authorised by a statute, where a defendant's action is calculated to make profit, or where an official of the state has acted arbitrarily, oppressively or unconstitutionally. In the United States,
1511:
A large portion of tort reforms seek to limit the damages a plaintiff can be awarded. The rationale underlying these reforms is that, by limiting the profitability of tort lawsuits to plaintiffs, they will reduce the incentive to file frivolous lawsuits. There are several varieties of reforms to the
1111:
and
Chandra (2004), increases in premiums are not affected by past or present malpractice payments, but may increase due to other unrelated factors. Chandra, Nundy, and Seabury (2005) find that the rising cost of medical services may explain the bulk of the growth of "compensatory awards". They also
2544:
For instance, in every American jurisdiction, if a defendant or the judge believes that a plaintiff has misrepresented the facts or the law or has brought a "frivolous" pleading, the defendant, or the court on its own initiative, may ask for the action to be thrown out and for the attorney bringing
2250:
It is true, however, that the evidence could be introduced to prove "ownership, control, or the feasibility of precautionary measures." But, a lawyer representing the manufacturer could concede ownership and control, and thus prevent the evidence from being introduced for that purpose. And a lawyer
2173:
Tort reform supporters argue that this precisely describes the problem: lawsuits over socially beneficial practices increase the costs of those practices, and thus improperly deter innovation and other economically desirable activity. They further suggest that small businesses are hurt worse by the
2076:
growth of 9% in estimated annual tort costs between 1951 and 2007 as opposed to a 7% average annual growth in GDP—representing 2.2% of GDP in 2004 vs. just 0.6% in 1950 and 1.3% in 1970. More recent research from the same source has found that tort costs as a per centage of GDP dropped between 2001
2064:
Tort reform advocates allege that these numbers are misleading. They claim that most liability costs come from pre-trial settlements, so the number of trials is irrelevant. Supporters further note that the number of "filings" is a misleading statistic, because modern filings are much more likely to
1596:
in a British court, they were ordered to pay the defendants' $ 1.75 million in attorneys' fees. The "American rule" differs; in most cases, each party bears its own expense of litigation. Supporters of tort reform argue that loser-pays rules are fairer, would compensate winners of lawsuits against
1352:
Proponents of tort reform also criticise the extent to which legal costs can approach or exceed the value of the compensation awarded in damages, especially in contrast with compensation allocated through insurance or social security systems. In Britain, for instance, it has been argued that 85p is
1322:
actively combats, and attempts to settle all cases where potential negligence claims are at stake. While successful, the costs of litigation to the health system are steadily growing. In the United States, it is easier for victims of medical malpractice to seek compensation through the tort system.
2319:
stated: "product liability is so extreme and uncertain as to retard innovation. The legal and regulatory climate places firms in constant jeopardy of costly and ... lengthy product suits. The existing approach goes beyond any reasonable need to protect consumers, as other nations have demonstrated
2195:
School of Public Health argued that tort litigation was an important tool for the prevention of injuries. While Teret acknowledged that the primary purpose of tort lawsuits usually is to recover money damages for the injured persons, as compensation for their medical and other costs, he identified
2182:
Proponents of the existing tort system contend that tort reform advocates exaggerate the costs and ignore the benefits of the current tort system. For example, consumer advocates and legal scholars contend that lawsuits encourage corporations to produce safer products, discourage them from selling
1855:
lawsuits with nationwide plaintiffs be tried in federal courts, eliminating awards for pre-judgment interest. Many of these measures tend to benefit defendants; others, such as the English rule, sanctions for delay, and early-offer settlement requirements, could have benefits to plaintiffs in some
1779:
each year are "frivolous" lawsuits. The term "frivolous lawsuit" has acquired a broader rhetorical definition in political debates about tort reform, where it is sometimes used by reform advocates to describe legally non-frivolous tort lawsuits that critics believe are without merit, or award high
1367:
An additional rationale for tort reform is the ability of plaintiff's attorneys to use the discovery process of common law jurisdictions to impose costs on defendants in order to force settlements in unmeritorious cases to avoid the cost and inconvenience of discovery. The use of discovery in tort
1301:
One argument focuses on the costs of litigation and how payment of compensation raises the cost of insurance. Because most tort claims will be paid from the pockets of insurance, and because the public generally pays into insurance schemes of all kinds, tort reform proponents assert that reducing
1106:
has been cited as a model for tort reform in health care. Others deny that medical malpractice suits play a significant role in the cost of health care. Including legal fees, insurance costs, and payouts, the cost of all US malpractice suits comes to less than one-half of 1 per cent of health-care
899:
jurisdictions, torts are primarily created through judicial precedent rather than legislation, and tort reform centers on proposals for legislation altering the precedent-based rules of tort law. Scholars and lawyers have identified conflicting aims for the law of tort, to some extent reflected in
2567:
supported the bill on the grounds that) the plaintiffs were trying to "sue out of existence" by forcing them to incur $ 250 million in legal defence expenses, while gun control supporters argued that the legislation took "away the right of victims to be able to have their day in court," that the
2241:
there is no evidence that expanded liability for design choices has been a significant cause of the passenger safety improvements witnessed since World War II. Graham concludes by endorsing reform, noting that case studies of the current product liability system "suggest that manufacturers may be
1557:
since the civil justice system in many countries does not accord defendants the procedural protections present in the criminal justice system thus penalising an individual without allowing them the ordinary procedural protections that are present in a criminal trial. The rationale for restricting
1538:
Some courts have developed scales of damages awards, benchmarks for compensation, which relate to the severity of the injury. For instance, in the United Kingdom, the loss of a thumb is compensated at £18,000, for an arm £72,000, for two arms £150,000, and so on. Even more difficult to reckon are
1340:
in most common law jurisdictions and the European Union. If a product is faulty, and injures somebody who has come across it (whether they are the buyer or not) then the manufacturer will be responsible for compensating the victim regardless of whether it can be shown that the manufacturer was at
1268:
One rationale for tort reform is the purported ineffectiveness of tort law in securing equal compensation. If someone has an accident then they have a statistical 8% chance of finding a tortfeasor responsible for their injury. If they are lucky enough to have been injured by someone else's fault,
1148:
In Indian tort law, the principle of absolute liability provides that "where an enterprise is engaged in a hazardous or inherently dangerous activity", the enterprise has an absolute and unrestricted obligation to provide compensation any harm caused in any way by the activity. Unlike the related
2232:
The case studies provide little evidence that expanded product liability risk was necessary to achieve the safety improvements that have been made. In the absence of liability risk, the combined effects of consumer demand, regulation, and professional responsibility would have been sufficient to
2212:
argued that tort reform actually saved tens of thousands of lives because "lower expected liability costs result in lower prices, enabling consumers to buy more risk-reducing products such as medicines, safety equipment, and medical services, and as consumers take additional precautions to avoid
1173:
are not recognised as a defence, is severely criticised especially since it disregards the "generally accepted parameter of minimum competence and reasonable care" and endangers the growth of science and technical industries, as investors have to take the risk of liability given that there is no
1127:
In Texas, tort reform measures have imposed a requirement in medical malpractice cases that only a physician practising or teaching in the same specialty as the defendant can serve as an expert witness in the matter. Additionally, a report from that witness showing evidence of negligence must be
1119:
According to a 2004 study of medical malpractice costs, "program administration—defence and underwriting costs—accounts for approximately 60 per cent of total malpractice costs, and only 50 per cent of total malpractice costs are returned to patients. These costs are high even when compared with
1724:
Another type of procedural reform is to modify the criteria related to a defendant's state of mind in order to increase the burden of proof imposed on the plaintiff. Tort reform in Texas changed the definition of negligence in the context of emergency room treatment to include only "willful and
1273:). For others—for those injured by natural accidents, by themselves, by disease or by environmental factors; no compensation is available, and the most that can be gained for their losses will be meager state benefits for incapacity. Equality of treatment is the central issue for reforms in the
1085:
Over the course of the twentieth and twenty first century, tort reform in the area of defamation law has resulted in an expansion of defences, including affirmative defences, available to defendants. For instance, the United Kingdom's Defamation Act 1952 and Singapore's Defamation Act 1957 both
916:
notes four possible bases on which different torts rested: appeasement, justice, deterrence and compensation. As a result of the wide range of rationales upon which the tort system is based and the variety of distinct purposes it aims to serve, criticism of tort law is generally targeted at its
2169:
and other restrictions on plaintiff's traditional rights will reduce corporate accountability. Because corporations typically engage in a cost-benefit analysis before considering whether to stop a wrongful action (such as polluting or not enacting proper measures for safety), they contend that
2013:. Many state constitutions have similar clauses to protect the right to a jury trial in state court proceedings. This is in stark contrast to continental Europe and the majority of Asian, African, and Latin American jurisdictions in which juries either never existed or were abolished following
1115:
According to economist Reed Neil Olsen, "...tort law generally and medical malpractice specifically serve two legitimate purposes. First, the law serves to compensate victims for their losses. Second, the threat of liability serves to deter future accidents." Tort reformers maintain that the
2269:
has had a negative influence on innovation. It has held back new designs, consumed resources that might otherwise have been directed at design improvement, and added on costs to the consumer. ... n Western European countries ... liability risks are low and the marketplace pays a premium for
1970:
in hail litigation, as reports of lawyers employing contractors and insurance adjusters to drum up clients have continued to surface the past several years." The bill would also prevent plaintiffs from suing their individual insurance agent. An identical bill (HB 1774) was introduced in the
1820:. Forty-two per cent of respondents reported that they had taken steps to restrict their practice in the previous 3 years, including eliminating procedures prone to complications, such as trauma surgery, and avoiding patients who had complex medical problems or were perceived as litigious.
1021:
has become a focus of tort reform. While similar reforms may be proposed for all these areas of tort law, the debate surrounding each tends to remain separate, with the debate surrounding purported abuse of the defamation tort system generally discussed separately by policymakers addressing
1446:
aims to address this issue by pausing all discovery between the time the motion is filed and the judge's ruling on the motion. Presently, most jurisdictions regard the prosecution of "frivolous" lawsuits as grounds for disciplinary proceedings against attorneys and potential ground for
1404:
Proponents of tort reform argue that the open-ended discovery process of common law jurisdictions enables plaintiffs arguing in bad faith to initiate frivolous tort lawsuits and coerce defendants into agreeing to legal settlements in otherwise unmeritorious actions. Strictly defined, a
1060:
until they abandon their criticism or opposition. As a result, many jurisdictions (especially in North America) have enacted legislation incorporating elements of common tort reform proposals specifically with regard to lawsuits brought against individuals purportedly exercising
2586:
For example, in 1999, a Los Angeles County jury awarded $ 4.8 billion in punitive damages against General Motors to a group of six burn victims whose 1979 Chevrolet Malibu was rear-ended by a drunk driver, causing it to catch fire. That was later reduced to $ 1.2 billion by the
2213:
accidents." They also concluded that "caps on noneconomic damages, a higher evidence standard for punitive damages, product liability reform, and prejudgment interest reform lead to fewer accidental deaths, while reforms to the collateral source rule lead to increased deaths."
1098:. This would reduce the number of unnecessary tests and procedures, typically performed under patient request, thereby reducing the costs of medical care in general. As an argument against the current system, tort reformers link the rising costs of premiums for physicians'
2251:
for the manufacturer could seek to prevent the introduction of the evidence to show feasibility of precautionary measures if he/she argued such evidence would violate Rule 403 of the Federal Rules of evidence. Rule 403 bars evidence that is relevant, but overly prejudicial.
1498:
A wide variety of tort reforms have been implemented or proposed in different jurisdictions, each attempting to address a particular deficiency perceived in the system of tort law. Generally, these can be broken down into two categories: reforms limiting
1539:
damages for the pain and suffering of an injury. But while a scale may be consistent, the award itself is arbitrary and there is no objective basis for the setting of amounts or objective justification for their not being substantially higher or lower.
2771:
who loses an arm suffers a loss to his future job prospects and in the case of fatal accidents, financially dependent relatives may be compensated for the loss of money that their loved one would have provided. Known as "bereavement damages" under the
2562:
that gave immunity to gun manufacturers in certain lawsuits because such lawsuits were "nothing more than thinly veiled attempts to circumvent the legislative process and achieve gun control through litigation"; reform supporters complained that (and
932:. Typical harms can include loss of income (while the person recovers); medical expenses; payment for pain, suffering, or even loss of a body part; or loss of future income (assuming that said loss can be proven to be reasonably likely to occur. See
878:
insurance), and increase legal costs for businesses. Tort reform has primarily been prominent in common law jurisdictions, where criticism of judge-made rules regarding tort actions manifests in calls for statutory reform by the legislature.
1077:
by plaintiffs who seek out jurisdictions with harsher defamation laws and little connection to either the plaintiff, the respondent, or the particular instance of alleged defamation. In response to this trend, the United States adopted the
1380:
Discovery, unique to common law jurisdictions, essentially grants powers to private parties and their counsel which are "functionally equivalent" to the power to issue self-executing administrative subpoenas. Consequently, commentators in
2351:
Critics of tort reform also contend that the real purpose of the proposed changes is to shield businesses, especially large corporations, from having to pay just compensation to consumers, patients and clients for the harm incurred from
1807:
Tort reform is also proposed as one solution to rapidly increasing health care costs in the United States. In a study published in 2005 in the Journal of the American Medical Association, 93% of physicians surveyed reported practicing
1376:
that favours the party that is in control of the information needed by the other party. Instead of encouraging discovery, the rules are described as encouraging lawyers to find new ways to manipulate and distort or conceal information.
1212:
as it may cause consumers to under-invest in care and disregard product safety prior to making a purchase. Furthermore, requiring manufacturers to internalise costs they would otherwise externalise increases the price of goods and, in
2247:
product or its design; or a need for a warning or instruction." This means that evidence of changing the design of a product after an accident cannot be used in court against the manufacturer to prove it is liable for the damage.
2152:
Critics of tort reform contend that the real purpose of the proposed changes is to shield businesses, especially large corporations, from having to pay just compensation to consumers, patients and clients for damages incurred from
1309:
Another argument is that the costs of the tort system, and in particular medical malpractice suits, raise the costs of health care. This argument is most often encountered in relation to litigation in countries that do not have
1711:
has proposed creating specialised medical courts (similar to distinct tax courts) where medically trained judges would evaluate cases and subsequently render precedent-setting decisions. Proponents believe that giving up
1581:
countries as well as certain American states, the losing party must pay for the court costs of the winning party. The English rule Is also a prevailing norm in European civil law jurisdictions. For example, after authors
1465:
Some advocates of tort reform also complain of regulation through litigation, the idea that litigation is being used to achieve regulatory ends that advocates would not be able to achieve through the democratic process.
2278:
Proponents of tort reform counter by pointing to data from New Zealand, which has abolished its medical tort system but has medical error rates close to those in the United States. Tort reform advocates, including
2061:(DOJ), found that the number of civil trials dropped by 47% between 1992 and 2001. The DOJ also found that the median inflation-adjusted award in all tort cases dropped 56.3% between 1992 and 2001 to $ 28,000.
1520:
A common element of tort reform is to try to limit the amount of damages that an injured party may recover from a defendant, even if the injured party is left inadequately compensated as a result of the camp.
