Knowledge

Total player rating

Source 📝

66:. Each player then has a rating in Batting Runs, Pitching Runs, and Fielding Runs, usually adjusted for park and position, and the sum of these values is divided by 10 and is expressed as an offset in games from an "average" baseball player. Thus, a star player in a season might have been worth 6 games more than an average player, while a scrub might be 5 games below average. The justification for representing a game as 10 runs was determined empirically and varied by era, but 10 was the rule of thumb for back-of-the-envelope computations, e.g. for fans comparing players using 81:
awards a hitter with runs which scored when he collected a hit or a walk, even though the player has no control over whether the players who batted before him got on base, which is a significant influence on whether he is able to drive them in. Thus, players with high RBI totals for a season may have
30:
players, and to enable players to be compared against each other even when they played for different teams, at different positions, and in different eras. It was developed by
73:
TPR helped disseminate the notion that players should not be given credit for events over which they have no control. As an example which embraces giving such credit, the
103:, foremost among them being the observation that an average player has a TPR value of 0, whereas in fact an average player has substantial positive value. 133: 82:
such not because they're among the best hitters themselves, but because they hit behind players who are among the best at getting on base.
85:
In the 1990s, some criticisms of TPR prompted other sabermetricians to develop new methods of measuring player value, such as
90: 155: 63: 78: 86: 129: 55: 74: 47: 39: 149: 51: 125: 67: 31: 59: 34: 99: 94: 27: 50:, in which each event in a baseball game (for instance, a 26:(BFW/PW) is a metric for measuring the value of 97:presented some of these criticisms in his book 8: 43:series of encyclopedias during the 1980s. 112: 46:Total player rating is computed using 7: 14: 122:The Dickson Baseball Dictionary 1: 91:value over replacement player 37:and was popularized in the 24:Batter-Fielder/Pitcher Wins 172: 62:) is assigned a value in 120:Dickson, Paul (2009). 22:(TPR), also known as 156:Baseball statistics 20:Total player rating 124:(Third ed.). 87:equivalent average 135:978-0-393-06681-4 163: 140: 139: 117: 171: 170: 166: 165: 164: 162: 161: 160: 146: 145: 144: 143: 136: 128:. p. 883. 119: 118: 114: 109: 17: 16:Baseball metric 12: 11: 5: 169: 167: 159: 158: 148: 147: 142: 141: 134: 111: 110: 108: 105: 75:runs batted in 48:linear weights 40:Total Baseball 32:sabermetrician 15: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 168: 157: 154: 153: 151: 137: 131: 127: 123: 116: 113: 106: 104: 102: 101: 96: 92: 88: 83: 80: 76: 71: 69: 65: 61: 57: 53: 52:base on balls 49: 44: 42: 41: 36: 33: 29: 25: 21: 126:W. W. Norton 121: 115: 98: 84: 72: 68:runs created 45: 38: 23: 19: 18: 60:stolen base 35:Pete Palmer 107:References 100:Win Shares 95:Bill James 79:statistic 150:Category 28:baseball 132:  77:(RBI) 56:double 58:or a 130:ISBN 89:and 64:runs 54:, a 152:: 93:. 70:. 138:.

Index

baseball
sabermetrician
Pete Palmer
Total Baseball
linear weights
base on balls
double
stolen base
runs
runs created
runs batted in
statistic
equivalent average
value over replacement player
Bill James
Win Shares
W. W. Norton
ISBN
978-0-393-06681-4
Category
Baseball statistics

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.