1812:, or " clinical behavior because of the threat of malpractice liability." Of physicians surveyed, 43% reported using digital imaging technology in clinically unnecessary circumstances, which includes costly
1329:, "Study after study shows that costs associated with malpractice lawsuits make up 1% to 2% of the nation's $ 2.5 trillion annual health-care bill and that tort reform would barely make a dent in the total."
1434:, is a major objective of tort reform. Opponents of tort reform argue that summary judgment in such cases adequately addresses those issues. In common law jurisdictions which allow for extensive pre-trial
2493:, "that sum of money which will put the party who has been injured in the same position as he would have been if he had not sustained the wrong for which he is now getting his compensation or reparation."
2048:
Opponents of tort reform deny that there has been a "litigation explosion" or "liability crisis", and contend that the changes proposed by tort reform advocates are unjustified. Records maintained by the
1787:
Tort reform advocates argue that the present tort system is too expensive, that meritless lawsuits clog up the courts, that per capita tort costs vary significantly from state to state, and that trial
1349:. It can be argued that strict liability deters innovation, because manufacturers could be reluctant to test out new products for fear that they could be subjecting themselves to massive tort claims.
4693:
Jearey, J. (1961). Trial by Jury and Trial with the Aid of Assessors in the Superior Courts of British African Territories: II. Journal of African Law, 5(1), 36-47. doi:10.1017/S0021855300002941)
2270:
innovative technology in safety as well as other areas. As a result, most safety-related advances in recent years have come from European manufacturers and, more recently, from the Japanese. ...
4858:
2005:
It is argued that extraordinary damage awards in the United States are a result of the jury system. In federal courts in the United States, the right to a jury trial in most civil cases is
1233:
Personal injury law is one of the most controversial topics in tort reform. In New Zealand, the tort system for the majority of personal injuries was scrapped with the establishment of the
2744:
doctrine was applied where someone slipped on yogurt in a supermarket. An employer may have failed to properly fence off some dangerous machinery, which exposes workers to risk of injury.
2041:(ATRA) claims that "The cost of the U.S. tort system for 2003 was $ 246 billion, or $ 845 per citizen or $ 3,380 for a family of four" and "The Growth of U.S. tort costs have exceeded the
2989:
3086:
1217:, price-sensitive markets, price increases cause some consumers to seek substitutes for that product. As a result, manufacturers may not produce the socially optimal level of goods.
4874:
4387:
1613:
In addition to reforms aimed at limiting plaintiff's abilities to claim particular categories of compensation, tort reform measures aimed at reducing the prevalence of lawsuits for
3225:
2489:
In other words, the idea underpinning the law of tort is that if someone harms someone else, they should make up for it. Compensation should be, in the words of Lord Blackburn in
3792:"Rule 11. Signing Pleadings, Motions, and Other Papers; Representations to the Court; Sanctions | Federal Rules of Civil Procedure | LII / Legal Information Institute"
1073:
or dismiss which, if successful, would terminate the lawsuit and allow the party to recover its legal costs from the plaintiff. Another concern with defamation torts is alleged
36:
Lawyer jokes from 1900. Top-hatted lawyer to workman falling off scaffolding: "Take this card, my man, and if you're not killed call on me and I'll recover big damages for you."
5445:
report. October 2003. This report looks at the origins, strategy and tactics of the tort reform movement and its ties to core conservative-movement funders and organisations.
3194:
Klick, Jonathan; Stratmann, Thomas (2003). ""Does Medical Malpractice Reform Help States Retain Physicians and Does it Matter?" by Jonathan Klick and Thomas Stratman (2005)".
2010:
4484:
3279:
1890:
sometimes weighs in on tort reform debates, but here too, the justices do not always vote according to their predicted ideological stereotypes. In the seminal case of
2233:
achieve improved safety. In some cases, however, liability seemed to cause safety improvements to occur more quickly than they would have in the absence of liability.
970:). Consequently, compensation recoverable through tort suits vary even in circumstances where the injury itself is identical, especially when the "at fault" party is
3058:
5347:
3962:
1286:
1942:, "By May , there had been 5,972 lawsuits filed, with Mostyn and members of his firm filing 1,612 of them." Mostyn "had pioneered" lawsuits for storm damage after
2311:
Some supporters of tort reform posit that reforms can significantly reduce the costs of doing business, thus benefiting consumers and the public in the long run.
1883:
1035:
1023:
2748:
1 All ER 870, on the application of the Factories Act 1961, s.14, saying "every dangerous part of any machinery... shall be securely fenced." A manufacturer of
1527:
place limits on noneconomic damages and collecting lawsuit claim data from malpractice insurance companies and courts in order to assess any connection between
4198:
5242:
4773:
967:
95:
3766:
2535:
This figure is disputed, because there is no easy method for accounting for transaction costs, particularly when pre-litigation settlements are considered.
1762:, or litigation funding more generally; is another aspect of procedural policies and reforms designed to reduce the number of cases filed in civil court.
4413:
974:
or merely negligent rather than intentional in causing the purported harm. Consequently, some legal scholars propose to replace tort compensation with a
963:
235:
3293:
Kolstad, Charles D.; Ulen, Thomas S.; Johnson, Gary V. (1990). "Ex Post Liability for Harm vs. Ex Ante Safety Regulation: Substitutes or Complements?".
5559:
Report of the Tort Policy Working Group on the Causes, Extent and Policy Implications of the Current Crisis in Insurance Availability and Affordability
3063:. Annual Meeting of the Economics of Population Health: Inaugural Conference of the American Society of Health Economists. Madison, Wis. Archived from
2559:
5480:
4805:
2328:
to look at the effects of bankruptcies from asbestos litigation on workers in the asbestos industry; the study estimated that 52,000 jobs were lost.
2072:, a major consultant to the insurance industry. In 2008, Towers Perrin reported that the cost of liability litigation has outpaced the growth of the
6782:
2609:
2448:
1650:
Procedural reforms to the tort system aim to dissuade or prevent litigants from filing suit without directly altering the damages they may receive.
3531:
1558:
punitive damages is that such damages encourage a vindictive, revenge seeking state of mind in the claimant and society more generally. In the UK,
5465:
4984:"The frivolous case for tort law change: Opponents of the legal system exaggerate its costs, ignore its benefits | Economic Policy Institute"
3320:
Ewerhart, Christian; Schmitz, Patrick W. (1998). "Ex Post Liability for Harm vs. Ex Ante Safety Regulation: Substitutes or Complements? Comment".
2331:
Critics of the tort reform movement dispute the claim that the current tort system has a significant impact on national or global economies. The
1478:
and enabling the court system to exert inordinate power over the legislative and executive branches of government. For instance, the emergence of
5396:
4374:
4261:
3432:
2995:
1103:
170:
1863:
should be abolished, and there is a healthy debate over whether it would be beneficial to further restrict the ability of attorneys to charge
5415:
4855:
3624:
3226:""Bush Calls Himself Reformer; the Record Shows the Label May Be a Stretch" by Richard A Oppel Jr. and Jim Yardley, NY Times, March 20, 2000"
1879:
1871:
1671:
3254:
4461:
4222:
2857:
Jamie Cassels, "Judicial Activism and Public Interest Litigation in India: Attempting the Impossible" (1989) 37 Am. J. Comp. L. 495 at 509.
1200:
applies. Proponents of tort reform argue that liability serves to increase the cost of goods for customers and that it serves to encourage
5590:
3614:
2883:
2798:
2428:
2133:
1490:
However, opponents of tort reform assert that public interest litigation in India has served to secure "social and distributive justice."
4539:
4353:
5602:
4747:
4640:
2926:
2174:
threat of litigation than large corporations are, because the legal expenses from a single lawsuit can bankrupt a small businessperson.
2058:
1353:
spent on litigation for every £1 of compensation paid. In contrast, the social security system costs 8p or 12p for every £1 delivered.
1094:
Tort reform advocates argue that by limiting the threat of frivolous lawsuits, the medical industry would migrate away from practising
4612:
1442:
is applied) cost of litigation are not necessarily addressed by summary judgment. In particularly oppressive defamation lawsuits, the
1439:
1066:
1048:
Defamation suits, particularly when brought by a large organisation or wealthy individual against a less wealthy critic, may serve to
842:
1878:
torts, contrary to the general assumption that tort reform is a primarily Republican or conservative issue, is a popular cause among
1642:
continue to use contributory negligence, thus precluding a party who is even partly at fault from recovering damages for negligence.
6208:
5766:
5665:
5380:
5276:
4172:
3931:
3743:
3706:
3566:
2601:
2511:
2412:
2377:
2090:
1843:
for defendants faced with bankruptcy, "venue reform", which limits the jurisdictions within which one can file a lawsuit, limits on
1531:
settlements and premium rates. Such caps can be general or limited to a particular category of cases. Non-economic damages include
1234:
2577:
For example, the American federal government has instituted a $ 250,000 cap on non-economic damages for medical malpractice claims.
1574:
3644:
2053:
show that population-adjusted tort filings declined from 1992 to 2001. The average change in tort filings was a 15% decrease. The
6322:
6191:
5289:
4492:
2613:
2407:
2050:
2038:
981:
Proposals for tort reform primarily centre on addressing perceived deficits in four areas of tort law: personal injury lawsuits,
5223:
4830:
3489:
3136:""The Medical Malpractice 'Crisis': Recent Trends And The Impact Of State Tort Reforms" by Kenneth E. Thorpe (January 21, 2004)"
946:(restoration to original state). However, since the emphasis under tort law is on the violation by an individual of a purported
6777:
6124:
6025:
5026:
561:
5493:
6284:
5918:
2832:
1972:
4647:
3631:
Faced with grinding discovery demands that distract employees from operating the business, even blameless defendants settle.
4287:
4105:
5637:
3449:
3064:
2728:
For instance, a supermarket may not have been safe enough for its customers to shop in by failing to mop up a spillage of
5460:
2045:(GDP) by 2-3 per centage points in the past 50 years". This claim is based on a 2002 study by Tillinghast-Towers Perrin.
6444:
5923:
5449:
4514:
2340:
2054:
1795:
in tort cases. (The typical contingent fee arrangement provides for the lawyer to retain one-third of any recovery.) A
351:
5575:
Black et al. Do Defendants Pay What Juries Award? Post-Verdict Haircuts in Texas Medical Malpractice Cases, 1988–2003,
4006:
Joni Hersch and W. Kip Viscusi, "Punitive Damages: How Judges and Juries Perform," 33 J. Legal Stud. 1 (January 2004),
2077:
and 2009, and are now at their lowest level since 1984. The Tillinghast/Towers Perrin study has been criticised by the
6439:
5392:
2605:
2141:
1887:
1733:
1565:
though rarely awarded in tort cases, punitive damages are available, and are sometimes quite staggering when awarded.
1368:
litigation favours the wealthier side in a lawsuit by enabling parties to drain each other's financial resources in a
567:
5509:
4587:
3919:
P N Bhagwati, "The Role of the Judiciary in the Democratic and Judicial Restraint" (1992) 18 CommwLBull 1262 at 1266.
2068:
Supporters frequently base their claims of an "explosion" in the costs of tort litigation based on annual studies by
1800:
lowest level since 1984. High-profile tort cases are often portrayed by the media as the legal system's version of a
4195:
2941:
1851:
of "loser pays" (the defeated party must pay both the plaintiff's and the defendant's expenses), and requiring that
6414:
5913:
5566:
Zeiler et al. Physicians' Insurance Limits and Malpractice Payments: Evidence from Texas Closed Claims, 1990–2003,
5246:
2300:
1955:
1860:
1832:
1471:
950:, compensation is determined to a large extent by the extent to which the "at fault" party violated the applicable
341:
5438:
5410:, Chapter Four (Section 4.05: "Juror Attitudes About Lawsuits and Tort Reform". New York: American Lawyer Media.
4780:
2099:
Australia and the United Kingdom drew up proposals for similar no-fault schemes, but they were never implemented.
1573:
Another possible modification of tort law, in jurisdictions where it is not already the norm, is to implement the
6497:
4927:
3770:
2637:
2332:
2283:, also argue that litigation has driven from the US marketplace many useful and safe medical advances, including
2116:
2078:
1859:
Not all tort reform supporters support all proposed tort reforms. For example, there is a split over whether the
1828:
1759:
1524:
1475:
656:
505:
5557:
3834:"Preamble: A Lawyer's Responsibilities - Professional Guidelines and Rules of Conduct - Professional Guidelines"
1708:
1397:, and insofar as discovery may be able to facilitate the creation of new rights, that is the prerogative of the
1169:
as it enables unpredictable events to give rise to liability. The strictness of this approach, under which even
6292:
6274:
5534:
4924:
The frivolous case for tort law change: Opponents of the legal system exaggerate its costs, ignore its benefits
2773:
2259:
2192:
1951:
1598:
1550:
1467:
1460:
1443:
1382:
1070:
689:
673:
240:
200:
5943:
4410:
4218:
1874:, both support of and opposition to tort reform is found across the political spectrum in America. Reform of
1332:
Another argument is that tort liability may stunt innovation. This argument usually comes in connection with
6667:
6454:
5928:
5434:
2734:
2312:
1993:
1622:
1578:
1389:
and as "a private inquisition." Civil law countries see the underlying objectives of discovery as properly
1274:
554:
379:
346:
4704:
4235:
3899:
1486:. Controversy further arose when judges began to read such obligations of the state into Article 21 of the
954:
with regard to the plaintiff rather than solely by the harm purportedly suffered and distinguishes between
6722:
6707:
5442:
4809:
4020:
2465:
2397:
2320:
through more pragmatic approaches." A commission by the American Insurance Association and co-authored by
2042:
1740:
1654:
1618:
1587:
1394:
1325:
1214:
942:
888:
835:
750:
572:
483:
326:
271:
175:
70:
3991:
1393:
in order to maintain the rule of law: the investigative objective of discovery is the prerogative of the
928:, requiring the party "at fault" for a particular harm to provide compensation, typically in the form of
6826:
6419:
6097:
5908:
5553:
5421:
5372:
4718:
3541:
3135:
2897:
2225:
2120:
2026:
1967:
1931:
1755:
1487:
1319:
1311:
710:
684:
603:
493:
488:
450:
245:
205:
192:
1503:
recoverable by a plaintiff and procedural reforms limiting the ability of plaintiffs to file lawsuits.
5502:
5180:""First Do No Harm? Tort Reform and Birth Outcomes" by Janet Currie and W. Bentley MacLeod (May 2008)"
6547:
5893:
4002:$ 4.8 billion was the largest non-class action judgment for punitive damages according to one study.
2754:
2568:
bill gave unprecedented immunity to a single industry, and claimed that the law was unconstitutional.
2518:. Its goal is to achieve equality of compensation, while reducing costs of litigation. In the 1970s,
2417:
2402:
2069:
1342:
1259:
182:
122:
4895:
4636:
2758:
AC 580, where a decomposed snail was found in a soft drink, see Lord Atkin's judgment in particular.
1470:
suits in America are frequently criticised as examples of regulation through litigation. Similarly,
6860:
6702:
5842:
5759:
5519:
5004:
2752:
may have allowed a bottle it sells to have become contaminated, which has made a consumer ill. See
2435:
2382:
2361:
2255:
2187:, and encourage more safe and effective medical practices. Beginning in the early 1980s, Professor
2162:
2006:
1909:
1373:
1263:
1099:
982:
933:
891:
for actions—not arising from a contract—that cause a claimant to suffer loss or harm, resulting in
875:
547:
541:
500:
437:
260:
61:
5153:
5092:
4159:
4158:, see N.Y. CPLR § 214-a, which can be found under money CVP, Article 2, LIMITATIONS OF TIME, at
3588:"GAO Study, Medical Malpractice, Implications of Raising Premiums on Access to Medical Care, 2003"
2242:
inclined to delay design improvements when they fear that improvements will be used against them .
1345:, is lower in other injury cases, so that a victim would have to prove that a tortfeasor had been
1298:
Another rationale for tort reform is the distortionary impact tort litigation has on the economy.
1102:
insurance to the rising cost of personal and group policy health insurance coverage. California's
6517:
6176:
6030:
6015:
5993:
5737:
5717:
5670:
5660:
5202:
5175:
5129:"Rule 403. Excluding Relevant Evidence for Prejudice, Confusion, Waste of Time, or Other Reasons"
5059:
4469:
3877:
3692:
3610:
3372:
3329:
3302:
3111:
3011:"Congressional Budget Office (January 8, 2004) "Limiting Tort Liability for Medical Malpractice""
2507:
2217:
2209:
2126:
2022:
1935:
1896:, the court ruled that the Constitution placed limits on punitive damages, with liberal justices
1809:
1717:
1532:
1238:
1137:
1095:
1010:
913:
790:
677:
608:
577:
468:
432:
408:
364:
147:
89:
5537:
4436:"Defensive Medicine Among High-Risk Specialist Physicians in a Volatile Malpractice Environment"
4214:
1916:, some expect the court to be more likely to take cases that could resolve tort reform debates.
1422:
in frivolous lawsuits are a nuisance for individuals against whom such litigation is brought in
17:
4332:
3391:
2905:
1196:. In most common law jurisdictions and in member states of the European Union, the doctrine of
6855:
6502:
6424:
6262:
6005:
6000:
5953:
5878:
5872:
5712:
5630:
5411:
5405:
5376:
5272:
4025:
3996:
3854:
3833:
3739:
3733:
3702:
3677:
3620:
3562:
3414:
3364:
3207:
3155:
2740:
2453:
2365:
2316:
1920:
1901:
1781:
1592:
1483:
1479:
1406:
1369:
1333:
1221:
1193:
1183:
1143:
1108:
1062:
1018:
1014:
986:
959:
921:
905:
828:
735:
730:
720:
715:
531:
510:
374:
320:
307:
255:
215:
5599:
4751:
4651:
3696:
3211:
1725:
wanton" acts. This has been interpreted as including only acts intended to harm the patient.
6507:
6474:
5973:
5837:
5832:
5797:
5487:
5483:(study asserting that corporations are the most frequent initiators of litigation in the US)
5453:
5194:
4733:
4443:
3976:
3679:
Double Billing: A Young Lawyer's Tale of Greed, Sex, Lies, and the Pursuit of a Swivel Chair
3406:
3356:
3199:
3147:
2625:
2621:
2458:
2441:
2392:
2288:
2266:
2205:
2166:
1984:
1840:
1836:
1824:
1658:
1560:
1546:
1542:
1427:
1337:
1197:
1187:
1150:
1069:
and Ontario's Protection of Public Participation Act do so by enabling defendants to make a
951:
909:
725:
598:
526:
478:
427:
360:
302:
210:
187:
129:
117:
3112:""The Efficiency of Medical Malpractice Law: Theory and Empirical Evidence" (October 2000)"
1687:
are lawsuits where a group of claimants band together to bring similar claims all at once.
6756:
6729:
6717:
6697:
6631:
6626:
6609:
6589:
6584:
6564:
6429:
6409:
6404:
6307:
6267:
5978:
5903:
5827:
5812:
5732:
5606:
5498:
4862:
4417:
4202:
3935:
2629:
2325:
1946:. He made over $ 86 million in legal fees. In February 2017, a bill was introduced in the
1844:
1583:
1435:
1419:
1362:
1166:
1158:
975:
892:
402:
331:
314:
5320:
5227:
4676:
4435:
3928:
3347:
Shavell, Steven (1984). "A Model of the Optimal Use of Liability and Safety Regulation".
5429:
2335:
wrote that the effect on the economy of job loss resulting from lawsuits is negligible:
6833:
6641:
6559:
6148:
6114:
6065:
6050:
5822:
5727:
5707:
5697:
5476:
5401:
5364:
5149:
5146:
5088:
5085:
3554:
2814:
2523:
2221:
2108:
2014:
1905:
1897:
1864:
1751:
1693:
1635:
1431:
1390:
1315:
1281:
1270:
1074:
971:
780:
536:
418:
336:
138:
84:
79:
32:
5296:
5243:"The Cutter Incident: A Legal Tale of Unintended Consequences for Vaccine Development"
4834:
3410:
1082:
which expressly limits the enforceability of offshore judgements in defamation cases.
6849:
6687:
6646:
6532:
6512:
6484:
6434:
6399:
6373:
6368:
6361:
6312:
6252:
6092:
6082:
6040:
5963:
5958:
5888:
5847:
5771:
5529:
5514:
5505:(article discussing US Chamber of Commerce's use of newspaper to promote tort reform)
5206:
3536:
3493:
2617:
2188:
2112:
1998:
1943:
1938:’ to remind homeowners that they had to file a claim within two years." According to
1925:
1796:
1776:
1713:
1701:
1162:
1116:
present tort system is an expensive and inefficient way to compensate those injured.
1057:
1043:
859:
745:
620:
5524:
5510:
testimony about Small Business Liability Reform Act before House Judiciary Committee
5033:
3791:
2608:, which granted civil immunity to telecommunications companies that cooperated with
1775:
Tort reform advocates frequently contend that too many of the lawsuits filed in the
1208:. Conversely, proponents of tort reform argue that strict liability creates risk of
6819:
6569:
6537:
6492:
6230:
6225:
6196:
6109:
6087:
6055:
5988:
5968:
5862:
5802:
5792:
5744:
5702:
5680:
5623:
5171:
4225:
by Betsy McCaughey The Wall Street Journal, August 24, 2005, accessed Aug. 2, 2006.
4061:
3951:(2006), which lay out the standard figures, up to £200,000 for severe brain damages
3010:
2888:
2597:
2564:
2555:
2472:(concerning reform of patent law, which pits similar interests against one another)
2469:
2422:
2296:
1947:
1913:
1852:
1848:
1688:
1680:
1554:
1242:
1209:
947:
798:
785:
775:
740:
694:
280:
3812:
1341:
fault. The standard, which originated in the twentieth century with cases such as
5128:
5110:
4083:
2129:(Royal Commission on Civil Liability and Compensation for Personal Injuries) 1979
1577:
whereby the losing party to a case covers the victorious party's legal costs. In
6800:
6741:
6682:
6672:
6469:
6464:
6302:
6203:
6119:
6078:
6045:
6010:
5933:
5857:
5807:
5722:
5198:
4962:
4554:
4291:
3938:, National Conference of State Legislatures, May 1, 2006, accessed Aug. 3, 2006.
2768:
2749:
2510:
scheme for all accident victims, which provides benefit from the government-run
2503:
2321:
1959:
1892:
1791:
too often receive an overly large percentage of the punitive damages awarded to
1528:
1398:
1386:
1002:
811:
384:
250:
165:
4940:
3508:
2818:(1978) by the "Royal Commission on Civil Liability and Compensation for Injury"
2640:
opposes many tort reform measures, arguing that litigation can be used to keep
1553:
jurisdictions, punitive damages are unavailable and are considered contrary to
6805:
6734:
6614:
6552:
6297:
6218:
6213:
6171:
6153:
6141:
6102:
5948:
5938:
5898:
5883:
5867:
5817:
5754:
5749:
4377:, 352 S.E.2d 73, 80 (W.Va. 1986) ("the standard contingent fee is 33 percent")
4040:
2991:
The Tort of Defamation: An Analysis of the Law in India and the United Kingdom
2515:
2357:
2280:
2196:
several ways that litigation can also enhance safety for everyone, including:
2158:
2018:
1875:
1729:
1697:
1614:
1602:
1448:
1414:
1346:
1170:
1079:
1053:
1049:
1039:
990:
955:
925:
896:
871:
863:
816:
760:
663:
615:
285:
226:
152:
44:
5032:. Johns Hopkins University Center for Gun Policy and Research. Archived from
4447:
3418:
3368:
3178:
2526:
drew up proposals for similar no-fault schemes but they were later abandoned.
2262:, claimed safety (and other) innovations were inhibited by fear of lawsuits:
6712:
6677:
6619:
6594:
6459:
6356:
6344:
6329:
6317:
6245:
6163:
6136:
6020:
5354:
5288:
Stiglitz, Joseph E.; Orszag, Jonathan M.; Orszag, Peter R. (December 2002).
4262:"Closing Arguments: Is Wisconsin's collateral-source rule worth preserving?"
3878:"Virginia State Bar - Professional Regulation - Disciplinary System Actions"
2519:
2284:
1792:
1684:
1423:
1410:
1303:
794:
5530:
Economic Policy Institute response to response of Tillinghast/Towers Perrin
3159:
3587:
3151:
2287:(the withdrawal of which has led to a doubling of hospital admissions for
6761:
6746:
6449:
6334:
6131:
5675:
5135:. Legal Information Institute, Cornell University Law School. 2011-11-30.
5117:. Legal Information Institute, Cornell University Law School. 2011-11-30.
3949:
Guidelines for the Assessment of General Damages in Personal Injury Cases
3698:
Rights and Retrenchment: The Counterrevolution Against Federal Litigation
2975:
2800:
Medical malpractice - an international perspective of tort system reforms
2633:
2344:
2184:
1817:
1639:
1631:
770:
630:
393:
290:
112:
5369:
The Liability Maze: The Impact of Liability Law on Safety and Innovation
5179:
5027:"Litigation Is an Important Tool for Injury and Gun Violence Prevention"
3203:
1884:
lawsuits brought by wealthy corporations and individuals against critics
6651:
6599:
6579:
6527:
6339:
6257:
6073:
6035:
5983:
4983:
4923:
3376:
3306:
2387:
2292:
2216:
Tort reform advocates cite a 1990 study of auto safety improvements by
1801:
1744:
1627:
1500:
1006:
929:
901:
625:
593:
473:
295:
5543:
4918:
4916:
3333:
6751:
6604:
6349:
6240:
6235:
6181:
5852:
5594:
3900:"LA Times (October 21, 2005) "Bill to Shield Gun Makers Is Approved""
3433:"Understanding the Real Life Issues Underlying Tort Reform Proposals"
2729:
2641:
1788:
1728:
Tort reformers have had the most legislative success in limiting the
668:
635:
4183:
3360:
2686:
5574:
5565:
5063:
4007:
3057:
Bagga, Shalini; Khan, M. Mahmud; Dhankhar, Praveen (June 4, 2006).
3032:
1950:
that would aim "at ending hailstorm lawsuit abuse." Texas Lt. Gov.
6692:
6636:
6542:
6383:
6186:
5685:
4930:, May 17, 2005 (EPI Briefing Paper #157), retrieved March 31, 2007
2632:
has often criticised products liability law; and the conservative
2353:
2165:
or other legitimate tort claims. They contend that limitations on
2154:
1992:
998:
445:
31:
1192:
A large portion of the debate surrounding tort reform focuses on
978:
framework that serves victims without respect to cause or fault.
6574:
6522:
6378:
5776:
5692:
4239:
4021:"GM Files Appeal of $ 1.2-Billion Verdict, Calling Trial Unfair"
3490:"In Hospital Deaths from Medical Errors at 195,000 per Year USA"
3060:
Medical Malpractice: Examining its Effect on Hospital Efficiency
2893:
1988:
1617:, the most commonly alleged tort, aim to revise the doctrine of
1409:
is one that cannot reasonably be supported under existing legal
867:
866:
countries that aim to reduce the ability of plaintiffs to bring
459:
52:
5619:
5290:
The Impact of Asbestos Liabilities on Workers in Bankrupt Firms
3735:
Failures of American Civil Justice in International Perspective
2254:
Another presenter at the same Brooking Institution conference,
1653:
One type of procedural reform is to reduce the time to sue—the
1302:
tort litigation and payouts will benefit everyone who pays for
5646:
4361:
3450:"Medical negligence costs 'threat' to National Health Service"
2901:
2687:"Punitive Damages as Aggravated Damages: The Case of Contract"
2073:
1934:, Texas. "One local attorney had erected a billboard ‘evoking
1813:
1679:
Another type of procedural reform is imposing restrictions on
1269:
then they can get full compensation (if the tortfeaser is not
1696:
has become a contentious aspect of tort reform, notably with
1426:. Curtailing frivolous lawsuits, especially those brought by
4313:
Bogus, Carl T. (2008). "Introduction: Genuine Tort Reform".
4084:"The Litigation Explosion - Strict Liability for Lawyering"
1823:
A few of the changes frequently advocated include limits on
4333:"Public Citizen Debunks myths propounded by Tort Reformers"
1056:, and silence critics by burdening them with the cost of a
4613:"Hailstorm lawsuit reform bill introduced in Texas Senate"
4205:
Philip G. Peters, Jr., Boston University Law Review, 2008.
1204:. Opponents of tort reform argue that it would negatively
5494:"What Is Tort Reform - and Why Is It Bad for the Public?"
2001:
is unusual in almost all countries for non-criminal cases
4831:"Civil Trial Cases and Verdicts in Large Counties, 2001"
4750:. American Tort Reform Association. 2007. Archived from
4748:"Facts About Tort Liability And Its Impact On Consumers"
3616:
Second-Best Justice: The Virtues of Japanese Private Law
2834:
The Concept of Strict and Absolute Liability: A Critique
1954:
supported the bill (Senate Bill 10) and said during his
1165:, or a third party's mistake. Consequently, it creates
5615:
5338:
Dobbs, Dan B., Hayden, Paul T., and Bublick, Ellen M.
3738:. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. p. 151.
940:
for proved harm. This is known under the Latin phrase
900:
the different types of damages awarded by the courts:
4186:, Mehlman, Maxwell and Nance, Dale A., April 1, 2007.
3701:. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. p. 70.
3392:"On the joint use of liability and safety regulation"
5488:
Tort Laws on Trial: Lawsuit Liability Measures, 2004
4388:"Towers Perrin 2008 Update on U.S. Tort Cost Trends"
4221:
USA Today, July 4, 2005, accessed Aug. 3, 2006; and
3727:
3725:
2797:
For a speech by High Court judge Michael Kirby, see
2616:, the Democrats' vice presidential nominee, Senator
1870:
While tort reform is frequently associated with the
1683:
lawsuits in jurisdictions where they are available.
6770:
6660:
6483:
6392:
6283:
6162:
6064:
5785:
5653:
2011:
Seventh Amendment of the United States Constitution
1882:and liberals more generally who are concerned with
4238:. American Tort Reform Association. Archived from
3280:M.C. Mehta v. Union of India (Oleum Gas Leak Case)
3255:"Despite Counsel, Victim Is Hindered by Tort Laws"
2339:In an April 2002 paper, the CEA (President Bush's
1482:has been criticised as an undemocratic example of
1201:
5342:. Eighth edition. West Academic Publishing, 2017.
4875:"Towers Perrin report on tort costs through 2007"
4833:. US Bureau of Justice Statistics. Archived from
4268:. The Daily Reporter Publishing Co. 10 March 2016
4041:"Blog reports on Texas adoption of Loser Pay Law"
2870:Noor Mahmmad Usmanbhai Mansuri v State of Gujarat
2620:, was a leading supporter of tort reform; former
924:, tort law is based on the principle of fault or
5397:"The Economics of U.S. Tort Liability: A Primer"
4406:
4404:
3492:. Medical News Today. 2004-08-09. Archived from
1839:, elimination of elections for judges, reducing
895:for the person who commits the tortious act. In
2264:
2239:
2230:
2198:
1663:
1157:, absolute liability does not defences such as
936:). The classical purpose of tort is to provide
27:Legal reforms aimed at reducing tort litigation
5324:Sourcewatch: Center for Justice and Democracy.
5007:. American Association for Justice. 2014-02-26
4375:"Hayseeds, Inc. v. State Farm Fire & Cas."
3992:"Judge Cuts Award Against GM to $ 1.2 Billion"
3960:see generally, Patrick Atiyah and Peter Cane,
2942:"Protection of Public Participation Act, 2015"
2667:
2665:
2663:
2661:
1958:, "Hailstorm litigation is the newest form of
1036:Strategic lawsuit against public participation
5631:
5481:"Corporate Hypocrisy in Accessing the Courts"
4963:"Walter Olson summary, with links (May 2005)"
4223:Health Courts Endorsed in Wall Street Journal
4106:"An Economic Case for Comparative Negligence"
3645:"Discovery Abuse: Appointing Special Masters"
2715:Williams, G. "The Aims of the Law of Tort",
1923:in Texas was hit with two severe hailstorms.
1474:in India has been criticised for undermining
836:
8:
5348:Atiyah's Accidents, Compensation and the Law
4705:"Lee Kuan Yew's Opposition to Trial by Jury"
4588:"A Hail of a Storm Is Brewing in the Senate"
4160:The New York State Assembly official website
3963:Atiyah's Accidents, Compensation and the Law
3619:. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
3248:
3246:
3087:"To Curb Malpractice, Try Federal Licensing"
2303:, which kills one hundred infants per year.
968:intentional infliction of emotional distress
96:Intentional infliction of emotional distress
5295:(Report). Sebago Associates. Archived from
4440:Journal of the American Medical Association
4104:Cooter, Robert D.; Ulen, Thomas S. (1986).
3813:"LIS > Code of Virginia > 8.01-271.1"
3672:
3670:
1716:and scheduling noneconomic damages such as
5638:
5624:
5616:
4719:"section 16, Senior Courts Act 2016 No 48"
3966:(2006) 6th Ed., Cambridge University Press
3682:(New York: William Morrow, 1998), 125–126.
3146:. Content.healthaffairs.org: W4–20–W4–30.
2853:
2851:
2596:For instance, while serving as a senator,
2033:Dispute over "litigation explosion" claims
964:negligent infliction of emotional distress
843:
829:
236:Negligent infliction of emotional distress
39:
5461:The Impact of Medical Malpractice Reforms
4236:"Joint and Several Liability Rule Reform"
3399:International Review of Law and Economics
3189:
3187:
2445:(concerning $ 67m for a judge's trousers)
1280:This was the basis for much of Professor
6783:History of the American legal profession
5439:The Attack on Trial Lawyers and Tort Law
5111:"Rule 407. Subsequent Remedial Measures"
2826:
2824:
2449:Private Securities Litigation Reform Act
5466:Annual Review of Law and Social Science
5407:Courtroom Psychology and Trial Advocacy
4922:Lawrence Chimerine and Ross Eisenbrey,
4430:
4428:
4426:
3466:3 All ER 138 on the increase of damages
3181:Medscape Medical News, October 5, 2011.
2865:
2863:
2657:
2482:
2307:Controversy over the impact on business
758:
702:
643:
585:
518:
458:
417:
392:
359:
270:
225:
137:
104:
69:
51:
4941:"Economic Policy Institute (May 2005)"
4485:"November Election A Lawyer's Delight"
3532:"The Truth About Malpractice Lawsuits"
3179:Rising Insurance Premiums? Yes and No.
1590:lost their plagiarism litigation over
1154:
1104:Medical Injury Compensation Reform Act
5538:response to Economic Policy Institute
5005:"Promote Accountability & Safety"
4581:
4579:
4577:
4575:
1205:
870:litigation (particularly actions for
7:
5544:Tort Law Reform in the United States
5459:Liu, Jing; Hyman, David A. (2020). "
5269:The Competitive Advantage of Nations
5193:(2). Mitpressjournals.org: 795–830.
4513:Kinsley, Michael (August 28, 2005).
4315:Roger Williams University Law Review
3559:The Competitive Advantage of Nations
3253:Aaronson, Becca (January 24, 2013).
2882:Rafsanjani, Nazanin (2 April 2010).
1385:regard discovery destructive of the
5241:Offit, Paul A. (January 23, 2009).
5064:"Tort Reform and Accidental Deaths"
3767:"The Myth Of The Frivolous Lawsuit"
1287:Accidents, Compensation and the Law
5600:Legal- Civil Trials and Tort Costs
5577:Journal of Empirical Legal Studies
5503:"Advocacy Groups Blur Media Lines"
4806:"National Center for State Courts"
1549:awardable to a plaintiff. In most
1067:California Code of Civil Procedure
1009:). Additionally, the emergence of
25:
5767:Restitution and unjust enrichment
5492:Justinian Lane, 2003 30 October,
5430:"Rule of Law: Ambush In Angleton"
4483:Fisher, Daniel (11 August 2008).
4411:U.S. Tort Cost Trends 2010 Update
4173:Class Action Fairness Act of 2005
2602:Class Action Fairness Act of 2005
2512:Accident Compensation Corporation
2429:Liebeck v. McDonald's Restaurants
2413:Class Action Fairness Act of 2005
2378:Accident Compensation Corporation
2368:or other legitimate tort claims.
2091:Accident Compensation Corporation
1672:N.Y. Civil Practice Law and Rules
1284:'s scholarship as articulated in
1235:Accident Compensation Corporation
6814:
6813:
6799:
5450:"Beware of 'Junk Lawsuits' Hype"
4808:. Ncsconline.org. Archived from
4184:"The Case Against Health Courts"
3769:. Tortdeform.com. Archived from
3509:"Medical Negligence and the NHS"
2408:American Tort Reform Association
2142:NHS Redress (Wales) Measure 2007
2051:National Center for State Courts
2039:American Tort Reform Association
1912:dissenting. Under Chief Justice
920:With regard to torts other than
810:
18:Tort reform in the United States
6778:History of the legal profession
5448:Jeff Milchen, 2004 27 October,
4721:. Parliamentary Counsel Office.
3929:Medical Malpractice Tort Reform
3530:Arnst, Catherine (2009-09-16).
2976:Defamation Act 1957 (Singapore)
2965:Defamation Act, 1952 (England).
2946:Legislative Assembly of Ontario
2506:introduced the first universal
1277:, particularly in New Zealand.
562:Ex turpi causa non oritur actio
5187:Quarterly Journal of Economics
4586:Ratcliffe, R.G. (2015-04-29).
4468:. May 10, 2005. Archived from
4110:New York University Law Review
3033:"The Medical Malpractice Myth"
2928:Cal. Code of Civil Procedure §
2786:Livingstone v Rawyards Coal Co
2612:operations. Similarly, in the
2558:(D-VA) argued in support of a
2491:Livingstone v Rawyards Coal Co
1973:Texas House of Representatives
1966:, "The bill also seeks to end
1829:limits on non-economic damages
1:
5456:of the American legal system)
4779:. 19 May 2005. Archived from
4555:"The nominee is John Roberts"
4162:. Accessed January 24, 2009.
3990:Hong, Peter Y. (1999-08-27).
3898:Simon, Richard (2005-10-21).
3794:. Law.cornell.edu. 2011-11-30
3411:10.1016/s0144-8188(00)00037-5
3349:The RAND Journal of Economics
2691:Canadian Business Law Journal
2301:Group B Streptococcal disease
2204:In contrast, a 2006 study by
1919:In March and April 2012, the
1904:in the majority and Justices
1754:; as well as rules regarding
1455:Regulation through litigation
1202:regulation through litigation
672:(term used for torts in some
5068:Journal of Law and Economics
4961:Olson, Walter (2005-05-26).
4731:the words of Lord Devlin in
4553:Frank, Ted (July 20, 2005).
4515:"Taking Vioxx -- for Plenty"
4064:. PointofLaw.com. 2004-05-21
3507:A. Towse; P. Danson (1999).
3390:Schmitz, Patrick W. (2000).
3322:The American Economic Review
3295:The American Economic Review
3031:Klein, Ezra (11 July 2006).
2432:(the McDonald's coffee case)
2341:Council of Economic Advisors
2055:Bureau of Justice Statistics
1438:, the burden and (where the
1155:product liability litigation
5393:Congressional Budget Office
5367:and Robert E. Litan, eds.,
5199:10.1162/qjec.2008.123.2.795
4677:"Singapore - The Judiciary"
4611:Yates, David (2017-02-13).
4288:"Collateral source reforms"
4019:Malnic, Eric (2000-12-07).
3732:Maxeiner, James R. (2011).
3134:Thorpe, Kenneth E. (2004).
2610:NSA warrantless wiretapping
2183:dangerous products such as
1888:United States Supreme Court
1766:Tort reform by jurisdiction
1734:joint and several liability
1428:lawyers acting in bad faith
858:consists of changes in the
568:Joint and several liability
6877:
6445:International legal theory
5924:International slavery laws
5919:International human rights
5914:International criminal law
5074:. Emory Law and Economics.
4219:'Health courts' offer cure
2614:2000 presidential election
2237:Graham further notes that
2208:professors Paul Rubin and
2106:
2088:
1982:
1979:Punitive awards and juries
1956:State of the State address
1861:collateral source doctrine
1833:collateral source doctrine
1472:public interest litigation
1458:
1418:The costs associated with
1360:
1257:
1181:
1141:
1135:
1033:
342:Comparative responsibility
6793:
6498:Administration of justice
5535:Tillinghast/Towers Perrin
5525:"Tort Reform Saves Lives"
5133:Federal Rules of Evidence
5115:Federal Rules of Evidence
4928:Economic Policy Institute
4861:October 25, 2007, at the
4856:Tillinghast/Towers Perrin
4462:"Give the Lawyer His Cut"
4335:. Citizen.org. 2010-12-03
3475:see, Sir Liam Donaldson,
2988:Ayesha (6 October 2010),
2638:Center for a Just Society
2333:Economic Policy Institute
2191:and other faculty at The
2117:Claims management company
2079:Economic Policy Institute
2070:Tillinghast/Towers Perrin
1835:, use of court-appointed
1760:champerty and maintenance
1609:Changes to negligence law
1545:caps limit the amount of
1525:Non-economic damages caps
1476:parliamentary sovereignty
1374:multi-level playing field
1249:Rationale for tort reform
657:Non-economic damages caps
6275:Basic structure doctrine
6125:Natural and legal rights
6006:Public international law
5568:Journal of Legal Studies
4648:École Normale Supérieure
4448:10.1001/jama.293.21.2609
4043:. Americancourthouse.com
3695:; Farhang, Sean (2017).
3283:AIR 1987 SC 1086 Para 32
3196:Journal of Legal Studies
2884:"SLAPP Back: Transcript"
2774:Fatal Accidents Act 1976
2738:1 All ER 219, where the
2560:2005 federal tort reform
2260:University of Birmingham
2224:for a conference at the
2193:Johns Hopkins University
1841:appeal bond requirements
1599:special motion to strike
1468:Private attorney general
1461:Private attorney general
1444:special motion to strike
1391:monopolised by the state
1237:, a universal system of
1071:special motion to strike
690:Private attorney general
644:Other topics in tort law
272:Principles of negligence
201:Alienation of affections
6455:Principle of typicality
5929:International trade law
5547:(subscription required)
5212:(subscription required)
4290:. NAMIC. Archived from
3643:Lord, Miles W. (1986).
2735:Ward v Tesco Stores Ltd
2685:Chapman, Bruce (1990).
2502:For instance, In 1972,
2313:Harvard Business School
1921:Lower Rio Grande Valley
1661:law now requires that:
1623:contributory negligence
1383:civil law jurisdictions
555:Volenti non fit injuria
380:Ultrahazardous activity
347:Contributory negligence
5340:Torts and Compensation
4641:"Lay Justice in India"
4152:For the full section,
3980:AC 1129, 1 All ER 367
3902:. Articles.latimes.com
3544:on September 23, 2009.
2872:(1997) 1 GujLH 49 at .
2788:(1880) 5 App Cas 25,39
2776:in the United Kingdom.
2717:Current Legal Problems
2466:Software patent debate
2398:United States tort law
2349:
2272:
2244:
2235:
2202:
2138:(2003) Crown Copyright
2043:Gross Domestic Product
2002:
1847:, the adoption of the
1741:collateral source rule
1677:
1655:statute of limitations
1619:comparative negligence
1326:Bloomberg Businessweek
1225:than strict liability
943:restitutio in integrum
573:Market share liability
506:Shopkeeper's privilege
484:Statute of limitations
327:Restitutio ad integrum
176:Intrusion on seclusion
71:Trespass to the person
37:
6450:Principle of legality
6209:Delegated legislation
5909:Intellectual property
5554:Reagan Administration
5373:Brookings Institution
5230:on February 23, 2009.
4543:, 517 U.S. 559 (1996)
4354:"Debunking the Myths"
4266:Wisconsin Law Journal
3880:. Vsb.org. 2012-02-01
3836:. Vsb.org. 2008-11-09
3152:10.1377/hlthaff.w4.20
3013:. Cbo.gov. 2004-01-08
2898:National Public Radio
2337:
2226:Brookings Institution
2121:Compensation Act 2006
2059:Department of Justice
2027:malicious prosecution
1996:
1739:The abolition of the
1707:Tort reform advocate
1494:Categories of reforms
1459:Further information:
1320:Medical Defence Union
1312:universal health care
1254:Equality in treatment
1174:defence to the rule.
1142:Further information:
685:Conflict of tort laws
451:Tortious interference
206:Criminal conversation
193:Malicious prosecution
35:
6668:Barristers' chambers
6610:Legal representation
6548:Justice of the peace
5894:Financial regulation
5443:Commonweal Institute
5371:. Washington, D.C.:
4681:www.country-data.com
4472:on January 23, 2009.
4420:Towers Watson, 2010.
4215:National Law Journal
4155:including exceptions
2837:, Lawyers Club India
2755:Donoghue v Stevenson
2418:Compensation culture
2403:Asbestos and the law
2132:Sir Liam Donaldson,
2057:, a division of the
1480:constitutional torts
1343:Donoghue v Stevenson
1260:Distributive justice
1206:impact public safety
1015:constitutional torts
183:Breach of confidence
6703:Election commission
6415:Expressive function
5944:Landlord–tenant law
5843:Consumer protection
5520:Wall Street Journal
5426:Wall Street Journal
5359:The Damages Lottery
5302:on 26 February 2009
5267:Michael E. Porter,
5249:on January 23, 2009
5176:MacLeod, W. Bentley
5060:Shepherd, Joanna M.
4774:"Location Selector"
4637:Jean-Louis Halpérin
4519:The Washington Post
4495:on January 23, 2009
4294:on 12 December 2017
4143:Dobbs 2017, p. 297.
4134:Dobbs 2017, p. 298.
3855:"FRANCES F. VINSON"
3693:Burbank, Stephen B.
3204:10.2139/ssrn.453481
2812:in the UK, see the
2673:The Damages Lottery
2671:P.S. Atiyah (1997)
2606:FISA Amendments Act
2514:without respect to
2436:Medical malpractice
2383:Australian tort law
2362:medical malpractice
2163:medical malpractice
1910:Ruth Bader Ginsburg
1569:Attorney fee awards
1512:system of damages.
1488:Indian Constitution
1264:Equality of outcome
1229:Personal injury law
1100:medical malpractice
1090:Medical malpractice
983:medical malpractice
934:speculative damages
876:medical malpractice
678:mixed legal systems
548:Respondeat superior
542:Vicarious liability
501:Defence of property
438:Insurance bad faith
352:Attractive nuisance
171:Invasion of privacy
6661:Legal institutions
6528:Lawsuit/Litigation
6518:Dispute resolution
6323:Catholic canon law
6031:State of emergency
5994:Will and testament
5718:Law of obligations
5671:Constitutional law
5661:Administrative law
5605:2007-09-28 at the
5523:, 2005 8 October,
5428:, 2005 22 August,
5160:. pp. 220–21.
5158:The Liability Maze
5097:The Liability Maze
4877:. Towersperrin.com
4703:George P. Landow.
4559:www.pointoflaw.com
4416:2012-01-28 at the
4390:. Towersperrin.com
4364:on August 6, 2011.
4201:2013-05-10 at the
4091:www.pointoflaw.com
4008:available on SSRN.
3934:2009-05-20 at the
3815:. Leg1.state.va.us
3676:Cameron Stracher,
3649:Hamline Law Review
3259:The New York Times
2554:For example, Rep.
2508:no-fault insurance
2218:Harvard University
2210:Joanna M. Shepherd
2127:Pearson Commission
2023:false imprisonment
2003:
1948:Texas state Senate
1936:fire and brimstone
1810:defensive medicine
1718:pain and suffering
1646:Procedural reforms
1533:pain and suffering
1507:Reforms to damages
1399:legislative branch
1239:no-fault insurance
1138:Absolute liability
1132:Absolute liability
1096:defensive medicine
1011:absolute liability
914:Glanville Williams
912:. British scholar
578:Transferred intent
469:Assumption of risk
433:Restraint of trade
409:Rylands v Fletcher
241:Employment-related
90:False imprisonment
38:
6843:
6842:
6503:Constitutionalism
6425:Law and economics
6263:Act of parliament
6001:Product liability
5954:Legal archaeology
5879:Environmental law
5873:Entertainment law
5713:International law
5579:4:3 (March 2007).
5570:36:S2 (June 2007)
5416:978-0-9705970-9-0
4639:(25 March 2011).
4026:Los Angeles Times
3997:Los Angeles Times
3626:978-0-226-28199-5
3611:Ramseyer, J. Mark
2998:on 1 October 2011
2904:). Archived from
2741:res ipsa loquitur
2454:Product liability
2366:product liability
2317:Michael E. Porter
1902:John Paul Stevens
1782:corporate welfare
1593:The Da Vinci Code
1484:judicial activism
1407:frivolous lawsuit
1357:Cost of discovery
1334:product liability
1222:law and economics
1194:product liability
1184:Product liability
1178:Product liability
1167:legal uncertainty
1144:Tort law in India
1063:freedom of speech
987:product liability
960:intentional torts
938:full compensation
922:intentional torts
887:Tort actions are
853:
852:
726:England and Wales
681:
532:Last clear chance
527:Intentional torts
511:Neutral reportage
494:Defense of others
442:
375:Product liability
321:Res ipsa loquitur
308:Reasonable person
216:Breach of promise
65:
16:(Redirected from
6868:
6818:
6817:
6816:
6804:
6803:
6627:Question of fact
6508:Criminal justice
5838:Construction law
5833:Conflict of laws
5798:Agricultural law
5640:
5633:
5626:
5617:
5548:
5454:corporate abuses
5435:David C. Johnson
5326:
5318:
5312:
5311:
5309:
5307:
5301:
5294:
5285:
5279:
5265:
5259:
5258:
5256:
5254:
5245:. Archived from
5238:
5232:
5231:
5226:. Archived from
5220:
5214:
5213:
5210:
5184:
5168:
5162:
5161:
5143:
5137:
5136:
5125:
5119:
5118:
5107:
5101:
5100:
5082:
5076:
5075:
5058:Rubin, Paul H.;
5055:
5049:
5048:
5046:
5044:
5039:on June 29, 2007
5038:
5031:
5023:
5017:
5016:
5014:
5012:
5001:
4995:
4994:
4992:
4991:
4980:
4974:
4973:
4971:
4970:
4965:. Pointoflaw.com
4958:
4952:
4951:
4949:
4948:
4937:
4931:
4920:
4911:
4910:
4908:
4907:
4892:
4886:
4885:
4883:
4882:
4871:
4865:
4853:
4847:
4846:
4844:
4842:
4827:
4821:
4820:
4818:
4817:
4802:
4796:
4795:
4793:
4791:
4785:
4778:
4770:
4764:
4763:
4761:
4759:
4744:
4738:
4734:Rookes v Barnard
4729:
4723:
4722:
4715:
4709:
4708:
4700:
4694:
4691:
4685:
4684:
4673:
4667:
4666:
4664:
4662:
4656:
4650:. Archived from
4645:
4633:
4627:
4626:
4624:
4623:
4608:
4602:
4601:
4599:
4598:
4583:
4570:
4569:
4567:
4565:
4550:
4544:
4536:
4530:
4529:
4527:
4525:
4510:
4504:
4503:
4501:
4500:
4491:. Archived from
4480:
4474:
4473:
4458:
4452:
4451:
4432:
4421:
4408:
4399:
4398:
4396:
4395:
4384:
4378:
4372:
4366:
4365:
4360:. Archived from
4350:
4344:
4343:
4341:
4340:
4329:
4323:
4322:
4310:
4304:
4303:
4301:
4299:
4284:
4278:
4277:
4275:
4273:
4258:
4252:
4251:
4249:
4247:
4242:on 3 August 2010
4232:
4226:
4212:
4206:
4196:"Health Courts?"
4193:
4187:
4181:
4175:
4169:
4163:
4150:
4144:
4141:
4135:
4132:
4126:
4125:
4123:
4121:
4101:
4095:
4094:
4088:
4079:
4073:
4072:
4070:
4069:
4058:
4052:
4051:
4049:
4048:
4037:
4031:
4030:
4016:
4010:
4001:
3987:
3981:
3977:Rookes v Barnard
3973:
3967:
3958:
3952:
3945:
3939:
3926:
3920:
3917:
3911:
3910:
3908:
3907:
3895:
3889:
3888:
3886:
3885:
3874:
3868:
3867:
3865:
3864:
3859:
3851:
3845:
3844:
3842:
3841:
3830:
3824:
3823:
3821:
3820:
3809:
3803:
3802:
3800:
3799:
3788:
3782:
3781:
3779:
3778:
3763:
3757:
3756:
3754:
3752:
3729:
3720:
3719:
3717:
3715:
3689:
3683:
3674:
3665:
3664:
3662:
3660:
3640:
3634:
3633:
3607:
3601:
3600:
3598:
3597:
3592:
3584:
3578:
3577:Cane (2006) 466;
3575:
3569:
3552:
3546:
3545:
3540:. Archived from
3527:
3521:
3520:
3513:Health Economics
3504:
3498:
3497:
3486:
3480:
3473:
3467:
3460:
3454:
3453:
3446:
3440:
3439:
3437:
3429:
3423:
3422:
3396:
3387:
3381:
3380:
3344:
3338:
3337:
3328:(4): 1027–1028.
3317:
3311:
3310:
3290:
3284:
3276:
3270:
3269:
3267:
3265:
3250:
3241:
3240:
3238:
3237:
3222:
3216:
3215:
3191:
3182:
3176:
3170:
3169:
3167:
3166:
3131:
3125:
3124:
3122:
3121:
3116:
3108:
3102:
3101:
3099:
3098:
3083:
3077:
3076:
3074:
3072:
3067:on 23 April 2009
3054:
3048:
3047:
3045:
3043:
3028:
3022:
3021:
3019:
3018:
3007:
3001:
2999:
2994:, archived from
2985:
2979:
2972:
2966:
2963:
2957:
2956:
2954:
2952:
2938:
2932:
2929:
2924:
2918:
2917:
2915:
2913:
2879:
2873:
2867:
2858:
2855:
2846:
2845:
2844:
2842:
2831:Indranil Ghosh,
2828:
2819:
2810:
2804:
2795:
2789:
2783:
2777:
2765:
2759:
2726:
2720:
2713:
2707:
2706:
2704:
2702:
2682:
2676:
2669:
2645:
2594:
2588:
2584:
2578:
2575:
2569:
2552:
2546:
2542:
2536:
2533:
2527:
2500:
2494:
2487:
2459:Punitive damages
2442:Pearson v. Chung
2393:English tort law
2289:morning sickness
2206:Emory University
2178:Impact on safety
2167:punitive damages
1985:Punitive damages
1872:Republican Party
1845:contingency fees
1837:expert witnesses
1825:punitive damages
1675:
1674:(CPLR) § 214-a.
1561:Rookes v Barnard
1547:punitive damages
1543:Punitive damages
1395:executive branch
1370:war of attrition
1338:strict liability
1294:Economic effects
1198:strict liability
1188:Strict liability
1151:strict liability
952:standard of care
845:
838:
831:
815:
814:
671:
440:
303:Standard of care
188:Abuse of process
98:
59:
40:
21:
6876:
6875:
6871:
6870:
6869:
6867:
6866:
6865:
6846:
6845:
6844:
6839:
6812:
6798:
6789:
6766:
6757:Political party
6730:Legal education
6718:Law enforcement
6698:Court of equity
6656:
6632:Question of law
6585:Practice of law
6565:Judicial review
6479:
6430:Legal formalism
6410:Comparative law
6405:Contract theory
6388:
6308:Legal pluralism
6279:
6268:Act of Congress
6192:Executive order
6158:
6060:
5979:Nationality law
5904:Immigration law
5828:Competition law
5781:
5649:
5644:
5607:Wayback Machine
5587:
5546:
5542:Donald Harris,
5499:Washington Post
5422:Richard Epstein
5389:
5387:Further reading
5335:
5330:
5329:
5319:
5315:
5305:
5303:
5299:
5292:
5287:
5286:
5282:
5266:
5262:
5252:
5250:
5240:
5239:
5235:
5224:"Medical Error"
5222:
5221:
5217:
5211:
5182:
5170:
5169:
5165:
5147:Graham, John D.
5145:
5144:
5140:
5127:
5126:
5122:
5109:
5108:
5104:
5086:Graham, John D.
5084:
5083:
5079:
5057:
5056:
5052:
5042:
5040:
5036:
5029:
5025:
5024:
5020:
5010:
5008:
5003:
5002:
4998:
4989:
4987:
4982:
4981:
4977:
4968:
4966:
4960:
4959:
4955:
4946:
4944:
4939:
4938:
4934:
4921:
4914:
4905:
4903:
4894:
4893:
4889:
4880:
4878:
4873:
4872:
4868:
4863:Wayback Machine
4854:
4850:
4840:
4838:
4837:on 22 July 2009
4829:
4828:
4824:
4815:
4813:
4804:
4803:
4799:
4789:
4787:
4783:
4776:
4772:
4771:
4767:
4757:
4755:
4754:on 31 July 2010
4746:
4745:
4741:
4730:
4726:
4717:
4716:
4712:
4702:
4701:
4697:
4692:
4688:
4675:
4674:
4670:
4660:
4658:
4654:
4643:
4635:
4634:
4630:
4621:
4619:
4617:SE Texas Record
4610:
4609:
4605:
4596:
4594:
4585:
4584:
4573:
4563:
4561:
4552:
4551:
4547:
4537:
4533:
4523:
4521:
4512:
4511:
4507:
4498:
4496:
4482:
4481:
4477:
4460:
4459:
4455:
4434:
4433:
4424:
4418:Wayback Machine
4409:
4402:
4393:
4391:
4386:
4385:
4381:
4373:
4369:
4358:www.justice.org
4352:
4351:
4347:
4338:
4336:
4331:
4330:
4326:
4312:
4311:
4307:
4297:
4295:
4286:
4285:
4281:
4271:
4269:
4260:
4259:
4255:
4245:
4243:
4234:
4233:
4229:
4213:
4209:
4203:Wayback Machine
4194:
4190:
4182:
4178:
4170:
4166:
4151:
4147:
4142:
4138:
4133:
4129:
4119:
4117:
4103:
4102:
4098:
4086:
4082:Olson, Walter.
4081:
4080:
4076:
4067:
4065:
4060:
4059:
4055:
4046:
4044:
4039:
4038:
4034:
4018:
4017:
4013:
3989:
3988:
3984:
3974:
3970:
3959:
3955:
3946:
3942:
3936:Wayback Machine
3927:
3923:
3918:
3914:
3905:
3903:
3897:
3896:
3892:
3883:
3881:
3876:
3875:
3871:
3862:
3860:
3857:
3853:
3852:
3848:
3839:
3837:
3832:
3831:
3827:
3818:
3816:
3811:
3810:
3806:
3797:
3795:
3790:
3789:
3785:
3776:
3774:
3765:
3764:
3760:
3750:
3748:
3746:
3731:
3730:
3723:
3713:
3711:
3709:
3691:
3690:
3686:
3675:
3668:
3658:
3656:
3642:
3641:
3637:
3627:
3609:
3608:
3604:
3595:
3593:
3590:
3586:
3585:
3581:
3576:
3572:
3553:
3549:
3529:
3528:
3524:
3506:
3505:
3501:
3488:
3487:
3483:
3474:
3470:
3461:
3457:
3448:
3447:
3443:
3435:
3431:
3430:
3426:
3394:
3389:
3388:
3384:
3361:10.2307/2555680
3346:
3345:
3341:
3319:
3318:
3314:
3292:
3291:
3287:
3277:
3273:
3263:
3261:
3252:
3251:
3244:
3235:
3233:
3224:
3223:
3219:
3193:
3192:
3185:
3177:
3173:
3164:
3162:
3133:
3132:
3128:
3119:
3117:
3114:
3110:
3109:
3105:
3096:
3094:
3085:
3084:
3080:
3070:
3068:
3056:
3055:
3051:
3041:
3039:
3030:
3029:
3025:
3016:
3014:
3009:
3008:
3004:
2987:
2986:
2982:
2973:
2969:
2964:
2960:
2950:
2948:
2940:
2939:
2935:
2927:
2925:
2921:
2911:
2909:
2881:
2880:
2876:
2868:
2861:
2856:
2849:
2840:
2838:
2830:
2829:
2822:
2811:
2807:
2796:
2792:
2784:
2780:
2766:
2762:
2746:Summers v Frost
2727:
2723:
2714:
2710:
2700:
2698:
2684:
2683:
2679:
2670:
2659:
2654:
2649:
2648:
2644:off the market.
2630:Michael Kinsley
2595:
2591:
2585:
2581:
2576:
2572:
2553:
2549:
2543:
2539:
2534:
2530:
2501:
2497:
2488:
2484:
2479:
2374:
2326:Joseph Stiglitz
2309:
2267:trict liability
2180:
2150:
2123:
2105:
2093:
2087:
2035:
1991:
1981:
1964:SE Texas Record
1865:contingent fees
1831:, limiting the
1773:
1768:
1752:contingent fees
1676:
1670:
1648:
1611:
1584:Michael Baigent
1571:
1518:
1509:
1496:
1463:
1457:
1432:contingent fees
1365:
1363:Discovery (law)
1359:
1296:
1266:
1256:
1251:
1231:
1190:
1182:Main articles:
1180:
1159:mistake of fact
1146:
1140:
1134:
1092:
1046:
1034:Main articles:
1032:
1019:Indian tort law
976:social security
893:legal liability
885:
849:
809:
703:By jurisdiction
403:Public nuisance
332:Rescue doctrine
315:Proximate cause
227:Negligent torts
139:Dignitary torts
94:
28:
23:
22:
15:
12:
11:
5:
6874:
6872:
6864:
6863:
6858:
6848:
6847:
6841:
6840:
6838:
6837:
6830:
6823:
6809:
6806:Law portal
6794:
6791:
6790:
6788:
6787:
6786:
6785:
6774:
6772:
6768:
6767:
6765:
6764:
6759:
6754:
6749:
6744:
6739:
6738:
6737:
6727:
6726:
6725:
6715:
6710:
6705:
6700:
6695:
6690:
6685:
6680:
6675:
6670:
6664:
6662:
6658:
6657:
6655:
6654:
6649:
6644:
6642:Trial advocacy
6639:
6634:
6629:
6624:
6623:
6622:
6617:
6612:
6607:
6602:
6597:
6592:
6582:
6577:
6572:
6567:
6562:
6557:
6556:
6555:
6550:
6540:
6535:
6530:
6525:
6520:
6515:
6510:
6505:
6500:
6495:
6489:
6487:
6481:
6480:
6478:
6477:
6472:
6467:
6462:
6457:
6452:
6447:
6442:
6437:
6432:
6427:
6422:
6417:
6412:
6407:
6402:
6396:
6394:
6390:
6389:
6387:
6386:
6381:
6376:
6371:
6366:
6365:
6364:
6354:
6353:
6352:
6347:
6342:
6337:
6332:
6327:
6326:
6325:
6310:
6305:
6300:
6295:
6289:
6287:
6281:
6280:
6278:
6277:
6272:
6271:
6270:
6265:
6260:
6250:
6249:
6248:
6238:
6233:
6228:
6223:
6222:
6221:
6216:
6211:
6201:
6200:
6199:
6194:
6189:
6179:
6174:
6172:Ballot measure
6168:
6166:
6160:
6159:
6157:
6156:
6151:
6149:Legal treatise
6146:
6145:
6144:
6139:
6129:
6128:
6127:
6117:
6115:Letters patent
6112:
6107:
6106:
6105:
6095:
6090:
6085:
6076:
6070:
6068:
6066:Sources of law
6062:
6061:
6059:
6058:
6053:
6051:Unenforced law
6048:
6043:
6038:
6033:
6028:
6023:
6018:
6013:
6008:
6003:
5998:
5997:
5996:
5991:
5981:
5976:
5971:
5966:
5961:
5956:
5951:
5946:
5941:
5936:
5931:
5926:
5921:
5916:
5911:
5906:
5901:
5896:
5891:
5886:
5881:
5876:
5870:
5865:
5860:
5855:
5850:
5845:
5840:
5835:
5830:
5825:
5823:Commercial law
5820:
5815:
5810:
5805:
5800:
5795:
5789:
5787:
5783:
5782:
5780:
5779:
5774:
5769:
5764:
5763:
5762:
5752:
5747:
5742:
5741:
5740:
5735:
5725:
5720:
5715:
5710:
5705:
5700:
5695:
5690:
5689:
5688:
5678:
5673:
5668:
5663:
5657:
5655:
5651:
5650:
5645:
5643:
5642:
5635:
5628:
5620:
5614:
5613:
5597:
5586:
5585:External links
5583:
5582:
5581:
5572:
5563:
5550:
5540:
5532:
5527:
5512:
5506:
5496:
5490:
5486:Rachel Weiss,
5484:
5477:Public Citizen
5474:
5457:
5446:
5432:
5419:
5402:Richard Waites
5399:
5388:
5385:
5384:
5383:
5362:
5352:
5343:
5334:
5331:
5328:
5327:
5313:
5280:
5260:
5233:
5215:
5178:(2012-05-02).
5163:
5138:
5120:
5102:
5099:. p. 184.
5077:
5050:
5018:
4996:
4975:
4953:
4932:
4912:
4887:
4866:
4848:
4822:
4797:
4786:on 19 May 2005
4765:
4739:
4724:
4710:
4695:
4686:
4668:
4628:
4603:
4571:
4545:
4531:
4505:
4475:
4453:
4442:. 2005-06-01.
4422:
4400:
4379:
4367:
4345:
4324:
4305:
4279:
4253:
4227:
4207:
4188:
4176:
4164:
4145:
4136:
4127:
4096:
4074:
4053:
4032:
4011:
3982:
3968:
3953:
3940:
3921:
3912:
3890:
3869:
3846:
3825:
3804:
3783:
3758:
3744:
3721:
3707:
3684:
3666:
3635:
3625:
3602:
3579:
3570:
3555:Michael Porter
3547:
3522:
3499:
3496:on 2011-04-23.
3481:
3468:
3455:
3441:
3424:
3405:(3): 371–382.
3382:
3355:(2): 271–280.
3339:
3312:
3301:(4): 888–901.
3285:
3271:
3242:
3230:New York Times
3217:
3183:
3171:
3140:Health Affairs
3126:
3103:
3091:New York Times
3078:
3049:
3023:
3002:
2980:
2967:
2958:
2933:
2919:
2908:on 21 May 2013
2874:
2859:
2847:
2820:
2815:Pearson Report
2805:
2790:
2778:
2760:
2732:on the floor.
2721:
2708:
2677:
2656:
2655:
2653:
2650:
2647:
2646:
2600:voted for the
2589:
2579:
2570:
2547:
2537:
2528:
2524:United Kingdom
2495:
2481:
2480:
2478:
2475:
2474:
2473:
2463:
2462:
2461:
2456:
2451:
2446:
2438:
2433:
2425:
2420:
2415:
2410:
2405:
2395:
2390:
2388:Alimony reform
2385:
2380:
2373:
2370:
2308:
2305:
2222:John D. Graham
2179:
2176:
2149:
2146:
2145:
2144:
2139:
2130:
2109:Patrick Atiyah
2104:
2103:United Kingdom
2101:
2089:Main article:
2086:
2083:
2034:
2031:
2015:decolonisation
1980:
1977:
1932:Hidalgo County
1906:Antonin Scalia
1898:Stephen Breyer
1772:
1769:
1767:
1764:
1750:Regulation of
1694:forum shopping
1668:
1647:
1644:
1636:North Carolina
1610:
1607:
1570:
1567:
1517:
1514:
1508:
1505:
1495:
1492:
1456:
1453:
1361:Main article:
1358:
1355:
1316:loss of chance
1295:
1292:
1282:Patrick Atiyah
1271:judgment proof
1255:
1252:
1250:
1247:
1230:
1227:
1179:
1176:
1136:Main article:
1133:
1130:
1091:
1088:
1075:forum shopping
1031:
1030:Defamation law
1028:
972:judgment proof
884:
881:
851:
850:
848:
847:
840:
833:
825:
822:
821:
820:
819:
817:Law portal
804:
803:
802:
801:
788:
783:
778:
773:
765:
764:
756:
755:
754:
753:
748:
743:
738:
733:
731:European Union
728:
723:
718:
713:
705:
704:
700:
699:
698:
697:
692:
687:
682:
666:
661:
660:
659:
646:
645:
641:
640:
639:
638:
633:
628:
623:
618:
613:
612:
611:
606:
601:
588:
587:
583:
582:
581:
580:
575:
570:
565:
558:
551:
544:
539:
537:Eggshell skull
534:
529:
521:
520:
516:
515:
514:
513:
508:
503:
498:
497:
496:
486:
481:
476:
471:
463:
462:
456:
455:
454:
453:
448:
443:
441:(American law)
435:
430:
422:
421:
419:Economic torts
415:
414:
413:
412:
405:
397:
396:
390:
389:
388:
387:
382:
377:
369:
368:
357:
356:
355:
354:
349:
344:
339:
337:Duty to rescue
334:
329:
324:
317:
312:
311:
310:
300:
299:
298:
293:
288:
275:
274:
268:
267:
266:
265:
264:
263:
258:
248:
243:
238:
230:
229:
223:
222:
221:
220:
219:
218:
213:
208:
203:
195:
190:
185:
180:
179:
178:
168:
163:
162:
161:
158:
150:
142:
141:
135:
134:
133:
132:
127:
126:
125:
120:
107:
106:
105:Property torts
102:
101:
100:
99:
92:
87:
82:
74:
73:
67:
66:
56:
55:
49:
48:
26:
24:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
6873:
6862:
6859:
6857:
6854:
6853:
6851:
6836:
6835:
6831:
6829:
6828:
6824:
6822:
6821:
6810:
6808:
6807:
6802:
6796:
6795:
6792:
6784:
6781:
6780:
6779:
6776:
6775:
6773:
6769:
6763:
6760:
6758:
6755:
6753:
6750:
6748:
6745:
6743:
6740:
6736:
6733:
6732:
6731:
6728:
6724:
6721:
6720:
6719:
6716:
6714:
6711:
6709:
6706:
6704:
6701:
6699:
6696:
6694:
6691:
6689:
6688:Civil society
6686:
6684:
6681:
6679:
6676:
6674:
6671:
6669:
6666:
6665:
6663:
6659:
6653:
6650:
6648:
6647:Trier of fact
6645:
6643:
6640:
6638:
6635:
6633:
6630:
6628:
6625:
6621:
6618:
6616:
6613:
6611:
6608:
6606:
6603:
6601:
6598:
6596:
6593:
6591:
6588:
6587:
6586:
6583:
6581:
6578:
6576:
6573:
6571:
6568:
6566:
6563:
6561:
6558:
6554:
6551:
6549:
6546:
6545:
6544:
6541:
6539:
6536:
6534:
6533:Legal opinion
6531:
6529:
6526:
6524:
6521:
6519:
6516:
6514:
6513:Court-martial
6511:
6509:
6506:
6504:
6501:
6499:
6496:
6494:
6491:
6490:
6488:
6486:
6485:Jurisprudence
6482:
6476:
6473:
6471:
6468:
6466:
6463:
6461:
6458:
6456:
6453:
6451:
6448:
6446:
6443:
6441:
6438:
6436:
6433:
6431:
6428:
6426:
6423:
6421:
6418:
6416:
6413:
6411:
6408:
6406:
6403:
6401:
6398:
6397:
6395:
6391:
6385:
6382:
6380:
6377:
6375:
6374:Statutory law
6372:
6370:
6369:Socialist law
6367:
6363:
6362:Byzantine law
6360:
6359:
6358:
6355:
6351:
6348:
6346:
6343:
6341:
6338:
6336:
6333:
6331:
6328:
6324:
6321:
6320:
6319:
6316:
6315:
6314:
6313:Religious law
6311:
6309:
6306:
6304:
6301:
6299:
6296:
6294:
6291:
6290:
6288:
6286:
6285:Legal systems
6282:
6276:
6273:
6269:
6266:
6264:
6261:
6259:
6256:
6255:
6254:
6253:Statutory law
6251:
6247:
6244:
6243:
6242:
6239:
6237:
6234:
6232:
6229:
6227:
6224:
6220:
6217:
6215:
6212:
6210:
6207:
6206:
6205:
6202:
6198:
6195:
6193:
6190:
6188:
6185:
6184:
6183:
6180:
6178:
6175:
6173:
6170:
6169:
6167:
6165:
6161:
6155:
6152:
6150:
6147:
6143:
6140:
6138:
6135:
6134:
6133:
6130:
6126:
6123:
6122:
6121:
6118:
6116:
6113:
6111:
6108:
6104:
6101:
6100:
6099:
6096:
6094:
6091:
6089:
6086:
6084:
6083:Statutory law
6080:
6077:
6075:
6072:
6071:
6069:
6067:
6063:
6057:
6054:
6052:
6049:
6047:
6044:
6042:
6041:Transport law
6039:
6037:
6034:
6032:
6029:
6027:
6024:
6022:
6019:
6017:
6014:
6012:
6009:
6007:
6004:
6002:
5999:
5995:
5992:
5990:
5987:
5986:
5985:
5982:
5980:
5977:
5975:
5972:
5970:
5967:
5965:
5962:
5960:
5959:Legal fiction
5957:
5955:
5952:
5950:
5947:
5945:
5942:
5940:
5937:
5935:
5932:
5930:
5927:
5925:
5922:
5920:
5917:
5915:
5912:
5910:
5907:
5905:
5902:
5900:
5897:
5895:
5892:
5890:
5889:Financial law
5887:
5885:
5882:
5880:
5877:
5874:
5871:
5869:
5866:
5864:
5861:
5859:
5856:
5854:
5851:
5849:
5848:Corporate law
5846:
5844:
5841:
5839:
5836:
5834:
5831:
5829:
5826:
5824:
5821:
5819:
5816:
5814:
5811:
5809:
5806:
5804:
5801:
5799:
5796:
5794:
5791:
5790:
5788:
5784:
5778:
5775:
5773:
5772:Statutory law
5770:
5768:
5765:
5761:
5758:
5757:
5756:
5753:
5751:
5748:
5746:
5743:
5739:
5736:
5734:
5731:
5730:
5729:
5726:
5724:
5721:
5719:
5716:
5714:
5711:
5709:
5706:
5704:
5701:
5699:
5696:
5694:
5691:
5687:
5684:
5683:
5682:
5679:
5677:
5674:
5672:
5669:
5667:
5664:
5662:
5659:
5658:
5656:
5654:Core subjects
5652:
5648:
5641:
5636:
5634:
5629:
5627:
5622:
5621:
5618:
5612:
5608:
5604:
5601:
5598:
5596:
5592:
5589:
5588:
5584:
5580:
5578:
5573:
5571:
5569:
5564:
5561:
5560:
5555:
5551:
5545:
5541:
5539:
5536:
5533:
5531:
5528:
5526:
5522:
5521:
5516:
5515:Paul H. Rubin
5513:
5511:
5508:Carl Geiger,
5507:
5504:
5500:
5497:
5495:
5491:
5489:
5485:
5482:
5479:, 2004 Oct.,
5478:
5475:
5473:(1): 405–419.
5472:
5468:
5467:
5462:
5458:
5455:
5451:
5447:
5444:
5440:
5436:
5433:
5431:
5427:
5423:
5420:
5417:
5413:
5409:
5408:
5403:
5400:
5398:
5394:
5391:
5390:
5386:
5382:
5381:0-8157-3760-2
5378:
5374:
5370:
5366:
5363:
5360:
5356:
5353:
5350:
5349:
5344:
5341:
5337:
5336:
5332:
5325:
5322:
5321:"Tort Reform"
5317:
5314:
5298:
5291:
5284:
5281:
5278:
5277:0-684-84147-9
5274:
5270:
5264:
5261:
5248:
5244:
5237:
5234:
5229:
5225:
5219:
5216:
5208:
5204:
5200:
5196:
5192:
5188:
5181:
5177:
5173:
5172:Currie, Janet
5167:
5164:
5159:
5155:
5151:
5148:
5142:
5139:
5134:
5130:
5124:
5121:
5116:
5112:
5106:
5103:
5098:
5094:
5090:
5087:
5081:
5078:
5073:
5069:
5065:
5061:
5054:
5051:
5035:
5028:
5022:
5019:
5006:
5000:
4997:
4985:
4979:
4976:
4964:
4957:
4954:
4942:
4936:
4933:
4929:
4925:
4919:
4917:
4913:
4901:
4897:
4891:
4888:
4876:
4870:
4867:
4864:
4860:
4857:
4852:
4849:
4836:
4832:
4826:
4823:
4812:on 2010-03-09
4811:
4807:
4801:
4798:
4782:
4775:
4769:
4766:
4753:
4749:
4743:
4740:
4736:
4735:
4728:
4725:
4720:
4714:
4711:
4706:
4699:
4696:
4690:
4687:
4682:
4678:
4672:
4669:
4657:on 3 May 2014
4653:
4649:
4642:
4638:
4632:
4629:
4618:
4614:
4607:
4604:
4593:
4592:Texas Monthly
4589:
4582:
4580:
4578:
4576:
4572:
4560:
4556:
4549:
4546:
4542:
4541:
4535:
4532:
4520:
4516:
4509:
4506:
4494:
4490:
4486:
4479:
4476:
4471:
4467:
4463:
4457:
4454:
4449:
4445:
4441:
4437:
4431:
4429:
4427:
4423:
4419:
4415:
4412:
4407:
4405:
4401:
4389:
4383:
4380:
4376:
4371:
4368:
4363:
4359:
4355:
4349:
4346:
4334:
4328:
4325:
4320:
4316:
4309:
4306:
4293:
4289:
4283:
4280:
4267:
4263:
4257:
4254:
4241:
4237:
4231:
4228:
4224:
4220:
4216:
4211:
4208:
4204:
4200:
4197:
4192:
4189:
4185:
4180:
4177:
4174:
4168:
4165:
4161:
4157:
4156:
4149:
4146:
4140:
4137:
4131:
4128:
4115:
4111:
4107:
4100:
4097:
4092:
4085:
4078:
4075:
4063:
4057:
4054:
4042:
4036:
4033:
4028:
4027:
4022:
4015:
4012:
4009:
4005:
3999:
3998:
3993:
3986:
3983:
3979:
3978:
3972:
3969:
3965:
3964:
3957:
3954:
3950:
3944:
3941:
3937:
3933:
3930:
3925:
3922:
3916:
3913:
3901:
3894:
3891:
3879:
3873:
3870:
3856:
3850:
3847:
3835:
3829:
3826:
3814:
3808:
3805:
3793:
3787:
3784:
3773:on 2012-08-06
3772:
3768:
3762:
3759:
3747:
3745:9781139504898
3741:
3737:
3736:
3728:
3726:
3722:
3710:
3708:9781107136991
3704:
3700:
3699:
3694:
3688:
3685:
3681:
3680:
3673:
3671:
3667:
3654:
3650:
3646:
3639:
3636:
3632:
3628:
3622:
3618:
3617:
3612:
3606:
3603:
3589:
3583:
3580:
3574:
3571:
3568:
3567:0-684-84147-9
3564:
3560:
3556:
3551:
3548:
3543:
3539:
3538:
3537:Business Week
3533:
3526:
3523:
3518:
3514:
3510:
3503:
3500:
3495:
3491:
3485:
3482:
3478:
3477:Making Amends
3472:
3469:
3465:
3464:Heil v Rankin
3459:
3456:
3451:
3445:
3442:
3434:
3428:
3425:
3420:
3416:
3412:
3408:
3404:
3400:
3393:
3386:
3383:
3378:
3374:
3370:
3366:
3362:
3358:
3354:
3350:
3343:
3340:
3335:
3331:
3327:
3323:
3316:
3313:
3308:
3304:
3300:
3296:
3289:
3286:
3282:
3281:
3275:
3272:
3260:
3256:
3249:
3247:
3243:
3231:
3227:
3221:
3218:
3213:
3209:
3205:
3201:
3197:
3190:
3188:
3184:
3180:
3175:
3172:
3161:
3157:
3153:
3149:
3145:
3141:
3137:
3130:
3127:
3113:
3107:
3104:
3092:
3088:
3082:
3079:
3066:
3062:
3061:
3053:
3050:
3038:
3034:
3027:
3024:
3012:
3006:
3003:
2997:
2993:
2992:
2984:
2981:
2977:
2971:
2968:
2962:
2959:
2947:
2943:
2937:
2934:
2931:
2923:
2920:
2907:
2903:
2899:
2895:
2891:
2890:
2885:
2878:
2875:
2871:
2866:
2864:
2860:
2854:
2852:
2848:
2836:
2835:
2827:
2825:
2821:
2817:
2816:
2809:
2806:
2802:
2801:
2794:
2791:
2787:
2782:
2779:
2775:
2770:
2764:
2761:
2757:
2756:
2751:
2747:
2743:
2742:
2737:
2736:
2731:
2725:
2722:
2718:
2712:
2709:
2696:
2692:
2688:
2681:
2678:
2674:
2668:
2666:
2664:
2662:
2658:
2651:
2643:
2639:
2635:
2631:
2627:
2623:
2619:
2618:Joe Lieberman
2615:
2611:
2607:
2603:
2599:
2593:
2590:
2583:
2580:
2574:
2571:
2566:
2561:
2557:
2551:
2548:
2541:
2538:
2532:
2529:
2525:
2521:
2517:
2513:
2509:
2505:
2499:
2496:
2492:
2486:
2483:
2476:
2471:
2467:
2464:
2460:
2457:
2455:
2452:
2450:
2447:
2444:
2443:
2439:
2437:
2434:
2431:
2430:
2426:
2424:
2421:
2419:
2416:
2414:
2411:
2409:
2406:
2404:
2401:
2400:
2399:
2396:
2394:
2391:
2389:
2386:
2384:
2381:
2379:
2376:
2375:
2371:
2369:
2367:
2363:
2359:
2355:
2348:
2346:
2342:
2336:
2334:
2329:
2327:
2323:
2318:
2314:
2306:
2304:
2302:
2298:
2294:
2290:
2286:
2282:
2276:
2271:
2268:
2263:
2261:
2257:
2256:Murray Mackay
2252:
2248:
2243:
2238:
2234:
2229:
2227:
2223:
2219:
2214:
2211:
2207:
2201:
2197:
2194:
2190:
2189:Stephen Teret
2186:
2177:
2175:
2171:
2168:
2164:
2160:
2156:
2147:
2143:
2140:
2137:
2136:
2135:Making Amends
2131:
2128:
2125:
2124:
2122:
2118:
2114:
2113:Woolf Reforms
2110:
2102:
2100:
2097:
2092:
2084:
2082:
2080:
2075:
2071:
2066:
2062:
2060:
2056:
2052:
2046:
2044:
2040:
2032:
2030:
2028:
2024:
2020:
2016:
2012:
2008:
2000:
1999:trial by jury
1995:
1990:
1986:
1978:
1976:
1974:
1969:
1965:
1961:
1960:lawsuit abuse
1957:
1953:
1949:
1945:
1944:Hurricane Ike
1941:
1940:Texas Monthly
1937:
1933:
1928:
1927:
1926:Texas Monthly
1922:
1917:
1915:
1911:
1907:
1903:
1899:
1895:
1894:
1889:
1885:
1881:
1877:
1873:
1868:
1866:
1862:
1857:
1854:
1850:
1846:
1842:
1838:
1834:
1830:
1826:
1821:
1819:
1815:
1811:
1805:
1803:
1798:
1797:Towers Perrin
1794:
1790:
1785:
1783:
1778:
1777:United States
1771:United States
1770:
1765:
1763:
1761:
1757:
1753:
1748:
1746:
1742:
1737:
1735:
1731:
1726:
1722:
1719:
1715:
1710:
1705:
1703:
1702:libel tourism
1699:
1695:
1690:
1689:Class actions
1686:
1682:
1673:
1667:
1662:
1660:
1656:
1651:
1645:
1643:
1641:
1637:
1633:
1629:
1624:
1620:
1616:
1608:
1606:
1604:
1600:
1595:
1594:
1589:
1588:Richard Leigh
1585:
1580:
1576:
1568:
1566:
1563:
1562:
1556:
1555:public policy
1552:
1548:
1544:
1540:
1536:
1534:
1530:
1526:
1522:
1515:
1513:
1506:
1504:
1502:
1493:
1491:
1489:
1485:
1481:
1477:
1473:
1469:
1462:
1454:
1452:
1450:
1445:
1441:
1440:American rule
1437:
1433:
1429:
1425:
1421:
1416:
1412:
1408:
1402:
1400:
1396:
1392:
1388:
1384:
1378:
1375:
1371:
1364:
1356:
1354:
1350:
1348:
1344:
1339:
1335:
1330:
1328:
1327:
1321:
1317:
1313:
1307:
1305:
1299:
1293:
1291:
1289:
1288:
1283:
1278:
1276:
1272:
1265:
1261:
1253:
1248:
1246:
1244:
1240:
1236:
1228:
1226:
1223:
1218:
1216:
1211:
1207:
1203:
1199:
1195:
1189:
1185:
1177:
1175:
1172:
1168:
1164:
1163:force majeure
1160:
1156:
1152:
1145:
1139:
1131:
1129:
1125:
1121:
1117:
1113:
1110:
1105:
1101:
1097:
1089:
1087:
1083:
1081:
1076:
1072:
1068:
1064:
1059:
1058:legal defence
1055:
1051:
1045:
1044:Libel tourism
1041:
1037:
1029:
1027:
1025:
1020:
1016:
1012:
1008:
1004:
1000:
996:
992:
988:
984:
979:
977:
973:
969:
965:
961:
957:
953:
949:
945:
944:
939:
935:
931:
927:
923:
918:
915:
911:
907:
903:
898:
894:
890:
882:
880:
877:
873:
869:
865:
861:
860:civil justice
857:
846:
841:
839:
834:
832:
827:
826:
824:
823:
818:
813:
808:
807:
806:
805:
800:
796:
792:
789:
787:
784:
782:
779:
777:
774:
772:
769:
768:
767:
766:
762:
757:
752:
751:United States
749:
747:
744:
742:
739:
737:
734:
732:
729:
727:
724:
722:
719:
717:
714:
712:
709:
708:
707:
706:
701:
696:
693:
691:
688:
686:
683:
679:
675:
670:
667:
665:
662:
658:
655:
654:
653:
650:
649:
648:
647:
642:
637:
634:
632:
629:
627:
624:
622:
619:
617:
614:
610:
607:
605:
602:
600:
597:
596:
595:
592:
591:
590:
589:
584:
579:
576:
574:
571:
569:
566:
564:
563:
559:
557:
556:
552:
550:
549:
545:
543:
540:
538:
535:
533:
530:
528:
525:
524:
523:
522:
517:
512:
509:
507:
504:
502:
499:
495:
492:
491:
490:
487:
485:
482:
480:
477:
475:
472:
470:
467:
466:
465:
464:
461:
457:
452:
449:
447:
444:
439:
436:
434:
431:
429:
426:
425:
424:
423:
420:
416:
411:
410:
406:
404:
401:
400:
399:
398:
395:
391:
386:
383:
381:
378:
376:
373:
372:
371:
370:
366:
362:
358:
353:
350:
348:
345:
343:
340:
338:
335:
333:
330:
328:
325:
323:
322:
318:
316:
313:
309:
306:
305:
304:
301:
297:
294:
292:
289:
287:
284:
283:
282:
279:
278:
277:
276:
273:
269:
262:
259:
257:
254:
253:
252:
249:
247:
244:
242:
239:
237:
234:
233:
232:
231:
228:
224:
217:
214:
212:
209:
207:
204:
202:
199:
198:
197:Sexual torts
196:
194:
191:
189:
186:
184:
181:
177:
174:
173:
172:
169:
167:
164:
159:
156:
155:
154:
151:
149:
148:Appropriation
146:
145:
144:
143:
140:
136:
131:
128:
124:
121:
119:
116:
115:
114:
111:
110:
109:
108:
103:
97:
93:
91:
88:
86:
83:
81:
78:
77:
76:
75:
72:
68:
63:
58:
57:
54:
50:
46:
42:
41:
34:
30:
19:
6832:
6825:
6811:
6797:
6570:Jurisdiction
6538:Legal remedy
6493:Adjudication
6393:Legal theory
6231:Ratification
6226:Promulgation
6197:Proclamation
6177:Codification
6110:Human rights
6098:Divine right
6088:Constitution
6056:Women in law
5974:Military law
5969:Marriage law
5964:Maritime law
5863:Election law
5803:Aviation law
5793:Abortion law
5745:Property law
5681:Criminal law
5610:
5576:
5567:
5558:
5549:OJLS 407-415
5518:
5470:
5464:
5425:
5406:
5368:
5358:
5346:
5345:Peter Cane,
5339:
5333:Bibliography
5323:
5316:
5304:. Retrieved
5297:the original
5283:
5268:
5263:
5251:. Retrieved
5247:the original
5236:
5228:the original
5218:
5190:
5186:
5166:
5157:
5154:Robert Litan
5141:
5132:
5123:
5114:
5105:
5096:
5093:Robert Litan
5080:
5071:
5067:
5053:
5041:. Retrieved
5034:the original
5021:
5009:. Retrieved
4999:
4988:. Retrieved
4978:
4967:. Retrieved
4956:
4945:. Retrieved
4935:
4904:. Retrieved
4902:. 2005-01-26
4899:
4890:
4879:. Retrieved
4869:
4851:
4839:. Retrieved
4835:the original
4825:
4814:. Retrieved
4810:the original
4800:
4788:. Retrieved
4781:the original
4768:
4756:. Retrieved
4752:the original
4742:
4732:
4727:
4713:
4698:
4689:
4680:
4671:
4659:. Retrieved
4652:the original
4631:
4620:. Retrieved
4616:
4606:
4595:. Retrieved
4591:
4562:. Retrieved
4558:
4548:
4538:
4534:
4522:. Retrieved
4518:
4508:
4497:. Retrieved
4493:the original
4488:
4478:
4470:the original
4465:
4456:
4439:
4392:. Retrieved
4382:
4370:
4362:the original
4357:
4348:
4337:. Retrieved
4327:
4318:
4314:
4308:
4296:. Retrieved
4292:the original
4282:
4270:. Retrieved
4265:
4256:
4244:. Retrieved
4240:the original
4230:
4210:
4191:
4179:
4167:
4154:
4153:
4148:
4139:
4130:
4118:. Retrieved
4113:
4109:
4099:
4090:
4077:
4066:. Retrieved
4062:"Loser Pays"
4056:
4045:. Retrieved
4035:
4024:
4014:
4003:
3995:
3985:
3975:
3971:
3961:
3956:
3948:
3943:
3924:
3915:
3904:. Retrieved
3893:
3882:. Retrieved
3872:
3861:. Retrieved
3849:
3838:. Retrieved
3828:
3817:. Retrieved
3807:
3796:. Retrieved
3786:
3775:. Retrieved
3771:the original
3761:
3749:. Retrieved
3734:
3712:. Retrieved
3697:
3687:
3678:
3659:30 September
3657:. Retrieved
3652:
3648:
3638:
3630:
3615:
3605:
3594:. Retrieved
3582:
3573:
3558:
3550:
3542:the original
3535:
3525:
3516:
3512:
3502:
3494:the original
3484:
3476:
3471:
3463:
3458:
3444:
3427:
3402:
3398:
3385:
3352:
3348:
3342:
3325:
3321:
3315:
3298:
3294:
3288:
3278:
3274:
3262:. Retrieved
3258:
3234:. Retrieved
3232:. 2000-03-20
3229:
3220:
3195:
3174:
3163:. Retrieved
3143:
3139:
3129:
3118:. Retrieved
3106:
3095:. Retrieved
3093:. 1994-10-16
3090:
3081:
3069:. Retrieved
3065:the original
3059:
3052:
3040:. Retrieved
3036:
3026:
3015:. Retrieved
3005:
2996:the original
2990:
2983:
2970:
2961:
2949:. Retrieved
2945:
2936:
2930: 425.16
2922:
2910:. Retrieved
2906:the original
2889:On The Media
2887:
2877:
2869:
2839:, retrieved
2833:
2813:
2808:
2799:
2793:
2785:
2781:
2763:
2753:
2745:
2739:
2733:
2724:
2716:
2711:
2699:. Retrieved
2694:
2690:
2680:
2672:
2622:New Republic
2604:and for the
2598:Barack Obama
2592:
2582:
2573:
2565:the Pentagon
2556:Rick Boucher
2550:
2540:
2531:
2498:
2490:
2485:
2470:Patent troll
2440:
2427:
2423:Junk science
2350:
2338:
2330:
2310:
2297:Lyme disease
2277:
2273:
2265:
2253:
2249:
2245:
2240:
2236:
2231:
2215:
2203:
2199:
2181:
2172:
2151:
2134:
2098:
2094:
2067:
2063:
2047:
2036:
2004:
1963:
1939:
1924:
1918:
1914:John Roberts
1891:
1869:
1858:
1853:class action
1849:English Rule
1822:
1806:
1786:
1774:
1749:
1738:
1727:
1723:
1706:
1685:Mass actions
1681:class action
1678:
1664:
1657:of actions.
1652:
1649:
1612:
1591:
1579:Commonwealth
1575:English rule
1572:
1559:
1541:
1537:
1523:
1519:
1516:Damages caps
1510:
1497:
1464:
1430:or charging
1403:
1379:
1366:
1351:
1331:
1324:
1308:
1300:
1297:
1285:
1279:
1275:Commonwealth
1267:
1243:moral hazard
1232:
1219:
1210:moral hazard
1191:
1149:doctrine of
1147:
1126:
1122:
1118:
1114:
1093:
1084:
1047:
994:
980:
948:duty of care
941:
937:
919:
902:compensatory
889:civil claims
886:
855:
854:
776:Criminal law
695:Class action
651:
560:
553:
546:
489:Self-defense
407:
385:Deep pockets
319:
281:Duty of care
43:Part of the
29:
6742:Legislature
6673:Bureaucracy
6470:Rule of man
6465:Rule of law
6440:Libertarian
6303:Chinese law
6204:Legislation
6154:Regulations
6142:Law reports
6120:Natural law
6016:Reparations
6011:Refugee law
5934:Jurimetrics
5875:(Media law)
5813:Banking law
5808:Amnesty law
5786:Disciplines
5723:Private law
5591:Tort reform
5452:(discusses
5365:Peter Huber
5150:Peter Huber
5089:Peter Huber
4896:"Economist"
4540:BMW v. Gore
4298:11 December
4272:11 December
4120:5 September
3264:January 25,
2974:Section 8,
2803:(11.9.2000)
2750:ginger beer
2504:New Zealand
2322:Nobel Prize
2228:found that
2085:New Zealand
1952:Dan Patrick
1893:BMW v. Gore
1714:jury trials
1709:Common Good
1529:malpractice
1413:or under a
1387:rule of law
1336:, which is
1318:cases. The
1171:acts of God
1153:applied to
1003:false light
856:Tort reform
652:Tort reform
286:Trespassers
251:Malpractice
246:Entrustment
166:False light
6861:Law reform
6850:Categories
6735:Law school
6615:Prosecutor
6553:Magistrate
6340:Jewish law
6298:Common law
6219:Rulemaking
6214:Regulation
6164:Law making
6103:Divine law
6079:Legal code
6026:Sports law
5949:Law of war
5899:Health law
5884:Family law
5868:Energy law
5818:Bankruptcy
5755:Punishment
5750:Public law
5271:, p. 649,
4990:2012-06-28
4969:2012-06-28
4947:2012-06-28
4906:2012-06-28
4881:2012-06-28
4816:2012-06-28
4622:2017-04-14
4597:2017-04-14
4499:2009-01-11
4394:2012-06-28
4339:2012-06-28
4068:2012-06-28
4047:2012-06-28
3906:2012-06-28
3884:2012-06-28
3863:2012-06-28
3840:2012-06-28
3819:2012-06-28
3798:2012-06-28
3777:2012-06-28
3596:2012-06-28
3561:, p. 649,
3236:2012-06-28
3165:2012-06-28
3120:2012-06-28
3097:2012-06-28
3017:2012-06-28
2841:12 October
2652:References
2516:negligence
2358:negligence
2315:professor
2281:Paul Offit
2220:professor
2159:negligence
2107:See also:
2019:defamation
2007:entrenched
1983:See also:
1876:defamation
1793:plaintiffs
1730:common law
1700:cases and
1698:defamation
1615:negligence
1603:defamation
1449:disbarment
1415:good-faith
1258:See also:
1080:SPEECH Act
1054:intimidate
1040:SPEECH Act
1026:lawsuits.
991:defamation
926:negligence
906:aggravated
897:common law
883:Background
872:negligence
864:common law
862:system in
761:common law
664:Quasi-tort
616:Injunction
609:Incidental
428:Conspiracy
153:Defamation
130:Conversion
45:common law
6713:Judiciary
6708:Executive
6683:The bench
6620:Solicitor
6595:Barrister
6475:Sociology
6460:Pseudolaw
6400:Anarchist
6357:Roman law
6345:Parsi law
6330:Hindu law
6318:Canon law
6293:Civil law
6246:Concordat
6137:Precedent
6046:Trust law
6021:Space law
5858:Drugs law
5728:Procedure
5666:Civil law
5404:. (2003)
5355:PS Atiyah
5253:April 11,
5207:154702008
5043:April 11,
5011:April 11,
4986:. Epi.org
4943:. Epi.org
4900:Economist
4171:see now,
3419:0144-8188
3369:0741-6261
2697:: 269–280
2520:Australia
2285:Bendectin
2148:Criticism
1880:Democrats
1818:CAT scans
1789:attorneys
1551:civil law
1436:discovery
1424:bad faith
1420:discovery
1411:precedent
1347:negligent
1304:insurance
956:negligent
771:Contracts
711:Australia
519:Liability
479:Necessity
367:liability
291:Licensees
211:Seduction
6856:Tort law
6820:Category
6762:Tribunal
6747:Military
6590:Attorney
6560:Judgment
6420:Feminist
6335:Jain law
6132:Case law
5853:Cyberlaw
5760:Corporal
5738:Criminal
5708:Evidence
5698:Doctrine
5676:Contract
5603:Archived
5306:11 April
5062:(2007).
4859:Archived
4841:11 April
4790:11 April
4758:11 April
4564:11 April
4414:Archived
4246:11 April
4199:Archived
3932:Archived
3613:(2015).
3198:. SSRN.
3160:15452009
3071:11 April
3042:11 April
2951:27 March
2634:pro-life
2522:and the
2372:See also
2345:asbestos
2293:vaccines
2185:asbestos
1968:barratry
1756:barratry
1732:rule of
1669:—
1659:New York
1640:Virginia
1632:Maryland
1605:suits).
910:punitive
786:Property
781:Evidence
631:Replevin
599:Punitive
586:Remedies
460:Defences
394:Nuisance
365:absolute
296:Invitees
123:chattels
113:Trespass
53:Tort law
6834:Outline
6771:History
6678:The bar
6652:Verdict
6600:Counsel
6580:Justice
6435:History
6258:Statute
6074:Charter
6036:Tax law
5984:Probate
5611:Data360
5156:(ed.).
5095:(ed.).
4737:AC 1129
4524:May 25,
3714:12 July
3377:2555680
3307:2006714
2912:29 June
2628:editor
2324:winner
2258:of the
2009:in the
1856:cases.
1802:lottery
1745:statute
1628:Alabama
1501:damages
1215:elastic
1109:Baicker
1007:slander
993:torts (
930:damages
799:estates
626:Detinue
621:Tracing
604:Special
594:Damages
474:Consent
261:medical
157:Slander
85:Battery
80:Assault
62:Outline
6752:Police
6723:Agency
6605:Lawyer
6350:Sharia
6241:Treaty
6236:Repeal
6182:Decree
6093:Custom
5989:Estate
5939:Labour
5703:Equity
5595:Curlie
5562:(1986)
5414:
5379:
5361:(1997)
5351:(2006)
5275:
5205:
4489:Forbes
4466:Forbes
4116:: 1067
3751:9 June
3742:
3705:
3623:
3565:
3479:(2003)
3417:
3375:
3367:
3334:117018
3332:
3305:
3212:870492
3210:
3158:
2769:typist
2730:yogurt
2701:6 July
2675:, Ch.8
2642:RU-486
2636:group
2587:judge.
2291:) and
2119:, and
2025:, and
1886:. The
1638:, and
1065:. The
1050:censor
1042:, and
1005:, and
989:, and
962:(e.g.
908:, and
797:, and
795:trusts
759:Other
746:Taiwan
716:Canada
669:Delict
636:Trover
361:Strict
47:series
6827:Index
6693:Court
6637:Trial
6543:Judge
6384:Yassa
6187:Edict
5733:Civil
5686:Crime
5609:from
5300:(PDF)
5293:(PDF)
5203:S2CID
5183:(PDF)
5037:(PDF)
5030:(PDF)
4784:(PDF)
4777:(PDF)
4661:3 May
4655:(PDF)
4644:(PDF)
4087:(PDF)
3947:see,
3858:(PDF)
3591:(PDF)
3436:(PDF)
3395:(PDF)
3373:JSTOR
3330:JSTOR
3303:JSTOR
3115:(PDF)
3037:Slate
2626:Slate
2477:Notes
2354:fraud
2155:fraud
1024:SLAPP
999:libel
791:Wills
763:areas
741:Japan
736:India
721:China
674:civil
446:Fraud
256:legal
160:Libel
6575:Jury
6523:Fiqh
6379:Xeer
5777:Tort
5693:Deed
5552:The
5441:, a
5412:ISBN
5377:ISBN
5308:2018
5273:ISBN
5255:2018
5152:and
5091:and
5045:2018
5013:2018
4843:2018
4792:2018
4760:2018
4663:2014
4566:2018
4526:2010
4321:: 4.
4300:2017
4274:2017
4248:2018
4122:2017
3753:2020
3740:ISBN
3716:2020
3703:ISBN
3661:2017
3655:: 63
3621:ISBN
3563:ISBN
3462:see
3415:ISSN
3365:ISSN
3266:2013
3208:SSRN
3156:PMID
3073:2018
3044:2018
2953:2020
2914:2011
2894:WNYC
2843:2011
2703:2020
2624:and
2468:and
2299:and
2295:for
2037:The
1989:Jury
1987:and
1908:and
1900:and
1816:and
1814:MRIs
1586:and
1262:and
1186:and
1013:and
995:i.e.
958:and
868:tort
676:and
363:and
118:land
5647:Law
5593:at
5556:'s
5463:".
5195:doi
5191:123
4444:doi
4004:See
3407:doi
3357:doi
3200:doi
3148:doi
2902:PBS
2719:137
2074:GDP
1601:in
1220:In
1017:in
966:vs
6852::
6081:/
5517:,
5501:,
5471:16
5469:.
5437:,
5424:,
5395:,
5375:,
5357:,
5201:.
5189:.
5185:.
5174:;
5131:.
5113:.
5072:50
5070:.
5066:.
4926:,
4915:^
4898:.
4679:.
4646:.
4615:.
4590:.
4574:^
4557:.
4517:.
4487:.
4464:.
4438:.
4425:^
4403:^
4356:.
4319:13
4317:.
4264:.
4217:,
4114:61
4112:.
4108:.
4089:.
4023:.
3994:.
3724:^
3669:^
3651:.
3647:.
3629:.
3557:,
3534:.
3517:93
3515:.
3511:.
3413:.
3403:20
3401:.
3397:.
3371:.
3363:.
3353:15
3351:.
3326:88
3324:.
3299:80
3297:.
3257:.
3245:^
3228:.
3206:.
3186:^
3154:.
3144:23
3142:.
3138:.
3089:.
3035:.
2944:.
2900:,
2892:.
2886:.
2862:^
2850:^
2823:^
2767:A
2695:16
2693:.
2689:.
2660:^
2364:,
2360:,
2356:,
2161:,
2157:,
2115:,
2111:,
2021:,
1997:A
1975:.
1867:.
1827:,
1784:.
1758:,
1747:.
1704:.
1634:,
1630:,
1451:.
1401:.
1306:.
1245:.
1161:,
1052:,
1038:,
1001:,
997:,
985:,
904:,
793:,
5639:e
5632:t
5625:v
5418:.
5310:.
5257:.
5209:.
5197::
5047:.
5015:.
4993:.
4972:.
4950:.
4909:.
4884:.
4845:.
4819:.
4794:.
4762:.
4707:.
4683:.
4665:.
4625:.
4600:.
4568:.
4528:.
4502:.
4450:.
4446::
4397:.
4342:.
4302:.
4276:.
4250:.
4124:.
4093:.
4071:.
4050:.
4029:.
4000:.
3909:.
3887:.
3866:.
3843:.
3822:.
3801:.
3780:.
3755:.
3718:.
3663:.
3653:9
3599:.
3519:.
3452:.
3438:.
3421:.
3409::
3379:.
3359::
3336:.
3309:.
3268:.
3239:.
3214:.
3202::
3168:.
3150::
3123:.
3100:.
3075:.
3046:.
3020:.
3000:.
2978:.
2955:.
2916:.
2896:(
2705:.
844:e
837:t
830:v
680:)
64:)
60:(
20:)
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.